DOCSLIB.ORG

Millstone River Watershed Flood Damage and Mitigation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Millstone River Watershed Flood Damage and Mitigation Report Millstone River Watershed Flood Damage and Mitigation Analysis Report Hurricane Floyd Flooding, September 17, 1999 Griggstown Causeway Looking Toward the Millstone River with Muletenders’ Barracks on right USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Assisting Hunterdon County Mercer County Middlesex County Monmouth County Somerset County and Respective Soil Conservation Districts December 2004 USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service 220 Davidson Ave. 4th Floor, Somerset NJ 08873 (732) 537-6040 http://www.nj.nrcs.usda.gov/ Mission Statement The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people to conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment. 2 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Millstone River Watershed Flood Damage and Mitigation Analysis Report December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Photos.................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 WATERSHED SETTING................................................................................................................................................................. 9 HISTORY OF FLOODING............................................................................................................................................................. 25 PREVIOUS STUDIES ..................................................................................................................................................................... 29 HISTORY OF THIS STUDY.......................................................................................................................................................... 30 Public Participation.................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Methodology of Study ............................................................................................................................................................. 33 PHASE 1 – WATERSHED – WIDE ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................... 33 Municipal Interviews................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Federal Emergency Management Agency National Flood Insurance Claims .................................................................. 53 Flood Damage Priority Study Areas ....................................................................................................................................... 58 Agricultural Issues .................................................................................................................................................................... 58 PHASE 2 – MILLSTONE MAINSTEM ANALYSIS................................................................................................................. 63 Study Area.................................................................................................................................................................................. 63 Methodology for Flood Damage Evaluation......................................................................................................................... 63 Hydrology and Hydraulics .................................................................................................................................................. 63 Structure Elevation Survey.................................................................................................................................................. 64 Economic ................................................................................................................................................................................ 65 Minimum Standards to be Met for Flood Protection....................................................................................................... 69 PHASE 3 – MILLSTONE BOROUGH ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................... 81 Structural Measure .................................................................................................................................................................... 81 Floodwall ................................................................................................................................................................................ 81 Nonstructural Measures ........................................................................................................................................................... 85 Elevation................................................................................................................................................................................. 85 Flood Proofing....................................................................................................................................................................... 85 Relocation............................................................................................................................................................................... 85 Buyout .................................................................................................................................................................................... 86 Enhancement and Expansion of Existing Flood Warning System................................................................................. 86 No Action Alternative.......................................................................................................................................................... 89 HARRYS BROOK........................................................................................................................................................................... 89 Conclusions and Recommendations........................................................................................................................................... 92 Conclusions................................................................................................................................................................................ 92 Recommendations...................................................................................................................................................................... 93 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................................................................. 97 APPENDICES................................................................................................................................................................................ 101 APPENDIX A - Millstone River Watershed (PL 566) Public Participation Plan............................................................. 103 APPENDIX B - Summary of Millstone River Watershed Public Meeting December 6, 2000....................................... 107 APPENDIX C - Notes from March 22, 200l Public Meeting in Montgomery Township............................................... 113 APPENDIX D - September 18, 2001 Public Meeting in Franklin Township .................................................................... 119 APPENDIX E – Figure 8 - Municipal Interview-Reported Flood Damages .................................................................... 125 APPENDIX F – Summary of Hydraulics Analysis .............................................................................................................. 129 APPENDIX G - Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes September 26, 2001 ............................................................... 131 3 USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service Millstone River Watershed Flood Damage and Mitigation Analysis Report December 2004 List of Tables Table 1 - Present Land Use........................................................................................................................................................... 21 Table 2 – Past, Present and Projected Population*
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2002 Integrated List of Waterbodies
    Appendix IA State of New Jersey's Sublist 1 2002 Integrated List of Waterbodies Phosphorus,Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, TSS, Unionized Coast 15 Absecon Creek S Br near Pomona 01410455 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Albertson Br near Elm 0140940970 Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Unionized Ammonia USGS/Pinelands Data Phosphorus,Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, NJDEP/USGS Data, Metal Northwest 11 AssunpInk Creek near Clarksville 01463620, 11-AS-2 TSS, Unionized Ammonia Recon Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Coast 15 Babcock Creek near Mays LandIng 01411196 TSS, Unionized Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Temperature, Nitrate, Unionized Raritan 09 Barclay Brook near Englishtown 01405285 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, TSS, Unionized Coast 14 Bass River E Br near New Gretna 01410150 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, NJDEP/USGS Data, Metal Coast 14 Batsto River at Batsto 01409500, 14-BAT-1 TSS, Unionized Ammonia, Chromium, Zinc Recon Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Batsto River at Hampton Furnace 01409432 Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Unionized Ammonia USGS/Pinelands Data Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Batsto River at Quaker Bridge 01409470
    [Show full text]
  • The Secretary of War
    71ST CONoESS COM rITZrEON RIVERS AND HARBORS, DocumENTr ,?d Session I HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES No. 53 RARITAN RIVER, N. J. LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY OF WAR REPORT FROM THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS ON RARITAN RIVER, N. J., COVERING NAVIGATION, FLOOD CONTROL, POWER DEVEL- OPMENT, AND IRRIGATION JANUARY 0, 1930.-Referred to tho Committee on Rivers and Harbors WAR DEPARTMENT, Washington, December 27, 1929. The SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. DEAR MR. SPEAKER: I am transmitting herewith a report dated December 26, 1929, from the Chief of Engineers United States Army, on Raritan River, N. J., submitted under the provisions of House Doctment No. 308, Sixty-ninth Congress, first session, which was enacted into law, with modifications, in section I of the river and harbor act of January 21, 1927, with accompanying papers. Sincerely yours, PATRICK J. tURLEY, Secretary of War. WAR DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, Wa8hington, December 26,1929. Subject: Report on Raritan River, N. J. To: The Secretary of War. 1. I submit, for transmission to Congress, my report, with accom. panyin papers, on Raritan River, N. J, submitted under the provi- sions OfHouse Document No. 308, Sixty-ninth Congress, first lesson, which was enacted into law, with modifications, in section s of the river and harbor act of January 21, 1927. 1572-R. and H. Doe. 53, 71-2-1 2 . ABTAX RIVR, i. IT. 2. The Raritan River rises in the north-central part of New Jersey and flows in a southeasterly direction 30 miles into Raritan Bay. The drainage area of 1,105 square miles contains several small cities and is largely devoted to agriculture and manufacturing.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Jersey Transportation Forum Planned Projects Status Report
    CENTRAL JERSEY TRANSPORTATION FORUM PLANNED PROJECTS STATUS REPORT Summer, 2004 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission CJTF - Planned Projects Status Report I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction II. Highway TIP Projects Alexander Road Bridge over Amtrak ............................ 5 CR 514 Amwell Road Bridge over Neshanic River ................. 6 CR 514 Amwell Road Railroad Bridge ........................... 7 CR 518 Bedens Brook Bridge ................................. 8 CR 546 Washington Crossing-Pennington Road Bridge ............. 9 CR 546 Washington Crossing-Pennington Road Bridge over Conrail .. 10 Elm Street Bridge .......................................... 11 Hutchinson Trail, Washington Township ........................ 12 I-195 Rehabilitation, West of Richardson Road to Exit 8 ............ 13 I-287 Raritan River Crossing Needs Analysis .................... 14 I-295 Rehabilitation, I-195 to Route 1 .......................... 15 NJ 27 Renaissance 2000, Bennetts Lane to Somerset Street ........ 16 NJ 27 Six Mile Run Bridge ................................... 17 NJ 29 Baldpate Mountain Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvement ......... 18 NJ 29 Guiderail ........................................... 19 NJ 29 Rockfall Mitigation .................................... 20 NJ 29 Washington Crossing State Park, Scenic Byway ............ 21 NJ 31 Ewingville/Upper Ferry Road to CR 518 TDD Project ......... 22 NJ 33 Bentley Brook ....................................... 23 NJ 33 Conrail Bridge Replacement ............................ 24 NJ 33
    [Show full text]
  • MILLSTONE RIVER WATERSHED Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention (PL-566) Locally-Led Planning and Implementation Effort
    MILLSTONE RIVER WATERSHED Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention (PL-566) Locally-Led Planning and Implementation Effort (NJ map with Millstone Watershed highlighted) SPONSORS: Hunterdon County Mercer County Middlesex County Monmouth County Somerset County Freehold Soil Conservation District Hunterdon Soil Conservation District Mercer County Soil Conservation District Somerset-Union Soil Conservation District NJ State Soil Conservation Committee NJ Water Supply Authority USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service What is a watershed? A watershed is the land area that water flows across before draining to a common stream, lake, river, bay or ocean. Watersheds naturally cross municipal and county boundaries. How does this relate to the Millstone River Watershed? The Millstone River Watershed is located in central New Jersey. The watershed is 184,320 acres in size. It straddles two major physiographic provinces, namely the Piedmont Plateau and the Inner Coastal Plain. The watershed is made up of portions of Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth and Somerset counties. Within this area are parts or all of 26 municipalities, including the following incorporated municipalities: the boroughs of Manville, Millstone, Franklin, Hillsborough, Hightstown and Mont- gomery, and the townships of Plainsboro and Princeton; historic communities along the river corridor include Zarephath, Blackwells Mills, Griggstown and Kingston. It includes the Route 1 corridor from Lawrence to North Brunswick Townships. Land and water management in one part of the watershed can have direct and indirect impacts on water quantity and quality in downstream areas of the watershed. Why is the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) working with governing body officials, citizens and other individuals in the Millstone River Watershed? NRCS works with other Federal, State, and local agencies, units of government and local organizations to provide help requested at the local level.
    [Show full text]
  • Township of Plainsboro Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Appendix 18: Township of Plainsboro Preliminary Draft - November 2015 Appendix 18: Township of Plainsboro The Township of Plainsboro participated in the 2015 Middlesex County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update. This appendix includes the locally-specific information about the Township. The following sections detail the planning process and participants; the current population, building stock, and land development trends; hazards that are specific to the Township and corresponding risk assessments; the Township’s mitigation strategy, and a local capability assessment. 1. Plan Development On March 11, 2015, the Mayor signed an “Intent to Participate” letter and the Township Committee passed a resolution. The Mayor assigned the OEM Coordinator to work with other municipal employees, consultants, volunteers, and other stakeholders through the formation of a Local Planning Committee, as listed below. The local planning committee filled out the municipal worksheets included in Appendix E and worked to gather the necessary information to support the plan update. Members of the LPC attended the Coordinator’s Meetings in April and June, the project kick-off meeting in April, and met with the planning consultant on June 25th. The LPC reviewed all drafts of this appendix prior to adoption. Table 18-1: Township of Plainsboro Local Planning Committee Members Name Title Organization Kevin Schroeck Patrol/OEM Plainsboro PD Eamon Blanchard Sergeant Plainsboro PD Brian Wagner Fire Chief Plainsboro VFD Brian Gould EMS Chief Plainsboro EMS Neil Blitz Director Plainsboro DPW Brian Miller Director Plainsboro Building Les Varga Director Plainsboro Planning/Zoning Anthony Cancro Township Administrator Plainsboro Township Middlesex County, New Jersey: 2015 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 18-1 Appendix 18: Township of Plainsboro Preliminary Draft - November 2015 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resources Inventory for the Township and Borough of Princeton
    PRINCETON ERI The Delaware Valley Regional Planning The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a Commission is dedicated to uniting the stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The region’s elected officials, planning outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, professionals, and the public with the while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware common vision of making a great region River. The two adjoining crescents represent even greater. Shaping the way we live, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. work, and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding promoting smart growth, protecting the sources, including federal grants from the environment, and enhancing the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) economy. We serve a diverse region of and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Montgomery, and Philadelphia in departments of transportation, as well Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, as by DVRPC’s state and local member Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. governments. This ERI was also funded by ANJEC’s Smart Growth Assistance Program, DVRPC is the federally designated supported by the Geraldine R. Dodge Metropolitan Planning Organization for Foundation. The authors, however, are solely the Greater Philadelphia Region— responsible for the findings and conclusions leading the way to a better future. herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS in the JACOBS CREEK, STONY BROOK, and BEDEN BROOK DRAINAGE BASINS, WEST-CENTRAL NEW JERSEY, 1986-88 By
    HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS IN THE JACOBS CREEK, STONY BROOK, AND BEDEN BROOK DRAINAGE BASINS, WEST-CENTRAL NEW JERSEY, 1986-88 By Eric Jacobsen, Mark A. Hardy, and Barbara A. Kurtz U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4164 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY West Trenton, New Jersey 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Mountain View Office Park Box 25425 Suite 206 Federal Center 810 Bear Tavern Road Denver, CO 80225 West Trenton, NJ 08628 CONTENTS Page Abstract.............................................................. 1 Introduction.......................................................... 2 Purpose and scope................................................ 2 Previous studies................................................. 2 Acknowledgments.................................................. 2 Description of study area............................................. 4 Location and setting............................................. 4 Climate.......................................................... 4 Geology.......................................................... 6 Hydrogeology..................................................... 6 Methods of investigation.............................................. 8 Ground
    [Show full text]
  • Streamwatcher Your Water
    The StreamWatcher Your water. Your environment. Winter 2013 Your voice. STREAMWATCH MISSION Protecting and enhancing our watershed through chemical, physical, and biological monitoring, restoration, appropriate action, and education. Volunteers are the key! IN THIS ISSUE . SCIENCE DEPARTMENT STAFF PAGE 1 Nationwide Water Quality Portal Now Online Jim Waltman SBMWA Executive Director PAGE 2 Announcements What’s Bugging You - How does road salting affect waterways? Amy M. Soli, Ph.D PAGE 3 What’s Bugging You, continued Science Director August and November Bacteria Monitoring Results Erin McCollum Stretz PAGE 4 Summer and Fall 2013 Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Results StreamWatch Program Coordinator PAGE 5 View Our Data Nicholas Ho Resources for StreamWatchers GIS Specialist Upcoming Dates to Remember ———————————————— NATIONWIDE WATER QUALITY PORTAL NOW ONLINE STONY BROOK-MILLSTONE SEE YOUR DATA ON A NATIONAL SCALE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION You have worked long and hard to collect your StreamWatch data—now what? J. Seward Johnson, Sr. There is a new website available to the public to see your data put on display. A Environmental Center project that has been in development for years by the National Water Quality 31 Titus Mill Road Council, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the US Geological Survey, the Pennington, NJ 08534 Water Quality Portal is now available online. Released last year, it provides “one- stop shopping” for access to water quality data collected across the country by Phone: (609) 737-3735 Fax: (609) 737-3075 national, state, and local government agencies, utilities, academia, and nonprofit www.thewatershed.org organizations—including the Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association! Rather than visiting multiple websites, you can find physical, chemical, and bio- For questions about how to get logical data all in one place.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserve Expands to 930 Acres
    VOL. 58, NO. 3 Fall 2011 A publication of the Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association, central New Jersey’s first environmental group. Your water. Your environment. Your voice. Inside 2... A Dam Comes Down! 6... Member Spotlight: Reserve Expands to 930 Acres Matt Wasserman After many years of hope and several years of negotiation, completes a “conservation corri- the Watershed Association has purchased nearly 70 acres dor” between Hopewell Borough 8... of forest, wetlands, and meadow from Thompson Realty and Pennington (see map p. 11). Calendar Company, boosting the organization’s Watershed Reserve of Events to 930 acres. The acquisition unites the two previously The land, at the southwest corner of unconnected portions of the Watershed Reserve and Wargo and Moore’s Mill-Mt. Rose Roads, was purchased with funds that the Watershed Association secured from the state’s Green Acres Program. Mercer County and Hopewell Township provided matching funds through their respective open space programs and additional funds were provided by Conservation Resources, Inc. and individual donors. Prior to the purchase of the Thompson tract, the Watershed Reserve consisted of two nearby but separate pieces of land. The Thompson property consolidates the Reserve and protects a diversity of wildlife habitat. Approximately 70 percent of the land is forested with meadows and shrubland comprising the balance. The Thompson property now affords protection to a 1,000-foot section of the Honey Brook and its associated wetlands. The Honey Brook is a significant tributary to the Thompson Tract, looking north toward the Mt. Rose Ridge Category 1 waters of the Stony Brook, and provides source Continued on page 11 Conservation Advocacy Science Education FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Trucks and Fish When my son was little, he was obsessed with trucks.
    [Show full text]
  • Raritan TMDL – Solving In-Stream Nutrient Impairments,” Presented at the NJWEA, Central Section by TRC Omni
    Amendment to the Lower Raritan/Middlesex, Mercer County, Monmouth County, Northeast, Upper Delaware and Upper Raritan Water Quality Management Plans Total Maximum Daily Load Report For the Non-Tidal Raritan River Basin Addressing Total Phosphorus, Dissolved Oxygen, pH and Total Suspended Solids Impairments Watershed Management Areas 8, 9 and 10 Proposed: June 16, 2014 Established: June 2, 2015 Re-submittal: January 19, 2016 Approved: May 9, 2016 Adopted: May 24, 2016 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Monitoring and Standards Bureau of Environmental Analysis, Restoration and Standards PO Box 420, Mail Code: 401-04I Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0420 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary……………………………………………………..……………. 4 2.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….…... 8 3.0 Pollutant of Concern and Area of Interest…………………………………….…… 9 4.0 Source Assessment………………………………………………………………..….. 24 5.0 Analytical Approach and TMDL Calculation …………………………………..… 28 6.0 Follow-up Monitoring…………………………………………………………..…… 45 7.0 Implementation Plan……………………………………………………………..….. 45 8.0 Reasonable Assurance…………………………………………………………….…. 58 9.0 Public Participation………………………………………………………………….. 58 Appendix A: Cited References………………………………………………………..... 79 Appendix B: Municipalities Located in the Raritan River Basin, NJPDES Permit Number and their MS4 Designation ……………………….…. 81 Appendix C: Additional Impairments within TMDL Area …………………………. 84 Appendix D: TMDLs completed in the Raritan River Basin ……………………...…. 89 Appendix E: New Jersey Water Supply Authority - Nonpoint Source Implementation Activities ……………………...….……………………...….………………. 91 Tables Table 1. Assessment units addressed by the TMDL report……………………………… 6 Table 2. HUC 14 watersheds assessed by this TMDL study………………………..…… 17 Table 3. 2007 Land Use in the Raritan River Basin Covered by this TMDL………..….. 23 Table 4. Permitted Point Sources within the Non-Tidal Raritan River TMDL Study Area ……………………………………………………………….….
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Watershed Inventories Reserve Increasing Population and Steady Con- Version of Forests, Fields, and Wetlands to 6
    VOL. 56, NO. 4 Winter 2009–10 A publication of the Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association, central New Jersey’s first environmental group. HOLIDAY Your water. Your environment. Your voice. OPEN HOUSE see back cover Inside 3... Testing for Bacteria 4... Ted Stiles Intern State of the Watershed Inventories Reserve Increasing population and steady con- version of forests, fields, and wetlands to 6... asphalt and concrete have had a direct, Celebrating 60 negative effect on the health and quality at FEST of our water and environment. This is the conclusion of the Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association’s first ever “State of the Watershed” report, scheduled to be released at the end of 2009. A comprehensive look at where central New Jersey stands in terms of land use, water quality and environmental policy, our report aims to give local government leaders, businesses and concerned residents a clear snap-shot of the conditions we face today and the challenges ahead. “For the first time in our 60-year history, the Watershed Association has taken on the challenge of examining and synthesizing the available information on the condition of our watershed as a whole,” said Jim Waltman, Watershed Association Executive Director. “We are confident that this report will help shed new light on the problems facing our watershed and help identify solutions for the future.” Using data collected from our own programs and initiatives, as well as state sources, the “State of the Watershed” report illustrates the Is our watershed healthy? Our “State of the Watershed” report shows which areas are - and aren’t.
    [Show full text]
  • Hightstown Borough, Mercer County, New Jersey
    Impervious Cover Assessment And Reduction Action Plan Prepared For Hightstown Borough, Mercer County, New Jersey by the Watershed Institute December 30, 2020 Acknowledgements Designed as a blueprint for municipalities to take action to reduce impacts of stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces to New Jersey’s Waterways, this document was created by The Watershed Institute staff with Water Quality Restoration Grant funding from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection under the Federal Clean Water Act, Section 319(h). This study was created with guidance from, and in supplement to, similar work performed by the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program, and we would like to thank them for their input and support. 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Impervious Cover Analysis: Hightstown Borough ................................................................................................... 8 Municipal Subwatershed Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 8 Individual Lot Assessment .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]