Agenda Item No. 10 WEST OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Agenda Item No. 10 WEST OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL CABINET 14 OCTOBER 2015 INVESTING IN THE A40 REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING AND STRATEGIC HOUSING (Contact: Giles Hughes, Tel: (01993) 862170) (The Cabinet’s decision on this matter will be a resolution) 1. PURPOSE To consider West Oxfordshire District Council’s response to the Oxfordshire County Council’s recent consultation ‘Investing in the A40’. The County Council is seeking views on the longer term solution for the A40 corridor. A copy of a draft response is included in Appendix 1. 2. RECOMMENDATION That the Cabinet approves the draft response letter as West Oxfordshire District Council’s response, subject to any amendments that Cabinet wishes to make. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1. Oxfordshire County Council started a consultation on the longer term solution for the A40 on the 26th September. A copy of the consultation paper is attached to this report in Appendix 2. 3.2. The A40 is an important route linking Gloucestershire and South Wales with London via the M40. It plays a critical role for West Oxfordshire by linking a number of the largest settlements with Oxford and other important employment areas. The A40 is used by a number of key bus routes as well as general traffic. The A40 carries a daily flow of between 23,000 and 30,000 vehicles per day, well above the road's link capacity. This is exacerbated by junction capacity issues at Eynsham/Cassington and Wolvercote. This results in congestion on the route for much of the day, including at weekends. During school term times the average journey speed on the A40 between Cassington and Wolvercote in the morning peak is 17 mph, while on the worst days it can be as low as 10 mph. 3.3. The emerging West Oxfordshire Local Plan acknowledges the importance of the A40 to the district and states that the current problems are acting as a potential constraint to economic growth. The problems on the A40 also lead to the displacement of traffic onto other routes as drivers seek an alternative. This increases the number of cars using the A4095 through Long Hanborough and Bladon adversely affecting these communities. 3.4. The County Council has been provisionally awarded £35 million from the Government's Local Growth Fund for public transport improvements in the A40 corridor in the short to medium term. These improvements are timetabled for delivery between 2019 and 2021 and include: Item No. 10, Page 1 of 5 An eastbound bus lane between Eynsham Roundabout and the Duke's Cut, Wolvercote; Westbound bus priority on the approaches to Cassington traffic signals and Eynsham Roundabout; A Park and Ride car park adjacent to the A40 in Eynsham; and, Junction improvements along the A40 corridor between Witney Bypass and Eynsham Roundabout, including bus priority on the approach to Swinford Toll Bridge. 3.5. The County Council intend to consult on the details of these public transport improvements in autumn 2016. 3.6. The County Council formally adopted Connecting Oxfordshire its Local Transport Plan for 2015-2031 in September 2015. This plan recognises the need for a longer term strategy for improving the A40, beyond the public transport improvements already planned. The objectives for this longer term strategy for the A40 are: To improve travel times and/or journey reliability along the A40 corridor, in particular between Witney/Carterton and Oxford, taking account of future travel needs; To stimulate economic development in line with the Oxfordshire Strategic Economic Plan; and, To reduce the environmental impacts and safety issues along the A40 corridor. 3.7. The Investing in the A40 consultation identifies the following five options for tackling the A40: A40 Bus Lane Guided Busway A40 Dual Carriageway Witney – Oxford Train Witney – Oxford Tram 3.8. The County Council is asking for views on which scheme, or combination of options, should the County Council give top priority to. None of these options are currently funded. The development of a long term strategy will put the County Council in a strong position so that they can move quickly with a bid for government funding when opportunities arise. 3.9. Another option that has been independently suggested by WestOx Monorail Ltd is a Witney to Oxford rapid transit system in the form of a monorail along the A40 corridor. This is not referred to in the County Council’s consultation. 3.10. The consultation runs until Sunday 8th November 2015. Feedback from the consultation will inform a discussion by Oxford County Council’s Cabinet in spring 2016 on the long term strategy for the A40. Item No. 10, Page 2 of 5 4. ALTERNATIVES/OPTIONS A40 Bus Lane – Approximate cost £50 million 4.1. This option would build on from the proposed A40 eastbound bus lane, reducing the cost by £15 million. It would provide 3 metre wide bus lanes in both directions on existing verges between Shores Green and the Duke’s Cut canal. It would create a delay free bus corridor for high frequency services serving a range of origins and destinations. The lanes would normally be restricted to buses but could also be used by emergency vehicles and by other traffic when necessary. Guided Busway – Approximate cost £165 million 4.2. This would be a two-way guided busway track using the line of the old railway from Witney to Cassington, except in Eynsham where the buses would go through the village. The final element of the route would be a guided busway alongside the A40 to the Duke’s Cut canal bridge. This proposal is similar in nature to the operational Cambridge Guided Busway. It would serve high or medium frequency buses serving a wide range of origins and destinations. A40 Dual Carriageway – Approximate cost £120 million 4.3. This involves widening the A40 to 2 lanes in either direction, and requires significant alterations to the junctions at Barnard Gate and Cassington. A central reservation would prevent certain movements and restrict direct access in some cases. The scheme benefits both freight and passenger vehicles. There would be no priority for buses and the currently proposed A40 eastbound bus lane from Eynsham would be removed. The scheme may require an additional ‘North Oxford’ bypass to provide a high standard through route at a cost of £100 million plus. Witney to Oxford Train – Approximate cost £285 million 4.4. A new railway line with new stations at Witney, close to the Ducklington Roundabout, and at Eynsham. The stations would require adequate car parking to act as parkways. The line would connect with the Cotswold line at Yarnton, allowing trains to carry on to Oxford. It would be mainly a single-track diesel railway with double track running through stations. Train frequency would be 1 to 2 trains per hour. An alternative route north of the A40 has also been identified. Witney to Oxford Tram – Approximate cost £240 million 4.5. A new light rail line from Witney, close to the Ducklington Roundabout, through Eynsham towards Oxford. The route would use some of the old railway line alignment and when it reaches the A40 it would either continue to a railway junction at Yarnton, is a joint tram-train operation is permitted, or continue alongside the A40 towards Oxford. Tram stops would require adequate car parking to act as parkways. Tram frequency would be 4 trams per hour in each direction. On-street running would be considered in Witney, Eynsham and North Oxford. Witney to Oxford Monorail – Approximate cost £210 million (WestOx Monorail Ltd estimate) 4.6. This options has not been suggested by the County Council but is proposed by WestOx Monorail Ltd. The route would start at Oxford Hill in Witney, follow the A40 until it reaches the A34 at Wolvercote fly-over and then it would follow the path of the Cotswold rail line into Oxford station. This proposal would (for the most part) utilise the existing verges alongside the A40. It would involve a 4 car transit system with 4 Item No. 10, Page 3 of 5 stations (Oxford Hill Witney, Eynsham, Oxford Northern Gateway and Oxford Railway Station. Key Issues 4.7. One of the objectives for the long term strategy is to improve travel times and/or journey reliability along the A40 corridor. This is a key issue for West Oxfordshire as the current situation undermines the quality of life of residents and economic development. As a largely rural district West Oxfordshire currently has a relatively high percentage of car use and the statistics included in the consultation show that 91% of eastbound journeys on the A40 originate in West Oxfordshire. Consideration therefore needs to be given to whether each of the public transport options would be effective in delivering a modal shift towards public transport use and thereby reduce congestion on the A40. 4.8. All of the options identified have significant costs. These range from £50 million for an A40 bus lane up to £285 million for an Oxford to Witney train line. Inevitably given the magnitude of cost some form of government funding will be needed to help deliver the schemes perhaps supplemented by local sources of funding. 4.9. The longer term strategy needs to promote a solution that is appropriate for the longer term. A particular issue with rail based systems is that they are relatively inflexible. Bus based systems of public transport have greater flexibility to serve a wider range of origins and destinations. 4.10. It is also important that a longer term strategy is developed in a timely manner. A number of significant decisions will be taken in the near future on the details of the Local Growth Fund package and on planning for Oxford’s unmet housing need that need to take into account a longer term strategy for the A40.