0875865720.Algora.Publishing.Brewing.Battles.A.History.Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

0875865720.Algora.Publishing.Brewing.Battles.A.History.Of BREWING BATTLES A HISTORY OF AMERICAN BEER BREWING BATTLES A HISTORY OF AMERICAN BEER AMY MITTELMAN Algora Publishing New York © 2008 by Algora Publishing. All Rights Reserved www.algora.com No portion of this book (beyond what is permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the United States Copyright Act of 1976) may be reproduced by any process, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the express written permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data — Mittelman, Amy. Brewing battles : a history of American beer / Amy Mittelman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-87586-572-0 (trade paper: alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-87586-573-7 (hard cover: alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-87586-574-4 (ebook) 1. Beer—United States--History. 2. Beer industry—United States—History. 3. Beer—Taxation—United States—History. I. Title. TP573.U6M58 2007 641.2’309—dc22 2007036283 Front Cover: Top: Bub’s BBQ, Sunderland, MA. by Alan Berman Bottom: Smiling woman with beer glass © Emely/zefa/Corbis Back Cover: Author photo by Andrea Burns. Printed in the United States This book is dedicated to the memory of my parents, Beatrice and Louis Mittelman TA B LE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CH APTER 1. EVERY MAN HIS OWN BREWER : BREWING IN T H E UNITED STATES DURING T H E COLONIAL , EARLY NATIONAL , AND ANTE B ELLUM PERIODS 5 CH APTER 2. MORALITY FOLLOWS IN T H E WAKE OF MALT LIQUOR : TH E BREWING INDUSTRY AND T H E FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 1862–1898 23 CH APTER 3. DO AS T H E ROMANS DO: DRINKERS , SALOONS , AND BREWERS , 1880–1898 47 CH APTER 4. WH O WILL PAY T H E TAX ? BREWERS AND T H E BATTLE OVER PRO H I B ITION , 1905–1933 71 CH APTER 5. BEER FLOWS : REPEAL OF PRO H I B ITION , 1933–1941 97 CH APTER 6. BEER : TH E MORALE BUILDER , 1942–1952 125 CH APTER 7. MILLER TIME , 1953–1986 149 CH APTER 8. JOE AND JANE SIX PACK , 1970–2006 173 CONCLUSION 201 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 203 WORKS CITED 205 Government Documents 205 Proceedings and Reports 206 Newspapers and Periodicals 207 Articles 213 Pamphlets, Dissertations, and Unpublished Materials 214 INDEX 217 INTRODUCTION Beer is one of humankind’s oldest drinks. There is evidence that humans have been drinking beer since the beginning of civilization. In early modern Europe people considered beer essential for good health. The Mayflower landed at Plym- outh Rock in part because they were running out of beer. Taxes on beer have at times provided over fifty percent of this country’s in- ternal revenue and the industry today has a gross national product of $144 bil- lion. Some 84 million Americans drink beer. This is more people than drink milk, according to some estimates. The marketing and drinking of beer are facts of daily American life. I like to drink beer; I have done so since the age of eleven. In 1965 my father lost his job. My sister was fifteen, my brother eighteen. My mother, an eternal optimist, looked at this as an opportunity for our family to take an extended vacation, while we were all still “home” and able to travel together. The five of us flew to Denver and proceeded to drive across the western part of the United States. Each night at dinner, my father would order a beer, and I would ask for a taste. Researching this book, I discovered that alcohol and tobacco taxes played a large role in supporting the financial activities of the federal government from 1862 to 1913 and that, in self defense, beer brewers formed the United States Brewers Association (USBA). It turns out to have been the country’s oldest trade association, and it lasted 124 years. The relationship between the federal gov- ernment and the liquor industry is an important part of the story, but it is the enjoyment beer provides that led me to focus on beer and brewing in the first 1 Brewing Battles : A History of American Beer place. Thus I highlight the German brewers who founded the USBA to amelio- rate federal taxation. Those brewers were first generation German immigrants who came to America and transformed the brewing industry. The story of beer brewing in America is a classic immigrant story. Steeped in the long brewing traditions of their homeland, Germans came to this country determined to make lager beer the nation’s premier beverage. They labored hard, persevered through a devastating Prohibition, rose again, and achieved their goal. Yet, as happened to so many immigrants and their descendants, at the very moment of their tri- umph a challenge arose. Micro-brewers and craft brewers claimed the German immigrant brewers’ descendants had lost their soul on the way to the top. This morality play of beer, its evolution into a multimillion dollar business with a per- vasive influence throughout American society, and the determination of micro- brewers not to let the craft and traditional aspects of brewing be lost forever are the latest chapters in beer’s long history in America. The German ethnicity of the early brewing entrepreneurs gave a distinctly modern cast to the American industry. The brewers accepted government regu- lation and organized themselves to facilitate their relationship with the federal government. The USBA was formed in 1862. Most American industries did not develop such cohesiveness until the 1930s or later. In our current consumer society where extremely large businesses dominate most industries, it is tempting to see each industry as nothing more than those businesses. Almost all industries began with many small firms competing for their share of the market. All these businesses faced the rules and regulations of the national government as well as local municipalities. The sense that they would fare better if combined occurred to the brewers very early on. Thus the USBA was born. Other industries also saw the need for such unity; by the 1930s, most industries had some form of industry-wide association. For brewers, the association could provide a public face that would present and promote the in- dustry in a favorable light, something that was very important to an industry that was illegal for fourteen years. As the brewing industry grew and consoli- dated, there became fewer and fewer breweries. The need for unity within the in- dustry, however, did not disappear. This book looks at how these needs changed over time as the industry changed. Industry does not operate in a vacuum. The United States brewing industry has been the object of federal taxation since 1862. Further, brewing, along with manufacturers of distilled spirits and wine, is one of only two economic activi- ties which legislation has ever prohibited. The other, slavery, has obviously not returned while the cessation of liquor manufacture was only temporary. 2 Introduction Brewing in America has always proceeded under the watchful eye of the federal government. This book will discuss the relationship between the federal government and the brewing industry, as well as specific breweries. This rela- tionship goes back to the origins of the brewing industry and the origins of this country; milestones include the initiation of federal taxation and the brewers’ response, the growth of the industry under the system of federal taxation, the cessation of taxation with the advent of Prohibition, and the resumption of taxa- tion with Repeal. When liquor manufacture first resumed in 1933, the federal government ex- pected brewers to play their historic role of providing revenue via excise taxes. The country had had an income tax since 1913, and the country’s financial struc- ture further diversified during the Depression and World War II. Although beer, liquor, and wine all helped finance World War II and the Korean War, the coun- try’s revenue no longer depended so heavily on liquor taxes. This, however, did not mean that the government would not play a role in regulating the liquor industry. This book looks at the growth and consolidation of the brewing indus- try in the forty year period of 1951–1991, during which taxes remained stationary. Taxes did not rise, but breweries were required to place a warning label on beer bottles, create returnable cans, and not sell liquor to people under the age of twenty-one. The Federal Minimum Age Act, 1984, set twenty-one as the legal drinking age; brewers, large and small, once again faced the reality that the federal gov- ernment possessed the power to regulate the industry as much or as little as it pleased. The federal presence in the brewing industry originated with the need for revenue. This need has persisted; much of federal intervention correlates with how much revenue the government needs. The book examines the ebb and flow of federal regulation of the brewing industry with Prohibition as its peak. An industry is not just corporate executives or consumers. It is also people whose innovations, decisions, and actions contribute to the development and evolution of the product and the business that purveys the product. Brewers, brewmasters, workers, and drinkers all contributed to the growth of the indus- try. The book looks at these different elements from the early colonial period to the present. In examining society from a historical perspective, one cannot simply take the reality of the present and read it backwards. Anheuser–Busch leads the brewing industry and controls over fifty percent of the United States market. Investigating that one fact can tell us much about society today. Yet one cannot assume Anheuser–Busch’s dominance in the past.
Recommended publications
  • North America CANADA
    North America CANADA Gallons Guzzled 17.49 Gal Per Person Per Year Country/State/City Brewery Beer Date Rating Alc.% Thanks Web Site Alberta Calgary Big Rock Brewery McNally's Ale Dec-01 15.5 5.0% Gary B. www.bigrockbeer.com Cold Cock Winter Porter May-09 17.0 Gary B. Country/State/City Brewery Beer Date Rating Alc.% Thanks Web Site British Columbia Pacific Western Brewing Prince George Bulldog Canadian Lager May-09 16.0 Helen B. Company Vancouver Molson Breweries Molson Canadian Lager May-05 17.0 5.0% Helen B. Vancouver Island Brewing Vancouver Piper's Pale Ale May-09 16.0 Helen B. Company Country/State/City Brewery Beer Date Rating Alc.% Thanks Web Site Manitoba Country/State/City Brewery Beer Date Rating Alc.% Thanks Web Site New Brunswick Saint John Moosehead Brewery Moosehead Lager Jul-01 17.0 5.1% Gary B. Moosehead Light Lager Sep-09 15.0 4.8% Maurice S. Country/State/City Brewery Beer Date Rating Alc.% Thanks Web Site New Foundland St. John's Labatt Brewing Company Budweiser Lager Sep-02 18.0 5.0% Gary B. Bud Light Lager Sep-02 16.0 4.0% Gary B. St. John's Molson Brewery L.T.D. Black Horse Lager Sep-02 18.5 5.0% Gary B. Molson Canadian Lager Sep-09 17.5 5.0% Maurice S. Country/State/City Brewery Beer Date Rating Alc.% Thanks Web Site Northwest Territories Country/State/City Brewery Beer Date Rating Alc.% Thanks Web Site Nova Scotia Halifax Labatt Brewing Company Labatt's Blue Pilsner Set-02 16.0 4.3% Maurice S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Beer: Analysis of the Congressional Votes on the Beer Bill of 1933
    Public Choice https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0493-1 The politics of beer: analysis of the congressional votes on the beer bill of 1933 1 2 3 Eline Poelmans • John A. Dove • Jason E. Taylor Received: 26 June 2017 / Accepted: 4 December 2017 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017 Abstract Nine days after he took office in March 1933, Franklin Roosevelt asked Con- gress to amend existing federal Prohibition policy so as to allow for the sale and con- sumption of 3.2% alcohol beer. Over the following 8 days, the so-called ‘‘beer bill’’ was proposed, debated, passed and signed into law. This study analyzes the political decision making behind one of FDR’s earliest New Deal policies. Specifically, we consider how voter preferences, representatives’ ideologies, national party affiliations, and the influence of special interests affected legislative decision making. We find that special interests and party affiliations were particularly important drivers of congressional voting behavior. Keywords Beer legalization Á Prohibition Á Special interests Á Median voter Á Representative ideology Á New Deal Á Franklin Roosevelt Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017- 0493-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. & Jason E. Taylor [email protected] Eline Poelmans [email protected] John A. Dove [email protected] 1 LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, Faculty of Economics and Business, Campus Brussels,
    [Show full text]
  • Maria ABRAHAMSON Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (Sorad), Stockholm University, Sweden
    Maria ABRAHAMSON Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD), Stockholm University, Sweden PERCEPTIONS OF HEAVY DRINKING AND ALCOHOL PROBLEMS AMONG YOUNG ADULTS Data from focus groups is presented. Interviews have been conducted in different regions of Sweden with young men and women from different social groups. The groups are composed of naturally existing networks of friends. Excerpts from feature films showing young people in various typical drinking situations have directed the group discussions. In the paper an analysis of the group’s perception of heavy drinking and alcohol problems is presented. The results indicate that how they speak of their own drinking is of importance for how they perceive the transition in others from being heavy drinkers to having alcohol problems. Keywords: young adults, alcohol, focus groups SESSION: 12.2 Salme AHLSTRÖM, Leena Metso, Eeva Liisa Tuovinen Alcohol and Drug Research, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland FAMILY VALUES AND US E OF LEGAL AND ILLEGAL DRUGS AMONG YOUTH Aims. This paper examines the role of family values in use of legal and illegal drugs among youth. Adolescents’ use of tobacco, alcohol and drugs is related to many factors, from genetic and psychological to social and environmental factors. Family is one of the most important domains, which is influencing adolescent's behavior. To examine family values is therefore of great importance when we want to understand to which factors the use of legal and illegal drugs are related in adolescents. The relationship between integration of family life, values and use of alcohol and other drugs among Finnish students are examined.
    [Show full text]
  • (Former) Schlitz Brewery-Tied House 1944 N
    EXHIBIT A LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT (Former) Schlitz Brewery-Tied House 1944 N. Oakley Ave. Final Landmark Recommendation adopted by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, July 7, 2011 CITY OF CHICAGO Rahm Emanuel, Mayor Department of Housing and Economic Development Andrew J. Mooney, Commissioner Bureau of Planning and Zoning Historic Preservation Division The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor and City Council, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. The Commission is responsible for recommend- ing to the City Council which individual buildings, sites, objects, or districts should be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The landmark designation process begins with a staff study and a preliminary summary of information related to the potential designation criteria. The next step is a preliminary vote by the landmarks commission as to whether the proposed landmark is worthy of consideration. This vote not only initiates the formal designation process, but it places the review of city permits for the property under the jurisdiction of the Commission until a final landmark recommendation is acted on by the City Council. This Landmark Designation Report is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation process. Only language contained within a designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. (Former) Schlitz Brewery-Tied House 1944 N. Oakley Ave. Date: 1898 Architect: Kley & Lang The former Schlitz Brewery-Tied House at 1944 N. Oakley Avenue is one of the best- remaining examples of the architecturally distinctive Chicago taverns built by breweries around the turn of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • SSAGA-I Specifications
    Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism Specifications Louise J. Laster Ines G. Janca Kathleen K. Bucholz, Ph. D. and Interviewers from all C.O.G.A. sites: S.U.N.Y Brooklyn: Cynthia Purcell U. Connecticut: Linda Mahoney Michelle Slivinsky U.C. San Diego: Nancy Bacon Estee Shapiro U. Indiana: Carolyn York Donna Clair U. Iowa: Angie Cookman Ellen Kapp Washington University: Laura Kaplan Revised 1/20/93 SSAGA: GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS The Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism (SSAGA) is an instrument designed to assess physical, psychological and social manifestations of alcohol abuse or dependence and other psychiatric disorders. It is a semi- structured interview which capitalizes on prior research in psychiatric epidemiology. As such, it relies heavily on items previously validated by other research interviews, including DIS, CIDI, HELPER, SAM, SADS, and SCID. FORMAT: The interview is formatted with an index in the left margin, questions in the center, and coding space in the right margin. The index is there to refer questions to the respective criteria in the respective diagnostic systems. Since the SSAGA is polydiagnostic, the left margin codes will reveal which diagnostic system, and which particular criterion each question covers. The following key applies: DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS: 3R = DSM-III-R DSM = DSM-III FGN = Feighner RDC = Research Diagnostic Criteria ICD = ICD-10 SYMPTOM CRITERIA: These appear at the end of the index code: e.g. AD3RA4 = Alcohol Dependence, DSM-III-R system, criterion A, item 4. RDCALC = Research Diagnostic Criteria system, Alcohol DSMALC = DSM-III, Alcohol FGNALCC2= Feighner system, Alcohol, criterion C, item 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Rheingold Case
    Case Number : MKT03-02 Date: May 2003 Rheingold Beer “This is a classic brand, not a retro brand” – Tom Bendheim, CEO Rheingold Beer In early May 2003, Tom Bendheim, CEO sat in his office staring out the window at his company’s billboards at the corners of Houston Street and Avenue B in New York City’s Lower East Side. Faced with the task of trying to reinvigorate what was once “New York’s beer”, he wondered if the Rheingold brand could enjoy the same popularity it once experienced almost half a century earlier. As the newly minted CEO of Rheingold beer he was confident that he could make this brand come alive once again. He had done it with other products, why not this one? However, the beer industry was a mature, and highly competitive market. As he headed out the door to meet a prospective new client who he hoped would begin to sell Rheingold beer, Tom grappled with a number of issues, not knowing which to direct his attention to first. The History of Rheingold Beer Rheingold beer traces its roots (Exhibit 1) back to 1840 in Ludwigsburg, Germany where the company’s founder, Samuel Liebman (original spelling: Liebmann)1 founded the Liebman Brewery. In 1850, Joseph Liebman, Samuel’s eldest son, immigrated to the US to escape political persecution in Germany. Upon arrival in the US, Joseph bought a small brewery in Brooklyn, NY thus establishing a “home base” for the rest of the family when they emigrated from Germany. When the family realized that they could compete in New York’s competitive beer market, they built an even larger brewery on the corner of Forest and Bremen Street in Brooklyn.
    [Show full text]
  • PHN Webinar 3 D&A
    Assist D&A (& comorbid MH) primary care treatment AMANDA Assist - D&A (& comorbid MH) Professor Amanda Baker Conjoint Professor Adrian Dunlop Andrew Taylor Clinical Psychologist & Area Director, Drug & Alcohol Clinical Nurse Consultant, Academic, UoN) Clinical Services, HNE Health Drug & Alcohol Clinical Services, HNE Health Amanda Amanda AMANDA Re-cap: ASK - 6th Feb 2018 Ask • Substance use is common in GP setting • How to approach patients: SNAP, other Drugs • What, how oFten, how much, how? • Substance use DisorDer: harmFul use or DepenDence? • Co-morbidities • (screening tools e.g. AUDIT – alcohol) AMANDA Re-cap: ADVISE - 13th March 2018 Advise • Brief interventions: effective • Motivational Interviewing • Ambivalence • Nursing role in drug and alcohol, SNAP • Patient’s motivation to change • Goals setting AMANDA Assist • Treatment is effective • Combination of pharmacotherapy and counselling effective • Treatment may need to be longer and repeated as the person may not have made as many change attempts • Context of stress management is important (overlap of symptoms of mental illness and withdrawal) AMANDA Assist • Monitor mental health symptoms and smoking, alcohol and other drug use; adverse side effects of psychotropic medication • Refer to Quitline; D&A Services etc and maintain ongoing relationship • At the beginning of treatment sometimes mental health symptoms can seem a bit worse – talk about this, normalize it, monitor • People begin to feel mentally and physically better AMANDA Assist • Sustaining change – grief (show understanding,
    [Show full text]
  • GABINETE ADJUNTO DE CRISIS 12 De Marzo, 1947
    GABINETE ADJUNTO DE CRISIS CIA La Guerra Fria 12 de Marzo, 1947 [email protected] Presidente: Luisa M​ú​nera Vice Presidente Tomás Tobón 1 Tabla de contenidos 1. Cartas de los Presidentes 2. Manual de Procedimientos GAC 3. Propósito del Comité: 3.1 ¿Qué es un GAC? 3.2 ¿Por qué es importante? 4. Composición 4.1 Gabinetes: 4.2 Sala de Crisis: 5. La Guerra Fria 5.1 Introducción: 5.2 Antecedentes Históricos: 5.3 Historia de la CIA 6. ​¿​Que sucede en 1947? 7. Cargos 7.1 Presidente de Los Estados Unidos 7.2 Jefe de Justicia 7.3 Secretario del Interior 7.4 Secretario del Tesoro 7.5 Director de la CIA 7.6 Senador 7.7 Jefe del Estado Mayor del Ejército 7.8 Jefe del Estado Mayor de La fuerza Aérea 8. Lista de personajes: 8.1 Harry S. Truman 8.2 Hoyt Vandenberg 2 8.3 Douglas Mackiernan 8.4 Richard G. Fecteau 8.5 Oscar L. Chapman 8.6 Chiyoki Ikeda 8.7 Lucius D. Clay 8.8 Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter 8.9 Alben W. Barkley 8.10 Louis A. Johnson 8.11 John L. Sullivan 8.12 Joseph Lawton Collins 8.13 William Morrow Fechteler 8.14 John W. Snyder 8.15 Kenneth McKellar 8. Preguntas al Delegado 9. Enlaces Utiles 10. Bibliografia 1. Cartas de los Presidentes Estimados delegados del GAC de la CIA Llevo alrededor de cinco años participando en modelos de la ONU y puedo decir que son unas de las experiencias que más me han formado tanto como persona como estudiante.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (January 1992) \ Wisconsin Word Processing Format (Approved 1/92) United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900A). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 11. Name of Property historic name Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company Brewery Complex other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number 219 West Galena Street N/A not for publication city or town Milwaukee N/A vicinity state Wisconsin code WI county Milwaukee code 79 zip code 53212 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant nationally statewide X locally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Stress and Placebo Alcohol on Cognitive Activation and Inhibitory Control in Male Problem Gamblers and Problem Gamblers with Alcohol Use Disorder
    The Effects of Stress and Placebo Alcohol on Cognitive Activation and Inhibitory Control in Male Problem Gamblers and Problem Gamblers with Alcohol Use Disorder by Lindsay Steinberg A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements For the degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Toronto © copyright by Lindsay Steinberg (2009) Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-59601-2 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-59601-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • EXAMINING PROHIBITION in 1920S USA Michael Sweet School of Law
    A MEASURE OF SUCCESS: EXAMINING PROHIBITION IN 1920s USA Michael Sweet School of Law Murdoch University This thesis is presented for the degree of Master of Laws by Research Murdoch University, 2017 ii Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary educational institution. Michael Sweet 2017 iii Abstract In 1919, a policy to ban alcoholic beverages was entrenched by Congress into the Constitution - the 18th Amendment. Congressmen Andrew Volstead proceeded to promote the enacting legislation in the United States House of Representatives, and the National Prohibition Act became law. Does Prohibition deserve its overwhelming condemnation as a failure? How successful was the Act’s implementation? After the introduction, part two discusses the theories and perceptions that serve to shape the debate over alcohol prohibition. To measure its success, the Act is then examined according to its outcomes - part three of the thesis assesses the anticipated increase in economic prosperity through the metrics of government revenue, business activity, workplace attendance, wages and sales figures. Part four scrutinises the production and supply of alcohol, prison populations, drunkenness, crime rates and corruption. The success of a reform is also found in how it shapes the nation. Prohibition’s economic and political effects are briefly noted, as is its influence upon policing and the judiciary. The 21st Amendment repealing alcohol prohibition functioned to skew reporting of the Prohibition era, serving the purposes of ideologues and business opportunists. The thesis concludes that the reform was not defeated by any inherent impossibility, but rather by a lack of skilfully wielded political will.
    [Show full text]
  • DESIGN FEATURES of OLDER BANKNOTES (For Series 1988A and Older)
    DESIGN FEATURES OF OLDER BANKNOTES (for Series 1988A and older) www.fraudfighter.com 800.883.8822 This guide will help you authenticate Federal Reserve Notes Series 1928-1988A. There are four steps you should take to authenticate these notes: 1) Check for raised printing • This is the only security feature that is found on these notes. The raised printing feature is discussed on the page 6. 2) Make sure that lines and points on the bill are distinct and unbroken • Depending on the sophisication of the counterfeit, lines and points may be unclear and/or blurry. However, modern printing technology has become advanced and afford able enough that a great deal of counterfeits have distinct and unbroken lines and points, which is why you should also: 3) Check that the paper that the bill is printed on does not glow under UV light • The paper that real money is printed on absorbs light as opposed to reflecting it, which gives it a dull appearance under UV light. However, a favored method of counterfeiting money is to bleach lower denominations, such as a $1 bill, and print higher denominations, such as a $20 bill, onto of it; such a counterfeit would look like a real bill under UV light, which is why you should also: 4) Know what the denominations look like and know when major design changes occurred • It is helpful to know when major design changes occurred so that you do not turn away a real bill; just because a design on an old bill is slightly different than what you’re used to for more modern bills does not necessarily mean that it is fake.
    [Show full text]