<<

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of

12-2002

Description of Paranoplocephala etholeni n. sp. (: Anoplocephalidae) in the Meadow pennsylvanicus, with a Synopsis of Paranoplocehala s. l. in Holarctic

Voitto Haukisalmi Finnish Forest Research Institute, [email protected]

H. Henttonen Finnish Forest Research Institute

J. Niemimaa Finnish Forest Research Institute

Robert L. Rausch University of Washington, [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs

Part of the Parasitology Commons

Haukisalmi, Voitto; Henttonen, H.; Niemimaa, J.; and Rausch, Robert L., "Description of Paranoplocephala etholeni n. sp. (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) in the Meadow Vole Microtus pennsylvanicus, with a Synopsis of Paranoplocehala s. l. in Holarctic Rodents" (2002). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 514. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/514

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

DESCRIPTION OF PARANOPLOCEPHALA ETHOLENI N. SP. {CESTODA: ANOPLOCEPHALIDAE} IN THE MEADOW VOLE MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS, WITH A SYNOPSIS OF PARANOPLOCEPHALA S. L. IN HOLARCTIC RODENTS

HAUKISALlVll V.*, HENTTONEN H.*, NIEMIMAA].* & RAUSCH RL.**

Summary: Resume: DI'SCRIPTION DE PARA.vOFLOCFI'IIAL4 VI! /OLbiV! 1\. SP. (CESTOIlA: ANOPLOCEPHAUIlAE) CHEZ LE CA,VlI'ACNOL DES PRAIRIES n. sp, parasitizing the meadow vole Paranoplocephala etholeni .i.lIfCHUn's PH,V,,\SHl:4i\,/C'{/S, AVEC l-:"-J SY\l(WSIS DE P/1RANO!JIDCEPHAJA Mierotus pennsylvanicus in Alaska and Wisconsm, USA. is S. L. CHI'/. LES RONCElIRS IIOLAReTI1)IIES described Poranaplocephala etholeni is morphologically most Nous deerivons Poranoplocephala etholeni n. sp., parasite du closely related to the Nearctic Paranoplocephala ondatrae Campagnol des Prairies Microtus pennsylvanicus en Alaska et [Rausch, 1948) Available data suggest that P etholeni is a host­ Wisconsin. Poranoplocephalo etholeni est morphologiquement Ie specific. locally rare species that may have a wide but sporadic plus proche de I'espeee nearetique Poranoplocephala ondatrae geographical distribution in . The finding of (Rausch, /948) Les donnees disponibles suggerent que P. ondatrae-like cestodes in Microtus spp. suggests that this poorly P etholeni est one espece dont I'hote est speedique et locolement known species may actually be a parasite of rather than rare, mais neanmoins avec une aire de repartition large et musklat (type hostl A tabular synopsis of all the known species of sporadique en Amerique du Nord. La decouverte de eestodes du Paranoplocephala s I in the Holarctic region with theil main type P ondatroe dons des espeees de eampagnols Mierotus spp. morphological features is presented suggerent que eette espeee peu connue est en fait une espece KEYWORDS: PuronclplclCetJholc etholefll n. sp ondalioe. parasite des campagnols, plutot que du rot musque (deerit comme Cestoda. Cy.clolohvllidE?a i'.noFllocepr,alieJoe An'Jpl(JCephcllin(Je .Mlcro/us hote type) Un synopsis sous forme de tableau de toutes les pennsylVOrllCU5 , especes de Poranoplocephalo s. I. de 10 region holaret/que avec leurs coracteristiques morphologiques est donne

MOTS CLES: Paranclp!c1celJholc etholeni n. 5,0, ~aron()plc)ceIJhcllc ondotroe, Cestoda, Microtus pennsylvonicus,

INTRODUCTION Rausch & Schiller, 1949; Rausch, 1952; Kuns & Rausch, 1950; Lubinsky, 1957; Kinsella, 1967; Whitaker & Aclalis, noplocephaline cestodes representing the genus 1971). Paranoplocephala macrocephala (Douthitt, Paranoplocephala Llihe, 1910 s. I. are ubiqui­ 1915) and Paranoplocephala primordialis (Douthitt, ous parasites of voles and (Arvico­ 1915) (both originally assigned to Andrya) have fre­ linae) (e.g. Rausch, 1976; Tenora et al., 1985; IIauki­ quently been reported as parasites of M. pennsylva­ salmi et al., 2001). At least 27 species are known from nicus. However, the concept of P. macrocephala has IIolarctic rodents, 10 of which parasitize primarily been velY broad, and it is probable that other species voles of the genus Microtus Schrank Crable 1; see also of Paranoplocephala have also been reported under Tenora et al., 1986). Only one of these, Paranoploce­ this name (Rausch, 1976). The of P. pri­ phala omphalodes (lIermann, 1783), is known to have mordialis is equally unsettled (Rausch, 1952; Hauki­ a Holarctic distribution (Rausch, 1976). salmi & Henttonen, 2001). The meadow vole, iVIierotus permsylvanicus (Ord), has Although the range of the meadow vole covers a a vast geographical distribution in North America, and considerable part of Alaska, there are no records of it has been subject to several helminthological inves­ Paranoplocephala in M. pennsylvanicus from that tigations (e.g. Erickson, 1938; Rausch & Tiner, 1949; region. Rausch (952) reported Paranoplocephala infrequens (Douthitt, 1915) and Paranoplocephala horealis (Douthitt, 1915) as parasites of the meadow

* Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Center, PO Box 1H vole in Alaska, but these taxa are presently assigned (jokiniemenkllja lJ, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland. to Anoplocephaloides Baer, 1923 as A. troeschi (Rausch, **University of Washington School of Medicine, Depa11ment of Com­ 1946) and A. variahilis (Douthitt, 1915) respectively parative Medicine, Box 357190, Seattle, WA 98195-7190, USA. (Rausch, 1946, 1952). Correspondence: Voitto IIaukisalmi. Tel.: +358-9-H57 05 439 - Fax: +358-9-H57 05 531. Our investigations on anoplocephalid cestodes of E-mail: voitto.halikisalmi@metlaJi Alaska have revealed two species of Paranoploce-

Parasite, 2002, 9, 305-3]4 -- ---~ ------._-~- 305 Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

Cestode species Host genus Distribution SC NE UT VA TE 1 TE 2 CI AL

P. altemala Hallkisalmi, WickstrCim, lIantula & HenUonen, 2001 Diclnsloll)'X Holarctic S L C L AAA C L F P. apodemi (Iwaki, Tenora, Abe, Oku & Kamiya, 1991+)' Apodemlls Palearctic S S P I. AA N L li P. aqllatica Cenov, Vasileva & Georgiev, 1996 Amicola, Ondatra Palearctic S I. C L AAA C L F P. arctica (Rausch, 1952); see also Haukisalmi et aI., 2001 Dicrosloll)'x Nearctic S I. C L AA C L U P. hairdi (Schad, 1954); see also lIaukisalmi & Henttonen, 2000 PbellaCOm)'s Nearctic S I. P L A c: L L P hlcmchardi L'vloniez, 1891) sensu Tenora et ai, 1985" lVIicrotus Palearctic S S C S A C L U P. etholeni n. sp. Microtus Nearctic S S C S AA N SF P. j,*llmani Haukisalmi & Henttonen, 2001 LenlnlllS Holarctic S I. S L AA C L U P. Ieodoroui (Gulyaev & Chechulin, 1996) Amicola. iV!icmtus Palearctic S S P I. A N I. F P. genoui Cubanyi, Tenora & Mural, 1998* Ondalra Palearctic S I. I. AAA C S U P. gracilis Tenora & Murai, 1980" Micmtlls, CletbriOllOll1)'S Palearctic S I. P I. AAA. C I. U P. janickii Tenora, Mural & Vaucher, 1985' Micmtus Palearctic S I. P S AA c: I. ]' P kale/ai (Tenora, Haukisalmi & Henttonen, 1985)* CletbriollOmys Palearctic S L P I. AA N I. F P kirhyi Voge, 1948 Microtus i\earctic I. L P I. A C I. F P. krebsi Hauklsalmi. Wickstrc;m, Bantula & Henttonen, 2001 Dicrostoll)'X i\earctic SS P L A C I. U P. 100zgiuaginata Chechulin & Gulyaev, 1998' Cletbr!oIlOlll)'S Palearctic S L C L AAA N I. F P. macrocephcz!a (Douthitt, 1915)*; see also Genov et ai, 1996 Jlicrotus, Geomys :\earctic I. L P L AA N L F P. maser! Tenora, Gubanyi & Murai, 1999* LernnziscliS Kearctic L I. P L A N L U P. micmti (Bansen, 1947)* Jlicrotus i\earctic L I. P r. A c: r. F 1'. montana (Kirschenblat, 1941) Micmtlls, Palearctic S I. I. AA c: I. C P. neolomae (Voge, 1946) Neotoma :\earctic S I. I. AAA N L F P. ne{!oi Fair, Schmidt & Wertheim, 1990 Spalax Palearctic S L .AAA C S ]J P. nordensk,ioeldi Haukisalmi, Wickstrhm, Hantula & Henttonen, 200] fJicrosto I IYX Iiolarctic S L P L AA C L U P. omphalodes (Hermann, 178.3)*; see Tenora & Murai, 1980 Microtus llolaretic I. L P L AC L F P. ondatrae (Rausch, 1948): see also Genov et aI., 1996 Ondatra :\earctic S L C S AAA C SF 1'. primordialis (Douthitt, 1915); see also Haukisalmi & Henttonen, 2001 Microtus, Tamiasciurus I\earctic S L S L AA C L U P rallschi (F:1ir, Schmidt & Wertheim, 1990) Microtus Palearctic I. L L A N L F P scillri (Rausch, 1947); see also Genov et al., 1996 Glaucomys Nearctic S L L AAA C S I.' P. serrata Haukisalmi & Henttonen, 2000 DiclnslollYX Iiolarctic S L P L A/AA C I. C

* The existing (rc)descriptions have been supplemented with personal observations, concerning mostly the development of uterus, on type specimens or other available material.

Notes: P. hialoll'iezensis (Soltys, 1949), P. campestris (Cholodkovsky, 1912) and P. communis (Douthitt. 1915) are treated as species illqllirendae, P. trallsilicida (Douthitt, 1915) as a synonym of 1'. macrocepha!a, and P. callcasica (Kirschenblat, 19:38) as a synonym of 1'. olllpha!odes. According to our unpublished observations, 1'. mascolllai'vlmai, 1'enora & Rocarnora, 1980 (host j);ficrotlls cabreraI') should be assigned to the genus Anop!ocephaloides because of its tube-like early uterus (see also Genov & Georgiev. 1988).

-c: Table L - Paralloplocephala spp. in Holartic rodents, with data on host genera, geographical distribution and main morphological features of cestodes. SC:, morphology of scolex and suc­ ~ tJ kers: S, scolex small, suckers embedded in scolex; L, scolex large, suckers protruding, bowl-shaped. NE, dimensions of neck: L, long and thin (relative to scolex); S, short and wide (relative ~. (D to scolex). UT, structure of early uterus: C, completely reticulated ( e.g. P. allernata: Haukisalmi et al., 2001a): P, partly reticulated (e.g. P. olllphalodes: Rausch, 1976); S, sparsely reticulated

N (e.g. P./ellmalli: lIaukisalmi 1'1 aI., 200Ib). VA, length of vagina relative to the length of the cirrus sac: L long (:::, 60 0/r,); S, short « 60 %). TE 1, overall distribution of testes: A, antiporally o o N to ovary; AA, antiporally and anteriorly to ovary: AAA, antiporally, anteriorly and antero-porally to ovary TE 2, antiporal distribution of testes: C, crossing antiporal ventral osmoregulatory canal; 1\', not crossing antiporal ventral canal. CI, length and position of cirrus sac: I., long, overlapping or crossing poral ventral osmoregulatory canal; S, short, not overlapping poral ventral :8 6 osmoregulatory canal. AI., alternation of genital pores: F, frequently (and irregularly) alternating; l;, unilateral or infrequently alternating. Character states corresponding to those in F'. etholelli v' n. sp. have been indicated in bold. Uo 1 '" Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

DESCRIPTION OF PARANOPLOCEPHALA ETHOLENI N. SP. (CESTODA: ANOPLOCEPHALIDAE) IN THE MEADOW VOLE MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS, WITH A SYNOPSIS OF PARANOPLOCEPHALA S. L. IN HOLARCTIC RODENTS

HAUKISALMI V.*, HENTT01'\EN H.*, NIEMIMAA J* & RACSCH RL**

Summary: Resume: DFSCRII'TION DI: PARAN()I'IDCEPfiAIA U7[()LbVI ~. SP. (CESTODA: ANOPLOCEPHALIDAF) CHEZ LE CAMI'AGKOI DES PRAIRIES Paranoplocephalo etholeni n. sp, parasitizing the meadow vole {ll/(J~()7'l'S Fe...V,.\-S} L l'A,VIC(iS. ;\\'EC t-\l S'{t'\OPSIS DE P.4RAiVOFLOCfTH/llA Microtus pennsylvanicus in Alaska and Wisconsin, USA, is ,. L. ClIF!. IES RONGElII(S H01.ARC'['IQlIES described Paranoplocephala etholeni is morphologically most Nous deerivons Paranoplocephala etholeni n. sp., parasite du closely related to the Nearctic Paranoplocephala ondatrae Campagnol des Prairies Microtus pennsylvanicus en Alaska et (Rausch, 1948) Available data suggest that P etholeni is a host­ Wisconsin. Paranoplocephala etholeni est morphologiquement Ie specific, locally rare species that may have a wide but sporadic plus proche de I'espece nearctique Paranoplocephala ondatrae geographical distribution in North America. The finding of (Rausch, 1948) Les donnees disponibles suggerent que P ondatrae-like cestodes in Microtus spp suggests that this poorly P etholeni est une espece dont I'hote est specifique et localement known species may actually be a palasite of voles rather than rare, mais neanmoins avec une aire de repartition large et (type host) A tabular synopsis of all the known speCies of sporadique en Amerique du Nord La decouverte de cestodes du Paranoplocephala s. I in the Holarctic region with their main Iype P. ondatrae dans des especes de campagnols Microtus spp morphological features is presented suggerent que cette espece peu connue est en fait une espece KEY WORDS: Par':Jncp!ace['lhot'aethoieni n. sp., l-'oreJno.o!oe:ept'1Oto ondatroe. parasite des campagno/s, plutot que du rat musque (decrit comme Cestoda, Microtus hote Iype) Un synopsis sous forme de tableau de toutes les pellnsy!vonicus, especes de Paranoplocephala s. I de 10 region holarctique avec leurs principales coracterisliques morphologiques est donne

MOTS CLfS : Poranclplc'Cef)holo etholenl n sp., Paronoplocepholo ondotroe, Cestoda, Anoplocepha!lnoe, Microtus pennsylvanicus,

INTRODUCTION Rausch & Schiller, 1949; Rausch, 1952; Kuns & Rausch, 1950; Lubinsky, 1957; Kinsella, 1967; Whitaker & Adalis, noplocephaline cestodes representing the genus 1971). Paranoplocephala macrocephala (Douthitt, Paranoplocephala LLihe, 1910 s. 1. are ubiqui­ 1915) and Paranoplocephala primordialis (Douthitt, ous parasites of voles and lemmings (Arvico­ 1915) (both originally assigned to Andrya) have fre­ linae) (e.g. Rausch, 1976; Tenora el al., 1985; Hauki­ quently been reported as parasites of M. penn~ylua­ salmi el al., 2001). At least 27 species are known from nicus. However, the concept of P. macrocephala has Holarctic rodents, 10 of which parasitize primarily been very broad, and it is probable that other species voles of the genus Microlus Schrank (Table I; see also of Paranoplocephala have also been reported under Tenora et al., 1986). Only one of these, Paranoploce­ this name (Rausch, 1976). The taxonomy of P. pri­ phala omphalodes (Hermann, 1783), is known to have mordialis is equally unsettled (Rausch, 1952; Hauki­ a Holarctic distribution (Rausch, 1976). salmi & Henttonen, 2001). The meadow vole, Microlus penrzsylva nicus (Ord), has Although the range of the meadow vole covers a a vast geographical distribution in North America, and considerable part of Alaska, there are no records of it has been subject to several helminthological inves­ Pamnoplocephala in M. penm:vlvanicus from that tigations (e.g. Erickson, 1938; Rausch & Tiner, 1949; region. Rausch (1952) reported Pamnoplocephala il~lrequens (Douthitt, 1915) and Pamnoplocephala horealis (Douthitt, 1915) as parasites of the meadow

* Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Center, PO Box 18 vole in Alaska, but these taxa are presently assigned (jokiniemenkuja 1), FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland. to Anoplocephaloides Baer, 1923 as A. lroeschi (Rausch, **University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Com­ 1946) and A. variahilis (Douthitt, 1915) respectively parative Medicine, Box 357190, Seattle, \VA 9R195-7190, USA. (Rausch, 1946, 1952). Correspondence: Voitto I [aukisalmi. Tel.: +358-9-857 05 439 - Fax: +358-9-857 05 531. Our investigations on anoplocephalid cestodes of E-mail: voitto.haukisalmi@metlaJi Alaska have revealed two species of Paranoploce-

Parasite, 2002, 9, 305-314 ._--- --·---305 Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

pennsvluanicus, collected from Bonanza Creek Flat in glottides. Scolex not clearly distinct from neck. Suckers Alaska, USA, by H. Henttonen, J. Laakkonen and J. Nie­ small, spherical, directed laterally or antero-laterally, mimaa, on 4th August 2000. embedded in scolex. Neck short and thick, minimum Paratypes: colI. nos. 91875 and 91876, other data same width ca. 60 % (32-89 %) of scolex width, attained at as in the holotype. 0.20-0.47 (mean 0.38) from posterior margin of suckers. Etymology: The name of the new species refers to Longitudinal muscle bundles form two separate layers Alvid Adolf Etholen, a Finn who setved as a chief in mature proglottides. manager of Alaska during 1840-1845. Etholen was a Proglottides craspedote. Length/width ratio of pro­ keen collector of ethnographic artifacts of Aleutians and glottides fairly constant in immature, mature and post­ other native inhabitants of western Alaska. His renow­ mature proglottides (mean 0.19-0.20), but markeclly ned collections are deposited in the Finnish National higher in gravid proglottides (mean 0.40). Genital Museum. pores opening in middle of proglottis margin or slightly posteriad. Genital pores frequently and irregularly DESCRIPTION (Figs. 1-3, Table II) alternating with 6.5-13.5 (mean 9.8) changes per 100 Strobila ca. 100 in length, relatively wide and robust. proglotticles. Average length of unilateral series 7.4-15.5 Maximum width attained in pregravid or gravid pro- (overall range 1-46) proglottides.

A B

Fig. I. - Paranoplocephala etholelli n. sp. in i'vlicrotus pemzsylvcmicus from Alaska, USA. A, B, scolex and neck (scale bar: 0.30 mm). C, mature proglottis (scale bar: 0.50 mm1. D, transverse section of mature proglottis (scale bar: 0.50 mm).

c

o

Parasite, 2002, 9, 305-314 308--- -'------Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

Ventral longitudinal osmoregulatory canals thin, 0.02­ margin of vitellarium. Testes may overlap ovary slightly, 0.10 (mean 0.06) at middle of proglottis; longitudinal but do not usually reach margin of vitellarium. Testes canals connected by thin transverse canals. Dorsal in 2-4 dorso-ventral layers in antiporal part of pro­ longitudinal osmoregulatory canals 0.013-0.032 (mean glottis; 1-2 layer(s) of testes overlap(s) ovary. Diame­ 0.019) in width, lateral to ventral canals. Genital ducts ter of testes 0.07-0.10. passing dorsally across longitudinal osmoregulatory Cirrus sac pyriform, relatively short, 10-17 % (mean canals. 13 %) of mature proglottis width. Cirrus sac does not Testes numerous, situated mostly in antiporal part of usually overlap por;cd ventral osmoregulatory canals. proglottis. Few testes may overlap antiporal ventral Absolute length of cirrus sac increases slightly in post­ osmoregulatory canals, but usually no testes extend mature proglottides. Muscle layers of cirrus sac poorly antiporally across this canal. Position of most poral developed. Distal part of ductus cirri armed with short testes varies from level of mid-vitellarium to por;cd spines, proximal part usually uncoiled. Length of

A

~j~•."'" / f(t

!;:: ,-::"

fig. 2. - raranoplocephala etho!eni n. sp. in il1icrotus pennsv!uallicus from Alaska, USA. B A, terminal genital ducts (scale har. 0.20 mm). 13. early-stage uterus in mature proglottis (scale bar: 0.50 mm). C, fully deve­ loped uterus in pregravid proglottis (scale har: 1.0 mm). D, egg in surface and side view. and pyriform apparatus (scale har: 0.0.30 mm)

c

D

Parasite, 2002, 9, 305-314 309 Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

internal seminal vesicle ca. half of cirrus sac length in of vagina formed by dense layer of intensely stained mature proglottides. External seminal vesicle irregularly cells. No lining observed on internal surface of vagina. looped, lying anterior or partly dorsal to seminal recep­ Seminal receptacle long, asymmetrically ampulliform, tacle. Surt~lCe of external seminal vesicle covered with distal part forming distinct neck. Proximal part of seminal layer of large cells. receptacle usually bent posteriorly. Vagina, cirrus sac Vagina tube-like organ of uniform width, lying ventrally and accessory organs persist in gravid proglottides. or postero-ventrally to cirrus sac. Length of vagina ca. Vitellarium and ovary poral, vitellarium and Mehlis' half of cirms sac length (41-73 %, mean 56 °Al). Walls gland lying middle of and dorsally to ovary. Width of

:.:" -', . : ; eg. .

A B

Fig. :\. - Paranoplocephala etholeni n. sp. in }vlicmtus penmyl/laniclls from \Visconsin. liSA. A. scolex and neek (scale har: 0.:\0 rnm). B. mature proglottis Iscale bar: 0.50 mm).

P. ondatrae (Rausch, 194H) P. etboleni n. sp. P. etboleni n. sp. Source: Genov el al. 1996 Alaska In ~ 1.3) Wisconsin (n ~ 2) (n ~ 1) Host: Micmllls penmyl/lanicus Host: At. pemzsvluaniclls Host: Ondalra zihethiclls

Characters Range ,'vlean I{ange Mean Range Mean

Body length 71-124 1007 12 91 122 Number of proglottides 151-196 179.0 12 569 Maximum width 2.H:\A.95 :\HI 1:\ 4.0H 258 Scolex. diameter 0.50-0.69 0597 11 055-0.72 0.625 2 0.665 Suckers, diameter 021-025 0.222 /11 0.21-027 025H H 0.257-0.250 0246 Neck, length (}20-055 0551 10 OAO 1 0.70 '"1 :'\eck. width O.3H-O.67 O.50H 11 OAH-O.5:\ 0.505 2 0.24 1 Testes. total number 5:\-79 66.9 2H 62-H4 HO 5 80-95 86 15 Cirrus sac, length 017-0.52 0.256 52 022-0.56 029H 5 O.21O-0.22H 0.221 12 Cirrus sac. width 007-0.1.3 1l.()96 52 Om-IJ.l5 0095 5 0.113-0.125 0.117 12 Cirrus sac, InaxirllUlll length" 0.29-040 0.)55 1:\ 0.51-0,)6 0555 5 Ovary. width 0.50-1.06 0.751 52 050-0.HO 0696 5 Ovary. length 0.29-0.46 0564 :\2 0.5.3-0.52 0.408 5 Vitellarium. wiclth 02HJ.52 0544 52 052-0.59 0.547 5 Vitellariurn. length 0.12-0.19 0151 52 0.14-0.1 0156 5 Index of asymmetry 056-0049 0.424 51 059-045 0.407 5 0.46-0.50 OA8 12 Vagina. length O.II-O.IH 0.145 .32 0.l.)-O.18 015.) 5 0.045-0.058 0.051 12 Vagina. rnaXinlUI11 width 0.052-0.060 0.046 52 00.30-0.040 1}058 5 0040-0049 0045 12 Vagina/cirrus sac ratio OAI-O.75 0565 52 0.4H-059 0519 5 0.20-0.26 025 12 Seminal recepwcle, length 0.50-110 0.540 52 0.51-0A2 0565 2 0.626-069.3 0.669 ]() Seminal receptacle. width O.IHJ24 o 157 52 0.10-0.12 O.lOH 2 0112-0.215 OH3 10 Seminal recepwcle, m'lx. length" 0.57-1.25 0.H70 13 055 1 Egg, length 54-46 41.) 55 58-42 39.7 8 54-58 56 15 Egg. width .)O-.3H 55.4 J.) 55-59 5H6 H

;1 PostnuTUfC proglottides.

Table II. - Main morphometric features of Paranoplocephala elholen! n. sp. ,md P. one/atrae (Rausch, 194H). All measurements are in mil­ limeters except for the egg dimensions which are in micrometers. n, number of specimens. :'\, number of measurements.

Parasite. 2002. 9, 505-314 Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

ovary ca. 1/3 of mature proglottis width. Vitellarium 1972), P. gundii (Joyeux, 1923), and P. octodensis (Babero may overlap slightly seminal receptacle. & Cattan, 1975). Uterus appears in premature proglottides as dense, According to Table T, P. etholeni is morphologically dis­ dorso-ventrally thin reticulum formed by fine threads, tinct from all other species of Paranoplocephala. There lying ventral to other organs and extending across lon­ is only one species, P. ondatrae, that shares five fea­ gitudinal osmoregulatory canals bilaterally. Antiporal tures and five species, Paranoplocephala apodemi part of early uterus usually extends more posteriad than (Iwaki, Tenora, Abe, Oku & Kamiya, 1994), Parano­ poral part. Lateral margins of reticulum not distinct. In plocephala blanchardi (Moniez, 1891), Paranoploce­ late mature proglottides, lumen rapidly appears and phala feodorovi (Gulyaev & Chechulin, 1996), Para­ marginal sacculations and internal trabeculae are noplocephala kalelai (Tenora, Haukisalmi & Henttonen, formed within uterus, first in lateral parts of uterus. At 1985) and P. longivaginata Chechulin & Gulyaev, this stage, vitellarium and ovary disappear simulta­ 1998, that share four features with P. etholeni (Table 0. neously, but testes remain, overlapping developing The other species of Paranoplocephala parasitizing uterus in early postmature proglottides. Fully deve­ Microlus spp. in North America, Paranoplocephala loped uterus (pregravid proglottides) with anterior, microti (Hansen, 1947), Paranoplocephala kirhyiVoge, posterior and lateral sacculations, and complex system 1948, P.macrocephala, P. omphalodes and P. primor­ of anastomosing internal trabeculae, but no fenestra­ dialis, are morphologically unrelated to P. etholeni, sha­ tions. All internal structures of uterus usually disappear ring only 1-2 features with it. in fully gravid proglottides. The most similar species, P. ondatrae, was described Eggs spherical in surface view, ovoid in side view. by Rausch (948) based on a single specimen from Length of pyriform apparatus 0.025-0.030, width 0.013­ muskrat Ondatra zihethicus (Linnaeus) from Ohio, 0.015. Horn of pyriform apparatus may be partially USA. Rausch & Schiller (949) later synonymized divided; tip of horn(s) armed with bunch of fine hairs. P. ondalrae with P. macrocephala, a common para­ Length of oncospheral hooks ca. 0.005. site of Geomys Rafinesque and /vficrotus in North Ame­ rica, but the reck:scriptions of Genov et al. (996) show that these two species are separate. Following DISCUSSION the original description, P. ondatrae has not been reported from North America, but Tenora & Murai (980) described it from muskrat from Hungary and INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION the former Czechoslovakia. However, these specimens ..orphological and morphometric data show were later identitled as Paranoplocephala aquatica Genov, Vasileva & Georgiev, 1996 (Genov etal., 1996) I convincingly that the specimens of P. etholeni and finally described as Paranoplocephala genovi .. from Alaska and Wisconsin are conspecific; i &. Gub{lllyi, Tenora Murai, 1998 (Gub{lllyi el aI., 1998). they agree well in most qualitative and quantitative fea­ The detailed redescription of the holotype of P. onda­ tures (Figs 1-3, Table II). We could find only a single trae by Genov el al. 0996 ) shows that its early-stage consistent difference between these populations, i.e. uterus is similar to that of P. etholeni (dense reticulum the cirrus sac of the specimens from Wisconsin seems covering most of the medulla). The structure of the to be slightly longer, and therefore overlaps the poral (early) uterus has been a key characteristic in the clas­ ventral osmoregulatory canals more than the cirrus sac sification of anoplocephaline cestodes (Beveridge, of the specimens from the type locality. However, 1994), and the similarity of this complex structure in considering the high overall similarity and small sample P. etholeni and P. ondatrae suggests a close (phylo­ size for Wisconsin population, this deviation can not genetic) relationship. Other morphological similarities be given significant taxonomic weight. between P. etholeni and P. ondatrae include the struc­ ture and dimensions of the scolex, cirrus sac and DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS vagina (~f Fig. 4), and the pattern of the alternation Table I shows eight morphological features for P. etho­ of the genital pores. Of these, the shortness of the leni and other species of Paranoplocephala s. 1. in cirrus sac and vagina are of special significance, Holarctic rodents. These characters were selected because these features are rare among Paranoploce­ because they were available for most of the species, phala spp. (Table 0. However, the vagina of P. cmda­ because they usually show limited intraspecific varia­ trae is actually shorter (relative to the length of the tion, and because they have traditionally been used in cirrus sac) than that of P. etholeni (Table lI), although species-level taxonomy of anoplocephaline cestodes of both species were classified as having a short vagina. rodents. Paranoplocephala spp. occurring south of Paranoplocephala etholeni ditlers from P. ondatrae also the Holarctic Region (Africa and South America) were in the morphology of the neck and by number and excluded; these species are P. dasymidis (Hunkeler, distribution of testes. P. etholeni has a short, wide neck

Parasite, 2002, 9. 305·314 ------f------.--... ------··~311 Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

(relative to the size of the scolex), an uncommon cha­ leni there are only a few testes anterior to ovary and racteristic among Paranoplocephala spp., whereas they do not extend further pored than the paral margin p. ondatrae has a typical "paranoplocephaloicl" neck of vitellarium. (long and slender). Although neck dimensions can be Additionally, the shape of the seminal receptacle is markedly affected by the degree of relaxation, the dif­ unique in P. etholeni, separating it from all other spe­ ferences between the two neck types in Paranoplo­ cies of Paranoplocephala. cephala are so distinct and consistent that they must represent true interspecific variation. In P. cmdatrae, PARANOPLOCEPHALA CF. ONDATRAE FROM VOLES there is a large number of testes anterior to ovary and The specimen of P. cf ondatrae from M. pennsvlua­ the poral testes reach the poral ventral osmoregulatory niclts from Wisconsin (Fig. 4A, C) is morphologically canal and may overlap it (eI Fig. 4), whereas in P. etho- very closely related to P. ondatrae from muskrat. For

A B

Fig. 4. - ParmlOp!ocepha!a cf. olzilalrae in kIicrolus pel/I/sv!u{micus from Wis­ consin, USA (A, C) and in /VIicrolus mOl/­ tal/us from Nevada, CSA (B. DJ. A. B. scolex and neck (scale bar: 0.30 mm). C. D. mature proglottides (scale bar: 050 mm).

c

o

Parasite. 2002. 9. 305-314 312 ------_.-- Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

example, both taxa have a similar, completely reticu­ Cook, Eric P. Hoberg and Sam R. Telford). The late early utems, small scolex, long and slender neck, Alaskan voles examined for helminths by the BCP similar overall distribution of testes (from antiporal to include ca. 200 M. pemzsylvanicus, collected from poral ventral osmoregulatory canals and identical various sites in the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Pre­ genital ducts (very short and thick vagina, short cirms serve, and large samples of iHicrotus xanthognathus sac, long seminal receptacle with narrow distal "neck" (Leach), M. miurus, lief. oeccmomus and C. rutilus from and expanded, ovoid proximal part). The slight diffe­ diverse localities in Alaska. rence in the distribution of testes (a larger proportion The finding of P. etholeni in M. pemzsylvanicus from of testes lies anterior to ovary in P. ondatrae than in Wisconsin suggests that this species may actually have P cf ondatrae), possibly reflecting host-induced varia­ a wide distribution in North America. Although P. etho­ tion, seems to be the only qualitative feature separa­ leni was evidently not found in other host species exa­ ting these taxa. These specimens also originate from mined by Rausch & Schiller (949), it remains to be the same geographical region (Ohio and Wisconsin, shown whether it is strictly specific to the meadow vole respectively). in the more southern regions where iI1icrotus-assem­ The specimen from lVf. montanusfrom Nevada (Fig. 4B, blages differ from those in Alaska. Other published D) resembles both P. ondatrae from muskrat and P. d. records of Paranoplocephala spp. from North American ondatrae from meadow vole, but differs from them by Microtus (for a review, see Timm, 1985) can not be the relative size of suckers (larger in the specimen from compared with P. etholeni, because no descriptions M. montanus) and distribution testes with respect to were presented. ovary (testes overlapping ovary more in the specimen Because several independent species of Paranoploce­ from M. montanus). phala have evidently been (mis)identified as P. macro­ The similarity of these three taxa, and especially those cephala, we examined the available samples in the US from muskrat and meadow vole, suggests that they are National Parasite Collection from /vlicrotus spp., label­ either conspecific or closely related (sister) taxa. It is led as "Paranoplocephala macrocephala" (lJSNPC therefore possible that lvIicrotus-voles are the natural 84515) or "Andrya macrocephala" (USNPC 44447, definitive hosts for P. ondatrae, instead of muskrat, 44655), but none of these represented P. etholeni. which would explain the extreme rarity of P onda­ To sununarize the available pieces of infonnation, P. etho­ trae in the type host (cl Rausch, 1948). However, leni is a host-specific, locally rare species that may have because there are no data for morphological and mor­ a wide but sporadic geographical distribution in North phometric variation within these taxa, definitive condu­ America. siems about their conspecificity would be premature. Further taxonomic research on the P. ondatrae-com­ plex based on more representative samples is clearly ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS warranted. ur ongoing research on anoplocephalid ces­ todes of rodents in the Holarctic region has HOST AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION been funded by the Academy of Finland OF PARANOPLOCEPHALA E1HOLENJ (Research Council for the Environment and Natural The existing data suggest that P. etholeni is a specific Resources; project no. 40813). The present material has parasite of M. penmylvanicus, at least in Alaska. We been collected partly in the connection of the "Berin­ have previously examined large samples of Microtus gian Coevolution Project" (BCP), funded by the NSF miurus Osgood and M. oeconomus (Pallas) from the (DBI-9972154). We would like to thank all the mem­ northern Alaska (Haukisalmi et aI., 1995), and lJicros­ bers of the various BCP crews for their efforts, and the tonyx spp. (Haukisalmi et al., 2001) and Lemmus spp. BCP project leaders Joseph A. Cook, Eric P. Hoberg (Haukisalmi & Henttonen, 2001) from Arctic Siberia and Sam R. Telford for allowing us to examine ces­ and North America without finding any cestodes tode materials collected by the BCP. Gordon H. Jar­ resembling the new species. Paranoplocephala etho­ rell and the University of Alaska Museum provided leni was also absent in the 48 Clethrionomys rutilus excellent facilities for laboratory and field work during (Pallas), five M. oeconomus and 12 Synaptomys our expeditions in Alaska. We also appreciate the horealis (Richardson) originating from the type loca­ help by Juha Laakkonen and John D. Boone in the col­ lity of the new species (southwest of Fairbanks; Hau­ lection of voles and their cestodes. Ralph L. Lichten­ kisalmi & Henttonen, unpubl.). In addition, we have fels, Eric P. Hoberg, Patricia Pilitt ( National not found P. etholeni among anoplocephalid cestodes Parasite Collection), Scott L. Gardner and Skip Sterner of voles collected in connection of the Beringian Coe­ (Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology) kindly volution Project (BCP), organized by the University of lent cestode specimens for examination. Nigel Yoccoz Alaska Museum, Fairbanks (project leaders: Joseph translated the summary in French.

9, 505-314 ·----313 Haukisalmi, Henttonen, Niemimaa & Rausch in PARASITE (Paris, France) (December 2002) 9(4). Copyright 2002, PRINCEPS Editions. Used by permission.

REFERENCES Transactions olthe American i]:[icroscopical Society, 1946, 65, 354-356.

BEVERIDGE I. Family Anoploce:phalidae Cholodkovsky, 1902, RAUSCH R Notes on cestodes of the genus Andrya Railliet, in: Ke:ys to the Cestode Parasit<::s of Ve:rtebrates. Khalil L.F., 1883, with the description of A. ondatrae n. sp. (Cestoda: Jones A. & Bray RA. (eds), CAB Inte:rnational, Cambridge, Anoplocephalidae). Transactions of the American Micro­ 1994,315-366 scopical Society, 1948, 67, 187-191. ERICKSO'l A.B. Parasites of some Minnesota and RAI!SCH RL. Studies on the hdminth fauna of Alaska. XI. Hel­ Zapodidae:, and a host catalogue of hdminth parasites of minth parasites of microtine rodents - taxonomic conside:­ native: American mice. The American /vlidland Naturalist, rations. Journal olParasitology, 1952, 38, 415-444. 1938, 20, 575-589. RAUSCH RL. The genera Paranoplocephala L(ihe, 1910 and GE'\IOV T. & Gn)RGIEV B.B. Review of the specie:s of the genus Anoplocephaloides Baer, 1923 (Cestoda: Anoplocephali­ Anoplocephaloides Bae:r, 1923 emend Rausch, 1976 (Ces­ dae), with particular rdcre:nce to species in rodents. Anna­ toda: Anoploce:phalidae) parasitiling rode:nts in Bulgaria, les de Parasitologic Humaine et Comparee, 1976, 5[, 51.'3­ with an analysis of the taxonomic structure: of the genus. 562. Parasitologica Hz mp,arica, 1988, 21, 31-52. RAl ISCI I R. & SCIIILLER E.L. A critical study of North American GE'IOV T., VASII.EVA G.P. & GEOR(~IEV 13.13. Paranoplocephala cestocies of the genus AnLh)'a with speci,d refe:rence to aquatica n. sp. (Ce:stoda, AnoplocephaJidae) from Arui­ A. macrocephala Douthitt, 1915 (Cestoda: Anoplocepha­ cola terrestris and Ondatra zibethica (Rodentia), with lidac), Journal olParasitology, 1949,35,306-314. redescriptions and comments on re:lated specie:s. Svste­ RAUSCH R & TINER JD. Studies on the parasitic helminths of malic Parasitology, 1996, 34, 135-152. the North Ce:ntral States. II. Helminths of voles (Microtus GLBA"YI A., TEl\oRA F. & MUKAI E. Parauoplocephala genoui spp.) Preliminaly report. 771e American Midland Natura­ sp. n. (Cestoda, Anoplocephalidae) li'om the muskrat (Onda­ list, 1949, 41,665-694. tra zibethica L.). Parasitologica J1ungarica, 1998, .31, 33­ TE.\IORA F. & MLRAI E. The genera Anoplocephaloides and Para­ 38. noplocephala (Cestoda) parasites of Rodentia in Europe. HAUKlsAL1VII V. & HENTJ'O'lFl\ H. Description and morphome­ Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 1980, tric variability of Paranoplocephala serrata n. sp. (Cestoda: 26, 263-284 Anoplocephalidae) in collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx TENORA F., MUHAI F:. & YAUCHER C. On some Paranoplocephala spp., ) from Arctic Siberia and North America. species (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) parasitiling rodents Svstematic Parasitology, 2000, 45, 219-231. (Rodentia) in Europe. Parasitologica }fungarica, 1985, IIAUKISALMI Y. & HINITONFN H. Biogeography of helminth 18, 29-48. parasitism in Lemmus Link (Arvicolinae), with the des­ TENORA F., MURAl E. & VAlClIFR C. On Andl)'a Railliet, 1893 cription of Paranoplocephala fellmani n. sp. (Cestoda: and Paranoplocephala Whe, 1910 (Cestoda, Monieziinae). Anoplocephalidae) from the Norwegian L. lern­ Parasitologica Hungarica, 1986, 19, 43-75. mus (Linnaeus). Svstematic Parasitology, 2001, 49, 7-22. TIMNI RM. Parasites, in: Biology of New World iHicrotus. HAUKISALMI V. & HENTTONE'! H. \Vhat is Paranoplocephala Tamarin R.H. (ecl), The American Society of Mammalogis[s, macrocephala (Douthitt, 1915) (Cestoda: Anoploce:pha­ Boston, 1985, 455-534. lidael? Svstematic Parasitology, 2003 (in press), WHITAKER J,O. & ADAus D. Trematodes and cestodes from the HAUKISALNII V., HEl\TTOI\T'I H. & BATZl.! G.O. Helminth para­ digestive tracts of S-ynaptomys cooperi and three species sitism in the voles Microtus oeconomus and lH. miurus on of Microtus from Indiana. Proceedings olthe Indiana Aca­ the North Slope of Alaska: host specificiIy and the effects demy (J/ Science, 1971, 80, 489-494. of host sex, age and breeding status. Annales Zoologici Rec,;u Ie 25 mai 2002 Femzici, 1995, 32, 193-201. Acceptc Ie 12 septembre 2002 IIAUKISALMI Y., WICKSTROM L., HA"ITU.A J & HENTI'ONEN H. Taxonomy, genetic differentiation and Holarctic biogeo­ graphy of Paranoplocephala spp. (Ce:stoda: Anoploce­ phalidae) in collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx; Arvicolinae). BiologicalJournal of the limzean Society, 2001, 74, 171­ 196. KINSEI.I.A JM. IIdminths of microtinae in western Montana. Canadian Journal olZoology, 1967, 45, 269-274. KUJ\:s M.L. & RAl'SCII R An e:cological study of helminths of some Wyoming voles (Microtus spp.) with a description of a new spe:cies of Nematospiroides (Heligmosomidae: Nematoda). Zoologica, 1950, 35, 181-188. LUBI.\ISKY G. List of helminths from Alberta rodents. Cana­ dianfoumalolZoology, 1957, 35, 623-627. RAUSCH R Paranoplocephala troeschi, new species of ce:stode from the meadow vole, Microtus p. pennsyluanicus Ord.

ParasilC, ZOOZ, 9, 305-314 314