A Service-Oriented Integration Platform for Flexible Information Provisioning in the Real-Time Factory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Service-Oriented Integration Platform for Flexible Information Provisioning in the Real-Time Factory A Service-oriented Integration Platform for Flexible Information Provisioning in the Real-time Factory Von der Graduiertenschule GSaME Graduate School of Excellence advanced Manufacturing Engineering der Universität Stuttgart zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigte Abhandlung Vorgelegt von Jorge Mínguez aus Madrid (Spanien) Hauptberichter: Prof. Dr. Bernhard Mitschang Mitberichter: Prof. Dr. Engelbert Westkämper Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 15. März 2012 Institut für Parallele und Verteilte Systeme (IPVS), Abteilung Anwendersoftware 2012 3 Acknowledgement First of all, I would like to express my most sincere thankful thoughts to my doctoral supervisor and mentor Prof. Mitschang at the Institute for Parallel and Distributed Systems for giving me the opportunity to do my research in his group. I am specially thankful for his continuous sup- port and extraordinary dedication during the last four years of my career. Thanks to his valuable advice and experience, I have been able to success- fully conduct my scientific research and to grow as a researcher and asa person. I also want to thank Prof. Westkämper for creating an outstanding aca- demic environment for doctoral researchers in engineering, computer sci- ence, management and economics. Through his vision and dedication, theGraduateSchoolofExcellenceadvanced Manufacturing Engineering (GSaME) was born in 2007, where I, as well as over 60 other engineers and scientists, have had a unique opportunity to do a doctor’s degree up to now. I would also like to thank him for acting as an active member in the Thesis Committee that supervised my work. I do not want to forget all the staff of the Institute for Industrial Manufacturing and Management at the University of Stuttgart that have made GSaME possible how it is 4 Acknowledgement today. Thank you Vera Hummel, Lars Aldinger, Andreas Dietrich, Heiko Herrmann, Petra Langbein and Eva-Marie Ill. Specially, I would like to sincerely thank Prof. Rohr for her uninterrupted dedication to the suc- cess of GSaME. I would like to thank some of my current and former collegues for many interesting discussions and for their valuable comments and suggestions. I would specially like to thank Mihály Jakob and Thorsten Scheibler for their effort in the supervision of this Thesis, Peter Reimann forhis tremendous dedication in the correction of my written English, Fabian Kaiser, Tobias Kraft, Nazario Cipriani and Oliver Schiller for all the fun in the coffee breaks, Sylvia Radeschútz, Marko Vhrovnik and Manfred Rasch for the wonderful tabletop soccergames.Iwouldalsoliketothank Stefan Silcher for his cooperation and his effort to always improve the quality of our research. I also want to express my gratitude to Frank Ruthardt and Alexander Braunstein for their dedication and contribution to the results of this Thesis. During my time at GSaME, I have also met extremely smart colleagues and I have made great and wonderful friendships. I would like to thank David Baureis, Markus Hartkopf, Donald Neumann, David Schindhelm for all the fun in our nights out, I will always remember the fun at the Stuttgart Beer Festivals. Thanks to Sema Zor, Michelangelo Masini and Michael Wörner for their support and for all the good moments we lived together at conferences and in the University. Also thanks to Miriam Floristán for the support and good times that we shared in Spanish in the multiple lunch times and coffee breaks. Finally, I would like to thank the closest persons that made it all worth it. First, an honest, sincere and deep Thank you goes to my parents Olga and Serafín, who have unconditionally supported me along the path during school, university, abroad and during my doctoral thesis. Last, but not least, I would like to thank Lena for her support and love. I would like to 5 thank her sincerely for her encouragement and patience in the long hours of work in the weekends and at night. Thank you Lena, without you, I would not be where I stand today. 6 Acknowledgement 7 Contents 1Introduction 31 1.1ProblemDomainandMotivation............. 33 1.1.1 TheReal-TimeFactory.............. 34 1.1.2 Life Cycle Management of ICT Factory Resources 35 1.2Vision,ObjectivesandResearchIssues.......... 36 1.2.1 Vision....................... 37 1.2.2 Objectives..................... 38 1.2.3 ResearchIssues.................. 40 1.3StructureoftheThesis................... 44 2 Foundations and Related Work 47 2.1EnterpriseApplicationIntegration............ 47 2.1.1 TypesofIntegration................ 48 2.1.2 EAIMiddleware.................. 48 2.1.2.1 Synchronous versus Asynchronous . 49 2.1.2.2 Publish-Subscribe............ 49 2.1.2.3 Message Brokers . 49 2.1.2.4 RepositoryServices........... 50 2.2ServiceOrientedArchitecture............... 50 8 Contents 2.2.1 TheSOAPrinciples................ 50 2.2.1.1 Reusability............... 51 2.2.1.2 LooseCoupling............. 51 2.2.1.3 Discoverability............. 52 2.2.2 Find,Bind,Invoke................. 52 2.2.3 WebServices................... 53 2.2.4 WS-BPEL..................... 54 2.2.5 SOAGovernance................. 55 2.2.6 Service Lifecycle Management . 56 2.3EnterpriseServiceBus................... 58 2.3.1 EvolutionfromMOMtoESB........... 59 2.3.2 MediationServices................ 59 2.3.3 Real-timeThroughputofData........... 60 2.3.4 Content-basedRouter............... 60 2.4SemanticWebTechnologies................ 60 2.4.1 ResourceDescriptionFramework......... 61 2.4.2 TheWebOntologyLanguage........... 61 2.4.3 SemanticWebServices.............. 62 2.5CurrentStateofIntegration................ 63 2.5.1 Overview of Production Environments . 63 2.5.2 Context-aware Applications and Integration . 65 2.5.3 Event-drivenSOA................. 66 2.5.4 Adaptive Business Management . 67 2.5.5 AModel-drivenApproach............. 68 2.5.6 ServiceProvenance................ 68 2.5.7 Limitations of Current Research . 69 2.6Summary.......................... 69 3 Principles of Integration for the Real-time Factory 71 3.1LessonsLearned...................... 72 3.2IntegrationScenario:theReal-timeFactory........ 73 Contents 9 3.3 Principles of Integration for Middleware Infrastructures . 77 3.3.1 EaseofReconfiguration.............. 78 3.3.2 LooseCoupling.................. 78 3.3.3 AsynchronousThinking.............. 79 3.3.4 Standards-basedIntegration............ 80 3.4 Principles of Integration for Real-time Factory Applications 81 3.4.1 Well-definedInterfaces.............. 81 3.4.2 Separation of Implementation and Interface . 82 3.4.3 Standards-basedInterfaces............ 82 3.5ServiceOrientationasanIntegrationApproach...... 83 3.6Summary.......................... 84 4 SOA in Manufacturing 86 4.1 Penetration and Current State of SOA in Manufacturing . 86 4.2 Leverage of a Data Integration System in SOA . 88 4.2.1 ChampagneasaService.............. 89 4.2.2 Connection of Champagne to an ESB . 91 4.3SOAIntegrationPrinciplesforPLM............ 92 4.4 SOA Principles applied to Reconfigurable Machines . 94 4.5Event-drivenBPMinETOEnterprises........... 95 4.6Product-ServiceSystems................. 100 4.7Summary.......................... 103 5 The Manufacturing Service Bus 104 5.1Concept.......................... 105 5.1.1 DataSourceLayer................. 108 5.1.2 DataServiceLayer................. 109 5.1.3 IntegrationLayer................. 109 5.1.4 IntegrationServiceLayer............. 110 5.1.5 BusinessProcessLayer.............. 111 5.2 Architecture of the Manufacturing Service Bus . 111 5.2.1 EventCanonicalModel.............. 112 10 Contents 5.2.2 EventandEvent-FlowRegistries......... 115 5.2.3 Content-basedRouter............... 116 5.2.4 MediationServices................ 119 5.2.5 WorkflowEngine................. 120 5.2.6 CoreImplementationoftheMSB......... 121 5.3ServiceManagement.................... 122 5.3.1 Life Cycle Management of Services and EAI Pro- cesses....................... 123 5.3.2 EAI Process Model for the Real-time Factory . 125 5.3.3 EAIProcessEditor................. 130 5.3.4 Provenance-aware Service Repository . 134 5.3.4.1 Semantic Service Provenance . 134 5.3.4.2 Service Provenance Query Language . 136 5.3.4.3 ArchitectureOverview......... 140 5.3.4.4 Implementation............. 146 5.3.5 Real-time Factory Integration Architecture . 149 5.4AgileAdaptationofEAIProcesses............. 151 5.4.1 Requirements for an Agile Adaptation in the Real- timeFactory.................... 152 5.4.1.1 FlexibleIntegration........... 153 5.4.1.2 Capability of Reconfiguration...... 154 5.4.1.3 Knowledge-driven Adaptation . 155 5.4.1.4 Autonomic Computing Mechanisms . 155 5.4.1.5 The MSB as Enabling Platform for Agile Adaptation............... 159 5.4.2 Autonomic Computing in the Real-time Factory . 160 5.4.2.1 Definitions............... 161 5.4.2.2 MAPE Cycle for EAI Processes . 164 5.4.2.3 The Real-time Factory Adaptation Model 166 5.4.2.4 SOA Lifecycle Gap in Manufacturing . 168 5.4.3 Monitoring and Analysis of Factory Data Streams 169 Contents 11 5.4.3.1 NexusDS................ 169 5.4.3.2 Integration of NexusDS into the MSB . 171 5.4.3.3 Mining Graph for Factory Data Streams 174 5.4.3.4 DomainKnowledgeAnalysis...... 178 5.4.4 Architecture for EAI Process Adaptation . 180 5.5Summary.......................... 183 6 Applicability and Evaluation 185 6.1TheLearningFactory:aFieldforEvaluation....... 186 6.2CaseStudies........................ 189 6.2.1 CustomerOrder.................. 189 6.2.2 FailureManagement................ 191 6.2.3 ServiceRevision.................. 192 6.2.4 Adaptation of the Failure Management Process
Recommended publications
  • Realizing a Digital Enterprise Driven by Standards
    Realizing a Digital Enterprise driven by standards This document refers to the Digital Enterprise as a business that not only creates and uses digital representations of the products and environment in which it operates; but aspires to trace an entire digital thread of its products as digital twins through their product lifecycle. Standards are an axiom for common enterprise understanding and the longevity of the digital thread used in Siemens product lifecycle management (PLM) solutions. These standards-driven solutions cover a breadth of industries, including discrete manufacturing, construction, marine and energy. This document addresses standards used in Siemens products that are principally aimed at discrete manufacturing across a wide range of domains, including auto- motive, aerospace and consumer products. A white paper issued by: Siemens PLM Software www.siemens.com/plm White paper | Realizing a Digital Enterprise driven by standards Contents Executive summary ............................................................3 Facing critical challenges ...................................................4 Background .........................................................................4 Business opportunities .........................................................5 Key considerations ..............................................................6 Strategic standards for the Digital Enterprise ....................7 PLM ....................................................................................7 MOM and automation ........................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • A Meta-Model for Leveraging the ISA- 88/95/106 Standards
    A meta-model for leveraging the ISA- 88/95/106 standards Introduction The story began in 1990 with the ISA-88 « Batch control » standard that addresses modular automation for flexible batch processes. It was followed by the ISA-95 « Enterprise – control systems integration » standard that deals with manufacturing operations management (MOPM, MES) and interoperability. The latest ISA-106 “Procedural Automation for Continuous Process Operations” standard tackles procedural control for continuous processes. These standards provide good engineering practices for improving control design for industrial facilities. ISA-88 and ISA-95 are respectively published as international standards IEC61512 and ISO/IEC62264. These standards share genetic concepts due to their consanguinity: many experts have contributed in the three standardization committees, which originated in ISA88. Though their viewpoint, terminology and abstraction level sensibly differ, the way they handle structural and behavioural aspects is relatively consistent, allowing a quite straightforward retro engineering of their implied meta-model. The interest of extracting a common meta-model of these standards is two-fold: - It allows understanding the respective scope of each standard and their overlap. - It makes easier to consider interoperability in the broader architectural approach of enterprise transformation Despite its technical and specialized content, this article may be of interest even for people who are not fluent in the discussed standards, but who could appreciate
    [Show full text]
  • INDUSTRY4.0 TECHNOLOGY BATTLES in MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Non-Technical Dominance Factors for Iiot & MES
    INDUSTRY4.0 TECHNOLOGY BATTLES IN MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT non-technical dominance factors for IIoT & MES Master thesis submitted to Delft University of Technology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Management of Technology Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management by ing. Aksel de Vries #1293087 To be defended in public on 09 February 2021. Graduation committee: Chair & First Supervisor: Prof.dr.ir. M.F.W.H.A. Janssen, ICT Second Supervisor: Dr. G. (Geerten) van de Kaa, ET&I Equinoxia Industrial Automation Impressum The cover photo shows the Djoser step pyramid. It was once high-tech and replaced old-school pyramid technology; the ruin in the front. The analogy is to the once high-tech Automation Pyramid: Figure 1: Automation Pyramid as advocated by MESA.org and ISA.org since 1986 A.D. About the author Aksel de Vries (1973) is a Chemical Process Engineer and has been work- ing in the field of Manufacturing Operations Management since 1998. At AspenTech Europe, Aksel delivered training and consultancy during the transition from Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM/21, Batch/21, SetCIM, etc.) to Industry4.0 on corporate vertical and horizontal inte- gration, fully leveraging ISA-88 and ISA-95. Aksel works as independent consultant www.equinoxia.eu since 2006 mainly in Biotech Pharma4.0 for System Integrators like Zenith Tech- nologies (now Cognizant) and blue-chip corporations such as DSM, GSK, BioNTech, Kite Pharma / Gilead Sciences, Amgen, Lonza, etc. Copyright © 2021 Equinoxia Industrial Automation, The Netherlands Aksel de Vries EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2011, the fourth industrial revolution was announced at the German Hannover Messe.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Data for Production Scheduling Using the ISA-95 Standard
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE METHODS ARTICLE published: 21provided October by 2014 Frontiers - Publisher Connector ENERGY RESEARCH doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2014.00044 Sharing data for production scheduling using the ISA-95 standard Iiro Harjunkoski* and Reinhard Bauer ABB Corporate Research, Industrial Software and Applications, Ladenburg, Germany Edited by: In the development and deployment of production scheduling solutions, one major chal- Gurkan Sin, Technical University of lenge is to establish efficient information sharing with industrial production management Denmark, Denmark systems. Information comprising production orders to be scheduled, processing plant Reviewed by: Pradeep Suresh, The Dow Chemical structure, product recipes, available equipment, and other resources are necessary for Company, USA producing a realistic short-term production plan. Currently, a widely accepted standard for Franjo Cecelja, University of Surrey, information sharing is missing. This often leads to the implementation of costly custom- UK tailored interfaces, or in the worst case the scheduling solution will be abandoned. Addition- Arun Giridhar, Engineering Research Center for Structured Organic ally, it becomes difficult to easily compare different methods on various problem instances, Particulate Systems, USA which complicates the re-use of existing scheduling solutions. In order to overcome these *Correspondence: hurdles, a platform-independent and holistic approach is needed. Nevertheless, it is difficult Iiro Harjunkoski, ABB Corporate for any new solution to gain wide acceptance within industry as new standards are often Research, Industrial Software and refused by companies already using a different established interface. From an acceptance Applications, Wallstadter Str. 59, Ladenburg 68526, Germany point of view, the ISA-95 standard could act as a neutral data-exchange platform.
    [Show full text]
  • A Service-Oriented Approach to Emaintenance of Complex
    2008:58 DOCTORAL T H E SIS Ramin Karim A Service-Oriented Approach to eMaintenance of Complex Technical Systems A Service-OrientedTechnical to Approach eMaintenance of Complex A Service-Oriented Approach to eMaintenance of Complex Technical Systems Ramin Karim Luleå University of Technology Department of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering 2008:58 Universitetstryckeriet, Luleå 2008:58|: 02-544|: - -- 08 ⁄58 -- A Service-Oriented Approach to eMaintenance of Complex Technical Systems Ramin Karim Luleå University of Technology Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering A Service-Oriented Approach to eMaintenance of Complex Technical Systems Everyone knows what time is until you start to think about it and then you realize you do not know. St. Aurelius Augustine (354-430 AD) During my research, I have frequently had cause to reflect on 6W$XJXVWLQH·V statement, and every time I did so I have realized how little I know! Page I Preface and Acknowledgements Preface and Acknowledgements This research has been carried out at the Division of Operation & Mainte- nance Engineering (O&M) at Luleå University of Technology. The activities related to in this research have been managed through a joint industrial and academic project. I have been supported by many people in different ways during this time. Their support has been essential to achieve milestones within this work. First of all, I would like to convey my appreciation to Saab Aerotech and the Swedish National Aeronautics Research Programme (NFFP) that have made this research possible through their financial support. I am also indebted to Professor Uday Kumar (my main supervisor); Assistant Professor Peter Söderholm (my primary co-supervisor) and Associate Profes- sor Mira Kajko-Mattsson (my secondary co-supervisor), who have supported me during this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid-IDS-Based-On-ISA95
    A hybrid intrusion detection system in industry 4.0 based on ISA95 standard Salwa Alem, David Espes, Eric Martin, Laurent Nana, Florent de Lamotte To cite this version: Salwa Alem, David Espes, Eric Martin, Laurent Nana, Florent de Lamotte. A hybrid intrusion detection system in industry 4.0 based on ISA95 standard. 2020. hal-02506109v2 HAL Id: hal-02506109 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02506109v2 Preprint submitted on 8 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A hybrid intrusion detection system in industry 4.0 based on ISA95 standard Salwa Alema;∗, David Espesb, Eric Martina, Laurent Nanab, Florent De Lamottea, aUniversity Bretagne Sud, Lab-STICC (Laboratoire des Sciences et Techniques de l'Information de la Communication et de la Connaissance), Lorient, France bUniversity of Western Brittany, Lab-STICC (Laboratoire des Sciences et Techniques de l'Information, de la Communication et de la Connaissance), Brest, France Abstract—Today with the emergence of an industrial In recent years, industries have been victims of attacks information system in industry of the future which includes the that came from the IT world and spread to the OT world connection between all trades, applications and the converged such as Stuxnet in Iran, Slammer in US, Shamoon in Saudi technologies between information technology and operational technology, cybersecurity has become urgent.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC/ISO 62264) Industrial Systems Interoperability Operations Management Overview
    ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC/ISO 62264) Industrial Systems Interoperability Operations Management Overview 3 Integrated Manufacturing Systems in the Context of Industry 4.0 Agenda ■ ISA-95 scope ■ ISA-95 (inferred) ontology ■ ISA-95 content ■ ISA-95 usage examples 2 Supply Chain SCOR Model Main SCM processes 3 Supply Chain information flows – ISA-95 scope PLAN Forecasts Planning & Demand Scheduling Demand Aggregation Sales Purchases B2M B2B B2B CRM SRM Schedule Performance Operations Capability definition Capacity (Suppliers) Manufacturing (Customers) SOURCE MAKE DELIVER 4 ISA95 snapshot ■ B2M: Collaboration Business / Execution Communication between execution systems (MES/MOM, DCS, MMS, LIMS, WES, SCADA,…) and business systems (ERP, SCM) Master data management ■ MES/MOM : Functional definition ■ Data and Activity models Description of resources, capability, products, work order requests and reports Definition of operation management activities (MES) ■ Applications: User requirements and functional specification of MES and B2M interfaces Native B2M connectors - MES/ERP (B2MML) Possible basis for developing MES applications and software… 5 Agenda ■ ISA-95 scope ■ ISA-95 (inferred) ontology ■ ISA-95 content ■ ISA-95 usage examples 6 Abstract system model Behaviour (dynammics) Structure (potential) Matter , Action Information Energy Energy, Matter, Information 7 ISA-88/95 industrial system upper ontology Behaviour Structure Operation Process Management ISA-95 Physical Process Management resoures , segments resources resources Physical Process
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary Lean, Six Sigma
    ATS MES Excellence Centres Lean, Six Sigma ation, Quality & IT IT & Quality ation, & MES Dictionary Solution Provider for Industrial and Process Autom Process and Industrial for Provider Solution For all kinds of industries www.ats-lean-six.com Independent The The Lean, Six Sigma & MES Dictionary ATS White Paper Having trouble understanding all terms related to Lean, Six Sigma and MES? We have selected the most commonly used words for your reference. This dictionary can be found also on the website www.ats-lean-six.com . 21CFR Part 11 A rule created by the FDA to facilitate introduction of electronic technology in the ation, Quality & IT IT & Quality ation, process of FDA submissions as well as in manufacturing and production. Part 11 was created to provide common sense guidelines on how to implement electronic equivalents of audit trail and signature processes previously ATS manufacturing solutions help since 1986. performed on paper. Adaptive Manufacturing 5 Whys Adaptive Manufacturing is a product paradigm Methodology used to determine root cause of where a design concept for automation is tied a defect or problem. This methodology uses to a concept 'production to product'. It contains question-asking to explore the cause/effect the integration of all systems of the production relationships underlying a particular problem. and business level, e.g. SCADA, LIMS, Historian, SPC, MES, up to ERP, SCM, or Data Warehouse. Adaptive production is a 5-Why Analysis large-scale integration, an allocation of See 5 Whys. intelligent services: Data and information from production and business systems get merged on a common platform to combine with each 5S other and provide significant KPIs.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of a Data Exchange Format for Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems
    Selection of a Data Exchange Format for Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems Ricardo Silva Peres1, Mafalda Parreira-Rocha1, Andre Dionisio Rocha1, Jose´ Barbosa2, Paulo Leitao˜ 2, and Jose´ Barata1 1CTS - UNINOVA, Faculdade de Cienciasˆ e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal, Email: fricardo.peres, mafalda.rocha, andre.rocha, [email protected] 2Polytechnic Institute of Braganc¸a, Portugal, Email: fjbarbosa, [email protected] Abstract—With the emergence of the Industry 4.0 concept, or standard interfaces and common semantics as key enablers of the fourth industrial revolution, the industry is bearing witness interoperability within project itself. to the appearance of more and more complex systems, often requiring the integration of various new heterogeneous, modular A. The PERFoRM Project and intelligent elements with pre-existing legacy devices. This challenge of interoperability is one of the main concerns taken The PERFoRM project is aligned with the Industry 4.0 into account when designing such systems-of-systems, commonly vision aiming the conceptual transformation of existing indus- requiring the use of standard interfaces to ensure this seamless trial production systems towards plug and produce production integration. To aid in tackling this challenge, a common format systems to achieve flexible manufacturing environments based for data exchange should be adopted. Thus, a study to select the foundations for the development of such a format is hereby on rapid and seamless reconfiguration of machinery and robots presented, taking into account the specific needs of four different as response to operational or business events. An important use cases representing varied key European industry sectors. assumption, as an innovation action, is not to create a new system architecture from scratch but instead to use the best I.
    [Show full text]
  • ISA 88 and ISA 95 1 Standards Certification Sunil S Shah, Phd
    National Symposium on Automation & Digital Transformation of Food & Beverage Industry 26th & 27th February 2016 Overviewing the Standards: ISA 88 and ISA 95 1 Standards Certification Sunil S Shah, PhD Education & Training Secretary, ISA Bangalore Section /20160226/Slide No. /20160226/Slide Publishing [email protected] Symp Conferences & Exhibits ISAB/F&B Basics of Modern Industrial Automation Sunil S Shah Academic: - B. E. (Chemical Engineering), Regional Engineering College (now NIT), Rourkela - Ph. D. (Systems and Control Engineering), IIT- Bombay Currently working with: - Owner of Startup, Communications, Diagnostics, and Controls/ CDC Worked With: - GE Oil and Gas, Sr Product Manager (Global), Rotating Machinery Controls - GE Global Research Center, Bangalore leading the Electromechanical Control Systems Lab - CAD Center, Indian Institute of Technology- Bombay , Mumbai as Principal Research Engineer - Davy Powergas India Pvt Ltd (now Kvaerner Powergas), Bombay as Principal Process Engineer 2 Association: - Senior Member and Secretary (Bangalore Section), International Society of Automation (ISA) /20160226 /Slide No. No. /20160226 /Slide Symp - Senior Member and Ex-Secretary, IEEE Control Systems Society, Bengaluru Chapter ISAB /F&B ISAB Basics ofAgenda Modern Industrial Automation • Introducing Standards • ISA’s Standards for Automation • Overview and need for implementation • ISA 88- Batch Control Systems • ISA 95 - Enterprise - Control System Integration • Path forward 3 • Developing the Standards Team /20160226 /Slide No. No. /20160226 /Slide Symp ISAB /F&B ISAB BasicsWhat of Modern is a Standard? Industrial Automation . A “Standard” is an authoritative document, developed in accordance with a strict predefined methodology, embodying such principles as balance of interests and consensus and incorporating stringent review and documentation process . Special status- . RAGAGEP: Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practice .
    [Show full text]
  • Application Integration for Production Operations Management Using Opc Unified Architecture
    Jouko Virta APPLICATION INTEGRATION FOR PRODUCTION OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT USING OPC UNIFIED ARCHITECTURE Faculty of Electronics, Communications and Automation Thesis submitted for examination for the degree of Master of Science in Technology. Espoo 5.5.2010 Thesis supervisor: Prof. Kari Koskinen Thesis instructor: Dr.Sc. (Tech.) Ilkka Seilonen Aalto University School of Science A! and Technology aalto university abstract of the school of science and technology master's thesis Author: Jouko Virta Title: Application integration for production operations management using OPC Unified Architecture Date: May 5th, 2010 Number of pages: 10 + 59 Faculty: Faculty of Electronics, Communications and Automation Department: Department of Automation and Systems Technology Professorship: AS-116 Information and Computer Systems in Automation Supervisor: Prof. Kari Koskinen Instructor: Ilkka Seilonen, Dr.Sc.(Tech.) A modern manufacturing company employs many information systems which require both vertical and horizontal integration in order to enable effective manufacturing operations management. The integration confronts many challenges, like different interfaces, a large amount of information to exchange and the lack of standardized information models. OPC Unified Architecture (OPC UA) specification defines a platform-independent data exchange interface which enables exchanging complex information models. It provides an interface not only for read and write operations and method calls but also for transmitting asynchronous events. The ISA-95 standard can
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Execution System Framework
    Prof. Dr. ing. Johannes Cottyn LEANDESIGN OF A MANUFACTURING EXECUTION SYSTEM FRAMEWORK With A Foreword BY Marc Blekkink (Movilitas) www.movilitas.com Design of a Lean Manufacturing Execution System Framework Copyright © 2011-2014 Johannes Cottyn - University of Ghent. All rights reserved. !I Table of Contents Table of Contents II List of Figures V List of Tables IX List of Acronyms XI Foreword XVI Executive Summary XVIII 1. Introduction 22 1.1. Research Area 22 1.2. Research Questions 25 1.3. Research Methodology 26 1.4. Publications 29 1.4.1. Publications in international journals (A1 — appearing in Web of Science) 29 1.4.2. Publications in peer-reviewed international conferences (P1 — appearing in Web of Science) 29 1.4.3. Publications in international conferences (C1) 29 1.4.4. Other (A4) 30 2. Literature Review 31 2.1. Manufacturing Operations Management (MOM) 32 2.1.1. Definition 32 2.1.2. Evolution 36 2.1.3. Role of standardization 38 2.2. Lean thinking 44 2.2.1. The Lean philosophy 44 2.2.2. Lean tools and techniques 45 2.2.3. Lean metrics and assessment 52 2.3. Lean & IT 53 2.3.1. Lean look at IT 53 2.3.2. Software support for Lean 56 !II 2.4. The role of MES in CI 58 2.4.1. Manufacturing Intelligence (MI) 59 2.4.2. Data & analysis support 66 2.4.3. Control achieved improvements 68 2.5. Conclusion 69 3. Lean MES Framework 71 3.1. Alignment method 72 3.2. Lean MES framework 77 3.3.
    [Show full text]