DOCSLIB.ORG

Tree Plantations in the Mekong Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tree Plantations in the Mekong Region Plantations in the mekong region: overview parts of the world, people have found the need to keep crossing “new frontiers”, trying to push beyond the current limits, to find a better life, to live off a better land. Except when forcibly displaced, the Mekong peoples WRM Briefing, December 2008 have rarely had a history of moving away because they have their own golden land. That may be the reason explaining why local people cannot understand the arrival of eager investors that rush into the area to exploit Eucalyptus, oil palm, rubber and jatropha monoculture plantations are their land to make their own wealth to take back home. expanding onto local communities’ lands and forests in the Mekong region’s countries. Promoted under the guise of development, poverty Private companies are aiming to take over 180,000 hectares in Laos and alleviation and even climate change mitigation, such plantations are over 800,000 hectares of land in Cambodia. Some of those companies are resulting in severe social and environmental impacts. In spite of the local, but most are international. The governments of the lower Mekong difficult political scenarios in which they are established, local peoples are countries award concessions to companies whose main aim is to grab the resisting through whichever means are available to them, ranging from largest possible piece of land, and later on to introduce large-scale broad alliances against plantations (such as inThailand) to nascent clusters plantations. The first time the plantation may fail, but this doesn’t matter, of local resistance against plantations in Cambodia and Laos. The aim of as long as they own the large piece of land along the main road, paying this briefing is to provide a broad picture of the on-the-ground reality of very low land taxes, and having plenty of time to try planting again. plantations in the region’s six countries –Burma, Cambodia, China, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam- as a means of generating awareness on the issue Two of the biggest threats for the Mekong’s peoples and resources – large- and, more importantly, to assist in making local peoples’ voices heard. At scale plantations and hydropower dams – share many common the same time, we hope that this information will serve as a useful tool for characteristics, including those related to the role of the private sector, the strengthening resistance against these types of plantations, both within and lack of clear policies for making the process transparent and accountable outside the Mekong region. and lack of people’s participation. However, large-scale plantations have pushed ahead over the past 10-15 years and as a result many people have lost their land, even before they knew if they had any legal right over the - No more frontiers to cross: Life of Mekong people in the land at all. The promotion of those schemes has made the gap between plantation era people and policy makers wider, and people still have no chance to make their own voices heard in decisions about their future on their own land. Welcome to the Mekong region! Sharing a linguistic heritage, the same Taking the land away from people means taking away their rice, their ancient word is still used across the region, particularly in Laos, Thailand crops and their families’ food security. This can turn out to be a disaster and Cambodia, to describe this place as “suvarnabhumi”, a golden land. for the countries in many senses, if an urgent reconsideration of these With tremendous natural resources from their rivers, forests and lands, policies is not achieved in time. people of the Mekong were seen as more than wealthy, as most of the people live by their capacity to work together with nature. While rivers As all the Mekong countries – Burma, Cambodia, China, Laos, Thailand, and forests are places to hunt, fish and gather, the land is gold in itself, and Vietnam – are presently providing soils for large scale plantations producing rice, a variety of crops and providing a home. While in other including rubber, eucalyptus, jatropha and palm oil, at the same time investors from within the region are also playing a power game over the lives in their own land that they have been using for generations. That is to less strong countries. Chinese, Thai and Vietnamese companies and their say, they wish to stay in their “Suvarnabhumi”, their golden land. state enterprises are now rushing in to push beyond their frontiers to satisfy their own industrial needs in neighboring countries such as Premrudee Daoroung – Director, TERRA Cambodia and Laos. Over the past decade, the struggle to monitor and campaign on plantation - Mono-crop trees find more room over the borders in the issues in the region has had little success. However, the emergence of the Mekong region land network and their campaign on land concessions in Cambodia, for instance, has resulted in increased awareness within society as a whole. In The inter-meshing of the six economies in the Mekong Basin since the spite of that, plantation proponents keep advertising large-scale plantations 1990s has been fostered under the Greater Mekong Sub-region economic using endless and ever more complicated reasons, ranging from ‘shifting cooperation programme. This was aimed at increasing the flow of cross- cultivation stabilization’ and ‘poverty reduction’ 20 years ago, to border investment from countries with considerable economic might such plantations now aimed at carbon credits and biofuel production. as China, Thailand and Vietnam into neighbouring countries such as Laos Throughout the years, the reasons given to the local people have kept PDR and Cambodia, which have a ‘doors wide open’ approach calling for changing, but something that has not changed is that people of the Mekong foreign companies to come to invest. Extensive land and cheap labour countries have continued to be pushed to the frontiers of their own land. have been used as an incentive for drawing in investors to develop commercial tree plantations in the form of hundreds of large-scale land In November 2006, a statement of unity came out from a Mekong concessions in the period of the last 4-5 years. Regional Conference on Tree Plantations, held in Kratie province, Cambodia where people from five Mekong countries shared their We can distinguish four forms of investment in monoculture tree experiences and the lessons they had learned on the issue of industrial tree plantations in the Mekong: investment of foreign capital from outside the plantations and their impacts on local peoples' livelihoods. The people Mekong region, cross-border investment of capital from within the stated that “Contrary to government claims that plantations contribute to Mekong region, domestic investment by major capital groups, and national economic development and poverty alleviation, plantations have household investment by small-holder farmers on their own land. In this increased poverty by displacing entire communities, destroying crucial article we will emphasise the first two types, since these tend to involve livelihood resources and preventing the access of communities to natural the greatest concentration of land use and have brought the most serious resources”. Their conclusion was that “In all cases the only way to create impacts for local communities. We can identify the main actors in the change has been through peoples' struggles. Struggle does not mean different countries as follows. violence; it means the different ways that local people adopt to secure and defend their rights”. Laos Investments in plantations in Laos are mostly in the form of large-scale In order to avoid having to move away and to change their lives, people in state land concessions, particularly for growing eucalyptus and rubber. the Mekong region now need to turn around and state clearly to the These draw on investment from countries outside as well as within the plantation proponents that there are no more new frontiers for the Mekong region. Major investing companies include Oji from Japan, with companies to cross. Instead, the people wish to remain and regain their extensive plantations underway and seeking a total of 50,000 ha of eucalyptus in Bolikhamxay and Khammouane provinces. Another is Birla Laos (Birla Grasim) from India who have a concession of 30,000 ha to Cambodia grow eucalyptus in Savannakhet province. Actors within the region The extent of land alienation in Cambodia is much greater. Information include the Vietnamese rubber companies, Viet-Lao, DacLac and Dau from the Council of Ministers in February 2003 specified that the Tieng, which have agreements to invest in rubber over an area of more government of Cambodia authorized 40 economic concessions covering an than 30,000 ha in the southern part of Laos or Champassak and Salavane area of 809,296 ha. Since then, official figures have been hard to come by, provinces. Reports indicate that, in total, Vietnamese companies are but recent reports indicate that during the global economic boom since the seeking to expand rubber investments in Laos to 100,000 ha within the turn of the century up to half the land area of the country had been next twelve years. The two largest pulp companies in Thailand, Advance assigned to foreign investors either through land concessions or long Agro and Phoenix Pulp and Paper, are also seeking to use Laos’s land to leases. grow eucalyptus as a raw material to supply their factories back in Thailand. The major investors in Cambodia tend to have strong links with senior politicians in government. The law states that economic land concessions So far, the Lao government has authorized an area of around 167,000 ha to cannot extend beyond 10,000 ha, and that larger pre-existing concessions foreign companies to invest in monoculture economic trees and crops must be reduced accordingly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • F-REDD Newsletter April
    Quarterly Vol.10 April - June 2018 F-REDD Newsletter Sustainable Forest Management and REDD+ Support Project Nov 2015 - Oct 2020 Sustainable Forest Management and REDD+ Support Project (F-REDD) The purpose of F-REDD is to enhance the capacity of forestry sector through strengthening policies, effective incorpora- tion of REDD+, and improvement of forest resource information as the foundation of sustainable forest management (SFM) in both central and provincial levels (Luang Prabang and Oudomxay). The Department of Forestry, Ministry of Agri- culture and Forestry (MAF-DOF) is the implementing agencies of F-REDD. ERPD approved by FCPF-CF This is an update on a topic discussed in previous issues*1. F-REDD has been providing support for Lao PDR’s preparation of an Emission Reduction Program Document (ERPD) for submission to the Forest Car- bon Partnership Facility’s Carbon Fund (FCPF-CF). Lao PDR’s ERPD has now been reviewed and approved at the FCPF-CF’s 18th meeting (held in Paris in June). This will make it possible to sell carbon credits to be produced as the result of implementing the REDD+ activities in six northern provinces during 2019-2025. After submitting the final draft of the ERPD in May, FCPF prepared a Technical Assessment Report*2. Led by the vice minister of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, a team of representatives from Lao PDR The Laos representative team participating in attended this important meeting, which included a presentation of the the 18th FCPF-CF meeting in Paris ERPD, a question and answer session, and the final decision on approval.
    [Show full text]
  • CROSSROADS the Illicit Timber Trade Between Laos and Vietnam ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS This Document Was Produced with the Financial Assistance of the European Union
    CROSSROADS The Illicit Timber Trade Between Laos and Vietnam ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents are the sole responsibility of EIA and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. 1 INTRODUCTION 2 THE THREATENED FORESTS OF LAOS EIA thanks the Adessium Foundation for its support 6 VIETNAM'S BURGEONING TIMBER INDUSTRY of our work on environmental crime. This report was written and edited by the Environmental Investigation Agency 8 INSIDE THE ILLICIT CROSS-BORDER LOG TRADE Report design by: www.designsolutions.me.uk 16 ONWARD DESTINATIONS Many thanks to Emmerson Press for the printing of this report (Emmerson Press: +44 (0)1926 854400) July 2011 18 INTERNATIONAL FOREST GOVERNANCE POLICIES 20 RECOMMENDATIONS CHINA VIETNAM Hanoi LAOS Vientiane THAILAND Sekong town Attapeu town Qui Nhon CAMBODIA ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY (EIA) 62/63 Upper Street, London N1 0NY, UK Tel: +44 (0) 20 7354 7960 Ho Chi Minh City Fax: +44 (0) 20 7354 7961 email: [email protected] www.eia-international.org DOUBLE MEANING: FRONT COVER: dong: Vietnam - unit of currency, money Trucks carrying Laos logs, Pleikan, Vietnam, 2010 dong: Laos - forest © EIA INTRODUCTION © EIA Dusk is gathering at a remote forest Phonesack Vilaysack, who sells logs to ABOVE: inspection checkpoint in Attapeu, deepest Vietnamese buyers for hard cash while his Lao logs cut by a Vietnamese southern Laos, in February 2011. The own wooden flooring factory in Laos cannot military company, Vinh, Vietnam border lies a few kilometres supply orders due to a lack of raw material.
    [Show full text]
  • Displacements and Hmong Transnational Politics, 1975-2010
    Dreaming of Home, Dreaming of Land: Displacements and Hmong Transnational Politics, 1975-2010 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Her Vang IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Erika Lee, Advisor July 2010 © Her Vang 2010 All rights reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In 1933, the Lakota author Luther Standing Bear suggested that written history was second best to oral tradition because “a people enrich their minds who keep their history on the leaves of memory.”1 For much of their history, the Hmong also stored their past not in books but on “the leaves of their memory,” and they passed down their history orally from one generation to the next. Parents in Euro-America read to their children to put them to sleep, but Hmong children traditionally fell asleep listening to their parents tell Hmong folklores and their own family history. Storytelling and history- telling were important parts of traditional Hmong culture and livelihood. A Hmong child who learned the most Hmong folklores and knew the most about the family’s history often grew up to become the leader of the family and the clan. Today, the keeper of the family’s past is still the leader of the family and the clan. A Hmong leader knows all the secrets of his family and clan, and he is responsible for resolving all disputes involving his family and clan. Despite this significance, history, I admit, has not always been my chosen field of academic inquiry. First, I previously had no strong motivation to do written history because written history, for the Hmong, was secondary to their oral tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND RIGHTS of INDIGENOUS PEOPLES in SOUTH-EAST ASIA Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples in South-East Asia ALEXANDRA XANTHAKI*
    LAND RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN SOUTH-EAST ASIA Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples in South-East Asia ALEXANDRA XANTHAKI* [Very little has been written on indigenous rights in South-East Asia. This article attempts to address issues concerning indigenous land rights in the region, arguing that there is a clear gap between the existing situation and the relevant standards of the international human rights system. After a short overview of the international human rights framework currently binding South-East Asian states, the article analyses issues of indigenous land ownership and control by indigenous peoples over matters affecting their land rights. The article then discusses traditional economic activities, natural resources, indigenous environmental management and finally to issues of relocation and compensation. In each of the aforementioned areas, indigenous land rights are generally non-existent or very weak. Even on occasions when national legislation has recognised strong indigenous land rights, the lack of political motivation to properly enforce these rights impedes their full realisation. The article demonstrates that this inadequacy is inconsistent with international standards on the prohibition of discrimination, protection of minority cultures and more specifically on indigenous land rights, as are recognised in international instruments, interpreted by international bodies and transferred into national practices.] CONTENTS I Introduction II The General Framework III Collective Ownership and Possession IV Consultation and Participation V Traditional Activities and Natural Resources VI Relocation VII Restitution and Compensation VIII Conclusions I INTRODUCTION Recent reports suggest that indigenous peoples in South-East Asia face serious problems, some of which endanger their very survival in a rapidly changing environment.1 Despite the gravity of the indigenous peoples’ situation, indigenous rights in South-East Asia have attracted relatively little interest from the international legal community.
    [Show full text]
  • Hmong Ruhi Hamid 020905 En.Pdf
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B - POLICY DEPARTMENT - STUDY "The Human Rights Situation in Laos with Particular Emphasis on the Situation of the Hmong People" Abstract: The Hmong people of Southeast Asia are believed to have originated in China, and some scholars argue that their customs preserve many elements of an ancient civilisation from an area that is now China. The expansion of the Han Chinese people forced the resisting Hmong and other indigenous minorities to flee southwards into the northern areas of present-day Laos, Vietnam and Thailand, early in the nineteenth century. Due to a constant cycle of rebellions and brutal reprisals, this process continued for several decades DGExPo/B/PolDep/Note/2005_ 08 02/09/2005 [PE N°] EN This note was requested by the European Parliament's subcommittee on Human Rights. This paper is published in the following languages: English Author: Ruhi Hamid Manuscript completed in September 2005. Copies can be obtained through: E-mail: [email protected] Brussels, European Parliament, 01/09/2005 The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. 2 The forgotten Hmong hiding in the jungles of Laos By Ruhi Hamid, Documentary Filmmaker 1st September 2005 1.0 History The Hmong people of Southeast Asia are believed to have originated in China, and some scholars argue that their customs preserve many elements of an ancient civilisation from an area that is now China. The expansion of the Han Chinese people forced the resisting Hmong and other indigenous minorities to flee southwards into the northern areas of present-day Laos, Vietnam and Thailand, early in the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Forest Management in Laos
    SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN LAOS Tomoya MORI1 Laos (Lao People’s Democratic Republic) has the problem of deforestation and forest degradation. One of the reasons is on shifting cultivation in short term. The increasing of the population puts a pressure on an agricultural sector. Local people cannot help performing a shifting cultivation in short term, although they had traditionally done long term. This problem is similar with ‘the tragedy of commons’, suggested by G. Hardin (1968). The Lao’s government implements the forestry policy, ‘Land Forest Allocation Program’. This policy is to define clearly the boundary and classification of land in the basis of the land-use of local communities. And, the main function of LFAP is to regard local community as forest manager and allow them to practice customary rights to utilize forest without a shifting cultivation in forestry law, that is, to adopt the approach for local community to participate in managing forest. This paper made clear that LFAP turns a shifting cultivation from sustainable method to unsustainable one. And, it made clear that community-governance plays a role as sustainable forest management in LFAP. First, it was turned that deforestation was related with the change in land-use in the basis of statistic data in LADA. Second, this problem is approached in terms of the Ostrom’s theory, the analysis of economics. Third, on field survey in Louangphabang prefecture, it is turned that the system in village is consistence with the Ostrom’s theory. 1. The change in land-use and deforestation in Laos Lao People’s Democratic Republic (in the following, it is called Laos) is surrounded by Vietnam, China, Myanmar, Thailand and Cambodia, and is the only landlocked country among them.
    [Show full text]
  • REDD+ As a Tool for State Territorialization: Managing Forests and People in Laos
    REDD+ as a tool for state territorialization: managing forests and people in Laos Sabaheta Ramcilovic-Suominen1 Natural Resources Institute Finland, Finland University of Eastern Finland, Finland Abstract This article analyzes the Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) policy process, through the lens of state territorialization in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos). It explores the motivations, mechanisms and strategies that drive REDD+ policy design and its implementation in the country. The provinces selected for REDD+ activities within the Emission Reduction (ER) Program, as well as the various REDD+ pilot projects are located in the north, where shifting cultivation is widespread, but where the potential for REDD+ to address deforestation and carbon sequestration is not optimal. The provinces with high carbon sequestration potential and high rates of deforestation are not part of the ER Program due to development investment projects and political sensitivity in those areas. REDD+ acts as a tool for state territorialization in a number of ways, including: (i) by targeting the areas where shifting cultivation is widely practiced, aiming to regulate village forest uses and users, (ii) by protecting state political, economic and development goals and strategies, (iii) by leaving the profitable large-scale drivers of deforestation unaddressed, including large-scale land investments, hydropower, infrastructure and mining development, and finally (iv) by providing additional motives, tools and discourses for state territorialization, including funding, technologies and the narratives that support it. I highlight, however, that REDD+ is not the sole reason for state territorial politics and practices. Rather, the instrument is layered over previous histories of colonial and post- colonial territorialization processes, continuing a similar logic, rhetoric and management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • PLR Gap Analysis Laos
    SUMMARY REPORT Policy, Laws and Regulations and the UNFCCC Cancun Safeguards: Frameworks and Gaps in the Lao PDR June 2015 Dr. Rita Gebert Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany Climate Protection through Avoided Deforestation (CliPAD) Department of Forest Resource Management, Thongkhankham Village, Chanthabuly District, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR P.O.Box 1295 T +856 21 254 082 F +856 21 243 083 I www.giz.de As at June 2015 Text Dr. Rita Gebert GIZ is responsible for the content of this publication On behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) i Acknowledgements I wish to acknowledge the support for this study from the Forest Governance Programme in GIZ Headquarters that commissioned this study, from Dr. Jens Kallabinski, CTA of the project Climate Protection through Avoided Deforestation (CliPAD), from Dr. Sebastian Koch and from Mr. Thongsoune Bounphasaisol also at CliPAD. I wish to acknowledge the assistance of the many interlocutors who participated in this study. Many thanks especially to forestry sector colleagues in Vientiane who shared thoughts and PLRs with me! I am grateful to the GIZ-supported Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) project for providing an extensive collection of forestry-related PLRs. The author is also grateful to SUFORD colleagues Edwin Payuan and Jukka-Pekka Tolvanen for sharing insights on PLRs pertaining to village forestry and community land titling. The final responsibility for opinions expressed in the report lies with the author, Dr. Rita Gebert. They do not necessarily represent the opinions of GIZ or of any member of the Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest for All Forever
    Centralized National Risk Assessment for Lao People´s Democratic Republic FSC-CNRA-LA V1-0 EN FSC -CNRA-LA V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-LA V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR LAO PEOPLE´S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 2017 – 1 of 264 – Centralized National Risk Assessment for Lao Title: People´s Democratic Republic Document reference FSC-CNRA-LA V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Policy and Standards Unit Date of approval: 15 December 2017 Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Policy and Standards Unit - Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2017 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non- government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-LA V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR LAO PEOPLE´S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 2017 – 2 of 264 – Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Lao People´s Democratic Republic ..
    [Show full text]
  • In Laos, Log and Sawnwood Export Ban Implementation Appears
    In Laos, Log and Sawnwood Export Ban Implementation Appears Successful Trade data show recent policies are successfully curbing the timber export boom, with large impacts on trade with Vietnam and China 26 April 2017 | WASHINGTON, D.C. | Decisive actions taken by the government of Laos, in the form of a Notice (no. 1360 in August 2015) and a Prime Ministerial Order (PM15 in May 2016) prohibiting the export of logs and lightly processed “sawnwood,” appear to be paying off, according to a new analysis by the Washington, D.C.-based organization Forest Trends. The report points to a precipitous decline in the volume of raw logs and lightly processed “sawnwood” being exported from Laos to its primary consumer markets as evidence of this success. Exports to China and Vietnam – which together import the vast majority of Lao timber – fell nearly 75 percent from 2014 to 2016, thanks in large part to this two-part government crackdown on exports. The dramatic decline in exports followed exponential growth in recent years, with volumes peaking in 2014. Forest Trends analyzed import statistics sourced directly from Vietnam and China Customs over a seven- year period. The report authors contend that these findings signal progress towards more effective enforcement of laws and regulations designed to protect Laos’ valuable natural resources and promote econonmic development. Figure 1: Vietnam and China’s Imports of Lao Logs and Sawnwood by Volume, 2010-2016 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 ) 3 1,000,000 800,000 Volume (m 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Logs (China) Logs (Vietnam) Sawnwood (China) Sawnwood (Vietnam) Source: Vietnam Customs and China Customs statistics, compiled by Forest Trends.
    [Show full text]
  • The People and Their River
    The People and Their River A Survey of River-Based Livelihoods in the Xe Bang Fai River Basin in Central Lao PDR By Bruce Shoemaker, Ian G. Baird and Monsiri Baird Lao PDR/Canada Fund for Local Initiatives Vientiane, Lao PDR 15 November 2001 Table of Contents Executive Summary - Lao Language (available in hardcopy book) - English Language ..........................................................................................................i Map Introduction and Background ...................................................................................................... 1 - Methodology ................................................................................................................ 1 The Xe Bang Fai River Basin and the Survey Area ................................................................... 3 The Ebb and Flow of the Xe Bang Fai River .............................................................................. 5 The People of the Xe Bang Fai Basin .......................................................................................... 6 River-based Livelihoods................................................................................................................. 9 1. Fisheries ........................................................................................................................ 9 - Fish Migrations and River Fisheries ...................................................................... 9 - Fishing Methods .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    HOW LAOS IS MOVING FORWARD WITH REDD+ SCHEMES Khamla Phanvilay Faculty of Forestry National University of Laos Sithong Thongmanivong Faculty of Forestry National University of Laos Thoumthone Vongvisouk Department of Geoscience & Natural Resource Management Faculty of Science University of Copenhagen The forest cover in Laos has decreased over the past three decades for variety of rea- sons. The current Laos Government has committed itself to restoring the forest cover to 70 per cent by 2020. As a result, many conservation projects and programs have been planned and implemented in different parts of the country. REDD+ was intro- duced in late 2007; however, progress of implementation of REDD+ has been slow. This paper examines and updates the status of REDD+ implementation in Laos, using information from literature and interviews with relevant individuals. The paper re- veals that progress of REDD+ is slow not only due to external factors but also on internal factors. Currently, there are various international organisations and NGOs, from both the public and private sectors, attempting to pilot REDD+ projects. Laos faces many challenges in implementing REDD+, including institutional arrangements; appropriate methods for carbon accounting, reporting and verification; benefit shar- ing; and engaging local communities. Introduction Laos is one of the few countries in Southeast Asia that still has close to 50 per cent of its land under forests. In the 1960s, the country’s forests covered 70 per cent of Laos’ land area. By 2010, this cover had declined to 41 per cent.1 There are various drivers of forest cover loss in Laos, including infrastructure development, hydro- power development and the conversion of forests to cash crops and industrial tree plantations.
    [Show full text]