DOCSLIB.ORG

Nomenclature of the Acanthocephala

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nomenclature of the Acanthocephala Research and Reviews in Parasitology, 54 (3): 135-205 (1994) Published by A.P.E. © 1994 Asociaci6n de Parasit61ogos Espafioles (A.P.E) Printed in Barcelona, Spain NOMENCLATURE OFTHE ACANTHOCEPHALA Y.J. GOLVAN Parasitologie, Pathologie et Epidemiologic Parasitaires, U.R.A. 1344 du C.N.R.S., Faculte de Medecine Saint Antolne, rue Chaligny 27, 75571 Paris Cedex 12, France Received 7 April 1993; accepted 20 April 1994 REFERENCE:GOLVAN(Y.1.), 1994.- Nomenclature of the Acanthocephala. Research and Reviews in Parasitology, 54 (3): 135-205. SUMMARYTh: e whole Phylum Acanthocephala is reviewed from the point of view of the nomenclature. All the genera and species described so far are alphabetically listed and their validity established and/or discussed. Synonyms and geographical distribution are noted for each species. All the references concerning these genera and species are included. The following new taxa are proposed: Arhythmorhynchus turbidus (Van Cleave, 1937) novocomb. (=Corynosoma turbidum Van Cleave, 1937); Arhythmorhynchus villoti nom. novo(=Echinorhynchus longicollis Villot, 1875); Cen- trorhynchus hartwichi nom. nov. (=Centrorhynchus conspectus sensu Hartwich, 1956); Centrorhynchus latai nom. novo[=Centrorhynchus indicus (Gupta et Lata, 1966) Gupta et Fatma, 1983]; Cleaveius inglisi (Gupta et Fatma, 1987) novocomb. (=Mehrarhynchus inglisi Gupta et Fatma, 1987); Cleaveius singhai (Gupta et Fatma, 1987) novocomb. (=Mehrarhynchus singhai Gupta et Fatma, 1987); Echinorhynchus (Metechinorhynchus) muraenolepisi (Rodyuk, 1984) novocomb. t=Metechinorhynchus muraenolepisi Rodyuk, 1984); Neoechinorhynchus dauai nom. novo(=Neoechi- norhynchus rutili sensu Datta, 1936 nec O.F. MUller, 1780); Neoechinorhynchus edmondsi nom. novo(=Neoechinorhynchus rutili sensu Edmonds, 1982); Neoechinorhynchus hartwichi nom. novo (=Neoechinorhynchus australis sensu Hartwich, 1956); Nephridiacanthus thapari (Sen et Chauhan, 1972) novocomb. (=Nephridiorhynchus thapari Sen et Chauhan, 1972); Plagiorhynchus pupa (von Linstow, 1905) novocomb. (=Echi- norhynchus pupa von Linstow, 1905); Porrorchis brevicanthus (Das, 1949) nov. comb. [=Centrorhynchus brevicanthus Das, (1949) 1950]; Profili- collis chasmagnathi (Holcman-Spector, Mane-Garzon et Dei-Cas, 1977) novocomb. [=Falsifilicollis chasmagnathi Holcman-Spector, Mane-Gar- zon et Dei-Cas, 1977; =Polymorphus (Profilicollis) chasmagnathi (Holcman-Spector, Mane-Garzon et Dei-Cas, 1977) Amin, 1985]; Prosthorhynchus asturi (Gupta et Lata, 1967) novocomb. (=Rhadinorhynchus asturi Gupta et Lata, 1967); Prosthorhynchus bullocki (Schmidt et Kuntz, 1966) novocomb. (=Plagiorhynchus bullocki Schmidt et Kuntz, 1966); Prosthorhynchus golvani (Schmidt et Kuntz, 1966) novocomb. i=Plagiorhynchus golvani Schmidt et Kuntz, 1966); Prosthorhynchus ogatai (Fukui et Morisita, 1936) nov. comb. [=Porrorchis ogatai Fukui et Morisita, 1936; =Plagiorhynchus (Prosthorhynchus) ogatai (Fukui et Morisita, 1936) Schmidt et Kuntz, 1966]; Prosthorhynchus russelli (Tadros, 1970) novocomb. (=Plagiorhynchus russelli Tadros, 1970); Prosthorhynchus schmidti nom. novo(=Prosthorhynchus rectus Sprehn, 1942 nee Lin- ton, 1892); Prosthorhynchus taiwanensis (Schmidt et Kuntz, 1966) novocomb. (=Plagiorhynchus taiwanensis Schmidt et Kuntz, 1966); Southwelli- na ardeae (Belopolskaja, 1958) novocomb. i=Polymorphus ardeae Belopolskaja, 1958); Southwellina pontica (Petrotschenko et Smogorjevskaja, 1962) nov. comb. (=Hemiechinosoma ponticum Petrotschenko et Smogorjevskaja, 1962); Sphaerirostris dollfusi nom. nov. (=Centrorhynchus picae sensu Dollfus, 1953); Sphaerirostris globuli (Nama et Rathore, 1984) nov comb. (=Centrorhynchus globuli Nama et Rathore, 1984); Sphaeri- rostris lesiniformis novocomb. [=Centrorhynchus lesiniformis (Molin, 1859) Meyer, 1932 (nec Bock, 1935)]; Sphaerirostris robustus (Datta, 1928) novocomb. (=Echinorhynchus robustus Datta, 1928); Sphaerirostris saxicoloides (Nama et Rathore, 1984) novocomb. (=Centrorhynchus saxicoloi- des Nama et Rathore, 1984); Sphaerirostris splendi (Gupta et Gupta, 1971) nov. comb. (=Centrorhynchus splendi Gupta et Gupta, 1971). KEy WORDS:Acanthocephala, nomenclature, genera, species, synonyms, geographical distribution, review. V.I. PETROTSCHENKO (1956 and 1958), Satyu YAMAGU- Nomina enim si pereunt, perit et rerum cognitio (Systema TI (1961), and more recently, Omar AMIN (1985), who Naturae, Xth edition). Filum ariadneum est Systema, sine quo Chaos est Historia presented a new classification of the Acanthocephala in naturalis (Philos. Botan.). the Biology of the Acanthocephala, which also contains a Carl von LINNE comprehensive index to information about the species mentioned in the book. I began to study the Acanthocephala in 1954. During INTRODUCTION the past 40 years, my only ambition was to make my own contribution to a very collective work. In this body The Linnean nomenclature of the Acanthocephala is of information and in the many taxonomic papers in more than 200 years old, So it should be no wonder that which the species have been described, many errors of many mistakes have been made during all these years. nomenclature were undoubtedly made. The present work Systematics is a very difficult science but it remains the is an attempt to correct errors for the benefit of Helmin- base for biological progress. In the field of the modern thology in the future. classification of the acanthocephalan worms, after the great precursors, such as Max LUHE (1911) and Anton MEYER (1932/1933), the status of a separate Phylum was GENERA AND SPECIES clearly established by the works of Harley J. VAN CLEA- VE (1948), who did much to promote the system of clas- In the following, the whole Phylum Acanthocephala is sification which is used today by the zoologists who reviewed from the point of view of the nomenclature. All study these parasites. the genera and species described so far are alphabetically After V AN CLEAVE, the work was carried on by many listed and their validity established and/or discussed. helminthologists. Especially noteworthy are the works of Synonyms and geographical distribution are noted for 136 Y.J.GOLVAN each species. Those considered valid taxa are noted in -A. aeutulus Van Cleave, 1931 (North Carolina, USA) bold. All the references concerning these genera and spe- -A. (Termitorhynehus) aenigma Reichensperger, 1922: cies are included at the end. may be an Oligaeanthorhynehus sensu lato (fide This list takes into account the decision of the Interna- MEYER, 1932) tional Commission for Zoological Nomenclature (Lon- -A. alabamensis Amin et Williams, 1983: syn. of Aean- don, 1962) that the name of a genus which ends with thoeephalus etowani Williams, 1974 «rhynchus» is masculine and so the specific name which -A. amurensis Kostylew, 1941: syn. of Paraeantho- follows must also be masculine. eephalus eurtus (A. et D.-A.) Yamaguti, 1963 (nee amuriensis) ACANTHOCEPHALOIDES Meyer, 1932 -A. anguillae (O.F. Muller, 1780) Liihe, 1911 (type spe- -A. ehabanaudi Dollfus, 1951 (nee ehabaunadi, nee cies) (all Europe) ehabaudi): syn. of Paraeanthoeephaloides ehabanau- -A. anguillae Belous, 1952: syn. of Paraeanthoeephalus di (D.) Golvan, 1969 eurtus Achmerov et Dombrowskaja-Achmerova, 1941 -A. claviformis Araki et Machida, 1987 (Japan) -A. anthuris (Dujardin, 1845) Luhe, 1911 (West Euro- -A. eyrusi Bray, Spencer Jones et Lewis, 1988 (St. Lucia pe) Lake, Natal) -A. artatus Van Cleave, 1925 (nee aratus) [prov. of Shi- -A. distinetus Golvan, 1969 (Senegal) nano, Japan, also found in India (doubtful)]: may be a -A. genetieus de Buron, Renaud et Euzet, 1986 (Medite- syn. of Aeanthoeephalus lucidus (fide HARADA,1935) rranean sea-shore of France) -A. balkanieus Batcharov et Combes, 1974 (Bulgaria) -A. iehiharai Araki et Machida, 1987 (North of Japan) -A. bigueti Houin, Golvan et Brygoo, 1965: syn. of -A. inerassatus (Molin, 1858) Meyer, 1932 (Adriatic Pseudoaeanthoeephalus bigueti (H., G. et B.) Golvan, and Black Sea) 1969 -A.japonieus (Fukui et Morisita, 1936) Yamaguti, 1939: -A. breviprostatus Kennedy, 1982 (East Asia) syn. of Aeanthoeephalus japonieus (F. et M.) Petrots- -A. bufonieola Kostylew, 1941: syn. of Pseudoaeantho- chenko, 1956 eephalus bufonieola (K.) Petrotschenko, 1956 -A. kostylewi Meyer, 1932 (Black Sea) -A. bufonis (Shipley, 1903) Southwell et Macfie, 1925: -A. neobythitis Yamaguti, 1939: syn. of Yamagutisentis syn. of Pseudoaeanthoeephalus bufonis (S.)Petrots- neobythitis (Y.) Golvan, 1969 chenko, 1956 -A. propinquus (Dujardin, 1845) Meyer, 1933 (type -A. bufonis sensu Southwell et Macfie, 1925 is another species) (Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea) (nee species (vide KENNEDY,1982) propinguus) -A. bufonis sensu Petrotschenko, 1953: syn. of Aeantho- -A. propinquus sensu Golvan, 1956: syn. of Aeantho- eephalus breviprostatus Kennedy, 1982 eephaloides distinetus Golvan, 1969 -A. caucasicus Petrotschenko, 1953: syn. of Pseudoa- -A. rhinoplagusiae Yamaguti, 1935: syn. of Yamaguti- eanthoeephalus eaueasieus (P.) Petrotschenko, 1956 sentis rhinoplagusiae (Y.) Golvan, 1969 (nee rhyno- -A. clavula (Dujardin, 1845) Grabda-Kazubska et plagusiae) Chubb, 1968 (nee Hamann, 1892) (all the south wes- -A. soleae (Porta, 1905) Meyer, 1932 in Petrotschenko, tern Europe) 1956: syn. of Solearhynehus soleae (P.) de Buron et -A. eorrealimai Machado Filho, 1970 (Parana, Brazil) Maillard, 1985 -A. eriniae Snow, 1970 (Australia) -A. eurtus (Achmerov et Dombrowskaja-Achmerova, ACANTHOCEPHALORHYNCHOIDES Kostylew, 1941) Yamaguti, 1963 (eastern Siberia) 1941: may be a syn. of Pallisentis Van Cleave, 1928 -A. dirus (Van Cleave,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (FNP) Bonny Island, Rivers State, Nigeria
    Biodiversity Assessment of Finima Nature Park (FNP) Bonny Island, Rivers State, Nigeria October, 2019 Finima Nature Park Biodiversity Assessment 2019 Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Wildlife and Mammals ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.0 Methods Employed in this FNP Mammal Study ..................................................................................................... 8 3.0 Results and Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Highlights of the Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 17 4.0 Towards Remediation of the Problems that Mammals and other Wildlife now Face or May Face in the Future, in the FNP and Environs ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Neopolystoma Price, 1939 (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the Description of Three New Species Louis H
    Du Preez et al. Parasites & Vectors (2017) 10:53 DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-1986-y RESEARCH Open Access Tracking platyhelminth parasite diversity from freshwater turtles in French Guiana: First report of Neopolystoma Price, 1939 (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species Louis H. Du Preez1,2*, Mathieu Badets1, Laurent Héritier1,3,4 and Olivier Verneau1,3,4 Abstract Background: Polystomatid flatworms in chelonians are divided into three genera, i.e. Polystomoides Ward, 1917, Polystomoidella Price, 1939 and Neopolystoma Price, 1939, according to the number of haptoral hooks. Among the about 55 polystome species that are known to date from the 327 modern living chelonians, only four species of Polystomoides are currently recognised within the 45 South American freshwater turtles. Methods: During 2012, several sites in the vicinity of the cities Cayenne and Kaw in French Guiana were investigated for freshwater turtles. Turtles were collected at six sites and the presence of polystomatid flatworms was assessed from the presence of polystome eggs released by infected specimens. Results: Among the three turtle species that were collected, no polystomes were found in the gibba turtle Mesoclemmys gibba (Schweigger, 1812). The spot-legged turtle Rhinoclemmys punctularia (Daudin, 1801) was infected with two species of Neopolystoma Price, 1939, one in the conjunctival sacs and the other in the urinary bladder, while the scorpion mud turtle Kinosternon scorpioides (Linnaeus, 1766) was found to be infected with a single Neopolystoma species in the conjunctival sacs. These parasites could be distinguished from known species of Neopolystoma by a combination of morphological characteristics including body size, number and length of genital spines, shape and size of the testis.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa 20Th Anniversary Celebration: Section Acanthocephala
    Zootaxa 4979 (1): 031–037 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Editorial ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4979.1.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:047940CE-817A-4AE3-8E28-4FB03EBC8DEA Zootaxa 20th Anniversary Celebration: section Acanthocephala SCOTT MONKS Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Apartado Postal 1-10, C.P. 42001, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México and Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0514, USA [email protected]; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5041-8582 Abstract Of 32 papers including Acanthocephala that were published in Zootaxa from 2001 to 2020, 5, by 11 authors from 5 countries, described 5 new species and redescribed 1 known species and 27 checklists from 11 countries and/geographical regions by 72 authors. A bibliographic analysis of these papers, the number of species reported in the checklists, and a list of new species are presented in this paper. Key words: Acanthocephala, new species, checklist, bibliography The Phylum Acanthocephala is a relatively small group of endoparasitic helminths (helminths = worm-like animals that are parasites; not a monophyletic group). Adults use vertebrates as definitive hosts (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals), eggs are passed in the feces and infect arthropods (insects and crustacean) as intermediate hosts, where the cystacanth develops, and the cystacanth infects the definitive host when it is ingested. In some cases, fishes, reptiles, and amphibians that eat arthropods serve as paratenic (transport) hosts to bridge ecological barriers to adults of a species that typically does not feed on arthropods.
    [Show full text]
  • Helminths of the Common Opossum Didelphis Marsupialis
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 88 (2017) 560–571 www.ib.unam.mx/revista/ Taxonomy and systematics Helminths of the common opossum Didelphis marsupialis (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae), with a checklist of helminths parasitizing marsupials from Peru Helmintos de la zarigüeya común Didelphis marsupialis (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae), con una lista de los helmintos de marsupiales de Perú a,∗ a b c a Jhon D. Chero , Gloria Sáez , Carlos Mendoza-Vidaurre , José Iannacone , Celso L. Cruces a Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemática, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Jr. Río Chepén 290, El Agustino, 15007 Lima, Peru b Universidad Alas Peruanas, Jr. Martínez Copagnon Núm. 1056, 22202 Tarapoto, San Martín, Peru c Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Santiago de Surco, 15039 Lima, Peru Received 9 June 2016; accepted 27 March 2017 Available online 19 August 2017 Abstract Between May and November 2015, 8 specimens of Didelphis marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758 (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae) collected in San Martín, Peru were examined for the presence of helminths. A total of 582 helminths representing 11 taxa were identified (2 digeneans and 9 nematodes). Five new host records and 4 species of nematodes [Gongylonemoides marsupialis (Vaz & Pereira, 1934) Freitas & Lent, 1937, Trichuris didelphis Babero, 1960, Viannaia hamata Travassos, 1914 and Viannaia viannaia Travassos, 1914] are added to the composition of the helminth fauna of the marsupials in this country. Further, a checklist of all available published accounts of helminth parasites reported from Peru is provided. To date, a total of 38 helminth parasites have been recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasite Kit Description List (PDF)
    PARASITE KIT DESCRIPTION PARASITES 1. Acanthamoeba 39. Diphyllobothrium 77. Isospora 115. Pneumocystis 2. Acanthocephala 40. Dipylidium 78. Isthmiophora 116. Procerovum 3. Acanthoparyphium 41. Dirofilaria 79. Leishmania 117. Prosthodendrium 4. Amoeba 42. Dracunculus 80. Linguatula 118. Pseudoterranova 5. Ancylostoma 43. Echinochasmus 81. Loa Loa 119. Pygidiopsis 6. Angiostrongylus 44. Echinococcus 82. Mansonella 120. Raillietina 7. Anisakis 45. Echinoparyphium 83. Mesocestoides 121. Retortamonas 8. Armillifer 46. Echinostoma 84. Metagonimus 122. Sappinia 9. Artyfechinostomum 47. Eimeria 85. Metastrongylus 123. Sarcocystis 10. Ascaris 48. Encephalitozoon 86. Microphallus 124. Schistosoma 11. Babesia 49. Endolimax 87. Microsporidia 1 125. Spirometra 12. Balamuthia 50. Entamoeba 88. Microsporidia 2 126. Stellantchasmus 13. Balantidium 51. Enterobius 89. Multiceps 127. Stephanurus 14. Baylisascaris 52. Enteromonas 90. Naegleria 128. Stictodora 15. Bertiella 53. Episthmium 91. Nanophyetus 129. Strongyloides 16. Besnoitia 54. Euparyphium 92. Necator 130. Syngamus 17. Blastocystis 55. Eustrongylides 93. Neodiplostomum 131. Taenia 18. Brugia.M 56. Fasciola 94. Neoparamoeba 132. Ternidens 19. Brugia.T 57. Fascioloides 95. Neospora 133. Theileria 20. Capillaria 58. Fasciolopsis 96. Nosema 134. Thelazia 21. Centrocestus 59. Fischoederius 97. Oesophagostmum 135. Toxocara 22. Chilomastix 60. Gastrodiscoides 98. Onchocerca 136. Toxoplasma 23. Clinostomum 61. Gastrothylax 99. Opisthorchis 137. Trachipleistophora 24. Clonorchis 62. Giardia 100. Orientobilharzia 138. Trichinella 25. Cochliopodium 63. Gnathostoma 101. Paragonimus 139. Trichobilharzia 26. Contracaecum 64. Gongylonema 102. Passalurus 140. Trichomonas 27. Cotylurus 65. Gryodactylus 103. Pentatrichormonas 141. Trichostrongylus 28. Cryptosporidium 66. Gymnophalloides 104. Pfiesteria 142. Trichuris 29. Cutaneous l.migrans 67. Haemochus 105. Phagicola 143. Tritrichomonas 30. Cyclocoelinae 68. Haemoproteus 106. Phaneropsolus 144. Trypanosoma 31. Cyclospora 69. Hammondia 107. Phocanema 145. Uncinaria 32.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoechinorhynchus Pimelodi Sp.N. (Eoacanthocephala
    NEOECHINORHYNCHUS PIMELODI SP.N. (EOACANTHOCEPHALA, NEOECHINORHYNCHIDAE) PARASITIZING PIMELODUS MACULATUS LACÉPEDE, "MANDI-AMARELO" (SILUROIDEI, PIMELODIDAE) FROM THE BASIN OF THE SÃO FRANCISCO RIVER, TRÊS MARIAS, MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL Marilia de Carvalho Brasil-Sato 1 Gilberto Cezar Pavanelli 2 ABSTRACT. Neoechillorhynchus pimelodi sp.n. is described as the first record of Acanthocephala in Pimelodlls macula/lIs Lacépéde, 1803, collected in the São Fran­ cisco ri ver, Três Marias, Minas Gerais. The new spec ies is distinguished from other of the genus by lhe lhree circles of hooks of different sizes, and by lhe eggs measurements. The hooks measuring 100- 112 (105), 32-40 (36) and 20-27 (23) in length in lhe males and 102-1 42 (129), 34-55 (47) and 27-35 (29) in lenglh in lhe fema les for the anterior, middle and posterior circles. The eggs measuring 15-22 (18) in length and 12- 15 ( 14) in width, with concentric layers oftexture smooth, enveloping lhe acanthor. KEY WORDS. Acanlhocephala, Neoechinorhynchidae, Neoechino/'hynchus p imelodi sp.n., Pimelodlls macula/lIs, São Francisco ri ver, Brazil Among the Acanthocephala species listed in the genus Neoechinorhynchus Hamann, 1892 by GOLVAN (1994), the 1'ollowing parasitize 1'reshwater fishes in Brazil : Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae Go lvan, 1956, N. paraguayensis Machado Filho, 1959, N. pterodoridis Thatcher, 1981 and N. golvani Salgado-Maldonado, 1978, in the Amazon Region, N. curemai Noronha, 1973, in the states of Pará, Amazonas and Rio de Janeiro, and N. macronucleatus Machado Filho, 1954, in the state 01' Espirito Santo. ln the present report Neoechinorhynchus pimelodi sp.n. infectingPimelodus maculatus Lacépede, 1803 (Siluroidei, Pimelodidae), collected in the São Francisco River, Três Marias, Minas Gerais, Brazil is described.
    [Show full text]
  • Esox Lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Ryan Hagerty/USFWS. Public Domain – Government Work. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/26990/rec/22. (February 1, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Circumpolar in fresh water. North America: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from Labrador to Alaska and south to Pennsylvania and Nebraska, USA [Page and Burr 2011]. Eurasia: Caspian, Black, Baltic, White, Barents, Arctic, North and Aral Seas and Atlantic basins, southwest to Adour drainage; Mediterranean basin in Rhône drainage and northern Italy. Widely distributed in central Asia and Siberia easward [sic] to Anadyr drainage (Bering Sea basin). Historically absent from Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean France, central Italy, southern and western Greece, eastern Adriatic basin, Iceland, western Norway and northern Scotland.” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Esox lucius as native in Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Monaco, 1 Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States (including Alaska). From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Occurs in Erqishi river and Ulungur lake [in China].” “Known from the Selenge drainage [in Mongolia] [Kottelat 2006].” “[In Turkey:] Known from the European Black Sea watersheds, Anatolian Black Sea watersheds, Central and Western Anatolian lake watersheds, and Gulf watersheds (Firat Nehri, Dicle Nehri).
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Culture of Neoechinorhynchus Buttnerae
    Original Article ISSN 1984-2961 (Electronic) www.cbpv.org.br/rbpv Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol., Jaboticabal, v. 27, n. 4, p. 562-569, oct.-dec. 2018 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-296120180079 In vitro culture of Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae): Influence of temperature and culture media Cultivo in vitro de Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae): influência da temperatura e dos meios de cultura Carinne Moreira de Souza Costa1; Talissa Beatriz Costa Lima1; Matheus Gomes da Cruz1; Daniela Volcan Almeida1; Maurício Laterça Martins2; Gabriela Tomas Jerônimo2* 1 Programa de Pós-graduação em Aquicultura, Universidade Nilton Lins, Manaus, AM, Brasil 2 Laboratório Sanidade de Organismos Aquáticos – AQUOS, Departamento de Aquicultura, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil Received August 9, 2018 Accepted September 10, 2018 Abstract Infection by the acantocephalan Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae is considered one of most important concerns for tambaqui fish (Colossoma macropomum) production. Treatment strategies have been the focus of several in vivo studies; however, few studies have been undertaken on in vitro protocols for parasite maintenance. The aim of the present study was to develop the best in vitro culture condition for N. buttnerae to ensure its survival and adaptation out of the host to allow for the testing of substances to be used to control the parasite. To achieve this, parasites were collected from naturally infected fish and distributed in 6-well culture plates under the following treatments in triplicate: 0.9% NaCl, sterile tank water, L-15 Leibovitz culture medium, L-15 Leibovitz + agar 2% culture medium, RPMI 1640 culture medium, and RPMI 1640 + agar 2% culture medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Systematics and Life History of Polymorphous Altmani (Perry)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1967 Studies on the Systematics and Life History of Polymorphous Altmani (Perry). John Edward Karl Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Karl, John Edward Jr, "Studies on the Systematics and Life History of Polymorphous Altmani (Perry)." (1967). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1341. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1341 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67-17,324 KARL, Jr., John Edward, 1928- STUDIES ON THE SYSTEMATICS AND LIFE HISTORY OF POLYMORPHUS ALTMANI (PERRY). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1967 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © John Edward Karl, Jr. 1 9 6 8 All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. -STUDIES o n t h e systematics a n d LIFE HISTORY OF POLYMQRPHUS ALTMANI (PERRY) A Dissertation 'Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Zoology and Physiology by John Edward Karl, Jr, Mo S«t University of Kentucky, 1953 August, 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Eriyusni Upload
    Aceh Journal of Animal Science (2019) 4(2): 61-69 DOI: 10.13170/ajas.4.2.14129 Printed ISSN 2502-9568 Electronic ISSN 2622-8734 SHORT COMMUNICATION Endoparasite worms infestation on Skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis from Sibolga waters, Indonesia Eri Yusni*, Raihan Uliya Faculty of Agriculture, University of North Sumatera, Medan, Indonesia. *Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] Received: 24 July 2019 Accepted: 11 August 2019 ABSTRACT Skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis is one of the commercial species of fishes in Indonesia frequently caught by fishermen in Sibolga waters, North Sumatra Province. There is, however, presently no study conducted on the endoparasites infestation in these fishes. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to identify endoparasitic worms and examine the intensity level in skipjack tuna K. pelamis from Sibolga waters. Sampling was conducted in Debora Private Fishing Port, Sibolga from 4th to 18th June 2019 and a total of 20 fish samples with weight ranged between 740 g and 1.200 g and length from 37.2 cm to 41.4 cm were analyzed in the study. The identification of the worm was conducted in the laboratory using a stereo microscope. The results showed seven species or genera of worms were found in the intestine and stomach of the fish with varying level of intensity and incidence. For example, Echinorhynchus sp. was found with 100% intestinal and 10% stomach incidences at a total intensity of 8.5; Acanthocephalus sp. with 25% intestinal incidence and 1.6 intensity, Rhadinorhynchus sp. with 25% intestinal and 5% stomach incidences, and 1.5 intensity; Leptorhynchoides sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Parasitology
    January 2000 Number 1 Comparative Parasitology Formerly the Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington A semiannual journal of research devoted to Helminthology and all branches of Parasitology BROOKS, D. R., AND"£. P. HOBERG. Triage for the Biosphere: Hie Need and Rationale for Taxonomic Inventories and Phylogenetic Studies of Parasites/ MARCOGLIESE, D. J., J. RODRIGUE, M. OUELLET, AND L. CHAMPOUX. Natural Occurrence of Diplostomum sp. (Digenea: Diplostomatidae) in Adult Mudpiippies- and Bullfrog Tadpoles from the St. Lawrence River, Quebec __ COADY, N. R., AND B. B. NICKOL. Assessment of Parenteral P/agior/iync^us cylindraceus •> (Acatithocephala) Infections in Shrews „ . ___. 32 AMIN, O. M., R. A. HECKMANN, V H. NGUYEN, V L. PHAM, AND N. D. PHAM. Revision of the Genus Pallisedtis (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae) with the Erection of Three New Subgenera, the Description of Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) ^vietnamensis subgen. et sp. n., a Key to Species of Pallisentis, and the Description of ,a'New QuadrigyridGenus,Pararaosentis gen. n. , ..... , '. _. ... ,- 40- SMALES, L. R.^ Two New Species of Popovastrongylns Mawson, 1977 (Nematoda: Gloacinidae) from Macropodid Marsupials in Australia ."_ ^.1 . 51 BURSEY, C.,R., AND S. R. GOLDBERG. Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n. (Nematoda: Angiostomatidae) and'Other Intestinal Hehninths of the Japanese Clawed Salamander,^ Onychodactylns japonicus (Caudata: Hynobiidae), from Japan „„ „..„. 60 DURETTE-DESSET, M-CL., AND A. SANTOS HI. Carolinensis tuffi sp. n. (Nematoda: Tricho- strongyUna: Heligmosomoidea) from the White-Ankled Mouse, Peromyscuspectaralis Osgood (Rodentia:1 Cricetidae) from Texas, U.S.A. 66 AMIN, O. M., W. S. EIDELMAN, W. DOMKE, J. BAILEY, AND G. PFEIFER. An Unusual ^ Case of Anisakiasis in California, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 in Biology of the Acanthocephala]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 1985 Epizootiology: [Chapter 9 in Biology of the Acanthocephala] Brent B. Nickol University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Parasitology Commons Nickol, Brent B., "Epizootiology: [Chapter 9 in Biology of the Acanthocephala]" (1985). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 505. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/505 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Nickol in Biology of the Acanthocephala (ed. by Crompton & Nickol) Copyright 1985, Cambridge University Press. Used by permission. 9 Epizootiology Brent B. Nickol 9.1 Introduction In practice, epizootiology deals with how parasites spread through host populations, how rapidly the spread occurs and whether or not epizootics result. Prevalence, incidence, factors that permit establishment ofinfection, host response to infection, parasite fecundity and methods of transfer are, therefore, aspects of epizootiology. Indeed, most aspects of a parasite could be related in sorne way to epizootiology, but many ofthese topics are best considered in other contexts. General patterns of transmission, adaptations that facilitate transmission, establishment of infection and occurrence of epizootics are discussed in this chapter. When life cycles are unknown, little progress can be made in under­ standing the epizootiological aspects ofany group ofparasites.
    [Show full text]