DOCSLIB.ORG

PLIP Statistics, May 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLIP Statistics, May 2000 UNHCR STATISTICS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPERTY LAWS 31 May 2000 REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPERTY LAWS IN FEDERATION 31 May 2000 Socially Owned Property Private Property Total Efficiency MUNICIPALITIES / CANTONS No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession Ratio * Bihac 1,620 1,230 331 527 420 158 2,147 1,650 489 22.78% Bosanska Krupa 556 519 103 553 285 91 1,109 804 194 17.49% Bosanski Petrovac 456 239 110 1,658 1,325 1,258 2,114 1,564 1,368 64.71% Buzim 7 7 1 1 1 1 8 8 2 25.00% Cazin 106 100 35 43 31 18 149 131 53 35.57% Kljuc 862 535 122 472 360 71 1,334 895 193 14.47% Sanski Most 977 465 217 3,055 480 272 4,032 945 489 12.13% Velika Kladusa 417 397 187 86 34 19 503 431 206 40.95% Total UNA-SANA: 5,001 3,492 1,106 6,395 2,936 1,888 11,396 6,428 2,994 26.27% Domaljevac 8 8 1 2 1 1 10 9 2 20.00% Odzak 322 171 89 30 1 6 352 172 95 26.99% Orasje 166 100 54 168 51 31 334 151 85 25.45% Total POSAVINA: 496 279 144 200 53 38 696 332 182 26.15% Banovici 1,020 830 107 116 116 20 1,136 946 127 11.18% Celic 33 33 7 215 215 98 248 248 105 42.34% Doboj East 1 1 1 7 7 0 8 8 1 12.50% Gracanica 246 155 76 356 249 44 602 404 120 19.93% Gradacac 272 255 137 293 220 30 565 475 167 29.56% Kalesija 143 131 14 486 164 59 629 295 73 11.61% Kladanj 162 44 24 122 99 5 284 143 29 10.21% Lukavac 581 369 165 561 300 26 1,142 669 191 16.73% Sapna 28 26 9 108 75 0 136 101 9 6.62% Srebrenik 78 78 30 296 120 64 374 198 94 25.13% Teocak 7 4 1 6 0 0 13 4 1 7.69% Tuzla 4,661 1,600 664 1,013 454 89 5,674 2,054 753 13.27% Zivinice 308 100 64 303 104 66 611 204 130 21.28% Total TUZLA: 7,540 3,626 1,299 3,882 2,123 501 11,422 5,749 1,800 15.76% Breza 227 125 52 97 72 40 324 197 92 28.40% Doboj South 0 0 0 10 2 2 10 2 2 20.00% Kakanj 924 247 129 372 124 99 1,296 371 228 17.59% Maglaj 655 290 17 46 12 0 701 302 17 2.43% Olovo 281 133 7 46 36 4 327 169 11 3.36% Tesanj 157 89 47 291 241 78 448 330 125 27.90% Usora 2 0 2 78 68 13 80 68 15 18.75% Vares 1,395 1,173 591 42 37 35 1,437 1,210 626 43.56% Visoko 327 139 7 361 64 11 688 203 18 2.62% Zavidovici 1,330 530 163 745 130 95 2,075 660 258 12.43% Zenica 6,960 3,150 582 650 534 144 7,610 3,684 726 9.54% Source: Local Authorities / PLIP (Property Legislation Implementation Plan) Focal Points 1 REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPERTY LAWS IN FEDERATION 31 May 2000 Socially Owned Property Private Property Total Efficiency MUNICIPALITIES / CANTONS No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession Ratio * Zepce 320 173 55 923 831 551 1,243 1,004 606 48.75% Total ZENICA-DOBOJ: 12,578 6,049 1,652 3,661 2,151 1,072 16,239 8,200 2,724 16.77% Foca 55 49 0 303 163 0 358 212 0 0.00% Gorazde 1,394 1,268 194 226 145 35 1,620 1,413 229 14.14% Pale 32 28 0 12 10 10 44 38 10 22.73% Total BOSNIA-PODRINJE: 1,481 1,345 194 541 318 45 2,022 1,663 239 11.82% Bugojno 1,060 288 163 2,053 1,284 1,179 3,113 1,572 1,342 43.11% Busovaca 0 0 0 596 359 176 596 359 176 29.53% Donji Vakuf 320 208 80 122 110 14 442 318 94 21.27% Fojnica 241 151 124 400 281 269 641 432 393 61.31% Gornji Vakuf 193 85 46 45 37 20 238 122 66 27.73% Jajce 1,582 213 3 313 127 127 1,895 340 130 6.86% Kiseljak 112 63 28 1,703 1,023 754 1,815 1,086 782 43.09% Kresevo 18 18 14 107 67 57 125 85 71 56.80% Novi Travnik 2,090 623 351 826 643 546 2,916 1,266 897 30.76% Travnik 1,467 578 363 864 812 615 2,331 1,390 978 41.96% Vitez 592 224 159 783 522 304 1,375 746 463 33.67% Total CENTRAL BOSNIA: 7,675 2,451 1,331 7,812 5,265 4,061 15,487 7,716 5,392 34.82% Capljina 777 0 0 741 0 0 1,518 0 0 0.00% Citluk 5 0 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 0.00% Jablanica 165 117 28 48 30 22 213 147 50 23.47% Konjic 823 679 188 435 143 79 1,258 822 267 21.22% Mostar North 77 33 33 630 181 338 707 214 371 52.48% Mostar Old Town 1,533 299 91 601 214 154 2,134 513 245 11.48% Mostar South 21 1 0 115 13 0 136 14 0 0.00% Mostar South-East 3 8 4 193 257 30 196 265 34 17.35% Mostar South-West 3,633 65 7 256 3 0 3,889 68 7 0.18% Mostar West 2,218 49 13 132 9 7 2,350 58 20 0.85% Neum 31 30 2 111 61 43 142 91 45 31.69% Prozor-Rama 221 61 50 150 112 80 371 173 130 35.04% Stolac 442 7 0 472 4 4 914 11 4 0.44% Total HERZEGOVINA-NERETVA: 9,949 1,349 416 3,887 1,027 757 13,836 2,376 1,173 8.48% Grude 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00% Ljubuski 69 36 14 202 29 28 271 65 42 15.50% Posusje 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0.00% Total WEST HERZEGOVINA: 76 36 14 202 29 28 278 65 42 15.11% Centar/Stari Grad 6,901 2,233 595 602 57 4 7,503 2,290 599 7.98% Source: Local Authorities / PLIP (Property Legislation Implementation Plan) Focal Points 2 REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPERTY LAWS IN FEDERATION 31 May 2000 Socially Owned Property Private Property Total Efficiency MUNICIPALITIES / CANTONS No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession Ratio * Ilidza/Hadzici 3,820 1,885 306 1,827 1,504 411 5,647 3,389 717 12.70% Novi Grad 11,102 5,743 1,697 831 508 210 11,933 6,251 1,907 15.98% Novo Sarajevo 9,301 3,666 1,087 816 470 12 10,117 4,136 1,099 10.86% Vogosca/Ilijas 2,268 824 165 946 656 375 3,214 1,480 540 16.80% Total SARAJEVO: 33,392 14,351 3,850 5,022 3,195 1,012 38,414 17,546 4,862 12.66% Bosansko Grahovo 406 9 9 1,597 44 44 2,003 53 53 2.65% Drvar 1,744 104 16 1,191 92 6 2,935 196 22 0.75% Glamoc 322 77 5 200 62 23 522 139 28 5.36% Kupres 294 72 62 74 46 15 368 118 77 20.92% Livno 343 51 47 196 21 28 539 72 75 13.91% Tomislavgrad 52 1 0 74 33 25 126 34 25 19.84% Total HERZEG-BOSNIA: 3,161 314 139 3,332 298 141 6,493 612 280 4.31% Total FEDERATION : 81,349 33,292 10,145 34,934 17,395 9,543 116,283 50,687 19,688 16.93% % 41% 12% 50% 27% 44% 17% No of Claims w/oNo Decision of Decisions Repossession No of Claims w/oNo Decision of Decisions Repossession No of Claims w/oNo Decisionof Decisions Repossession 37,912 33,292 10,145 7,996 17,395 9,543 45,908 50,687 19,688 * Efficiency Ratio = Total number of repossessions / Total number of claims Socially Owned Property Private Property Total Federation 12% (Socially Owned and Private Property) 27% 23% 17% 47% 39% 41% 50% 44% No of Claims w/o Decision No of Claims w/o Decision No of Claims w/o Decision No of Decisions No of Decisions No of Decisions Repossession Repossession Repossession Source: Local Authorities / PLIP (Property Legislation Implementation Plan) Focal Points 3 REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPERTY LAWS IN REPUBLIKA SRPSKA 31 May 2000 Socially Owned Property Private Property Total Efficiency MUNICIPALITIES No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession Ratio* Banja Luka 8,217 392 68 5,571 727 211 13,788 1,119 279 2.02% Berkovici 2 1 3 7 7 9 8 3 33.33% Bijeljina 623 23 1 5,865 502 27 6,488 525 28 0.43% Bileca 129 91 10 161 101 25 290 192 35 12.07% Bratunac 148 15 7 1,369 16 4 1,517 31 11 0.73% Cajnice 91 11 0 684 169 35 775 180 35 4.52% Celinac 56 42 13 252 208 50 308 250 63 20.45% Derventa 1,008 138 64 3,205 1,368 1,207 4,213 1,506 1,271 30.17% Doboj 2,756 331 166 5,461 735 428 8,217 1,066 594 7.23% Gacko 264 61 21 392 121 11 656 182 32 4.88% Gradiska 399 189 26 3,400 1,885 545 3,799 2,074 571 15.03% Han Pijesak 56 1 0 101 31 3 157 32 3 1.91% Kalinovik 57 47 13 306 159 3 363 206 16 4.41% Knezevo 70 3 0 278 71 37 348 74 37 10.63% Kostajnica 27 23 1 253 227 75 280 250 76 27.14% Kotor Varos 241 212 23 3,087 1,672 1,126 3,328 1,884 1,149 34.53% Kozarska Dubica 225 54 12 1,319 420 124 1,544 474 136 8.81% Laktasi 31 18 4 405 210 58 436 228 62 14.22% Ljubinje 11 10 10 26 12 11 37 22 21 56.76% Lopare 68 3 0 530 16 6 598 19 6 1.00% Modrica 1,586 93 6 1,050 702 150 2,636 795 156 5.92% Milici 59 19 2 458 228 2 517 247 4 0.77% Mrkonjic Grad 166 15 5 480 85 51 646 100 56 8.67% Nevesinje 32 14 5 468 56 56 500 70 61 12.20% Novi Grad 440 80 11 2,776 1,180 75 3,216 1,260 86 2.67% Osmaci 3 0 0 831 232 153 834 232 153 18.35% Pale 222 109 53 1,531 320 152 1,753 429 205 11.69% Pelagicevo 17 11 0 628 423 5 645 434 5 0.78% Petrovo 31 27 6 29 26 16 60 53 22 36.67% Prijedor 1,919 366 90 8,511 1,420 265 10,430 1,786 355 3.40% Prnjavor 152 20 9 1,784 256 203 1,936 276 212 10.95% Ribnik 20 4 4 45 37 37 65 41 41 63.08% Rogatica 421 68 32 1,259 87 19 1,680 155 51 3.04% Rudo 168 69 0 859 415 70 1,027 484 70 6.82% Samac 376 17 4 818 85 62 1,194 102 66 5.53% Sekovici 50 12 4 74 21 12 124 33 16 12.90% Sipovo 104 8 0 359 113 138 463 121 138 29.81% Sokolac 78 7 3 710 225 7 788 232 10 1.27% Srbac 55 37 13 138 113 56 193 150 69 35.75% Srbinje 1,180 77 7 2,714 225 0 3,894 302 7 0.18% Source: Local Authorities / PLIP (Property Legislation Implementation Plan) Focal Points 7 REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPERTY LAWS IN REPUBLIKA SRPSKA 31 May 2000 Socially Owned Property Private Property Total Efficiency MUNICIPALITIES No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession Ratio* Srebrenica 544 107 6 3,027 184 1 3,571 291 7 0.20% Srpska Ilidza 822 107 5 340 18 2 1,162 125 7 0.60% Srpski Brod 1,152 105 37 986 87 72 2,138 192 109 5.10% Srpsko Gorazde 41 9 0 805 421 430 846 430 430 50.83% Srpsko Novo Sarajevo 6 4 0 176 87 24 182 91 24 13.19% Srpsko Orasje 1 1 1 16 16 16 17 17 17 100.00% Trnovo 93 14 5 263 35 2 356 49 7 1.97% Teslic 739 62 13 2,858 736 280 3,597 798 293 8.15% Trebinje 696 112 38 724 108 52 1,420 220 90 6.34% Ugljevik 134 8 3 399 104 58 533 112 61 11.44% Visegrad 495 36 2 1,689 5 0 2,184 41 2 0.09% Vlasenica 347 46 22 1,041 186
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina 2012
    Bosnia and Herzegovina Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2012 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2012 IMPRESSUM Client: Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina Prepared with the support of: Millennium Development Goals Achievement Fund United Nations Environment Program Thematic expert group: Anđa Hadžiabdić Esena Kupusović Fethi Silajdžić Ivan Brlek Laurent Mesbah Martin Tais Mehmed Cero Mihajlo Marković Milena Kozomara Semra Čavaljuga Senad Oprašić Tanja Trubajić Toni Nikolić Wilhelm Vogel Zvjezdan Karadžin Consultant: Enova d.o.o. Sarajevo Umweltbundesamt GmbH Translation: Amina Subašić-Kovač, Ajla Silajdžić-Dautbegović Graphic design: Tarik Hodžić Photo: Aleksandar Trifunović BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF FOREIGN TRADE AND ECONOMIC RELATIONS STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2012 MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS ACHIEVEMENT FUND CONTENTS Foreword 19 Acronyms and Abbreviations 20 Acknowledgements 24 Purpose of the State of Environment Report 27 Methodology and Availability of Data 28 Significance of Environmental Indicators and 29 Strategy of Selection 29 Report Development Process 30 Form of the Report and its Contents 30 CONTENTS OF THE REPORT 31 Brief Summary of the State of Environment 32 Environmental Indicators Partially or Completely Missing 38 Recommendations for Improving the State of the Environment and Key Tasks 39 1.. GENERAL INFORMATION 40 1.1 GEOGRAPHY 41 1.2 CLIMATE
    [Show full text]
  • Improving War Crimes Processing at the State Level in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    IMPROVING WAR CRIMES PROCESSING AT THE STATE LEVEL IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA A FOLLOW-UP REPORT BY HER HONOUR JUDGE JOANNA KORNER CMG QC TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY .................................................... 7 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 9 III. MAIN AREAS OF CONCERN...................................................................... 13 IV. THE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF THE POBiH ......................... 15 V. MENTORING ............................................................................................... 29 VI. INDICTMENTS ............................................................................................ 30 VII. BACKLOG AND TRANSFER OF CASES UNDER ARTICLE 27(a) CPC .... 37 VIII. CASES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE (“SV”) ..................................................... 41 IX. THE ‘CATEGORY A’ CASES ...................................................................... 42 X. LENGTH OF TRIALS................................................................................... 44 XI. HJPC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS (‘QUOTA’) .................. 48 XII. AMENDMENT OF THE CPC ....................................................................... 49 XIII. TRAINING
    [Show full text]
  • KEFALLONITOU 089-E
    Strasbourg, 4 October 2001 Restricted <cdl\doc\2001\cdl\089-e.doc> CDL (2001) 89 English only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ELECTION LAW OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA * (28 September 2001) * This translation is provided by the OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Election/Implementation Department, based on the local language version printed in the BiH Official Gazette of 19 September 2001. This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. CDL (2001) 89 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter 2 COMPETENT AUTHORITIES Chapter 3 VOTERS REGISTER Chapter 4 CERTIFICATION AND CANDIDACY FOR THE ELECTIONS Chapter 5 CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS Chapter 6 PROTECTION OF THE ELECTORAL RIGHT Chapter 7 RULES OF CONDUCT FOR POLITICAL PARTIES, COALITIONS, LISTS OF INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES AND INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES Chapter 8 PRESIDENCY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Chapter 9 PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Subchapter A House of Peoples of the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina Subchapter B House of Representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina Chapter 10 PARLIAMENT OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Subchapter A House of Peoples of the Parliament of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Subchapter B House of Representatives of the Parliament of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Chapter 11 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIKA SRPSKA Chapter 12 CANTONAL ASSEMBLIES, MUNICIPAL COUNCILS/ASSEMBLIES AND CITY COUNCILS/ASSEMBLIES Chapter 13 REPEATED, POSTPONED and EARLY ELECTIONS Chapter 14 CAMPAIGN FINANCE Chapter 15 MEDIA Chapter 16 OBSERVERS Chapter 17 BRCKO DISTRICT Chapter 18 TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS - 3 - CDL (2001) 89 PREAMBLE In accordance with Article II 1, Article IV 1., 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving War Crimes Processing at the State Level in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    IMPROVING WAR CRIMES PROCESSING AT THE STATE LEVEL IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA A FOLLOW-UP REPORT BY HER HONOUR JUDGE JOANNA KORNER CMG QC TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY .................................................... 7 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 9 III. MAIN AREAS OF CONCERN...................................................................... 13 IV. THE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF THE POBiH ......................... 15 V. MENTORING ............................................................................................... 29 VI. INDICTMENTS ............................................................................................ 30 VII. BACKLOG AND TRANSFER OF CASES UNDER ARTICLE 27(a) CPC .... 37 VIII. CASES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE (“SV”) ..................................................... 41 IX. THE ‘CATEGORY A’ CASES ...................................................................... 42 X. LENGTH OF TRIALS................................................................................... 44 XI. HJPC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS (‘QUOTA’) .................. 48 XII. AMENDMENT OF THE CPC ....................................................................... 49 XIII. TRAINING
    [Show full text]
  • UPI 05/2-23-11-114/19 Sarajevo, 27 September 2019
    Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERAL MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM Number: UPI 05/2-23-11-114/19 Sarajevo, 27 September 2019 PE AUTOCESTE FBIH /Seal: Public enterprise Autoceste Hamdije Kreševljakovića 19 Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine 71 000 SARAJEVO Limited liability company MOSTAR Number 05-449-3/19 Federal administration for Inspection Issues Date: 3 October, 2019 20..... Fehima ef. Ćurćiča 6 71 000 SARAJEVO Subject: Decision on delivery of environmental permit, -to be delivered- Dear Sir or Madam, Please find attached the Decision on issuing of environmental permit for design "Motorway on Corridor Vc" section: LOT 2 - section Doboj Jug (Karuše) - Sarajevo (south) - Tarčin in total length of 145 km Yours faithfully, To be delivered to: − the abovementioned person MINISTER − file Edita Đapo, PhD − case file /Handwritten singature: illegible/ /Seal: Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERAL MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM 1/ Ul. Hamdije čemerlića br. 2, 71 000 Sarajevo, Phone number 00 387 33 726 700, Fax 00 387 33 726 747 e-mail: [email protected], www.fmoit.gov.ba PE Autoceste FBIH, 05-449/19, 3 October 2019 [124], 4 October 2019 08:19 Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERAL MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM /Seal: Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERAL MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM 1/ Number: UPI 05/2-23-11-114/19 Sarajevo, 27 September 2019 Pursuant to Article 68 and 71 of the Law on Environmental Protection ("Official Gazette of Federation of BiH", No. 33/03), Article 18 paragraph 54 point a) of the Law on Amendments of the Law on Environmental Protection" ("Official Gazette of Federation of BiH", No.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    POLITICAL PLURALISM AND INTERNAL PARTY DEMOCRACY POLITICAL PLURALISM AND INTERNAL PARTY POLITICAL PLURALISM AND INTERNAL PARTY DEMOCRACY NATIONAL STUDY FOR BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA POLITICAL PLURALISM AND INTERNAL PARTY DEMOCRACY National Study for Bosnia and Herzegovina POLITICAL PLURALISM AND INTERNAL PARTY DEMOCRACY National Study for Bosnia and Herzegovina Publisher: Centar za monitoring i istraživanje CeMI UTICAJ PERSONALNOG GLASANJA NABul. UNUTARPARTIJSKU Josipa Broza 23A DEMOKRATIJU – SLUČAJ CRNA 81 000GORA Podgorica e-mail: cemi@t-com .me www.cemi.org.me Izdavač: For Publisher: Zlatko Vujović Editors: Nermina Mujagić Suad Arnautović Centar za monitoring i istraživanja CeMI Bul. Josipa Broza 23A Reviewer: 81 000 Podgorica Amer Osmić e‐mail: cemi@t‐com.me www.cemi.org.me Za izdavaAuthors:ča: Suad Arnautović Nermina Mujagić mr Zlatko Vujović Autori: Damir Kapidžić Amer Osmić Prof. dr Vladimir Goati Elma Huruz Prof. dr Srđan Darmanović Doc. dr Boris Vukićević Design: Studiomr Zlatko Vujović Mouse - Podgorica mr Nikoleta Tomović mr Vlado Dedović LayoutDizajn: and printing: Studio Mouse - Podgorica Studio Mouse ‐ Podgorica Pripema i štampa: Circulation: 300 Studio Mouse ‐ Podgorica Tiraž: The RRPP promotes social science research in the Western Balkans (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia). Social science research aids in the understanding of the specific reform needs of countries in the region300 and in identifying the long-term implications of policy NAPOMENA:choices. Researchers receive support through research grants, methodological and thematic trainings as well as opportunities for regional and international networking and mentoring. The RRPP is coordinated and operated by theOva studija je izrađena u okviru Regionalnog programa za promoc Interfaculty Institute for Central and Eastern Europe (IICEE) at the iju istraživanja na University of Fribourg Zapadnom Balkanu (RRPP), kojim rukovodi Univerzitet u Friburgu,(Switzerland).
    [Show full text]
  • OF the ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT for the PROJECT "MOTORWAY on CORRIDOR VC, LOT 2 SECTION DOBOJ SOUTH (KARUŠE) - SARAJEVO SOUTH (TARČIN) with a Total Length of 145 Km"
    OPERATOR: JP AUTOCESTE FBiH d.o.o. MOSTAR CONSULTANT: Ecoplan d.o.o. Mostar APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE (EXTENSION) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT "MOTORWAY ON CORRIDOR VC, LOT 2 SECTION DOBOJ SOUTH (KARUŠE) - SARAJEVO SOUTH (TARČIN) with a total length of 145 km" This document was financed by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) RESPONSIBLE PERSON: Marko Puljić, Manager of Ecoplan d.o.o. Mostar, Date September 2019 APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE (EXTENSION) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT "MOTORWAY ON CORRIDOR VC LOT 2 SECTION DOBOJ SOUTH (KARUŠE) - SARAJEVO SOUTH (TARČIN) with a total length of 145 km" Ecoplan d.o.o. Mostar September 2019 PROJECT DATA OPERATOR: JP Autoceste FBiH d.o.o. Mostar Adama Buća 20, 80 000 Mostar Phone/fax: +387 36 512 300 e-mail: [email protected] website: http://www.jpautoceste.ba/ CONSULTANT: Ecoplan d.o.o. Mostar Address: dr. Ante Starčevića 3., 88 000 Mostar Tel/fax: +387 36 397-400; 397-410 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.ecoplan.ba PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE (EXTENSION) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT "MOTORWAY ON CORRIDOR VC, LOT 2 SECTION DOBOJ SOUTH (KARUŠE) - SARAJEVO SOUTH (TARČIN) with a total length of 145 km" EXPERT TEAM: Sanja Jelavić, B.S.C.E. Fahro Belko, M.Sc. Marinko Dalmatin, B.Sc. Biologist Josip Marinčić, B.Sc. (Geol.) Borislav Puljić, Ph.D. (Architecture) Marija Rakić, B.Arch. Danijela Mandić, B.S.C.E. Anđelka Vojvodić, B.S.C.E. Marina Jeličić, B.S.C.E. Mirela Šetka Prlić, B.S.C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Uuunnniiittteeeddd Nnnaaatttiiiooonnnsss Dddeeevvveeelllooopppmmmeeennnttt Aaassssssiiissstttaaannnccceee Fffrrraaammmeeewwwooorrrkkk
    UUUNNNIIITTTEEEDDD NNNAAATTTIIIOOONNNSSS DDDEEEVVVEEELLLOOOPPPMMMEEENNNTTT AAASSSSSSIIISSSTTTAAANNNCCCEEE FFFRRRAAAMMMEEEWWWOOORRRKKK FFFOOORRR BBBOOOSSSNNNIIIAAA AAANNNDDD HHHEEERRRZZZEEEGGGOOOVVVIIINNNAAA 222000000555 --- 222000000888 Sarajevo September 2004 i TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA iv BIH FACTS AND FIGURES v UN COUNTRY TEAM IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. UNDAF RESULTS 3 2.1. Current BiH Context and Development Challenges 3 2.2. Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and the road to Europe 7 2.3. UNDAF Outcomes 8 2.3.1. GOVERNANCE 8 2.3.2. SOCIAL PROTECTION, EDUCATION AND HEALTH 10 2.3.3. HUMAN SECURITY 12 3. ESTIMATED RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS 14 4.1. Implementation 14 4.2. Coordination 14 5. MONITORING AND EVALUATION 15 5.1. Monitoring 15 5.2. Evaluation 16 6. ANNEXES 17 6.1. UNDAF Results Matrix (2005-2008) 17 6.2. Human Rights and National Policy Frameworks 26 ii ABBREVIATIONS BiH Bosnia and Herzegovina BHCD Bosnia and Herzegovina Commission for De-mining BHMAC Bosnia and Herzegovina Mine Action Centre BHWI Bosnia and Herzegovina Women‟s Initiative CARDS Community Assistance for Reconstruction Development and Stabilisation in the Balkans CCA Common Country Assessment CCS Common Country Study CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women CEE Central and Eastern Europe CERD International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination CID Clinic for Infectious Diseases CRC Convention
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Package
    UNHCR The UN Refugee Agency STATISTICS PACKAGE www.unhcr.ba Sarajevo 31 December 2001 SUMMARY OF REGISTERED RETURNS OF DISPLACED PERSONS WITHIN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (MAJORITY AND MINORITY RETURNS) TABLE 1 C A N T O N S Total Tuzla Grand Total Sarajevo Posavina Una-Sana Canton 10 Brcko District Zenica-Doboj Federation of BiH Central Bosnia Republika Srpska Bosnia-Podrinje West-Herzegovina Herzegovina-Neretva January 184 179 128 1 758 144 20 886 2 2,302 1,275 115 3,692 February 744 16 110 42 11 424 222 10 1,306 28 2,913 1,292 176 4,381 March 1,009 2 110 174 8 459 556 18 1,123 275 3,734 958 835 5,527 April 764 27 136 141 31 582 226 1,494 365 3,766 2,206 5,972 May 590 3 185 136 7 422 558 1,494 186 3,581 3,263 6,844 June 282 19 114 163 6 576 443 8 1,196 170 2,977 1,876 4,853 2001 July 306 4 246 331 24 377 353 1,485 94 3,220 2,437 5,657 1) August 255 168 171 401 624 10 1,667 44 3,340 1,843 1,188 6,371 September 197 66 118 290 677 5 1,396 43 2,792 3,018 5,810 October 218 32 158 174 518 702 7 1,493 113 3,415 4,508 7,923 November 154 2 124 180 521 749 4 1,507 68 3,309 9,630 12,939 December 138 45 74 169 799 579 4 1,472 456 3,736 3,821 2,646 10,203 TOTAL 4,841 150 1,670 1,927 88 6,127 5,833 86 16,519 1,844 39,085 36,127 4,960 80,172 Total Minority DPs: 4,803 150 1,637 1,785 66 4,972 5,510 86 13,409 1,844 34,262 35,516 4,960 74,738 Source: UNHCR; Municipal Authorities; DPs Associations and NGOs 1) Cumulative figure since April to September UNHCR Sarajevo SUMMARY OF REGISTERED REPATRIATION OF REFUGEES TO BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (MAJORITY AND MINORITY
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis on Public Infrastructure Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Analysis on Public Infrastructure Bosnia and Herzegovina CSOs as equal partners in monitoring public finances September 2017 CREDITS Author: Amra Skramončin, Project Assistant, Centre for Ecology and Energy ([email protected]) Formatting: Emina Hasanagić, Administrative Manager, Krila nade ([email protected]) This document has been produced as a part of the project “CSOs as equal partners in the monitoring of public finance“ which started beginning of 2016 and is implemented by a consortium of 10 organizations from 7 countries and will last for four years. The aim of the project is to improve the transparency and accountability of policy and decision making in the area of public finances through strengthening the role and voice of NGOs in monitoring the institutions that operate in the area of public finances. In this way, the project will strengthen CSO 1 knowledge of public finance and IFIs and improve CSO capacities for monitoring. Additionally, it will help advocate for transparency, accountability and effectiveness from public institutions in public finance. Moreover, this project will build know-how in advocating for sustainability, transparency and accountability of public finance and IFIs. This project will also increase networking and cooperation of CSOs on monitoring of public finance at regional and EU level. Lastly, it will increase the understanding of the media and wider public of the challenges in public finance and the impacts of IFIs. Key project activities are research and monitoring, advocacy, capacity building and transfer of knowledge/practices and networking in the field of the 4 specific topics: public debt, public-private partnerships, tax justice and public infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • PLIP Statistics, July 2000
    UNHCR STATISTICS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPERTY LAWS 31 July 2000 REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPERTY LAWS IN FEDERATION 31 July 2000 Socially Owned Property Private Property Total Efficiency Last MUNICIPALITIES / CANTONS No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession No of Claims No of Decisions Repossession Ratio * Update Bihac 1,620 1,250 425 0 0 0 1,620 1,250 425 26.23% 07/00 Bosanska Krupa 556 527 212 661 424 231 1,217 951 443 36.40% 07/00 Bosanski Petrovac 457 295 138 1,704 1,417 1,287 2,161 1,712 1,425 65.94% 07/00 Buzim 7 7 1 1 1 1 8 8 2 25.00% 05/00 Cazin 106 100 60 48 35 22 154 135 82 53.25% 07/00 Kljuc 847 596 166 504 435 175 1,351 1,031 341 25.24% 07/00 Sanski Most 977 531 250 3,304 644 373 4,281 1,175 623 14.55% 07/00 Velika Kladusa 417 402 242 97 35 23 514 437 265 51.56% 07/00 Total UNA-SANA: 4,987 3,708 1,494 6,319 2,991 2,112 11,306 6,699 3,606 31.89% Domaljevac 8 8 1 2 1 1 10 9 2 20.00% 07/00 Odzak 322 194 124 260 27 10 582 221 134 23.02% 07/00 Orasje 167 11 67 203 99 37 370 110 104 28.11% 07/00 Total POSAVINA: 497 213 192 465 127 48 962 340 240 24.95% Banovici 1,020 830 187 116 116 23 1,136 946 210 18.49% 07/00 Celic 33 33 7 215 215 98 248 248 105 42.34% 05/00 Doboj East 1 1 1 7 7 0 8 8 1 12.50% 05/00 Gracanica 246 196 108 395 296 70 641 492 178 27.77% 07/00 Gradacac 272 255 0 301 247 69 573 502 69 12.04% 07/00 Kalesija 143 136 73 526 179 64 669 315 137 20.48% 07/00 Kladanj 162 51 26 158 113 7 320 164 33 10.31% 07/00 Lukavac 649 478 367 632 361 36 1,281 839 403 31.46% 07/00 Sapna
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiological Characteristics of Meningococcal Meningitis in the Area of Zenica-Doboj Canton
    Epidemiological Characteristics of Meningococcal Meningitis in the Area of Zenica-Doboj Canton ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.200-203 Published online: 31/05/2014 Med Arh. 2014 Jun; 68(3): 200-203 Published print: 06/2014 Received: March 11th 2014 | Accepted: May 14th 2014 © AVICENA 2014 Epidemiological Characteristics of Meningococcal Meningitis in the Area of Zenica-Doboj Canton in Period from 2008 to 2012 Ibrahim Alickovic1, Lejla Calkic2, Salih Tandir2,3, Suad Sivic2,3 Health Faculty Zenica, Primary Health Care Center Kakanj, Kakanj, Bosnia and Herzegovina1 Health Faculty Zenica, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina2 Health Faculty Zenica, Cantonal Institute of Public Health Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina3 Corresponding author: ass. prof. Ibrahim Alickovic, MD, PhD. Health Faculty Zenica, Primary Health Care Center Kakanj, Bosnia and Herzegovina. ABSTRACT Introduction: Meningococcal meningitis now represents a significant public health problem, not only in developing countries but also in developed ones. The disease usually occurs sporadically, and much less in smaller epidemics. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of meningococcal meningitis in the area of ​​Zenica-Doboj Canton in the five-year period from 2008 to 2012th. In total there were 38 reported and hospitalized patients, with an average of 7-8 patients per year. Results: Most commonly disease occurred in infants and young children (28.9%). The highest number was recorded in 2011, 10 cases or (26.3%). Most patients in the monitored period were registered in the municipality of Zenica–12 cases (31.6%) and Zepce 8 cases (21.1%). All hospital- ized patients were sporadic cases, there has never been an epidemic in the observed period.
    [Show full text]