Manawatu River Users' Advisory Group 06 June 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Manawatu River Users' Advisory Group 06 June 2017 Manawatu River Users' Advisory Group 06 June 2017 Report No. 17-94 Information Only - No Decision Required HARBOURMASTER'S REPORT 1. PURPOSE 1.1. The purpose of this report is to provide members of the Manawatu River Users’ Advisory Group with an update on matters relating to navigation and safety on the Manawatu River and its tributaries. 2. RECOMMENDATION That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 17-94. 3. FINANCIAL IMPACT 3.1. There is no direct financial impact arising from matters discussed in this item. 4. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 4.1. This is a public item and therefore Council may deem this to be sufficient to advise the public 5. SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS RISK IMPACT 5.1. There is no significant business risk from matters discussed in this item. 6. BACKGROUND 6.1. This report covers the period 26 November 2016 to 18 May 2017. 7. RIVER EVENTS 7.1. The annual meeting and BBQ for Honorary Enforcement Officers and support organisations was held at Manawatu Marine Boating Club (MMBC) on 13 December 2016. 7.2. MMBC hosted the New Year fishing competition on 3 January 2017 with 64 people participating on 23 boats. 7.3. The Manawatu Gorge Raft Race planned for 4 February 2017 was cancelled by the organiser. 7.4. The Manawatu Power Boat Club held the MTF Kapiti Gold Cup regatta on 11-12 March 2017 at Whirokino. A temporary reservation was granted with a public notice placed in the Manawatu Standard on 25 February 2017. 7.5. The Sailing Division of MMBC conducted their sailing programme on the Manawatu Estuary with the last event for the season held on Saturday 29 April 2017. Events included a regatta on the Manawatu Estuary on the weekend of 18-19 March 2017. 7.6. MMBC also hosted the Easter fishing competition but inclement weather restricted fishing to Sunday 16 June only. There were 325 entries on 103 boats. Harbourmaster's Report Page 1 Manawatu River Users' Advisory Group 06 June 2017 7.7. On Sunday 7 June 2017 Jet Boating New Zealand Central Districts Branch conducted a river run with four boats from Palmerston North to the Manawatu Gorge and back. Launching took place at Albert Street. 8. GENERAL COMMENT 8.1. A navigation and safety hazard exists on the Manawatu River near Te Matai Road. In April, severe erosion of the true left bank left a number of railway irons exposed in the new main channel. The railway irons were part of a Horizons Regional Council erosion control structure and will be removed as soon as possible however this is unlikely to happen until the river returns to summer flows. 8.2. Horizons River Management Group will mark the hazard with buoys as soon as river conditions allow. Jet Boating NZ Central Districts has been informed and have notified their members. 8.3. New bylaw and safety information signs have ben installed at the MMBC launching ramp in Foxton Beach and at Whirokino. 9. MANDATORY USE OF LIFE JACKETS – RESPONSIBILITIES AND ENFORCEMENT OPTIONS 9.1. At the December 2016 meeting Cr Kelly moved a motion requesting the Harbourmaster outline responsibilities and enforcement options for the Regional Council to impose the Harbourmaster's Report Page 2 Manawatu River Users' Advisory Group 06 June 2017 mandatory use of lifejackets for events held on the Manawatu River. The motion arose out of discussion over the adequacy of provisions in the Manawatu River and Tributaries Navigation and Safety Bylaw 2010 to ensure safety of participants during events such as the Manawatu Gorge Raft Race. This pertains particularly to the mandatory wearing of personal flotation devices (PFDs). 9.2. Maritime Rule Part 91 requires that skippers must carry a correctly sized PFD for each person on board. This is a legal requirement that applies to all boats, including tenders and larger craft. 9.3. Maritime rules provide that it’s the skipper’s legal responsibility to ensure that PFDs are worn in situations of heightened risk, such as when crossing a bar, in rough water, during an emergency, and by non-swimmers. If they are not worn, PFDs must be stored so that they are immediately available in case of an emergency. 9.4. The Manawatu River and Tributaries Navigation and Safety Bylaw 2010 (the Bylaw) has slightly different wording in that it requires PFDs to be worn unless the skipper expressly gives permission for them not to be worn. The skipper must not give that permission unless conditions are such “that there is no significant increase in risk to safety to any person caused by not wearing a personal flotation device”. 9.5. Organised and semi-organised raft events present a unique set of challenges for Horizons in its administration of the Bylaw. In this context the skipper of a raft is likely to be loosely designated and that person may also be unaware of their responsibilities. 9.6. A brief review of navigation and safety bylaws around New Zealand has revealed only Tasman requires organised water activities to be applied for and approved. Most bylaws, like ours, only require an application to be made if the organiser’s want to reserve an area for the event, or if a speed restriction suspension needed. 9.7. While the Bylaw could be strengthened with a requirement for organisers to apply to Council, this would introduce a significant administrative overhead when, in almost all cases, clubs and organisations have proven they are highly capable of running events safely and in full compliance with the Bylaw and Maritime Rules. 9.8. In the specific case of the Manawatu Gorge Raft Race, it may be possible to specify the mandatory on-water safety requirements during Tararua District Council’s event approval process (for the use of Woodville Ferry Reserve). 9.9. In summary, the provisions of the bylaw regarding PFD use, event management and enforcement are considered adequate but should be revisited when the bylaw is next reviewed, however the formal review is not due until 2020. In the meantime, a combined approach with key Manawatu Gorge stakeholders, particularly Tararua District Council, should ensure raft events through the Gorge are managed appropriately. 10. SIGNIFICANCE 10.1. This is not a significant decision according to the Council’s Policy on Significance and Engagement. Evan Lloyd Ged Shirley RISK MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR GROUP MANAGER REGIONAL SERVICES & INFORMATION ANNEXES There are no attachments for this report. Harbourmaster's Report Page 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Geology of the Wairarapa Area
    GEOLOGY OF THE WAIRARAPA AREA J. M. LEE J.G.BEGG (COMPILERS) New International NewZOaland Age International New Zealand 248 (Ma) .............. 8~:~~~~~~~~ 16 il~ M.- L. Pleistocene !~ Castlecliffian We £§ Sellnuntian .~ Ozhulflanl Makarewan YOm 1.8 100 Wuehlaplngien i ~ Gelaslan Cl Nukumaruan Wn ~ ;g '"~ l!! ~~ Mangapanlan Ql -' TatarianiMidian Ql Piacenzlan ~ ~;: ~ u Wai i ian 200 Ian w 3.6 ,g~ J: Kazanlan a.~ Zanetaan Opoitian Wo c:: 300 '"E Braxtonisn .!!! .~ YAb 256 5.3 E Kunaurian Messinian Kapitean Tk Ql ~ Mangapirian YAm 400 a. Arlinskian :;; ~ l!!'" 500 Sakmarian ~ Tortonisn ,!!! Tongaporutuan Tt w'" pre-Telfordian Ypt ~ Asselian 600 '" 290 11.2 ~ 700 'lii Serravallian Waiauan 5w Ql ." i'l () c:: ~ 600 J!l - fl~ '§ ~ 0'" 0 0 ~~ !II Lillburnian 51 N 900 Langhian 0 ~ Clifdenian 5e 16.4 ca '1000 1 323 !II Z'E e'" W~ A1tonian PI oS! ~ Burdigalian i '2 F () 0- w'" '" Dtaian Po ~ OS Waitakian Lw U 23.8 UI nlan ~S § "t: ." Duntroonian Ld '" Chattian ~ W'" 28.5 P .Sll~ -''" Whalngaroan Lwh O~ Rupelian 33.7 Late Priabonian ." AC 37.0 n n 0 I ~~ ~ Bortonian Ab g; Lutetisn Paranaen Do W Heretauncan Oh 49.0 354 ~ Mangaorapan Om i Ypreslan .;;: w WalD8wsn Ow ~ JU 54.8 ~ Thanetlan § 370 t-- §~ 0'" ~ Selandian laurien Dt ." 61.0 ;g JM ~"t: c:::::;; a.os'"w Danian 391 () os t-- 65.0 '2 Maastrichtian 0 - Emslsn Jzl 0 a; -m Haumurian Mh :::;; N 0 t-- Campanian ~ Santonian 0 Pragian Jpr ~ Piripauan Mp W w'" -' t-- Coniacian 1ij Teratan Rt ...J Lochovlan Jlo Turonian Mannaotanean Rm <C !II j Arowhanan Ra 417 0- Cenomanian '" Ngaterian Cn Prldoli
    [Show full text]
  • RESOURCE CONSENT DECISION New Zealand Transport Agency
    RESOURCE CONSENT DECISION New Zealand Transport Agency (Transport Registry Centre Palmerston North) Decision on an application for resource consents to undertake vegetation clearance, land disturbance, discharge to water and drilling in the bed of a river for geotechnical investigations in and around the Manawatū River, Parahaki Island, and At-Risk, Rare and Threatened habitats adjacent to the Manawatū River, associated with Te Ahu a Tūranga - Manawatū Gorge Replacement at SH3, Palmerston North Application Reference: APP-2019202606.00 Decision Date: 26 February 2020 Expiry Date: 26 February 2022 Application Summary Proposal The New Zealand Transport Agency (the Applicant) has applied for resource consents to enable geotechnical investigations to inform the design and construction of the Te Ahu a Turanga (Manawatū Tararua Highway project). The Applicant has requested that the works be considered as two distinct locations as follows: 1. Up to six boreholes located to the immediate east of Parahaki Island, within the bed of the Manawatū River and the true left bank of the Manawatū River; and 2. Up to 13 boreholes located on land on the true right of the Manawatū River, and adjacent land on Raupo dominated seepage wetland and within Old Growth forest, which are considered to be At- Risk, Rare or Threatened habitats in Schedule F of the One Plan. The application notes that for some locations, 2-3 boreholes maybe required, with the final number being dependent on the geotechnical findings. The proposed location of the bore holes are shown in Figure one below. Figure 1 - Borehole locations The proposed boreholes are proposed to range between 0-70m in depth, with a casing size of 102mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Manawatu Gorge POU 'WHATONGA'
    Manawatu Gorge POU ‘WHATONGA’ The Manawatu gorge which is situated approx 20km East of Palmerston North connects the Manawatu region to the Hawkes Bay region. It’s a unique piece of the region and is the only place in New Zealand where a river begins its journey on the opposite side of the main divide to where it joins the sea. This vital transport route is steeped in history and as we have come to know recently its steep rock faces and gorse covered hills are extremely prone to erosion with rock falls and road closures being an all too common occurrence. As part of the 10 year Manawatu Gorge Biodiversity Project (2006 -2016) the construction of information Whare at the end of the gorge, gave the opportunity to tell the story or the history of the gorge. A main feature of this story was the construction of a Pou of Whatonga which seeks to bring to life the spirit of the Manawatu Gorge and rekindle the links with its people. The Pou of Whatonga stands 6 meters tall and is an iconic expression of the spirit of this location. Designed by Artist Paul Horton and manufactured by Martin Engineering in Palmerston North the large structure made up of pipes and rolled plates that had been intricately cut to form an impressive and imposing piece that will tell the story for generations to come. Early talks with the artist made sure that the item was able to be dipped in a way that eliminated zinc traps whilst taking nothing away from the overall design.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads to Rivers in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region: an Analysis of Low Flow State
    MANAGING OUR ENVIRONMENT Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads to Rivers in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region : An Analysis of Low Flow State : Technical Report to Support Policy Development Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads to Rivers in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region: An Analysis of Low Flow State Technical Report to Support Policy Development August 2007 Authors Kate McArthur and Maree Clark Acknowledgements to Jon Roygard, Marianne Watson and the Environmental Compliance Team Internal Review Greg Bevin – Senior Environmental Compliance Officer Jeff Watson – Manager Resource Data External Review Bob Wilcock and Neale Hudson, NIWA Graham Sevicke-Jones, Hawkes Bay Regional Council Kirsten Meijer, Environment Southland August 2007 ISBN: 1-877413-81-X Report No: 2007/EXT/793 CONTACT 24hr Freephone 0508 446 749 [email protected] www.horizons.govt.nz Kairanga Palmerston North Dannevirke Cnr Rongotea & 11-15 Victoria Avenue Weber Road, P O Box 201 Kairanga-Bunnythorpe Rds Private Bag 11 025 Dannevirke 4942 Palmerston North Manawatu Mail Centre Palmerston North 4442 Levin 11 Bruce Road, P O Box 680 Marton T 06 952 2800 Levin 5540 Hammond Street F 06 952 2929 SERVICE REGIONAL P O Box 289 DEPOTS Pahiatua CENTRES Marton 4741 HOUSES Cnr Huxley & Queen Streets Wanganui P O Box 44 181 Guyton Street Pahiatua 4941 Taumarunui P O Box 515 34 Maata Street Wanganui Mail Centre Taihape P O Box 194 Wanganui 4540 Torere Road, Ohotu Taumarunui 3943 F 06 345 3076 P O Box 156 Taihape 4742 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The growth of nuisance periphyton in many rivers and streams of the Manawatu- Wanganui Region is a significant environmental issue, requiring the reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus loads to surface water.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 87F Report to Waka Kotahi Nz Transport Agency
    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency to Manawatu Whanganui Regional Council for resource consents associated with the construction and operation of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway. SECTION 87F REPORT TO WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL 25 May 2020 Section 87F Report APP-2017201552.00 - Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway 1 Prepared by Mark St.Clair – Planning A. OUTLINE OF REPORT 1 This report, required by section 87F of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”), addresses the issues set out in sections 104 to 112 of the RMA, to the extent that they are relevant to the applications lodged with the Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council (“Horizons”) The consents applied for, by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (the “Transport Agency”) are required to authorise the construction, operation and maintenance of the Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway (the “Project”). 2 In addition, the Transport Agency separately applied for a Notice of Requirement (“NoR”) to Palmerston North City Council (“PNCC”), Tararua District Council (“TDC”) and Manawatu District Council (“MDC”). The Environment Court confirmed the designation for the Project, including a more northern alignment (discussed later in this section 87F report), subject to conditions, on 23 March 2020. While this section 87F report only addresses the applications lodged with MWRC, the designation and the associated conditions have also been considered as part of the assessment. 3 This report has been prepared in accordance with section 87F of the RMA which sets out the matters the report must cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025
    Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2025 Month and Y 1 2 Contents Introduction from the Chairman ............................................................................................. 5 Section 1: Context of the Regional Land Transport Plan ....................................................... 7 1.1 Purpose of the Plan ................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Responsibilities of Transport Organisations ............................................................ 7 1.2.1 Central Government ......................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Regional and Local Government ...................................................................... 8 1.3 The National and Regional policy context ............................................................... 8 1.3.1 Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2015 ................................... 8 1.3.2 New Zealand Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy 2011-2016 ........... 8 1.3.3 The One Plan................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Process for the Development of the Plan ................................................................ 9 Section 2: The Strategic Context ......................................................................................... 11 2.1 Setting the Scene – The Manawatu-Wanganui Region ......................................... 11 2.1.1 Geography ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Transport Resilience
    Measuring Transport Resilience A Manawatu-Wanganui Region Case Study Muhammad Imran, Christine Cheyne & John Harold Resource & Environmental Planning Programme School of People, Environment and Planning Massey University, New Zealand Massey University Research Online 2014 Executive summary The resilience of transport networks is attracting greater scrutiny at the international, national and sub-national levels. This research report explores the current state of knowledge about measuring transport resilience and presents a case study to address the question is: How resilient is the road and rail infrastructure in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region? This region in New Zealand’s lower North Island provides an interesting case study due to its strategic location in the North Island’s and indeed New Zealand’s transport network. In addition, it has experienced significant disruptions in the recent past, most notably widespread failures caused by flooding in 2004, and the lengthy closure of a significant inter-regional road connection, the Manawatu Gorge State Highway 3 road, due to a landslide in 2011-2012. It also provides an opportunity to explore this topic outside of a major metropolitan region. The region’s transport networks and infrastructure also have important social and economic functions. This research report is structured around a proposed Transport Resilience Indicator Framework (RIF) which explores six key dimensions of transport infrastructure resilience: engineering, services, ecological, social, economic and institutional. This holistic approach to measuring transport resilience and is envisaged to accommodate both qualitative and quantitative indicators. Within this framework, data were gathered via analysis of secondary sources and nine key informant interviews. The interview participants were from public sector agencies responsible for managing aspects of the region’s transport network, the private sector and one social service provider.
    [Show full text]
  • Manawatū-Whanganui Leaders Send Joint Manawatū Gorge Solution Submission
    MEDIA RELEASE 26 October 2017 For immediate release Manawatū-Whanganui leaders send joint Manawatū Gorge solution submission A submission in support of NZTA’s Manawatū Gorge option four has been made by Horizons regional leaders through Accelerate25’s Lead Team Facilitator Michael McCartney. Accelerate25 is a regional economic growth programme which aligns people, policy and funding in priority areas to drive growth and create a more prosperous Manawatū-Whanganui Region by 2025. Led by a governing Lead Team representing business, iwi, central government and seven local territorial authorities, Accelerate25’s aim is to realise the opportunities and enablers identified in the Manawatū-Whanganui Economic Action Plan. One of the plan’s key enablers is distribution and transport, involving a large integrated project team working on enhancing infrastructure around the Central New Zealand distribution hub, including the regional freight ring road that is currently underway. Mr McCartney says based on the information currently available, and in order to meet the submission timeframe, the Lead Team acknowledges that NZTA’s option four alignment is the best solution. “While further details and analysis of the proposal is needed, the southern Manawatū Gorge replacement route shows closer connection to Palmerston North and key freight hubs such as the city’s North East and Feilding’s industrial areas, the distribution hub and airport, through to Tararua and Hawke’s Bay,” says Mr McCartney. “Option four is also preferred as it will directly connect with the regional freight ring road which central government announced funding towards last year and forms part of the Regional Land Transport Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 3671-The Neotectonics of the Ruahine and Mohaka Faults, Between The
    S&G 3671 FINAL PROGRESS REPORT Submitted to EARTHQUAKE AND WAR DAMAGE COMMISSION on the project 'THE NEOTECTONICS OF THE RUAHINE AND MOHAKA FAULTS, BETWEEN THE MANAWATU GORGE AND PUKETITIRI' December 1995 Principal Investigators Associate Professor V E Neall and Ms J A Hanson Department of Soil Science, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North -- 0.-------------------1.. ABSTRACT New Zealand lies across the active IndoAustralian-Pacific plate boundary. Volcanic activity and earthquakes are a direct result of interaction between these two plates. The Wellington and Ruahine Faults are major strike-slip faults that have formed due to this interaction. These faults move sideways in a horizontal motion so that the area west of, and including the Central Ranges is moving northward while the East Coast of the southern North Island is moving southward. If earthquake activity is averaged out on a yearly basis, these two sections of the North Island move past each other at a rate of 5 to 7 mm (for the Wellington area) and up to 15 mm per year for the Dannevirke area. These rates of motion are high by world standards. The purpose of this study was to establish a record of past earthquake events which would allow future estimates of fault behaviour to be made in the region between the Manawatu Gorge and the Napier-Taupo highway. Trenches have been excavated through these faults in mainly swampy environments. Within these trenches are layers of earthquake debris, deformation and layers of peat. The layers of peat have been radiocarbon dated to give the approximate ages of the underlying and overlying earthquake debris.
    [Show full text]
  • Papaioea Year Three
    2020/21 ABMAHERE PŪTEA Ā-TAU ANNUAL BUDGET PAPAIOEA PALMERSTON NORTH CITY YEAR THREE OF THE 10 YEAR PLAN 2018 – 2028 He iti rā, he iti pounamu Te Kaunihera o Papaioea Small city benefits, big city ambition pncc.govt.nz Palmerston North City Council AN INNOVATIVE 1. AND GROWING CITY ONE VISION A CREATIVE 2. AND EXCITING CITY Palmerston North A CONNECTED SMALL CITY BENEFITS 3. AND SAFE COMMUNITY BIG CITY AMBITION 4. AN ECO CITY Five Strategic Goals A DRIVEN AND 5. ENABLING COUNCIL. Introduction INTRODUCTION MAHERE PŪTEA Ā-TAU ANNUAL BUDGET Small City Benefits, Big City Ambition 5 ANNUAL BUDGET 2020/21 | Palmerston North City This Annual Budget was adopted by the Council on 24 June 2020 in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002. The Annual Budget states the Council’s intentions. It is based on the Council’s best information and planning at the time it was developed. If circumstances change, the Council may have to change its intentions. This is especially the case in light of current uncertain economic conditions. All the decisions in this document are reviewable, especially during future 10 Year Plans and Annual Budgets This is made clear in the Local Government Act 2002, Section 96: (1) The effect of a long-term plan and an annual plan adopted by a local authority is to provide a formal and public statement of the local authority’s intentions in relation to the matters covered by the plan. (2) A resolution to adopt a long-term plan or an annual plan does not constitute a decision to act on any specific matter included within the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Manawatu River Fishery
    n o gi Re ellington W Vickerman Road - this is private. is this - Road Vickerman www.fishandgame.org.nz d n a d a o R e r e K e r e K s k n i l t a h t k c a r t d e m r o f e h t e s u T O N O D Fax: 06 356 2780 356 06 Fax: . r e v i r e h t o t y l t c e r i d k l a w d n a p u k r a P . ) d a o R o n i k o r i h W o t n i t f e l Telephone: 06 359 0409 359 06 Telephone: d n a d a o R e r e K e r e K o t n i t h g i r , d a o R s g n i r p S o t n i d a o R n o n n a h S Palmerston North Palmerston n o t x o F e h t f f o t f e l g n i n r u t y b d a o R n a m r e k c i V s s e c c a r o ( d n e P O Box 1325 Box O P e h t o t l e v a r t d n a d a o R n a m r e k c i V o t d a o R o n i k o r i h W g n o l a n o n Regio ton g in l l e W y r r a c y l e v i t a n r e t l A .
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentation, Metal Contamination and Coastal Landscape Stability Of
    Report prepared for the Department of Conservation Sedimentation, metal contamination and coastal landscape stability of the Manawatu River Estuary: Environmental Status of the Ramsar-Listed wetland and future monitoring programme Prepared by: Josephine Woods and Dr David M. Kennedy School of Geography, Environment & Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington November 2008 1 Executive Summary • This report entails a sediment monitoring program which aims to establish baseline data for monitoring the Manawatu River Estuary. Of specific interest are the sediment characteristics and what are the potential impacts of the marsh area on the northern bank of the estuary. This marsh/ mudflat area is significant bird habitat • Aerial photo analysis of the estuary between 1950 and 2005 shows significant extension (547m) of Fernbird Flat. It also shows fluctuations in the location of the channel entrance, but no significant channel movement towards the marsh area on the northern bank of the estuary. Flood protection works are likely to have stabilised most of the channel movements. Flood events, such as the 2004 flood occur with the greatest amount of channel migration. • Aerial photo analysis also revealed the evolution of a sand spit, which separates the marsh area from the main channel. This sand spit has played a significant part in reducing the impact of the river channel on the marsh. • A significant increase in the area of vegetated dunes over time is also evident in the aerial photo analysis. This signifies a decrease in wind erosion and dune mobility at the estuary mouth. • Grain size analysis of surfical sediments indicated that most are sourced from aeolian (wind) sources, or fluvial (river) deposits of silts and clays in low energy environments.
    [Show full text]