DOCSLIB.ORG

Onlinehs: Biology a > Ecology Final Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Onlinehs: Biology a > Ecology Final Project OnlineHS: Biology A > Ecology Final Project This is your demonstration of learning for the Ecology unit. Scenario: You are an ecologist working for a committee that reports to the United Nations, called Earth Think. Your job is to study various ecosystems on Earth to ensure that all populations and species are preserved. As you are studying the ecosystems of Earth, you find that a specific species population and that organism’s ecosystem is in danger! You will need to notify the United Nations Committee of the problem occurring in the ecosystem of your organism! Help them to see how this organism population is an important part of the ecosystem, and without it, the ecosystem will collapse! Your goal: Create a presentation (use PowerPoint or make a video--your choice) whose purpose is to convince a committee to preserve a species in a specific ecosystem. In this presentation: 1. You will describe the ecosystem. ● With 3-5 sentence descriptions. ● Identify the abiotic and biotic components of the ecosystem. 2. Identify your species in the levels of organization species.-- biosphere. 3. Draw or create a diagram of a food web containing your species. ● Food web must contain at least 3 food chains (each chain has 3 or more organisms) . ● Identify the producers, (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary) Consumers and Decomposers ● Use arrows showing the flow of energy. 4. Describe interactions between your organism species and abiotic & biotic components of one cycle studied in class. Explain how your organism is part of a cycle. 5. Explain how carrying capacity in your ecosystem will support the preservation of your species population. 6. Give one example of how carrying capacity can be exceeded to decrease the population of your species. Page 1 of 3 7. Offer solutions to ensure the preservation of your population. ● List 2 or more solutions. 8. Include a labeled graph to help explain one component of your presentation. This could be population comparisons, populations over time, graphs to show carrying capacity, biomass 9. At the end of your presentation, list your resources or websites used in the presentation. You MUST have external sources of information. Use the Internet, books, or magazines, etc. Cite them correctly using: http://www.easybib.com Start here! Review the “Ecology Final Project Grading Rubric” (at to bottom of this page) to see how your presentation will be graded and the components you will want to include to earn the grade you want for demonstrating your understanding. Get ready: You may want to base your project off of a population of organism that has been interesting to you in the past. If you have no preferences, Ideas and potential ecosystems could be found at the following websites: ● Marine Food Web: http://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/Contexts/Life-in-the-Sea/Sci- Media/Animations-and-Interactives/Marine-ecosystem ● Arctic food web http://sonic.net/~birdman/arctic/foodweb.htm ● Sea Otter Food web http://cbc.amnh.org/crisis/foodweb.html ● Desert Food web http://digital-desert.com/wildlife/food-chains/ Grading: • Your presentation can be a PowerPoint, video, or paper. Ask your teacher if you have another suggestion. • See the rubric below--Your presentation will be graded on the 10 items listed in left column w/ pts from top row. • Grading Scale- 100 pts Possible. 0-60= F, 61-69= D, 70-79= C, 80-89= B, 90-100= A • Should you have any questions regarding this assignment, contact your instructor Page 2 of 3 ECOLOGY FINAL PROJECT RUBRIC item 0 points 5 points 7 points 10 points 3-5 descriptive No description or one 3 or more sentences 1. Description of 3-5 descriptive sentences that paint a that is less then 3 about ecosystem that ecosystem sentences. vivid picture of the sentences contain little description ecosystem Identifies at least 3 Identifies at least 3 Identifies at least 5 2. Identifies factors each, that are factors each, that are factors each, that are abiotic & biotic No identification of biotic and abiotic. No biotic and abiotic. biotic and abiotic. factors and factors nor interactions interactions given Details interactions Details interactions interactions between factors & between factors & between factors & species. species. species. 3. Identification Describes the species Describes the species of species level No identification of level Gives a level. No place in the level of organizational level and of organization of organization description organization relationship to others. in biosphere The web given is both The food web is The food web is graphical and graphical OR descriptive graphical and descriptive with 3 No graphical or and contains at least 3 descriptive and contains distinctly different food 4. Food web descriptive web or the food chains that are at least 3 food chains chains of 3 or more web given is inaccurate. connected at at least that are connected at organisms that one organism. least one organism. interconnect to make a complex web. 5. Understands Gives at least 1 Gives more then 1 the relationship example of how carrying example and describes between Does not relate carrying Wrongly explains the capacity can be in detail the relationship Carrying capacity to population relationship exceeded to decrease between carrying Capacity and the population of your capacity and population. population. species. Included a meticulous graph that was Included a graph that Include an accurate & 6. Data accurate, labeled, and No graph was not accurate or did labeled graph to help Presentation was visually clear in not explain a component explain one component explaining a component An argument is present 7. Argument for An argument is Presents a compelling No argument or, simply but is weak and/or preserving your presented for preserving argument for preserving a presentation of facts. includes no rationale for chosen species the chosen species. their species. preservation. At least 1 reference At least 3 references At least 1 reference 8. References No references cited. cited correctly or 3 given AND cited given. references given. correctly Too many errors, Presentation is Near perfect. No misspellings, & mistakes Many errors that detract organized with few 9. Mechanics spelling or convention to be considered from the presentation. errors that detract from errors. serious. the presentation 10. Not turned-in on or Received by teacher on <- -> Presentation before deadline. or before deadline Page 3 of 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revised Glossary for AQA GCSE Biology Student Book
    Biology Glossary amino acids small molecules from which proteins are A built abiotic factor physical or non-living conditions amylase a digestive enzyme (carbohydrase) that that affect the distribution of a population in an breaks down starch ecosystem, such as light, temperature, soil pH anaerobic respiration respiration without using absorption the process by which soluble products oxygen of digestion move into the blood from the small intestine antibacterial chemicals chemicals produced by plants as a defence mechanism; the amount abstinence method of contraception whereby the produced will increase if the plant is under attack couple refrains from intercourse, particularly when an egg might be in the oviduct antibiotic e.g. penicillin; medicines that work inside the body to kill bacterial pathogens accommodation ability of the eyes to change focus antibody protein normally present in the body acid rain rain water which is made more acidic by or produced in response to an antigen, which it pollutant gases neutralises, thus producing an immune response active site the place on an enzyme where the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) an increasing substrate molecule binds problem in the twenty-first century whereby active transport in active transport, cells use energy bacteria have evolved to develop resistance against to transport substances through cell membranes antibiotics due to their overuse against a concentration gradient antiretroviral drugs drugs used to treat HIV adaptation features that organisms have to help infections; they
    [Show full text]
  • Human Anatomy (Biology 2) Lecture Notes Updated July 2017 Instructor
    Human Anatomy (Biology 2) Lecture Notes Updated July 2017 Instructor: Rebecca Bailey 1 Chapter 1 The Human Body: An Orientation • Terms - Anatomy: the study of body structure and relationships among structures - Physiology: the study of body function • Levels of Organization - Chemical level 1. atoms and molecules - Cells 1. the basic unit of all living things - Tissues 1. cells join together to perform a particular function - Organs 1. tissues join together to perform a particular function - Organ system 1. organs join together to perform a particular function - Organismal 1. the whole body • Organ Systems • Anatomical Position • Regional Names - Axial region 1. head 2. neck 3. trunk a. thorax b. abdomen c. pelvis d. perineum - Appendicular region 1. limbs • Directional Terms - Superior (above) vs. Inferior (below) - Anterior (toward the front) vs. Posterior (toward the back)(Dorsal vs. Ventral) - Medial (toward the midline) vs. Lateral (away from the midline) - Intermediate (between a more medial and a more lateral structure) - Proximal (closer to the point of origin) vs. Distal (farther from the point of origin) - Superficial (toward the surface) vs. Deep (away from the surface) • Planes and Sections divide the body or organ - Frontal or coronal 1. divides into anterior/posterior 2 - Sagittal 1. divides into right and left halves 2. includes midsagittal and parasagittal - Transverse or cross-sectional 1. divides into superior/inferior • Body Cavities - Dorsal 1. cranial cavity 2. vertebral cavity - Ventral 1. lined with serous membrane 2. viscera (organs) covered by serous membrane 3. thoracic cavity a. two pleural cavities contain the lungs b. pericardial cavity contains heart c. the cavities are defined by serous membrane d.
    [Show full text]
  • Can More K-Selected Species Be Better Invaders?
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2007) 13, 535–543 Blackwell Publishing Ltd BIODIVERSITY Can more K-selected species be better RESEARCH invaders? A case study of fruit flies in La Réunion Pierre-François Duyck1*, Patrice David2 and Serge Quilici1 1UMR 53 Ӷ Peuplements Végétaux et ABSTRACT Bio-agresseurs en Milieu Tropical ӷ CIRAD Invasive species are often said to be r-selected. However, invaders must sometimes Pôle de Protection des Plantes (3P), 7 chemin de l’IRAT, 97410 St Pierre, La Réunion, France, compete with related resident species. In this case invaders should present combina- 2UMR 5175, CNRS Centre d’Ecologie tions of life-history traits that give them higher competitive ability than residents, Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), 1919 route de even at the expense of lower colonization ability. We test this prediction by compar- Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex, France ing life-history traits among four fruit fly species, one endemic and three successive invaders, in La Réunion Island. Recent invaders tend to produce fewer, but larger, juveniles, delay the onset but increase the duration of reproduction, survive longer, and senesce more slowly than earlier ones. These traits are associated with higher ranks in a competitive hierarchy established in a previous study. However, the endemic species, now nearly extinct in the island, is inferior to the other three with respect to both competition and colonization traits, violating the trade-off assumption. Our results overall suggest that the key traits for invasion in this system were those that *Correspondence: Pierre-François Duyck, favoured competition rather than colonization. CIRAD 3P, 7, chemin de l’IRAT, 97410, Keywords St Pierre, La Réunion Island, France.
    [Show full text]
  • To What Degree Are Philosophy and the Ecological Niche Concept Necessary in the Ecological Theory and Conservation?
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY EJE 2017, 3(1): 42-54, doi: 10.1515/eje-2017-0005 To what degree are philosophy and the ecological niche concept necessary in the ecological theory and conservation? Universidade Federal Rogério Parentoni Martins* do Ceará, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Departamento ABSTRACT de Biologia, Centro de Ecology as a field produces philosophical anxiety, largely because it differs in scientific structure from classical Ciências, Brazil physics. The hypothetical deductive models of classical physics are simple and predictive; general ecological *Corresponding author, models are predictably limited, as they refer to complex, multi-causal processes. Inattention to the conceptual E-mail: rpmartins917@ structure of ecology usually imposes difficulties for the application of ecological models. Imprecise descrip- gmail.com tions of ecological niche have obstructed the development of collective definitions, causing confusion in the literature and complicating communication between theoretical ecologists, conservationists and decision and policy-makers. Intense, unprecedented erosion of biodiversity is typical of the Anthropocene, and knowledge of ecology may provide solutions to lessen the intensification of species losses. Concerned philosophers and ecolo- gists have characterised ecological niche theory as less useful in practice; however, some theorists maintain that is has relevant applications for conservation. Species niche modelling, for instance, has gained traction in the literature; however, there are few examples of its successful application. Philosophical analysis of the structure, precision and constraints upon the definition of a ‘niche’ may minimise the anxiety surrounding ecology, poten- tially facilitating communication between policy-makers and scientists within the various ecological subcultures. The results may enhance the success of conservation applications at both small and large scales.
    [Show full text]
  • COULD R SELECTION ACCOUNT for the AFRICAN PERSONALITY and LIFE CYCLE?
    Person. individ.Diff. Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 665-675, 1993 0191-8869/93 S6.OOf0.00 Printedin Great Britain.All rightsreserved Copyright0 1993Pergamon Press Ltd COULD r SELECTION ACCOUNT FOR THE AFRICAN PERSONALITY AND LIFE CYCLE? EDWARD M. MILLER Department of Economics and Finance, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, U.S.A. (Received I7 November 1992; received for publication 27 April 1993) Summary-Rushton has shown that Negroids exhibit many characteristics that biologists argue result from r selection. However, the area of their origin, the African Savanna, while a highly variable environment, would not select for r characteristics. Savanna humans have not adopted the dispersal and colonization strategy to which r characteristics are suited. While r characteristics may be selected for when adult mortality is highly variable, biologists argue that where juvenile mortality is variable, K character- istics are selected for. Human variable birth rates are mathematically similar to variable juvenile birth rates. Food shortage caused by African drought induce competition, just as food shortages caused by high population. Both should select for K characteristics, which by definition contribute to success at competition. Occasional long term droughts are likely to select for long lives, late menopause, high paternal investment, high anxiety, and intelligence. These appear to be the opposite to Rushton’s r characteristics, and opposite to the traits he attributes to Negroids. Rushton (1985, 1987, 1988) has argued that Negroids (i.e. Negroes) were r selected. This idea has produced considerable scientific (Flynn, 1989; Leslie, 1990; Lynn, 1989; Roberts & Gabor, 1990; Silverman, 1990) and popular controversy (Gross, 1990; Pearson, 1991, Chapter 5), which Rushton (1989a, 1990, 1991) has responded to.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology: Syllabus Instructor: Mr. Shannon Contact Information Steve Shannon Room 85 School Phone: (402) 443-4332 Ext
    Biology: Syllabus Instructor: Mr. Shannon Contact Information Steve Shannon Room 85 School Phone: (402) 443-4332 Ext. 3224 Email: [email protected] General Course Description This course begins with a consideration of the living condition and discussion of the unique properties of living organisms that set life apart from the non-living. It continues with molecular and cellular biology, from which it moves logically into reproduction and genetics. An understanding of genetics gives meaning to organized variation, evolution and methods of scientific classification units dealing with microbiology and plant and animal phylum. This course is designed for the college-bound student. Students should expect a demanding daily homework load as well as projects, quizzes, tests, and laboratory write-ups. A high level of understanding in problem solving and the scientific methods is necessary for success in this course. Daily Class Materials Needed *Student Planner *Modern Biology textbook *3 Ring Binder/Folder *Notebook *Pen/Pencil *Calculator Daily Requirements: All students will be required to keep a 3-Ring Binder with all their classroom materials in the binder. This binder will hold the student’s Vocabulary Word List, Notes, Classroom Assignments and Activities, Labs, Quizzes, and Reviews. This notebook will be graded at the end of every chapter. General Routines and Procedures 1. BE ON TIME AND PREPARED FOR LEARNING *Respect for Others (Teachers, Students, and Community) -Ways to Show Respect to Others: 1. Make good eye contact when communicating with others 2. BE ON TIME! Punctuality is vital in today’s world. Virtually any job you may have will require you to be on time and ready to work.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Biology - Alberto M
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. I – History of Biology - Alberto M. Simonetta HISTORY OF BIOLOGY Alberto M. Simonetta Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e Genetica, “L. Pardi,” University of Firenze, Italy Keywords: Biology, history, Antiquity, Middle ages, Renaissance, morphology, palaeontology, taxonomy, evolution, histology, embryology, genetics, ethology, ecology, pathology Contents 1. Introduction 2. Antiquity 3. The Medieval and Renaissance periods 4. The Development of Morphology 5. Paleontology 6. Taxonomy and Evolution 7. Histology, Reproduction, and Embryology 8. Physiology 9. Genetics 10. Ecology and Ethology 11. Pathology Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary A short account is given of the development of biological sciences from their Greek origins to recent times. Biology as a pure science was the creation of Aristotle, but was abandoned shortly after his death. However, considerable advances relevant for medicine continued to be made until the end of classical times, in such fields as anatomy and botany. These developments are reviewed. After a long pause, both pure and applied research began anew in the thirteenth century, and developedUNESCO at an increasing pace therea fter.– However, EOLSS unlike astronomy and physics, which experienced a startling resurgence as soon as adequate mathematical methods and instruments became available, the development of biology was steady but slow until the appearance of Darwin’s revolutionary ideas about evolution brought about a fundamental shiftSAMPLE in the subject’s outlook. TheCHAPTERS efflorescence of biological sciences in the post-Darwinian period is outlined briefly. 1. Introduction To outline more than 2000 years of biology in a few pages is an extremely difficult endeavor as, quite apart from the complexities of both the subject itself and of the technical and theoretical approaches of various scholars, the development of scholars’ views, ideas, and researches forms an intricate network that cannot be fully disentangled in such a brief account.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Niche Theory: a Brief Review
    The International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) | ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) Volume 3, Issue 2, No.2, DIP: 18.01.022/20160302 ISBN: 978-1-329-81573-5 http://www.ijip.in | January - March, 2016 Ecological Niche Theory: A Brief Review Mina Khatibi1*, Razieh Sheikholeslami2 ABSTRACT In ecology, a niche is a term with a variety of meanings related to the behavior of a species living under specific environmental conditions. The ecological niche describes how an organism or population responds to the distribution of resources and competitors. The ecological niche concept expresses the relationship of an individual or a population to all aspects of its environment. Studies on the relationship between human population and environmental resources have employed niche concept. Ecological niche comprehends all conditions necessary for an organism to exist. Keywords: Niche, Ecology, Environment, Organism What is ecological niche? 1. The position or function of an organism or a population within a biological and physical environment. 2. The area within a habitat occupied by an organism. The ecological niche is an organism position in the habitat (Online Psychology Dictionary, 2014). The ecological niche concept, as proposed by Hutchinson (1957), expresses the relationship of an individual or a population to all aspects of its environment. Studies on the relationship between human population and environmental resources have employed niche concept (Adams, 2002; Hanazaki and Begossi, 2004; Cavallini and Nordi, 2005; Silva and Begossi, 2009). According to Hardesty (1972), ecological niche comprehends all conditions necessary for an organism to exist. Considering the ecological niche, it can analyze each one of all interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Nearshore Ecosystems As Fish and Shellfish Nurseries
    l About Issues in Ecology Issues in Ecology is designed to report, in language understandable by non-scientists, the consensus of a panel of scientific experts on issues relevant to the environment. Issues in Ecology is supported by the Pew Scholars in Conservation Biology program and by the Ecological Society of America. It is published at irregular intervals, as reports are com- pleted. All reports undergo peer review and must be approved by the Editorial Board before publication. No responsibility for the views expressed by authors in ESA publica- tions is assumed by the editors or the publisher, the Ecological Society of America. Issues in Ecology is an official publication of the Ecological Society of America, the nation’s leading professional society of ecologists. Founded in 1915, ESA seeks to promote the responsible application of ecological principles to the solution of environmental problems. For more information, contact the Ecological Society of America, 1707 H Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC, 20006. ISSN 1092-8987 PublishedIssues by the Ecological Society of America in Eco Number 11, lSpringogy 2003 The RoleofNearshoreEcosystems as Fish andShellfishNurseries as Fish Issues in Ecology Number 11 Spring 2003 The Role of Nearshore Ecosystems as Fish and Shellfish Nurseries SUMMARY Coastal ecosystems provide many vital ecological and economic services, including shoreline protection, productive commercial and sport fisheries, and nutrient cycling. Key nearshore ecosystems such as seagrass meadows, marshes, and mangrove forests
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on the Life Sciences a Guide to Biology Careers
    SPOTLIGHT ON THE LIFE SCIENCES A GUIDE TO BIOLOGY CAREERS A collection of articles and interviews on the many branches of biology from The Biologist 1 CONTENTS Contents 2 Foreword 4 Choosing a career CORE BIOLOGY 6 Biochemistry 8 Ecology 10 Marine biology 12 Microbiology 14 Mycology 16 Physiology 18 Plant science 20 Zoology MEDICINE 22 Bioengineering 24 Clinical trials 26 Endocrinology 28 Immunology 30 Neuroscience 32 Nutrition 34 Parasitology 36 Pharmacology SPECIAL INTEREST 38 Aerobiology 40 Agroecology 42 Cryobiology 44 Photobiology 46 Sustainable agriculture FUTURE BIOLOGY 48 Bioinformatics 50 Epigenetics 52 Proteomics 54 Synthetic biology 56 Systems biology 3 INTRODUCTION Foreword disciplines are all about and what careers they might lead to. It’s useful to know whether you’re going to be spending most of your time outdoors or in the lab, for example, or whether your work will be about making discoveries through research. Or solving practical problems. Or working with animals. Or people. Or numbers. We hope this collection of articles from the past two years will help you in this way. Some of the sections of this booklet will be useful for people just about to choose an undergraduate degree, while the later ones might help graduates decide on the direction to take when considering a master’s or PhD. Others may be looking to move into he wonderful thing about biology is employment after their education, thinking its immense breadth. Biologists of doing a higher level apprenticeship, or study everything from the simplest just considering a career break to study life on Earth, like viruses or something that has always fascinated them.
    [Show full text]
  • Life, Not Itself: Inanimacy and the Limits of Biology
    Life, Not Itself: Inanimacy and the Limits of Biology The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Roosth, Sophia. 2014. “Life, Not Itself: Inanimacy and the Limits of Biology.” Grey Room 57 (October): 56–81. doi:10.1162/grey_a_00156. Published Version doi:10.1162/GREY_a_00156 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:14023015 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Ernst Haeckel. Bathybius haeckelii . Plate 17 from “ Beitrage zur Plastidentheorie,” Jenaische Zeitschrift für Medizin und Naturwissenschaft , vol. 5, 1870. 56 doi:10.1162/GREY_a_00156 Life, Not Itself: Inanimacy and the Limits of Biology SOPHIA ROOSTH Origins: Mud and Slime Something that for three months had looked like a rock got up and moved about a foot, then settled down again and looked like a rock for three more months. Another rocklike thing sprouted an arm and waved it about for twelve hours, then remained motionless for the rest of the six months. Life proceeds without haste in the deep. So the New York Times reported on time-lapse photographers seeking valuable minerals on the Pacific seafloor in 1977. 1 How quickly must life proceed to count as life? What defines life when the animating processes that mark the living slow into imperceptibility, as life deanimates, slackening or pausing from the temporalities of biological phenomena into epochs geological? Such an uncanny discovery, made possible by the temporal disruptions of stop-motion photography, tests the limits of the organic and the inorganic, the living and the lifeless, in the silty beds of a salty sea.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Four Indexes Based on Zooplankton As Trophic State Indicators in Reservoirs
    Limnetica, 38(1): 291-302 (2019). DOI: 10.23818/limn.38.06 © Asociación Ibérica de Limnología, Madrid. Spain. ISSN: 0213-8409 A comparative study of four indexes based on zooplankton as trophic state indicators in reservoirs Daniel Montagud1,*, Juan M. Soria1, Xavier Soria-Perpiñà2, Teresa Alfonso1 and Eduardo Vicente1 1 Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology (ICBIBE). University of Valencia, 46980-Pater- na, Spain. 2 Image Processing Laboratory. University of Valencia, 46980-Paterna, Spain. * Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 15/02/18 Accepted: 25/06/18 ABSTRACT A comparative study of four indices based on zooplankton as trophic state indicators in reservoirs This study aims to examine four recently conducted trophic state indices that are based on the density of zooplankton and designed for estimating the trophic state of inland waters. These indices include two with formulations based on quotients or ratios, the Rcla and the Rzoo-chla, which were proposed and validated in the European project ECOFRAME (Moss et al., 2003), and two with formulations based on the incorporation of a statistical tool comprising canonical correspondences analysis (CCA), the Wetland Zooplankton Index proposed in 2002 by researchers from McMaster University of Ontario (Lougheed & Chow-Fraser, 2002) and the Zooplankton Reservoir Trophic Index, an index recently designed by the Ebro Basin Authority and on which this manuscript is the first article. These indices were studied and applied in 53 heterogeneous reservoirs of the Ebro Basin. In addition, all were subsequently validated by Carlson’s Trophic State Index based on the amount of chlorophyll a (Carlson, 1977), with significant differences found between them.
    [Show full text]