DOCSLIB.ORG

New Resonance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Resonance MILESTONES DOI: M iles Tone 8 10.1038/nphys863 New resonance If, during the 1920s and 1930s, the The effect itself was not entirely The coming atomic nucleus had seemed of interest new. In 1938, Isidor Rabi had used of the nuclear to few besides the (mostly) gentle- it to measure magnetic moments man scientists studying it, by the end of both atomic species in a lithium age was an of the Second World War its wider chloride molecular beam, receiving appropriate cue… importance was abundantly clear. the 1944 Nobel Prize in Physics for for arguably the The coming of the nuclear age was that advance. Even earlier, the Dutch most widespread an appropriate cue for the two papers physicist Cornelis J. Gorter had 7 practical that cleared the way for arguably the looked for the resonance of Li in most widespread practical application lithium fluoride and 1H in alum, using First NMR signals from water. Image reprinted with permission application of from Bloch, F., Hansen, W. W. and Packard, M. Phys. Rev. 70, of nuclear spin today: nuclear a calorimetric method. Hampered 474–485 (1946) [http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v70/i7-8/ nuclear spin magnetic resonance (NMR) by experimental vagaries and limited p474_1] ; courtesy of the American Physical Society. today. spectroscopy. resources, he published a negative The 1946 work of Edward Mills result. (In later years, on receiving identification of free radicals. Zavoisky Purcell at the Massachusetts Institute a prize for his contributions to low- might also have been the first to see an of Technology and Felix Bloch at temperature physics, Gorter would NMR signal, but he did not follow it Stanford University gave new muse on his strange ability to miss out up, at least not with publications. Had relevance to one object of intense on groundbreaking discoveries in this the vicissitudes of the age been less, gentlemanly interest before the war; and other instances.) and the dissemination of scientific the Zeeman splitting of nuclear The innovations offered by Bloch information easier, his claim might spin states in a magnetic field and Purcell’s approaches were the have been better heard in the West. As (Milestone 1). The degree of transition to real liquid and solid it was, the 1952 Nobel Prize in Physics splitting at a particular magnetic systems, and, in Bloch’s case, the use went to Bloch and Purcell. field strength depends on the of an induction coil to pick up and Richard Webb, Senior Editor, gyromagnetic ratio of the nucleus. sharpen the resonance signal. These Nature News & Views In NMR, a second, transverse field opened the way for the use of NMR ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERS Gorter, C. J. at the characteristic (typically radio) in all manner of contexts, including Negative results of an attempt to detect nuclear spin-transition frequency produces in living tissue — where it became magnetic spins. Physica 9, 995–998 (1936) | Rabi, an absorption resonance — a power- the lynchpin of magnetic resonance I. I., Zacharias, J. R., Millman, S. & Kusch, P. A new method of measuring nuclear magnetic moment. ful way to identify the nuclei present imaging (Milestone 14). Phys. Rev. 53, 318 (1938) | Zavoisky, E. Relaxation in a sample. In 1944, although shielded in of liquid solutions for perpendicular fields. 1 J. Phys. USSR 9, 211–216 (1945) | Purcell, E. M., Purcell et al. brought protons ( H) the relative obscurity of Kazan in Torrey, H. C. & Pound, R. V. Resonance absorption in solid paraffin to resonance; Bloch the steppes of Tatarstan, the Soviet by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys. et al. did the same in liquid water. The physicist Yevgeny Zavoisky published Rev. 69, 37–38 (1946) | Bloch, F., Hansen, W. W. & Packard, M. Nuclear induction. Phys. Rev. 69, 127 coincident timing was no accident: the first measurements of an analo- (1946) | Zavoisky, E. Spin magnetic resonance the development of radar technologies gous effect involving electron spins. in the decimetre-wave region. J. Phys. USSR 10, during the war, for which several of Electron paramagnetic resonance 197–198 (1946) FUrTher reading Gorter, C. J. Bad luck in the researchers involved had won their depends on an atom possessing an attempts to make scientific discoveries. Phys. spurs, had made sources of radiofre- unpaired electron, thereby limiting Today 20 (1), 76–81 (1967) | Kochelaev, B. I. & Yablokov, Y. V. The Beginning of Paramagnetic quency radiation freely available for the range of its application, but Resonance (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995) the first time. making it useful for the detection and nature MILESTONES | SPIn march 2008 © 2008 Nature Publishing Group .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edward Mills Purcell (1912–1997)
    ARTICLE-IN-A-BOX Edward Mills Purcell (1912–1997) Edward Purcell grew up in a small town in the state of Illinois, USA. The telephone equipment which his father worked with professionally was an early inspiration. His first degree was thus in electrical engineering, from Purdue University in 1933. But it was in this period that he realized his true calling – physics. After a year in Germany – almost mandatory then for a young American interested in physics! – he enrolled in Harvard for a physics degree. His thesis quickly led to working on the Harvard cyclotron, building a feedback system to keep the radio frequency tuned to the right value for maximum acceleration. The story of how the Manhattan project brought together many of the best physicists to build the atom bomb has been told many times. Not so well-known but equally fascinating is the story of radar, first in Britain and then in the US. The MIT radiation laboratory was charged with developing better and better radar for use against enemy aircraft, which meant going to shorter and shorter wavelengths and detecting progressively weaker signals. This seems to have been a crucial formative period in Purcell’s life. His coauthors on the magnetic resonance paper, Torrey and Pound, were both from this lab. I I Rabi, the physicist who won the 1944 Nobel Prize for measuring nuclear magnetic moments by resonance methods in molecular beams, was the head of the lab and a major influence on Purcell. Interestingly, Felix Bloch (see article on p.956 in this issue) was at the nearby Radio Research lab but it appears that the two did not interact much.
    [Show full text]
  • I. I. Rabi Papers [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress. [PDF Rendered Tue Apr
    I. I. Rabi Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 1992 Revised 2010 March Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms998009 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm89076467 Prepared by Joseph Sullivan with the assistance of Kathleen A. Kelly and John R. Monagle Collection Summary Title: I. I. Rabi Papers Span Dates: 1899-1989 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1945-1968) ID No.: MSS76467 Creator: Rabi, I. I. (Isador Isaac), 1898- Extent: 41,500 items ; 105 cartons plus 1 oversize plus 4 classified ; 42 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Physicist and educator. The collection documents Rabi's research in physics, particularly in the fields of radar and nuclear energy, leading to the development of lasers, atomic clocks, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to his 1944 Nobel Prize in physics; his work as a consultant to the atomic bomb project at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory and as an advisor on science policy to the United States government, the United Nations, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization during and after World War II; and his studies, research, and professorships in physics chiefly at Columbia University and also at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science
    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Government: a Nobel Profession
    The Federal Government: A Nobel Profession A Report on Pathbreaking Nobel Laureates in Government 1901 - 2002 INTRODUCTION The Nobel Prize is synonymous with greatness. A list of Nobel Prize winners offers a quick register of the world’s best and brightest, whose accomplishments in literature, economics, medicine, science and peace have enriched the lives of millions. Over the past century, 270 Americans have received the Nobel Prize for innovation and ingenuity. Approximately one-fourth of these distinguished individuals are, or were, federal employees. Their Nobel contributions have resulted in the eradication of polio, the mapping of the human genome, the harnessing of atomic energy, the achievement of peace between nations, and advances in medicine that not only prolong our lives, but “This report should serve improve their quality. as an inspiration and a During Public Employees Recognition Week (May 4-10, 2003), in an effort to recognize and honor the reminder to us all of the ideas and accomplishments of federal workers past and present, the Partnership for Public Service offers innovation and nobility of this report highlighting 50 American Nobel laureates the work civil servants do whose award-winning achievements occurred while they served in government or whose public service every day and its far- work had an impact on their career achievements. They were honored for their contributions in the fields reaching impact.” of Physiology or Medicine, Economic Sciences, and Physics and Chemistry. Also included are five Americans whose work merited the Peace Prize. Despite this legacy of accomplishment, too few Americans see the federal government as an incubator for innovation and discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • FELIX BLOCH October 23, 1905-September 10, 1983
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES F E L I X B L O C H 1905—1983 A Biographical Memoir by RO BE R T H OFSTADTER Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1994 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. FELIX BLOCH October 23, 1905-September 10, 1983 BY ROBERT HOFSTADTER ELIX BLOCH was a historic figure in the development of Fphysics in the twentieth century. He was one among the great innovators who first showed that quantum me- chanics was a valid instrument for understanding many physi- cal phenomena for which there had been no previous ex- planation. Among many contributions were his pioneering efforts in the quantum theory of metals and solids, which resulted in what are called "Bloch Waves" or "Bloch States" and, later, "Bloch Walls," which separate magnetic domains in ferromagnetic materials. His name is associated with the famous Bethe-Bloch formula, which describes the stopping of charged particles in matter. The theory of "Spin Waves" was also developed by Bloch. His early work on the mag- netic scattering of neutrons led to his famous experiment with Alvarez that determined the magnetic moment of the neutron. In carrying out this resonance experiment, Bloch realized that magnetic moments of nuclei in general could be measured by resonance methods. This idea led to the discovery of nuclear magnetic resonance, which Bloch origi- nally called nuclear induction. For this and the simulta- neous and independent work of E.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years of BCS Theory “A Family Tree” Ancestors BCS Descendants
    APS March Meeting 2007 50 Years of BCS Theory “A Family Tree” Ancestors BCS Descendants D. Scalapino: Ancestors and BCS J. Rowell : A “tunneling” branch of the family G. Baym: From Atoms and Nuclei to the Cosmos Supraconductivity 1911 H. Kamerlingh Onnes `(Gilles Holst) finds a sudden drop in the resistance of Hg at ~ 4.2K. R(ohms) T 1933 Meissner and Ochsenfeld discover that superconductors are perfect diamagnets --flux expulsion Robert Ochsenfeld 1901 - 1993 Phenomenolog` y • 1934 Casimir and Gorter ‘s two-fluid phenomenological model of thermodynamic properties. • 1934 Heinz and Fritz London’s phenomenological electrodynamics. F. London’s suggestion of the rigidity of the wave function. • 1948 Fritz London, “Quantum mechanics on a macroscopic scale, long range order in momentum.” Fritz London (1900-1954) 1950 Ginzburg-Landau Theory n∗ ! e∗ β f(x) = Ψ(x) + A(x)Ψ(x) 2 + α Ψ(x) 2 + Ψ(x) 4 2m∗ | i ∇ c | | | 2 | | β +α Ψ(x) 2 + Ψ(x) 4 | | 2 | | V. Ginzburg L. Landau 1957 Type II Superconductivity Aleksei Abrikosov But the question remained: “How does it work?” R.P. Feynman ,1956 Seattle Conference But the question remained: “How does it work?” A long list of the leading theoretical physicists in the world had taken up the challenge of developing a microscopic theory of superconductivity. A.Einstein,“Theoretische Bemerkungen zur Supraleitung der Metalle” Gedenkboek Kamerlingh Onnes, p.435 ( 1922 ) translated by B. Schmekel cond-mat/050731 “...metallic conduction is caused by atoms exchanging their peripheral electrons. It seems unavoidable that supercurrents are carried by closed chains of molecules” “Given our ignorance of quantum mechanics of composite systems, we are far away from being able to convert these vague ideas into a theory.” Felix Bloch is said to have joked that ”superconductivity is impossible”.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter 181KB
    Memorial Tributes: Volume 6 2 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 6 JOHN BARDEEN 3 John Bardeen 1908-1991 By Nick Holonyak, Jr. IN JOHN BARDEEN'S own words: In any field there are golden ages during which advances are made at a rapid pace. In solid-state physics, three stand out. One, the early years of the present century, followed the discoveries of x rays, the electron, Planck's quantum of energy, and the nuclear atom—the discoveries that ushered in the atomic era. The Drude-Lorentz electron theory of metals and Einstein's applications of the quantum principle to lattice vibrations in solids and to the photoelectric effect date from this period. Von Laue's suggestion in 1912 that a crystal lattice should act as a diffraction grating for x rays and research of the W. H. and W. L. Bragg [sic] opened up the vast field of x-ray structure determination. The foundations of the field were firmly established during a second very active period, from about 1928 until the mid-thirties, which followed the discovery of quantum mechanics. Many of the world's leading theorists were involved in this effort. The Bloch theory, based on the one-electron model, introduced the concept of energy bands and showed why solids, depending on the electronic structure, may be metals, insulators, or semiconductors. The fundamentals of the theory of transport of electricity and of heat in solids were established. In these same years, the importance for many crystal properties of the role of imperfections in the crystal lattice, such as vacant lattice sites, dislocations, and impurity atoms was beginning to be recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Purcell Was Continuously Sought out As a Consultant and Advisor
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES EDWARD MILLS PURCELL 1912–1997 A Biographical Memoir by ROBERT V. POUND Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 78 PUBLISHED 2000 BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. EDWARD MILLS PURCELL August 30, 1912–March7, 1997 BY ROBERT V. POUND DWARD MILLS PURCELL, Nobel laureate for physics in 1952, E died on March 7, 1997, of respiratory failure at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He had tried valiantly to regain his strength after suffering leg fractures in a fall in 1996, but recurring bacterial lung infections requiring extended hospitalizations repeatedly set back his recovery. Two of the best known of Purcell’s many outstanding scientific achievements are his 1945 discovery with colleagues Henry C. Torrey and Robert V. Pound of nuclear magnetic resonant absorption (NMR), and in 1951 his successful detection with Harold I. Ewen of the emission of radiation at 1421 MHz by atomic hydrogen in the interstellar medium. Each of these fundamental discoveries has led to an extra- ordinary range of developments. NMR, for example, ini- tially conceived as a way to reveal properties of atomic nuclei, has become a major tool for research in material sciences, chemistry, and even medicine, where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now an indispensable tool. Radio spec- troscopy of atoms and molecules in space, following from the detection of the hyperfine transition in hydrogen as the first example, has become a major part of the ever- expanding field of radio astronomy. 3 4 BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS Purcell made ingenious contributions in biophysics, as exemplified by his famous analysis of life at low Reynolds numbers, which described the locomotion of bacteria in water.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb” Is a Short History of the Origins and Develop- Ment of the American Atomic Bomb Program During World War H
    f.IOE/MA-0001 -08 ‘9g [ . J vb JMkirlJkhilgUimBA’mmml — .— Q RDlmm UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ,:.. .- ..-. .. -,.,,:. ,.<,.;<. ~-.~,.,.- -<.:,.:-,------—,.--,,p:---—;-.:-- ---:---—---- -..>------------.,._,.... ,/ ._ . ... ,. “ .. .;l, ..,:, ..... ..’, .’< . Copies of this publication are available while supply lasts from the OffIce of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. BOX 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Attention: Information Services Telephone: (423) 576-8401 Also Available: The United States Department of Energy: A Summary History, 1977-1994 @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper DO13MA-0001 a +~?y I I Tho PROJEOT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY F.G. Gosling History Division Executive Secretariat Management and Administration Department of Energy ]January 1999 edition . DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. I DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 1 Foreword The Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977 brought together for the first time in one department most of the Federal Government’s energy programs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Quantum-Mechanical Electron Theory of Metals: 1928---1933
    The development of the quantum-mechanical electron theory of metals: 1S28—1933 Lillian Hoddeson and Gordon Bayrn Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, illinois 6180f Michael Eckert Deutsches Museum, Postfach 260102, 0-8000 Munich 26, Federal Republic of Germany We trace the fundamental developments and events, in their intellectual as well as institutional settings, of the emergence of the quantum-mechanical electron theory of metals from 1928 to 1933. This paper contin- ues an earlier study of the first phase of the development —from 1926 to 1928—devoted to finding the gen- eral quantum-mechanical framework. Solid state, by providing a large and ready number of concrete prob- lems, functioned during the period treated here as a target of application for the recently developed quan- tum mechanics; a rush of interrelated successes by numerous theoretical physicists, including Bethe, Bloch, Heisenberg, Peierls, Landau, Slater, and Wilson, established in these years the network of concepts that structure the modern quantum theory of solids. We focus on three examples: band theory, magnetism, and superconductivity, the former two immediate successes of the quantum theory, the latter a persistent failure in this period. The history revolves in large part around the theoretical physics institutes of the Universi- ties of Munich, under Sommerfeld, Leipzig under Heisenberg, and the Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) in Zurich under Pauli. The year 1933 marked both a climax and a transition; as the lay- ing of foundations reached a temporary conclusion, attention began to shift from general formulations to computation of the properties of particular solids. CONTENTS mechanics of electrons in a crystal lattice (Bloch, 1928); these were followed by the further development in Introduction 287 1928—1933 of the quantum-mechanical basis of the I.
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Bloch and Twentieth-Century Physics
    Felix Bloch RICE UNIVERSITY STUDIES FELIX BLOCH AND TWENTIETH-CENTURY PHYSICS Dedicated to Felix Bloch on the Occasion of his Seventy-Fifth Birthday M. CHODOROW, R. HOFSTADTER, H. E. RORSCHACH, and A. L. SCHAWLOW, Editors H. GUTFREUND W. A. LITTLE E. L. HAHN JOHN D. ROBERTS WALTER A. HARRISON MICHAEL SCHICK 0LEG JARDETZKY HANS H. STAUB CARSON D. JEFFRIES H. SUHL WALTER KOHN NORMA W ADE-JARDETZKY L. KOWARSKI J.D. WALECKA WILLIS LAMB CHEN NING YANG AYISHA Y YANIY PUBLISHED BY WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY HOUSTON, TEXAS Vol. 66, No. 3 Summer 1980 Copyright I 980 by Rice University US-ISSN-0035-4996 US-ISBN-0-89263-246-1 This work relates to Department of the Navy Research Grant N00014-80-G-0063 issued by the Office of Naval Research. The United States Government has a royalty-free license throughout the world in all copyrightable material contained herein. VJ ~~ C. Q I> FELIX BLOCH This volume is dedicated to Felix Bloch on the occasion of his seventy­ fifth birthday. The editors hope that these papers by former students and colleagues will entertain and enlighten and will convey a sense of the high respect and regard in which Felix is held by all who have been privileged to be his associates. We also hope that the broad range of these papers will be indicative of the impact of his work on twentieth-century physics. One expects that book-editing will be a frustrating chore. This book was quite otherwise. The authors were eager to write, quick to submit their manuscripts, and anxious to be a part of this heartfelt expression of love and respect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reason for Beam Cooling: Some of the Physics That Cooling Allows
    The Reason for Beam Cooling: Some of the Physics that Cooling Allows Eagle Ridge, Galena, Il. USA September 18 - 23, 2005 Walter Oelert IKP – Forschungszentrum Jülich Ruhr – Universität Bochum CERN obvious: cooling and control of cooling is the essential reason for our existence, gives us the opportunity to do and talk about physics that cooling allows • 1961 – 1970 • 1901 – 1910 1961 – Robert Hofstadter (USA) 1901 – Wilhelm Conrad R¨ontgen (Deutschland) 1902 – Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (Niederlande) und Rudolf M¨ossbauer (Deutschland) Pieter (Niederlande) 1962 – Lev Landau (UdSSR) 1903 – Antoine Henri Becquerel (Frankreich) 1963 – Eugene Wigner (USA) und Marie Curie (Frankreich) Pierre Curie (Frankreich) Maria Goeppert-Mayer (USA) und J. Hans D. Jensen (Deutschland) 1904 – John William Strutt (Großbritannien und Nordirland) 1964 – Charles H. Townes (USA) , 1905 – Philipp Lenard (Deutschland) Nikolai Gennadijewitsch Bassow (UdSSR) und 1906 – Joseph John Thomson (Großbritannien-und-Nordirland) Alexander Michailowitsch Prochorow (UdSSR) und 1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson (USA) 1965 – Richard Feynman (USA), Julian Schwinger (USA) Shinichiro Tomonaga (Japan) 1908 – Gabriel Lippmann (Frankreich) 1966 – Alfred Kastler (Frankreich) 1909 – Ferdinand Braun (Deutschland) und Guglielmo Marconi (Italien) 1967 – Hans Bethe (USA) 1910 – Johannes Diderik van der Waals (Niederlande) 1968 – Luis W. Alvarez (USA) 1969 – Murray Gell-Mann (USA) 1970 – Hannes AlfvAn¨ (Schweden) • 1911 – 1920 Louis N¨oel (Frankreich) 1911 – Wilhelm Wien (Deutschland) 1912 – Gustaf
    [Show full text]