DOCSLIB.ORG

Massachusetts Guide to Evidence Mark S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massachusetts Guide to Evidence Mark S Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 1-1-2008 Massachusetts Guide to Evidence Mark S. Brodin Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Evidence Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark S. Brodin. "Massachusetts uideG to Evidence." (2008). This Book is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MASSACHUSETTS GUIDE TO EVIDENCE 2011 Edition SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MASSACHUSETTS EVIDENCE LAW SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT The Supreme Judicial Court recommends the use of the Massa- chusetts Guide to Evidence. Our recommendation of the Massachu- setts Guide to Evidence is not to be interpreted as an adoption of a set of rules of evidence, nor a predictive guide to the development of the common law of evidence. The purpose of the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence is to make the law of evidence more accessible and under- standable to the bench, bar, and public. We encourage all interested persons to use the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence. Chief Justice Roderick L. Ireland Justice Francis X. Spina Justice Judith A. Cowin Justice Robert J. Cordy Justice Margot Botsford Justice Ralph D. Gants Justice Fernande R.V. Duffly February 2011 INTRODUCTION In June 2006, the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, at the request of the Massachusetts Bar Association, the Boston Bar Associa- tion, and the Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys, created the Supreme Judicial Court Advisory Committee on Massachusetts Evi- dence Law to prepare a Guide to the Massachusetts law of evidence. The Justices charged the Committee with the mandate “to assemble the current law in one easily usable document, along the lines of the Fed- eral Rules of Evidence, rather than to prepare a Restatement or to pro- pose changes in the existing law of evidence.” As Chief Justice Marga- ret H. Marshall stated in her March 2006 address to the Massachusetts Bar Association, “[t]he Advisory Committee will compile a Guide to Massachusetts evidence law as it currently exists, replete with case law and reporters’ notes. The Guide will make our rules of evidence more accessible to bench, bar, and the public. It will improve the under- standing, teaching, and presentation of Massachusetts evidence. It will advance the delivery of justice.” The Massachusetts Guide to Evidence organizes and states the law of evidence applied in proceedings in the courts of the Common- wealth, as set forth in the Federal and State Constitutions, General Laws, common law, and rules of court. The Committee invites com- ments and suggestions on the Guide. The Guide is organized into “Sections” using the format of the Federal Rules of Evidence insofar as the Federal rules comport with Massachusetts law and practice. Some sections are different from the Federal rules. For instance, Article V of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which governs the law of privileges, contains one general section whereas the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence contains twenty-five sections detailing evidentiary privileges and disqualifications recog- nized in Massachusetts. Other sections, such as Section 1102, Spolia- tion or Destruction of Evidence, Section 1103, Sexually Dangerous Person Proceedings, and Section 1104, Witness Cooperation Agree- ments, have no counterpart in the Federal rules. Each section contains a statement of the law of Massachusetts, current through December 31, 2010, and an accompanying “Note” that includes supporting authority. Some sections are based upon a single statute or decision, while other sections were derived from multiple sources. Certain sections were drafted “nearly verbatim” from a source with minimal changes, for instance, revised punctuation, gender- neutral terms, or minor reorganization, to allow the language to be stated more accurately in the context of the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence. For the practitioner’s easy reference, the Committee has in- cluded parallel citations to the North Eastern Reporter. Many sections of the Guide use the language of the Proposed Massachusetts Rules of Evidence (1980) or the Federal Rules of Evi- dence. The Committee concluded that such language is preferred when it represents an accurate statement of current Massachusetts law. The Committee wishes to emphasize two points. First and foremost, in ac- cordance with its mandate from the Supreme Judicial Court, what the Committee has written are not rules, but rather, as the title suggests, a guide to evidence based on the law as it exists today. The Committee did not attempt, nor is it authorized, to suggest modifications, adopt new rules, or predict future developments in the law. Second, the Committee has recommended to the Supreme Judicial Court that the Guide be published annually to address changes in the law and to make any other revisions as necessary. The Committee’s goal is to re- flect the most accurate and clear statement of current law as possible. Ultimately, the law of evidence in Massachusetts is what is contained in the authoritative decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court and of the Appeals Court, and the statutes duly enacted by the Legislature. Supreme Judicial Court Advisory Committee on Massachusetts Evidence Law Supreme Judicial Court Advisory Committee on Massachusetts Evidence Law Executive Committee Honorable R. Marc Kantrowitz, Appeals Court, Editor-in-Chief Honorable Peter W. Agnes, Jr., Superior Court, Editor Honorable David A. Lowy, Superior Court, Editor Joseph F. Stanton, Esq., Appeals Court, Reporter Barbara Berenson, Esq., Supreme Judicial Court Honorable Mark S. Coven, District Court Professor Philip K. Hamilton, New England School of Law Elizabeth N. Mulvey, Esq., Crowe & Mulvey, LLP Lydia Edwards, Esq., Appeals Court Sean M. Toohey, Esq., Appeals Court Education Committee Honorable Edward Donnelly, Probate and Family Court Honorable Mark Coven, District Court Honorable Daniel Swords, Juvenile Court Honorable Raymond Dougan, Boston Municipal Court Honorable Frey Winik, Housing Court Honorable Judith Fabricant, Superior Court Research Assistants Steven Winer, Esq., Ben Snitkoff, Esq., and Sheila F. Lawn, Esq. Student Interns Melaney Hodge, Michelle McCarthy, Marina Sigal, and Gina Plata- Nino Acknowledgments The Executive Committee acknowledges the leadership and enthusias- tic support of Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall, who prior to her re- tirement in 2010 oversaw the Supreme Judicial Court’s creation of its Advisory Committee on Massachusetts Evidence Law and was instru- mental in the Committee’s publication of the 2008–2009, 2010, and 2011 editions. The Executive Committee also acknowledges the strong support of Justice John M. Greaney, who retired in 2008. The Executive Committee thanks the following persons who partici- pated in the development and publication of the 2010 edition of the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence: Allison Carrinski, Esq., Executive Committee Julie Brennan, Esq., Research Assistant Blair Edwards, David Mawhinny, and Meghan Waters, Student Interns The Executive Committee thanks the following persons who partici- pated in the development and publication of the 2008–2009 edition of the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence: Members of the Supreme Judicial Court Advisory Committee on Massachusetts Evidence Law Professor Michael Avery, Suffolk University Law School Professor Mark Brodin, Boston College Law School Honorable James W. Coffey, Boston Municipal Court Kevin Connelly, Esq. Honorable Patricia G. Curtin, Dedham District Court, Acting Presiding Justice Honorable Michael F. Edgerton, Essex County Juvenile Court Assistant Attorney General Steven L. Hoffman, Business and Labor Protection Bureau Timothy E. Maguire, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, LLP Tracy A. Miner, Esq., Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C. Dorian Morello, Esq. Elizabeth N. Mulvey, Esq., Crowe & Mulvey, LLP Martin F. Murphy, Esq., Foley Hoag LLP Honorable Geoffrey G. Packard, Malden District Court Ian Pinta, Esq., Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman & Guekguezian LLP Katherine A. Robertson, Esq., Bulkley, Richardson & Gelinas Honorable Catherine P. Sabaitis, First Justice, Plymouth County Probate and Family Court External Editors Charles M. Burnim, Professor Emeritus, Suffolk University Law School Dean John Fenton, Suffolk University Law School Professor Philip K. Hamilton, New England School of Law Nelson P. Lovins, Esq., Lovins & Metcalf John R. Pollets, Esq., Law Office of John R. Pollets Christopher Poreda, Esq. Honorable William Young, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Assistant Editors Mary Bowe, Appeals Court Tina LaFranchi, Appeals Court Shelley Ruff Robert L. Stetson Cite-Checkers Appeals Court Staff Attorneys Dan Thurler, Katherine Crockford, Ellen Epstein, Jane Hong, Ann Jones, Denise Kenneally, Lynn Muster, Linda Ruggiero, Martha Simmons, Margo Stark, and Emily Tobin Appeals Court Law Clerks Drew Devoogd, Justin Dibiasio, Kursten Doherty, Rebecca Fordon, Rebecca Greber, Max Grinberg, Jamie Hoag, Dana Keenholtz, Margaret Kwoka, Nicole Liguori, Doug Martland, Dorian Morello, Carla Sauvignon, Matt Schrumpf, Steve Sharobem, David Slocum, Adrienne Smith, Tim Landry, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management and Land Disturbance Section of the City of Quincy Municipal Code Is Hereby
    INTRODUCED BY: MAYOR THOMAS P. KOCH CITY OF QUINCY IN COUNCIL ORDER NO. 2021- 054 ORDERED: May 17, 2021 Upon recommendation of the Commissioner of Public Works, and with the approval of his Honor, the Mayor, the Chapter 300 Stormwater Management, Article II - Stormwater Management and Land Disturbance section of the City of Quincy Municipal Code is hereby amended by striking it in its entirety and inserting the attached provisions for: Chapter 300 Stormwater Management Article II Stormwater Management and Land Disturbance 300- 15. Findings and objectives. A. The harmful impacts of polluted and unmanaged stormwater runoff are known to cause: 1) Impairment of water quality and flow in lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, wetlands, and groundwater; 2) Contamination of drinking water supplies; 3) Erosion of stream channels; 4) Alteration or destruction of aquatic and wildlife habitat; 5) Flooding; and 6) Overloading or dogging of municipal storm drain systems. B. The objectives of this article are to: 1) Protect groundwater and surface water from degradation; 2) Require practices that reduce soil erosion and sedimentation and control the volume and rate of stormwater runoff resulting from development, construction, and land surface alteration; 3) Promote infiltration and the recharge of groundwater; 4) Prevent pollutants from entering the City of Quincy municipal separate storm sewer system ( MS4) and to minimize discharge of pollutants from the MS4; 5) Ensure adequate, long-term operation and maintenance of structural stormwater best management practices; 6) Ensure that soil erosion and sedimentation control measures and stormwater runoff control practices that are incorporated into the site planning and design processes are implemented and maintained; ORDER NO.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 ANNUAL TOWN REPORT Bedford, Massachusetts
    2012 ANNUAL TOWN REPORT Bedford, Massachusetts Town Organization Chart 3 Town Directory 4 Our Town 5 Town Administration 6 PART I REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, DEPARTMENTS, & BOARDS Arbor Resource Committee 10 Bedford Housing Authority 11 Bedford Housing Partnership 13 Bicycle Advisory Committee 17 Board of Health 18 Board of Registrars of Voters 21 Cable Television Committee 23 Code Enforcement Department 25 Community Preservation Committee 27 Conservation Commission 28 Council on Aging 31 Department of Public Works 33 Depot Park Advisory Committee 37 Facilities Department 38 Fire Department 40 Historic District Commission 42 Historic Preservation Commission 43 Land Acquisition Committee 45 Patriotic Holiday Committee 46 Planning Board 47 Police Department 51 Public Library 55 Recreation Department 60 Selectmen 62 Town Center/Old Town Hall 64 Town Clerk 67 Town Historian 68 Volunteer Coordinating Committee 69 Youth & Family Services 70 Zoning Board of Appeals 75 2012 ANNUAL TOWN REPORT Bedford, Massachusetts PART II SCHOOLS Bedford Public Schools 77 Shawsheen Valley Regional Vocational/Technical School District 80 PART III ELECTIONS & TOWN MEETINGS Special Town Meeting November 7, 2011 86 2012 Town Caucus January 10, 2012 89 Presidential Primary Results March 10, 2012 92 Annual Town Election March 10, 2012 94 Annual Town Meeting March 26, 2012 95 Annual Town Meeting March 27, 2012 (Continued) 100 Annual Town Meeting April 2, 2012 (Continued) 114 PART IV FINANCE Board of Assessors 126 Finance Department 127 Collections 130 2011 Financial Report 131 Volunteer Opportunities and Questionnaire 155 Cover designed by Bedford resident Jean Hammond. Photograph of New Wilson Mill Dam by Town Engineer Adrienne St. John Painting of the Old Wilson Mill Dam by Edwin Graves Champney (c.1880s) courtesy of Bea Brown and the Bedford Historical Society 2012 Annual Report 3 www.bedfordma.gov 2012 Annual Report 4 www.bedfordma.gov TOWN OF BEDFORD DIRECTORY TOWN DEPARTMENTS & SERVICES Bedford Cable Access TV………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Operation of the Briggs Law of Massachusetts
    THE HISTORY AND OPERATION OF THE BRIGGS LAW OF MASSACHUSETTS WINFRED OVERHO.SE* The problem of the mental capacity of persons accused of crime is one which has for several centuries been of considerable interest to the courts. Apparently prior to the middle of the eighteenth century, however, no great difficulty was experienced by the court in obtaining reliable evidence on this question-since at that time the experts were called in by the court as amici curiae. During the past two hundred years, however, the position of the experts has tended to develop into that of par- tisans,' and criticism has been widespread and caustic on the part not only of judges and lawyers but of the general public.2 By reason of the sensational nature of the crime charged in some cases where insanity is pleaded as a defense, undue attention has been focused by the public upon the r~le of the psychiatrist as an expert witness in criminal trials, despite the well recognized abuses of other types of expert testi- mony, criminal and civil alike. If criticism has been rampant, however, it cannot truthfully be said that no attempts have been made to improve the situation. Some of these attempts have partaken of the nature of action by professional societies, but the ones which concern us particularly are those which have been enacted into legislation. Of the types of legislative cures proposed, the most common has been that con- ferring upon the court the right or the duty, in certain specified cases, of appointing neutral experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass.) (Appellate Brief) Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    COMMONWEALTH, v. LIFE CARE CENTERS OF..., 2010 WL 3612917... 2010 WL 3612917 (Mass.) (Appellate Brief) Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. COMMONWEALTH, v. LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. No. SJC-10546. February 23, 2010. Appellant Life Care Centers of America, Inc.'s Reply Brief on Report of Questions of Law Pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 34 By Counsel for the Defendant, Don Howarth (pro hav vice), Suzelle M. Smith (pro hac vice), Howarth & Smith, 523 West Sixth Street, Suite 728, Los Angeles, CA 90014, (213) 955-9400, R. Matthew Rickman (BBO # 637160), Alathea E. Porter (BBO # 661100), LibbyHoopes, P.C., 175 Federal Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02110, (617) 338-9300. *i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CASES AND AUTHORITIES ................................................................................................... ii I. Proper Application of the Doctrine of Respondeat Superior to a Criminal Case Is Not in Dispute ............ 1 A. Beneficial Finance Holds that Only if the Commonwealth Proves individual Employees Committed a 6 Crime Can the Corporate Employer Be Liable .............................................................................................. B. Merely Negligent Acts May not be Aggregated to Create a Crime ........................................................... 11 II. Proof Of Bad Purpose Is Required Under § 38 ......................................................................................... 13 III. Fairness Requires Prospective Application If The Court Adopts The Proposed Aggregation Doctrine
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTED to JUSTICE
    COMMITTED to JUSTICE 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OUR MISSION Greater Boston Legal Services’ (GBLS’) Now more than ever. mission is to provide free civil legal aid Greater Boston Legal Services is committed to justice, is doing to help individuals and families achieve justice and making a difference now more than ever. Our expert attorneys and paralegals provide their clients with peace of mind, justice and meet their basic needs, help ensure they have a roof over their heads and food on their tables, secure owed wages and lawful immigration status, and preserve safety, such as food, security, safety, and independence, and dignity. Last year we handled over 12,000 legal matters for more than 10,000 people who could not have otherwise adequate shelter. GBLS helps afforded a lawyer when they needed one the most – when their civil vulnerable individuals and families rights were threatened or their basic needs were unmet. retain affordable housing, gain Now more than ever, our help is critical for marginalized and cash- poor individuals and families in our community. As income inequality protection from domestic violence, and racial injustice surge in our country, we must look to the rule of law to confront these deep-seated issues through policy change and obtain subsistence income for food systemic advocacy. And, as we find the social safety net for vulnerable and necessities, access health care, populations increasingly under attack, we will be here – as we have been for 117 years – fighting to protect the needs of our clients and seek immigration relief, and recover securing justice in our community.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeasternnortheastern University School of Law Magazine | Northeastern.Edu/Law Law
    winter 2018 NortheasternNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW MAGAZINE | northeastern.edu/law Law One in a Hundred The odds aren’t in her favor, but it’s still worth betting on Senator Maggie Hassan ’85. Winter 2018 Donald Cabell ’91 is a munificent mentor in the law school’s co-op program. 16 Photograph by Kathleen Dooher An EPIC co-op for Siri Nelson ’19 FEATURES 12 One in a Hundred The odds aren’t in her favor, but it’s still worth betting on Senator Maggie Hassan ’85. By Jeri Zeder 16 Mentors Raise the Bar Co-op supervisors play a critical role in transforming Northeastern law students into lawyers. By Andrew Faught 10 10 DENNIS DRENNER 20 Security Sold Separately Who should bear the burden to protect your personal information from today’s omnipotent 2 Dean’s Message hackers? By Elaine McArdle The Measure of Success 3 News Briefs Justice Nan Duffly, Rosenbloom and Albright, 30 Bar Exam Success ... Fall 2017 lectures and conferences 8 10 Co-op Matters Washington, DC — Siri Nelson ’19 San Diego — Andrew Hart ’18 Washington, DC — Anna Maria Annino ’19 25 Faculty News Sessa and Social Justice, Celebrating Meltsner, Fulbrights for Davis and Woo Talking the Talk 29 30 On the House The Accidental Advocate MONTSERRAT P E 32 Class Actions P Profile: Saraa Basaria ’12 Paving the Way 32 Class Notes 33 In Memoriam 34 29 Profile: Vivienne Simon ’77 Sweet Disobedience 35 MICHAEL MANNING Alumni/ae Weekend 38 Alissa Brill ’15 wasn’t looking to become a 40 Adjourn public interest lawyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Profit Bylaws of Berkshire County Historical Society, Inc
    1 NON-PROFIT BYLAWS OF BERKSHIRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC. PREAMBLE The following Bylaws shall be subject to, and governed by, the Non-Profit Corporation Act of Massachusetts and the Articles of Incorporation of Berkshire County Historical Society, Inc. In the event of a direct conflict between the herein contained provisions of these Bylaws and the mandatory provisions of the Non-Profit Corporation Act of Massachusetts, said Non-Profit Corporation Act shall be the prevailing controlling law. In the event of a direct conflict between the provisions of these Bylaws and the Articles of Incorporation of theHistorical Society, it shall then be these Bylaws which shall be controlling.See:The Articles of incorporation of the Berkshire County Historical Society, Inc. ARTICLE 1 – NAME The legal name of the Non-Profit Corporation/Organization shall be known as Berkshire County Historical Society, Inc., and shall herein be referred to as the "Historical Society." ARTICLE 2 – PURPOSE The general purposes for which this Historical Society has been established are as follows: The Historical Society is established within the meaning of IRS Publication 557 Section 501(c) (3) Organization of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code and shall be operated to collect, preserve and disseminate the history of Berkshire County, Massachusetts, and to utilize its collections for research, education, exhibit, and to loan its collections as appropriate. Furthermore, the society is committed to the preservation and interpretation of Arrowhead, the home of author Herman Melville, as a registered National Historic Landmark and museum.
    [Show full text]
  • To Have and Have Not -- Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, and the Public Trust Doctrine: Remembering the Land That Time Forgot Christopher Coli Mcmahon
    Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review Volume 31 Issue 2 Coastal Wind Power Energy Generation: Article 10 Capacities and Conflict 1-1-2004 To Have and Have Not -- Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, and the Public Trust Doctrine: Remembering the Land that Time Forgot Christopher Coli McMahon Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr Part of the Common Law Commons, and the Land Use Law Commons Recommended Citation Christopher C. McMahon, To Have and Have Not -- Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, and the Public Trust Doctrine: Remembering the Land that Time Forgot, 31 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 431 (2004), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr/vol31/iss2/10 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TO HAVE AND HAVE NOT-NANTUCKET, MARTHA'S VINEYARD, AND TIlE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE: REMEMBERING TIlE LAND TIlAT TIME FORGOT CHRISTOPHER COLI McMAHON* Abstract: The Public Trust Doctrine, an ancient mandate under which the sovereign holds unique natural resources in trust for the benefit of the general public, has been adopted by the United States as a staple of American property law. While the federal government is the ultimate trustee of these lands, the states may flexibly interpret and administer this law to maximize the public benefit derived from trust resources. For instance, although most states own the land between the high and low tide lines in trust for its citizens, Massachusetts bases its common law interpretation of the Doctrine on the Colonial Ordinance of 1641-41, a statute passed by the early settlers of the commonwealth providing for private ownership of the ocean flats.
    [Show full text]
  • Council and Participants
    The American Law Institute OFFICERSt Roberta Cooper Ramo, President Allen D. Black, 1st Vice President Douglas Laycock, 2nd Vice President Carolyn Dineen King, Treasurer Susan Frelich Appleton, Secretary Lance Liebman, Director Stephanie A. Middleton, Deputy Director COUNCILt Kenneth S. Abraham Charlottesville Virginia Shirley S. Abrahamson Madison Wisconsin Susan Frelich Appleton St. Louis Missouri Kim J. Askew Dallas Texas Jos6 I. Astigarraga Miami Florida John H. Beisner Washington District of Columbia Sheila L. Birnbaum New York New York Allen D. Black Philadelphia Pennsylvania Amelia H. Boss Philadelphia Pennsylvania William M. Burke Costa Mesa California Elizabeth J. Cabraser San Francisco California Edward H. Cooper Ann Arbor Michigan N. Lee Cooper Birmingham Alabama Mary B. Cranston San Francisco California George H.T. Dudley St. Thomas U.S. Virgin Islands Christine M. Durham Salt Lake City Utah Kenneth C. Frazier Whitehouse Station New Jersey Paul L. Friedman Washington District of Columbia Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Oakland California Anton G. Haijar Washington District of Columbia Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr.* San Francisco California D. Brock Hornby Portland Maine William C. Hubbard Columbia South Carolina Wallace B. Jefferson Austin Texas Mary Kay Kane San Francisco California Herma Hill Kay Berkeley California Carolyn Dineen King Houston Texas Carolyn B. Lamm Washington District of Columbia Derek P. Langhauser South Portland Maine Douglas Laycock Charlottesville Virginia David F. Levi Durham North Carolina Martin Lipton New York New York Gerard E. Lynch New York New York Margaret H. Marshall Cambridge Massachusetts M. Margaret McKeown San Diego California John J. McKetta, III Austin Texas Daniel J. Meltzer Cambridge Massachusetts t As of June 6, 2011 * DirectorEmeritus COUNCIL Judith A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Manual for the Constitutional Convention, 1917
    .- .-'A (iPotneU Hlnioeiraitg Sibracg 3tl)aca, Siein fnrb THE GIFT OF (l>Dr\\fe.viti*Ti. ' ^HE accompanying J>ublication is sent witk • tke I oom{>limcnts of tke Constitutional Convention of Massachusetts. Acknowledgment of its receij>t may he made to the State Liorarian, State Mouse, Boston. ,,.„^_ Cornell University Library JK3125 1917 .A4 19lV A manual for the Constitutional ConventI 3 1924 030 489 573 olin Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030489573 <^^7t -i^j/ztii^c^ iu^-^^'^ ^J^.rL^ , ^^.....^ /^ 1^9^ ^e.^ ^ : ^^ \: (/^a^^>, r^/^^/ ^/ A :^».urM^^rM^^:jt^^^4^^>^^^ ^?-rrJti^<a^ /oj^„^ ,':'<- '. "^^y ' j^^^S^u^ ^(C.X) aJ-^-^„.^^ ^5^. ^ jr^^ <^^.^^ '^^^K /n-^/^ vu^ M ^ii^ (HammoxmmlXli of Mmsisx\in0itt& A MANUAL FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION 1917 SUBMITTED TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION BY THE COMMISSION TO COMPILE INFORMATION AND DATA FOR THE USE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION SECOND EDITION BOSTON WRIGHT & POTTER PRINTING COMPANY. STATE PRINTERS 32 DERNE STREET 1917 CONTENTS j^ PAGE History of the Constitution of Massachusetts, 5 I. The Govem6r and Company of the Massachusetts Bay (Colony Charter), 1629-1686, 5 II. Inter-Charter Period, 1686-1692, 9 III. The Province of the Massachusetts Bay (Province Char- ter), 1692-1774, . ... 9 IV. Colony and State of Massachusetts Bay (Provincial Con- gress and Province Charter resumed), 1774r-1780, . 12 V. The Movement for a State Constitution, 1776-1780, 14 1. Preliminaries, 14 2. Constitution of 1778, and the Essex Result, 16 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Is Elementary at New Saugus Playground
    WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2016 Taco Bell has a bad ring to it for Lynn neighbors By Thomas Grillo and Stetson streets. “We are totally opposed to an all-night Gertrude Sally Chapman, another Sta- ITEM STAFF More than a dozen residents of the operation,” she said. dium resident, said she wants a guaran- 162-unit Stadium Condominiums on Lo- Michele Wilkins, a condo resident, said tee that the lights from the eatery and LYNN — City councilors Tuesday night cust Street behind the plaza packed the she has complained about the temporary the cars going through the drive-through rejected a 24-hour Taco Bell proposed for the Lynngate Shopping Plaza. hearing room on Tuesday night. They fence with cement blocks on the sidewalk will not shine on their homes. Instead, the Licensing Committee argued that late night hours will exacer- around the construction site that has “We are abutters to this property and approved a closing time of 1 a.m., sim- bate traf c and trash problems on Bos- caused pedestrian accidents, but has not we have not been told anything and ilar to other fast food shops in the city. ton Street and disturb the neighborhood received a call back from Taco Bell. have been left in the dark with nothing The city’s action clears the way for the at all hours. “Given the lack of response, I don’t in writing,” she said. “Hopefully you will 2,500-square-foot restaurant that is un- Patricia Dutch, a Stadium resident, know what kind of a good neighbor they listen to us.” der construction on a portion of the park- said she is worried about the restaurant’s would be,” she said.
    [Show full text]
  • Codification of the Law in Colonial Massachusetts: a Study in Comparative Law
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 30 Issue 1 Article 1 Fall 1954 Codification of the Law in Colonial Massachusetts: A Study in Comparative Law George L. Haskins University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Haskins, George L. (1954) "Codification of the Law in Colonial Massachusetts: A Study in Comparative Law," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 30 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol30/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDIANA LAW JOURNAL Volume 30 FALL 1954 Number I CODIFICATION OF THE LAW IN COLONIAL MASSACHU- SETTS: A STUDY IN COMPARATIVE LAWt GEORGE L. HASKINSt Since at least the time of Aristotle, students of political institutions have been aware that the legal systems of widely differing societies and cultures have many common traits and features. This phenomenon has, in recent times, attracted the attention of jurists and legal historians, who have made fruitful comparisons of the law and institutions of various countries and civilizations, and their studies have made more precise our understanding of the common features of different legal systems. It is beginning to be recognized in many quarters that these similarities are the outgrowth or consequence of certain underlying and recurring pat- terns in legal development, and it has become a special function of what we call comparative jurisprudence to investigate these general patterns with a view to describing their characteristics and, more particularly, their influence at particular stages of legal growth.
    [Show full text]