(Acanthocephala). David Joseph Demont Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Acanthocephala). David Joseph Demont Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1978 The Life Cycle and Ecology of Octospiniferoides Chandleri Bullock 1957 (Acanthocephala). David Joseph Demont Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Demont, David Joseph, "The Life Cycle and Ecology of Octospiniferoides Chandleri Bullock 1957 (Acanthocephala)." (1978). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3276. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3276 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)” . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. I f necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases we have filmed the best available copy. University Microfilms International 300 N. ZEFB ROAD, ANN ARBOR, Ml 48106 18 BEDFORD ROW, LONDON WC1 R 4FJ, ENGLAND DEMONTg DAVID JOSEPH THE LIFE CYCLE AND ECOLOGY OF OCTOSPINIFEROiDES CHANDLER! BULLOCK 1957 (ACANTHOCEPHALA I> THE LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COL-* PH«D-a 1 9 7 8 University M icrofilm s International 3GO N ZLLB HOAD, ANN ARBOR, Ml 48106 © 1979 DAVID JOSEPH DEMONT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE LIFE CYCLE AND ECOLOGY OF Octospiniferoides chandleri BULLOCK 1957 (ACANTHOCEPHALA) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Marine Sciences by David Joseph DeMont B.A., San Jose State College, 1967 M.S., Humboldt State College, 1971 December 1978 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major professor, Dr. C. F. Bryan, who sustained me with his confidence and assured my financial support throughout the course of this study. I thank my dissertation committee members, Drs. J. M. Coleman, L. L. Glasgow, J. G. Gosselink, H. H. Roberts, and J. H. Stone for their assistance in defining the direction and scope of my research and for their valuable contributions to the final draft of the dissertation. Special thanks are due to Dr. K. C. Corkum who provided me with more support and assistance than is normally required from a minor advisor. My gratitude is extended to Dr. J. Van Conner for many stimulating discussions, identification of fishes, and for frequent assistance during the field portion of the study. L. T. Beck, V. Guillory, G. Horst, S. J. Levine, T. O'Brien, H. J. Walker and especially D. S. Sabins all collected fishes for me at some time during the study. Dr. K. L. Koonce, P. Downey, and especially R. P. Gallagher helped me with the data analysis. Thank you all, gentlemen. I wish to thank Drs. J. Avault and D. D. Culley of the L.S.U. fisheries faculty for their donation of laboratory space and equipment. I extend thanks to Dr. W. A. Van Den Bold for confirming my identi­ fication of Cypridopsis vidua and for his assistance in enlisting Dr. D. McGreggor of the Argonne National Laboratory to identify Physocypria p u s t u l o s a . The dissertation would never have reached final form without the able assistance of my wife, Astrid, who typed early drafts and Mrs. Kitty Conner who typed the final. Thank you, ladies. ii Financial support for the study was supplied through research grants from Gulf States Utilities Co., Louisiana Department of Wild­ life and Fisheries, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the East Baton Rouge City-Parish Government. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES ................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES. ................... vii ABSTRACT .......................................................... ix INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 The Study Area ................................................. 2 B a c k g r o u n d ...................................................... 11 Acanthocephala General .................................. 11 The Parasite - Octospiniferoides chandleri .......... 13 The Host - Gambusia affinis affinis ................... 14 METHODS ............................................................. 19 Examination of Fishes ....................................... 19 Life Cycle Investigation ............................... 20 Seasonal Dynamics ............................................ 22 Data Treatment ................................................. 23 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .......................................... 26 Life Cycle and Development. ............................. 26 Development in Ostracod H o s t ........................... 26 Development in Fish H o s t ................................ 30 Natural Transfer of Infections ........................ 43 iv Page Spatial Distributions ....................................... 49 Distributions Among Habitats and Host Species. 49 Interspecific Competition ............................... 53 Frequency Distributions ................................. 58 Effect of Host Size and Sex ............................. 63 Site Preference ........................ 55 Summary of Spatial Distributions ...................... 70 Temporal Distributions ....................................... 71 Seasonal Changes in Abundance and Maturation .... 71 Recruitment and Mortality Rates ........................ 83 Agreement of Parasite and Host Seasonal Patterns . 89 Effect of Host Feeding Behavior ........................ 94 Demography ......................................... 96 Summary of Temporal Distributions ...................... 101 Effects upon the H o s t ....................................... 104 Effect upon Fat Storage ................................. 104 Effect upon Fecundity .................................... 109 Effect upon Host Population ............................ 110 Summary of Ch chandleri Effects .......................... 119 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................... 120 Life C y c l e ..................................................... 120 Spatial Distributions ....................................... 120 Temporal Distributions ............................. 121 Effects upon the H o s t ....................................... 121 LITERATURE CITED ................................................. 122 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Neoechinorhynchid acanthocephalan life cycles which have been confirmed by experimentation. 15 2. Incidence of Octospiniferoides chandleri and Neoechinorhynchus cylindratus infection in the ostracods Cypridopsls vidua and Physocypria pustulosa collected at two levels in Tramline Pond, summer and fall, 1975. 44 3. Distribution of Octospiniferoides chandleri among fishes in the Alligator Bayou drainage. 50 4. Distribution of Octospiniferoides chandleri infections in Gambusia affinis among some southern Louisiana aquatic habitats. 52 5. Incidence and intensity of Homalometron armatum and Octospiniferoides chandleri from experimental concurrent infections in Gambusia affinis. 57 6. Distribution statistics for the most abundant helminth endoparasites of Gambusia affinis in Tramline Pond. 62 7. Seasonal changes in population parameters and maturation in acanthocephalan parasites of fishes. 80 8. Reproductive states of female Gambusia affinis larger than 26 mm (total length) in Tramline Pond, October, 1974 - December, 1975. 90 9. Reproductive states of female Gambusia affinis larger than 26 mm (total length) in Alligator Bayou and
Recommended publications
  • Review of Acanthocephala (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae) of America North of Mexico with a Key to Species
    Zootaxa 2835: 30–40 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Review of Acanthocephala (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae) of America north of Mexico with a key to species J. E. McPHERSON1, RICHARD J. PACKAUSKAS2, ROBERT W. SITES3, STEVEN J. TAYLOR4, C. SCOTT BUNDY5, JEFFREY D. BRADSHAW6 & PAULA LEVIN MITCHELL7 1Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, Fort Hays State University, Hays, Kansas 67601, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3Enns Entomology Museum, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, & Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 6Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Panhandle Research & Extension Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69361, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 7Department of Biology, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29733, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A review of Acanthocephala of America north of Mexico is presented with an updated key to species. A. confraterna is considered a junior synonym of A. terminalis, thus reducing the number of known species in this region from five to four. New state and country records are presented. Key words: Coreidae, Coreinae, Acanthocephalini, Acanthocephala, North America, review, synonymy, key, distribution Introduction The genus Acanthocephala Laporte currently is represented in America north of Mexico by five species: Acan- thocephala (Acanthocephala) declivis (Say), A.
    [Show full text]
  • Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. III - Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A. Schmidt-Rhaesa PLATYHELMINTHES, NEMERTEA, AND “ASCHELMINTHES” A. Schmidt-Rhaesa University of Bielefeld, Germany Keywords: Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Gnathifera, Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, Rotifera, Acanthocephala, Cycliophora, Nemathelminthes, Gastrotricha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera Contents 1. Introduction 2. General Morphology 3. Platyhelminthes, the Flatworms 4. Nemertea (Nemertini), the Ribbon Worms 5. “Aschelminthes” 5.1. Gnathifera 5.1.1. Gnathostomulida 5.1.2. Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) 5.1.3. Rotifera 5.1.4. Acanthocephala 5.1.5. Cycliophora (Symbion pandora) 5.2. Nemathelminthes 5.2.1. Gastrotricha 5.2.2. Nematoda, the Roundworms 5.2.3. Nematomorpha, the Horsehair Worms 5.2.4. Priapulida 5.2.5. Kinorhyncha 5.2.6. Loricifera Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS This chapter provides information on several basal bilaterian groups: flatworms, nemerteans, Gnathifera,SAMPLE and Nemathelminthes. CHAPTERS These include species-rich taxa such as Nematoda and Platyhelminthes, and as taxa with few or even only one species, such as Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) and Cycliophora (Symbion pandora). All Acanthocephala and subgroups of Platyhelminthes and Nematoda, are parasites that often exhibit complex life cycles. Most of the taxa described are marine, but some have also invaded freshwater or the terrestrial environment. “Aschelminthes” are not a natural group, instead, two taxa have been recognized that were earlier summarized under this name. Gnathifera include taxa with a conspicuous jaw apparatus such as Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and Rotifera. Although they do not possess a jaw apparatus, Acanthocephala also belong to Gnathifera due to their epidermal structure. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa 20Th Anniversary Celebration: Section Acanthocephala
    Zootaxa 4979 (1): 031–037 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Editorial ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4979.1.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:047940CE-817A-4AE3-8E28-4FB03EBC8DEA Zootaxa 20th Anniversary Celebration: section Acanthocephala SCOTT MONKS Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Apartado Postal 1-10, C.P. 42001, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México and Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0514, USA [email protected]; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5041-8582 Abstract Of 32 papers including Acanthocephala that were published in Zootaxa from 2001 to 2020, 5, by 11 authors from 5 countries, described 5 new species and redescribed 1 known species and 27 checklists from 11 countries and/geographical regions by 72 authors. A bibliographic analysis of these papers, the number of species reported in the checklists, and a list of new species are presented in this paper. Key words: Acanthocephala, new species, checklist, bibliography The Phylum Acanthocephala is a relatively small group of endoparasitic helminths (helminths = worm-like animals that are parasites; not a monophyletic group). Adults use vertebrates as definitive hosts (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals), eggs are passed in the feces and infect arthropods (insects and crustacean) as intermediate hosts, where the cystacanth develops, and the cystacanth infects the definitive host when it is ingested. In some cases, fishes, reptiles, and amphibians that eat arthropods serve as paratenic (transport) hosts to bridge ecological barriers to adults of a species that typically does not feed on arthropods.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoechinorhynchus Pimelodi Sp.N. (Eoacanthocephala
    NEOECHINORHYNCHUS PIMELODI SP.N. (EOACANTHOCEPHALA, NEOECHINORHYNCHIDAE) PARASITIZING PIMELODUS MACULATUS LACÉPEDE, "MANDI-AMARELO" (SILUROIDEI, PIMELODIDAE) FROM THE BASIN OF THE SÃO FRANCISCO RIVER, TRÊS MARIAS, MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL Marilia de Carvalho Brasil-Sato 1 Gilberto Cezar Pavanelli 2 ABSTRACT. Neoechillorhynchus pimelodi sp.n. is described as the first record of Acanthocephala in Pimelodlls macula/lIs Lacépéde, 1803, collected in the São Fran­ cisco ri ver, Três Marias, Minas Gerais. The new spec ies is distinguished from other of the genus by lhe lhree circles of hooks of different sizes, and by lhe eggs measurements. The hooks measuring 100- 112 (105), 32-40 (36) and 20-27 (23) in length in lhe males and 102-1 42 (129), 34-55 (47) and 27-35 (29) in lenglh in lhe fema les for the anterior, middle and posterior circles. The eggs measuring 15-22 (18) in length and 12- 15 ( 14) in width, with concentric layers oftexture smooth, enveloping lhe acanthor. KEY WORDS. Acanlhocephala, Neoechinorhynchidae, Neoechino/'hynchus p imelodi sp.n., Pimelodlls macula/lIs, São Francisco ri ver, Brazil Among the Acanthocephala species listed in the genus Neoechinorhynchus Hamann, 1892 by GOLVAN (1994), the 1'ollowing parasitize 1'reshwater fishes in Brazil : Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae Go lvan, 1956, N. paraguayensis Machado Filho, 1959, N. pterodoridis Thatcher, 1981 and N. golvani Salgado-Maldonado, 1978, in the Amazon Region, N. curemai Noronha, 1973, in the states of Pará, Amazonas and Rio de Janeiro, and N. macronucleatus Machado Filho, 1954, in the state 01' Espirito Santo. ln the present report Neoechinorhynchus pimelodi sp.n. infectingPimelodus maculatus Lacépede, 1803 (Siluroidei, Pimelodidae), collected in the São Francisco River, Três Marias, Minas Gerais, Brazil is described.
    [Show full text]
  • Helminth Parasites (Trematoda, Cestoda, Nematoda, Acanthocephala) of Herpetofauna from Southeastern Oklahoma: New Host and Geographic Records
    125 Helminth Parasites (Trematoda, Cestoda, Nematoda, Acanthocephala) of Herpetofauna from Southeastern Oklahoma: New Host and Geographic Records Chris T. McAllister Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745 Charles R. Bursey Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University-Shenango, Sharon, PA 16146 Matthew B. Connior Life Sciences, Northwest Arkansas Community College, Bentonville, AR 72712 Abstract: Between May 2013 and September 2015, two amphibian and eight reptilian species/ subspecies were collected from Atoka (n = 1) and McCurtain (n = 31) counties, Oklahoma, and examined for helminth parasites. Twelve helminths, including a monogenean, six digeneans, a cestode, three nematodes and two acanthocephalans was found to be infecting these hosts. We document nine new host and three new distributional records for these helminths. Although we provide new records, additional surveys are needed for some of the 257 species of amphibians and reptiles of the state, particularly those in the western and panhandle regions who remain to be examined for helminths. ©2015 Oklahoma Academy of Science Introduction Methods In the last two decades, several papers from Between May 2013 and September 2015, our laboratories have appeared in the literature 11 Sequoyah slimy salamander (Plethodon that has helped increase our knowledge of sequoyah), nine Blanchard’s cricket frog the helminth parasites of Oklahoma’s diverse (Acris blanchardii), two eastern cooter herpetofauna (McAllister and Bursey 2004, (Pseudemys concinna concinna), two common 2007, 2012; McAllister et al. 1995, 2002, snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), two 2005, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014a, b, c; Bonett Mississippi mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum et al. 2011). However, there still remains a hippocrepis), two western cottonmouth lack of information on helminths of some of (Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma), one the 257 species of amphibians and reptiles southern black racer (Coluber constrictor of the state (Sievert and Sievert 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Esox Lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Ryan Hagerty/USFWS. Public Domain – Government Work. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/26990/rec/22. (February 1, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Circumpolar in fresh water. North America: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from Labrador to Alaska and south to Pennsylvania and Nebraska, USA [Page and Burr 2011]. Eurasia: Caspian, Black, Baltic, White, Barents, Arctic, North and Aral Seas and Atlantic basins, southwest to Adour drainage; Mediterranean basin in Rhône drainage and northern Italy. Widely distributed in central Asia and Siberia easward [sic] to Anadyr drainage (Bering Sea basin). Historically absent from Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean France, central Italy, southern and western Greece, eastern Adriatic basin, Iceland, western Norway and northern Scotland.” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Esox lucius as native in Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Monaco, 1 Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States (including Alaska). From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Occurs in Erqishi river and Ulungur lake [in China].” “Known from the Selenge drainage [in Mongolia] [Kottelat 2006].” “[In Turkey:] Known from the European Black Sea watersheds, Anatolian Black Sea watersheds, Central and Western Anatolian lake watersheds, and Gulf watersheds (Firat Nehri, Dicle Nehri).
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Culture of Neoechinorhynchus Buttnerae
    Original Article ISSN 1984-2961 (Electronic) www.cbpv.org.br/rbpv Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol., Jaboticabal, v. 27, n. 4, p. 562-569, oct.-dec. 2018 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-296120180079 In vitro culture of Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae): Influence of temperature and culture media Cultivo in vitro de Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae): influência da temperatura e dos meios de cultura Carinne Moreira de Souza Costa1; Talissa Beatriz Costa Lima1; Matheus Gomes da Cruz1; Daniela Volcan Almeida1; Maurício Laterça Martins2; Gabriela Tomas Jerônimo2* 1 Programa de Pós-graduação em Aquicultura, Universidade Nilton Lins, Manaus, AM, Brasil 2 Laboratório Sanidade de Organismos Aquáticos – AQUOS, Departamento de Aquicultura, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil Received August 9, 2018 Accepted September 10, 2018 Abstract Infection by the acantocephalan Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae is considered one of most important concerns for tambaqui fish (Colossoma macropomum) production. Treatment strategies have been the focus of several in vivo studies; however, few studies have been undertaken on in vitro protocols for parasite maintenance. The aim of the present study was to develop the best in vitro culture condition for N. buttnerae to ensure its survival and adaptation out of the host to allow for the testing of substances to be used to control the parasite. To achieve this, parasites were collected from naturally infected fish and distributed in 6-well culture plates under the following treatments in triplicate: 0.9% NaCl, sterile tank water, L-15 Leibovitz culture medium, L-15 Leibovitz + agar 2% culture medium, RPMI 1640 culture medium, and RPMI 1640 + agar 2% culture medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Bioinspired Parasite Details
    A p p e n d i x : B i o i n s p i r e d P a r a s i t e Details Internal Parasites: Endoparasites Biological endoparasites live inside a hosts’ body. In farms, biological parasites infect, hurt, and even kill animals, hurting a farming business. This book is look- ing for inspiration from biology to prevent or treat business “disease.” In business, there are many opportunities for inoculation and treatment. Brain Jackers—Acanthocephala— Thorny-Headed Worms Thorny-headed worms are rare in humans, and also cause disease in birds, amphibians, and reptiles. They are called thorny-headed because they use a bio- logical lancet to pierce and hold onto the stomach walls of the host (Wikipedia, 2013). Their lifecycle includes invertebrates, fish, lizards, birds, and mammals. In one stage of their lifecycle, they “brain jack” a small crustacean eaten by ducks. Just as inner-city drivers are subject to “car-jacking,” this parasite actually redi- rects the crustacean’s dominant behavior from staying away from light to actively seeking it—where ducks may be more likely to eat them, and where the parasite reproduces (Wikipedia, 2013). Alaskan Inuit have a zest for raw fish and that contributes to their increased incidence of Acanthocephala infection compared with other groups of people (Roberts & Janovy, 2009, p. 506). Prevention and Treatment for Acanthocephala Endoscopic and X-ray examinations detect Acanthocephala because their eggs are not passed through feces (Mehlhorn, 2008, p. 25). Controlling the spread of rodents, as well as protecting and cooking food prevents infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Smaller Protostome Phyla: Rotifera, Gastrotricha, Nematomorpha & Acanthocephala Bio 1413: General Zoology Lab (Ziser, 2008) [Exercise 10B] Lab Activities: 1
    Smaller Protostome Phyla: Rotifera, Gastrotricha, Nematomorpha & Acanthocephala Bio 1413: General Zoology Lab (Ziser, 2008) [Exercise 10B] Lab Activities: 1. Rotifers (p167) slide: Rotifers, wm • Examine prepared slide of a rotifer and be able to identify the following structures: corona, foot, mastax, digestive tract, reproductive tract • Attempt to locate and to identify living rotifers from the water samples provided • Recognize and identify rotifers on illustrations and be able to identify to Phylum 2. Gastrotrichs (p167) slide: Gastrotrichs, wm • Observe living specimens (if available) and note their appearance and movement • examine prepared slides of a gastrotrich and identify: mouth, pharynx, adhesive gland, scales 3. Nematomorpha (p168) preserved: horsehair worms • examine living and/or preserved horsehair worms as available and be able to recognize them and distinguish them from other “wormlike” phyla 4. Acanthocephala (p168) • examine preserved specimens and slides as available and be able to recognize them and distinguish them from other “wormlike” phyla eg. Macracanthorhynchus preserved: Macracanthorhynchus this animal is parasitic in the intestine of pigs, the larvae develop in beetle grubs which are eaten by pigs to complete its life cycle eg. examine the prepared slide slide: acanthoceophala, wm identify the following: retractable proboscis with hooks, proboscis receptacle, ligament sac Notebook Suggestions: Describe the kinds of movement seen in live rotifers and compare to the movement seen in roundworms; is it similar? Diagram some of the variety of rotifers in samples and illustrations; what characteristics do all share; how do each differ If living gastrotrichs are available, describe how their movement differs from that of rotifers. Can you identify any organs on the gastrotrich Describe the similarities and differences between acanthocephala and nematomorpha make a diagram of the general life cycle of a horsehair worm and an acanthocephalan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life Cycle of the Parasite Pomphorhynchus Tereticollis in Reference to 0+ Cyprinids and the Intermediate Host Gammarus Spp in the UK
    March 2020 The life cycle of the parasite Pomphorhynchus tereticollis in reference to 0+ cyprinids and the intermediate host Gammarus spp in the UK. Matthew J Harris Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master’s By Research Bournemouth University Supervisory team; Iain Green, Robert Britton and Demetra Andreou Acknowledgments I would like to thank all of my supervisors for the support they have given me through the project in regard to their enormous plethora of knowledge. In particular I would like to thank Dr Demetra Andreou as without her support, motivation and can-do attitude I may not have been able to finish this project. It was also Dr Andreou who originally inspired me to purse Parasitological studies and without her inspiration in my undergraduate studies, it is unlikely I would have studied a MRes as parasitology bewilders me like no field I have ever come across. I would also like to thank Dr Catherine Gutman-Roberts for allowing me access to samples that she had previously collected. As well as this, Dr Gutmann-Roberts was always helpful and friendly when questions were directed at her. Finally, I would also like to thank her for the help she gave to me regarding field work. Abstract Pomphorhynchus tereticollis is a recently resurrected parasite species that spans the UK and continental Europe. The parasite is the only Pomphorhynchus spp in the UK and has been researched since the early 1970’s. The species has an indirect life cycle which uses a Gammarus spp as an intermediate host and cyprinids and salmonids as final hosts although the main hosts are Squalis cephalus (S.
    [Show full text]
  • (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and Their Manipulative Acanthocephalan Parasites
    Effect of the environment on the interaction between gammarids (Crustacea : Amphipoda) and their manipulative acanthocephalan parasites Sophie Labaude To cite this version: Sophie Labaude. Effect of the environment on the interaction between gammarids (Crustacea :Am- phipoda) and their manipulative acanthocephalan parasites. Symbiosis. Université de Bourgogne, 2016. English. NNT : 2016DIJOS022. tel-01486123 HAL Id: tel-01486123 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01486123 Submitted on 9 Mar 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Université de Bourgogne UMR CNRS 6282 Biogéosciences PhD Thesis Thèse pour l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Université de Bourgogne Discipline : Sciences de la vie Spécialité : Biologie des populations et écologie Effect of the environment on the interaction between gammarids (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and their manipulative acanthocephalan parasites Sophie Labaude Jury Demetra Andreou, Senior Lecturer, Bournemouth University Examinateur Iain Barber, Senior Lecturer, University of Leicester Rapporteur Jean-Nicolas
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 in Biology of the Acanthocephala]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 1985 Epizootiology: [Chapter 9 in Biology of the Acanthocephala] Brent B. Nickol University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Parasitology Commons Nickol, Brent B., "Epizootiology: [Chapter 9 in Biology of the Acanthocephala]" (1985). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 505. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/505 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Nickol in Biology of the Acanthocephala (ed. by Crompton & Nickol) Copyright 1985, Cambridge University Press. Used by permission. 9 Epizootiology Brent B. Nickol 9.1 Introduction In practice, epizootiology deals with how parasites spread through host populations, how rapidly the spread occurs and whether or not epizootics result. Prevalence, incidence, factors that permit establishment ofinfection, host response to infection, parasite fecundity and methods of transfer are, therefore, aspects of epizootiology. Indeed, most aspects of a parasite could be related in sorne way to epizootiology, but many ofthese topics are best considered in other contexts. General patterns of transmission, adaptations that facilitate transmission, establishment of infection and occurrence of epizootics are discussed in this chapter. When life cycles are unknown, little progress can be made in under­ standing the epizootiological aspects ofany group ofparasites.
    [Show full text]