DOCSLIB.ORG

Census 2000 Demographic Profiles City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Census 2000 Demographic Profiles City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods Census 2000 Demographic Profiles City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods June 2002 Funded by the UPMC Department of Community Initiatives Documentation This data is complied from Census Bureau Summary File 1 data. Summary File 1 (SF 1) contains 286 detailed tables focusing on age, sex, households, families, and housing units. These tables provide in-depth figures by race and Hispanic origin; some tables are repeated for each of nine race/Latino groups. The tables here are a selected subset of data avaialable in the SF1 datasets produced by the census. This data was aggregated from individual census tracts into data for specific neighborhoods in the city of Pittsburgh. Neighborhood defintions were obtained from the City of Pittsburgh Planning Department. These defintions consisted of an index of census tracts to city neighborhoods. Note that for the 2000 Census, the question on race was changed from what had been asked in the 1990 Census. and responses reflect self-identification. Respondents were asked to report the race or races they considered themselves and other members of their households to be. For the 2000 census, more than one racial category could be selected. Most respondents selected only a single racial characterization but the option to select two or more racial categories was avaialable. For this reason the 1990 and 2000 Census data by race are not directly comparable. People who responded to the question on race by indicating only one race are referred to as the race alone population, or the group who reported only one race. For example, respondents who marked only the White category on the census questionnaire would be included in the White alone population. 2 Allegheny Center......................................... 4 Lincoln Place............................................. 49 Allegheny West........................................... 5 Lincoln-Larimer ........................................ 50 Allentown.................................................... 6 Lower Lawrenceville................................. 51 Arlington ..................................................... 7 Manchester ................................................ 52 Arlington Heights........................................8 Marshall-Shade.......................................... 53 Banksville....................................................9 Middle Hill ................................................ 54 Bedford Dwellings .................................... 10 Morningside .............................................. 55 Beechview ................................................. 11 Mount Oliver............................................. 56 Beltzhoover ............................................... 12 Mount Washington....................................57 Bloomfield................................................. 13 New Homestead ........................................ 58 Bluff .......................................................... 14 North Oakland........................................... 59 Bon Air...................................................... 15 North Shore ............................................... 60 Brighton Heights ....................................... 16 Northview Heights .................................... 61 Brookline...................................................17 Oakwood ................................................... 62 California Kurkbudle................................. 18 Overbrook.................................................. 63 Carrick....................................................... 19 Perry North................................................ 64 Central Lawrenceville ............................... 20 Perry South................................................ 65 Central Northside ...................................... 21 Point Breeze .............................................. 66 Central Oakland......................................... 22 Point Breeze North.................................... 67 Chartiers City ............................................ 23 Polish Hill..................................................68 Chateau...................................................... 24 Regent Square ........................................... 69 Crafton Heights ......................................... 25 Ridgemont ................................................. 70 Crawford-Roberts...................................... 26 Saint Clair..................................................71 Duquesne Heights ..................................... 27 Shadyside .................................................. 72 East Allegheny .......................................... 28 Sheraden.................................................... 73 East Carnegie............................................. 29 South Oakland........................................... 74 East Hills ...................................................30 South Shore ...............................................75 East Liberty ............................................... 31 South Side Flats.........................................76 Elliot..........................................................32 South Side Slopes......................................77 Esplen........................................................ 33 Spring Garden ........................................... 78 Fairywood..................................................34 Spring Hill-CV ..........................................79 Fineview.................................................... 35 Squirrel Hill North ....................................80 Friendship.................................................. 36 Squirrel Hill South ....................................81 Garfield...................................................... 37 Stanton Heights .........................................82 Glen Hazel................................................. 38 Strip District .............................................. 83 Golden Triangle......................................... 39 Summer Hill .............................................. 84 Greenfield.................................................. 40 Swisshelm Park ......................................... 85 Hays........................................................... 41 Terrace Village.......................................... 86 Hazelwood................................................. 42 Troy Hill.................................................... 87 Highland Park............................................ 43 Upper Hill.................................................. 88 Homewood North...................................... 44 Upper Lawrenceville................................. 89 Homewood South...................................... 45 West End ................................................... 90 Homewood West....................................... 46 West Oakland ............................................ 91 Knoxville...................................................47 Westwood.................................................. 92 Larimer...................................................... 48 Windgap .................................................... 93 3 Census 2000 Demographic Profiles - City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods Page 4 Allegheny Center Population by Race and Gender Total Men Women Group Quarters Population Total 886 445 (50.2%) 441 (49.8%) Total Group Quarters 0 (0.0%) White Alone 458 (51.7%) 250 (54.6%) 208 (45.4%) Institutionalized 0 (0.0%) Black Alone 386 (43.6%) 172 (44.6%) 214 (55.4%) Non-Institutionalized 0 (0.0%) Asian Alone 17 (1.9%) 9 (52.9%) 8 (47.1%) Two or more races 14 (1.6%) 6 (42.9%) 8 (57.1%) Housing Units Hispanic1 11 (1.2%) 6 (54.5%) 5 (45.5%) Total Housing Units 675 Occupied 465 (68.9%) Land Area in Square Miles 0.20 Owner Occupied 45 (9.7%) Population Density (Total Population per Square Mile) 4,427.0 Renter Occupied 420 (90.3%) Vacant 210 (31.1%) Population by Race and Major Age Group Race by Single Race Total White Black Asian 2 or More Hispanic1 Races Total 886 458 386 17 14 11 Age 0-17 155 (17.5%) 5 (1.1%) 145 (37.6%) 2 (11.8%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (9.1%) Age 18-64 575 (64.9%) 325 (71.0%) 218 (56.5%) 14 (82.4%) 10 (71.4%) 10 (90.9%) Age 65+ 156 (17.6%) 128 (27.9%) 23 (6.0%) 1 (5.9%) 4 (28.6%) 0 (0.0%) Families by Race and Presence of Own Children Race by Single Race Total White Black Asian 2 or More Races Hispanic1 Total Families 133 32 96 2 3 1 Married Couple Families 45 24 17 2 2 0 With Own Children under 18 12 2 8 2 0 0 Male Headed Families with Own Children under 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female Headed Families with Children under 183 55 0 54 0 1 1 Population Under 18 by Family Structure Race by Single Race Total White Black Asian 2 or More Races Hispanic1 Total 155 5 145 2 0 1 In Married Couple Household 25 3 20 2 0 0 Male householder, no wife present2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female householder, no husband present3 107 0 104 0 0 0 Grandchild 16 0 16 0 0 0 Other relatives 2 0 2 0 0 0 Non-relatives 5 2 3 0 0 1 In group quarters 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hispanic can be of any race. 2 no wife present 3 no husband present 4 Census 2000 Demographic Profiles - City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods Page 5 Allegheny West Population by Race and Gender Total Men Women Group Quarters Population Total 508 296 (58.3%) 212 (41.7%) Total Group Quarters 0 (0.0%) White Alone 385 (75.8%) 230 (59.7%) 155 (40.3%) Institutionalized 0 (0.0%) Black Alone 105 (20.7%) 54 (51.4%) 51 (48.6%) Non-Institutionalized 0 (0.0%) Asian Alone 7 (1.4%) 6 (85.7%) 1 (14.3%) Two or more races 6 (1.2%) 3 (50.0%)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Affordable Housing Plan for Fineview & Perry Hilltop
    A FIVE-YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN FOR FINEVIEW & PERRY HILLTOP PERRY W H IE IL V L E T O N I P P F P O E T R L R L I www . our future hilltop . org Y H H Y I L R L R T E O P PE P R R Y F W I E I N V W E H PREPARED BY: IE IL V L E T Studio for Spatial Practice O N I P P F Valentina Vavasis Consulting P O E T R L R L I Ariam Ford Consulting www . our future hilltop . org Y H H Y I L R L R T E O P P PER R F W I E I N Y V W E H IE IL V L E T O N I P P F P O E T R L R L I www . our future hilltop . org Y H H Y I L R L R T E O P P F W I E I N V E FIVE-YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PREPARED BY Special Thanks to: Studio for Spatial Practice Valentina Vavasis Consulting Fineview Citizens Council Housing Working Group Board Of Directors Members Ariam Ford Consulting Christine Whispell, President Fred Smith, Co-Chair Terra Ferderber, Vice President Sally Stadelman, Co-Chair FOR Jeremy Tischuk, Treasurer Robin Alexander, former Chair Fineview Citizens Council Greg Manley, Secretary Betty Davis Perry Hilltop Citizens Council Chris Caldwell Diondre Johnson Diondre Johnson Lance McFadden WITH SUPPORT FROM Robyn Pisor Doyle Mel McWilliams The Buhl Foundation Cheryl Gainey Eliska Tischuk ONE Northside Tiffany Simpson Christine Whispell Eliska Tischuk Lenita Wiley Perry Hilltop Citizens Council Fineview and Perry Hilltop Board Of Directors Citizens Council Staff Dwayne Barker, President Joanna Deming, Executive Director Reggie Good, Vice President Lukas Bagshaw, Community Gwen Marcus, Treasurer Outreach Coordinator Janet Gunter, Secretary Carla Arnold, AmeriCorps VISTA Engagement Specialist Pauline Criswell Betty Davis Gia Haley Lance McFadden Sally Stadelman Antjuan Washinghton Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Profiles Census 2010 Summary File 1 (Sf1) Data
    CITY OF PITTSBURGH NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILES CENSUS 2010 SUMMARY FILE 1 (SF1) DATA PROGRAM IN URBAN AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND URBAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH JULY 2011 www.ucsur.pitt.edu About the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) The University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) was established in 1972 to serve as a resource for researchers and educators interested in the basic and applied social and behavioral sciences. As a hub for interdisciplinary research and collaboration, UCSUR promotes a research agenda focused on the social, economic and health issues most relevant to our society. UCSUR maintains a permanent research infrastructure available to faculty and the community with the capacity to: (1) conduct all types of survey research, including complex web surveys; (2) carry out regional econometric modeling; (3) analyze qualitative data using state‐of‐the‐art computer methods, including web‐based studies; (4) obtain, format, and analyze spatial data; (5) acquire, manage, and analyze large secondary and administrative data sets including Census data; and (6) design and carry out descriptive, evaluation, and intervention studies. UCSUR plays a critical role in the development of new research projects through consultation with faculty investigators. The long‐term goals of UCSUR fall into three broad domains: (1) provide state‐of‐the‐art research and support services for investigators interested in interdisciplinary research in the behavioral, social, and clinical sciences; (2) develop nationally recognized research programs within the Center in a few selected areas; and (3) support the teaching mission of the University through graduate student, post‐ doctoral, and junior faculty mentoring, teaching courses on research methods in the social sciences, and providing research internships to undergraduate and graduate students.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher and Rapid Rehousing Programs in Allegheny County
    Research Report Moving to Opportunity or Disadvantage? An Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher and Rapid Rehousing Programs in Allegheny County March 2020 The Allegheny County Department of Human Services One Smithfield Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 www.alleghenycountyanalytics.us Basic Needs | An Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher and Rapid Rehousing Programs in Allegheny County | March 2020 page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Figures and Tables 5 Definitions 6 Acronyms 7 Introduction 7 Background 7 Methodology 11 Limitations 15 Analysis 15 Demographics of Rental Subsidy Participants 15 HCV Households by Level of Disadvantage (move-in date 2017) 16 RRH Households by Level of Disadvantage (move-in date 2017) 18 Insights from Both Programs 20 Subsidized Housing Distribution in City of Pittsburgh versus Suburban Census Tracts 22 County-Wide Distribution of Households Living in Areas of High or Extreme Disadvantage 24 Moving Patterns Among HCV Households over Time 26 Discussion and Next Steps 27 APPENDIX A: HCV and RRH Program Details 30 APPENDIX B: Community Disadvantage Indicators and Sources 32 APPENDIX C: Allegheny County Census Tracts by Level of Disadvantage 33 APPENDIX D: Allegheny County Census Tracts by Disadvantage with Municipal Borders and Labels 34 APPENDIX E: Allegheny County Census Tracts by Disadvantage with City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods and Labels 35 www.alleghenycountyanalytics.us | The Allegheny County Department of Human Services Basic Needs | An Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher and Rapid Rehousing Programs in Allegheny County | March 2020 page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Decades of social science research show that place has a profound influence on child-to-adult outcomes and this finding has far-reaching implications for how affordable housing policy should be designed and implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • URA Board Agenda: 11/12/2020
    URA Board Agenda: 11/12/2020 URA Board Agenda Date/Time Thursday, November 12, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. Web Access: https://zoom.us/j/98871933700 Dial In: +1 929 205 6099 ID # 988 7193 3700 URA Regular Board Meeting AGENDA “A” 1. Roll Call 2. Public Comment 3. General a. Approval of Meeting Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting of October 8, 2020. 4. RFPs, RFQs, RFIs & Bids a. RFQ for Appraisal Service Providers. b. RFQ for Title Service Providers. c. RFP for Tax and Audit Services for Invest PGH. d. Invitation for Bids for 925 Technology Drive (South Oakland). e. Request for proposals (RFP) for CM/CI Services for 925 Technology Drive (South Oakland) f. RFQ for a Contractor Equity program. 5. Announcements a. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Pre-application. b. Monthly Housing Lending Dashboard. c. Final COVID-19 Lending Dashboard. d. Monthly Commercial Lending Dashboard. 1 URA Board Agenda: 11/12/2020 e. Hazelwood Library – Extend Due Diligence Period with HQ, LLC and Pittsburgh Gateways Corporation. f. The Centre Avenue RFQ Community Meeting hosted by District 6 will be held on November 14, 2020, at 10 a.m. g. Commercial Rent Relief Update. h. Business Services Economic Recovery Dashboard 6. Administrative (Pages 5 Through 6) a. Savvior Technology Solutions Contract Expansion (pp 5-6) i. Ratification of the increase to the Professional Services contract with Savvior Technology Solutions by up to $50,000. ii. Authorization to increase the Professional Services contract with Savvior Technology Solutions up to an additional $150,000. 7. Residential Lending & Investments (Pages 7 Through 22) a.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of Change in the City of Pittsburgh
    PROFILE OF CHANGE IN THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH COMPARISON OF 2009‐2013 AND 2014‐2018 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY (ACS) ESTIMATES FOR THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND NEIGHBORHOODS PROGRAM IN URBAN AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND URBAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH JANUARY 2020 PROFILE OF CHANGE IN THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH – JANUARY 2020 Table of Contents Data and Methodology ............................................................................................ 2 Population Trends in the City of Pittsburgh ............................................................. 3 Age ........................................................................................................................ 4 Race ...................................................................................................................... 5 Educational Attainment ........................................................................................ 7 Commuting ........................................................................................................... 8 Housing Tenure ..................................................................................................... 9 Poverty ................................................................................................................ 10 Veterans .............................................................................................................. 11 Data Profiles ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Census 2000 City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Rankings – November 2002 Ranked by Percent Population Age 25 and Over with Bachelors Degree Or Higher
    Census 2000 City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Rankings – November 2002 Ranked by Percent Population Age 25 and over with Bachelors degree or higher 1 Squirrel Hill North 76.5% 46 Crafton Heights 14.1% 2 Shadyside 71.7% 47 Polish Hill 14.1% 3 Point Breeze 69.1% 48 New Homestead 13.5% 4 Regent Square 67.4% 49 Central Lawrenceville 12.9% 5 North Oakland 66.8% 50 Bon Air 12.1% 6 Squirrel Hill South 63.0% 51 Sheraden 12.1% 7 Allegheny West 55.3% 52 Perry South 11.8% 8 North Shore 55.1% 53 Hazelwood 11.7% 9 Highland Park 53.1% 54 Beltzhoover 11.3% 10 Central Oakland 45.1% 55 Crawford-Roberts 11.0% 11 Friendship 42.5% 56 Allentown 10.5% 12 Point Breeze North 35.0% 57 Lincoln-Larimer 10.4% 13 Strip District 34.2% 58 California Kurkbudle 10.3% 14 Allegheny Center 34.2% 59 Overbrook 10.3% 15 Swisshelm Park 33.6% 60 East Hills 10.3% 16 Banksville 32.9% 61 Carrick 10.3% 17 Stanton Heights 31.9% 62 Middle Hill 9.8% 18 Greenfield 29.9% 63 Garfield 9.7% 19 Duquesne Heights 29.5% 64 Troy Hill 9.7% 20 South Shore 27.9% 65 Spring Hill-CV 9.5% 21 Bloomfield 27.6% 66 Upper Lawrenceville 9.2% 22 South Oakland 27.3% 67 Homewood West 9.0% 23 Morningside 27.0% 68 Lincoln Place 8.8% 24 South Side Flats 25.2% 69 Larimer 8.5% 25 Mount Washington 24.3% 70 Homewood North 8.3% 26 Central Northside 24.1% 71 Knoxville 8.3% 27 West Oakland 23.1% 72 Fairywood 8.2% 28 Golden Triangle 22.9% 73 Arlington 7.9% 29 Oakwood 22.1% 74 Chartiers City 7.9% 30 Westwood 21.9% 75 Hays 7.8% 31 Brighton Heights 21.3% 76 Glen Hazel 7.5% 32 Perry North 21.0% 77 Elliot 7.4% 33 Upper Hill
    [Show full text]
  • PRIORITY AREAS PRIORITY AREAS MAIN, ELM, WILDS, TRAIL COMMUNITIES Targeted Small Business Development Programs As of July 01, 2020
    PA CARES PRIORITY AREAS PRIORITY AREAS MAIN, ELM, WILDS, TRAIL COMMUNITIES Targeted Small Business Development Programs as of July 01, 2020 Place Name County Name Active Main Active Elm Trail PA Wilds Contact Organization Address of Contact Zip code Program Email Phone Street Street Town Gateway of Manager Program Program Program Town Contact Aliquippa Beaver Yes Aliquippa Alliance for Unity and Dev. (Paramount 392 Franklin Ave. 15001 Trish Digliodo [email protected] (724) 385-0862 Pursuits Consultants) Allentown - 7th Street Lehigh Yes Community Action Development Corp. of 523-525 N. 7th Street 18102 Dan Bosket [email protected] (610) 433-5703 Allentown Allentown - Hamilton Lehigh Yes Downton Allentown Business Alliance 840 Hamilton Street, Ste 18101 Betsy Kohl [email protected] (484) 226-6323 Street 205 Ambler Montgomery Yes Ambler Main Street P.O. Box 36 19002 Liz Wahl [email protected] (215) 527-6906 Kunzier Ansonia Tioga Yes PA Wilds P.O. Box 285, Sugar Grove, 16901 PA Wilds [email protected] 814-757-9190 PA 16350 Ardmore/Lower Merion Montgomery Yes The Ardmore Initiative 56 E Lancaster AVE 19003 Nancy Scarlato [email protected] (610) 645-0540 Austin Potter Yes PA Wilds P.O. Box 285, Sugar Grove, 16720 PA Wilds [email protected] 814-757-9190 PA 16350 Avis Clinton Yes PA Wilds P.O. Box 285, Sugar Grove, 17721 PA Wilds [email protected] 814-757-9190 PA 16350 Beaver Falls Beaver Yes Beaver County Chamber of Commerce 1008 7th Ave. 15010 Trish Digliodo [email protected] (724) 385-0862 (Paramount Pursuits Consultants Bedford Bedford Yes Downtown Bedford, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Perry South Fineview Marshall-Shadeland Perry North
    I Cit y of Pittsburgh - Depa rtment of C it y Planning - Geogra phic Informa tion Sy stems - C ity of Pittsburgh - Depa rtment of C ity Pla nning - Geogra phic Informat ion Sy stems - City of Pittsbur gh - D epar tment of City Pla nning - Geographic Information Sy stems - City of Pit tsburgh - D epar tment of City Pla nning - G eogr aphic Information Sys tems - City of Pitt sburgh - Depart ment of City Planning - G eogr aphic Infor ma tion Syst ems - City of Pitts burgh - Depa rtment of City Planning - Geogra phic Infor ma tion Systems - Cit y of Pittsburgh - Depa rtment of Cit y Planning - Geogra phic Informa tion Sy stems - C ity of Pittsburgh - Depa rtment of C ity Pla nning - Geogra phic Informa tion Sy stems - City of Pittsbur gh - D epar tment of City Pla nning - Geographic Information Sy stems - City of Pit tsburgh - D epar tment of City Pla nning - G eogr aphic Information Sys tems - City of Pitt sburgh - Depart ment of City Planning - G eogr aphic Infor ma tion Syst ems - City of Pitts burgh - Depa rtment of City Planning - Geogra phic Infor ma tion Systems - Cit y of Pittsburgh - Depa rtment of Cit y Planning - Geogra phic Informa tion Sy stems - C ity of Pittsburgh - Depa rtment of C ity Pla nning - Geogra phic Informa tion Sy stems - City of Pittsbur gh - D epar tment of City Pla nning - Geographic Informat ion Sy stems - City of Pit tsbur gh - D epar tment of City Pla nning - G eogr aphic Information Sys tems - City of Pitt sburgh - Depart ment of City Planning - G eogr aphic Infor mation Syst ems - City of Pitts burgh -
    [Show full text]
  • Map Pittsburgh: Status by Neighborhood
    Map Pittsburgh: status by neighborhood Map Pittsburgh is a project of the city Department of Planning in which volunteers in 29 city neighborhoods have walked block by block over the past five years to record how every property in the city is being used. Lincoln- Summer Hill Morningside Lemington- Upper Belmar Lawrenceville Perry North Northview Brighton Heights Heights Spring Stanton Garden Heights Marshall- Troy Highland Lincoln- Shadeland Marshall-Shadeland Hill Central Park Lemington- Lawrenceville Belmar Windgap Chartiers Esplen California- Perry South Spring Hill- City Kirkbride City View Lower Garfield Homewood Homewood Fineview East West Lawrenceville Liberty Larimer North Central Bloomfield Sheraden Manchester North Side Allegheny East Polish Hill Friendship Fairywood Allegheny Upper AlleghenyCentral Hill Shadyside East Hills Crafton Chateau West trip District Heights Elliott North Shore S North Middle HillVillage Oakland Squirrel Point Homewood West Central Crawford- South End Business Roberts Terrace Hill North Breeze Duquesne District Point Breeze North Heights Bluff Oakwood South So Central Westwood uth Oakland Oakland Regent East Shore Squirrel Square Carnegie Southside Flats Hill South Mount Ridgemont Washington Allen- Greenfield town Southside Slopes Swisshelm Beltz- Park hoover Knoxville Arl Beechview ington Hazelwood Banksville Bon St. Clair Air Glen Mount Arlington Hazel Oliver Mt. Heights Brookline Borough Oliver KEY Hays Map Pittsburgh Status Carrick Not in System New Homestead Data Collection and Analysis Overbrook Public Process/Council Completed Lincoln Place Source: Pittsburgh Department of City Planning Post-Gazette.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Line Replacements Gain Momentum
    June 2018 Lead Line Replacements Gain Momentum IN THIS ISSUE: 1 Lead Service Line As part of its Community Lead “Our recent progress on multiple layers of coordination Replacement Response, the Pittsburgh removing lead lines from between customers and 2 RAW Talk Water and Sewer Authority our system reflects PWSA’s construction crews who 3 PWSA in the (PWSA) and its contractors steadfast commitment to must work in public roads Community have replaced over 1,200 protecting the public’s and inside private property. PWSA in the News residential lead service lines. health. Our leadership team To meet this demand, 5 Engineering and The program has reached is tackling this program with PWSA has established a 6 Construction new levels of productivity, every resource available, 30-person, cross-functional Team PWSA with five contractors and and we are grateful to our team of engineers, 7 over a dozen separate work customers for allowing us into plumbers, customer service 9 Water Wise crews replacing full lead lines their homes to reduce their representatives, and 10 PWSA Connect in neighborhoods across risk of exposure to lead in communications specialists PWSA’s drinking water service water,” said PWSA Executive dedicated to replacing as COMING UP: area. The program has also Director Robert A. Weimar. many full lead service lines as 2018 Board Meeting Dates replaced over 300 privately- Water service lines are made possible. July 27 (no August meeting) owned lead service lines, thus up of two parts – a public side Contractor lead line South Side Planning Forum avoiding potentially harmful that runs from the water main replacement work to-date June 25 partial lead service line to the curb, and a private has taken place in Mount Brashear Center replacements.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Analysis Unit Date: 01/12/2021 Subject: Zone One, December 2020
    Crime Analysis Memo To: Sgt. Burford, Zone One From: Crime Analysis Unit Date: 01/12/2021 Subject: Zone One, December 2020 Note: The following statistics are based on calls for service data and reported crimes (not UCR vetted). Analysis Highlights: In December 2020, there was a total of 174 reported crimes in Zone One; Shots fired accounted for the most reported crime type with 64 reported; Brighton Heights and East Allegheny accounted for the most reported crimes with 21 each; Zone One calls for service in December decreased every year since 2017; Zone One calls for service in December decreased 6.4% from the previous year and decreased 15% from 2017; In 2020, calls for service were the highest in August then decrease every month following (December was the second lowest month for calls for service in 2020); Citizens initiated 58.3% of calls for service while officers initiated (on-view incidents) the remaining 41.7% of calls for service; Included in this memo: A chart of Zone One Reported Crimes in December 2020 by Type A table of Zone One Reported Crime Totals in December 2020 by Neighborhood A chart of Zone One Calls for Service in December by Year (2017 – 2020) A chart of Zone One Calls for Service by Month (2020) A chart of Zone One Citizen vs. Officer Initiated Calls for Service (December 2020) Data for this memo was pulled on 01/04/2021 Zone One Reported Crime Totals in December 2020 by Neighborhood Neighborhood Total Allegheny Center 4 Allegheny West 2 Brighton Heights 21 California-Kirkbride 3 Central Northside 14 East Allegheny 21 Fineview 8 Manchester 9 Marshall-Shadeland 19 North Shore 1 Northview Heights 19 Perry North 6 Perry South 11 Spring Hill-City View 16 Summer Hill 13 Troy Hill 7 Nicole Merrick, Crime Analyst Crime Analysis Unit Commander Holmes, Chief of Staff Pittsburgh Bureau of Police 1203 Western Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15233 [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • City of Pittsburgh 2009
    PA CleanWays Illegal Dump Survey Final Report City of Pittsburgh 2009 PA CleanWays Empowering people to eliminate illegal dumping and littering in Pennsylvania Empowering people to eliminate illegal dumping and littering in Pennsylvania. Since 1990, PA CleanWays has been dedicated to empowering people to eliminate illegal dumping and littering. Through the coordinated efforts of more than 41,500 PA CleanWays cleanup volunteers, over 10,100 tons of trash and 126,000 tires have been removed from illegal dumpsites in Pennsylvania and properly disposed. Through special collection events sponsored by PA CleanWays chapters and affiliates, an additional 255,000 tires and 24,000 appliances have been properly disposed. Our experience indicates that local involvement, partnerships, and support are vital to lasting success in addressing illegal dumping and littering. PA CleanWays 105 West Fourth Street, Greensburg, PA 15601 Phone: 724‐836‐4121 •Toll Free: 877‐772‐3673 Fax: 724‐836‐1980 • www.pacleanways.org City of Pittsburgh Illegal Dumpsite Survey 2009 Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PA CleanWays is a nonprofit organization that empowers people to eliminate illegal dumping and littering in Pennsylvania through various education and environmental programs. PA CleanWays’ illegal dump surveys educate state, county, and local officials about the problem of illegal dumping and provide valuable data about the dumpsites and the community in which they reside to address the problem through cleanups, municipal waste collections, and recycling programs. Illegal dumpsite identification was completed by driving roads and contacting various constituent groups such as municipal offices and community services, state agencies, and environmental and conservation groups in the City of Pittsburgh.
    [Show full text]