WHY IS THERE NO SOCIALISM in the UNITED STATES? Why Is There No Socialism in the United States?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WHY IS THERE NO SOCIALISM in the UNITED STATES? Why Is There No Socialism in the United States? WHY IS THERE NO SOCIALISM IN THE UNITED STATES? Why is there no Socialism in the United States? WERNER SOMBART Translated by Patricia M. Hocking Head of German, Lockleaze Comprehensive School, Bristol and C. T. Husbands Lecturer in Sociology, University of Bristol Edited and with an Introductory Essay by C. T. Husbands and with a Foreword by Michael Harrington This work was originally published inin 19061906 by thethe Verlag vonvon J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) of Tiibingen under the title Warum gibt es in den Vereinigten Staaten keinen Sozialismus? It was slightly revised from a series of articles that had appeared in the Archiv filr So%ialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik [Works in Social Science and Social Policy], XXI (1905) ISBN 978-1-349-02526-8 ISBN 978-1-349-02524-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-02524-4 English translation © Patricia M. Hocking and C. T. Husbands 1976 Editor's introductory essay and editorial material © C. T. Husbands 1976 Michael Harrington's foreword © The Macmillan Press Ltd 1976 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1976 978-0-333-18008-2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission First published I976 by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD London and Basingstoke Associated companies in New York Dublin Melbourne Johannesburg and Madras SBN 333 18008 9 This book is sold subject to the standard conditions of the Net Book Agreement Contents Preface to the Original German Edition vii Foreword by Michael Harrington 1X List of Tables xiii Editor's Introductory Essay XV Translators' and Editor's Notes and Acknowledgements xxxix INTRODUafiON I Capitalism in the United States 3 2 Socialism in the United States I5 SECTION ONE The Political Position of the Worker I Politics and Race 27 2 The Political Machine 29 3 The Monopoly of the Two Major Parties 33 4 The Failures of All Third Parties 4I 5 The Inner Nature of the Ruling Parties 45 6 The Position of the American Worker in the State 55 SECTION TWO The Economic Situation of the Worker I A General View 6I 2 The Money-income of the Worker in America and Europe 63 3 The Cost of Living in America and Germany 75 4 How the Worker Lives 93 5 Standard of Living and Ideology I05 vi Contents SECTION THREE The Social Position of the Worker I The Democratic Style of Public Life in America 109 2 Employer and Worker I I I 3 The Worker's Escape into Freedom 115 Abbreviations of Journal Titles I20 Notes I2I Bibliography I68 Index I8J Preface to the Original German Edition The studies of the workers' movement and of Socialism in the United States of America published in this book first appeared in more or less identical form in Volume XXI of the Archiv fur Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolvtik. 1 I have departed from the original text only by intro­ ducing some new numerical data and a small amount of additional illustrative material. I decided upon a special edition of the work only after I had become certain that the principal points of my argument were correct. The verdict of American experts on the subject assured me of this, and not only have my middle-class American friends told me that they agree with me, but the leaders of the Socialist parties have also recognised the correctness of my interpretation - something that seems to me to be even more conclusive. The International Socialist Review, the official scholarly journal of the Socialist Party, has even reproduced my articles for its readers, mostly in the full text. 2 This study can serve as a supplement to the chapters of my book, Sozialismus und soziale Bewegung, where I have already attempted (in the last edition) to present a concise sketch of Socialism in the U.S.A.' w.s. Breslau, 14 August xgo6"' Foreword MICHAEL l!ARRINGTON The questions raised by Werner Sombart in 1go6 about the absence of Socialism in the United States are relevant to American politics in the 1970s. A number of factors and events are converging and it is clear that this decade will be a period of political realignment or political dis­ integration.1 The energy crisis, the great recession·inflation of the seventies, a growing sense of ethical and spiritual malaise, and many other trends all point to such a development. It can be argued, I think, that the nation is at one of those turning points which then fix the outlines of an entire era to come. In the past, there were the rise of Jacksonian Democracy in the 182os, the Civil War and the triumph of Northern capitalism, the emergence of the corporate and imperial structure under the direction of the Republican Party in the I 8gos, Roosevelt's welfare-state politics of the thirties. Now it seems that another moment of change is on the agenda. In Europe, Socialism became a mass movement during the transition from laissez-faire to organised, imperial capitalism (that is to say, between the 18gos and the First World War), although England, as the Editor points out in the introductory essay, is something of a special case. In America, the Socialists failed. The ongoing relevance of the fact in the seventies- and of Sombart's attempt to account for it- is that its explanation requires one to understand social forces and structures which are at work to this very moment and which will profoundly influence the realignments of the seventies and eighties. Thus, Why is there no Socialism in the United States? is not a scholarly curiosity, but a book which poses the issue of American 'exceptionalism', an issue which is quite pertinent in the present crisis. I will not for a moment attempt to survey the literature on the subject. That is well done in the introductory essay (even though, as will be seen in a moment, I have my interpretive differences with it). Rather, I will concentrate on a few of the themes raised by Sombart, and stressed by the Editor, which are important to the present and future as well as to the American past. First of all, I think that the notion of the 'civic integration' of the American working class is extremely important. Sombart treats it, of X Foreword course; but I would place even more of a stress upon it than he does. The continental-European Socialist movement, it must be remembered, began around a civil-rights, rather than an economic, question: the exclusion, or systematic undercounting, of the workers in the political process. In almost every instance, the psychological, emotional basis of the anti-bourgeois struggle was the demand for bourgeois equality. Even in the case of the partial exception in England, there is a striking fact that the first politically organised workers' movement, Chartism, had the same characteristic, even though it did not lay the ground­ work for a mass Socialist party. In the United States there was universal manhood suffrage almost from the very beginning. This led to the phenomenon, first brilliantly formulated by Leon Samson, of 'Americanism' as a substitute for Socialism.2 American capitalism, Samson argued, is the Socialist form of capitalism, i.e., it preaches an egalitarianism, a denial of the reality of class society, which is unlike anything one would have found in France or Britain. Therefore a worker in America could express his drive for equality in terms of, not in counterposition to, the prevailing ideology. The ongoing impact of this ideological factor can be seen in one of the anomalies of the seventies: that the most regressive tax in America is also the most popular. The Social Security levy does not allow for deductions or take into account family size, and it is an outrageous bargain for the rich, who get publicly subsidised retirement insurance on cheaper terms than anyone else. But Social Security retains the myth of being an insurance programme, i.e., of providing the recipient with benefits which he or she has already paid in. In fact, there is a large element of welfare in Social Security but that fact is known only to statisticians and experts. The public, with its Americanist, indi­ vidualist, self-help ideology, is relatively enthusiastic about this highly regressive tax. Secondly, the Editor points out the complexity of the 'roast beef and apple pie' theory of the failure of American Socialism. The evidence, incredible as it may seem, is still in dispute. Seymour Martin Lipset has pointed out that social mobility in America was not that different from Europe, but there are many, many complicating factors. Stephan Themstrom has done some ingenious research in trying to deal with the quantitative question, and a lively summary of the state of the debate can be found in Failure of a Dream?, a volume edited by Lipset with John H. M. Laslett.8 But what concerns me here is not the issue of the numbers but how one interprets them. There is an easy assumption, as the Editor points out in his introduc­ tory essay, which underlies much embourgeoisement analysis: that higher living standards are anti-radical. In fact, the period of the greatest growth of the German Social Democracy, from the abolition Foreword xi of the anti-Socialist laws to the First World War, was a time of relative prosperity for the working class. Moreover, as Adolph Sturmthal has pointed out, many of the statistical comparisons of the American and European living standards in this period omit the value of the Bis­ marckian (or, in England, Lloyd George) social programmes.' So one cannot assume that poverty is radical and affluence conservative, since the reverse is often true.
Recommended publications
  • Political Ideas and Movements That Created the Modern World
    harri+b.cov 27/5/03 4:15 pm Page 1 UNDERSTANDINGPOLITICS Understanding RITTEN with the A2 component of the GCE WGovernment and Politics A level in mind, this book is a comprehensive introduction to the political ideas and movements that created the modern world. Underpinned by the work of major thinkers such as Hobbes, Locke, Marx, Mill, Weber and others, the first half of the book looks at core political concepts including the British and European political issues state and sovereignty, the nation, democracy, representation and legitimacy, freedom, equality and rights, obligation and citizenship. The role of ideology in modern politics and society is also discussed. The second half of the book addresses established ideologies such as Conservatism, Liberalism, Socialism, Marxism and Nationalism, before moving on to more recent movements such as Environmentalism and Ecologism, Fascism, and Feminism. The subject is covered in a clear, accessible style, including Understanding a number of student-friendly features, such as chapter summaries, key points to consider, definitions and tips for further sources of information. There is a definite need for a text of this kind. It will be invaluable for students of Government and Politics on introductory courses, whether they be A level candidates or undergraduates. political ideas KEVIN HARRISON IS A LECTURER IN POLITICS AND HISTORY AT MANCHESTER COLLEGE OF ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY. HE IS ALSO AN ASSOCIATE McNAUGHTON LECTURER IN SOCIAL SCIENCES WITH THE OPEN UNIVERSITY. HE HAS WRITTEN ARTICLES ON POLITICS AND HISTORY AND IS JOINT AUTHOR, WITH TONY BOYD, OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION: EVOLUTION OR REVOLUTION? and TONY BOYD WAS FORMERLY HEAD OF GENERAL STUDIES AT XAVERIAN VI FORM COLLEGE, MANCHESTER, WHERE HE TAUGHT POLITICS AND HISTORY.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous and Social Movement Political Parties in Ecuador and Bolivia, 1978-2000
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Democratizing Formal Politics: Indigenous and Social Movement Political Parties in Ecuador and Bolivia, 1978-2000 A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Jennifer Noelle Collins Committee in charge: Professor Paul Drake, Chair Professor Ann Craig Professor Arend Lijphart Professor Carlos Waisman Professor Leon Zamosc 2006 Copyright Jennifer Noelle Collins, 2006 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Jennifer Noelle Collins is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2006 iii DEDICATION For my parents, John and Sheila Collins, who in innumerable ways made possible this journey. For my husband, Juan Giménez, who met and accompanied me along the way. And for my daughter, Fiona Maité Giménez-Collins, the beautiful gift bequeathed to us by the adventure that has been this dissertation. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE.……………………..…………………………………...…...…iii DEDICATION .............................................................................................................iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • American Civil Associations and the Growth of American Government: an Appraisal of Alexis De Tocqueville’S Democracy in America (1835-1840) Applied to Franklin D
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2017 American Civil Associations and the Growth of American Government: An Appraisal of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835-1840) Applied to Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal and the Post-World War II Welfare State John P. Varacalli The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1828 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] AMERICAN CIVIL ASSOCIATIONS AND THE GROWTH OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT: AN APPRAISAL OF ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE’S DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA (1835- 1840) APPLIED TO FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT’S NEW DEAL AND THE POST-WORLD WAR II WELFARE STATE by JOHN P. VARACALLI A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Program in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2017 © 2017 JOHN P. VARACALLI All Rights Reserved ii American Civil Associations and the Growth of American Government: An Appraisal of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835-1840) Applied to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal and the Post World War II Welfare State by John P. Varacalli The manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts ______________________ __________________________________________ Date David Gordon Thesis Advisor ______________________ __________________________________________ Date Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Acting Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT American Civil Associations and the Growth of American Government: An Appraisal of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835-1840) Applied to Franklin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Werner Sombart's ʻovercomingʼ of Marxism
    CHAPTER 27 Werner Sombart’s ʻOvercomingʼ of Marxism 27.1 The Historical School as ʻDigestive Scienceʼ (Rosa Luxemburg) The ʻolder historical schoolʼ of political economy, whose members included Wilhelm Roscher (1817–94), Bruno Hildebrandt (1812–78) and Karl Knies (1821– 98), emerged in the 1840s. It was a specifically ʻGermanʼ reaction both to the French Revolution and to the ʻWesternʼ cosmopolitanism of classical political economy from Smith to Ricardo.1 It was ostensibly concerned with opposing the ʻsurgical extractionʼ of the economy from the ʻliving bodyʼ of popular life and the life of the state, and in particular the ʻnarrow egotistic psychologyʼ according to which social actors are guided, in their economic behaviour, only by economic considerations, as opposed to ethical motives.2 If Machiavelli banished ethics from politics, Adam Smith performed the same operation for political economy, criticises Knies, who emphasises the significance of the ʻethico-political momentʼ for political economy and speaks of the discipline being ʻelevatedʼ to the status of a ʻmoral and political science’.3 At first glance, this seems to represent an integral approach to studying social practices. But behind this pathos of wholeness, there lies the definition of political economy as a ʻstate economyʼ concerned with ʻjudging men and ruling them’.4 The historical school developed from cameralism, which became the discipline of state science due to the Prussian path of capitalist develop- ment.5 Marx describes cameralism as ʻa medley of smatterings, through
    [Show full text]
  • Between L.S. Lowry and Coronation Street: Salford Cultural Identities
    Between L.S. Lowry and Coronation Street: Salford Cultural Identities Susanne Schmid Abstract: Salford, “the classic slum”, according to Robert Roberts’s study, has had a distinct cultural identity of its own, which is centred on the communal ideal of work- ing-class solidarity, best exemplified in the geographical space of “our street”. In the wake of de-industrialisation, Roberts’s study, lyrics by Ewan MacColl, L.S. Lowry’s paintings, and the soap opera Coronation Street all nostalgically celebrate imagined northern working-class communities, imbued with solidarity and human warmth. Thereby they contribute to constructing both English and northern identities. Key names and concepts: Friedrich Engels - Robert Roberts - Ewan MacColl - L.S. Lowry - Charles Dickens - Richard Hoggart - George Orwell; Slums - Escaper Fiction - Working-class Culture - Nostalgia - De-industrialisation - Rambling - Coronation Street. 1. Salford as an Imagined Northern Community For a long time, Salford, situated right next to the heart of Manchester, has been known as a place that underwent rapid and painful industri- alisation in the nineteenth century and an equally difficult and agonis- ing process of de-industrialisation in the twentieth. If Manchester, the former flag-ship of the cotton industry, has been renowned for its beautiful industrial architecture, its museums, and its economic suc- cess, Salford has been hailed as “the classic slum”, as in the title of Robert Roberts’s seminal study about Salford slum life in the first quarter of the twentieth century (Roberts 1990, first published in 1971). The equation of “Salford” and “slum”, however, dates back further than that. Friedrich Engels’s The Condition of the Working Class in England, written in 1844/45, casts a gloomy light on a city made up of dwellings hardly fit for humans: 348 Susanne Schmid If we cross the Irwell to Salford, we find on a peninsula formed by the river, a town of eighty thousand inhabitants […].
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Consensus, Political Conflict: the Problem of Unity Among German Intellectuals During World War I
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2006 Cultural Consensus, Political Conflict: The Problem of Unity among German Intellectuals during World War I Benjamin Taylor Shannon University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Shannon, Benjamin Taylor, "Cultural Consensus, Political Conflict: The Problem of Unity among German Intellectuals during World War I. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4498 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Benjamin Taylor Shannon entitled "Cultural Consensus, Political Conflict: The Problem of Unity among German Intellectuals during World War I." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History. Vejas Liulevicius, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: A. Denise Phillips, John Bohstedt Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Benjamin Taylor Shannon entitled "Cultural Consensus, Political Conflict: The Problem of Unity among German Intellectuals during World War I." I have examined the finalpaper copy of this thesis for formand content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Movement Studies Framing Faith
    This article was downloaded by: [Florida State University Libraries] On: 25 January 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 789349894] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Social Movement Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713446651 Framing Faith: Explaining Cooperation and Conflict in the US Conservative Christian Political Movement Deana A. Rohlinger a; Jill Quadagno a a Department of Sociology, Florida State University, Florida, USA To cite this Article Rohlinger, Deana A. and Quadagno, Jill(2009) 'Framing Faith: Explaining Cooperation and Conflict in the US Conservative Christian Political Movement', Social Movement Studies, 8: 4, 341 — 358 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/14742830903234239 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14742830903234239 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Ideology Chapter 9: Political Ideology|183
    CHAPTER 9: Political Ideology Chapter 9: Political Ideology|183 "Aconservativeisaman withtwoperfectlygood legswho,however,has neverlearnedhowto walkforward." FranklinDelano Roosevelt, 32ndPresidentofthe UnitedStates “Thetroublewithour liberalfriendsisnotthat theyareignorant,but thattheyknowsomuch thatisn'tso.” 9.0 | What’s in a Name? RonaldReagan, 40thPresidentofthe Have you ever been in a discussion, debate, or perhaps even a heated UnitedStates argument about government or politics where one person objected to another person’s claim by saying, “That’s not what I mean by conservative (or liberal)? If so, then join the club. People often have to stop in the middle of a good political discussion when it becomes clear that the participants do not agree on the meanings of the terms that are central to the discussion. This can be the case with ideology because people often use familiar terms such as conservative, liberal, or socialist without agreeing on their meanings. This chapter has three main goals. The first goal is to explain the role ideology plays in modern political systems. The second goal is to define the major American ideologies: conservatism, liberalism, and libertarianism. The primary focus is on modern conservatism and liberalism. The third goal is to explain their role in government and politics. Some attention is also paid to other “isms”—belief systems that have some of the attributes of an ideology—that are relevant to modern American politics such as environmentalism, feminism, terrorism, and fundamentalism. The chapter begins with an examination of ideologies in general. It then examines American conservatism, liberalism, and other belief systems relevant to modern American politics and government. 9.1 | What is an ideology? An ideology is a belief system that consists of a relatively coherent set of ideas, attitudes, or values about government and politics, AND the public policies that are designed to implement the values or achieve the goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology in Sombart's Sociology
    Technology in Sombart’s sociology Gennaro Iorio Abstract This paper outlines Sombart’s thought in respect to technology. After describing the cultural context, the paper presents Chapter XXIX, entitled “The Spirit of Technology”, of his most important work Modern Capitalism (Sombart 1902/1972), but mostly we will look at an in-depth study done on the essay “Technology and Culture” of 1911, which Sombart presented to the German Sociology Society at its first congress. The conclusions will emphasize how useful a reflection on technology can be, so as to propose once again original excerpts drawn from the thought of a great nineteenth-century European intellectual. Keywords : Technology, Modernity, Capitalism, Culture, Sombart 1. Introduction This essay delineates Sombart’s thought in regard to technology. After having defined the cultural context within which scientific production regarding the topic on technology is assembled, the essay presents Sombart’s thought, utilizing chapter XXIX entitled: “The Spirit of Technology”, of his most important work Modern Capitalism (Sombart 1902/1972). Moreover we shall be going more in depth on the essay “Technology and Culture” of 1911, which Sombart presented at the first congress of the German Sociological Society. In concluding, we will show how useful a reflection on technology can be, by re-proposing unedited excerpts from the thought of a great nineteenth-century German intellectual. 2. Technology and Modernity: the context of the debate in Sombart’s time One of the arguments around which German intellectual reflection is organized, between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, concerns the character of technology, which increasingly takes on the form of domination regarding the nature and the life of man.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Liberalism and Realism: A
    International Journal of Business and Management Review Vol.1, No.4, pp.15-25, December 2013 Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.ea-journals.org) LIBERALISM AND REALISM: A MATRIX FOR POLITICAL ECONOMY IKE NNIA MBA SR, PHD Department of Management, University Of Nigeria, Enugu Campus EZE UKAMAKA TERESA Inspector of Education, Ministry Of Education, Enugu State ABSTRACT: Politics and economics share an intimate relationship. To separate either in analysis is unfair, as it dismisses the interdependency between both schools of thought. Thus, in issues pertaining to the Political Economy, there is a fusion between politics and economics to obtain the most thorough and holistic understanding of both spheres. Political economy is concerned with the allocation of scarce resources in a world of infinite wants and needs. In order to allocate these resources, politics are used within a state to provide for the people. Of the different analytic frameworks there are two dominant perspectives: Liberalism and Realism. Liberalism can be attributed to a political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual and their economic activities to be paramount in nation-states, while Realism is based on certain assumptions or premises that nation-states are the dominant actors within the political economy and the proper units of analysis. Other units of analysis are subordinated to the nation-state and therefore superfluous to integrate into evaluation. This paper is directed towards liberalism and realism paradigm; a matrix very useful in comprehending the behavior of the nation-state and in describing, explaining, and predicting political economy.
    [Show full text]
  • National Socialism
    National Socialism (Nazism; NS), German political movement led by Adolf Hitler. The notion of combining the concepts of "national" and "social" became popular in Germany before World War I. In 1919 an antisemitic right-wing political party called the German Workers' Party (Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) was founded in Munich; this party adopted the combined "national-social" ideology. In 1920 the party added "National Socialist" to its name and thus became the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP or Nazi Party). A year later Adolf Hitler, a man who started out as a public speaker for the party, became its undisputed leader, or Fuehrer. The National Socialist ideology was an outgrowth of earlier political theories that also gave birth to fascism--- a political movement that became popular in Italy some years before the Nazis took over Germany. Nazism brought together the ideas of racial anti-semitism (that Jews were inferior by virtue of their race, or genetic makeup), Social Darwinism (that certain individuals or ethnic groups are dominant because of their inherent genetic superiority), and lebensraum (the belief that Germans needed more "living space," i.e. more territory, particularly in Eastern Europe). Nazism also embraced the attitude of total anti-Bolshevism, and demanded revenge against those people--- especially Jews---who, they claimed, had "betrayed" Germany during World War I and caused it to be vanquished by the enemy (see also stab in the back myth). During its first three years of existence, the Nazi Party was mainly active in Bavaria. However, its members used emotional appeals and violence to attract many new members.
    [Show full text]
  • My Ways and My Days
    ROBERT ROBERTS BORN 1839 —DIED 1898 AUTOBIOGRAPHY with an APPENDIX by ( C C. WALKER Former Editor of "The Christadelphian" 0 n "** . I ROBERT ROBERTS (From a photograph taken in 189S) Printed and bound in Great Britain by R. J. Acford, Chichester, Sussex. J D PREFACE D HE first thirty-six chapters of this book consist T of an autobiography, under the heading of "My Days and My Ways," that originally appeared in a little monthly magazine called Good Company (1890-1894). The volumes of this have long been out of print. The remaining seven chapters of the book consist of An Appendix concerning " His Days and His Ways," from 1871 to 1898, when he died. This part of the story is of necessity told very briefly, and with some scruples concerning a few left in the land of the living The writer hopes he may be pardoned if anything is thought to be amiss. He aims only at a truthful record, without " malice aforethought " to any living soul. The portrait is from an excellent photograph taken at Malvern in 1895. Q- CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I.—BIRTH AND BOYHOOD .. .. .. 1 II.—" CONVERSION "—Elpis Israel .. .. 7 III.—BAPTISM .. .. .. .. 12 IV.—WRITES TO DR. THOMAS .. .. .. 17 V.—BECOMES A REPORTER .. .. .. 21 VI.—HUDDERSFIELD AND HALIFAX , . 28 VII.—WORKING WITH DR. THOMAS .. .. 34 VIII.—DEWSBURY .. .. .. ..43 IX.—MARRIAGE .. .. .. .. 45 X.—DIETETICS ! .. .. .. .. 53 XI.—INTRODUCING THE TRUTH (HUDDERSFIELD) .. 59 XII.—PUBLIC EFFORT AT HUDDERSFIELD .. 64 XIII.—A BRUSH WITH ATHFISM .. .. 69 XIV.—LEEDS : FOWLER AND WELLS .. .. 74 XV.—BIRMINGHAM : THE FOWLER AND WELLS COMPANY .. .. .. .. 80 XVI.—BIRMINGHAM, LEICESTER, NOTTINGHAM, DERBY .
    [Show full text]