Wandering About: Analogy, Ambiguity and Humanistic Mathematics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wandering About: Analogy, Ambiguity and Humanistic Mathematics Journal of Humanistic Mathematics Volume 3 | Issue 1 January 2013 Wandering About: Analogy, Ambiguity and Humanistic Mathematics William M. Priestley Sewanee University of the South Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm Part of the Philosophy of Language Commons, and the Rhetoric Commons Recommended Citation Priestley, W. M. "Wandering About: Analogy, Ambiguity and Humanistic Mathematics," Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, Volume 3 Issue 1 (January 2013), pages 115-135. DOI: 10.5642/ jhummath.201301.10 . Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/vol3/iss1/10 ©2013 by the authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. JHM is an open access bi-annual journal sponsored by the Claremont Center for the Mathematical Sciences and published by the Claremont Colleges Library | ISSN 2159-8118 | http://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/ The editorial staff of JHM works hard to make sure the scholarship disseminated in JHM is accurate and upholds professional ethical guidelines. However the views and opinions expressed in each published manuscript belong exclusively to the individual contributor(s). The publisher and the editors do not endorse or accept responsibility for them. See https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/policies.html for more information. Wandering About: Analogy, Ambiguity and Humanistic Mathematics W. M. Priestley University of the South, Sewanee TN 37383 [email protected] Synopsis This article concerns the relationship between mathematics and language, em- phasizing the role of analogy both as an expression of a mathematical property and as a source of productive ambiguity in mathematics. An historical discus- sion is given of the interplay between the notions of logos, litotes, and limit that has implications for our understanding and teaching of Dedekind cuts and, more generally, for a humanistic notion of the role of mathematics within liberal education. Mathematics and language have interacted in many ways over the ages. Examples range from the effect of prehistoric “counting tokens” upon written symbols to today’s strong presence of mathematics in linguistics and cryp- tography. We tend to overlook, however, the large role that ordinary rhetoric plays in this connection. Consider, for example, Mark Twain’s insight into the writer’s craft: A good word is to the best word as a lightning bug is to the lightning. (T) The statement (T) is, of course, an analogy, that is, an assertion of the form “A is to B as C is to D.” By succinctly indicating enlightening but unsuspected connections between pairs of things, the analogy has become a major rhetorical tool in the humanities. One side of an analogy is often more familiar to us, making the other side easier to comprehend. Is there something “mathematical” going on here? James Gregory [17, page 215] used an analogy to give us insight into the vitality of 17th-century mathematics: Journal of Humanistic Mathematics Vol 3, No 1, January 2013 116 Wandering About The power of all previous methods has the same ratio to that of series (G) as the glimmer of dawn to the splendor of the noonday sun. The appearance of the word ratio in Gregory’s analogy reminds us of an almost forgotten connection between mathematics and the humanities: an analogy is an assertion of the sameness of ratios—ratios being understood perhaps in a very general sense. Indeed, logos, the Greek word for the Latin ratio, is the main stem of analogia, from which our word analogy comes. Here the prefix ana- means “up” in a generalized sense, as used also in analysis (“loosening up”). Like analysis, a word whose meaning was extended from geometry to philosophy in ancient times, analogia originally applied to mathematical assertions and later to rhetorical analogies. Today the form of an analogy is often indicated in symbols by writing A : B :: C : D, where the four dots in the middle may remind us of the assertion of a “square” balance between the ratio A : B and the corresponding ratio C : D. Com- pletion of an analogy (giving three of its members and asking for the fourth) is sometimes featured in questions on intelligence tests. Putting the question in a multiple-choice setting lessens worry about existence and uniqueness of the answer. An open-ended variant of this is to take two “extremes” and ask whether there exists a “mean” between them. For example, does there exist an entity X serving as intermediary between the sciences and the humanities in the sense that SCIENCES : X :: X : HUMANITIES? (P) Beginning in the fourth century BCE the ancient Greeks exploited re- lations among the ideas behind logos, litotes, and limit that allowed them to initiate mathematical analysis without developing our numerical epsilon- delta approach. Recalling these efforts brings mathematics closer to the hu- manities, suggests possibilities for new approaches to teaching, and—as we move toward modern times—sheds new light on the old topic of Dedekind cuts and on the place of mathematics within the liberal arts today. Perhaps a solution to proposition (P) will suggest itself along the way. W. M. Priestley 117 Figure 1: Plato and Aristotle “wandering about” in Raphael’s School of Athens. See [15]. Bronze sculpture, 18” tall, by Jeanie Stephenson, in- stalled October, 2012, in Courtyard of Woods Laboratories, the University of the South, Sewanee TN. Photograph by Mary Priestley, reproduced by permission. 1. Logos In Greek mathematics, logos (plural, logoi) means ratio—“the size of one thing relative to another” according to Euclid V —but the word is more familiar outside mathematics. “In the beginning was the logos,” the phrase from the New Testament that opens the fourth gospel, contains perhaps its 118 Wandering About most famous usage, written at a time when the word already signified a wealth of related notions. Alternative English translations of logos include word, language, speech, and reason. In the fourth century BCE it was seen as a unifying principle— along with notions of harmony, rhythm, etc.—permeating the enkuklios paideia, as the Greeks referred to the distinctive education that they developed [21]. Logos still plays a unifying role in liberal education, as suggested by such En- glish derivatives as logic and analogy, and by the host of modern academic words, such as ecology, possessing the suffix -logy. Although a numerical ratio such as 154 : 49 would be identified today with the fraction 22/7, we should remember that the Greeks possessed no algebra of common fractions [20]. They would have had little inclination to add one ratio to another, although they saw clearly—see inequality (E4) below, for example—when one ratio might be said to be less than another. Indeed, as documented in [20] and described for the general reader in [9], our modern quantitative sense took a great many centuries to develop. The strength of this sense, however, may be seen in our quick identification of the rational number 22/7 with its large equivalence class, including such fractions as 154/49. Archytas, a late Pythagorean and a friend of Plato (427–347 BCE), is traditionally credited with a striking analogy asserting the sameness of two logoi whose four members constitute a large part of the liberal education developed by the Greeks: ARITHMETIC : MUSIC :: GEOMETRY : ASTRONOMY: (A) The quadrivium, as this fourfold collection of disciplines was much later named by Boethius (480–524), would eventually become an integral part of the classical liberal arts of medieval European universities. Archytas’s analogy is usually understood by reflecting that arithmetic is about num- bers “at rest” and geometry is about magnitudes “at rest”; whereas music and astronomy study the same things, respectively, but “in motion.” That is, the science of music concerns itself with the numbers underlying pitches produced by the vibrations of the strings of a lyre, while astronomy studies magnitudes revolving in the great celestial sphere. The use of the compact form (A) to represent Archytas’s analogy would not have appeared in ancient times when the Greeks wrote everything out “rhetorically,” rarely using abbreviations beyond allowing letters to stand for W. M. Priestley 119 numbers or for the vertices of a geometric figure. In contrast, a college in- structor today might breezily remark that if a plane cuts a cone parallel to one of the cone’s generators, a Cartesian coordinate system can be easily imposed upon the plane so that the curve of intersection has an equation cy = x2 for a certain constant c. Apollonius (260?–200? BCE), however, in making essentially this observation long ago, required a great many words to express virtually the same idea, calling attention to the equality of ar- eas of a certain square (of size x) and a certain rectangle (with sides c and y). Apollonius went on to note that the analogue of this equality of square and rectangle becomes an inequality in the case of the other types of conic sections. Accordingly, he gave them the names that became our familiar parabola, hyperbola, and ellipse, depending upon (as we would say today) whether the symbol =, >, or < applies. The connections between the three types of conic sections, these three modern symbols, and the familiar rhetor- ical terms parable, hyperbole, and ellipsis are noteworthy, both for seeing ties between mathematics and rhetoric and for apprehending how symbols can sometimes reveal analogies with surprising succinctness. See [18] for a more complete discussion of Apollonius’s ideas. While their mathematics became more involved, the Greeks remained reticent to use symbolism to break the ties joining mathematics and rhetoric. This is often seen as a hindrance. It is worth emphasizing that it took a very long time for abbreviative notations and their consequent large-scale algebraic manipulations to manifest themselves. They have proved to be so efficient, however, that we have all but forgotten about past struggles in mathematics between symbolists and rhetoricians; see [7, pages 426–431].
Recommended publications
  • Archimedes of Syracuse
    5 MARCH 2020 Engineering: Archimedes of Syracuse Professor Edith Hall Archimedes and Hiero II’s Syracuse Archimedes was and remains the most famous person from Syracuse, Sicily, in history. He belonged to the prosperous and sophisticated culture which the dominantly Greek population had built in the east of the island. The civilisation of the whole of ancient Sicily and South Italy was called by the Romans ‘Magna Graecia’ or ‘Great Greece’. The citis of Magna Graecia began to be annexed by the Roman Republic from 327 BCE, and most of Sicily was conquered by 272. But Syracuse, a large and magnificent kingdom, the size of Athens and a major player in the politics of the Mediterranean world throughout antiquity, succeeded in staying independent until 212. This was because its kings were allies of Rome in the face of the constant threat from Carthage. Archimedes was born into this free and vibrant port city in about 287 BCE, and as far as we know lived there all his life. When he was about twelve, the formidable Hiero II came to the throne, and there followed more than half a century of peace in the city, despite momentous power struggles going on as the Romans clashed with the Carthaginians and Greeks beyond Syracuse’s borders. Hiero encouraged arts and sciences, massively expanding the famous theatre. Archimedes’ background enabled him to fulfil his huge inborn intellectual talents to the full. His father was an astronomer named Pheidias. He was probably sent to study as a young man to Alexandria, home of the famous library, where he seems to have became close friend and correspondent of the great geographer and astonomer Eratosthenes, later to become Chief Librarian.
    [Show full text]
  • A Centennial Celebration of Two Great Scholars: Heiberg's
    A Centennial Celebration of Two Great Scholars: Heiberg’s Translation of the Lost Palimpsest of Archimedes—1907 Heath’s Publication on Euclid’s Elements—1908 Shirley B. Gray he 1998 auction of the “lost” palimp- tains four illuminated sest of Archimedes, followed by col- plates, presumably of laborative work centered at the Walters Matthew, Mark, Luke, Art Museum, the palimpsest’s newest and John. caretaker, remind Notices readers of Heiberg was emi- Tthe herculean contributions of two great classical nently qualified for scholars. Working one century ago, Johan Ludvig support from a foun- Heiberg and Sir Thomas Little Heath were busily dation. His stature as a engaged in virtually “running the table” of great scholar in the interna- mathematics bequeathed from antiquity. Only tional community was World War I and a depleted supply of manuscripts such that the University forced them to take a break. In 2008 we as math- of Oxford had awarded ematicians should honor their watershed efforts to him an honorary doc- make the cornerstones of our discipline available Johan Ludvig Heiberg. torate of literature in Photo courtesy of to even mathematically challenged readers. The Danish Royal Society. 1904. His background in languages and his pub- Heiberg lications were impressive. His first language was In 1906 the Carlsberg Foundation awarded 300 Danish but he frequently published in German. kroner to Johan Ludvig Heiberg (1854–1928), a He had publications in Latin as well as Arabic. But classical philologist at the University of Copenha- his true passion was classical Greek. In his first gen, to journey to Constantinople (present day Is- position as a schoolmaster and principal, Heiberg tanbul) to investigate a palimpsest that previously insisted that his students learn Greek and Greek had been in the library of the Metochion, i.e., the mathematics—in Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedes Palimpsest a Brief History of the Palimpsest Tracing the Manuscript from Its Creation Until Its Reappearance Foundations...The Life of Archimedes
    Archimedes Palimpsest A Brief History of the Palimpsest Tracing the manuscript from its creation until its reappearance Foundations...The Life of Archimedes Birth: About 287 BC in Syracuse, Sicily (At the time it was still an Independent Greek city-state) Death: 212 or 211 BC in Syracuse. His age is estimated to be between 75-76 at the time of death. Cause: Archimedes may have been killed by a Roman soldier who was unaware of who Archimedes was. This theory however, has no proof. However, the dates coincide with the time Syracuse was sacked by the Roman army. The Works of Archimedes Archimedes' Writings: • Balancing Planes • Quadrature of the Parabola • Sphere and Cylinder • Spiral Lines • Conoids and Spheroids • On Floating Bodies • Measurement of a Circle • The Sandreckoner • The Method of Mechanical Problems • The Stomachion The ABCs of Archimedes' work Archimedes' work is separated into three Codeces: Codex A: Codex B: • Balancing Planes • Balancing Planes • Quadrature of the Parabola • Quadrature of the Parabola • Sphere and Cylinder • On Floating Bodies • Spiral Lines Codex C: • Conoids and Spheroids • The Method of Mechanical • Measurement of a Circle Problems • The Sand-reckoner • Spiral Lines • The Stomachion • On Floating Bodies • Measurement of a Circle • Balancing Planes • Sphere and Cylinder The Reappearance of the Palimpsest Date: On Thursday, October 29, 1998 Location: Christie's Acution House, NY Selling price: $2.2 Million Research on Palimpsest was done by Walter's Art Museum in Baltimore, MD The Main Researchers Include: William Noel Mike Toth Reviel Netz Keith Knox Uwe Bergmann Codex A, B no more Codex A and B no longer exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedes and Liu Hui on Circles and Spheres Joseph W
    www.ontologia.net/studies Ontology Studies 10, 2010 21-38 Archimedes and Liu Hui on Circles and Spheres Joseph W. Dauben Department of History Herbert H. Lehman College and Ph.D. Program in History The Graduate Center The City University of New York Reception date / Fecha de recepción: 27-05-2009 Acceptation date / Fecha de aceptación: 22-06-2009 Abstract This article describes the mystery of a long lost codex of Archimedes that resurfaced briefly at the turn of the last century by Johan Ludwig Heiberg. Long enough for the Danish historian of mathematics Heiberg to identify, photograph and eventually transcribe “The Method” and several other works by Archimedes of considerable mathematical interest. In 1879 Heiberg completed his dissertation, Quaestiones Archimedeae, devoted to Archimedes’ life, works, and transmission of his texts. Keywords: Archimedes, Ephodos, Method, Johan Ludwig Heiberg. Resumen. Arquímedes y Hui Liu en torno a círculos y esferas. Este artículo describe el misterio de un códice de Arquímedes perdido hace mucho tiempo que reapareció brevemente a principios del siglo pasado de la mano de Johan Ludwig Heiberg. Tiempo suficiente para que el historiador danés de las matemáticas Heiberg pudiese identificar, fotografiar y, finalmente, transcribir “El Método” y varias otras obras de Arquímedes de interés matemático considerable. En 1879 Heiberg completó su tesis doctoral, Quaestiones Archimedeae, dedicado a la vida de Arquímedes, las obras, y la transmisión de sus textos. Palabras clave: Arquímedes, ephodos, método, Johan Ludwig Heiberg. This story begins with a mystery—the mystery of a long lost codex of Archimedes that resurfaced briefly at the turn of the last century, long enough for the Danish historian of mathematics Johan Ludwig Heiberg to identify, photograph and eventually transcribe “The Method” and several other works by Archimedes of considerable mathematical 22 Ontology Studies 10, 2010 Joseph W.
    [Show full text]
  • Order in the Cosmos
    11/12/2015 Order in the Cosmos: how Babylonians and Greeks Shaped our World 1 11/12/2015 2 11/12/2015 Two distinct periods of flowering: • Old Babylonian astronomy: during and after First Babylonian dynasty (Hammurabi) 1830‐1531 BCE • New Babylonian/Chaldean astronomy: Neo‐Babylonian (Nebuchadnezzar) 626‐539 BCE Medo‐Persian 539‐331 BCE Seleucid 335‐141 BCE Parthian 129 BCE‐224 AD timeline Babylonian astronomy Evans 1998 3 11/12/2015 Babylonian Astronomers: ∏ most consistent, systematic and thorough astronomical observers of antiquity ∑ First to recognize periodicity astronomical phenomena (e.g. eclipses !), and apply mathematical techniques for predictions ∑ Systematically observed and recorded the heavens: ‐ Records spanning many centuries (> millennium) ‐ Archives of cuneiform tablets ‐ Famous Examples: Enuma Anu Enlil 68‐70 tablets Kassite period (1650‐1150) tablet 63: Venus tablet of Ammisaduga MUL.APIN 700 BCE oldest copy: 686 BCE • Several types of astronomical texts in Babylonian astronomy. • Four principal types: 1) astronomical diaries 2) goal year texts 3) ephemerides 4) procedure texts • Ephemerides: ‐ listing of positions of planets and their meaning (eg. extreme points retrograde path) ‐ predictive: positions based on calculations (based on scheme) ‐ ephemerides for Moon ‐ ephemerides for planets • Procedure texts: description of procedure(s) to calculate ephemerides 4 11/12/2015 Old text, probably Kassite period (1595‐1157 BCE) • Amajor series of 68 or 70 tablets • dealing with Babylonian astrology. • bulk is a substantial collection of omens, estimated to number between 6500 and 7000, • interpreting a wide variety of celestial and atmospheric phenomena in terms relevant to the king and state 2. If with it a cloudbank lies on the right of the sun: the trade in barley and straw will expand.
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedes and the Palimpsest
    http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/ArchimedesPal.htm Archimedes and the Palimpsest Michael Lahanas “The Method” was a work of Archimedes unknown in the Middle Ages, but the importance of which was realized after its discovery. Archimedes pioneered the use of infinitesimals, showing how by dividing a figure in an infinite number of infinitely small parts could be used to determine its area or volume. It was found in the so-called Archimedes Palimpsest. The ancient text was found in a rare 10th- century Byzantine Greek manuscript which is probably the oldest and most authentic copy of Archimedes’ major works to survive, and contains transcriptions of his writing on geometry and physics. The 174 pages of text was according to the Greek orthodox church stolen but the owners were descendants of a Frenchman who legally bought the volume in the 1920s. It was sold for $2 million at Christie’s. The manuscript was the only source for his treatise “On The Method of Mathematical Theorems” and the only known copy of the original Greek text of his work, “On Floating Bodies”. The manuscript also contains the text of his works “On The Measurement of the Circle”, “On the Sphere and the Cylinder”, “On Spiral Lines” and “On the Equilibrium of Planes”. The volume is a palimpsest, a manuscript in which pages have been written on twice. As writing material was expensive an original text could be washed off so the parchment could be reused. The upper layer of writing on the document to be auctioned contains instructions for religious rites but underneath it contains versions of Archimedes’ most celebrated Greek texts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Mathematical Physics: New Light on an Old Question
    PMI Ciência: Mitos, Histórias e Factos Arquímedes Referência: http://www.aip.org/pt/june00/origins.htm The Origins of Mathematical Physics: New Light on an Old Question A recently resurfaced tenth century manuscript, the Archimedes Palimpsest, includes the sole extant copy of Archimedes’s treatise, the Method. As scholars begin study, new insights into Archimedes are emerging. -- Reviel Netz Imagine that you have to start science from scratch. … the Archimedes manuscript has been overwritten Upon what disciplines should you draw? Philosophy, by a twelfth century prayer book. (Palimpsestos is the for instance, discusses the nature of time, space, and Greek word for rescraped, or overwritten, parchment.) reality. Religion, too, tries to make sense of the world Work is only just beginning on uncovering and as a whole; and so, sometimes, does literature. Several studying the original text. Many scholars in the field disciplines—for example, biology and medicine—deal hope we are near a much better understanding of with special and highly significant features of the Archimedes. I have looked at the palimpsest, and I world. Such are the most natural ways to begin believe this hope is well founded. In this article, I thinking about the world, and, in fact, most cultures delineate some of Archimedes’s originality, give an make sense of their world through a combination of example of the new information the Archimedes such intellectual resources. Mathematics, in Palimpsest may provide us, and I suggest, tentatively, comparison, appears like a non-starter. Here is a theory what Archimedes’s mathematical physics may have dealing with abstract objects, aiming at internal meant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Universe Mechanized
    08/12/2016 1 08/12/2016 Pergamum Syracuse Rhodos Alexandria 2 08/12/2016 3 08/12/2016 Hipparchus Euclides Heron Apollonius of Perga Aristarchus Ptolemaeus Eratosthenes Archimedes 4 08/12/2016 Various astronomers made significant, even amazing, contributions. Noteworthy examples: ∑ Aristarchus of Samos ‐ Heliocentric Universe ‐ distance Moon & Sun ‐ size Sun ∑ Archimedes ‐ Planisphere/Planetarium ? ∑ Eratosthenes ‐ Diameter Earth ∑ Hipparchus ‐ multitude essential contributions Problematic is the loss of nearly all, except for a few, of the books and works they have written … 5 08/12/2016 “On the Sizes & Distances of the Sun and Moon ”: Only one work of Aristarchus survives: On the Sizes and the Distances of the Sun and Moon First mathematically based attempt to measure distance Earth‐Sun, thus First attempt to measure scale Universe Based upon geocentric view of Universe On the Sizes and the Distances Greek copy 10th century 6 08/12/2016 Aristarchus' geometric construction used to estimate the distance to the Sun. Earth (E) –Sun (S)‐Moon (M) triangle and sizes are not drawn to scale. Measure angle b: c = 90±‐b EM/ES = sin(c) Aristarchus: b = 87± real value: b = 89±50 ES = 19 EM real value: ES = 397 EM Numerically, very unstable procedure, reason for huge error. Nonetheless, On the Sizes and the Distances Greek copy 10th century Aristarchus' estimate of size Sun: angular diameter Sun ~ angular diameter Moon Dist. Earth‐Sun = 19 Dist. Earth‐Moon size Sun = 19 x size Moon size Sun > size Earth On the Sizes and the Distances Greek copy 10th century 7 08/12/2016 Archimedes, “the Sand Reckoner” (~200 BCE): You King Gelon are aware the ‘universe' is the name given by most astronomers to the sphere the center of which is the center of the Earth, while its radius is equal to the straight line between the center of the Sun and the center of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antikythera Mechanism
    Material The Antikythera Mechanism Copyrighted Universal-Publishers Material Copyrighted Universal-Publishers The Antikythera Mechanism The Story Behind the Genius of the Greek Computer and its Demise Material Evaggelos G. Vallianatos, PhD Copyrighted Universal-Publishers Universal-Publishers Irvine • Boca Raton The Antikythera Mechanism: The Story Behind the Genius of the Greek Computer and its Demise Copyright © 2021 Evaggelos G. Vallianatos. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. Universal Publishers, Inc. Irvine • Boca Raton USA • 2021 www.Universal-Publishers.com ISBN: 978-1-62734-358-9 (pbk.) ISBN: 978-1-62734-359-6 (ebk.) For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www. copyright.com or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC) at 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy licenseMaterial by the CCC, a separate system of payments has been arranged. Front cover painting of the Antikythera Mechanism by Evi Sarantea Painting of the Antikythera Mechanism by the Greek artist Evi Sarantea. The painting is a panorama of the artist’s vision of what the Antikythera Mechanism was at the time of its creation in the second century BCE and what it became in the twenty-first century: an emblem in a galactic temple decorated by a Renaissance clock and, on the left side, surrounded by the Wheel of the Sun god Helios depicting the Cosmos of the Sun, the Moon, and the planets, all bathed in stars and constellations, including the interlocking gears below the Cosmos.
    [Show full text]
  • MATH 100 Additional Topics
    Varied Topics for MATH 100 Dr. Ram\'onM. Figueroa-Centeno, Ph.D. June 17, 2009 1 How to Study Mathematics 1.1 The Work of Uri Treisman Here we will discuss how key is to foster class discussion and group work to succeed in Mathematics. Assign Uri Treisman's Dolciani Lecture: http://tinyurl.com/c8rgvf 2 Pattern Blocks http://math.rice.edu/~lanius/Patterns/ http://tinyurl.com/d2uqlh (Virtual Pattern Blocks) 3 Cuisenaire Rods (Integer Rods or Integer Bars) http://www.etacuisenaire.com/cuisenairerods/cuisenairerods.jsp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuisenaire_rods http://arcytech.org/java/integers/index.html (Lesson Plans) http://tinyurl.com/238zsg (Virtual Rods) http://www.elasticmind.com/labadabado/rods.html (Virtual Rods) http://tinyurl.com/ddrku6 (Virtual Rod Trains) http://tinyurl.com/c8m47o (Fractions) 1 4 Ethnomathematics 4.1 Native Hawaiian Mathematics Among the topics to be covered are: \bullet Konane. http://www.k12.hi.us/~gkaapuni/how_to_play_konane.htm http://tinyurl.com/c6gxay \bullet Nets and Netting http://www.ethnomath.org/resources/stokes1906.pdf \bullet Astronomy http://www.ethnomath.org/resources/makemson1938.pdf 4.2 The Mayas. http://tinyurl.com/dx6te8 \bullet Zero. http://mathforum.org/k12/mayan.math/ \bullet How to count in Maya (using Cuisenaire Rods). \bullet The Maya Calendar. The Long Count. 4.3 Africa http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0883857154 http://tinyurl.com/dbo88d Among the topics to be covered are: \bullet Sand Drawings http://tinyurl.com/cvk4gq \bullet The Ishango Bone. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishango_bone http://www.simonsingh.net/The_Ishango_Bone.html 2 4.4 The Story of 1 We will watch the film: The Story of 1 (60 Minutes).
    [Show full text]
  • The Method of Archimedes: Propositions 13 and 14
    The Method of Archimedes: Propositions 13 and 14 Shirley B. Gray, Daniel Ye Ding, Gustavo Gordillo, Samuel Landsberger, and Cye Waldman o area of mathematics has attracted more international attention in the past decade than the Palimpsest of Archimedes. The 1998 auction at Christie’s, followed by collaborative workN centered at the Walters Art Museum led to traveling museum exhibits, newspaper articles, television specials, and dozens of presentations. Mathematicians and other scholars attracted a new and significant audience. The singed, battered, faded, mildewed, damaged 10th century manuscript—the world’s oldest copy of The Method of Archimedes—sold for $2 million “under the hammer.” Mathematicians and classical Figure 1. Development of the hoof. scholars have long wondered just how close Archimedes (287–212 BC), a mechanical genius, had come to formulating modern calculus. The clues would surely lie in Propositions 13 and 14, if true Archimedean experimental tradition, we only they could be read. Though now transcribed, decided to avail ourselves of the opportunity the content may contain copyists’ errors. In the to look not retrospectively at the content of propositions in The Method but rather in terms Shirley B. Gray is professor of mathematics at Califor- of 21st century mathematics and technology. nia State University, Los Angeles. Her email address is [email protected]. Moreover, we believe we participated in every scholar’s quest to have a Eureka moment—we Daniel Ye Ding is an undergraduate student at Califor- found the Golden Ratio in our attempts to image nia State University, Los Angeles. His email address is [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • R. Netz, "Imagination and Layered Ontology in Greek Mathematics"
    Imagination and Layered Ontology in Greek Mathematics Reviel Netz Stanford University Abstract This essay is a study in the routine use of imagination in Greek math- ematical writings. By “routine” is meant both that this use is indeed very common, and that it is ultimately mundane. No flights of fancy, no poetical-like imaginative licenses are at stake. The issue rather is the systematic use made of the ability to imagine a virtual presence, and to refer to this virtual presence as if it were on equal footing with the real. This process is not merely routine in Greek mathematics: it may well be considered one of its chief characteristics. In this essay, I describe some features of this practice in detail, and then briefly offer some interpretative comments on the history and philosophy of this practice. The emphasis, however, is on the description, and I concen- trate mainly on one key element—the use of the Greek verb noein. Thus the structure of the essay is as follows: part 1 is an analysis of noein in Greek mathematical writings; part 2 is a less-detailed descrip- tion of other practices of Greek mathematics that involve “imagina- tion” or, in general, a “layered” reality; and part 3 is a tentative inter- pretation.1 1. At this point, the reader might imagine a set of definitions: What is the real? What is the imaginary? What is the virtual? Such chimeras are to be banished. There is no profit in discussing such abstract generalities and a lot to be gained from understand- ing particular practices: this essay elucidates, in detail, just one such practice of imagi- nation.
    [Show full text]