DOCSLIB.ORG

MAYOR and CABINET Date: WEDNESDAY, 26 FEBRUARY 2003 at 6.30 P.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MAYOR and CABINET Date: WEDNESDAY, 26 FEBRUARY 2003 at 6.30 P.M MAYOR AND CABINET Date: WEDNESDAY, 26 FEBRUARY 2003 at 6.30 p.m. Committee Room 2 **Please note time of meeting** Civic Suite Lewisham Town Hall A London SE6 4RU A Enquiries to: Mike Brown Telephone: 020-8-314-8824 (direct line) G G MEMBERS The Mayor (Steve Bullock) (L) Chair E Councillor Moore (L) Vice-Chair and Deputy Mayor E Councillor Best (L) Cabinet Member for Environment Councillor Donnelly (L) Cabinet Member for Lifelong Learning Councillor Garcha (L) Cabinet Member for Social Inclusion N Councillor Holder (L) Cabinet Member for Social Care & Health N Councillor McGarrigle (L) Cabinet Member for Culture Councillor Whiting (L) Cabinet Member for Resources Councillor Wise (L) Cabinet Member for Housing and Community D Safety D Members are summoned to attend this meeting Barry Quirk A A Chief Executive Lewisham Town Hall Catford London SE6 4RU Date: 18 February 2003 The public are welcome to attend our committee meetings, however, occasionally, committees may have to Consider some business in private. Copies of reports can be made available in additional formats on request. w:\comms web team\web\ongoing_work\myr_cab_ag_26feb03.doc ORDER OF BUSINESS - PART 1 AGENDA Item Page No. No. 1 Declarations of Interests 1 2 Exclusion of the Press and Public 1 3 Transport: Parking Works Programme 3 4 Secondary School Strategy - Consultation on New Secondary School 16 and Expansion of Deptford Green The public are welcome to attend our Committee meetings, however, occasionally committees may have to consider some business in private. Copies of reports can be made in additional formats on request. w:\comms web team\web\ongoing_work\myr_cab_ag_26feb03.doc MAYOR AND CABINET Report Title DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS Key Decision Item No. 1 Ward Contributors CHIEF EXECUTIVE Class Part 1 Date: 26 FEBRUARY 2003 Members are asked to make any declarations of pecuniary interests or other interests they may have in relation to items on this agenda (if any). Members are reminded to make any declaration at any stage throughout the meeting if it then becomes apparent that this may be required when a particular item or issue is considered. MAYOR AND CABINET Report Title EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC Key Decision Item No. 2 Ward Contributors CHIEF EXECUTIVE Class Part 1 Date: 26 FEBRUARY 2003 Recommendation It is recommended that under Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraphs 3, 7 and 9 of Part 1 of Schedule 12(A) of the Act:- 101 The Future of the Bell Green Shopping Parade plus Residential Upper Part at Nos. 50-84 (even) Bell Green, Sydenham, SE26 w:\comms web team\web\ongoing_work\myr_cab_ag_26feb03.doc MAYOR AND CABINET Report Title TRANSPORT: PARKING WORKS PROGRAMME Key Decision YES Item No. 3 Ward All Contributors EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR REGENERATION Class Part 1 Date: 26 FEBRUARY 2003 1. Summary This report provides an update on the work being undertaken on proposed controlled parking schemes and suggests new guidelines for the consultation process for future schemes. 2. Purpose To review the progress on existing parking schemes; set out the options in relation to two contentious schemes. To agree new guidelines in relation to consultation/ decision process. 3. Recommendations It is recommended that: 3.1 the Priority list set out in paragraph (6) be approved as a basis for the works programme for 2003/04; 3.2 where practicable other types of controls other than full scale CPZ's be considered and offered during the consultation process on the possible introduction of parking controls; 3.3 should the overall response to a consultation on the detailed design of a parking scheme fall below 10% the consultation exercise be deemed inconclusive, 3.4 if a response rate of over 10% has been achieved on the detailed design of a scheme, the analysis of the results should indicate a clear mandate weighted at least 55/45. If a clear mandate is not achieved the scheme should not be progressed; w:\comms web team\web\ongoing_work\myr_cab_ag_26feb03.doc 3.5 apart from the consultation document, street notices should be placed within the boundary of the proposed area throughout the informal consultation period to ensure both residents and businesses are fully aware that the consultation is being undertaken; 3.6 Aislibie and Lenham roads are added to the Old Road/ Bankwell CPZ. That controls are not introduced in Lampmead, Brightfield, Murillo, Rembrandt and Abernethy roads. In addition, the northern end of Manor, Lane as far as numbers 20-22 and the northern end of Manor Lane Terrace as far as numbers 13-14 be added to the Old Road/ Bankwell CPZ; and 3.7 the proposed Rushey Green East CPZ be implemented with the exception of Thornford Road. 4 Background 4.1 The Parking Plan contains a list of areas (listed in order of priority) to be investigated to see if there is demand for some form of parking control. It is difficult to derive a straightforward data led ranking system for parking, therefore the ranking of areas has been carried out on the basis of qualitative assessments, requests from residents and local knowledge of access and other problems. 4.2 In the past initial consultation in some areas has been carried out sooner rather than later due to external funding being available. However, it is very difficult for residents to form a view as to whether they will want parking controls before an expected problem arises. In particular, investigations into areas prior to the introduction of congestion charging by TfL have proved problematic. These problems stemming from the fact that at the time of consultation, parking problems did not necessarily exist and the likely impact of congestion charging was not yet known. 5. Implementation of Parking Controls 5.1 A substantial amount of work implementing parking controls has been carried out since the Parking Plan was agreed in 2001 and reviewed in January 2003. 5.2 The areas for investigation were selected from information collated on the traffic engineering database. This included requests from residents, businesses, etc. 5.3 It should be noted that the driver for the introduction of parking controls is the safeguarding of resident amenity in respect of ability to park relatively near to their place of residence during the day and permit the adequate servicing of properties for deliveries etc. There is also a beneficial impact on street scene, road safety and the general environment. Parking controls are not however introduced primarily to promote modal shift by car users. Most importantly it should be emphasized that schemes are not introduced to raise income, although all schemes should be self-financing. w:\comms web team\web\ongoing_work\myr_cab_ag_26feb03.doc Schemes are only introduced where there is a majority of people in favour and as such there is a clear mandate for their implementation. 6. The progress on current schemes is as follows: 6.1 Hither Green (West) CPZ Statutory Consultation period has finished. There were several objections to the scheme. These have been considered and it was agreed to proceed with the scheme. The implementation date is scheduled for March 2003. 6.2 Catford (West) CPZ Statutory Consultation period finished. No objections received. Decision to Proceed. Implementation date scheduled for March 2003. 6.3 Canadian Ave CPZ Statutory Consultation finished on 5th February 2003. No objections were received. 6.4 Grove Park CPZ (Extension) Statutory Consultation period finished. Two new roads have been added to the existing scheme. Implementation date March 2003. 6.5 Hatcham Area CPZ A consultation on a possible parking scheme is presently being carried out. This will give residents an opportunity to say if they want a parking scheme considered in order to address possible problems as a result of the Congestion Charging Scheme. 6.6 Evelyn Area CPZ A consultation on a possible parking scheme is presently being carried out. This will give residents an opportunity to say if they would want a parking scheme considered in order to address possible problems as a result of the Congestion Charging Scheme. 6.7 Rushey Green West CPZ This scheme was introduced in 2001. A review of the scheme has been carried out. Within the scheme better use of some of the available parking could be achieved by allowing more shared use bays. This will w:\comms web team\web\ongoing_work\myr_cab_ag_26feb03.doc provide more parking for visitors and shoppers to the area. Some space (50 permits) could also be made available for hospital staff. The proposed changes should not unduly effect the residential parking benefits of the scheme. The proposed changes will be subject to the statutory consultation process in the next few months. 6.8 Old Road/ Bankwell Road: 6.8.1 A consultation on area traffic calming was carried out in the Manor Lee Ward in 2001. As part of this consultation residents and businesses in the area were asked if they would welcome a Controlled Parking Zone for their area. Most roads in the area voted against the idea of a parking scheme and therefore it was agreed that a scheme should not be implemented in the area. However, in Old Road and Bankwell Road there was a majority of residents in favour of controlled parking and a significant amount of lobbying in favour of a parking scheme was received. It was therefore agreed to carry out a further consultation in these two roads. For this consultation an outline design of a scheme was prepared. A consultation letter/questionnaire together with a plan of the proposals was sent to all the properties in these two roads and on the adjacent section of Lee High Road.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schools Forum Data Sept 11.Xlsx
    Schools Forum London Borough of Lewisham Absence Between 01/09/2010 and 31/08/2011 21 September 2011 Item 3 Appendix 1 Sum: Avg FTE Avg Days Brockley Primary School 512.40 27.64 18.54 Greenvale School 1,106.32 60.42 18.31 St Josephs RC Primary School 352.34 20.41 17.27 St Marys CE Primary School 459.91 26.74 17.20 Abbey Manor College 1,102.10 70.72 15.58 Holy Trinity CE Primary School 284.89 18.97 15.02 Lucas Vale Primary School 525.97 35.55 14.80 St James Hatcham CE Primary School 373.70 25.72 14.53 Torridon Infant School 402.10 28.97 13.88 Prendergast Ladywell Fields Sec Sch 1,090.80 79.49 13.72 Forster Park Primary School 632.14 47.53 13.30 Sandhurst Junior School 388.56 30.43 12.77 Meadowgate School 493.16 39.73 12.41 Watergate School 784.18 64.09 12.24 Crossways 6th Form 758.96 62.36 12.17 Perrymount Primary School 429.28 35.32 12.15 Edmund Waller Primary School 533.64 45.12 11.83 Chelwood Nursery School 201.72 17.07 11.82 Lewisham Bridge Primary School 321.39 28.70 11.20 Brindishe Green Primary School 626.85 57.19 10.96 Pendragon School 377.47 35.63 10.59 Elfrida Primary School 471.84 45.15 10.45 Sandhurst Infant School 320.38 31.86 10.06 Conisborough College 899.44 95.22 9.45 Sir Francis Drake Primary School 239.23 25.46 9.40 Trinity Lewisham CE Secondary School 464.23 50.01 9.28 Myatt Garden Primary School 397.04 43.23 9.18 John Stainer Primary School 232.52 25.64 9.07 Adamsrill Primary School 335.57 37.04 9.06 St Mary Magdalen's RC Primary School 183.91 20.45 8.99 Launcelot Primary School 372.00 42.87 8.68 Deptford Green Secondary
    [Show full text]
  • UCAS Teacher Training End of Cycle 2017 Data Resources UTT3 002 01 Acceptances by Provider and Domicile
    UCAS Teacher Training End of Cycle 2017 Data Resources UTT3_002_01 Acceptances by provider and domicile Statistic: Acceptances Variables: Provider Name, Applicant Domicile (UK/EU/Not EU), Cycle Year Coverage: All Definitions Provider Name The UCAS Teacher Training provider at the time of the application. This does not take into account any mergers or rebrands, for example if Provider A and Provider B merged to become Provider A in 2016, all applications and acceptances will be reported as Provider A from 2016 onwards. Prior to 2016 all applications and acceptances will be reported as Provider A or Provider B as appropriate. Applicant Domicile (UK/EU/Not EU) Applicant's area of permanent residence summarised at a high level. This variable is derived from domicile as declared by the applicant. Split by the following values: 'UK' , 'EU (excluding UK)' and 'Not EU'. Please note: The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man have been assigned as 'Not EU'. See the additional technical notes at www.ucas.com for coverage and trends for Scotland. Cycle Year The application year in which the application was processed. Acceptances An acceptance is defined as an applicant who has been accepted to start a programme through the UCAS Teacher Training scheme. End of Cycle 2017 Data Resources: UTT3_002_01. UCAS Analysis and Insights, published on Thursday 17 May 2018 at www.ucas.com UCAS: UTT3_002_01 Acceptances by provider and domicile (All) Acceptances by Cycle Year Provider Name, Applicant Domicile (UK/EU/Not EU) 2014 2015 2016 2017 T92 - 2Schools Consortium
    [Show full text]
  • MGLA260719-8697 Date
    Our ref: MGLA260719-8697 Date: 22 August 2018 Dear Thank you for your request for information which the GLA received on 26 June 2019. Your request has been dealt with under the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR) 2004. Our response to your request is as follows: 1. Please provide the precise number and list of locations/names of primary and secondary schools in London where air pollution breaches legal limit, according to your most recent data (I believe the same metric has been used across the years, of annual mean limit of 40ug/m3 NO2, but please clarify). If you are able to provide more recent data without breaching the s12 time limit please do. If not, please provide underlying data from May 2018 (see below). Please provide as a spreadsheet with school name, pollution level, and any location information such as borough. This data is available on the London datastore. The most recent available data is from the London Atmospheric Emission Inventory (LAEI) 2016 and was published in April 2019. The data used for the 2018 report is LAEI 2013. Please find attached a list and a summary of all Educational Establishments in London and NO2 levels based on both the LAEI 2013 update and LAEI 2016. The list has been taken from the register of educational establishments in England and Wales, maintained by the Department for Education, and provides information on establishments providing compulsory, higher and further education. It was downloaded on 21/03/2019, just before the release of the LAEI 2016. The attached spreadsheet has recently been published as part of the LAEI 2016 stats on Datastore here.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 Published February 2018 Challenge Partners is a Contents 1. THE PARTNERSHIP 2 practitioner-led education About Challenge Partners 3 Message from the Chief Executive 4 charity that enables Our principles and approach 6 collaboration between Challenge Partners by numbers 10 2. OUR COLLECTIVE AIMS 12 It is possible to have both excellence 13 schools to enhance the and equity in our education system Our aims 16 life chances of all children, Impact and performance against our aims 17 3. THE PROGRAMMES 20 especially the most Our programmes 21 The Network of Excellence 22 disadvantaged. Hubs 24 The Quality Assurance Review 27 Leadership Development Days 32 Leadership Residency Programme 32 School Support Directory 32 Events 33 Challenge the Gap 34 Getting Ahead London 40 EAL in the mainstream classroom 43 4. FINANCES 44 Income and expenditure 44 5. LOOKING FORWARD 45 6. LIST OF CHALLENGE PARTNERS SCHOOLS 46 1. The partnership About Challenge Partners Challenge Partners is a practitioner-led education charity that enables collaborative school improvement networks to enhance the life chances of all children, especially the most disadvantaged. Challenge Partners was formed to continue the learning which emerged from the development of Teaching Schools that evolved out of the London Challenge. Since its formation in 2011, the outcomes for pupils in Challenge Partners schools have consistently improved faster than the national average. We provide networks and programmes that facilitate sustainable collaboration and challenge between schools in order to underpin improvements in outcomes which would not be possible for a school, or group of schools, to achieve as effectively on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Guide Education Guide
    Education guide Education guide Introduction Immediately east of Canary Wharf, the Royal Docks is emerging as a new district for business and culture in London. Over £8bn in investment is flowing into the area over the next 20 years. Improvements to transport, streets and open spaces are underway, preparing for an estimated 24% population growth in the wider area.¹ At the heart of the Royal Docks we’re creating a new place to call home. Globally renowned architects, Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, are the studio behind 35 Hudson Yards in New York, Dubai’s Burj Khalifa, the China World Trade Centre in Beijing — and now Royal Eden Docks. These homes have wellbeing designed in. Light-filled, thoughtfully laid out, with landscaped garden space for all — 5,000 sq m of it in total. Two private, leafy courtyards. Green rooftops. 17 fitness and relaxation amenities. All less than 100 metres from the water’s edge. It’s just a three-minute walk to Custom House station, where Crossrail services are set to begin in 2020. That gets you to Canary Wharf in three minutes and The City in 10. A new district for London designed around health and wellbeing, with landscaped green space at its heart. This is Royal Eden Docks. A new street linking to Custom House (Crossrail and DLR) 01 ¹GLA, 2019: Population Projections, London Borough of Newham and Royal Victoria (DLR) station 02 Education guide A British Education 30 primary schools, 15 secondary schools and three colleges with an ‘Outstanding’ Ofsted rating, less than three miles from Royal Eden Docks.2 British education is internationally renowned and remains at the forefront of educational innovation and creativity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewisham's Determined Admissions Criteria For
    Appendix A Lewisham’s proposed admissions criteria for nursery schools and nursery classes in community primary schools (children starting nursery during the academic year 2022/23) Where there is over-subscription, places will be offered to: 1 A looked after child’ or a child who was previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to an adoption, child arrangements, or special guardianship order. A looked after child is a child who is a) in the care of a local authority, or b) being provided with accommodation by a local authority in the exercise of their social services functions (see definition in Section 22(1) of the Children Act 1989). Details must be supplied by the allocated social worker or foster carer. .* it is expected that a revised School Admissions Code, expected early in 2020, will revise the definition of a looked after child to include children who have been adopted from care from outside of England. 2 In exceptional circumstances there is discretion to admit vulnerable children, as proposed by Lewisham’s Children Centre Criteria for Priority or Excluded (POE), on the grounds of their or their family’s severe medical or social need for that particular school and who would not otherwise qualify for admission. The application must be supported by a letter from a hospital consultant, social worker or similar professional, setting out the reasons why the nursery is the only one able to meet the child’s needs, before an admission decision is made. The admission decision will be made by the headteacher who may consult with the Executive Director for Children and Young People.
    [Show full text]
  • School Organisation and Investment Strategy 2018
    Westminster City Council School Organisation and Investment Strategy 2018 Date: August 2018 Westminster City Council School Organisation and Investment Strategy 2018 Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………….4 1. Purpose .............................................................................................. 10 2. Background ........................................................................................ 10 3. Borough Context ................................................................................ 11 4. Greater London Authority (GLA) School Roll Projections (SRP) ......... 12 5. Independent School Sector ................................................................ 13 6. Primary School Place Planning ........................................................... 13 6.1. Primary Planning Area .................................................................. 14 6.2. Local Factors ............................................................................... 15 6.3. Primary Pupil Projections ............................................................... 15 6.4. Supply and Demand ..................................................................... 16 6.5. Primary School Applications and Offers ........................................... 17 6.6. Surplus Places ............................................................................. 12 6.7. Primary Mobility ........................................................................... 19 6.8. Primary Population Trends and Cross Border Movement ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Register Information As at 8/12/16
    LB Lewisham Asset Register Information as at 8/12/16 Address Post Code UPRN Easting Northing Asset Type 1 Baudwin Road SE6 1RN 100023276823 539174 172717 Building 1 Catford Broadway, Ground Floor SE6 4SP 100023278993 537491 173623 Building 1 Loampit Hill Lewisham SE13 7TH 100023236075 537707 175926 Building 1 Turnham Road SE4 2HH 100023271793 536036 175252 Building 1 Winslade Way SE6 4JU 100023570595 537657 173730 Building 1&2 Golden Hind Place Grove Street SE8 3QG 200000556723 536518 178570 Building 1&2 High Level Drive SE26 6XT 100021968146 534268 171616 Building 10 & 22 Wild Goose Drive SE14 5LL 100023237249 535447 176685 Building 10 Wisteria Road Hither Green SE13 5HN 100023570601 538628 175143 Building 10/13 Winslade Way SE6 4JU 100023570592 537645 173772 Building 100 Granville Park SE13 7EA 200002507131 538685 176123 Building 103 105 Rushey Green SE6 4AF 10091634608 537826 173892 Building 106 Woodpecker Road SE14 6EU 100023238097 536344 177557 Building 108 Woodpecker Road SE14 6EU 100023238099 536341 177561 Building 109 Randlesdown Road Bellingham SE6 3HB 10090787253 537561 172154 Building 109A Randlesdown Road Bellingham SE6 3HB 10023226839 537584 172117 Building 10A Wisteria Road Hither Green SE13 5HN 100023233560 538616 175138 Building 110 Woodpecker Road SE14 6EU 100023238779 536339 177564 Building 111 Randlesdown Road Bellingham SE6 3HB 100023277936 537559 172145 Building 111 Rolt Street SE8 5JZ 100023282163 536359 177754 Building 112-114 New Cross Road SE14 5BA 10023232359 535614 177021 Land 114 Woodpecker Road SE14 6EU 100023238090
    [Show full text]
  • May 2017 Open Letter to the Prime Minister Theresa May
    May 2017 Open letter to the Prime Minister Theresa May, As leaders of education across the London Borough of Lewisham, we want to draw attention to the damage being caused to the education of children in our schools by the reduction in funding that is available for us to spend directly on their education. We are concerned that your pledge in your manifesto will be of little help to our schools, children and young people. We are aware of the regularly stated position of your government asserting that you are putting more money than ever before into schools. What you fail to point out is that schools are having to use an increasing proportion of their budgets to cover rising costs relating to national insurance and pension contributions, and escalating costs of services, leaving an ever decreasing balance for us to deliver the quality of education that we and our staff teams are committed to delivering. Even if per pupil funding levels for primary and secondary schools are frozen at current rates, anticipated inflationary pressures over the next three years mean an 8% real terms cut in schools spending power which will impact on our classrooms. Maintained nursery schools in Lewisham are already losing nearly 36% of their funding with the introduction of the Early Years funding formula in April this year. For all of our schools this level of cuts is untenable and will impact directly on the quality of education delivered to our young people. Whilst in all schools we will do our best to meet our statutory duties, the quality of this provision, and our ability to meet the individual needs of different groups will be severely compromised.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewisham Determined Admissions Criteria 2022-2023
    Appendix A Lewisham’s determined admissions criteria for nursery schools and nursery classes in community primary schools (children starting nursery during the academic year 2022/23) Where there is over-subscription, places will be offered to: 1. A looked after child’ or a child who was previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to an adoption, child arrangements, or special guardianship order. A looked after child is a child who is a) in the care of a local authority, or b) being provided with accommodation by a local authority in the exercise of their social services functions (see definition in Section 22(1) of the Children Act 1989). Details must be supplied by the allocated social worker or foster carer. * it is expected that a revised School Admissions Code, expected early in 2021, will revise the definition of a looked after child to include children who have been adopted from care from outside of England. 2 In exceptional circumstances there is discretion to admit vulnerable children, as proposed by Lewisham’s Children Centre Criteria for Priority or Excluded (POE), on the grounds of their or their family’s severe medical or social need for that particular school and who would not otherwise qualify for admission. The application must be supported by a letter from a hospital consultant, social worker or similar professional, setting out the reasons why the nursery is the only one able to meet the child’s needs, before an admission decision is made. The admission decision will be made by the headteacher who may consult with the Executive Director for Children and Young People.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 - Animal Welfare Charter Consultation October – December 2016
    Appendix 2 - Animal Welfare Charter Consultation October – December 2016 Consultation Activity How / Who General Promoting of Website Survey Lewisham and EnviroLewishamTwitter Lewisham Life E-Zine Staff on the Employee Notice Board Ward Assembly Co-ordinators Direct Promotion of 170 Community Project Survey 2000 Community Action Centre 5 Steps Community Nursery 60 up club Abacus Day Nursery Abbey Manor College ABC Day Nursery Group Academy Achievers at REAP Youth Club Action for Community Development Action for Refugees in Lewisham Adamsrill Primary School Addey and Stanhope Secondary School Affinity Sutton Afghanistan & Asian Community of London Age Exchange : Number Eleven Age UK Lewisham and Southwark Aging Well In Lewisham LCC All Pets Catford All Saints' Church of England Primary School Amimars Nursery Ashmead Primary School Association Of Tamil Parishioners UK Athelney Primary School Avalon Pre-School & Creche Baby Lambs Day Nursery Baring Primary School BARK Barnes Wallis Centre Battersea Dogs & Cats Home Baxter Fields Bay Tree House Day Nursery Beckenham Place Park Beecroft Primary School Bellingham Community Project Bench outreach Beresford vets Blackheath Joint working party Blackheath Montessori Centre Blackheath Society Blooming Kidz Blossom Years Nursery Bromley Blue Cross Bonus Pastor Catholic College Brindishie Green Primary School Brindishie Lee Primary School Brindishie Manor Primary School Broadfields Nursery Brockley Baptist Church Brockley Society Brookmill Park / Broadway Fields Bunny Hop Day Nursery Burnt Ash Hill
    [Show full text]
  • Borough School Name Postcode Start Year Current Status Barking And
    Borough School name Postcode Start Current status year Barking and Dagenham Becontree Primary School RM8 2QR 2020 Trial Barking and Dagenham Dorothy Barley Junior Academy RM8 2NB 2020 Trial Barking and Dagenham Eastbury Community School IG11 9UW 2020 Trial Barking and Dagenham Grafton Primary School RM8 3EX 2020 Trial Barking and Dagenham Manor Junior School IG11 9AG 2020 Trial Brent Ark Franklin Primary Academy NW6 6HJ 2020 Trial Brent Brentfield Primary School NW10 0SL 2020 Trial Brent Christ Church CofE Primary School NW6 7TE 2020 Trial Brent Claremont High School HA3 0UH 2020 Trial Brent Convent of Jesus and Mary RC Infant School NW2 5AN 2020 Trial Brent Elsley Primary School HA9 6HT 2020 Trial Brent Harlesden Primary School NW10 8UT 2019 Permanent Brent John Keble CofE Primary School NW10 4DR 2020 Trial Brent Kingsbury Green Primary School NW9 9ND 2020 Trial Brent Kingsbury High School NW9 9JR 2020 Trial Brent Leopold Primary School NW10 9UR 2020 Trial Brent Malorees Infant School NW6 7PB 2020 Trial Brent Malorees Junior School NW6 7PB 2020 Trial Brent Maple Walk School NW10 4EB 2020 Trial Brent Mora Primary School NW2 6TD 2020 Trial Brent Mount Stewart Infant School HA3 0JX 2020 Trial Brent Mount Stewart Junior School HA3 0JX 2020 Trial Brent Northview Junior and Infant School NW10 1RD 2020 Trial Brent Our Lady of Grace RC Infant and Nursery School NW2 6EU 2020 Trial Brent Our Lady of Lourdes RC Primary School NW10 8PP 2020 Trial Brent Preston Manor School HA9 8NA Planned Brent Preston Park Primary School HA9 8RJ 2020 Trial Brent
    [Show full text]