DOCSLIB.ORG

What Can We Do? - Rail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Can We Do? - Rail SATOMORROW MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHAT CAN WE DO? - RAIL Passenger Rail Texas Passenger Rail Studies and Projects Passenger rail in Texas is typically developed at the municipal level through local support. Dallas and Houston have both successfully implemented LRT (Light Rail) systems to serve their citizens. Development beyond the municipal level requires cooperation of the regions cities, counties, MPO’s and other stakeholders. The Lone Star Rail District is an example of this regional cooperation. At the state and regional level, several rail investigations are underway in Texas including the passenger rail corridors shown in Figure 16. These studies include federal, state, regional, and private funding sources. If supported and developed, these corridors will serve Texas and the adjacent states and international ports (Mexico, Gulf seaports). Figure 16: Texas Passenger Rail Studies 6-114 WHAT CAN WE DO? The Amtrak System Pemberton Squamish Whistler Nanaimo Vancouver North Cascades Victoria Bellingham Nat. Park Port Angeles Mount Vernon Omak Glacier Olympic Nat. Park Everett Nat. Park Kettle Sandpoint Seattle Falls Libby Olympia-Lacey West GlacierBrowningCut Bank Tacoma Ephrata Centralia Coeur d’Alene Shelby Astoria Leavenworth WhitefishEssex Mt. Rainier WenatcheeMoses Lake Plummer East Glacier Havre Nat. Park Park Kelso-Longview WASHINGTON Colfax Spokane Stanley Rugby Vancouver Bingen-White Salmon Potlatch Malta Pullman Devils Lake Voyageurs MAINE Wishram Moscow Glasgow Nat. Park Isle Royale Portland Pasco Minot Grand Forks Nat. Park Lewiston Wolf Point Williston Newport Salem Hood The Pendleton Theodore Roosevelt Bangor River Nat. Park (North Unit) MINNESOTA Dalles Grangeville Houghton Montréal Albany La Grande MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA Florence Acadia Theodore Roosevelt Detroit Lakes Duluth Sault Ste. Marie St. Albans Fargo Marquette Berlin Nat. Park Eugene-Springfield Redmond Nat. Park (South Unit) Bend Baker McCall Burlington-EssexLittleton Junction Coos Bay City St. Ignace Staples Hinckley Escanaba Plattsburgh Grants Crater Lake WISCONSIN Mackinaw City Portland Nat. Park Vale White River Junction Pass Burns Ontario Lake Placid Castleton Gold Chemult IDAHO Wittenberg Westport Concord Cave Junction White St. Cloud Rutland NEW HAMPSHIRE Hill City Traverse City Brookings OREGON Boise Yellowstone HudsonMenomonieChippewaAbbotsford Falls NEW YORK Nampa Nat. Park Shawano VERMONT Smith River Medford Green Bay MICHIGAN Schenectady Crescent City St. Paul- Toronto Klamath Falls SOUTH DAKOTA Minneapolis StanleyWausau Niagara Rochester Springfield Boston Redwood Grand Teton Eau Claire Falls Albany- Bay City Syracuse MASSACHUSETTS McKinleyville Nat. Park Nat. Park Wind Cave Fond Sheboygan Aldershot Rensselaer Twin Falls Nat. Park Red Wing Saginaw Port Providence Eureka du Lac Owosso Huron Hartford Dunsmuir Badlands Winona Grand Rapids Flint Buffalo Nat. Park Wisconsin Dells East RHODE ISLAND Redding Lassen Volcanic WYOMING Milwaukee Lansing Pontiac New Haven New London Nat. Park Madison Winnemucca Jamestown CONNECTICUT Kalamazoo Detroit Erie Elko Willits Chico Rockford Battle PENNSYLVANIA New York Ogden IOWA Creek Cleveland Reno Chicago NEW JERSEY Sparks Altoona Trenton Auburn NEBRASKA Mount Pleasant Davenport South Bend Toledo Cuyahoga Valley HarrisburgLancaster Salt Lake City Nat. Park Philadelphia Sacramento Hammond-Whiting Stateline Omaha Wilmington N.J. Transit NEVADA Provo CrestonOsceola Ottumwa Pittsburgh Oakland/Emeryville Rocky Mtn. Galesburg Baltimore Atlantic City South Lake Tahoe Nat. Park Lincoln INDIANA Martinez Burlington OHIO San Francisco Helper Granby Fort Morgan Holdrege Bloomington-Normal Cumberland Kent Island/Grasonville Stockton Glenwood Fraser/Winter Park McCook Fort Madison DELAWARE Caltrain Yosemite Nat. Park Great Basin Springs Indianapolis Washington, DC Modesto I Green III I Nat. Park UTAH Hastings La Plata Shenandoah San Jose I I WEST I Champaign- Ocean City I Mammoth River Denver VIRGINIA Nat. Park Salisbury Yosemite Vail Quincy Urbana Cincinnati MARYLAND Santa Cruz Merced Valley Lakes Frisco Kansas Charlottesville Arches Nat. Park Grand Springfield Mattoon Lorton (Auto Train® Terminal) Salinas Kings Canyon COLORADO City ILLINOIS Carmel-Monterey Nat. Park Junction Colorado Springs Clifton Capitol Reef Black Canyon Topeka Richmond Fresno Nat. Park Independence Forge of the Gunnison KANSAS St. Louis Williamsburg Hanford Death Valley Canyonlands Nat. Park Visalia Zion Nat. Park Pueblo Ashland Petersburg Newport News Sequoia Nat. Park St. George Nat. Bryce Canyon Lawrence Centralia Louisville Charleston Lynchburg Lamar VIRGINIA Virginia Beach Nat. Park Park Nat. Park Mesa Verde Garden City Hutchinson Lees Summit Sedalia Hermann Norfolk CALIFORNIA Nat. Park Great Sand Warrensburg Washington Carbondale San Luis Obispo Dunes La Junta Newton Jefferson City KENTUCKY Santa Las Vegas Grand Canyon Kirkwood Danville Bakersfield Nat. Park Nat. Park Dodge Discussions have explored the concept Guadalupe Maria Mammoth Cave City Greensboro Burlington Mojave Grand Canyon Trinidad MISSOURI Nat. Park Durham Rocky Mount Solvang Winston-Salem Raleigh Raton Wilson Barstow Poplar Bluff Fulton High Santa Barbara Laughlin Salisbury Cary Victorville Williams Junction Great Smoky Mtns. Kannapolis Point Selma Channel Islands Nat. Park Kingman Flagstaff Gallup Nat. Park Southern Pines Oxnard N.M. Railrunner Santa Fe Walnut Ridge TENNESSEE Gastonia San Bernardino Newbern-Dyersburg Hamlet Fayetteville of a High Speed Rail (HSR) passenger Los Angeles Winslow OKLAHOMA Spartanburg Needles Williams Las Vegas RiversidePalm Springs Lamy Greenville Charlotte NORTH CAROLINA Anaheim Sedona Petrified Forest Oklahoma City ARKANSAS Joshua Tree Camp Verde Nat. Park Clemson Dillon Nat. Park Albuquerque Norman Camden Hemet Florence Oceanside Indio ARIZONA Memphis Gainesville Toccoa Columbia Purcell Pauls Valley Little Rock San Diego Phoenix Kingstree NEW MEXICO Hot Springs Congaree network connecting San Antonio with Yuma Nat. Park Nat. Park Maricopa Ardmore Malvern MISSISSIPPI Anniston Atlanta Denmark SOUTH CAROLINA Arkadelphia Charleston Birmingham Gainesville Hope Greenwood Yemassee Tucson GEORGIA Lordsburg Texarkana Tuscaloosa Saguaro Deming Carlsbad Caverns Dallas Marshall Savannah the DFW Metroplex and Houston. Such Nat. Park Fort Worth Yazoo City Nat. Park ALABAMA Benson Shreveport Jesup El Paso Cleburne Jackson Meridian TEXAS Mineola Guadalupe Mts. Longview LOUISIANA Hazlehurst Nat. Park Nacogdoches Brookhaven Laurel Killeen McGregor Hattiesburg Atmore Chipley Jacksonville a network, if supported by regional Fort Hood McComb Crestview Madison Lake Mobile Suspend City Temple Slidell Service ed Amtrak® Train Routes Alpine Hammond Picayune Lake Pensacola Waldo PalatkaDeLand Charles Baton Rouge Other Rail Services Sanderson Austin Taylor Pascagoula Tallahassee Gainesville Daytona Beach Biloxi Ocala Thruway Connecting Services San Marcos Sanford (Auto Train® Terminal) Big Bend Houston Beaumont Lafayette New Gulfport agencies, can form the statewide Nat. Park Del Rio Wildwood Winter Park La Marque Orleans Bay St. Louis Walt Disney World® Depending on route, connecting services New Iberia Orlando may be provided by train, bus, van, San Antonio Schriever Dade City Galveston Lakeland Kissimmee taxi or ferry. Separate fares and reservations Tampa Winter Haven St. Petersburg-Clearwater may be required on other carriers. Okeechobee Bradenton Sebring infrastructure for safe, reliable mobility Sarasota West Palm Beach Due to space limitations, not all stops are shown. Port Charlotte Delray Beach Services are subject to change. FLORIDA Deerfield Beach Amtrak System Map Effective February 2011 Figure 17: Amtrak System Map Fort Myers Fort Lauderdale Hollywood Miami choices; driving economies, and Everglades Biscayne https://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/631/638/SystemMapMar2015.pdfNat. Park Nat. Park Dry Tortugas sustained development. Nat. Park San Antonio sits at a crossroads of two Two Amtrak lines currently run through long distance passenger rail lines operated Amtrak Passenger Rail Service San Antonio. Both operate on existing by Amtrak (see Amtrak below) and a Amtrak operates a nationwide rail freight rail lines as long distance service freight crossroads connecting Mexico network, serving more than 500 (neither line provides local service). The with the United States by rail. Monterrey, destinations in 46 states, the District of Sunset Limited runs from New Orleans Mexico has been discussed as a future Columbia and three Canadian provinces to Los Angeles, and the Texas Eagle runs high speed rail (HSR) passenger terminal (see Figure 17). Service is provided on from Chicago to San Antonio. Both lines for travel into Texas (currently there more than 21,300 miles of routes. During arrive and depart at Sunset Station on the are many long haul buses from Mexico FY 2015 (October 2014 - September east side of downtown San Antonio. traveling to, and through, San Antonio). 2015), Amtrak recorded more than 30.8 The IH-10 East corridor from San Antonio million passengers, representing the to Houston is a likely candidate for HSR fifth straight year in which ridership has development and would likely connect exceeded 30 million. On an average day, with the planned Texas Central Railway more than 84,600 passengers ride more HSR between Houston and Dallas. than 300 Amtrak trains. 6-115 SATOMORROW MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Proposed Lone Star Rail (LSTAR) The Sunset Limited currently has “Amtrak’s growth over the past ten Commuter Service westbound departures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Planning Documentation
    Project Planning Documentation Overview of Project Project funding will be used to complete necessary preliminary engineering and NEPA for a new 250 mile high-speed core express service between Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston. Based on the preliminary planning summarized in this document, the Dallas-Fort Worth to Houston route could utilize one of three routes analyzed, consisting of a BNSF route through Teague, a UPRR route through College Station, or a new green field route that parallels I-45. Additionally, all three of the routes include segments of the UPRR Terminal and West Belt Subdivisions in order to connect to the existing passenger rail station in downtown Houston and a small portion of the UPRR Dallas Subdivision to connect to the existing passenger rail station (Union Station) in Dallas. Purpose and Need The purpose of the Dallas/Fort Worth to Houston core express service preliminary engineering and NEPA documentation is to prepare the project for the next stage of final design and construction. The Dallas/Fort Worth to Houston corridor has been included in the Texas Rail Plan as well as a research study performed by the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), and the America 2050 report as a key corridor with need for high speed rail service. Texas Rail Plan TxDOT completed and published the Texas Rail Plan in November 2010, which included a short term and long term program for passenger rail. The Dallas to Houston corridor was included in the short term program for preliminary planning and in the long term program for further development of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Adding Passenger Service
    A Modeler’s Aid Clinic Passenger Operations Conducted By Bruce Knapp How to integrate Passenger Trains into your operating sessions or How the Santa Fe Operated Passenger Service Why Passenger Service? Period and Equipment 1830 to 1850 Revenue Wood cars - usually stage coach bodies Advertising 1850 to 1870 Show off your modeling skills Wood cars built for railroad use Introduce sleeping cars Add interest Introduce air brakes & knuckle couplers Visitors like passenger trains 1880 to 1900 Introduce dining cars You make Walthers and Rapido very happy Introduce steam heat You also make local hobby dealers happy Introduce electric lighting Introduce vestibules and diaphragms Two Typical Wood Cars Period and Equipment 1900 to 1930 steel cars become standard air conditioning introduced All-reserved “name trains” 1930 to 1970 streamlining introduced “passenger specific” color schemes common high speed steam and diesels introduced 1971 to Present Amtrak formed Types of Passenger Service Mixed Train Combine Premier Class [Named Trains] Normal Service [Named or numbered] Local Service [locomotive & cars] Local Service [single unit] Commuter Service Mail & Express Trains Mixed Train Service Fan Trip [especially steam] Famous “Name Trains” Assigned Locomotives Chief, El Capitan, Super Chief: ATSF Steam [1940’s to 1960’s] th 20 Century Limited, Ohio Limited: NYC First Class: 4-6-2, 4-6-4, 4-8-2, 4-8-4 Broadway Limited: PRR The Hummingbird: L&N Local Service: 4-4-2, 4-6-2, 4-6-4 City of Los Angeles, City of San Francisco: UP Mixed Train: 2-8-0, 4-6-0,
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas to Houston High-Speed Rail Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Dallas to Houston High-Speed Rail Final Environmental Impact Statement ERRATA AND UPDATED INFORMATION FRA has identified several statements in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) which require correction or clarification. In addition, FRA Is providing new and/or updated information from the release of the Final EIS. This updated information and/or minor corrections to language within the Final EIS, are not considered significant, and do not change the analysis or conclusions of the Final EIS. This information does not trigger the need to prepare a supplement, per the requirements of the U.S. Council on Environmental Quality National Environmental Policy Act regulations (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(1)). Page in Location/Section Final in Final EIS EIS Issue Correction or Update ES.2, Executive ES-3 Correction provided by Text is corrected as shown: Summary, TCRR on safety record and The Project includes the deployment of an electric-powered HSR system based on Central Japan Railway Description of for Tokaido Company’s Tokaido Shinkansen system. Accident statistics are not available for systems operating Project 2-1 Shinkansen HSR lines. technology comparable to the Project; however, Japan’s Tokaido Shinkansen HSR, which operates a and similar technology, has had no passenger fatalities resulting from a trainset accident, such as a derailment or collision, since the service began over 50 years ago.8, 9 The technology has a proven safety record with 2.2.1, only one three earthquake-related derailments since the service began, which resulted in no passenger Alternatives injuries. Considered, _________________ Technology 8 The only injuries and/or fatalities reported in association with the Tokaido Shinkansen HSR system was were related to another single passenger’s suicide by self-immolation on June 30, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Passenger Trains
    SOUTHERN PACIFIC PASSENGER TRAINS Dcdication 1.tt, tt/!nt tr. tr.,....,,, t.\1,:1.r., 1,',.\ll{l I'1,.. Orrhe6rcl(cndpipt^: \/r'.r" l']t tti,\ ),,n\,tt "l " ,,,.,r'-ll ..\'' !l''.\l\ tr't.; s e,R n,t 7'\lin rl,l;n'rt uri'trtrn I'ri rrt''' i i J.l {' L\rtrlror Lrb^ t|, tt! Ln \Lt.' r"n\, ]'// r 1.rP sfi " Bnct covea main: r,rl{/ /rrr. s,t ) | u 1)i n; }'t1') i I I t t nrn ) qt t $ttr l,\li.{}! t'ta t" Wirf nrr.r!rlnD..J Llu!,n!lrrrcl,)i*r!s J;r rhr I),\11!ht l.llq!l ,rt,l' ',1 1l', t.tt, ltit rll .\ll rish. ,c{1.(l /i'' n'r,,,,, ,, '| ,| h: s;".;--h R.tti" K, .tt tt: , t;lht nt|lttt, tht nr\'] tith"! Rlr.t &t 1)rrru (;r/r,d; Ilrnn SrJ'irnl srli ,t r"r,',, !rtr\,' t , rl lll'lrl r fit.iD nlI nFcr: ri 7ri7. J'a/ t.ru li;lit r\,l|lt' rh,t\'r't o l. 'lr . Bi.Lcovcr, 'r' ' \n r t Li u t' l b rt r t\, r t't' rt lnr\vl(lsr '\llr(nn nh.o.' r. nrklr..rNrtr rnrA!'ril" 'ri lh ti! n, tl,r',l i'rr " oi rtn,pl trt ,'\trnrtr nn[1ni l.' ."1,'."J .'lr', ""r' r,tt/,r ! r t j r,- r,, ,,,, t.. ,. .t .t Krl,L'run, 'll,i. ml,li..ti,", hA n,n lJ.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Steel Wheels 4Q20 Web.Pdf
    Arizona News All Aboard Arizona Todd Liebman, President For well over a hundred and rail corridor between Los Angeles-Phoenix-Tucson and even thirty years, passenger trains further east to El Paso would be an economic driver for have been a daily fixture Arizona. Arizona’s congested transportation system diminishes of life in Northern Arizona, the quality of life for Arizonans increasing air pollution, literally building communities congestion related delays, and negatively impacting the state’s like Flagstaff and Winslow, economy. Conversely, for a relatively small investment, Amtrak bringing economic activity could return to Phoenix, the Sunset Limited/Texas Eagle to the cities served along Route 66. That came to an end in could operate daily, and the Southwest Chief could return October when Amtrak reduced the Southwest Chief route to to daily service across Northern Arizona. It is often in rural three day per week service, along with all long-distance train communities, like Yuma and Winslow, where passenger rail service in the United States. This cutback is expected to create has the biggest impact. These communities have fewer public economic losses of $239 million in the first nine months to transportation options, and the train serves as a vital lifeline for the communities served from Chicago to Los Angeles. These residents and visitors alike. cuts will not help Amtrak’s bottom line and may do permanent The outlook does not have to be bleak. We can achieve our damage to ridership and the financial health of passenger rail in goals related to daily Amtrak service on routes across Arizona America, and to the communities served by rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Meeting Tues. April 5, 2016 – Interurban Railway Museum
    N ORTH T EXAS C H APTER , N ATIONAL R AILWAY H ISTORICAL S OCI ET Y N ORTH T EXAS Z EPHYR NEWSLETTER A P R I L 2016, VOLUME 2 1 , ISSUE 2 V ALLI H OSKI , NORTH TEXAS NEWS EDITOR O PINIONS EXPRESSED HEREIN MAY NOT REFLECT THE OFFICI AL POSITION OF THE N ORTH T EXAS C HAPTER OR THE N ATIONAL R AILWAY H I S T O R I C A L S OCI ET Y . A LL CONTENT RIGHTS RETAINED BY ORIGINAL AUTHOR . E VERY ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO COMPLY WITH FAIR USE AND COPYRIGHT LAW . CHAPTER MEETING ................................................................ 1 Chapter Meeting TUES . APRIL 5, 2016 – INTERURBAN RAILWAY MUSEUM ................................. 1 SPECIAL FEATURES & NEWS................................................ 1 Tues. April 5, 2016 – Interurban Railway Museum. FORTH WORTH RAILROAD SCENE – MARCH 3-4, 2016................................... 1 When 7 pm meet ’n’ greet. 7:30 pm meeting. TH 11 ANNUAL “24 HOURS @ SAGINAW ” – FRI . MAY 27-SAT . MAY 28, 2016..... 2 Where Plano Interurban Museum TRIP REPORT #3: TEXAS RAILROADING TIDBITS ............................................ 2 RAILROAD MUSEUM OF PA CELEBRATES 335 TH CHARTER ANNIVERSARY ......... 5 Program : Nikola Tesla. TRIP REPORT #4: TEXAS AT 14 MPH AND OTHER STORIES ............................. 5 Location: Interurban Railway Museum, 901 E 15th St, Plano, MTU SPONSORS RAIL EDUCATION ADVENTURE WAY UP NORTH ................... 7 TX 75074. (972) 941-2117. NRHS NEWS ................................................................................ 8 http://www.planoconservancy.org/interurban-railway- NRHS 2016 CONVENTION REGISTRATION NOW OPEN ................................... 8 museum.html NRHS PRESIDENT ’S CORNER – MARCH 2016............................................... 8 CHAPTER NEWS & VIEWS ..................................................... 9 TEXAS PASSENGER TRAINS – ALLEN PUBLIC LIBRARY , SAT . JUNE 11, 2016.... 9 JON ’S HISTORY CORNER – TER STATION , RICHARDSON TX..........................
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-86-140BR Review of Amtrak's Study of Rail Service Through
    United States General Accounting Office Briefing Report to Congressional Requesters ” April 1986 AMTRAK Review of AMTRAK’s Study of Rail Service Through Oklahoma ill1Ill11IIIll1 II 129775 035;30\ GAO/RCED-86-140BR I ’ UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548 I1F:~OtJHCt:, C~MMIJNITY, NLI FLON~JMIL, [,I Vf LOPMENT April 14, 1986 I,IVISION B-222749 To Congressional Requesters On July 23, 1985, we briefed Representative Bob Whittaker and staff from offices of interested Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri members of Congress on the results of our review of Amtrak's analysis of seven proposed passenger rail routes through Oklahoma. This briefing was in response to a May 30, 1984, request from interested members of Congress that we evaluate the methodologies Amtrak used to analyze the market potential for reinstating passenger rail service through Oklahoma. As we agreed Ft the time of the briefing, this report provides a written summary of our result;. Our work assessed whether the revenue and cost projection models and supporting data bases that Amtrak used for the Oklahoma route analyses reasonably represented actual market conditions and costs for the proposed Amtrak routes. On the basis of our review of the models and data bases, we also evaluated the supportability of Amtrak's conclusions regarding the financial and ridership Qerformance of the seven Oklahoma route options. This report is based largely on information obtained from Amtrak and on interviews with Amtrak officials directly responsi- ble for the development and operation of the revenue and cost orojection systems and data bases we evaluated. Although there were some problems with the documentation of the revenue model and its data bases that precluded us from fully applying appropriate model evaluation methods, the information did allow us to provide iqnificant observations regarding Amtrak's current methodologies or estimating revenues on proposed passenger service routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Career and Technical Education Community Education
    EDUCATION TO ACCELERATE YOUR CAREER AND ENRICH YOUR LIFE Career and Technical Education Careers. Not just jobs. SUMMER/FALL 2014 NON-CREDIT COURSE CATALOG LoneStar.edu/CE EDUCATION & TRAINING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENERGY & MANUFACTURING ARTS, AUDIO/VIDEO TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNICATION TRANSPORTATION AND MANY MORE CLASSES & PROGRAMS BUSINESS HEALTH SCIENCE STARTS Community Education ON PAGE Leisure classes that are educational, cultural and fun! 81 PLUS LOCATIONS LSC-CYFAIR LSC-KINGWOOD LSC-MONTGOMERY 9191 Barker Cypress Road 20000 Kingwood Drive 3200 College Park Drive Cypress, TX 77433-1383 Kingwood, TX 77339-3801 Conroe, TX 77384-4500 281.290.3200 • CE: 281.290.3460 281.312.1600 • CE: 281.312.1660 Local: 936.273.7000/Metro: 936.321.5161 CE: 936.273.7446 LSC-NORTH HARRIS LSC-TOMBALL LSC-UNIVERSITY PARK 2700 W.W. Thorne Drive 30555 Tomball Parkway 20515 State Highway 249 Houston, TX 77073-3499 Tomball, TX 77375-4096 (at Louetta) 281.618.5400 • CE: 281.618.5602 281.351.3300 • CE: 281.357.3676 Houston, TX 77070-2607 281.290.2600 • CE: 281.290.2601 LSC-UNIVERSITY CENTER LSC-UNIVERSITY CENTER LONE STAR COLLEGE AT MONTGOMERY AT UNIVERSITY PARK SYSTEM OFFICE 3232 College Park Drive 20515 State Highway 249 5000 Research Forest Drive The Woodlands, TX 77384-4500 (at Louetta) The Woodlands, TX 77381-4399 936.321.4500/936.273.7510 Houston, TX 77070-2607 832.813.6500 281.290.2600 CE classes are also available at LSC satellite centers. Contact and location information for centers is available starting on page 104. General Information General Welcome! Welcome to Lone Star College. We’re glad that you’ve considered us! Nationally recognized as a premier community college and leader in higher education innovation, a Lone Star College (LSC) education is first-rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Eagle-Heartland Flyer-Chicago-Los Angeles-Oklahoma City-Fort Worth-May072012
    TEXAS EAGLE® MAY 7, 2012 and HEARTLAND FLYER® Effective SM Enjoy the journey. TEXAS EAGLE® serving CHICAGO - ST. LOUIS - LITTLE ROCK DALLAS - FORT WORTH - SAN ANTONIO 1-800-USA-RAIL LOS ANGELES And intermediate stations Call HEARTLAND FLYER® serving OKLAHOMA CITY - FORT WORTH and intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form P21–175M–5/7/12 Stock #02-3675 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. TEXAS EAGLE Service on the Texas Eagle® 21/421 Train Number 22/422 R Coaches: Reservations required. As indicated As indicated in column Normal Days of Operation in column s Sleeping cars: Superliner sleeping accommodations. R s R s - Amtrak Metropolitan Lounge available in Chicago, and On Board Service a private waiting area available in St. Louis for r y l r y l Sleeping car passengers. Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up - Sleeping car passengers arriving at Los Angeles are l1 45P Daily 0 Dp Chicago, IL–Union Station (CT) ∑w- Ar l1 52P Daily welcome to occupy their accommodations until 6:30 b Madison—see back a.m. R2 40P Daily 37 Joliet, IL ∑v D12 56P Daily r Dining-Cross Country Café: Casual service offering 3 27P Daily 92 Pontiac, IL >v 11 39A Daily complete meals. y l4 04P Daily 124 Bloomington-Normal, IL ∑v- l11 08A Daily Sightseer Lounge: Sandwiches, snacks and b Davenport, Indianapolis beverages. —see back l Checked baggage at select stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Eagle-Chicago-Los Angeles-October122020
    TEXAS EAGLE® Effective October 12, 2020 serving CHICAGO - ST. LOUIS - LITTLE ROCK - DALLAS - FORT WORTH - SAN ANTONIO - LOS ANGELES and intermediate stations Amtrak.com BOOK TRAVEL, CHECK TRAIN STATUS, ACCESS YOUR ETICKET AND MORE THROUGH THE Amtrak app. 1-800-USA-RAIL Service on the Texas Eagle® 21/421 3Train Number4 22/422 R Coaches: Reservations required. As indicated As indicated in column 3Normal Days of Operation4 in column s Private rooms. For more information, visit R s r R s r Amtrak.com/rooms. 3On Board Service4 r Dining service: For more information, visit y l O y l O Amtrak.com/dining. Read Down Mile 6 Symbol 5 Read Up y Café service: For more information, visit l1 45P TuFrSu 0 Dp Chicago, IL–Union Station (CT) ∑w- Ar l1 52P WeSaMo Amtrak.com/cafe. b Janesville—see page 2 l Checked baggage at select stations. lR2 40P TuFrSu 37 Joliet, IL ∑v p lD12 56P WeSaMo O Bicycles on Amtrak: We offer a number of different 3 27P TuFrSu 92 Pontiac, IL >v 11 39A WeSaMo services to transport your bike on many routes. Each l4 04P TuFrSu 124 Bloomington-Normal, IL ∑w- l11 08A WeSaMo train has different equipment and loading procedures b Indianapolis—see page 2 that dictate what service will be offered. Reservations 4 37P TuFrSu 156 Lincoln, IL >v 10 25A WeSaMo are required and additional charges may apply. Visit 1l5 14P TuFrSu 185 Springfield, IL ∑w 1l9 55A WeSaMo Amtrak.com/bikes for all the details before you book 5 49P TuFrSu 224 Carlinville, IL >w 9 15A WeSaMo your trip.
    [Show full text]