DOCSLIB.ORG

Advanced 3Y-TZP Bioceramic Doped with Al2o3 and Ceo2 Potentially for Biomedical Implant Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advanced 3Y-TZP Bioceramic Doped with Al2o3 and Ceo2 Potentially for Biomedical Implant Applications Materials Technology Advanced Performance Materials ISSN: 1066-7857 (Print) 1753-5557 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ymte20 Advanced 3Y-TZP bioceramic doped with Al2O3 and CeO2 potentially for biomedical implant applications Mohsen Golieskardi, Meenaloshini Satgunam, Dinesh Ragurajan, Md Enamul Hoque, Angela Min Hwei Ng & Lohashenpahan Shanmuganantha To cite this article: Mohsen Golieskardi, Meenaloshini Satgunam, Dinesh Ragurajan, Md Enamul Hoque, Angela Min Hwei Ng & Lohashenpahan Shanmuganantha (2019): Advanced 3Y-TZP bioceramic doped with Al2O3 and CeO2 potentially for biomedical implant applications, Materials Technology To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2019.1578912 Published online: 20 Feb 2019. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ymte20 MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2019.1578912 Advanced 3Y-TZP bioceramic doped with Al2O3 and CeO2 potentially for biomedical implant applications Mohsen Golieskardia, Meenaloshini Satgunama, Dinesh Ragurajan a, Md Enamul Hoqueb, Angela Min Hwei Ngc and Lohashenpahan Shanmugananthac aDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang, Malaysia; bDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka, Bangladesh; cTissue Engineering Center, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This research studies 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP) investigating the effects of Al2O3 Received 3 October 2018 Accepted 21 January 2019 and CeO2 dopants on the stability of tetragonal phase and the microstructure of 3Y-TZP determined over the operating temperature ranging from 1250°C to 1550°C. It is found that KEYWORDS the mechanical properties of 3Y-TZP are dependent on the sintering temperature and the dopant Bioceramic; 3Y-TZP; cell amount. The current study reveals that the optimum sintering temperature is 1450°C for all 3Y- morphology; cell 3 TZP samples while attaining more than 98% of the theoretical density (6.1g/cm ). With optimum proliferation; cytotoxicity; dopants, the 3Y-TZP ceramic samples demonstrate the Vickers hardness of 10.9 GPa and fracture mechanical properties 1/2 toughness (KIC)of10MPa.m . Fracture toughness increases with the dopant content, indicating that the annihilation of oxygen vacancies in 3Y-TZP is responsible for the instability of the t-ZrO2 lattice. To investigate the biocompatibility of 3Y-TZP, cell culture study was performed using osteoblast cells. The results demonstrate a high percentage of cell attachment and proliferation that confirmed the biocompatibility of synthesized 3Y-TZP. Introduction size ~0.5 μm) from Y-TZP powders. The fracture toughness, hardness and fracture strength of 3Y-TZP Biomaterials are implanted in human bodies to replace are 4–8 MPa.m1/2,10–12 GPa and 900–1200 MPa, damaged/diseased tissues. As for the developments in respectively [9], which are relatively high as compared implantology field, many materials have been invented to those of other bioceramics [10]. The superior fracture to improve prostheses quality applied for either fixing toughness exhibited by Y-TZP ceramics are due to the or replacing the body tissues. Since most of the bioma- transformation toughening mechanism, which involves terials used for this purpose are ceramics, metals and spontaneous phase transformation from tetragonal (t) polymers, spectacular improvements have occurred in to monoclinic (m) zirconia occurring as a crack propa- many cases such as bone reconstruction, and replacing gates through the material, a mechanism known as joints or teeth. The overall innovations on both surface transformation toughening [11]. properties and bulk modifications in this regards are However, one of the major limitations of Y-TZP enormous. When prosthesis is placed within the body, ceramics as engineering materials is the undesirable it interacts with the living organs. Therefore, it is impor- surface-initiated phase transformation from the (t) to tant that the material should be biocompatible, e.g. (m) symmetry accompanied by property degradation a successful implant provides enough material tolerance during exposure in humid atmosphere (water and to support a higher biocompatibility grade. steam) at temperatures ranging from 20°C to 500°C. A biomaterial can be produced from various sources Besides, ceramic can undergo a slow, tetragonal to such as metal, polymer or ceramic, depending on its monoclinic phase transformation at the samples surface functionality [1–5]. There are advantages and limita- in a humid atmosphere followed by microcracking and tions associated with each material category. For exam- a serious loss in strength, a phenomenon subsequently ple, ceramic is well-known for its biocompatibility. known as ageing or low-temperature degradation However, it is frequently characterized by its high hard- (LTD) [12–14]. ness and low resistance to fracture. On the other hand, To overcome LTD in Y-TZP, inclusion of sintering bioceramics such as 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia additivessuchasTiO,SiO,AlO ,MgO,CeO, etc. (3Y-TZP), porcelain are often used in dental applica- 2 2 2 3 2 have been investigated by many researchers since this is tions due to their biocompatibility and promising the most effective and simplest way to achieve a dense mechanical properties [6–8]. More importantly, very body at low-temperature sintering, thus helps to fine grain microstructures may be obtained (particle CONTACT Mohsen Golieskardi Mohsen_golieskardi@yahoo.com Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, 43000 Kajang, Malaysia © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2 M. GOLIESKARDI ET AL. improve the mechanical properties of the sintered (20 mm diameter) and bars (4mmx material [15–20]. Samodurova [21] reported that com- 13mmx32mm) and underwent cold-isostatic press- bined effect of alumina and silica (up to 0.25 wt%) co- ing at 200 MPa before being sintered at various doping to 3Y-TZP results in improved resistance to temperatures (1250°C −1550°C), with a ramp rate ageing without affecting the mechanical properties. of 10°C/min and holding time of 2 h. Small addition of Al2O3 (<5%) is able to promote den- sification of Y-TZP ceramic. It is observed that small addition of Al2O3 could enhance sintering at low tem- Physical and mechanical characterizations peratures and cause impressive grain growth at higher The bulk densities of samples were determined using sintering temperatures. the Archimedes method (Mettler-Toledo AG204). Microstructure of the ceramics can be altered, Firstly, the samples were polished before their leading to dispersion strengthening through various Vickers hardness (Hv) values were measured using mechanisms [22–24] that eventually enhances the micro-indentation. During the test, a load of 1 kg was mechanical property of the material. The effects of exerted using a pyramidal jewel indenter for 10 s. Ten Al O and 3Y-TZP ceramic composites in vivo envir- 2 3 measurements were performed on each sample. On onment have been studied by Santos et al. [25]. This the other hand, the K values of all samples were analysis showed promising results, because the viabi- IC determined by measuring the cracks created upon lity of 90% of the composite material was clearly exerting a load of 2 kg for 10 s. The crack was above the 80% viability limit, which indicates an analyzed by using an image analysis program. Here, excellent biocompatibility of the material. Therefore, the equation proposed by Niihara et al. was employed it can be affirmed that the 3Y-TZP–Al O composite 2 3 [27]. The measurement was repeated 10 times for material can be classified as non-cytotoxic and there- each sample. fore having great potential for possible applications as implants. Another attractive dopant for the stabiliza- tion of 3Y-TZP is cerium oxide. It has been reported Cell culture study that the minor addition of cerium oxide (up to 0.5 wt %) to 3Y-TZP results in improved resistance to age- 2x105 cultured human osteoblasts (Passage 3 or 4) ing without affecting the mechanical properties. Rejab were seeded onto each Al2O3/CeO2 (either with the et al. [26] indicated that through increasing CeO2 ratio of 0.3/0.3 or 0.3/0.5) disc placed in a 24 well content the bulk density was increased and the per- plate. After 24 h, seeded discs were shifted to a new centage of porosity was decreased. This can improve 24-well plate. At day 1, day 4 and day 7, the seeded the toughness of the materials. discs were transferred to a new plate. At the respec- The aim of this work is to study the influence of tive time points, 40ul of PrestoBlue™ Reagent the combined effects of aluminium oxide and cerium (Invitrogen, USA) was added directly into the well oxide co-doping on the densification, Vickers hard- with 360ul of culture medium containing the ness, fracture toughness and cytotoxicity of 3 mol% seeded discs. The seeded disc samples placed into yttria-stabilized zirconia materials commonly utilized thewell-platewereincubatedfor2hat37ºC.After in the implants. incubation, the well-plate was shaken mildly for more uniform distribution of seeded cells into the disc samples, and transferred 100ul of the reaction Experimental procedures mix (in triplicates) into a 96-well plate. Absorbance was read at 570nm with a reference wavelength of Synthesis of 3Y-TZP ceramic and preparation of 600nm using a microplate reader (BioTek, USA). test samples Living cells that are metabolically active will reduce The starting materials used were as-received com- the non-fluorescent dye resazurin to a strongly mercial 3 mol% Y-TZP (Kyoritsu, Japan) cerium fluorescent dye resorufin. Absorbance is propor- oxide and aluminium oxide powders of 99.9% tional to the number of viable cells. Seeded discs purity (Sigma Aldrich). The 3 mol% Y-TZP pow- after the Presto Blue assay at Day 7, were subse- der was combined with various percentages of quently incubated in culture media twice for 24 aluminium oxide and cerium oxide powders; i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metal Oxide Nanostructures and Their Applications (ISBN 1-58883-170-1)
    Metal Oxide Nanostructures and their Applications (ISBN 1-58883-170-1) Edited by Ahmad Umar, Najran University, Saudi Arabia Yoon-Bong Hahn, Chonbuk National University, South Korea. Published by American Scientific Publishers, CA, USA, (http://www.aspbs.com/mona/) October 2009 5-Volume Set, 4,000 pages, Hardcover Volume 4 Applications (Part-2) Chapter 13 Bioactive Bioceramic Coatings. Part II: Coatings on Metallic Biomaterials (Vol.4, pp 479-509) Proof-reading Corrections: No. Original Correction 1. Reference [39] 39. A. K. Lynn and D. L. DuQuesnay, Biomaterials 23, 1947 (2002). 2. Reference [97] 97. M. Wei, A. J. Ruys, B. K. Milthorpe, C. C. Sorrell, and J. H. Evans, J. Sol–Gel Sci. Techn. 21, 39 (2001). 3. Figure 6b ⊕ PO ∇ CO Titania 4 3 48 h ⊕ ∇ ⊕ ⊕ ∇∇ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ∇ 24 h ∇ ⊕⊕ Reflectance /arb. units /arb. Reflectance 0 h 2000 1600 1200 800 400 Wavelength /cm-1 CHAPTER 13 Bioactive Bioceramic Coatings: Part II. Coatings on Metallic Biomaterials Jin-Ming Wu1,Min Wang 2 1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..................................... 2 2. Bioactive Bioceramic Coatings ....................... 2 2.1. Physical Deposition ........................... 2 2.2. Sol–Gel Process .............................. 5 2.3. Electrocrystallization, Electrophoretic Deposition, and Electrostatic Spray Deposition ................ 6 2.4. Biomimetic Process ........................... 7 2.5. Other Coating Techniques ..................... 10 3. Nanostructured Titania for In Vitro Apatite Deposition .... 10 3.1. Coating Approaches ......................... 11 3.2. Chemical Modification Approaches .............. 14 4. Composite Coatings .............................. 20 4.1. Ceramic/Metal Composite Coatings ............. 20 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioactive Glasses: from Parent 45S5 Composition to Scaffold-Assisted Tissue-Healing Therapies
    Journal of Functional Biomaterials Review Bioactive Glasses: From Parent 45S5 Composition to Scaffold-Assisted Tissue-Healing Therapies Elisa Fiume, Jacopo Barberi, Enrica Verné * and Francesco Baino * ID Institute of Materials Physics and Engineering, Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy; elisa.fiume@polito.it (E.F.); jacopo.barberi@studenti.polito.it (J.B.) * Correspondence: enrica.verne@polito.it (E.V.); francesco.baino@polito.it (F.B.); Tel.: +39-011-090-4717 (E.V.); +39-011-090-4668 (F.B.) Received: 19 February 2018; Accepted: 13 March 2018; Published: 16 March 2018 Abstract: Nowadays, bioactive glasses (BGs) are mainly used to improve and support the healing process of osseous defects deriving from traumatic events, tumor removal, congenital pathologies, implant revisions, or infections. In the past, several approaches have been proposed in the replacement of extensive bone defects, each one with its own advantages and drawbacks. As a result, the need for synthetic bone grafts is still a remarkable clinical challenge since more than 1 million bone-graft surgical operations are annually performed worldwide. Moreover, recent studies show the effectiveness of BGs in the regeneration of soft tissues, too. Often, surgical criteria do not match the engineering ones and, thus, a compromise is required for getting closer to an ideal outcome in terms of good regeneration, mechanical support, and biocompatibility in contact with living tissues. The aim of the present review is providing a general overview of BGs, with particular reference to their use in clinics over the last decades and the latest synthesis/processing methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Injectable Bioactive Glass in the Restoration of Oral Bone Defect
    European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2016; 20: 1665-1668 Injectable bioactive glass in the restoration of oral bone defect C.-B. HAN, S.-C. AN Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Weifang People’s Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China Abstract. – OBJECTIVE: To explore the appli- the optimal graft material, but these materials had cation value of injectable bioactive glass in the some limitations2. The injectable bioactive glass had restoration of the oral bone defect. good bioactivity and biocompatibility, ion exchange PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study includ- that occurred between the bioactive glass and soft ed 58 consecutive patients with oral bone defect > 1 mm, these patients were randomly assigned tissue as well as bone may be directly involved in to a control group (n=26, Hydroxyapatite bioce- the metabolism and restoration of human bone tis- ramics) and an observation group (n=32, Inject- sue. As a result, identical inorganic mineral, i.e., car- able bioactive glass). The purpose of this study bonated hydroxyapatite could form on the material was to assess the comparison of the healing of surface, inducing growth of new bone tissue3,4. Most oral bone defect. previous studies explored the application value of RESULTS: X-ray examination was performed at 5,6 6-month and 12-month following treatment. The bioactive glass through animal models , while this bone healing in the observation group was sig- study would further confirm the value of bioactive nificantly better than the control group (p <0.05), glass through clinical controlled trial in humans. the incidences of local rejection reactions were not significantly different (p >0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Current Progress in Solution Precursor Plasma Spraying of Cermets: a Review
    metals Review Current Progress in Solution Precursor Plasma Spraying of Cermets: A Review Romnick Unabia 1,2,*, Rolando Candidato Jr. 1 and Lech Pawłowski 2 ID 1 Physics Department, College of Science and Mathematics, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Philippines; r.candidatojr@gmail.com 2 IRCER UMR 7315 CNRS, University of Limoges, Limoges Cedex 87068, France; lech.pawlowski@unilim.fr * Correspondence: romnickunabia@gmail.com; Tel.: +33-0-587-502-400 Received: 1 May 2018; Accepted: 1 June 2018; Published: 4 June 2018 Abstract: Ceramic and metal composites, known also as cermets, may considerably improve many material properties with regards to that of initial components. Hence, cermets are frequently applied in many technological fields. Among many processes which can be employed for cermet manufacturing, thermal spraying is one of the most frequently used. Conventional plasma spraying of powders is a popular and cost-effective manufacturing process. One of its most recent innovations, called solution precursor plasma spraying (SPPS), is an emerging coating deposition method which uses homogeneously mixed solution precursors as a feedstock. The technique enables a single-step deposition avoiding the powder preparation procedures. The nanostructured coatings developed by SPPS increasingly find a place in the field of surface engineering. The present review shows the recent progress in the fabrication of cermets using SPPS. The influence of starting solution precursors, such as their chemistry, concentration, and solvents used, to the micro-structural characteristics of cermet coatings is discussed. The effect of the operational plasma spray process parameters such as solution injection mode to the deposition process and coatings’ microstructure is also presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Silicon Nitride, a Close to Ideal Ceramic Material for Medical Application
    ceramics Review Silicon Nitride, a Close to Ideal Ceramic Material for Medical Application Robert B. Heimann Am Stadtpark 2A, D-02826 Görlitz, Germany; robert.heimann@ocean-gate.de; Tel.: +49-3581-667851 Abstract: This topical review describes the salient results of recent research on silicon nitride, a ceramic material with unique properties. The outcome of this ongoing research strongly encourages the use of monolithic silicon nitride and coatings as contemporary and future biomaterial for a variety of medical applications. Crystallographic structure, the synthesis and processing of monolithic structures and coatings, as well as examples of their medical applications that relate to spinal, orthopedic and dental implants, bone grafts and scaffolds, platforms for intelligent synthetic neural circuits, antibacterial and antiviral particles and coatings, optical biosensors, and nano-photonic waveguides for sophisticated medical diagnostic devices are all covered in the research reviewed herein. The examples provided convincingly show that silicon nitride is destined to become a leader to replace titanium and other entrenched biomaterials in many fields of medicine. Keywords: silicon nitride; structure; properties; processing; coatings; spinal implants; arthroplastic implants; bone scaffolds; dental implants; neural circuits; biosensors; medical diagnostics Citation: Heimann, R.B. Silicon 1. Introduction Nitride, a Close to Ideal Ceramic Material for Medical Application. Today, the research and development of metallic, ceramic, polymeric and composite Ceramics 2021, 4, 208–223. biomaterials have progressed to a high level of involvement and sophistication. This is https://doi.org/10.3390/ related to the fact that an ever-increasing part of the world population is in need of the repair ceramics4020016 or replacement of dysfunctional or damaged parts of the body, such as dental roots and teeth, alveolar ridge augmentation, intraocular lenses, heart pacemakers, cochlear implants, Academic Editors: Stuart Hampshire and hip and knee endoprostheses [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Bioceramic in Dental Implants: a Review
    Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society (March 2010) 10:8–12 8DOI: 10.1007/s13191-010-0002-4 Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society (March 2010) 10:8–12 REVIEW ARTICLE Bioceramic in Dental Implants: A Review Gaurav P. Jayaswal, S. P. Dange, A. N. Khalikar © Indian Prosthodontic Society Biomaterials are non-drug substance suitable for inclusion in system which augment or replace the function of bodily tissue or organ. Orthopedic and dental applications represent approximately 55% of the total biomaterials market. Changes in biologic responses and device design have been the direct result of advances in material science. Bioceramics fulfi ll a unique function as biomedical materials. Bioceramics are non-toxic and bioinert, bioactive or bioresorbable. Bioceramics continue to be vital for bone repair and uncemented implant fi xation with recent advances in its composition and coating technology. Keywords: Biomaterials, Hydroxyapatite, Zirconia Introduction responses and device design have been the direct result of advances in material science. An implant is defi ned as a medical device made from one Bioceramics primarily have provided the research and or more biomaterials that is intentionally placed within the dental clinical professionals with new substances of interest body, either totally or partially buried beneath an epithelial for over last 2 decades. Various formulations of these surface. Biomaterials by defi nation is a non-drug substance materials have been conceived on the basis of their chemical suitable for inclusion in system which augment or replace the similarity to bone. function of bodily tissue or organ. From as early as a century ago artifi cial material and device have been developed to a point where they can replace various component of the Bioceramics human body.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation and Evaluation of Bioceramic Composite Based on Hydroxyapatite and Titania Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications Ibrahim
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 4, April-2016 641 ISSN 2229-5518 Preparation and evaluation of Bioceramic composite based on hydroxyapatite and titania nanoparticles for biomedical applications Ibrahim. H. M. Alya, Nasser A. M. Barakata,b, L. Abed Alrahim Mohammedc Abstract—in this study, composite material comprised of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles incorporated with bone derived hydroxyapatite was prepared to investigate the possibility of using it as bone substitute in high load bearing sites. The structure and phase composition of the produced sintered bodies were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Densification rate was evaluated by measuring apparent porosity. A mechanical characterization of the sintered samples was carried out by means of Vickers indentations and compressive strength determinations. The bioactivity was assessed by investigating the formation of apatite on the film surface after soaking in simulated body fluid. The results showed that the proposed composite present higher densification, better mechanical characteristics compared to pure hydroxyapatite. Moreover, the results also showed bone like apatite was formed on the surface of hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanoparticles soaked in simulated body fluid. The results obtained demonstrate that hydroxyapatite can be considered suitable as filler in biomedical applications while glass-ceramic matrix composite reinforced with titania nanostructure can be used in high load bearing applications from the point of view of the biomechnical properties. This behavior suggests a possibility of a further favorable in vivo response. Index Terms— Bioceramics, biomaterial, Bovine hydroxyapatite, Mechanical properties, In vitro study, simulated body fluid (SBF), titania nanoparticles ————————— —————————— 1. Introduction metals, polymers, calcium phosphate biomaterials, bioglasses have been studied for bone repair [1-6].
    [Show full text]
  • Bioceramics for Hard Tissue Engineering Applications: a Review
    International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 5 (2018) pp. 2744-2752 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com Bioceramics for Hard Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review Pawan Kumar1,*, Brijnandan S Dehiya1 and Anil Sindhu2 1Department of Materials Science and Nanotechnology 2Department of Biotechnology Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Sonipat-131039, India. Email: pawankamiya@yahoo.in Abstract tissue engineering [3]. In the early years, the focus on anti- infective or antibacterial biomaterials synthesis has been The bioceramics are using as a substitute for hard tissue increasing. It helps to prevent scaffolds or implants from engineering since 1960. A compelling way to deal with hard undesirable infection and keep sterile. It also reduces the risk tissue engineering aims to restore function of diseased or rate of infection during special surgery cases [4]. In cases of damaged bone tissue by combining isolated functional cells and open fractured joints and bone modification surgeries, the biodegradable scaffolds prepared from engineered implants can lead to the microbial disease [5]. The microbe’s bioceramics. Bioceramic materials having better potential to species attached on the surface of materials through different replace the damaged tissues and restore the function of existing mechanisms. According to early stated mechanism, microbe’s tissue. ZrO , Al O based materials and composites presently 2 2 3 adhesion done by passive adsorption through which bacterial used to fabricate implants. Bioceramics including cells exposed to a solid surface of biomaterials, which offers hydroxyapatite, bioglass, and calcium phosphate are using as surface interactions between materials and bacterial cells [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Additive Manufacturing of Hydroxyapatite Bioceramic Scaffolds: Dispersion, Digital Light Processing, Sintering, Mechanical Properties, and Biocompatibility
    Journal of Advanced Ceramics 2020, 9(3): 360–373 ISSN 2226-4108 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-020-0375-8 CN 10-1154/TQ Research Article Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffolds: Dispersion, digital light processing, sintering, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility Chengwei FENGa, Keqiang ZHANGa, Rujie HEa,*, Guojiao DINGa, Min XIAb, Xinxin JINc, Chen XIEd,* aInstitute of Advanced Structure Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China bSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China cSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150040, China dShanghai Aircraft Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201324, China Received: October 21, 2019; Revised: February 3, 2020; Accepted: March 18, 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. Abstract: Hydroxyapatite (HA) bioceramic scaffolds were fabricated by using digital light processing (DLP) based additive manufacturing. Key issues on the HA bioceramic scaffolds, including dispersion, DLP fabrication, sintering, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility were discussed in detail. Firstly, the effects of dispersant dosage, solid loading, and sintering temperature were studied. The optimal dispersant dosage, solid loading, and sintering temperature were 2 wt%, 50 vol%, and 1250 ℃, respectively. Then, the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the HA bioceramic scaffolds were investigated. The DLP-prepared porous HA bioceramic scaffold was found to exhibit excellent mechanical properties and degradation behavior. From this study, DLP technique shows good potential for manufacturing HA bioceramic scaffolds. Keywords: additive manufacturing; digital light processing; vat photopolymerization; hydroxyapatite; bioceramic scaffold and bioactivity [2–4]. The excellent osteoconductivity 1 Introduction makes HA as an artificial substitute material for bone, and also makes bone cells adhere, proliferate, and Bioceramics have attracted great attentions in recent mineralize on surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement of Reparative Bioceramics in Endodontics - a Critical Review
    Mini Review ISSN: 2574 -1241 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.24.004059 Improvement of Reparative Bioceramics in Endodontics - A Critical Review Stella Maris de Freitas Lima1*, Poliana Amanda Oliveira Silva2 and Taia Maria Berto Rezende1,2,3 1Dental Course, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brazil 2 Post graduation in Health Sciences, Universidade de Brasília, Brazil 3Post graduation in Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brazil *Corresponding author: Stella Maris de Freitas Lima, Professor of Endodontics, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brazil ARTICLE INFO Abstract Received: December 30, 2019 The advent of bioceramics materials increases the possibility of reparative and Published: January 10, 2020 regenerative processes in dentistry, and more precisely, in endodontics. Bioceramics materials presents biocompatibility, bioactivity, resistance to leakage, sealing ability, and biomineralization activity. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is a gold standard Citation: Stella Maris de Freitas Lima, bioceramic material indicated for reparative procedures presenting high clinical Poliana Amanda Oliveira Silva, Taia Maria Berto Rezende. Improvement of Repara- resorption repair, regenerative endodontics, and apical surgery. The emergence of success. MTA is used for pulp capping, pulpotomy, apexification, perforation, root tive Bioceramics in Endodontics - A Critical improvements of this bioceramic gave rise to many other materials. New bioceramic Review. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 24(3)- materialsMTA demonstrated are
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics, Preparation and Improvement of Porous Hydroxyapatite Bioceramic Materials
    id247101593 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com BBiiooTTISSNe e: 097cc4 - h7h435 nnooVlolluoome 8g gIssueyy 11 An Indian Journal FULL PAPER BTAIJ, 8(11), 2013 [1463-1470] Characteristics, preparation and improvement of porous hydroxyapatite bioceramic materials Yanrong Sun, Tao Fan*, Liguo Ma, Qiuxia, Zhang, Hongbo Li, Feng Liu Department of Materials Engineering, North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Langfang065000, (CHINA) E-mail: huahangfantao@126.com ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Hydroxyapatite exhibits the outstanding biocompatibility and bioactivity Porous; with bone replacement in living tissues. Porous hydroxyapatite bioceramic Hydroxyapatite; is able to intensity the osteoconduction and osteoinduction and suitable Bioceramic. for artificial bone substitutes. By means of controllingporosity, size, interconnectivity and surface roughness of pores, the porous HA with optimal properties can be obtained. Variousmethods for preparing porous HA bioceramic have been introduced, such as pore-forming agent method, foaming method, conversion of natural body, colloidal template method, and freeze casting. To improve properties of porous HA bioceramic, two or several kinds of preparation methodshave beencombined to use, and designing and developing porous HA-based biocomposite materials is also acceptable. 2013 Trade Science Inc. - INDIA INTRODUCTION focus on preparing porous HA ceramics, tailoring the morphology of HA powders, and Designing HA com- [6] Hydroxyapatite ([Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2], HA or HAP), posites . Porous HA have been applied for cell load- one of the most representational bioceramic, which ex- ing, drug releasing agents, chromatography analysis, and hibits the outstanding biocompatibility and bioactivity the most extensively for hard tissue scaffolds[7,8].
    [Show full text]
  • Coehlo P, Bromage TG. Challenges In
    Chapter 1 The Challenges in Engineering and Testing Dental Bioceramics by Paulo Coelho and Timothy G. Bromage Introduction The clinical success of modern dental ceramics is predicated on a number of factors, such as the initial physical properties of these brittle materials, the fabrication and clinical procedures that unavoidably damage them, and the oral environment. Examining how these factors influence clinical performance has involved investigators from the dental, ceramics, and engineering communities. This chapter will first summarize the rationale behind engineering biomimetic ceramic dental restorative materials, then critically describe the basic methodology and analytic results reported in recent literature. Basic Properties of Enamel and Dentin as Objectives for Bioceramic Development There are several important properties of tooth structure relevant to bioceramic biomimetic design. Paramount is (1) mechanical efficacy, largely a function of tooth crown morphology, enamel thickness and microstructure, and root structure. Related to this is (2) proprioception, the internal perceptions that allow us to reduce the probability of catastrophic fracture from excessive loads transmitted through enamel into dentine and the supporting structures. An additional consideration is (3) the porosity of healthy enamel. Further, it is fair to say that people who take their oral care seriously enough to be receiving bioceramic implants will also be concerned with (4) the aesthetics of their natural teeth. Finally, if properly managed, enamel
    [Show full text]