DOCSLIB.ORG

Boran Breed.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boran Breed.Pdf Boran Breed Genus : - Bos Species : - indicus Breed : - Boran Current published text states that origins of all domesticated cattle can be traced back to two main centres, Asian (Bos indicus) and the Near East-European (Bos taurus). Due to recent improved technology in the methods of genetic identification and new archaeological findings, there is now believed to be a third origin, which was a native African taurine, centred in the Saharan Belt of Africa (Bos taurus),. "Genetics studies at the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) have shown that the genetic composition of the Kenyan Boran is unique. If the genetic background of the Kenyan Boran is predominantly zebu, the breed also contains taurine background of two separate origins. A European-Near East taurine background of some antiquity and most likely also from recent crossbreeding and an African indigenous taurine background which is not found in any Asian zebu crosses such as Sahiwal or Brahman" (O.Hanotte. See also M.Okomo et al. 1998, J.E.O Rege et al. 2001). As revealed by O.Hanotte at ILRI, they have shown that the Boran genome contains three distinct genetic influences. Other than the Zebu influence (Bos indicus), there are influences from both the Near East-European Bos Taurus as well as a distinct influence from native African Bos tarus. The predominant influence was however from the Zebu. "The Zebus of the second wave have thoracic humps and started to come into north-east Africa in the 4th century AD, but the major importations date only from the time of the Arab invasions which started in 669 AD." "The Zebu were becoming common in Kenya in the 15th century." Ian Mason, (Factors Influencing the World Distribution of Beef Cattle. F.A.O.1974). From this 'genetic package', came the Borana cattle in Ethiopia, which became the dominant breed type of the region known as the East African Shorthorned Zebu. They are typically the cattle kept by the Borana in Southern Ethiopia and the Somali and Orma tribes of Kenya. From these types came the Boran as adopted by commercial cattlemen in Kenya who developed the breed we see today. The Boran now found in Zambia, Tanzania, Uganda, Australia and USA originated from genetic exports of Kenyan Boran cattle between the 1970's and 1990's. The breed in Zimbabwe and South Africa came from embryos exported from the excellent facility on Ol Pejeta Ranch at Nanyuki, Kenya, during 1994 and 2000. The Boran produces high quality beef, utilizing low quality forage. This is substantiated by data from The FAO/UNDP feedlot trial at Lanet in Kenya, where 7,625 Borans and crossbreds were fed between 1968-1973. Similar evidence comes from 1998 trials in Queensland, Australia. At Lanet, crossbreds between large European breeds and the Boran grew 31% faster on the high concentrate ration (76% concentrate), but had no significant advantage over the pure Boran on the low (33% conc.) and medium (50% conc.) ration. (Kenya Beef Industry Development Project, 1974) Trials in Nebraska, USA, show that the Boran and its crosses score consistently better than other Zebu breeds for meat tenderness, carcase marbling and rib eye area. Butchers in Kenya prefer Borans and their crosses for these reasons. Borans are generally more docile and tractable than other Zebu cattle. Large numbers of Boran bulls kept in one herd cause little trouble. Females are easy to handle, although cows with newborn calves can be naturally aggressive when protecting their offspring. Boran cattle have a very pronounced herd instinct, making them easily managed in bush country and well suited to cow calf operations. They always stay together and defend against predators, thus ensuring high calf survival rates. Two way crossing is the simplest and most effective way of attaining and commercially exploiting hybrid vigour. The all-round genetic package of the Boran cow makes her ideal for producing F1 hybrids. Where pure Borans are available for commercial crossing there remains no purpose in three-way or topcrossing on halfbreds. Height of typical mature bull: - 117-147 cm at withers Height of typical mature cow: - 114-127 cm at withers Typical carcase weight off grass: 230-260 kg dressed weight with 52% dressing percentage Weight of typical mature bull: - 500 kg to 850 kg Weight of typical mature cow: - 380 kg to 450 kg Steers reared on grass: - ready for slaughter between 3 to 3.5 yrs 36 -42 months) 420-460 kg Steers, supplementary fed: - ready for slaughter between 18 to 22months @ 380 to 400 kg On average cows calve once a year: - potentially 11 months (higher than other indicus breeds) Average weight gains per day on grass & feedlot: - Grass = 0.7 kg - 1.0 kg per day depending on grass quality Feedlot = 1.3 kg per day depending on type of cross used (this was found at a recent trial at Marania Farm - Timau where using Boran cross Angus steers & heifers) Milk Production from Boran / Friesian F1: - 1st Lactation : - Av = 9.3 kgs per day High= 13.8 kg per day 2nd Lactation : - Av= 10.4 kg per day High = 15.6kg per day 3rd Lactation : - Av= 13.4 kg per day High = 19.5 kg per day Exports to international countries? Zimbabwe, Zambia, South Africa and Australia Origin / History? Ethiopia over 2000 years old as domestic animal for milk / beef How pure is the stock? Improved by commercial European ranchers - early 1900's to date Typical weight - mature bull? 650 kg to 850 kg Typical weight - mature cow? 380 kg to 450 kg What are the steers reared on? Predominantly grass What age are they ready for slaughter? Between 3 years to 31/2 years Average yield of carcase? 52 % off grass With supplementary feed, how soon are they ready for slaughter? 18 to 22 months @ 380 to 400 kg. Describe the beef? Tender and juicy Suitability for cross breeding with any dairy of beef breed? DAIRY - Friesian cross BEEF - all British & Continental breeds How soon do young cattle develop resistance? From birth Is this a purely beef producing breed? Principally yes, but also has good milk potential Does Boran cow yield adequate milk for its calves? Definitely Mothering abilities? Excellent Are calves guarded by mother? Do they herd together? Yes / Yes What is potential calving interval? 11 months Any calving / birth problems? Hardly any Semen exported to breeders? Yes - Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa and East Africa Feed required, as compared to other breeds? Much less Convert feed into more protein and butterfat per unit of body weight? Yes Dairy producers can realize more profits potential while reducing management costs? Definitely yes Do Boran reach reproductive maturity at an early age? Yes, if conditions are right, can be at 18 months Are Boran registered at birth? By which governing body? Book - birth notification soon after birth & registration? Yes - Kenya Stud Book / before 3 years Thrive under extreme heat? Yes, has many more sweat pores compared to European cattle Prone to tick attack? Short, strong, shiny hair, which discourages tick attacks Walks long distances? Yes, oval shaped conformation + slightly sickle hocks, which enable the Boran to walk long distances without effort .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crossbreeding of Cattle in Africa
    Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences June 2018, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 16-31 ISSN: 2334-2404 (Print), 2334-2412 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jaes.v7n1a3 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/jaes.v7n1a3 Crossbreeding of Cattle in Africa R Trevor Wilson1 Abstract Africa is endowed with a very wide range of mostly Bos indicus indigenous cattle breeds. A general statement with regard to their performance for meat or milk is that they are of inferior genetic value. Attempts to improve their performance have rarely relied on within-breed improvement but have concentrated on crossing to supposedly superior exotic Bos taurus types. Exotic types have not always – indeed have rarely -- been chosen on objective criteria and the imported breeds generally indicate the colonial past of individual African countries rather than on use of “the right animal in the right place”. Most attempts at increasing output have been undertaken under research station conditions. Results on station have been very variable but the limited success achieved has rarely been carried over in to the general African cattle population. This paper documents a number of attempts to alter the genetic make-up of African cattle in several countries and discusses the reasons for the failure of most of these. Keywords: Bos indicus, Bos taurus, livestock experiments, milk production, meat production 1. Introduction African countries differ greatly in climatic, ecological and agricultural conditions and in socioeconomic factors. In many countries, nonetheless, cattle are the most important livestock species.
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Potential of Reproductive Technology to Improved Ruminant Production in Ethiopia
    Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3208 (Paper) ISSN 2225-093X (Online) Vol.10, No.8, 2020 Review on Potential of Reproductive Technology to Improved Ruminant Production in Ethiopia Jalel Fikadu Yadeta Assosa University, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of animal science, Assosa, Ethiopia DOI: 10.7176/JBAH/10-8-02 Publication date: April 30 th 2020 INTRODUCTION Reproductive technology encompasses all current and anticipated uses of technology in human and animal reproduction, including assisted reproductive technology, contraception and others (Mapletoft and Hasler, 2005). Research into physiology and embryology has provided a basis for the development of technologies that increase productivity of farm animals through enhanced control of reproductive function. Animal Biotechnology represents an expanding collection of rapidly developing disciplines in science and information technologies. The livestock provides many opportunities to utilize these disciplines and evolving competencies. Individually, these are powerful tools capable of providing significant improvements in productivity. Combinations of these technologies coupled with information systems and data analysis will provide even more significant changes in the next decade. Various techniques have been developed and refined to obtain a large number of offspring from genetically superior animals or obtain offspring from infertile (or sub fertile) animals (Naqvi et al ., 2001; Blackburn, 2004). Based on the progress in scientific knowledge of endocrinology, reproductive physiology, cell biology and embryology during the last fifty years new bio techniques have been developed for and introduced into animal breeding and husbandry (Wrathall et al., 2004). Among them are estrus synchronization/induction, artificial insemination, Multiple Ovulation Induction and Embryo Transfer (MOET), in vitro embryo production (IVP) and cloning by Nuclear Transfer (NT) all are components of the tool box for present and future applications (Betteridge, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity of Boran Cattle Maintained by Chemoprophylaxis Under Trypanosomiasis Risk
    Productivity of Boran cattle maintained by chemoprophylaxis under trypanosomiasis risk J.C.M. Trail, K. Sones, J.M.C. Jibbo, J. Durkin, D.E. Light and Max Murray February 1985 *j -T- S A ILCA PUBLICATIONS The International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) is an autonomous, non-profit making research and in­ formation centre with a mandate to improve livestock production throughout sub-Saharan Africa. The activi­ ties and publications of the centre are financed by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Re­ search (CGIAR). The CGIAR members which have funded ILCA to date arc the International Develcp­ ment Research Centre, the International Fund for Agricultural Development, the United Nations Devel­ opment Programme, the World Bank, and the govern­ ments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chitia, Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, France, Iran. Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands. Nigeria. Norvay, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Switzerland. the United King­ dom and the United States of America. Responsibility for ILCA publications rests solely with the centre and with such other parties as may be cited as joint authors. Until 1982, the centre's two maiil series of scientific pubiications were Systems Studies and Monographs. These two series have now been superceded by the present series of Research Reports. Productivity of Boran cattle maintained by chemoprophylaxis under trypanosomiasis risk 3 J.C.M. Trail', K. Sones 2 , J.M.C. Jibbo , J. Durkin4 , D.E. Light4 and Max Murray5 . 1 Livestock Productivity and Trypanotolerance Group, ILCA, P.O. Box 46847, Nairobi, K.nya. 2 May and Baker Ltd., Dagenham, Essex, UK. 3 Amboni Ltd., P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the Tuli and Boran Breeds
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CGSpace The multiplication of Africa’s indigenous cattle breeds internationally: the story of the Tuli and Boran breeds Ntombizakhe Mpofu (2002) ZaBelo Livestock Consultancy, P.O. Box 911, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe History of the breeds The Tuli The Tuli breed was developed from cattle indigenous to south-western Zimbabwe and eastern Botswana. In 1942, while working in the Lowveld area south of Gwanda, Zimbabwe, a land development officer, Mr Len Harvey, noticed that there appeared to be a distinct type of yellow Sanga cattle among the mixed native stock. These cattle seemed to be better adapted to local conditions and were superior to other stock. It was decided to purchase some of these cattle from the smallholder farmers and study them to determine if the type could be improved and whether or not they would breed true. In November 1945, 3000 acres were set aside in Guyu near Gwanda for the establishment of the Tuli Breeding Station. The founding herd had twenty cows and one bull. The idea was to breed bulls to assist in improving smallholder stock, but the commercial farmers also showed interest in the breed and started buying bulls from the station. A breed society was formed in 1961. Because of security problems associated with the liberation war, the Tuli herd was moved to Matopos Research Station in 1979. The selection programme is still in progress. The breed is now used in many commercial herds throughout Zimbabwe and there are seven stud breeders in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genome Landscape of Indigenous African Cattle
    Kim et al. Genome Biology (2017) 18:34 DOI 10.1186/s13059-017-1153-y RESEARCH Open Access The genome landscape of indigenous African cattle Jaemin Kim1†, Olivier Hanotte2,3†, Okeyo Ally Mwai4, Tadelle Dessie3, Salim Bashir5, Boubacar Diallo6, Morris Agaba7, Kwondo Kim1,8, Woori Kwak1, Samsun Sung1, Minseok Seo1, Hyeonsoo Jeong9, Taehyung Kwon10, Mengistie Taye10,11, Ki-Duk Song12,18, Dajeong Lim13, Seoae Cho1, Hyun-Jeong Lee8,14, Duhak Yoon15, Sung Jong Oh16, Stephen Kemp4,17, Hak-Kyo Lee12,18*† and Heebal Kim1,10,19*† Abstract Background: The history of African indigenous cattle and their adaptation to environmental and human selection pressure is at the root of their remarkable diversity. Characterization of this diversity is an essential step towards understanding the genomic basis of productivity and adaptation to survival under African farming systems. Results: We analyze patterns of African cattle genetic variation by sequencing 48 genomes from five indigenous populations and comparing them to the genomes of 53 commercial taurine breeds. We find the highest genetic diversity among African zebu and sanga cattle. Our search for genomic regions under selection reveals signatures of selection for environmental adaptive traits. In particular, we identify signatures of selection including genes and/ or pathways controlling anemia and feeding behavior in the trypanotolerant N’Dama, coat color and horn development in Ankole, and heat tolerance and tick resistance across African cattle especially in zebu breeds. Conclusions: Our findings unravel at the genome-wide level, the unique adaptive diversity of African cattle while emphasizing the opportunities for sustainable improvement of livestock productivity on the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity of Boran Cattle Maintained by Chemoprophylaxis Under Trypanosomiasis Risk
    ILCA Research Report No. 9 Productivity of Boran cattle maintained by chemoprophylaxis under trypanosomiasis risk J. CM. Trail, K. Sones, J.M.C. Jibbo, J. Durkin, D.E. Light and Max Murray February 1985 INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK CENTRE FOR AFRICA ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA ILCA PUBLICATIONS The International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) is an autonomous, non-profit making research and in formation centre with a mandate to improve livestock production throughout sub-Saharan Africa. The activi ties and publications of the centre are financed by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Re search (CGIAR). The CGIAR members which have funded ILCA to date are the International Develop ment Research Centre, the International Fund for Agricultural Development, the United Nations Devel opment Programme, the World Bank, and the govern ments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, France, Iran, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Switzerland, the United King dom and the United States of America. Responsibility for ILCA publications rests solely with the centre and with such other parties as may be cited as joint authors. Until 1982, the centre's two main series of scientific publications were Systems Studies and Monographs. These two series have now been superceded by the present series of Research Reports. "This Or III II I III II III RHQS-AUA-623J Productivity of Boran cattle maintained by chemoprophylaxis under trypanosomiasis risk J.C.M. Trail1, K. Sones2, J.M.C. Jibbo3, J. Durkin4, D.E. Light4 and Max Murray5. 1 Livestock Productivity and Trypanotolerance Group, ILCA, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeds of Beef and Multi-Purpose Cattle
    BREEDS OF BEEF AND MULTI-PURPOSE CATTLE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The inspiration for writing this book goes back to my undergraduate student days at Iowa State University when I enrolled in the course, “Breeds of Livestock,” taught by the late Dr. Roy Kottman, who was then the Associate Dean of Agriculture for Undergraduate Instruction. I was also inspired by my livestock judging team coach, Professor James Kiser, who took us to many great livestock breeders’ farms for practice judging workouts. I also wish to acknowledge the late Dr. Ronald H. Nelson, former Chairman of the Department of Animal Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Nelson offered me an Instructorship position in 1957 to pursue an advanced degree as well as teach a number of undergraduate courses, including “Breeds of Livestock.” I enjoyed my work so much that I never left, and remained at Michigan State for my entire 47-year career in Animal Science. During this career, I had an opportunity to judge shows involving a significant number of the breeds of cattle reviewed in this book. I wish to acknowledge the various associations who invited me to judge their shows and become acquainted with their breeders. Furthermore, I want to express thanks to my spouse, Dr. Leah Cox Ritchie, for her patience while working on this book, and to Ms. Nancy Perkins for her expertise in typing the original manuscript. I also want to acknowledge the late Dr. Hilton Briggs, the author of the textbook, “Modern Breeds of Livestock.” I admired him greatly and was honored to become his close friend in the later years of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Signatures of Adaptive Introgression and Environmental
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Edinburgh Research Explorer Edinburgh Research Explorer Genomic signatures of adaptive introgression and environmental adaptation in the Sheko cattle of southwest Ethiopia Citation for published version: Bahbahani, H, Afana, A & Wragg, D 2018, 'Genomic signatures of adaptive introgression and environmental adaptation in the Sheko cattle of southwest Ethiopia', PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 8, e0202479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202479 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1371/journal.pone.0202479 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: PLoS ONE Publisher Rights Statement: Copyright: © 2018 Bahbahani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Zebu Cattle of Kenya: Uses, Performance, Farmer Preferences and Measures of Genetic Diversity
    5', J Zebu cattle of Kenya: Uses, performance, farmer preferences and measures of genetic diversity ILRI International Livestock Research Institute INTERNATIONAL L/VE5TOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE tOTijr Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Zebu cattle of Kenya: Uses, performance, farmer preferences, measures of genetic diversity and options for improved use Animal Genetic Resources Research 1 J.E.O. Rege, A. Kahi, M. Okomo-Adhiambo, J. Mwacharo and O. Hanotte ILRI International Livestock Research Institute INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEAXCH INSTITUTE Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Thl s One I I II II HS6H-2WA-EXK7 Authors' affiliations J.E.O. Rege, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), RO. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia A. Kahi, Department of Animal Science, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536, Njoro, Kenya M. OkomoAdhiambo, ILRI, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya J. Mwacharo, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, KARI, Kiboko Research Centre, P.O. Box 5781 1, Makindu, Kenya O. Hanotte, ILRI, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya © 2001 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) All rights reserved. Parts of this docment may be reproduced without express permission for non-commercial use but with acknowledgment to ILRI. Cover photo courtesy of Clemens Wollny. ISBN 92-9146-094-X Correct citation: Rege J.E.O., Kahi A.K., OkomoAdhiambo M., Mwacharo J. and Hanotte O. 2001. Zebu cattle of Kenya: Uses, performance, farmer preferences, measures of genetic diversity and options for improved use. Animal Genetic Resources Research 1. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. 103 pp. Table of Contents List of Tables v List of Figures vii Acknowledgements viii Foreword ix 1 Introduction 1 2 Background on African cattle 3 2.1 Origin and current classification of African cattle 3 2.2 Zebu cattle breeds of eastern Africa 4 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
    c o l o n - %f\SVERIGES l®if LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET Genetic Analysis of Boran, Friesian and Crossbred Cattle in Ethiopia Mekonnen Haile-Mariam Dissertation Uppsala 1994 o o i o ' i g 3\ SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET Genetic Analysis of Boran, Friesian and Crossbred Cattle in Ethiopia Mekonnen Haile-Mariam Institutionen for husdjursfdradling Rapport 113 och sjukdomsgenetik Publication No. 113 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 1994 Department of Animal Breeding ISSN 0347-9706 and Genetics isrn SLU-HFS-R--113-SE Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences De sartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics Box 7023 S-7a50 07 UPPSALA ISI N 91-576-4893-X Printed at SLU Info/Repro, Uppsala 1994 ABSTRACT This thesis, comprising six papers based on Ethiopian data, deals with the evaluation of Boran cattle and their crosses regarding reproductive, survival, and growth traits, and of dairy cattle of Friesian origin and their crosses with Boran regarding lactation milk yield, lactation length, calving interval (Cl) and abortion rate. In addition, estimates of genetic parameters and genetic and environmental trends for growth, milk yield and reproductive traits are included. The results from the analysis of data collected between 1977 and 1985 from the Abemossa Cattle breeding and improvement ranch of the Ministry of Agriculture were: the weight of Boran, F1 and 3/4 Friesian calves were similar at birth but at weaning the F7 and 3/4 Friesian calves were heavier than the Boran by 19 and 22 kg, respectively. The significance of the interaction effect between breed and season of birth showed that Boran calves maintained uniform growth rate regardless of their birth season, while the highest fluctuation in weaning weight was observed in the 3/4 crossbred calves.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Strategy to Improve Ethiopian Boran Cattle for Meat and Milk Production
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CGSpace www.ipms-ethiopia.org www.eap.gov.et Working Paper No. 26 Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran cattle for meat and milk production Canadian International Agence canadienne de Development Agency développement international Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran cattle for meat and milk production Aynalem Haile, Workneh Ayalew, Noah Kebede, Tadelle Dessie and Azage Tegegne* Improving Productivity and Market Success of Ethiopian Farmers project (IPMS)– International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia *Azage Tegegne is corresponding author: [email protected] Authors’ affiliations Aynalem Haile, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Workneh Ayalew, National Agricultural Research Institute (NARI), Papua New Guinea Tadelle Dessie, ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Noah Kebede, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Azage Tegegne, IPMS, ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia © 2011 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view this license, visit http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. Unless otherwise noted, you are free to copy, duplicate, or reproduce, and distribute, display, or transmit any part of this publication or portions thereof without permission, and to make translations, adaptations, or other derivative works under the following conditions: ATTRIBUTION. The work must be attributed, but not in any way that suggests endorsement by ILRI or the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Somaliland Somalia
    THE LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AI ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION AnGR ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES AU AFRICAN UNION AU-IBAR INTERNATIONAL BUREAU OF ANIMAL RESOURCES CU CONSERVATION & UTILIZATION EU EUROPEAN UNION FAO FOOD AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION GDP GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCTION MOL MINISTRY OF LIVESTOCK MOA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE PACE PAN-AFRICAN CONTROL OF EPIZOOTICS SLPF SOMALI LIVESTOCK PROFESSIONAL FORUM ii SUMMARY The livestock sector is the backbone of the Somali economy since it produces: Employment oppertunities 60%, Foreign currency earnings 80% and Gross Domestic Products 40%. However, the decay of key private and public sector institutions following the collapse of the military regime in 1991 resulted in the poor delivery of animal health services to support somali livestock production and trade. Suspicions of the presence of major epizootic diseases of livestock led to the imposition of livestocl bans by major importing countries. There is therefore need for rihabilitation and strengthening of institutions to improve delivery and regulation of animal genetic resources and health services in order toadhere the international standards for trade in livestock and livestock products. In somali at present, only pastoralists and agro-pastoralists are practicing the selection of breeds in their flocks or herds. In every two or three years, the owners or producers make slection of best males prefering to their mothers or grand mothers the production, physical appearans and rasistance for disease and draughts to obtain the best quality breeds. Sheep reproduce offspring once a year because the owner controls the mating period to adjust the rainy season and time of delivery. So in terms of inventory, characterization, labialization and conservation of Animal Genetic iii Resources are remaining in the hands of Nomads and agro-pastoralists because they are the sole institutions responsible for keeping the animals.
    [Show full text]