Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway Notices of Requirement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway Notices of Requirement NZTA Notice of Requirement Te Ahu a Turanga - Manawatū Tararua Highway Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway Notices of Requirement for Designations Territorial Authority Recommendation Report May 2019 NZTA Notice of Requirement Te Ahu a Turanga - Manawatū Tararua Highway Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Appointments........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Context .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 The Notices of Requirement ..................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Project Description................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Project Construction ................................................................................................................ 3 1.6 Detailed Design, Management Plans and Outline Plans ............................................................ 5 1.7 Other Resource Consents, Authorisations or Approvals .......................................................... 8 2.0 Prehearing Process .......................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Affected Parties/Stakeholders .................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Section 92 Further Information Request ................................................................................... 9 2.3 Public Notification .................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Submissions .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.5 Pre-Hearing Minutes ............................................................................................................... 11 3.0 Hearing and Post-Hearing Steps ..................................................................................... 11 3.1 The Hearing ............................................................................................................................ 11 3.2 Post-Hearing .......................................................................................................................... 12 4.0 Statutory Framework (section 171(1)) ............................................................................. 13 4.1 Relevant RMA Instruments ..................................................................................................... 13 4.1.1 Traffic and transport ........................................................................................................... 14 4.1.2 Noise and vibration ............................................................................................................ 15 4.1.3 Social ................................................................................................................................. 15 4.1.4 Landscape and visual amenity ........................................................................................... 15 4.1.5 Natural character ................................................................................................................ 16 4.1.6 Historic heritage and archaeology ...................................................................................... 16 4.1.7 Indigenous biodiversity ...................................................................................................... 16 4.1.8 Tangata whenua values and interests ................................................................................. 16 4.1.9 Network utilities and affected properties ............................................................................ 17 4.1.10 Natural hazards .............................................................................................................. 17 4.1.11 Stormwater, erosion and sediment control ..................................................................... 17 4.2 Other Statutes ........................................................................................................................ 17 4.2.1 Land Transport Management Act 2003 ............................................................................... 17 4.2.2 Rangitane o Manawatū Claims Settlement Act 2016............................................................ 18 4.2.3 Rangitane Tu Mai Ra (Wairarapa Tamaki nui-a Rua) Claims Settlement Act 2017 ................ 19 4.2.4 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 ................................................................ 19 4.2.5 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 ......................................................................................... 19 4.2.6 Wildlife Act 1953 ................................................................................................................. 19 4.2.7 Queen Elizabeth the Second National Trust Act 1977 ......................................................... 20 4.3 Other Strategic and Planning Documents ............................................................................... 20 4.3.1 Government Policy Statement on Land Transport (GPS) .................................................... 20 4.3.2 National Land Transport Programme (NLTP) ...................................................................... 20 4.3.3 Horizons Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP).................................................................. 20 4.3.4 Horizons Regional Pest Management Strategy 2017 -2037 (PMS)........................................ 20 4.3.5 Manawatū River Leaders Accord 2010 ................................................................................ 20 4.3.6 Growing Manawatū – MDC Economic Growth Strategy ....................................................... 20 4.3.7 Te Āpiti Masterplan ............................................................................................................ 21 4.3.8 Iwi Management Plans ........................................................................................................ 21 5.0 Application of Section 171 .............................................................................................. 21 5.1 Established Existing Environment (section 171(1)) ................................................................. 21 5.1.1 Traffic and transport ........................................................................................................... 21 NZTA Notice of Requirement Te Ahu a Turanga - Manawatū Tararua Highway 5.1.2 Noise and vibration ............................................................................................................ 22 5.1.3 Social ................................................................................................................................. 23 5.1.4 Landscape and visual amenity ........................................................................................... 23 5.1.5 Natural character ................................................................................................................ 24 5.1.6 Historic heritage and archaeology ...................................................................................... 24 5.1.7 Indigenous biodiversity ...................................................................................................... 24 5.1.8 Tangata whenua values and interests ................................................................................. 25 5.1.9 Network utilities and affected properties ............................................................................ 26 5.1.10 Natural hazards .............................................................................................................. 26 5.2 Assessment of Effects (section 171(1))................................................................................... 26 5.2.1 Traffic and transport ........................................................................................................... 26 5.2.2 Noise and vibration ............................................................................................................ 29 5.2.3 Social ................................................................................................................................. 31 5.2.4 Landscape and visual amenity ........................................................................................... 33 5.2.5 Natural character ................................................................................................................ 34 5.2.6 Historic heritage and archaeology ...................................................................................... 37 5.2.7 Indigenous biodiversity ...................................................................................................... 37 5.2.8 Tangata whenua values and interests ................................................................................. 43 5.2.9 Network utilities and affected properties ............................................................................ 45 5.2.10 Natural hazards .............................................................................................................. 51 5.2.11 Stormwater,
Recommended publications
  • Geology of the Wairarapa Area
    GEOLOGY OF THE WAIRARAPA AREA J. M. LEE J.G.BEGG (COMPILERS) New International NewZOaland Age International New Zealand 248 (Ma) .............. 8~:~~~~~~~~ 16 il~ M.- L. Pleistocene !~ Castlecliffian We £§ Sellnuntian .~ Ozhulflanl Makarewan YOm 1.8 100 Wuehlaplngien i ~ Gelaslan Cl Nukumaruan Wn ~ ;g '"~ l!! ~~ Mangapanlan Ql -' TatarianiMidian Ql Piacenzlan ~ ~;: ~ u Wai i ian 200 Ian w 3.6 ,g~ J: Kazanlan a.~ Zanetaan Opoitian Wo c:: 300 '"E Braxtonisn .!!! .~ YAb 256 5.3 E Kunaurian Messinian Kapitean Tk Ql ~ Mangapirian YAm 400 a. Arlinskian :;; ~ l!!'" 500 Sakmarian ~ Tortonisn ,!!! Tongaporutuan Tt w'" pre-Telfordian Ypt ~ Asselian 600 '" 290 11.2 ~ 700 'lii Serravallian Waiauan 5w Ql ." i'l () c:: ~ 600 J!l - fl~ '§ ~ 0'" 0 0 ~~ !II Lillburnian 51 N 900 Langhian 0 ~ Clifdenian 5e 16.4 ca '1000 1 323 !II Z'E e'" W~ A1tonian PI oS! ~ Burdigalian i '2 F () 0- w'" '" Dtaian Po ~ OS Waitakian Lw U 23.8 UI nlan ~S § "t: ." Duntroonian Ld '" Chattian ~ W'" 28.5 P .Sll~ -''" Whalngaroan Lwh O~ Rupelian 33.7 Late Priabonian ." AC 37.0 n n 0 I ~~ ~ Bortonian Ab g; Lutetisn Paranaen Do W Heretauncan Oh 49.0 354 ~ Mangaorapan Om i Ypreslan .;;: w WalD8wsn Ow ~ JU 54.8 ~ Thanetlan § 370 t-- §~ 0'" ~ Selandian laurien Dt ." 61.0 ;g JM ~"t: c:::::;; a.os'"w Danian 391 () os t-- 65.0 '2 Maastrichtian 0 - Emslsn Jzl 0 a; -m Haumurian Mh :::;; N 0 t-- Campanian ~ Santonian 0 Pragian Jpr ~ Piripauan Mp W w'" -' t-- Coniacian 1ij Teratan Rt ...J Lochovlan Jlo Turonian Mannaotanean Rm <C !II j Arowhanan Ra 417 0- Cenomanian '" Ngaterian Cn Prldoli
    [Show full text]
  • RESOURCE CONSENT DECISION New Zealand Transport Agency
    RESOURCE CONSENT DECISION New Zealand Transport Agency (Transport Registry Centre Palmerston North) Decision on an application for resource consents to undertake vegetation clearance, land disturbance, discharge to water and drilling in the bed of a river for geotechnical investigations in and around the Manawatū River, Parahaki Island, and At-Risk, Rare and Threatened habitats adjacent to the Manawatū River, associated with Te Ahu a Tūranga - Manawatū Gorge Replacement at SH3, Palmerston North Application Reference: APP-2019202606.00 Decision Date: 26 February 2020 Expiry Date: 26 February 2022 Application Summary Proposal The New Zealand Transport Agency (the Applicant) has applied for resource consents to enable geotechnical investigations to inform the design and construction of the Te Ahu a Turanga (Manawatū Tararua Highway project). The Applicant has requested that the works be considered as two distinct locations as follows: 1. Up to six boreholes located to the immediate east of Parahaki Island, within the bed of the Manawatū River and the true left bank of the Manawatū River; and 2. Up to 13 boreholes located on land on the true right of the Manawatū River, and adjacent land on Raupo dominated seepage wetland and within Old Growth forest, which are considered to be At- Risk, Rare or Threatened habitats in Schedule F of the One Plan. The application notes that for some locations, 2-3 boreholes maybe required, with the final number being dependent on the geotechnical findings. The proposed location of the bore holes are shown in Figure one below. Figure 1 - Borehole locations The proposed boreholes are proposed to range between 0-70m in depth, with a casing size of 102mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Manawatu Gorge POU 'WHATONGA'
    Manawatu Gorge POU ‘WHATONGA’ The Manawatu gorge which is situated approx 20km East of Palmerston North connects the Manawatu region to the Hawkes Bay region. It’s a unique piece of the region and is the only place in New Zealand where a river begins its journey on the opposite side of the main divide to where it joins the sea. This vital transport route is steeped in history and as we have come to know recently its steep rock faces and gorse covered hills are extremely prone to erosion with rock falls and road closures being an all too common occurrence. As part of the 10 year Manawatu Gorge Biodiversity Project (2006 -2016) the construction of information Whare at the end of the gorge, gave the opportunity to tell the story or the history of the gorge. A main feature of this story was the construction of a Pou of Whatonga which seeks to bring to life the spirit of the Manawatu Gorge and rekindle the links with its people. The Pou of Whatonga stands 6 meters tall and is an iconic expression of the spirit of this location. Designed by Artist Paul Horton and manufactured by Martin Engineering in Palmerston North the large structure made up of pipes and rolled plates that had been intricately cut to form an impressive and imposing piece that will tell the story for generations to come. Early talks with the artist made sure that the item was able to be dipped in a way that eliminated zinc traps whilst taking nothing away from the overall design.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads to Rivers in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region: an Analysis of Low Flow State
    MANAGING OUR ENVIRONMENT Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads to Rivers in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region : An Analysis of Low Flow State : Technical Report to Support Policy Development Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads to Rivers in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region: An Analysis of Low Flow State Technical Report to Support Policy Development August 2007 Authors Kate McArthur and Maree Clark Acknowledgements to Jon Roygard, Marianne Watson and the Environmental Compliance Team Internal Review Greg Bevin – Senior Environmental Compliance Officer Jeff Watson – Manager Resource Data External Review Bob Wilcock and Neale Hudson, NIWA Graham Sevicke-Jones, Hawkes Bay Regional Council Kirsten Meijer, Environment Southland August 2007 ISBN: 1-877413-81-X Report No: 2007/EXT/793 CONTACT 24hr Freephone 0508 446 749 [email protected] www.horizons.govt.nz Kairanga Palmerston North Dannevirke Cnr Rongotea & 11-15 Victoria Avenue Weber Road, P O Box 201 Kairanga-Bunnythorpe Rds Private Bag 11 025 Dannevirke 4942 Palmerston North Manawatu Mail Centre Palmerston North 4442 Levin 11 Bruce Road, P O Box 680 Marton T 06 952 2800 Levin 5540 Hammond Street F 06 952 2929 SERVICE REGIONAL P O Box 289 DEPOTS Pahiatua CENTRES Marton 4741 HOUSES Cnr Huxley & Queen Streets Wanganui P O Box 44 181 Guyton Street Pahiatua 4941 Taumarunui P O Box 515 34 Maata Street Wanganui Mail Centre Taihape P O Box 194 Wanganui 4540 Torere Road, Ohotu Taumarunui 3943 F 06 345 3076 P O Box 156 Taihape 4742 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The growth of nuisance periphyton in many rivers and streams of the Manawatu- Wanganui Region is a significant environmental issue, requiring the reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus loads to surface water.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 87F Report to Waka Kotahi Nz Transport Agency
    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency to Manawatu Whanganui Regional Council for resource consents associated with the construction and operation of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway. SECTION 87F REPORT TO WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL 25 May 2020 Section 87F Report APP-2017201552.00 - Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway 1 Prepared by Mark St.Clair – Planning A. OUTLINE OF REPORT 1 This report, required by section 87F of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”), addresses the issues set out in sections 104 to 112 of the RMA, to the extent that they are relevant to the applications lodged with the Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council (“Horizons”) The consents applied for, by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (the “Transport Agency”) are required to authorise the construction, operation and maintenance of the Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway (the “Project”). 2 In addition, the Transport Agency separately applied for a Notice of Requirement (“NoR”) to Palmerston North City Council (“PNCC”), Tararua District Council (“TDC”) and Manawatu District Council (“MDC”). The Environment Court confirmed the designation for the Project, including a more northern alignment (discussed later in this section 87F report), subject to conditions, on 23 March 2020. While this section 87F report only addresses the applications lodged with MWRC, the designation and the associated conditions have also been considered as part of the assessment. 3 This report has been prepared in accordance with section 87F of the RMA which sets out the matters the report must cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025
    Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025 Month and Y 1 2 Contents Introduction from the Chairman ............................................................................................. 5 Section 1: Context of the Regional Land Transport Plan ....................................................... 7 1.1 Purpose of the Plan ................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Responsibilities of Transport Organisations ............................................................ 7 1.2.1 Central Government ......................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Regional and Local Government ...................................................................... 8 1.3 The National and Regional policy context ............................................................... 8 1.3.1 Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2015 ................................... 8 1.3.2 New Zealand Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy 2011-2016 ........... 8 1.3.3 The One Plan................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Process for the Development of the Plan ................................................................ 9 Section 2: The Strategic Context ......................................................................................... 11 2.1 Setting the Scene – The Manawatu-Wanganui Region ......................................... 11 2.1.1 Geography ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Transport Resilience
    Measuring Transport Resilience A Manawatu-Wanganui Region Case Study Muhammad Imran, Christine Cheyne & John Harold Resource & Environmental Planning Programme School of People, Environment and Planning Massey University, New Zealand Massey University Research Online 2014 Executive summary The resilience of transport networks is attracting greater scrutiny at the international, national and sub-national levels. This research report explores the current state of knowledge about measuring transport resilience and presents a case study to address the question is: How resilient is the road and rail infrastructure in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region? This region in New Zealand’s lower North Island provides an interesting case study due to its strategic location in the North Island’s and indeed New Zealand’s transport network. In addition, it has experienced significant disruptions in the recent past, most notably widespread failures caused by flooding in 2004, and the lengthy closure of a significant inter-regional road connection, the Manawatu Gorge State Highway 3 road, due to a landslide in 2011-2012. It also provides an opportunity to explore this topic outside of a major metropolitan region. The region’s transport networks and infrastructure also have important social and economic functions. This research report is structured around a proposed Transport Resilience Indicator Framework (RIF) which explores six key dimensions of transport infrastructure resilience: engineering, services, ecological, social, economic and institutional. This holistic approach to measuring transport resilience and is envisaged to accommodate both qualitative and quantitative indicators. Within this framework, data were gathered via analysis of secondary sources and nine key informant interviews. The interview participants were from public sector agencies responsible for managing aspects of the region’s transport network, the private sector and one social service provider.
    [Show full text]
  • Manawatū-Whanganui Leaders Send Joint Manawatū Gorge Solution Submission
    MEDIA RELEASE 26 October 2017 For immediate release Manawatū-Whanganui leaders send joint Manawatū Gorge solution submission A submission in support of NZTA’s Manawatū Gorge option four has been made by Horizons regional leaders through Accelerate25’s Lead Team Facilitator Michael McCartney. Accelerate25 is a regional economic growth programme which aligns people, policy and funding in priority areas to drive growth and create a more prosperous Manawatū-Whanganui Region by 2025. Led by a governing Lead Team representing business, iwi, central government and seven local territorial authorities, Accelerate25’s aim is to realise the opportunities and enablers identified in the Manawatū-Whanganui Economic Action Plan. One of the plan’s key enablers is distribution and transport, involving a large integrated project team working on enhancing infrastructure around the Central New Zealand distribution hub, including the regional freight ring road that is currently underway. Mr McCartney says based on the information currently available, and in order to meet the submission timeframe, the Lead Team acknowledges that NZTA’s option four alignment is the best solution. “While further details and analysis of the proposal is needed, the southern Manawatū Gorge replacement route shows closer connection to Palmerston North and key freight hubs such as the city’s North East and Feilding’s industrial areas, the distribution hub and airport, through to Tararua and Hawke’s Bay,” says Mr McCartney. “Option four is also preferred as it will directly connect with the regional freight ring road which central government announced funding towards last year and forms part of the Regional Land Transport Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 3671-The Neotectonics of the Ruahine and Mohaka Faults, Between The
    S&G 3671 FINAL PROGRESS REPORT Submitted to EARTHQUAKE AND WAR DAMAGE COMMISSION on the project 'THE NEOTECTONICS OF THE RUAHINE AND MOHAKA FAULTS, BETWEEN THE MANAWATU GORGE AND PUKETITIRI' December 1995 Principal Investigators Associate Professor V E Neall and Ms J A Hanson Department of Soil Science, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North -- 0.-------------------1.. ABSTRACT New Zealand lies across the active IndoAustralian-Pacific plate boundary. Volcanic activity and earthquakes are a direct result of interaction between these two plates. The Wellington and Ruahine Faults are major strike-slip faults that have formed due to this interaction. These faults move sideways in a horizontal motion so that the area west of, and including the Central Ranges is moving northward while the East Coast of the southern North Island is moving southward. If earthquake activity is averaged out on a yearly basis, these two sections of the North Island move past each other at a rate of 5 to 7 mm (for the Wellington area) and up to 15 mm per year for the Dannevirke area. These rates of motion are high by world standards. The purpose of this study was to establish a record of past earthquake events which would allow future estimates of fault behaviour to be made in the region between the Manawatu Gorge and the Napier-Taupo highway. Trenches have been excavated through these faults in mainly swampy environments. Within these trenches are layers of earthquake debris, deformation and layers of peat. The layers of peat have been radiocarbon dated to give the approximate ages of the underlying and overlying earthquake debris.
    [Show full text]
  • Papaioea Year Three
    2020/21 ABMAHERE PŪTEA Ā-TAU ANNUAL BUDGET PAPAIOEA PALMERSTON NORTH CITY YEAR THREE OF THE 10 YEAR PLAN 2018 – 2028 He iti rā, he iti pounamu Te Kaunihera o Papaioea Small city benefits, big city ambition pncc.govt.nz Palmerston North City Council AN INNOVATIVE 1. AND GROWING CITY ONE VISION A CREATIVE 2. AND EXCITING CITY Palmerston North A CONNECTED SMALL CITY BENEFITS 3. AND SAFE COMMUNITY BIG CITY AMBITION 4. AN ECO CITY Five Strategic Goals A DRIVEN AND 5. ENABLING COUNCIL. Introduction INTRODUCTION MAHERE PŪTEA Ā-TAU ANNUAL BUDGET Small City Benefits, Big City Ambition 5 ANNUAL BUDGET 2020/21 | Palmerston North City This Annual Budget was adopted by the Council on 24 June 2020 in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002. The Annual Budget states the Council’s intentions. It is based on the Council’s best information and planning at the time it was developed. If circumstances change, the Council may have to change its intentions. This is especially the case in light of current uncertain economic conditions. All the decisions in this document are reviewable, especially during future 10 Year Plans and Annual Budgets This is made clear in the Local Government Act 2002, Section 96: (1) The effect of a long-term plan and an annual plan adopted by a local authority is to provide a formal and public statement of the local authority’s intentions in relation to the matters covered by the plan. (2) A resolution to adopt a long-term plan or an annual plan does not constitute a decision to act on any specific matter included within the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Manawatu River Fishery
    n o gi Re ellington W Vickerman Road - this is private. is this - Road Vickerman www.fishandgame.org.nz d n a d a o R e r e K e r e K s k n i l t a h t k c a r t d e m r o f e h t e s u T O N O D Fax: 06 356 2780 356 06 Fax: . r e v i r e h t o t y l t c e r i d k l a w d n a p u k r a P . ) d a o R o n i k o r i h W o t n i t f e l Telephone: 06 359 0409 359 06 Telephone: d n a d a o R e r e K e r e K o t n i t h g i r , d a o R s g n i r p S o t n i d a o R n o n n a h S Palmerston North Palmerston n o t x o F e h t f f o t f e l g n i n r u t y b d a o R n a m r e k c i V s s e c c a r o ( d n e P O Box 1325 Box O P e h t o t l e v a r t d n a d a o R n a m r e k c i V o t d a o R o n i k o r i h W g n o l a n o n Regio ton g in l l e W y r r a c y l e v i t a n r e t l A .
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentation, Metal Contamination and Coastal Landscape Stability Of
    Report prepared for the Department of Conservation Sedimentation, metal contamination and coastal landscape stability of the Manawatu River Estuary: Environmental Status of the Ramsar-Listed wetland and future monitoring programme Prepared by: Josephine Woods and Dr David M. Kennedy School of Geography, Environment & Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington November 2008 1 Executive Summary • This report entails a sediment monitoring program which aims to establish baseline data for monitoring the Manawatu River Estuary. Of specific interest are the sediment characteristics and what are the potential impacts of the marsh area on the northern bank of the estuary. This marsh/ mudflat area is significant bird habitat • Aerial photo analysis of the estuary between 1950 and 2005 shows significant extension (547m) of Fernbird Flat. It also shows fluctuations in the location of the channel entrance, but no significant channel movement towards the marsh area on the northern bank of the estuary. Flood protection works are likely to have stabilised most of the channel movements. Flood events, such as the 2004 flood occur with the greatest amount of channel migration. • Aerial photo analysis also revealed the evolution of a sand spit, which separates the marsh area from the main channel. This sand spit has played a significant part in reducing the impact of the river channel on the marsh. • A significant increase in the area of vegetated dunes over time is also evident in the aerial photo analysis. This signifies a decrease in wind erosion and dune mobility at the estuary mouth. • Grain size analysis of surfical sediments indicated that most are sourced from aeolian (wind) sources, or fluvial (river) deposits of silts and clays in low energy environments.
    [Show full text]