DOCSLIB.ORG

Drug Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drug Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens Origin and Proliferation of Multiple- Drug Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Chang, Hsiao-Han, Ted Cohen, Yonatan H. Grad, William P. Hanage, Thomas F. O’Brien, and Marc Lipsitch. 2015. “Origin and Proliferation of Multiple-Drug Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens.” Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79 (1) (February 4): 101–116. doi:10.1128/ mmbr.00039-14. Published Version doi:10.1128/MMBR.00039-14 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26882169 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA crossmark Origin and Proliferation of Multiple-Drug Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens Hsiao-Han Chang,a Ted Cohen,a,b Yonatan H. Grad,a,c William P. Hanage,a Thomas F. O’Brien,d Marc Lipsitcha,e Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USAa; Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USAb; Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USAc; The World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USAd; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USAe SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................102 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................102 THE EXCESS OF MDR IN BACTERIA.........................................................................................................................102 Streptococcus pneumoniae................................................................................................................................102 Enterobacteriaceae........................................................................................................................................102 Neisseria gonorrhoeae.....................................................................................................................................102 Mycobacterium tuberculosis...............................................................................................................................103 Staphylococcus aureus ....................................................................................................................................103 MECHANISMS LEADING TO EXCESS MDR .................................................................................................................104 Explanations for the Origin of MDR Strains ..............................................................................................................104 Single biochemical mechanism conferring resistance to multiple drugs..............................................................................104 (i) Testable predictions ..............................................................................................................................104 (ii) Practical implications ............................................................................................................................105 Genetic linkage ........................................................................................................................................105 (i) Examples .........................................................................................................................................105 (ii) Testable predictions .............................................................................................................................105 (iii) Practical implications ............................................................................................................................105 Highly mutable or recombinogenic bacterial lineages ................................................................................................106 (i) Examples .........................................................................................................................................107 (ii) Complexities .....................................................................................................................................107 (iii) Testable predictions .............................................................................................................................107 (iv) Practical implications............................................................................................................................107 Multidrug therapy with accelerated treatment failure in resistant infections..........................................................................107 (i) Example ..........................................................................................................................................108 (ii) Testable predictions .............................................................................................................................108 (iii) Practical implications ............................................................................................................................108 Explanations for the Proliferation of MDR Strains.........................................................................................................108 Associated linkage selection...........................................................................................................................108 (i) Examples .........................................................................................................................................108 (ii) Testable predictions .............................................................................................................................109 (iii) Practical implications ............................................................................................................................109 Bystander selection ....................................................................................................................................109 (i) Examples .........................................................................................................................................109 (ii) Testable predictions .............................................................................................................................110 (iii) Practical implications ............................................................................................................................110 Positive epistasis between drug resistance determinants or between resistance determinants and genetic background............................110 (i) Examples .........................................................................................................................................110 (ii) Testable predictions .............................................................................................................................110 (iii) Practical implications ............................................................................................................................110 Niche differentiation: aggregation of multiple drug selection pressures within specific populations..................................................111 (continued) Published 4 February 2015 Citation Chang H-H, Cohen T, Grad YH, Hanage WP, O’Brien TF, Lipsitch M. 4 February 2015. Origin and proliferation of multiple-drug resistance in bacterial pathogens. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev doi:10.1128/MMBR.00039-14. Address correspondence to Marc Lipsitch, [email protected]. Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00039-14 March 2015 Volume 79 Number 1 Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews mmbr.asm.org 101 Chang et al. (i) Examples .........................................................................................................................................111 (ii) Testable predictions .............................................................................................................................111 (iii) Practical implications ............................................................................................................................111 Importation of MDR strains and geographic source-sink dynamics ...................................................................................111 (i) Example ..........................................................................................................................................111 (ii) Testable predictions .............................................................................................................................111 (iii) Practical implications ............................................................................................................................111 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................111
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mechanisms and Strategies to Overcome Multiple Drug Resistance in Cancer
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector FEBS Letters 580 (2006) 2903–2909 Minireview Mechanisms and strategies to overcome multiple drug resistance in cancer Tomris Ozben* Akdeniz University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, 07070 Antalya, Turkey Received 30 January 2006; accepted 9 February 2006 Available online 17 February 2006 Edited by Horst Feldmann The cytotoxic drugs that are most frequently associated with Abstract One of the major problems in chemotherapy is multi- drug resistance (MDR) against anticancer drugs. ATP-binding MDR are hydrophobic, amphipathic natural products, such as cassette (ABC) transporters are a family of proteins that medi- the taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel), vinca alkaloids (vinorel- ate MDR via ATP-dependent drug efflux pumps. Many MDR bine, vincristine, and vinblastine), anthracyclines (doxorubicin, inhibitors have been identified, but none of them have been pro- daunorubicin, and epirubicin), epipodophyllotoxins (etoposide ven clinically useful without side effects. Efforts continue to dis- and teniposide), antimetabolites (methorexate, fluorouracil, cover not toxic MDR inhibitors which lack pharmacokinetic cytosar, 5-azacytosine, 6-mercaptopurine, and gemcitabine) interactions with anticancer drugs. Novel approaches have also topotecan, dactinomycin, and mitomycin C [4,6–8]. been designed to inhibit or circumvent MDR. In this review, Overexpression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters the structure and function of ABC transporters and development has been shown to be responsible for MDR [5]. Therefore eluci- of MDR inhibitors are described briefly including various ap- dation of the structure and function for each ABC transporter is proaches to suppress MDR mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of Cytokeratin Confers Multiple Drug Resistance (Multidrug Resance/Cytoskeleton) PATRICIA A
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 5311-5314, June 1994 Pharmacology Expression of cytokeratin confers multiple drug resistance (multidrug resance/cytoskeleton) PATRICIA A. BAUMAN*, WILLIAM S. DALTON*t, JOHN M. ANDERSONt, AND ANNE E. CRESSO§ Departments of *Pharmacology and Toxicology, tMedicine, and *Radiation Oncology, The University of Arizona, The Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85724 Communicated by Gertrude B. Elion, February 23, 1994 (received for review October 21, 1993) ABSTRACT The cytokeratin network is an extensive fda- We utilized a mouse fibroblast cell line and a transfected mentous structure in the cytoplasm whose biological function(s) variant expressing cytokeratins 8 and 18 (9) to test whether is unknown. Based upon previous data showing the modifica- cytokeratin expression could alter the cell survival response tion ofcytokeratin by mitoxantrone, we investigated the ability to six different chemotherapeutic drugs. of cytokeratin networks to influence the survival response of cells to chemotherapeutic agents. We have compared the MATERIALS AND METHODS survival of mouse L fibroblasts lacking cytokeratins with that of L cells transfected with cytokeratins 8 and 18 in the presence Tumor Cell Lines, Growth Curves, and Cell Cycle Distri- of chemotherapeutic drugs. The expression of cytokeratins 8 butions. Parental L cells and transfected LK8+18 cells were and 18 conferred a multiple drug resistance phenotype on cells obtained from Robert Oshima (La Jolla Cancer Research exposed to mitoxantrone, doxorubicin, methotrexate, melpha- Foundation, La Jolla, CA) and maintained as described (9). Ian, Colcemid, and vincristine. The degree of drug resistance Mock transfectants (LPBMOC) were created by simultane- was 5-454 times that of parental cells, depending upon the ous calcium phosphate transfection of pGEM-3 (Promega) agent used.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Pharmacology 1: Phase 1 Studies and Early Drug Development
    Clinical Pharmacology 1: Phase 1 Studies and Early Drug Development Gerlie Gieser, Ph.D. Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Div. IV Objectives • Outline the Phase 1 studies conducted to characterize the Clinical Pharmacology of a drug; describe important design elements of and the information gained from these studies. • List the Clinical Pharmacology characteristics of an Ideal Drug • Describe how the Clinical Pharmacology information from Phase 1 can help design Phase 2/3 trials • Discuss the timing of Clinical Pharmacology studies during drug development, and provide examples of how the information generated could impact the overall clinical development plan and product labeling. Phase 1 of Drug Development CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH PRE POST AND CLINICAL APPROVAL 1 DISCOVERY DEVELOPMENT 2 3 PHASE e e e s s s a a a h h h P P P Clinical Pharmacology Studies Initial IND (first in human) NDA/BLA SUBMISSION Phase 1 – studies designed mainly to investigate the safety/tolerability (if possible, identify MTD), pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an investigational drug in humans Clinical Pharmacology • Study of the Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of the drug in humans – PK: what the body does to the drug (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion) – PD: what the drug does to the body • PK and PD profiles of the drug are influenced by physicochemical properties of the drug, product/formulation, administration route, patient’s intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g., organ dysfunction, diseases, concomitant medications,
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Genetic and Nongenetic Variabilities With
    ASSOCIATION OF GENETIC AND NONGENETIC VARIABILITIES WITH PHENYTOIN AND CARBAMAZEPINE RESPONSE PHENOTYPES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY PORNPIMOL KIJSANAYOTIN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY RICHARD BRUNDAGE ADVISOR APRIL, 2012 © Pornpimol Kisanayotin 2012 Acknowledgements It has been a long time since I decided to pursue the PhD study in the US after receiving a scholarship from the Royal Thai Government. Without the following people I could not be able to follow my dream to successfully conduct this pharmacogenetic study for my PhD dissertation. First, I would like to express my deep gratitude to Prof. James C Cloyd and Prof. Ilo E Leppik for not only giving me the opportunity to carry out this research work by using data sets from the P50 program projects but also all their academic and financial support. I also would like to express my special gratitude to Prof. Richard Brundage, my advisor, for his kindness, academic advice as well as all his support and encouragement. I express my gratitude to Prof. William S Oetting, my co-advisor for his academic advice and encouraging words. I also express my gratitude to Prof. Richard King for allowing me to use his laboratory, facilities and providing technical support for genotyping work. I would like to thank Dr. Angela K Burnbaum and all the staff at the Epilepsy Reseach and Education Program, University of Minnesota for all their assistance in research. I would like to thank Dr. Elving Anderson for his kindness and academic advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Ligand Efficacy at the Mu- Opioid Receptor Using A
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Measuring ligand efficacy at the mu- opioid receptor using a conformational biosensor Kathryn E Livingston1,2, Jacob P Mahoney1,2, Aashish Manglik3, Roger K Sunahara4, John R Traynor1,2* 1Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States; 2Edward F Domino Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States; 3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States; 4Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, United States Abstract The intrinsic efficacy of orthosteric ligands acting at G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) reflects their ability to stabilize active receptor states (R*) and is a major determinant of their physiological effects. Here, we present a direct way to quantify the efficacy of ligands by measuring the binding of a R*-specific biosensor to purified receptor employing interferometry. As an example, we use the mu-opioid receptor (m-OR), a prototypic class A GPCR, and its active state sensor, nanobody-39 (Nb39). We demonstrate that ligands vary in their ability to recruit Nb39 to m- OR and describe methadone, loperamide, and PZM21 as ligands that support unique R* conformation(s) of m-OR. We further show that positive allosteric modulators of m-OR promote formation of R* in addition to enhancing promotion by orthosteric agonists. Finally, we demonstrate that the technique can be utilized with heterotrimeric G protein. The method is cell- free, signal transduction-independent and is generally applicable to GPCRs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32499.001 *For correspondence: [email protected] Competing interests: The authors declare that no Introduction competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimalarial Drug Efficacy and Drug Resistance: 2000–2010 WHO Library Cataloguing-In-Publication Data
    GLOBAL REPORT ON ANTIMALARIAL DRUG EFFICACY AND DRUG RESISTANCE: 2000–2010 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Global report on antimalarial drug efficacy and drug resistance: 2000-2010. 1.Malaria - prevention and control. 2.Malaria - drug therapy. 3.Antimalarials - therapeutic use. 4.Epidemiologic surveillance - methods. 5.Drug resistance. 6.Drug monitoring. 7.Treatment outcome. 8.Thailand. 8.Cambodia. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 150047 0 (NLM classification: QV 256) © World Health Organization 2010 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Drug Resistance: a Fast-Growing Threat
    Review Article ISSN: 2574 -1241 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.21.003572 Multiple Drug Resistance: A Fast-Growing Threat Eremwanarue Aibuedefe Osagie1,2* and Shittu Hakeem Olalekan1 1Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Benin, Nigeria 2Lahor Research Laboratories and Diagnostics Centre, Nigeria *Corresponding author: Eremwanarue Aibuedefe Osagie, Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Benin, Nigeria ARTICLE INFO Abstract Received: September 03, 2019 The spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria is a growing problem and a public health Published: September 10, 2019 issue. Over the years, various genetic mechanisms concerned with antibiotic resistance have been identified to be natural and acquired resistance. The natural resistance Citation: Eremwanarue Aibuedefe Osag- ie, Shittu Hakeem Olalekan. Multiple Geneticinvolved Elements mutation [MGEs] via target such modification,as plasmid, transposon reduced permeability, and integrons efflux genetic system elements and Drug Resistance: A Fast-Growing Threat. on the other hand, acquired resistance via horizontal gene tranfer include Moblie Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 21(2)-2019. Integrons are widely distributed, especially in Gram-negative bacteria; they are carried BJSTR. MS.ID.003572. bythat Mobile can acquire, Genetic exchange, Elements and such express as plasmids, genes embeddedand transposons, within whichGene Cassettespromote [GC].their spread within bacterial communities and have been studied mainly in the clinical setting Keywords: Antibiotics; Multiple Drug for their involvement in antibiotic resistance, their role in the environment is now an Resistant Bacteria; Mobile Genetic increasing focus of attention. The aim of this review is to educate the populise about Element; Integrons Plasmid the mechanisms of multiple drug resistance bacteria isolates and the danger ahead if appropriate regulations are not put in place especially in developing country like Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Expert Group on Drug Efficacy and Response 1–2 June 2017 Room M 605, Headquarters, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
    Global Malaria Programme Technical Expert Group on Drug Efficacy and Response 1–2 June 2017 Room M 605, Headquarters, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland Minutes of the Technical Expert Group on Drug Efficacy and Response This document was prepared as a pre-read for the meeting of the Malaria Policy Advisory Committee and is not an official document of the World Health Organization. WHO/HTM/GMP/MPAC/201712 Page 2 of 35 Minutes of the Technical Expert Group on Drug Efficacy and Response Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Summary and recommendations............................................................................................................ 5 1 Welcome and introduction of guest speakers ................................................................................ 9 2 Declarations of interest................................................................................................................... 9 3 Minutes and action points of TEG 2015 .......................................................................................... 9 4 Session 1. Molecular markers: genotyping and monitoring drug resistance ................................. 9 4.1 Molecular markers of piperaquine resistance .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Key Determinants of Drug Activity
    CASE STUDY Dr. Kevin Lustig, President and CEO, The Assay Depot, Inc. Greater San Diego Area Understanding Key Determinants of Drug Activity SUMMARY This article highlights the increasing role that drug metabolism and transport proteins have in the drug approval process. CASE STUDY: The Assay Depot, Inc. The dynamics of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters is critical to the development of personalized medicine strategies. Abstract / Summary The dynamics of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters is critical to the develop- ment of personalized medicine strategies. A multitude of factors regulate enzymes and transporters, which in turn affect the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs and medi- ate drug interactions. Evaluation of drug interaction profiles is a critical step in drug development and necessitates detailed in vitro and in vivo studies along with predictive modeling. PharmaPendium® via its Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters Module provides unprecedented depth of data on drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters and offers a unique platform for modeling advanced drug interactions. This Module will prove to be a valuable resource capable of improving workflows and accelerating devel- opment by enabling intelligent, in silico drug design. By providing scientists with all of the available knowledge about drug metabolism, we can significantly reduce the need for costly and time-consuming lab work and animal models. Requiring these only to answer the true unknowns where no one else has gone before. Introduction Every successful drug discovery and development effort needs to factor in drug efficacy Dr. Kevin Lustig, Author and safety, both of which are intimately linked to drug metabolism. Hence knowledge President & CEO, The Assay Depot Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacology of Drugs Used in Children
    Drug and Fluid Th erapy SECTION II Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacology of Drugs Used CHAPTER 6 in Children Charles J. Coté, Jerrold Lerman, Robert M. Ward, Ralph A. Lugo, and Nishan Goudsouzian Drug Distribution Propofol Protein Binding Ketamine Body Composition Etomidate Metabolism and Excretion Muscle Relaxants Hepatic Blood Flow Succinylcholine Renal Excretion Intermediate-Acting Nondepolarizing Relaxants Pharmacokinetic Principles and Calculations Atracurium First-Order Kinetics Cisatracurium Half-Life Vecuronium First-Order Single-Compartment Kinetics Rocuronium First-Order Multiple-Compartment Kinetics Clinical Implications When Using Short- and Zero-Order Kinetics Intermediate-Acting Relaxants Apparent Volume of Distribution Long-Acting Nondepolarizing Relaxants Repetitive Dosing and Drug Accumulation Pancuronium Steady State Antagonism of Muscle Relaxants Loading Dose General Principles Central Nervous System Effects Suggamadex The Drug Approval Process, the Package Insert, and Relaxants in Special Situations Drug Labeling Opioids Inhalation Anesthetic Agents Morphine Physicochemical Properties Meperidine Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Anesthetics Hydromorphone Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Anesthetics Oxycodone Clinical Effects Methadone Nitrous Oxide Fentanyl Environmental Impact Alfentanil Oxygen Sufentanil Intravenous Anesthetic Agents Remifentanil Barbiturates Butorphanol and Nalbuphine 89 A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children Codeine Antiemetics Tramadol Metoclopramide Nonsteroidal Anti-infl ammatory Agents 5-Hydroxytryptamine
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Oral and Injectable Medicine Outline
    Comparison of pharmacokinetics and efficacy of oral and injectable medicine Outline • Background • Results – Antibiotics – Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) – Vitamins • Conclusions and recommendations Outline • Background • Results – Antibiotics – Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) – Vitamins • Conclusions and recommendations Injections given with sterile and reused South America (lower mortality) equipment worldwide Central Europe South America (higher mortality) West Africa Injections given with non-sterile equipment East and Southern Africa Injections given with sterile equipment South East Asia Regions China and Pacific Eastern Europe and Central Asia South Asia Middle East Crescent - 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 Number of injections per person and per year Injections: A dangerous engine of disease • Hepatitis B – Highly infectious virus – Highest number of infections (21 million annually) – 32% of HBV infections • Hepatitis C – More than 2 million infections each year – More than 40% of HCV infections • HIV – More than 260 000 infections – Approximately 5% of HIV infections Reported common conditions leading to injection prescription • Infections • Asthma – Fever • Other – Upper Respiratory – Malaise Infection/ Ear Infection – Fatigue – Pneumonia – Old Age – Tonsillitis – Pelvic Inflammatory Disease – Skin Infections – Diarrhea – Urinary tract infection Simonsen et al. WHO 1999 Reported injectable medicines commonly used • Antibiotics • Anti-inflammatory agents / Analgesics • Vitamins Simonsen et al. WHO 1999
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Projects
    INVENTORY OF PROJECTS PROGRESS REPORT: IMPLEMENTATION OF A PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION PLAN TO COMBAT ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE PROGRESS THROUGH 2007 FOCUS AREA I: SURVEILLANCE ACTION ITEM #1: DETERMINE WHICH ORGANISMS AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO SPECIFIC ANTIMICROBIAL DRUGS SHOULD BE UNDER SURVEILLANCE AND CREATE A MECHANISM FOR PERIODIC UPDATING OF THIS LIST. PROJECT TITLE: PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE • Agency: CDC, USDA, FDA, DoD, VA • Description: Organisms currently under public health surveillance for antimicrobial resistance include: Campylobacter, E. coli O157:H7, Gram negative and Gram positive organisms causing health care associated infections, group A Streptococcus, group B Streptococcus, Haemophilus influenzae, Helicobacter pylori, HIV, Influenza, Malaria, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis, Salmonella, Shigella, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus. Organisms are added to this list when resistance emerges as a public health problem, as tools are developed for detecting resistance, and when there is capacity at the appropriate level. On August 30, 2006, FDA cleared a new test for the detection of vancomycin resistant Enterococci (VRE) by detecting vanA and vanB genes using an automated real-time PCR Instrument. It is indicated for use for patients at risk for VRE colonization. • Results: Ongoing. See Executive Summary and Surveillance Data (to be released following public comment period, summer 2007). PROJECT: CDC ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES MEETING • Agency: CDC • Description: The CDC Office of Antimicrobial Resistance, in response to the recently held Antimicrobial Resistance Task Force consultants meeting, convened an internal AR surveillance meeting to explore ways for programs to strengthen and enhance their current surveillance efforts. By sharing successes and failures and exploring potential collaborations, we may be able to increase the impact and utility of our overall surveillance programs.
    [Show full text]