Race in Academia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

I, SOCIETY AI AND INEQUALITY: NEW DECADE, MORE CHALLENGES Mona Sloane, Ph.D. New York University [email protected] AI TECHNOLOGIES are becoming INTEGRAL to SOCIETY © DotEveryone SURVEILLANCE CAPITALISM TRADING in BEHAVIOURAL FUTURES © The Verge © The Innovation Scout TOTALIZING NARRATIVE of AI AI as a master technology = often either utopia or dystopia AI = human hubris? ”In 2014, the eminent scientists Stephen Hawking, Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark and Frank Wilczek wrote: ‘The potential benefits are huge; everything that civilisation has to offer is a product of human intelligence; we cannot predict what we might achieve when this intelligence is magnified by the tools that AI may provide, but the eradication of war, disease, and poverty would be high on anyone's list. Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history’.” Artificial General Intelligence? CORRELATION CAUSATION Race Race Gender Class INTERSECTIONAL INEQUALITY ETHICS EVERYWHERE EVERYWHERE EVERYWHERE EVERYWHERE EVERYWHERE EVERYWHERE EVERYWHERE ETHICS as POLICY APPROACH or as TECHNOLOGY APPROACH The ‘SOCIAL’ Problem ETHICS IS A SMOKESCREEN WHOSE HEAD – OR “INTELLIGENCE” – ARE TRYING TO MODEL, ANYWAY? THE FOUNDERS OF THE ”BIG 5 TECH COMPANIES”: AMAZON, FACEBOOK, ALPHABET, APPLE, MICROSOFT BIG TECH, BIG BUSINESS https://www.visualcapitalist.com/how-big-tech-makes-their-billions-2020/ 1956 DARTMOUTH CONFRENCE THE DIVERSITY ARGUMENT IS IMPORTANT. BUT IT IS INSUFFICIENT. EXTRACTION as a social super structure Prediction Dependency Extraction EXTRACTION Capitalism Racism White Supremacy Settler Colonialism Carcerality Heteronormativity … SCIENCE = ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ENGINE Real world consequences of classification systems: racial classification in apartheid South Africa Ruha Benjamin, Alondra Nelson, Charlton McIlwain, Meredith Broussard, Andre Brock, Safiya Noble, Mutale Nkonde, Rediet Abebe, Timnit Gebru, Joy Buolamwini, Jessie Daniels, Sasha Costanza- Chock, Marie Hicks, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, Laura Forlano, Danya Glabau, Kadija Ferryman, Vincent Southerland – and more. THANK YOU! [email protected] mona_sloane.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

ARCHITECTS of INTELLIGENCE for Xiaoxiao, Elaine, Colin, and Tristan ARCHITECTS of INTELLIGENCE
MARTIN FORD ARCHITECTS OF INTELLIGENCE For Xiaoxiao, Elaine, Colin, and Tristan ARCHITECTS OF INTELLIGENCE THE TRUTH ABOUT AI FROM THE PEOPLE BUILDING IT MARTIN FORD ARCHITECTS OF INTELLIGENCE Copyright © 2018 Packt Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embedded in critical articles or reviews. Every effort has been made in the preparation of this book to ensure the accuracy of the information presented. However, the information contained in this book is sold without warranty, either express or implied. Neither the author, nor Packt Publishing or its dealers and distributors, will be held liable for any damages caused or alleged to have been caused directly or indirectly by this book. Packt Publishing has endeavored to provide trademark information about all of the companies and products mentioned in this book by the appropriate use of capitals. However, Packt Publishing cannot guarantee the accuracy of this information. Acquisition Editors: Ben Renow-Clarke Project Editor: Radhika Atitkar Content Development Editor: Alex Sorrentino Proofreader: Safis Editing Presentation Designer: Sandip Tadge Cover Designer: Clare Bowyer Production Editor: Amit Ramadas Marketing Manager: Rajveer Samra Editorial Director: Dominic Shakeshaft First published: November 2018 Production reference: 2201118 Published by Packt Publishing Ltd. Livery Place 35 Livery Street Birmingham B3 2PB, UK ISBN 978-1-78913-151-2 www.packt.com Contents Introduction ........................................................................ 1 A Brief Introduction to the Vocabulary of Artificial Intelligence .......10 How AI Systems Learn ........................................................11 Yoshua Bengio .....................................................................17 Stuart J.
[Show full text]
The Time for a National Study on AI Is NOW
The Time For a National Study On AI is NOW Subscribe Past Issues Translate RSS View this email in your browser "I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I were to guess at what our biggest existential threat is, it’s probably that. With artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon." Elon Musk, CEO, Tesla Motors & SpaceX ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE STUDY: AI TODAY, AI TOMORROW We are following up on our last message about a proposed National Study on Artificial Intelligence. We very much appreciate the responses and encouragement we have received, and welcome input and questions from any League and/or its members on this subject. http://mailchi.mp/35a449e1979f/the-time-for-a-national-study-on-ai-is-now?e=[UNIQID][12/20/2017 6:29:08 PM] The Time For a National Study On AI is NOW We believe that the pace of development of AI and the implications of its advancement make this an extremely timely subject. AI is becoming an important part of our society - from medical uses to transportation to banking to national defense. Putting off this study will put us behind in the progress being made in AI. We again request that your League consider supporting this study at your program planning meeting. The reason to propose this study now is because there are currently no positions that address many of the issues that fall under the umbrella of this relatively new and powerful technology. For several years now private groups and even countries (like Russia, China and Korea) have made it a priority to develop mechanical brains/computers that can function intelligently http://mailchi.mp/35a449e1979f/the-time-for-a-national-study-on-ai-is-now?e=[UNIQID][12/20/2017 6:29:08 PM] The Time For a National Study On AI is NOW and command robots or other machines to perform some task.
[Show full text]
Arxiv:1202.4545V2 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 23 Aug 2012
The Relativity of Existence Stuart B. Heinrich [email protected] October 31, 2018 Abstract Despite the success of modern physics in formulating mathematical theories that can predict the outcome of experiments, we have made remarkably little progress towards answering the most fundamental question of: why is there a universe at all, as opposed to nothingness? In this paper, it is shown that this seemingly mind-boggling question has a simple logical answer if we accept that existence in the universe is nothing more than mathematical existence relative to the axioms of our universe. This premise is not baseless; it is shown here that there are indeed several independent strong logical arguments for why we should believe that mathematical existence is the only kind of existence. Moreover, it is shown that, under this premise, the answers to many other puzzling questions about our universe come almost immediately. Among these questions are: why is the universe apparently ﬁne-tuned to be able to support life? Why are the laws of physics so elegant? Why do we have three dimensions of space and one of time, with approximate locality and causality at macroscopic scales? How can the universe be non-local and non-causal at the quantum scale? How can the laws of quantum mechanics rely on true randomness? 1 Introduction can seem astonishing that anything exists” [73, p.24]. Most physicists and cosmologists are equally perplexed. Over the course of modern history, we have seen advances in Richard Dawkins has called it a “searching question that biology, chemistry, physics and cosmology that have painted rightly calls for an explanatory answer” [26, p.155], and Sam an ever-clearer picture of how we came to exist in this uni- Harris says that “any intellectually honest person will admit verse.
[Show full text]
Download Global Catastrophic Risks 2020
Global Catastrophic Risks 2020 Global Catastrophic Risks 2020 INTRODUCTION GLOBAL CHALLENGES FOUNDATION (GCF) ANNUAL REPORT: GCF & THOUGHT LEADERS SHARING WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ON GLOBAL CATASTROPHIC RISKS 2020 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors. Their statements are not necessarily endorsed by the affiliated organisations or the Global Challenges Foundation. ANNUAL REPORT TEAM Ulrika Westin, editor-in-chief Waldemar Ingdahl, researcher Victoria Wariaro, coordinator Weber Shandwick, creative director and graphic design. CONTRIBUTORS Kennette Benedict Senior Advisor, Bulletin of Atomic Scientists Angela Kane Senior Fellow, Vienna Centre for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation; visiting Professor, Sciences Po Paris; former High Representative for Disarmament Affairs at the United Nations Joana Castro Pereira Postdoctoral Researcher at Portuguese Institute of International Relations, NOVA University of Lisbon Philip Osano Research Fellow, Natural Resources and Ecosystems, Stockholm Environment Institute David Heymann Head and Senior Fellow, Centre on Global Health Security, Chatham House, Professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Romana Kofler, United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs Lindley Johnson, NASA Planetary Defense Officer and Program Executive of the Planetary Defense Coordination Office Gerhard Drolshagen, University of Oldenburg and the European Space Agency Stephen Sparks Professor, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol Ariel Conn Founder and
[Show full text]
Dissolving the Fermi Paradox), and Quite Likely Once We Account for the Fermi Observation
Dissolving the Fermi Paradox Anders Sandberg, Eric Drexler and Toby Ord Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University June 8, 2018 Abstract The Fermi paradox is the conflict between an expectation of a high ex ante probability of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe and the apparently lifeless universe we in fact observe. The expectation that the universe should be teeming with intelligent life is linked to models like the Drake equation, which suggest that even if the probability of intelligent life developing at a given site is small, the sheer multitude of possible sites should nonetheless yield a large number of potentially observable civilizations. We show that this conflict arises from the use of Drake-like equations, which implicitly assume certainty regarding highly uncertain parameters. We examine these parameters, incorporating models of chem- ical and genetic transitions on paths to the origin of life, and show that extant scientific knowledge corresponds to uncertainties that span multi- ple orders of magnitude. This makes a stark difference. When the model is recast to represent realistic distributions of uncertainty, we find a sub- stantial ex ante probability of there being no other intelligent life in our observable universe, and thus that there should be little surprise when we fail to detect any signs of it. This result dissolves the Fermi paradox, and in doing so removes any need to invoke speculative mechanisms by which civilizations would inevitably fail to have observable effects upon the universe. 1 Introduction While working at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in 1950, Enrico Fermi famously asked his colleagues: ”Where are they?” [1].
[Show full text]
A R E S E a R C H Agenda
Cooperation, Conflict, and Transformative Artificial Intelligence — A RESEARCH AGENDA Jesse Clifton — LONGTERMRISK.ORG March 2020 First draft: December 2019 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Cooperation failure: models and examples . .3 1.2 Outline of the agenda . .5 2 AI strategy and governance 8 2.1 Polarity and transition scenarios . .8 2.2 Commitment and transparency . .8 2.3 AI misalignment scenarios . 10 2.4 Other directions . 10 2.5 Potential downsides of research on cooperation failures . 11 3 Credibility 12 3.1 Commitment capabilities . 13 3.2 Open-source game theory . 13 4 Peaceful bargaining mechanisms 16 4.1 Rational crisis bargaining . 16 4.2 Surrogate goals . 18 5 Contemporary AI architectures 21 5.1 Learning to solve social dilemmas . 21 5.2 Multi-agent training . 24 5.3 Decision theory . 25 6 Humans in the loop 27 6.1 Behavioral game theory . 27 6.2 AI delegates . 28 7 Foundations of rational agency 30 7.1 Bounded decision theory . 30 7.2 Acausal reasoning . 31 8 Acknowledgements 35 1 1 Introduction Transformative artificial intelligence (TAI) may be a key factor in the long-run trajec- tory of civilization. A growing interdisciplinary community has begun to study how the development of TAI can be made safe and beneficial to sentient life (Bostrom, 2014; Russell et al., 2015; OpenAI, 2018; Ortega and Maini, 2018; Dafoe, 2018). We present a research agenda for advancing a critical component of this effort: preventing catastrophic failures of cooperation among TAI systems. By cooperation failures we refer to a broad class of potentially-catastrophic inefficiencies in interactions among TAI-enabled actors.
[Show full text]
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence A White Paper Jonathan Kirk, Co-Founder & Director of AI Strategy systemsGo www.systemsGo.asia January 2018 Table of Contents Big picture ..................................................................................................................... 4 What is AI anyway? ....................................................................................................... 5 Why now? What's changed? ........................................................................................ 5 Old algorithms, new life ................................................................................................ 6 Data - big and getting bigger ........................................................................................ 8 Some key data initiatives ......................................................................................................8 Computing power: continuing to explode .................................................................. 9 The state of AI today: better than some humans ....................................................... 9 AI to AGI ....................................................................................................................... 10 AI at work ..................................................................................................................... 12 Some examples of AI in use today - by industry...............................................................12 Emerging applications ........................................................................................................13
[Show full text]
Global Catastrophic Risks 2017 INTRODUCTION
Global Catastrophic Risks 2017 INTRODUCTION GLOBAL CHALLENGES ANNUAL REPORT: GCF & THOUGHT LEADERS SHARING WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ON GLOBAL CATASTROPHIC RISKS 2017 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors. Their statements are not necessarily endorsed by the affiliated organisations or the Global Challenges Foundation. ANNUAL REPORT TEAM Carin Ism, project leader Elinor Hägg, creative director Julien Leyre, editor in chief Kristina Thyrsson, graphic designer Ben Rhee, lead researcher Erik Johansson, graphic designer Waldemar Ingdahl, researcher Jesper Wallerborg, illustrator Elizabeth Ng, copywriter Dan Hoopert, illustrator CONTRIBUTORS Nobuyasu Abe Maria Ivanova Janos Pasztor Japanese Ambassador and Commissioner, Associate Professor of Global Governance Senior Fellow and Executive Director, C2G2 Japan Atomic Energy Commission; former UN and Director, Center for Governance and Initiative on Geoengineering, Carnegie Council Under-Secretary General for Disarmament Sustainability, University of Massachusetts Affairs Boston; Global Challenges Foundation Anders Sandberg Ambassador Senior Research Fellow, Future of Humanity Anthony Aguirre Institute Co-founder, Future of Life Institute Angela Kane Senior Fellow, Vienna Centre for Disarmament Tim Spahr Mats Andersson and Non-Proliferation; visiting Professor, CEO of NEO Sciences, LLC, former Director Vice chairman, Global Challenges Foundation Sciences Po Paris; former High Representative of the Minor Planetary Center, Harvard- for Disarmament Affairs at the United Nations Smithsonian
[Show full text]
Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence
Articles Research Priorities for Robust and Benefcial Artifcial Intelligence Stuart Russell, Daniel Dewey, Max Tegmark ■ Success in the quest for artifcial rtificial intelligence (AI) research has explored a variety intelligence has the potential to bring of problems and approaches since its inception, but for unprecedented benefts to humanity, Athe last 20 years or so has been focused on the prob- and it is therefore worthwhile to inves- lems surrounding the construction of intelligent agents — tigate how to maximize these benefts systems that perceive and act in some environment. In this while avoiding potential pitfalls. This article gives numerous examples (which context, the criterion for intelligence is related to statistical should by no means be construed as an and economic notions of rationality — colloquially, the abil- exhaustive list) of such worthwhile ity to make good decisions, plans, or inferences. The adop- research aimed at ensuring that AI tion of probabilistic representations and statistical learning remains robust and benefcial. methods has led to a large degree of integration and cross- fertilization between AI, machine learning, statistics, control theory, neuroscience, and other fields. The establishment of shared theoretical frameworks, combined with the availabil- ity of data and processing power, has yielded remarkable suc- cesses in various component tasks such as speech recogni- tion, image classification, autonomous vehicles, machine translation, legged locomotion, and question-answering sys- tems. Copyright
[Show full text]
Artificial Superintelligence and Its Limits: Why Alphazero Cannot Become a General Agent
Artificial superintelligence and its limits: why AlphaZero cannot become a general agent Abstract An intelligent machine surpassing human intelligence across a wide set of skills has been proposed as a possible existential catastrophe (i.e., an event comparable in value to that of human extinction). Among those concerned about existential risk related to Artificial Intelligence (AI), it is common to assume that AI will not only be very intelligent, but also be a general agent (i.e., an agent capable of action in many different contexts). This article explores the characteristics of machine agency, and what it would mean for a machine to become a general agent. In particular, it does so by articulating some important differences between belief and desire in the context of machine agency. One such difference is that while an agent can by itself acquire new beliefs through learning, desires need to be derived from preexisting desires or acquired with the help of an external influence. Such influence could be a human programmer or natural selection. We argue that to become a general agent, a machine needs productive desires, or desires that can direct behavior across multiple contexts. However, productive desires cannot sui generis be derived from non-productive desires. Thus, even though general agency in AI could in principle be created, it cannot be produced by an AI spontaneously through an endogenous process. In conclusion, we argue that a common AI scenario, where general agency suddenly emerges in a non-general agent AI, is not plausible. 1. The Intelligence explosion A number of scholars, most prominently Alan Turing (1950) have argued that humanity will eventually create an Artificial Intelligence (AI) with greater intelligence than that of any human.
[Show full text]
Intelligence Unleashed an Argument for AI in Education
Intelligence Unleashed An argument for AI in Education Rose Luckin Wayne Holmes UCL Knowledge Lab, University College London Mark Griffiths Laurie B. Forcier Pearson Open Ideas at Pearson Sharing independent insights on the big, unanswered questions in education ABOUT Open Ideas at Pearson Pearson’s goal is to help people make progress in their lives through learning. This means we are always learning too. This series of publications, Open Ideas, is one of the ways in which we do this. We work with some of the best minds in education – from teachers and technologists, to researchers and big thinkers – to bring their independent ideas and insights to a wider audience. How do we learn, and what keeps us motivated to do so? What is the body of knowledge and skills that learners need as we move into the second half of the 21st century? How can smart digital technologies be best deployed to realise the goal of a more personalised education? How can we build education systems that provide high quality learning opportunities to all? These questions are too important for the best ideas to stay only in the lecture theatre, on the bookshelf, or alone in one classroom. Instead they need to be found and supported, shared and debated, adopted and refined. Our hope is that Open Ideas helps with this task, and that you will join the conversation. OPEN IDEAS AT PEARSON Pearson UCL Knowledge Lab Pearson is the world’s learning The UCL Knowledge Lab (previously company, with expertise in known as the London Knowledge educational courseware and Lab) is an interdisciplinary research assessment, and a range of centre at the UCL Institute of teaching and learning services Education, University College London.
[Show full text]
Life 3.0 Max Tegmark Book Review (Wyatt) - .Docx © 2020 John Wyatt Page 1 of 3 Life 3.0 Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Life 3.0 Being human in the age of Artificial Intelligence “Life 3.0 Being human in the age of Artificial Intelligence” by Max Tegmark, 2018 ISBN: 978 0 141981802 Tegmark is a MIT physicist who was one of the founders of the Future of Life Institute (10), dedicated to the study of risks to the future existence of humanity from multiple threats, including super-intelligent AI. As their website proclaims “Technology is giving life the potential to flourish like never before – or to self destruct” Tegmark is firmly within the stream of many modern thinkers who conceive of life in purely mechanistic terms. His definition if life is as “a process that can retain its complexity and replicate. It’s a self-replicating information-processing system whose information determines its behaviour (software) and the blueprints for its hardware.” (11) Life 1.0 is simple and biological: it is “unable to redesign either its hardware or its software during its lifetime.” Life 2.0 is human and biological: it can “redesign much of its software (through culture), but not its hardware;” Life 3.0, which doesn’t yet exist on earth although it is nearly here, is non-human and post-biological or technological: it can “dramatically redesign not only its software but its hardware as well.” (12) Tegmark argues that in the evolution of humanity “our Universe has awoken and become aware of itself.….Before our Universe awoke there was no beauty…. This makes our cosmic awakening all the more wonderful and worthy of celebrating: it transformed our Universe from a mindless zombie with no self-awareness into a living ecosystem harbouring self-reflection, beauty and hope – and the pursuit of goals, meaning and purpose”.
[Show full text]