Dubinsky Deals Stab-In-Back to Labor in Taft-Hartley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dubinsky Deals Stab-In-Back to Labor in Taft-Hartley Workers of (he World, Unite! MURRAY on 'MORALITY 7 OF DUTCH BLITZKRIEG AGAINST INDONESIANS ••• See Page 3 — THE MILITANT PUBLISHED WEEKLY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE WORKING PEOPLE V ol. X III - No. 1 267 NEW YORK, N. Y., MONDAY JANUAY 3, 1949 PRICE: FIVE CENTS SWP Plenum a Opens Offensive Dubinsky Deals Stab-in-Back O n A nti-Marxists National Body Outlines Program to Defend To Labor in Taft-Hartley Fight Union Democracy, Labor Independence N E W YO RK , Dec. 27— The 20th Anniversary Plenum of the Socialist Workers Party, which concluded here tonight, NMII Chiefs Copy mapped out an ideological and political counter-offensive against ILGWU Bureaucrats Peddle all the enemies of Marxism in®----------------------------------------------- CP Methods in the labor movement. elected National Secretary, and Taking advantage of the crimes M. Stein was again chosen as OwnAnti-Strike'Substitutes’ Organization Secretary. A Trade Purge of Stalinists of Stalinism, the top union of­ By Art Preis ficials and their Social-Democratic Union Department was establish­ By Ralph Bell ed, with Bert Cochran, veteran allies are waging a war of distor­ The anti-Stalinist purge in tion and defamation against the CIO leader, as chairman. While basking in the sunshine of swanky Miami Marxist program for the socialist Farrell Dobbs, presidential the C IO National Maritime candidate in 1948 and for many Beach, Fla., the well-heeled bureaucrats on the gen-i liberation of mankind. At the Union was accelerated last week years editor of The M ilitant, war same time they are attacking with the expulsion of three prom­ eral executive board of the AFL International Ladies elected National Chairman of the democracy in the unions and inent Stalinists and the suspen­ SWP. Dobbs, who was the Party’s Garment Workers Union ' h fastening their dictatorial grip on sion fo r one year of four others banner bearer in the election the workers, aiding and abetting on charges of “anti-union activi­ announced on Dec. 26 campaign, w ill now continue, :r the schemes of the capitalist gov­ ty.” Under the general head of details of a proposed “ substi­ the capacity of party chairman ernment to deprive the unions of “anti-union activity” were includ­ tute” for the Taft-Hartley Act their independence. the activity he began during the ed such charges as participating that has promptly been dubbec presidential campaign. He will in an illegal meeting, circulating The campaign of the SWP to (he “ Bubinsky-Taft-Hartlcy Bill.’ testify before congressional com­ literature containing slanderous strengthen and advance the Marx­ ILGWU President David Dubin­ mittees and utilize all possible attacks on union officials and ist program in the labor move­ sky—whom the Big Business press mediums of expression to publicize disruption of union meetings. ment w ill begin w ith the follow­ nas frequently praised as the the program of the party. The tria l was strongly remi­ ing measures decided on by the niscent 6f the technique perfected “ most responsible” and “ states­ plenum: CANNON’S REPORT by the Stalinists in dealing with manlike” union leader in the 1. An organized and well-in­ The report that aroused the union opponents during their country—is the chief author of legrated campaign in the ideo­ greatest, discussion of the two period in office. It was a mass this first “substitute” anti-labor logical, theoretical and political day sessions was the one bj trial in which diverse elements bill put forward by any major spheres against the enemies of Cannon on “ New Problems of were lumped together in a group union. But it is widely know- Marxism in the labor movement, the American Labor Movement.’ and voted on as a whole. Included that Dubinsky and’ other AFL whose sinister influence has been The growth and consolidation of with the Stalinists were individ­ top leaders held a secret meeting growing in recent years. a conservative labor bureaucracy uals charged with such offenses with Truman in the White House 2. A struggle to defend demo­ he said, and its alliance with as shipping o ff the dock, use of several weeks ago at which the cracy in the unions, for the in­ Social Democrats and renegade: deadly weapons, defacing union AFL heads made far-reaching dependence of the unions from in support of American imperial­ shipping cards, etc. The latter commitments on a new labor- the government, and fo r in­ ism, obliges the Marxists to re­ came off with the lightest penal­ control law. dependent labor political action. examine the situation in the ties. Dubinsky’s “ substitute” law St. An intensified campaign labor movement and define their The tria l committee was a would go beyond even what Tru­ against the current witch-hunt, methods of struggle more “hanging committee” composed of man is reported to be seeking in administration adherents. The with the objective of defeating precisely. the way of union-curbing legisla­ thg government’s attempts to count was taken by administra­ tion. It would foist on all Amer­ The early days . of the move­ tion-appointed counters. A re­ DAVID DUBINSKY outlaw or half-outlaw the SWP ment, Cannon recalled, were of ican labor a law modeled on the and other working class organ­ quest by the accused that the notorious Railway Labor Act the Taft-JIaitlcy Act arid' the necessity a 1 m o s't exclusively count be checked by their own izations through the “subversive” that has hamstrung the railroad Railway Labor Act, for stalling devoted to. theoretical exposition counters was rejected by the ad­ Who Will Do Planning blacklist. and polemic, designed to combat workers since the first World o ff union demands and halting ministration chairman. The ac­ militant union struggle. 4. An extension of the effec­ the degeneration of Stalinism, to cused were required to speak War and driven them from first tive propaganda and agitation work out the party’s program to 20th position in comparative This proposal is all the more first, w ith the last word reserved treacherous coming at the very methods developed in the presi­ and to assemble the cadres of the for President Joseph Curran, the Under U. S. Socialism ? wages with other industries. It time one million members of 16 dential election campaign. organization. In recent years the main architect of the purge. would give the capitalist govern­ By Farrell Dobbs non-operating railroad unions are 5. A strengthened SWP staff, SWP devoted itself increasingly A fter Curran completed a ment exceptional powers to in­ increasing the striking power of to practical work of organization twenty minute attack on the ac­ The nature of planning under socialism is described by Farrell Dobbs, National Chairman terfere in internal union affairs, being stalled by a “ cooling o ff” period after months of fruitless the Trotskyist press, improving and general anti-capitalist agita­ cused, discussion was immediately of the Socialist Workers Party, in the following letter to Sylvia E. Porter, columnist on the regulate the unions, break strikes the direction and coordination of and otherwise fulfill the aims of negotiations, climaxed by a dirty tion. The 1948 presidential cam­ closed and a vote taken. Observers New York Post. the party’s work in the trade paign was the highest point of at the union meeting concede that the Taft-Hartley Act itself. deal handed them by the gov­ December 29, 1948 man needs and to erect a new that only the rich can now afford unions and other mass organiza­ the party’s activity in this field. i f an accurate count had been ernment’s “ fact-finding” board. tions. taken of the hand vote, the report, Dear Miss Porter, culture not for an elite but for w ill be enjoyed by everybody. MAJOR FEATURES This board rejected all the unions’ In the next period, however, Your column of Dec. 21 in the the mass of the people. While collective ownership will James P. Cannon, the founder Cannon warned, the party must of the trial committe would have The major feature of Dubin­ basic demands. For instance, been rejected. As it was, the N. Y. Post reports that Norman Socialism w ill abolish the cap­ prevail in the means of produc­ sky’s proposed stab-in-the-back when the unions asked for a 40- of American Trotskyism, was re­ (Continued on Page 2) Thomas, in an interview on the official tally recorded was 1,172 ita list system of causing a rtificial tion, each person w ill retain p ri­ at American labor is the provi­ hour instead of the present 48- radio program “ Meet the Press,” to accept the trial committee re? scarcities in order to coin huge vate ownership of his fa ir share sions fo r blocking strikes in so- hour veck, with premium pay failed to answer your questions corporation profits. Wealthy cor­ of the fruits of production. port with 667 opposed. The de­ called “ vital” industries through for Saturdays, Sundays and holi­ about economic planning under poration owners will no longer mand for a recount was summari­ You may object that this is mere days, the board offered a 40-hour socialism. You ask if “ any social­ “ theory,” not ‘’practice.” For you compulsory “ cooling off” periods Stalinist Legislator in Ceylon ly refused. live in fantastic luxury at the staggered work week, without ist among you” wants to try his expense of the great mass of the spy in your column, “ To date, no and “ fa ct-fin d in g ” government premium pay on week-ends and “THEIR OWN MEDICINE” hand at it? I accept your invita­ people. The basic means of pro­ one has shown me how to avoid bo:irds.
Recommended publications
  • An Examination of Three Attorneys Who Represented
    UCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review Title Three Brave Men: An Examinantion of Three Attorneys Who Represented the Hollywood Nineteen in the House Un-American Activities Committee Hearings in 1947 and the Consequences They Faced Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7mq6r2rb Journal UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 6(2) ISSN 1073-2896 Author Bose, Erica Publication Date 1999 DOI 10.5070/LR862026987 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Three Brave Men: An Examinantion of Three Attorneys Who Represented the Hollywood Nineteen in the House Un- American Activities Committee Hearings in 1947 and the Consequences They Faced Erica Bose* I. INTRODUCTION On September 30, 1952 an attorney appeared before the House Subcommittee on Un-American Activities in Los Angeles as an extremely hostile witness. Ben Margolis, prominent labor lawyer and well-known radical, vehemently refused to answer nearly every question Chairman John S. Wood put forth to him. When asked if he knew Edward Dmytryk, one of the first "unfriendly witnesses" to appear before the House Un-American Activities Committee (H.U.A.C.) in Washington in 1947 who later recanted and named names, Margolis responded by stating, "Unfortunately he has become a member of your stable. I refuse to answer on the ground that it would tend to degrade me by association with any such person."' When "J.D. candidate, UCLA School of Law, 2001. I would like to express my sincere thanks to Ben Margolis, Patricia Bosworth, Ellenore Bogigian Hittelman, Ring Lardner, Jr., Ann Fagan Ginger, and Michael O'Malley. Without their help, I would never have been able to write this comment.
    [Show full text]
  • American Zionism and US Foreign Policy
    AMERICAN ZIONISM richard stevens AND U.S. FOREIGN POLICY 1942-1947 .*.*.* • ****** mHHlHi1 » , i “ ^ pjt£ . ****** / J\: * * * /1 '* ' , •■ ‘T'5? • • -r■ ' * THE INSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES AMERICAN ZIONISM and U.S. FOREIGN POLICY 1942—1947 by Richard P. Stevens, Ph. D. THE INSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES The Institute for Palestine Studies is an independent non-profit Arab research organization not affiliated to any government, political party, or group, devoted to a better understanding of the Palestine problem. Books in the Institute series are published in the interest of public information. They represent the free expression of their authors and do not necessarily indicate the judgement or opinions of the Institute. Copyright © 1962, by Richard P. Stevens First published by Pageant Press, Inc., New York Reprinted by special arrangement by the Institute for Palestine Studies. Copyright © 1970, by the Institute for Palestine Studies, Beirut REPRINT SERIES No. 7. THE INSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES Ashqar Bldg., Clemenceau Str., P.O.Box 7164, Beirut, Lebanon NOTE TO SECOND IMPRESSION At the request of the Institute for Palestine Studies the author has kindly given his permission for American Zionism and U.S. Foreign Policy (1942-1947) to be reprinted. To My Parents PREFACE The birth of the State of Israel on May 15, 1948, marked the climax of a vigorous campaign launched some six years earlier by world Zionism in the Biltmore Pro¬ gram. At the Biltmore Conference the Zionists had reason to proclaim openly their political intentions before the American public. Although political Zionism had long pursued the goal of a Jewish state, only the circumstances of modern history compelled the complete unveiling of Zionist intentions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reassessment of the Wickersham Commission Report: the Volute Ion of a Security Consensus Athan G
    Marquette Law Review Volume 96 Article 9 Issue 4 Symposium: Wickersham Commission A Reassessment of the Wickersham Commission Report: The volutE ion of a Security Consensus Athan G. Theoharis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Repository Citation Athan G. Theoharis, A Reassessment of the Wickersham Commission Report: The Evolution of a Security Consensus, 96 Marq. L. Rev. 1147 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol96/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 14 THEOHARIS (DO NOT DELETE) 6/23/2013 11:09 AM A REASSESSMENT OF THE WICKERSHAM COMMISSION REPORT: THE EVOLUTION OF A SECURITY CONSENSUS * ATHAN G. THEOHARIS The principal catalyst to the appointment of the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement (the so-called Wickersham Commission) in 1929 stemmed from a heightened public concern over the increase in crime and the attendant undermining of respect for the rule of law following the recent enactment of Prohibition. As such, with the public release of the Commission’s fourteen-volume report, critical scrutiny at the time centered on the Commission’s failure to offer a definitive assessment of the wisdom of Prohibition. In the process, the report’s broader findings and recommendations concerning policing practices commanded surprisingly limited attention. This Symposium proposes to remedy this neglect. Yet, as I shall argue in this Paper, there is a need to reassess the Commission’s core premise that changes in administrative procedures would solve the problems of ineffective law enforcement and abuses of power specifically by rationalizing decision making and promoting professionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Un-American Activities Committee Robert K
    Investigations in Operation: THE UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE ROBERT K. CARt HE PROGRAMS of most standing committees of Congress are largely determined for them by the number, kind and importance of bills referred to them for consideration. This has never been true of the Un-American Activities Committee. Its change in 1945 from a special investigating committee to a standing committee gave it a cer- tain measure of substantive jurisdiction over a particular legislative area," but it has never functioned primarily as a "legislative" committee. In- stead, it has been a curious congressional phenomenon-a permanent"in- vestigating" committee. In its own legislative area, it has had little work to perform.2 Rather, the Committee has had to devise a program of its t Parker Professor of Law and Political Science, Dartmouth College; Exec. Sec'y Presi- dent's Committee on Civil Rights (1947); author, Democracy and the Supreme Court (x936); The Supreme Court and Judicial Review (1942); Federal Protection of Civil Rights (1947). This study will be included in Prof. Carr's forthcoming book on the Un-American Activities Committee. x Title I of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, 6o Stat. 812 (3946), defines the powers and duties of the Committee in much the same language as the House Resolution which gave it perinanent status in 1945. According to the Act, "The Committee on Un-American Activities, as a whole or by subcommittee, is authorized to make from time to time investigations of (i) the extent, character, and objects of un-Ameri- can propaganda activities in the United States, (ii) the diffusion within the United States of subversive and un-American propaganda that is instigated from foreign countries or of a domestic origin and attacks the principle of the form of government as guaranteed by our Constitution, and (iii) all other questions in relation thereto that would aid Congress in any necessary remedial legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Patricia Bosworth Collection #1233
    The Inventory of the Patricia Bosworth Collection #1233 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center BOSTON UNIVERSITY Bosworth, Patricia / #1233 8/1/97 Preliminary Listing Box 1 I. Manuscripts. A. Re: ANYTHING YOUR LITTLE HEART DESIRES: AN AMERICAN FAMILY STORY, by PB. 1. Corrected galleys, 393p. 2. 7th draft, Nov. 1996, c.s., 410p. 3. Part I, rough draft 4. Part III, "rough, rough draft" 5. Original MS, rough draft, Summer 1990, t.s., 124p. 6. 4th draft, May 1995, c.s., p.1-158; p.382-747 (pages missing) 7. 3rd revision, May 1996, 524p., t.s. and c.s. with holo. corrections 8. Part III, 2nd draft, Jan. 1995 9. Parts I-II/Part III, rough draft 10. Part III, rough draft Box2 11. Revision, 3/28/96, 511 p. 12. Revised MS, June 12, 1996, 526p. 13. Parts IV-V, 6th draft 14. Part III, rough draft 15. Part III, original draft 16. Revision of Part I, rough Part III 17. Notes, early childhood, 1900-1916 18. Patt I, draft 19.· Rough draft/outline 20. Notes, Part III, 1947-1959 21. Notes, "The Book," 1990 22. Notes, Father's childhood, 1900-1916 23. Notes, Truman/Israel/Silva, 1945-47 24. Rough draft, March 1994 25. Part II, rough draft Box3 26. Revisions, Part III, March 16, 1994 27. Part II, rough draft 28. Part I, rough draft, Aug. 1989 29. Notes, Bartley Cavanaugh Crum's statements to FBI/State Dept. 30. Part I, rough draft, 1989 31. Part I, rough draft, Dec. 1988 32. Part 1, rough draft 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabb, Maxwell M.: Papers, 1938-1958, 1989
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS RABB, MAXWELL M.: PAPERS, 1938-1958, 1989 Accessions: A03-6; A03-6/1 Processed by: HP Date Completed: November 2007 The papers of Maxwell M. Rabb, counsel to the President and secretary to the Cabinet, were deposited in the Eisenhower Library in 2002 by Mrs. Ruth Rabb, his widow. Linear feet shelf space occupied: 24 Approximate number of pages: 47,200 Approximate number of items: 15,000 In May 2003 Mrs. Rabb executed a deed of gift for these papers. By agreement with the donor the following classes of documents will be withheld from research use: 1. Papers and other historical materials the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy of a living person. 2. Papers and other historical materials that are specifically authorized under criteria established by statute or Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy, and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such statute or Executive Order. [1] SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The Maxwell M. Rabb Papers document his early career as a lawyer and administrative assistant to Senator Henry Cabot Lodge as well as his role in the 1952 presidential campaign and the Eisenhower Administration. The papers have been divided into two series. The first one concerns his career from 1936 to 1952, and the second covers his service during the Eisenhower presidency, 1953-58. Rabb got involved in the Eisenhower for President campaign in late 1951 and worked full-time for the campaign in 1952. In January 1953 he joined the White House staff as aide to Sherman Adams and counsel to the President, and in 1954 he became secretary to the Cabinet, a position he held until he resigned in 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • 360-Review-1.2-Final.Pdf
    Energy, Agriculture, Finance, Culture & Faith on the Northern Great Plains SUMMER/FALL 2016 • VOLUME 1.2 • UNIVERSITY OF MARY 360 REVIEW magazine covers energy, agriculture, finance, culture and faith on the Northern Great Plains. 360 Review presents in-depth inquiry, analysis and reflection on important issues, trends and events happening in and affecting this region. There is a special focus on North Dakota, where we are located. More stories about surrounding states will published in future issues. “Magazine” derives from makhazin, the Arabic word for “storehouse,” which also soon gained military application as a “store for arms.” The world’s first print magazines began publication in England in the 18th century and sought to provide a storehouse of information and intellectual armament. 360 Review joins that tradition with the Christian, Catholic and Benedictine tradition of the University of Mary, which exists to serve the religious, academic and cultural needs of people in this region and beyond. As a poet once wrote: “The universe is composed of stories, not atoms.” 360 Review strives to tell some of these stories well—on paper (made of atoms, we presume), which is retro-innovative in a world spinning into cyberspace. There is also a digital version, available at: www.umary.edu/360. Publisher: University of Mary Editor-in-Chief: Patrick J. McCloskey Art Director & Photographer: Jerry Anderson Director of Print & Media Marketing: Tom Ackerman Illustrator: Tom Marple Research & Graphics Assistant: Matthew Charley Editorial Offices: University of Mary, 7500 University Drive, Bismarck, ND 58504 Signed articles express the views of their authors and are intended solely to inform and broaden public debate.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Lawyers Guild
    Union Calendar No. 1078 81st Congress, 2d Session House Report No. 3123 REPORT ON THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD Legal Bulwark of the Communist Party SEPTEMBER 17. 1950 (Orisinal release date) September 21, 1950.-Commirred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Prepared and Released by the COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES, U. S.HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WASHlNGTON. D. C. COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES EIGHTY-FIRST CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION JOHN S. WOOD, *Georgia, Chairman FRANCIS E. WALTER, Pennsylvania BURR P. HARRISON, Virginia JOHN MCSWEENEY, Ohio MORGAN M. MOULDER, Missouri RICHARD M. NIXON, California FRANCIS CASE, South Dakota HAROLD H. VELDE, Illinois BERNARD W. KEARNEY, New York * FRANK S. TAVENNER, Jr., Counsel LOUIS J. RUSSELL, Senior Investigator JOHN W. CARRINGTON, Clerk oj Committee BENJAMIN MANDEL, Director oj Research II Union Calendar No. 1078 SlST CONGRESS} HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES { REPORT 12d Session No. 3123 REPORT ON THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD-LEGAL BULWARK OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY SEPTEMBER 21, 1950.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. WOOD, from the Committee on Un-AmericanActivities, submitted the following REPORT [Pursuant to H. Res. 5, 79th Cong., 1st sess.] The National Lawyers Guild is the foremost legal bulwark of the Communist Party, its front organizations, and controlled unions. Since its inception it has never failed to rally to the legal defense of the Communist Party and individual members thereof, including known espionage agents. It has consistently fought against national, State, and local legislation aimed at curbing the Communist conspiracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Office the Bancrof T Library University Of
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancrof t Library Berkeley, California International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Oral History Series David Jenkins THE UNION MOVEMENT, THE CALIFORNIA LABOR SCHOOL, AND SAN FRANCISCO POLITICS, 1926-1988 With Introductions by Robert Schrank and Joseph L. Alioto Interviews Conducted by Lisa Rubens in 1987 and 1988 Copyright 0 1993 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a modern research technique involving an interviewee and an informed interviewer in spontaneous conversation. The taped record is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The resulting manuscript is typed in final form, indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Dave Jenkins dated March 17, 1992. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Roundtables, Vol. XIV, No. 14
    2013 H-Diplo Roundtable Editors: Thomas Maddux and Diane Labrosse H-Diplo Roundtable Review Roundtable Web/Production Editor: George Fujii www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables Commissioned for H-Diplo by Thomas Maddux Volume XIV, No. 14 (2013) 2 January 2013 (added missing italics Introduction by Christopher Endy and fixed punctuation issues in Alvah review on 22 July 2013) Andrew J. Falk. Upstaging the Cold War: American Dissent and Cultural Diplomacy, 1940- 1960. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2010, 2011. ISBN: 978-1-55849-728-3 (cloth, $34.95); 978-1-55849-903-4 (paper, $26.95). Stable URL: http://www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables/PDF/Roundtable-XIV-14.pdf Contents Introduction by Christopher Endy, California State University, Los Angeles ........................... 2 Review by Donna Alvah, St. Lawrence University .................................................................... 6 Review by Richard M. Fried, University of Illinois at Chicago................................................. 10 Review by Seth Offenbach, Bronx Community College, City University of New York ............ 16 Author’s Response by Andrew J. Falk, Christopher Newport University ............................... 18 Copyright © 2013 H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online. H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for non-profit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author(s), web location, date of publication, H-Diplo, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. For other uses, contact the H-Diplo editorial staff at [email protected]. H-Diplo Roundtable Reviews, Vol. XIV, No. 14 (2012) Introduction by Christopher Endy, California State University, Los Angeles id anti-communism really create a conformist mass media in post-1945 America? According to most textbooks, the period from 1945 to 1960 stands as the age of D Joseph McCarthy, when Americans embraced militant anti-communism and censored dissenting views.
    [Show full text]
  • Adrian Scott and the Politics of Ame
    Chapter 9 Americanism on Trial: HUAC, the Hollywood Ten, and the Politics of Anti-Communism In the depression, which our most conservative economists agree is coming, the soil for demagoguery grows rich and fertile. In this [climate], the liberal and progressive, the union man, the people, and anyone who subscribes to full democratic practice are liquidated. Today we see coming true what was said by one of the worst Americans, Huey Long: Fascism will come to America in the guise of Americanism. —Adrian Scott, notes for "You Can't Do That" In the summer of 1947, following the critical and popular success of Crossfire, 1 thirty-six-year-old Adrian Scott was at the peak of his Hollywood career. Though his creative prospects had never been brighter, Scott's mood, as he and other Hollywood progressives contemplated the postwar political scene, was increasingly bleak. In 1947, ominous portents, mirroring the dislocations that had fueled European fascism after World War One, were everywhere: fears of rising inflation and a return of the depression, concerns about the reintegration of war veterans, rising anti-Semitism and racism, and a flurry of antilabor legislation all suggested to them that America was on the road to fascism. Sweeping Republican victories in the 1946 elections, giving conservatives a majority in Congress, fueled significant challenges to the New Deal order—the defeat of the Economic Bill of Rights and passage of the antilabor Taft-Hartley Act, in particular—and exacerbated the emerging Cold War with the Soviet Union. Progressives
    [Show full text]
  • Son of President and Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt
    / FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT, JR August 17, 1914 - August 17, 1988 Fifth-born child of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt. Franklin, Jr., was born at Campobello Island, the Roosevelt's summer home. Following family custom, he graduated from Groton and Harvard (A.B . 1937), where he distinguished himself both in scholarship and athletics. He earned an LL.B. from the University of Virginia in 1940. Franklin, Jr., formed close relationships with both of his parents; within the family he was known as "Brother" or "Brud." He chose to study law after FDR's suggestion that a· few years' practice in a law firm would be good preparation for politics, and he was the first son to hold elected political office. Following his graduation from the University of Virginia, he worked on FDR's reelection campaign throughout the summer and fall of 1940, coordinating youth activities of the Democratic National Committee as well as those of various Roosevelt college clubs. He also entered law practice in New York in 1940, but his stay was short; in March 1941 he accepted active duty with the U.S. Navy. Before he was discharged in October 1945, he rose to the rank of lieutenant commander and earned several awards, including the PllIple Heart and a Silver Star. After the war, he returned to law practice in New York, joining the firm of Poletti, Diamond, Rabin, Freidin, and Mackay in November 1945; one year later he became a partner in the firm . He also embarked on his political career after the war, serving as chairman of housing activities for the American Veterans Committee (1945-47); as national vice-chairman of Americans for Democratic Action (1947), a nonpartisan organization of noncommunist liberals; and as vice-chairman of the President's Civil Rights Commission (1949) under Truman.
    [Show full text]