DOCSLIB.ORG

Concordia Journal Summer 2015 Volume 41 | Number 3 Concordia Seminary Concordia Seminary Place 801 MO 63105 St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Concordia Journal Summer 2015 Volume 41 | Number 3 Concordia Seminary Concordia Seminary Place 801 MO 63105 St Concordia Seminary Concordia Journal 801 Seminary Place St. Louis, MO 63105 COncordia Summer 2015 Journal volume 41 | number 3 Summer 2015 volume 41 | Word Alive! Connections and Conversations number The New Obedience: An Exegetical Glance at Article VI of the Augsburg Confession 3 Pietism on the American Landscape Sanctification COncordia Journal A BIBLICAL, (ISSN 0145-7233) LUTHERAN VIEW OF HIGHER EDUCATION publisher Faculty Dale A. Meyer David Adams Benjamin Haupt David Peter THAT’S President Charles Arand Erik Herrmann Paul Raabe Andrew Bartelt David Johnson Victor Raj Executive EDITOR Joel Biermann Todd Jones Paul Robinson ROOTED Charles Arand Gerhard Bode Jeffrey Kloha Mark Rockenbach Dean of Theological Kent Burreson David Lewis Robert Rosin IN THE Research and Publication William Carr, Jr. Richard Marrs Timothy Saleska EDITOR Anthony Cook David Maxwell Leopoldo Sánchez M. INTERACTION Travis J. Scholl Timothy Dost Dale Meyer David Schmitt Managing Editor of Thomas Egger Glenn Nielsen Bruce Schuchard OF FAITH Theological Publications Joel Elowsky Joel Okamoto William Schumacher assistant editor Jeffrey Gibbs Jeffrey Oschwald James Voelz Melanie Appelbaum assistants Exclusive subscriber digital access Andrew Hatesohl All correspondence should be sent to: via ATLAS to Concordia Journal & Andrew Jones CONCORDIA JOURNAL Concordia Theology Monthly: Emily Ringelberg 801 Seminary Place http://search.ebscohost.com St. Louis, Missouri 63105 User ID: ATL0102231ps 314-505-7117 Password: subscriber cj @csl.edu Technical problems? Email [email protected] Issued by the faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Missouri, the Concordia Journal is the successor of Lehre und Wehre (1855-1929), begun by C. F. W. Walther, a founder of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. Lehre und Wehre was absorbed by the Concordia Theological Monthly (1930-1974) which was also published by the faculty of Concordia Seminary as the official theological periodical of the Synod. Concordia Journal is abstracted in Internationale Zeitschriftenschau für Bibelwissenschaft unde Grenzgebiete, New Testament Abstracts, Old Testament Abstracts, and Religious and Theological Abstracts. It is indexed in ATLA Religion Database/ATLAS and Christian Periodicals Index. Article and issue photocopies in 16mm microfilm, 35mm microfilm, and 105mm microfiche are available from National Archive Publishing (www.napubco.com). Books submitted for review should be sent to the editor. Manuscripts submitted for publication should cph.org/christianuniversity conform to a Chicago Manual of Style. Email submission ([email protected]) as a Word attachment is preferred. Editorial decisions about submissions include peer review. Manuscripts that display Greek or Hebrew text should utilize BibleWorks fonts (www.bibleworks.com/fonts.html). Copyright © 1994-2009 BibleWorks, LLC. ANDThis LEARNING is an extremely illuminating book that will be of great help to our universities All rights reserved. Used with permission. and to the LCMS as a whole. At a time when synodical universities are struggling with The Concordia Journal (ISSN 0145-7233) is published quarterly (Winter, Spring, Summer, and Fall). The annual “Lutheran Identity,” this book serves as a template for faculty, administrators, boards, subscription rate is $25 (individuals) and $75 (institutions) payable to Concordia Seminary, 801 Seminary Place, and students for how that can be achieved and for how that identity can help colleges St. Louis, MO 63105. New subscriptions and renewals also available at http://store.csl.edu. Periodicals postage to be truly excellent at every level. paid at St. Louis, MO and additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to Concordia Journal, Concordia Seminary, 801 Seminary Place, St. Louis, MO 63105-3199. — Gene Edward Veith, PhD, Professor of Literature, Patrick Henry College © Copyright by Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Missouri 2015 www.csl.edu | www.concordiatheology.org © 2015 Concordia Publishing House Printed in USA 595247_02 595247_02 CJournalAd Sumr.indd 1 5/4/15 8:53 AM COncordia Journal CONTENTS EDITORIALs 189 Editor’s Note 190 Word Alive! Connections and Conversations Dale A. Meyer 195 Ronald R. Feuerhahn: Historian, Theologian, Churchman, Pastor Jon Vieker 198 Encomium for William Carr, Upon His Retirement James W. Voelz ARTICLES 201 The New Obedience: An Exegetical Glance at Article VI of the Augsburg Confession Michael P. Middendorf 220 Pietism on the American Landscape Martin E. Conkling 236 Sanctification David P. Scaer 253 HOMILETICAL HELPS 275 BOOK REVIEWS Summer 2015 volume 41 | number 3 editoRIALS COncordia Journal Editor’s Note This issue publishes the plenary presentations from the 2014 LCMS Theology Professors Conference, which centered around the theme of the “new obedience” of Article VI of the Augsburg Confession. The conference is a regular opportunity for the theologians of the Concordia University System and the two LCMS seminaries to engage in fruitful conversation, to learn from each other in continuing education and lifelong learning. We talk a good game about continuing education, but it doesn’t always seem to gain traction. What would it mean for clergy and church workers to be vitally engaged in lifelong learning? Or, perhaps a better way to put it, what would it look like? Educators and DCEs already know. They are engaged in continuing education as a natural, and in many cases mandatory, part of their vocation. On this score, clergy are behind the curve. Virtually all “learned professions” (the medical professions, law, engineering, et al.) have a process of continuing education built into the exercise of their work. Why not pastors? In a society and culture that is moving with so much velocity, in so many different directions, why would we even want to persist in the myth that every thing we need to know we learned, if not in kindergarten, then in the four years we spent—in what seems like a century ago—earning the degree that made us eligible for a call? We certainly wouldn’t want our primary care physicians to work that way. Why then those involved in the work of Seelsorge? At the heart of a profession that values lifelong learning—whether it is required, encouraged, apprenticed, or simply part of the job—is a deeply personal value for curi- osity. Those who recognize that learning is a formative lifelong process that only ends when they are six feet underground have a vital interest in understanding the world. I am becoming increasingly convinced that the loss of a sense of curiosity is one of the most tragic intellectual symptoms of what many have diagnosed as affluenza. And it happens every time we act as if we know the answer before the question is asked. For Christians, of course, our learning doesn’t even end when we’re six feet under. Its end (telos) is in the certain hope that one day we shall know as fully as we are already fully known (1 Cor 13:12). As such, it should be clergy who model the most vital sense of curiosity, because our curiosity doesn’t just seek to understand the world. We understand more than most that faith alone—fides quarens intellectum—seeks to understand not only the world, but the God who is at work in the world to make all things new. Travis J. Scholl Managing Editor of Theological Publications On the cover: Detail from The Good Samaritan (after Delacroix) by Vincent van Gogh (1890), from a significant body of copies van Gogh executed while he was institutionalized in Saint-Paul asylum in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence (image: Wikimedia Commons). Concordia Journal/Summer 2015 189 Word Alive! Connections and Conversations President Matthew Harrison recently reported to the Concordia Seminary Board of Regents that The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has lost 18 percent of its membership in the last forty years. To be sure, we’re not the only mainline American denomination in serious decline, and cultural and demographic reasons can be cited, but that’s little comfort to a church which has taken the Great Commission seriously since its founding. I’m not setting out on a guilt trip here. There may well be valid reasons why some congregations are not growing, like the decline of 160-acre family farms in rural America. Growth is not the only measure of congregational health, as Peter Steinke writes knowledgably in A Door Set Open.1 That said, decline in any congregation and in the general synod saddens us and challenges us to strategic thinking for the future, espe- cially in our seminaries as we prepare the pastors who will take our places. When groups talk about our decline, the amazing growth of Christianity in other places, especially Africa, is usually brought up, but in my experience these discussions usually end in res- ignation and the meeting proceeds. The 800-pound gorilla of decline lumbers off to sit silently in the back of the room and watches us vainly put our energies into lubricating the machinery of an institutional church we love but is in serious decline. I certainly don’t have a silver-bullet answer, no one does, but we can gain insight by comparing today’s culture to the culture of the early and growing church, which is one reason why our healthy, confessional seminaries are especially important in this time of decline. Professors who are scholars in cultures and historical times different than our own can help us understand the practical problems facing the church today. “Most of what we do in serious Bible study has to do with overcoming the gaps that separate us from the original audience of the scriptural documents.”2 Learning the differences between the cultures of the first and the twenty-first century can sharpen pastoral presentation of God’s gospel to all the baptized in sermons, Bible classes, and conversation. And the more insightful and incisive we are in our preaching, teaching, and visitation, the more our laity will be enabled to give persuasive reasons for the hope that is in them as they pursue their vocations in the world (1 Pt 3:15).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Response to Bengt Hagglund: Ihe Importance of Epistemology for Luther's and Melanchthon's Theology
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 44, Numbers 2-3 -- JULY 1980 Can the Lutheran Confessions Have Any Meaning 450 Years Later?.................... Robert D. Preus 104 Augustana VII and the Eclipse of Ecumenism ....................................... Siegbert W. Becker 108 Melancht hon versus Luther: The Contemporary Struggle ......................... Bengt Hagglund 123 In Response to Bengt Hagglund: Ihe Importance of Epistemology for Luther's and Melanchthon's Theology .............. Wilbert H. Rosin 134 Did Luther and Melanchthon Agree on the Real Presence?.. .................................. David P. Scaer 14 1 Luther and Melanchthon in America.. .................. ..... .......................C. George Fry 148 Luther's Contribution to the Augsburg Confession .............................................. Eugene F. Klug 155 Fanaticism as a Theological Category in the Lutheran Confessions ............................... Paul L. Maier 173 Homiletical Studies 182 In Response to Bengt Hagglund: Luther and Melanchthon in America C. George Fry It has always struck me as strangely appropriate that the Protestant Reformation and the discovery of America occurred simultaneously. When Martin Luther was nine, Christopher Columbus landed in the Bahamas; in 15 19, while he debated Dr. John Eck at Leipzig, a fellow-subject of Emperor Charles V, Hernando Cortez, began the conquest of Mexico. Philip Melanc ht hon, the "Great Confessor," was com.posing the Augustana at about the time Francisco Pizarro was occupying the Inca Empire in Peru. By the time of Melancht hon's death in 1560, the Americas had been opened up to European settlement. A related theme of equal interest is that of the American dis- covery of the Reformation. Or, more properly, the recovery by Lutherans in the United States of the history and theology of the Reformers.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Views of Original Sin and Associated Arguments and Meanings
    CHAPTER TWO COMPETING VIEWS OF ORIGINAL SIN AND ASSOCIATED ARGUMENTS AND MEANINGS The dispute over the definition of original sin, or more precisely, Matthias Flacius Illyricus’s1 controversial explanation of this doctrine, originated at the University of Jena in 1560 among the highest levels of the Lutheran academic world. It did not enter the territory of Mansfeld until a decade later. There it first claimed the attention of those clerics who operated in intellectual circles that went beyond the territory’s borders. But divisions within this ecclesiastical leadership soon spread throughout the territory’s entire pastorate. It may seem strange to begin a discussion of lay religiosity with elite theologians debating abstract points of doctrine in ivory towers. But in order to understand why the laity of Mansfeld became deeply involved in the controversy, it is important to start at the beginning with the central intellectual premise, and work outward to the various meanings and connotations it came to encompass. Only then can the laity’s association with one side or the other begin to make sense. The assumption here is that a purely intellectual weighing of the validity of the two definitions of original sin was not the only aspect of the debate 1 Matthias Flacius Illyricus (1520–1575) was born in Croatia, but studied in Venice, Basel, and Tübingen, before matriculating in Wittenberg in 1541. He eventu- ally became a professor of Hebrew there, where he was influenced by both Luther and Melanchthon, the former particularly with regard to pastoral care, the latter with regard to theology. After Emperor Charles V’s defeat of the Lutheran princes in the Schmalkald War (1547), as Melanchthon was urging a conciliatory policy, Flacius took up the banner of complete resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanchthon Versus Luther: the Contemporary Struggle
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 44, Numbers 2-3 --- - - - JULY 1980 Can the Lutheran Confessions Have Any Meaning 450 Years Later?.................... Robert D. Preus 104 Augustana VII and the Eclipse of Ecumenism ....................................... Sieg bert W. Becker 108 Melancht hon versus Luther: The Contemporary Struggle ......................... Bengt Hagglund 123 In-. Response to Bengt Hagglund: The importance of Epistemology for Luther's and Melanchthon's Theology .............. Wilbert H. Rosin 134 Did Luther and Melanchthon Agree on the Real Presence?.. ....................................... David P. Scaer 14 1 Luther and Melanchthon in America ................................................ C. George Fry 148 Luther's Contribution to the Augsburg Confession .............................................. Eugene F. Klug 155 Fanaticism as a Theological Category in the Lutheran Confessions ............................... Paul L. Maier 173 Homiletical Studies 182 Melanchthon versus Luther: the Contemporary Struggle Bengt Hagglund Luther and Melanchthon in Modern Research In many churches in Scandinavia or in Germany one will find two oil paintings of the same size and datingfrom the same time, representing Martin Luther and Philip Melanchthon, the two prime reformers of the Church. From the point of view of modern research it may seem strange that Melanchthon is placed on the same level as Luther, side by side with him, equal in importance and equally worth remembering as he. Their common achieve- ment was, above all, the renewal of the preaching of the Gospel, and therefore it is deserving t hat their portraits often are placed in the neighborhood of the pulpit. Such pairs of pictures were typical of the nineteenth-century view of Melanchthon and Luther as harmonious co-workers in the Reformation. These pic- tures were widely displayed not only in the churches, but also in many private homes in areas where the Reformation tradition was strong.
    [Show full text]
  • [Formula of Concord]
    [Formula of Concord] Editors‘ Introduction to the Formula of Concord Every movement has a period in which its adherents attempt to sort out and organize the fundamental principles on which the founder or founders of the movement had based its new paradigm and proposal for public life. This was true of the Lutheran Reformation. In the late 1520s one of Luther‘s early students, John Agricola, challenged first the conception of God‘s law expressed by Luther‘s close associate and colleague, Philip Melanchthon, and, a decade later, Luther‘s own doctrine of the law. This began the disputes over the proper interpretation of Luther‘s doctrinal legacy. In the 1530s and 1540s Melanchthon and a former Wittenberg colleague, Nicholas von Amsdorf, privately disagreed on the role of good works in salvation, the bondage or freedom of the human will in relationship to God‘s grace, the relationship of the Lutheran reform to the papacy, its relationship to government, and the real presence of Christ‘s body and blood in the Lord‘s Supper. The contention between the two foreshadowed a series of disputes that divided the followers of Luther and Melanchthon in the period after Luther‘s death, in which political developments in the empire fashioned an arena for these disputes. In the months after Luther‘s death on 18 February 1546, Emperor Charles V finally was able to marshal forces to attempt the imposition of his will on his defiant Lutheran subjects and to execute the Edict of Worms of 1521, which had outlawed Luther and his followers.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Chemnitz on the Doctrine of Justification
    Martin Chemnitz on the Doctrine of Justification [Presented at the Reformation Lectures, Bethany Lutheran College and Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary, October 30, 1985, Lecture II] By Dr. Jacob A. 0. Preus 1. In 1537 at Wittenberg Luther presided over a Disputatio held in connection with the academic promotion of two candidates, Palladius and Tilemann, in which he discussed the passage in Rom. 3:28, “We believe that a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the law.” Luther, in his prefatory remarks, said, “The article of justification is the master and prince, the lord and ruler and judge of all areas of doctrine. It preserves and governs the entire teaching of the church and directs our conscience before God. Without this article the world is in total death and darkness, for there is no error so small, so insignificant and isolated that it does not completely please the mind of man and mislead us, if we are cut off from thinking and meditating on this article. Therefore, because the world is so obtuse and insensitive, it is necessary to deal with this doctrine constantly and have the greatest understanding of it. Especially if we wish to advise the churches, we will fear no evil, if we give the greatest labor and diligence in teaching particularly this article. For when the mind has been strengthened and confirmed in this sure knowledge, then it can stand firm in all things. Therefore, this is not some small or unimportant matter, particularly for those who wish to stand on the battle line and contend against the devil, sin, and death and teach the churches.” 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Porterfield Krauth: the American Chemnitz
    The 37th Annual Reformation Lectures Reformation Legacy on American Soil Bethany Lutheran College S. C. Ylvisaker Fine Arts Center Mankato, Minnesota October 28-29, 2004 Lecture Number Three: Charles Porterfield Krauth: The American Chemnitz The Rev. Prof. David Jay Webber Ternopil’, Ukraine Introduction C. F. W. Walther, the great nineteenth-century German-American churchman, has some- times been dubbed by his admirers “the American Luther.”1 While all comparisons of this nature have their limitations, there is a lot of truth in this appellation. Walther’s temperament, his lead- ership qualities, and especially his theological convictions would lend legitimacy to such a de- scription. Similarly, we would like to suggest that Charles Porterfield Krauth, in light of the unique gifts and abilities with which he was endowed, and in light of the thoroughness and balance of his mature theological work, can fittingly be styled “the American Chemnitz.” Krauth was in fact an avid student of the writings of the Second Martin, and he absorbed much from him in both form and substance. It is also quite apparent that the mature Krauth always attempted to follow a noticeably Chemnitzian, “Concordistic” approach in the fulfillment of his calling as a teacher of the church in nineteenth-century America. We will return to these thoughts in a little while. Be- fore that, though, we should spend some time in examining Krauth’s familial and ecclesiastical origins, and the historical context of his development as a confessor of God’s timeless truth. Krauth’s Origins In the words of Walther, Krauth was, without a doubt, the most eminent man in the English Lutheran Church of this country, a man of rare learning, at home no less in the old than in modern theology, and, what is of greatest import, whole-heartedly devoted to the pure doctrine of our Church, as he had learned to understand it, a noble man and without guile.2 But Krauth’s pathway to this kind of informed Confessionalism was not an easy one.
    [Show full text]
  • John Blahoslav, "Father and Charioteer of the Lord's People in the Unitas Fratrum"
    John Blahoslav, "Father and Charioteer of the Lord's People in the Unitas Fratrum" MILOS STRUPL Brief was the span of life which the Lord had allotted to Brother John Blahoslav. When he, "of the topmost four", one of the bishops of his communion, died on the twenty-fourth day of November 1571, while on a visit near Moravsky Krumlov, he had not yet reached his forty- ninth year. "All too soon, according to our judgment", sighed Lawrence Orlik, Blahoslav's faithful co-worker, as he was recording the death of his superior in the Necrology of the Unitas Fratrum, "it pleased the Lord to take him away; he himself knows for what reason. Mysterious divine judgments!" 1 And yet, its brevity notwithstanding, it had been a full life, crowded with the most diversified activities in the service of his beloved Unitas. For Blahoslav was indeed - quoting once more from Orlik's Necrology - "a great and outstanding man, whose fame, having been carried far and wide, excelled among other nations, a great and precious jewel of the Unitas".2 In this glowing appraisal Orlik did not remain alone. Others have voiced similar opinions. To mention just one, a modern historian, Vaclav Novotny, referred to Blahoslav as "one of the noblest spirits of his time, one of the most learned of his contemporaries, and therefore one of the most celebrated sons of his nation".3 No one will seriously question that in the history of the Unitas Fratrum Blahoslav holds a truly pivotal position. His importance must be judged in comparison with that of Brother Lucas of Prague, "the second founder of the Unitas", and that of John Amos Comenius, its last great spiritual leader and a man of undeniable international stature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formula of Concord As a Model for Discourse in the Church
    21st Conference of the International Lutheran Council Berlin, Germany August 27 – September 2, 2005 The Formula of Concord as a Model for Discourse in the Church Robert Kolb The appellation „Formula of Concord“ has designated the last of the symbolic or confessional writings of the Lutheran church almost from the time of its composition. This document was indeed a formulation aimed at bringing harmony to strife-ridden churches in the search for a proper expression of the faith that Luther had proclaimed and his colleagues and followers had confessed as a liberating message for both church and society fifty years earlier. This document is a formula, a written document that gives not even the slightest hint that it should be conveyed to human ears instead of human eyes. The Augsburg Confession had been written to be read: to the emperor, to the estates of the German nation, to the waiting crowds outside the hall of the diet in Augsburg. The Apology of the Augsburg Confession, it is quite clear from recent research,1 followed the oral form of judicial argument as Melanchthon presented his case for the Lutheran confession to a mythically yet neutral emperor; the Apology was created at the yet not carefully defined border between oral and written cultures. The Large Catechism reads like the sermons from which it was composed, and the Small Catechism reminds every reader that it was written to be recited and repeated aloud. The Formula of Concord as a „Binding Summary“ of Christian Teaching In contrast, the „Formula of Concord“ is written for readers, a carefully- crafted formulation for the theologians and educated lay people of German Lutheran churches to ponder and study.
    [Show full text]
  • Lutheran Confessions Bible Study
    A Brief Introduction to the Lutheran Confessions A Bible Study Course for Adults by Robert J. Koester Student Lessons • Lesson One—The Three Ecumenical Creeds: “The Ancient Church’s Confession” • Lesson Two—The Small and Large Catechisms: “The People’s Confession” • Lesson Three—The Augsburg Confession and the Apology: “The Princes’ Confession” • Lesson Four—The Smalcald Articles: “Luther’s Confession” • Lesson Five—The Formula of Concord, Part One: “The Theologians’ Confession” Scripture is taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. All quotations from the confessions, where noted as Kolb and Wengert, are from The Book of Concord edited by Robert Kolb and Timothy Wengert, © 2000 Fortress Press, Minneapolis, MN. Used by permission of Augsburg Fortress Publishers. All rights reserved. Northwestern Publishing House 1250 N. 113th St., Milwaukee, WI 53226-3284 www.nph.net © 2009 by Northwestern Publishing House Published 2009 Lesson One The Three Ecumenical Creeds: “The Ancient Church’s Confession” Introduction: What Are the Lutheran Confessions? Anyone who has attended the installation of a pastor or teacher in a confessional Lutheran church has heard the officiant ask the person being installed several questions. Among them are “Do you confess the Holy Scriptures to be the inspired Word of God?” and “Do you hold to the confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran church and believe they are a correct exposition of Scripture?” Then the officiant reads off the list of the Lutheran Confessions. Unless you have received the formal training of a pastor or teacher, you may be left scratching your head.
    [Show full text]
  • HHJ Bl Liicmnnniu) a SALUTARY INFLUENCE
    HHJ Bl liicmnnniu) A SALUTARY INFLUENCE: GETTYSBURG COLLEGE, 1832-1985 Volume 1 Charles H. Glatfelter Gettysburg College Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 1987 Copyright © 1987 by Gettysburg College Allrights reserved. No part of this book may be used or repro- duced in any manner without written permission except in the case of brief quotations incritical articles or reviews. Printed inthe United States of America byW &MPrinting,Inc. Design and typography by C & J Enterprises, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania The College Seal, 1832-1921 From an 1850 deed Contents Illustrations and Maps viii Tables ix Preface xi 1. The Background of Gettysburg College (1776-1832) 3 July 4, 1832 3 Two Colleges for Southcentral Pennsylvania 6 Lutheran Ministerial Training 13 Samuel Simon Schmucker 16 Gettysburg and the Lutheran Theological Seminary 22 Classical School and Gymnasium (1827-1832) 26 Pennsylvania College of Gettysburg (1831-1832) 32 2. Acquiring a Proper College Edifice (1832-1837) 41 Getting the Money 41 Building 58 3. After the Manner of a Well-Regulated Family (1832 1868) 73 Trustees 75 Finances 81 Presidents and Faculty 92 The Campus 104 Preparatory Department 119 Curriculum 122 Library 135 Equipment 139 The Medical Department 141 Students 146 Student Organizations 159 Alumni Association 167 Town and Gown 169 The College and the Lutheran Church 173 In the World of Higher Education 180 The Civil War 191 Changing the Guard 190 4. A Wider Place for a Greater Work (1868-1904) 193 Trustees 195 Finances 207 Presidents and Faculty 222 The Campus 242 Preparatory
    [Show full text]
  • \200\200The American Recension of the Augsburg Confession
    The American Recension of the Augsburg Confession and its Lessons for Our Pastors Today David Jay Webber Samuel Simon Schmucker Charles Philip Krauth John Bachman William Julius Mann Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod Evangelical Lutheran Synod Arizona-California District Pastors Conference West Coast Pastors Conference October 20-22, 2015 April 13 & 15, 2016 Green Valley Lutheran Church Our Redeemer Lutheran Church Henderson, Nevada Yelm, Washington In Nomine Iesu I. Those creeds and confessions of the Christian church that are of enduring value and authority emerged in crucibles of controversy, when essential points of the Christian faith, as revealed in Scripture, were under serious attack. These symbolical documents were written at times when the need for a faithful confession of the gospel was a matter of spiritual life or death for the church and its members. For this reason those symbolical documents were thereafter used by the orthodox church as a normed norm for instructing laymen and future ministers, and for testing the doctrinal soundness of the clergy, with respect to the points of Biblical doctrine that they address. The ancient Rules of Faith of the post-apostolic church, which were used chiefly for catechetical instruction and as a baptismal creed, existed in various regional versions. The version used originally at Rome is the one that has come down to us as the Apostles’ Creed. These Rules of Faith were prepared specifically with the challenge of Gnosticism in view. As the Apostles’ Creed in particular summarizes the cardinal articles of faith regarding God and Christ, it emphasizes the truth that the only God who actually exists is the God who created the earth as well as the heavens; and the truth that God’s Son was truly conceived and born as a man, truly died, and truly rose from the grave.
    [Show full text]
  • Zion Trumpet Address Service Requested Zion Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Detroit April/May 2020
    Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church Non-Profit Org. “Blow the Trumpet in Zion” (Joel 2.15) 4305 Military U.S. Postage Detroit MI 48210-3415 PAID Permit No. 1489 Zion Trumpet Address Service Requested Zion Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Detroit April/May 2020 by Father Braden “...He was wounded Holy Week - As this issue of the Trumpet is published, by for our God’s grace we find ourselves in Holy Week. Passiontide, that transgressions, deep violet two-week period, that time when the glory of the Lord is veiled among us, began with the prayer “Judge me, O God, and He was bruised for plead my cause…” That prayer for the vindication of the righteous our iniquities; is answered as the Christ enters Jerusalem, and as palm branches The chastisement and joyous shouts give way to cries of “Crucify! Crucify!” and to scourge and cross. for our peace was In love, your Lord instituted the Supper in which He comes to you. upon Him, He willingly went forth to His arrest. He endured the agony of His And by His stripes garden prayers. He knew the three horrible hours in the darkness we are healed.” of Golgotha. He heard the taunts as His life was drained from Isaiah 53:5 Him, as the Words of the 22nd Psalm found their fulfilment. And He lay silent on the Passover Sabbath, perfectly keeping the Sabbath for all men of all times. In This Issue Holy Week P A G E 1 The account of our Lord’s Passion, suffering and death that Holy Vicarage Update P A G E 2 Scripture records is accurate.
    [Show full text]