DOCSLIB.ORG

Montipora Capitata: Lesion Prevalence Vs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montipora Capitata: Lesion Prevalence Vs Coral Disease Prevalence of Coconut Island: a Temporal Study between 2007-08 and 2011 Stephan Bitterwolf1, Greta Aeby Ph.D.2 & Marilyn Brandt Ph.D.1 1University of the Virgin Islands 2Hawai’i Institute of Marine Biology Introduction Lesion Types Results: Change in Host Abundance Disease Prevalence vs. Size Conclusions Montipora capitata: lesion prevalence vs. size class Community change in relationship to disease • Coral reefs cover less than 0.1% of the ocean surface area • PTLS and PorTrem lesion prevalence showed significant 1 and harbor up to 25% of all marine fish species. This effects of Year and Site (Fig 4). • Due to the low coral species diversity in Hawaii, 0.9 ecosystem provides humans services valued at • MC and PC showed significant effects of site, year and disease can have great implications for benthic approximately $US375 billion worldwide (NOAA, 2010) . interaction between site and year (Table 1, Fig 5 & 6). At 0.8 composition/community structure, consequently sites H & I a decrease in MC and corresponding increase in 0.7 affecting the* productivity of the coral reef • Coral disease occurrence is on the rise and, working in PC relative abundance was observed between 2007 & ecosystem. synergism with other stressors, has caused an estimated 0.6 2011. 27% coral cover loss worldwide (Sutherland et al., 2004) 0.5 • Montipora capitata is structurally more complex • For all other species, abundances were low and no obvious than Porites compressa. At two of the sites with Hawaii exhibits low coral species diversity. Thus its coral Prevalence 0.4 • temporal trends were observed between site or year. the highest starting M. capitata abundances, M. ecosystem could be severely impacted by coral disease. 0.3 capitata declined while P. compressa increased. • In 2007-2008 Williams et al. (2010) conducted a disease Temporal Lesion Prevalence 0.2 0.5 • Disease may have affected these sites more abundance survey on the reefs of Coconut Island, Oahu, 0.45 0.1 0.4 significantly because of higher starting host Hawaii. The area has since been subjected to many disease * 0 0.35 densities. The observed change in species outbreaks including a recent outbreak of Montipora white 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0.3 composition could mean a decrease in rugosity or syndrome. In 2011, we conducted an identical survey to 0.25 2011 Average Size (cm) habitat space necessary for other species’ survival. 0.2 2007 Fig 7: MWS prevalence vs. average colony size with 1st order that of Williams et al. to determine whether community 0.15 structure has changed and what community factors may be Prevalence regression fit. Disease levels as a function of site and time 0.1 * related to disease. 0.05 0 Porites compressa: lesion prevalence vs. size class • PorTrem and PTLS showed significant effect of STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Coral community structure has MWS PTLS PGA Bleaching PorTrem 1 site and time. This may indicate an epizootic lesion changed in response to increased disease outbreaks and Lesion 0.9 outbreak and is not conclusive for lesion ± coral disease is associated with community factors Fig 4: Lesion prevalence ( SEM) by year of survey. 0.8 prevalence* at other times of the year. * indicates significant difference including coral cover and size structure. 0.7 Relationships between community factors and disease 0.6 * Table 1: F Ratio and P value by Species, Site, Year and • PTLS prevalence vs. abundance showed increasing Methods Interaction between Site & Year 0.5 * 0.4 trend with Porites compressa abundance indicating Prevalence that it may be a population dynamic lesion. • 8 sites within an 800 m2 area were surveyed around 0.3 Coconut Island (Fig 1). 0.2 • Lesion prevalence was found to increase with size 0.1 for all diseases except BLwTL. This may Each site was surveyed with 5 transects, 2x10m each. • 0 correspond to a greater surface area of contact and • Transects were surveyed for Colony Size/Species & Lesion 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 increased exposure time to factors leading to lesion Average Size (cm) Presence/Type. development (e.g., predation, pathogens, PTLS PGA PorTrem bleaching, parasitism). • Lesions documented included predation, Porites tissue Results: Relationship to Community Factors Fig 8: Prevalence of PTLS, PGA and PorTrem on Poritids vs. average Overall Conclusions loss, Montipora white syndrome, Porites and Montiporid st nd Fig 2: Coral lesions colony size with corresponding 1 and 2 order regression fits. growth anomalies, Porites bleaching with tissue loss, and • PTLS prevalence was significantly related to P. compressa • Results from this study will aid in the A: Montipora Growth Anomaly B: Montipora White Syndrome Porites trematodiasis (Fig 2: A-G). abundances (F = 6.109, p < 0.05, arcsin-root transformation All Species: lesion prevalence vs. size class identification of important factors influencing C: Bleaching with Tissue Loss D: Porites Tissue Loss 1 • Species abundance/disease prevalence was statistically applied). No other relationships were found between coral disease and community change in coral reef E: Porites Trematodiasis F: Predation 0.9 analyzed using 2 way-ANOVAs investigating the effect of disease prevalence and host abundances. communities. Understanding the dynamics of G: Porites Growth Anomaly 0.8 site and time. • All lesions, except BlwTL, exhibited significant disease among* heterogeneous coral reef habitats relationships between size class and prevalence (Table 2, 0.7 can provide insight into how disease acts within • Lesion vs. abundance (density and cover) and lesion vs. Figures 7-9). 0.6 complex communities. size class were analyzed with linear or polynomial Results: Frequency of Disease 0.5 regressions to investigate relationships. 0.4 Prevalence References * • In all, 6189 coral colonies of 4 species (Fungia scutaria Table 2: Regression formulas for lesions as a function of 0.3 NOAA. NOAA: Heat Stress to Caribbean Corals in 2005 (FC), Montipora capitata (MC), Pocillopora damicornis colony size. * significant regression,** low sample size Worst on Record. 15 11 2010. 10 09 2011 Coconut Island, Oahu, Hawaii 0.2 <http://www.noaanews.noaa.govstories2010/20101115_coralbleaching.html>. (PD) and Porites compressa (PC)) were surveyed from Indo-Pacific zooxanthellate corals .” MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES (2004): 273-302. 0.1 Williams GJ, Aeby GS, Cowie ROM, Davy SK (2010) Predictive Modeling of Coral July-August, 2011. Disease Distribution within a Reef System. PLoS ONE 5(2): e9264. doi:10.1371/ 0 journal.pone.0009264Kathryn P. Sutherland*, James W. Porter, Cecilia Torres. • 2654 colonies (43%) exhibited one of the following lesion 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 "Disease and immunity in Caribbean and Average Size (cm) types: 929 predation, 58 bleaching, 8 bleaching with tissue loss (BLwTL), 158 Montipora white syndrome (MWS), Bleaching BLwTL Predation Acknowledgements 257 Porites growth anomaly (PGA), 171 Porites tissue loss Fig 9: Prevalence of bleaching, BLwTL and predation lesions vs. size This project was sponsored by NIH MARC Grant # 5T34GM008422. (PTLS), 1068 Porites trematodiasis (PorTrem), 5 class with corresponding linear regressions. These conditions affected Great appreciation goes to: Dr. Teresa Turner, Amanda Wright, Dr. Marilyn Montipora growth anomaly (MGA) (Fig 3). all species. Brandt, Dr. Williams, Dr. Greta Aeby & the HIMB Coral Disease Lab Disease Prevalence Montipora capitata Densities Between Survey Years Porites compressa Densities Between Survey Years 0.6 1 1 0.5 0.8 * * 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.6 * * 0.2 Prevalence 0.4 2007 0.4 2007 0.1 2011 2011 0.2 0.2 0.0 % % Abundance Coral 0 % Abundance Coral 0 A B C D G H I J A B C D G H I J Site Site Fig 3: Average disease prevalence (± SEM) for all sites Fig 1: Site locations around Coconut Island, Oahu, Hawaii. combined in 2011 Fig 5 & 6: Relative abundnaces (± SEM) of Montipora capitata and Porites compressa by site in 2007 and 2011. * Indicates significant difference determined by post-hoc tests..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist of CITES Listed Coral Species Part II
    CoP16 Doc. 43.1 (Rev. 1) Annex 5.2 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of CITES listed Coral Species Part II CORAL SPECIES AND SYNONYMS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED IN THE UNEP‐WCMC DATABASE 1. Scleractinia families Family Name Accepted Name Species Author Nomenclature Reference Synonyms ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrolhosensis Veron, 1985 Veron (2000) Madrepora crassa Milne Edwards & Haime, 1860; ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrotanoides (Lamarck, 1816) Veron (2000) Madrepora abrotanoides Lamarck, 1816; Acropora mangarevensis Vaughan, 1906 ACROPORIDAE Acropora aculeus (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora aculeus Dana, 1846 Madrepora acuminata Verrill, 1864; Madrepora diffusa ACROPORIDAE Acropora acuminata (Verrill, 1864) Veron (2000) Verrill, 1864; Acropora diffusa (Verrill, 1864); Madrepora nigra Brook, 1892 ACROPORIDAE Acropora akajimensis Veron, 1990 Veron (2000) Madrepora coronata Brook, 1892; Madrepora ACROPORIDAE Acropora anthocercis (Brook, 1893) Veron (2000) anthocercis Brook, 1893 ACROPORIDAE Acropora arabensis Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora aspera Dana, 1846; Acropora cribripora (Dana, 1846); Madrepora cribripora Dana, 1846; Acropora manni (Quelch, 1886); Madrepora manni ACROPORIDAE Acropora aspera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Quelch, 1886; Acropora hebes (Dana, 1846); Madrepora hebes Dana, 1846; Acropora yaeyamaensis Eguchi & Shirai, 1977 ACROPORIDAE Acropora austera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora austera Dana, 1846 ACROPORIDAE Acropora awi Wallace & Wolstenholme, 1998 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora azurea Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora batunai Wallace, 1997 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bifurcata Nemenzo, 1971 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora branchi Riegl, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora brueggemanni Brook, 1891; Isopora ACROPORIDAE Acropora brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) Veron (2000) brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bushyensis Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) Acropora fasciculare Latypov, 1992 ACROPORIDAE Acropora cardenae Wells, 1985 Veron (2000) CoP16 Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Scleractinian Reef Corals: Identification Notes
    SCLERACTINIAN REEF CORALS: IDENTIFICATION NOTES By JACKIE WOLSTENHOLME James Cook University AUGUST 2004 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.51205 http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.51205 Scleractinian Reef Corals: Identification Notes by Jackie Wolstenholme is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 2 FAMILY ACROPORIDAE.................................................................................................................................... 3 Montipora ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Massive/thick plates/encrusting & tuberculae/papillae ................................................................................... 3 Montipora monasteriata .............................................................................................................................. 3 Massive/thick plates/encrusting & papillae ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cnidarian Immunity and the Repertoire of Defense Mechanisms in Anthozoans
    biology Review Cnidarian Immunity and the Repertoire of Defense Mechanisms in Anthozoans Maria Giovanna Parisi 1,* , Daniela Parrinello 1, Loredana Stabili 2 and Matteo Cammarata 1,* 1 Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.G.P.); [email protected] (M.C.) Received: 10 August 2020; Accepted: 4 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: Anthozoa is the most specious class of the phylum Cnidaria that is phylogenetically basal within the Metazoa. It is an interesting group for studying the evolution of mutualisms and immunity, for despite their morphological simplicity, Anthozoans are unexpectedly immunologically complex, with large genomes and gene families similar to those of the Bilateria. Evidence indicates that the Anthozoan innate immune system is not only involved in the disruption of harmful microorganisms, but is also crucial in structuring tissue-associated microbial communities that are essential components of the cnidarian holobiont and useful to the animal’s health for several functions including metabolism, immune defense, development, and behavior. Here, we report on the current state of the art of Anthozoan immunity. Like other invertebrates, Anthozoans possess immune mechanisms based on self/non-self-recognition. Although lacking adaptive immunity, they use a diverse repertoire of immune receptor signaling pathways (PRRs) to recognize a broad array of conserved microorganism-associated molecular patterns (MAMP). The intracellular signaling cascades lead to gene transcription up to endpoints of release of molecules that kill the pathogens, defend the self by maintaining homeostasis, and modulate the wound repair process.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses of Branching Reef Corals Acropora Digitifera and Montipora
    Responses of branching reef corals Acropora digitifera and Montipora digitata to elevated temperature and pCO2 Cristiana Manullang1, Intan Herwindra Millyaningrum1, Akira Iguchi2, Aika Miyagi3, Yasuaki Tanaka4, Yukihiro Nojiri5,6 and Kazuhiko Sakai7 1 Graduate School of Engineering and Science, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan 2 Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 3 Department of Bioresources Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Okinawa College, Nago-City, Ok- inawa, Japan 4 Environmental and Life Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam 5 Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 6 Graduate School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan 7 Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Motobu, Okinawa, Japan ABSTRACT Anthropogenic emission of CO2 into the atmosphere has been increasing exponentially, causing ocean acidification (OA) and ocean warming (OW). The ``business-as-usual'' scenario predicts that the atmospheric concentration of CO2 may exceed 1,000 matm and seawater temperature may increase by up to 3 ◦C by the end of the 21st century. Increases in OA and OW may negatively affect the growth and survival of reef corals. In the present study, we separately examined the effects of OW and OA on the corals Acropora digitifera and Montipora digitata, which are dominant
    [Show full text]
  • Scleractinia Fauna of Taiwan I
    Scleractinia Fauna of Taiwan I. The Complex Group 台灣石珊瑚誌 I. 複雜類群 Chang-feng Dai and Sharon Horng Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University Published by National Taiwan University, No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan Table of Contents Scleractinia Fauna of Taiwan ................................................................................................1 General Introduction ........................................................................................................1 Historical Review .............................................................................................................1 Basics for Coral Taxonomy ..............................................................................................4 Taxonomic Framework and Phylogeny ........................................................................... 9 Family Acroporidae ............................................................................................................ 15 Montipora ...................................................................................................................... 17 Acropora ........................................................................................................................ 47 Anacropora .................................................................................................................... 95 Isopora ...........................................................................................................................96 Astreopora ......................................................................................................................99
    [Show full text]
  • Hermatypic Coral Fauna of Subtropical Southeast Africa: a Checklist!
    Pacific Science (1996), vol. 50, no. 4: 404-414 © 1996 by University of Hawai'i Press. All rights reserved Hermatypic Coral Fauna of Subtropical Southeast Africa: A Checklist! 2 BERNHARD RrnGL ABSTRACT: The South African hermatypic coral fauna consists of 96 species in 42 scleractinian genera, one stoloniferous octocoral genus (Tubipora), and one hermatypic hydrocoral genus (Millepora). There are more species in southern Mozambique, with 151 species in 49 scleractinian genera, one stolo­ niferous octocoral (Tubipora musica L.), and one hydrocoral (Millepora exaesa [Forskal)). The eastern African coral faunas of Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique, and South Africa are compared and Southeast Africa dis­ tinguished as a biogeographic subregion, with six endemic species. Patterns of attenuation and species composition are described and compared with those on the eastern boundaries of the Indo-Pacific in the Pacific Ocean. KNOWLEDGE OF CORAL BIODIVERSITY in the Mason 1990) or taxonomically inaccurate Indo-Pacific has increased greatly during (Boshoff 1981) lists of the corals of the high­ the past decade (Sheppard 1987, Rosen 1988, latitude reefs of Southeast Africa. Sheppard and Sheppard 1991 , Wallace and In this paper, a checklist ofthe hermatypic Pandolfi 1991, 1993, Veron 1993), but gaps coral fauna of subtropical Southeast Africa, in the record remain. In particular, tropical which includes the southernmost corals of and subtropical subsaharan Africa, with a Maputaland and northern Natal Province, is rich and diverse coral fauna (Hamilton and evaluated and compared with a checklist of Brakel 1984, Sheppard 1987, Lemmens 1993, the coral faunas of southern Mozambique Carbone et al. 1994) is inadequately docu­ (Boshoff 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Coral Reefs Status with Particular Reference to Kish Island, Persian Gulf
    International Coral Reef Initiative Indian Ocean Regional Workshop, Muzambique, Nov. 26-28, 2001 IRANIAN CORAL REEFS STATUS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO KISH ISLAND, PERSIAN GULF 1 2 SEYED MOHAMMAD REZA FATEMI , MOHAMMAD REZA SHOKRI 1Dept. of Fisheries and Marine Biology, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Hesarak, PO BOX: 14155-5655, Tehran, IRAN. Email: <[email protected]> 2Iranian National Center for Oceanography, #51, Bozorgmehr Ave., I4168, PO BOX: 14155- 4781, Tehran, IRAN. Email: <[email protected]> Abstract In this paper, the coral status of Iranian waters in the Persian Gulf are reviewed and discussed based on the obtained results and information after three years of field surveys in Nay Band Bay, Kish and Farur islands. Altogether, 27 species of corals were identified from the studied areas, belonging to 9 families and 20 genera. Faviidae with 6 genera and 8 species is the most diverse of all families. On the other hand, Poritidae with 2 genera and 4 species is the most abundant corals in all areas. In the last 10 years, Acropora has declined from being the most abundant genus in shallow waters of fringing islands, to almost absennt, due to environmental stresses and human impacts. Anacropora forbesi is reported for the first time from the area. Regarding the coral health, the live coral coverage ranges from 9 to 30%, with minimum coverage in Kish Island and maximum in Nay Band Bay. During this study, no new bleached coral was observed at the surveyed areas, though in the past few years, considerable bleaching events have occurred throughout the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of Astreopora (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Scleractinia) from the Mid-Pacific!
    Pacific Science (1980), vol. 34, no. 3 © 1981 by The University Press of Hawaii. All rights reserved Two New Species of Astreopora (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Scleractinia) from the Mid-Pacific! AUSTIN E. LAMBERTS 2 THE GENUS Astreopora de Blainville 1830, an encrusting reef coral, is found throughout the Indo-Pacific, east to the Tuamotus, and is represented in all major coral collections from the Indo-Pacific (Wells 1954). In shal­ low water it is often inconspicuous and never predominates. At times it may form heads 2 m or more across, and in deeper waters it may be very common. About eight species can be readily identified and to these two previously unreported species are herein de­ scribed. Type specimens have been deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. SPECIES DESCRIPTION Astreopora cucullata species novum Figures 1-4 The original specimen was chiseled from the edge of a 30-cm low, rounded colony embedded on the reef slope in 3 m clear water at the end of the Aua line in Pago Pago harbor, Tutuila, American Samoa, 27 July 1973 (Dahl and Lamberts 1977). Rock substrate with 25 percent coral cover was amid strong currents. Coenosarc .rusty brown in situ. Holotype measures 13+ x 8 x 4cm; weight 142.7 g; volume 132.1 cm 3 . Corallites rather evenly spaced, round or distorted ovals with an average diameter of 1.5 mm. At times two or three openings are FIGURE I. Astreopora eueullata species novum: ho­ lotype, t natural size. separated by a single thecal wall. Never more than 5 mm between adjacent calix centers and about 6.2 corallites per square Similar studies show the more common centimeter.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE HISTORY STUDIES of Montipora Digitata in PIONEER BAY, NORTH QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA
    Journal of Coastal Development ISSN : 1410-5217 Volume 15, Number 1, October 2011 : 72 - 81 Accredited : 83/Dikti/Kep/2009 Original Paper LIFE HISTORY STUDIES OF Montipora digitata IN PIONEER BAY, NORTH QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA Esti Harpeni 1 and Arthur Lemuel David2 Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung 1Jl. Prof. S. Brojonegoro No. 1 Gegung Meneng, Bandar Lampung 35128, Indonesia 2School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University Alumni Received: October, 22, 2010 ; Accepted : May, 10, 2011 ABSTRACT Intertidal zone in reef flat is the extreme condition for many species of corals. Periodical tides, wave action and sedimentation become the main challenging factors which usually avoided by most of coral species. However, Montipora digitata is the species that found abundant in these conditions. Having relatively small and short-lived colony, forced this species to find the strategy to survive and maintain the energy efficiently. Understanding biology and life history of M. digitata in the coral reefs is the key to understanding how this species can adapt to the extreme conditions. The biology and life history of this study focused on the population size structure, reproduction, competitive interactions, investment repair and maintain and types of selection. M. digitata leaded to productivity as a strategy to cope with any extreme condition. This pattern relatively matched with r-and S-R selection. Key words: Environmental extremes ; life history ; Montipora digitata ; tolerance Correspondence: Phone: +62 721 261058; Fax: +62 721 770347; E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Major reef framework builders (hard corals and The habitat of this species is often categorized soft corals) dominated reefs in the Pioneer Bay, as the marginal reefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 541:123
    Vol. 541: 123–134, 2015 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published December 15 doi: 10.3354/meps11512 Mar Ecol Prog Ser FREEREE ACCESSCCESS Effects of pCO2 on spatial competition between the corals Montipora aequituberculata and Porites lutea Nicolas R. Evensen1,3,*, Peter J. Edmunds1, Kazuhiko Sakai2 1Department of Biology, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330-8303, USA 2Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Sesoko, Motobu, Okinawa 905-0227, Japan 3Present address: Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia ABSTRACT: We tested the hypothesis that ocean acidification (OA) affects spatial competition among scleractinian corals. Competitive ability was evaluated indirectly by linear extension of Porites lutea and Montipora aequituberculata placed in intraspecific, interspecific, and control pairings (paired with dead coral skeleton) and exposed to ambient (~400 µatm) and elevated (~1000 µatm) pCO2 in experiments conducted in Moorea, French Polynesia, and Okinawa, Japan. High pCO2 had no effect on linear extension of M. aequituberculata in Moorea, but in Okinawa, it reduced linear extension 37%; high pCO2 had no significant effect on linear extension of P. lutea in Okinawa. Much of the negative effect of high pCO2 on linear extension for M. aequituberculata in Okinawa was due to reduced extension in control pairings, with corals engaged in intra- and interspecific competition unaffected by OA. Linear extension of M. aequituberculata and P. lutea in interspecific pairings decreased relative to control pairings at ambient pCO2 by 39 and 71%, respectively, indicating a strong effect of competition on extension rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level and Its Effects on Reefs in Hawaiÿi
    CHAPTER 5 Reef Fringing i ÿ Reef Corals and the Coral Reefs of South Molokaÿi Paul L. Jokiel1, Eric K. Brown2, Kuÿulei S. Rodgers1, and William R. Smith1 ich and diverse marine benthic habitats exist along much of the conditions and changes over time. Corals are the keystone species that of reef-forming corals on the reefs of south Molokaÿi. They are the “rice south Molokaÿi coral reef, as demonstrated by maps of the area form the reef framework through secretion of limestone skeletons. The corals” Montipora capitata (previously known as Montipora verrucosa), R(see Cochran, this vol., chap. 9 for a complete discussion of benthic abundance and diversity of reef fish are directly related to coral commu- and Montipora patula; the “finger coral” Porites compressa; the massive Character of the South Moloka habitats). Habitats that support corals generally contain a characteristic nity development (see Friedlander and Rodgers, this vol., chap. 7 for a “lobe coral” Porites lobata; and the “cauliflower coral” Pocillopora mean- assemblage of coral species that can be referred to as a “coral community.” complete discussion of reef fish on Molokaÿi). The ecological importance, drina. South Molokaÿi reefs are also inhabited by a number of other species Composition of each coral community is controlled by numerous environ- economic value, and environmental sensitivity of corals make them ideal of reef-forming and soft corals that range in abundance from rare to com- mental factors that influence recruitment, growth, and mortality of each subjects for monitoring and assessment efforts. Brown and others (this vol., mon. These species increase biodiversity, have great aesthetic value, and are component species.
    [Show full text]