DOCSLIB.ORG

Reconnaissance and Targeted Flora and Vegetation Survey Wingebellup Road and Kojonup – Frankland Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reconnaissance and Targeted Flora and Vegetation Survey Wingebellup Road and Kojonup – Frankland Road Reconnaissance and Targeted Flora and Vegetation Survey Wingebellup Road and Kojonup – Frankland Road Prepared for the Shire of Cranbrook December 2020 PO Box 9179, Picton WA 6229 0484 771 825 | [email protected] Version Origin Review Review date Release approval Issue date V1 C. Spencer 25/11/2020 V2 C. Spencer R. Smith 30/11/2020 Final Draft D. Brace SoCranbrook 1/12/2020 Ecoedge 1/12/2020 Final C. Spencer D. Brace 7/12/2020 Ecoedge 7/12/2020 2 | Page Executive Summary Ecoedge was engaged by the Shire of Cranbrook to undertake a Reconnaissance and Targeted Flora and Vegetation Survey of approximately 0.58 hectares of road reserve located in four separate locations, one on Wingebellup Road and three along the Kojonup Frankland Road. Area 1 is approximately 6.5 km west of the town of Frankland River. The flora and vegetation survey was undertaken on the 30 September 2020 in accordance with the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) Technical Guidance - Flora and Vegetation Surveys for Environmental Impact Assessment (EPA, 2016). 72 species of vascular flora (including 24 introduced species) were identified across the four areas No Threatened flora, Priority flora or other flora of conservation significance were found. One of the introduced species was the Declared Pest Asparagus asparagoides (Bridal creeper). Seven vegetation units were described across the survey area, most of which is in a degraded condition due to the occurrence of the vegetation in road reserves in a predominantly agricultural area. None of vegetation units meet the criteria of a State listed Priority Ecological Community (PEC) or the criteria of a State or Federally listed Threatened Ecological Community (TEC). One Vegetation Association is mapped across the four Survey areas: Association 4 ‘medium woodland; marri & wandoo’. The current Statewide extent of this association (at 26.95 %) is below the Commonwealth government’s 30% retention threshold, with 14.48% represented within the DBCA estate. The current extent of this association within the Shire of Cranbrook exceeds the target at 33.12%. Vegetation Units A, B and C are regarded as having vegetation associated with and dependant on the Frankland River waterway. Vegetation Units E and F which is dependent on and associated with an ephemeral wetland in a depression at the base of a hill. Vegetation associated with waterways and wetlands is specially protected under the EP Act. The survey areas 1, 2 and 3 form part of a network of connected native vegetation associated with the Frankland River in a predominantly cleared agricultural landscape. There are no Environmentally Sensitive Areas within or in close proximity to the survey area. 3 | Page Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 Statement of Limitations ........................................................................................................... 7 Reliance on Data..................................................................................................................... 7 Report for Benefit of Client .................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Scope and Objectives .................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Biogeographic Region and Location ............................................................................ 8 1.3 Climate ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Geology...................................................................................................................... 14 1.5 Vegetation Description according to pre-European Mapping Datasets ................... 16 1.5.1 Vegetation Associations ..................................................................................... 16 1.5.2 Assessment of Remaining Extent against Pre-European Extent ....................... 16 1.6 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ..................................................... 17 1.7 Threatened and Priority Flora ................................................................................... 20 1.8 Ecological Corridors and Connectivity....................................................................... 27 1.9 Wetlands and Watercourses ..................................................................................... 27 1.10 Environmentally Sensitive Areas ............................................................................... 27 2 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 29 2.1 Desktop Assessment ................................................................................................. 29 2.2 Field Survey ............................................................................................................... 29 2.3 Survey Limitations ..................................................................................................... 29 3 Results............................................................................................................................... 31 3.1 Flora ........................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Vegetation Units ........................................................................................................ 32 3.2.1 Survey area 1 - Wingellebup Road ..................................................................... 32 3.2.2 Survey area 2...................................................................................................... 33 3.2.3 Survey area 3...................................................................................................... 36 3.2.4 Survey area 4...................................................................................................... 38 3.3 Vegetation Condition ................................................................................................ 40 3.3.1 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ............................................. 46 3.3.2 Waterway Dependent Communities ................................................................. 46 4 | Page 4 Discussion and Conclusions .............................................................................................. 49 5 References ........................................................................................................................ 51 Appendix 1. Categories of DBCA Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities (DBCA 2018a, 2019b). ......................................................................................................................... 54 Appendix 2. Categories of Threatened Ecological Communities under the EPBC Act (DotEE, 2018b). ......................................................................................................................................... Appendix 3. Protected Matters Search Tool and NatureMap reports ........................................ Appendix 4. Categories of Threatened and Priority List flora (DBCA, 2019b). ............................ Appendix 5. Categories of Threatened Species under the EPBC Act (DotEE, 2018b). ................ Appendix 6. Track log. .................................................................................................................. Appendix 7. Vegetation Condition Scale (EPA, 2016). ................................................................. Appendix 8. List of Vascular Flora found within the survey area. ............................................... Table of Tables Table 1. Soil mapping units for the survey area (Stuart-Street 2005). .................................... 14 Table 2. Vegetation Associations within the project area with regard to the Commonwealth retention targets (Government of Western Australia, 2019). ................................................. 17 Table 3. TECs potentially occurring within 30 km of the survey area (DBCA 2020b, DAWE 2020b). ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Table 4.Threatened and Priority List flora known to occur within 30 km of the survey area (DBCA 2020c, 2020d; DAWE 2020b.) ....................................................................................... 21 Table 5. Limitations of the field survey with regard to assessment adequacy and accuracy. 30 Table 6. Breakdown of vegetation unit areas with Area 1. ..................................................... 33 Table 7. Breakdown of vegetation unit areas within Area 2. .................................................. 35 Table 8. Breakdown of vegetation unit areas within Area 3. .................................................. 37 Table 9. Breakdown of vegetation unit areas within Area 4. .................................................. 39 Table 10. Breakdown of vegetation condition per survey area. ............................................. 40 Table 11. A breakdown of vegetation condition by vegetation unit. ...................................... 41 Table 12. Typical waterway dependent flora species within the Survey area. ....................... 46
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cunninghamia Date of Publication: February 2020 a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia
    Cunninghamia Date of Publication: February 2020 A journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia ISSN 0727- 9620 (print) • ISSN 2200 - 405X (Online) The Australian paintings of Marianne North, 1880–1881: landscapes ‘doomed shortly to disappear’ John Leslie Dowe Australian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, Smithfield, Qld 4878 AUSTRALIA. [email protected] Abstract: The 80 paintings of Australian flora, fauna and landscapes by English artist Marianne North (1830-1890), completed during her travels in 1880–1881, provide a record of the Australian environment rarely presented by artists at that time. In the words of her mentor Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker, director of Kew Gardens, North’s objective was to capture landscapes that were ‘doomed shortly to disappear before the axe and the forest fires, the plough and the flock, or the ever advancing settler or colonist’. In addition to her paintings, North wrote books recollecting her travels, in which she presented her observations and explained the relevance of her paintings, within the principles of a ‘Darwinian vision,’ and inevitable and rapid environmental change. By examining her paintings and writings together, North’s works provide a documented narrative of the state of the Australian environment in the late nineteenth- century, filtered through the themes of personal botanical discovery, colonial expansion and British imperialism. Cunninghamia (2020) 20: 001–033 doi: 10.7751/cunninghamia.2020.20.001 Cunninghamia: a journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia © 2020 Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/science/Scientific_publications/cunninghamia 2 Cunninghamia 20: 2020 John Dowe, Australian paintings of Marianne North, 1880–1881 Introduction The Marianne North Gallery in the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew houses 832 oil paintings which Marianne North (b.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?
    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants Sixth Edition Sixth Edition AUSTRALIAN Native Plants Cultivation, Use in Landscaping and Propagation
    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SIXTH EDITION SIXTH EDITION AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS Cultivation, Use in Landscaping and Propagation John W. Wrigley Murray Fagg Sixth Edition published in Australia in 2013 by ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Reed New Holland an imprint of New Holland Publishers (Australia) Pty Ltd Sydney • Auckland • London • Cape Town Many people have helped us since 1977 when we began writing the first edition of Garfield House 86–88 Edgware Road London W2 2EA United Kingdom Australian Native Plants. Some of these folk have regrettably passed on, others have moved 1/66 Gibbes Street Chatswood NSW 2067 Australia to different areas. We endeavour here to acknowledge their assistance, without which the 218 Lake Road Northcote Auckland New Zealand Wembley Square First Floor Solan Road Gardens Cape Town 8001 South Africa various editions of this book would not have been as useful to so many gardeners and lovers of Australian plants. www.newhollandpublishers.com To the following people, our sincere thanks: Steve Adams, Ralph Bailey, Natalie Barnett, www.newholland.com.au Tony Bean, Lloyd Bird, John Birks, Mr and Mrs Blacklock, Don Blaxell, Jim Bourner, John Copyright © 2013 in text: John Wrigley Briggs, Colin Broadfoot, Dot Brown, the late George Brown, Ray Brown, Leslie Conway, Copyright © 2013 in map: Ian Faulkner Copyright © 2013 in photographs and illustrations: Murray Fagg Russell and Sharon Costin, Kirsten Cowley, Lyn Craven (Petraeomyrtus punicea photograph) Copyright © 2013 New Holland Publishers (Australia) Pty Ltd Richard Cummings, Bert
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No
    Newsletter No. 167 June 2016 Price: $5.00 AUSTRALASIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Council President Vice President Darren Crayn Daniel Murphy Australian Tropical Herbarium (ATH) Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria James Cook University, Cairns Campus Birdwood Avenue PO Box 6811, Cairns Qld 4870 Melbourne, Vic. 3004 Australia Australia Tel: (+61)/(0)7 4232 1859 Tel: (+61)/(0) 3 9252 2377 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Leon Perrie John Clarkson Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 467, Wellington 6011 PO Box 975, Atherton Qld 4883 New Zealand Australia Tel: (+64)/(0) 4 381 7261 Tel: (+61)/(0) 7 4091 8170 Email: [email protected] Mobile: (+61)/(0) 437 732 487 Councillor Email: [email protected] Jennifer Tate Councillor Institute of Fundamental Sciences Mike Bayly Massey University School of Botany Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010 New Zealand Australia Tel: (+64)/(0) 6 356- 099 ext. 84718 Tel: (+61)/(0) 3 8344 5055 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Other constitutional bodies Hansjörg Eichler Research Committee Affiliate Society David Glenny Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Sarah Matthews Heidi Meudt Advisory Standing Committees Joanne Birch Financial Katharina Schulte Patrick Brownsey Murray Henwood David Cantrill Chair: Dan Murphy, Vice President Bob Hill Grant application closing dates Ad hoc adviser to Committee: Bruce Evans Hansjörg Eichler Research
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Or Purchasing Online At
    On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production OCTOBER 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production by Jonathan Lidbetter October 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-000509 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-328-4 ISSN 1440-6845 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production Publication No. 11/149 Project No. PRJ-000509 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Region
    Regional Services Division – South West Region South West Region ‐ Parks & Wildlife and FPC Disturbance Operations Flora and Vegetation Survey Assessment Form 1. Proposed Operations: (to be completed by proponent) NBX0217 Summary of Proposed Operation: Road Construction and Timber Harvesting New road construction – 3.75km Existing road upgrade – 14.9km New gravel pit construction – 2ha (exploration area) Contact Person and Contact Details: Adam Powell [email protected] 0427 191 332 Area of impact; District/Region, State Forest Block, Coupe/Compartment (shapefile to be provided): Blackwood District South West Region Barrabup 0317 Period of proposed disturbance: November 2016 to December 2017 1 2.Desktop Assessment: (to be completed by the Region) ‐ Check Forest Ecosystem reservation. Forest Ecosystems proposed for impact: Jarrah Forest‐Blackwood Plateau, Shrub, herb and sedgelands, Darling Scarp Y Are activities in a Forest Ecosystem that triggers informal reservation under the FMP? The Darling Scarp Forest Ecosystem is a Poorly Reserved Forest Ecosystem and needs to be protected as an Informal Reserve under the Forest Management Plan (Appendix 11) ‐ Check Vegetation Complexes, extents remaining uncleared and in reservation (DEC 2007/EPA 2006). Vegetation Complex Pre‐European extent (%) Pre‐European extent (Ha) Extent in formal/informal reservation (%) Bidella (BD) 94% 44,898 47% Darling Scarp (DS) Figures not available Corresponds to Darling Scarp Forest Ecosystem extent Gale (GA) 80% 899 17% Jalbarragup (JL) 91% 14,786 32% Kingia (KI) 96% 97,735 34% Telerah (TL) 92% 25,548 33% Wishart (WS2) 84% 2,796 35% Y Do any complexes trigger informal reservation under the FMP? Darling Scarp complex as discussed above Y Are any complexes significant as per EPA regionally significant vegetation? Gale (GA) complex is cleared below the recommended retention of 1,500ha (Molloy et.al 2007) ‐ Check Threatened flora and TEC/PEC databases over an appropriate radius of the disturbance boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Ne Wsletter No . 92
    AssociationAustralian of NativeSocieties Plants for Growing Society (Australia)Australian IncPlants Ref No. ISSN 0725-8755 Newsletter No. 92 – August 2012 GSG Vic Programme 2012 GSG SE Qld Programme 2012 Leader: Neil Marriott Morning tea at 9.30am, meetings commence at 693 Panrock Reservoir Rd, Stawell, Vic. 3380 10.00am. For more information contact Bryson Phone: 03 5356 2404 or 0458 177 989 Easton on (07) 3121 4480 or 0402242180. Email: [email protected] Sunday, 26 August Contact Neil for queries about program for the year. This meeting has been cancelled as many members Any members who would like to visit the official have another function to attend over the weekend. collection, obtain cutting material or seed, assist in its maintenance, and stay in our cottage for a few days The October 2012 meeting – has been are invited to contact Neil. After the massive rains at replaced by a joint excursion through SEQ & the end of 2010 and the start of 2011 the conditions northern NSW commencing on Wednesday, 7 are perfect for large scale replanting of the collection. November 2012. GSG members planning to attend Offers of assistance would be most welcome. are asked to contact Jan Glazebrook & Dennis Cox Newsletter No. 92 No. Newsletter on Ph (07) 5546 8590 for full details closer to this Friday, 29 September to Monday, 1 October event. See also page 3 for more details. SUBJECT: Spring Grevillea Crawl Sunday, 25 November FRI ARVO: Meet at Neil and Wendy Marriott’s Panrock VENUE: Home of Robyn Wieck Ridge, 693 Panrock Reservoir Rd, Stawell Lot 4 Ajuga Court, Brookvale Park Oakey for welcome and wander around the HONE (07) 4691 2940 gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey
    Shire of Dardanup Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey March 2015 Executive summary This report is subject to, and must be read in conjunction with, the limitations set out in Section 1.4 and the assumptions and qualifications contained throughout the Report. The Greater Bunbury Strategy and Structure Plan identified a potential significant urban expansion area located to the east of the Eaton locality and an industrial expansion area in Waterloo, in the Shire of Dardanup. The Shire of Dardanup (the Shire) and the Department of Planning have commenced preparation of District Structure Plans (DSP) for the urban expansion area and the industrial expansion area. The DSP will be informed by several technical studies including flora and fauna surveys. The Shire has commissioned GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) to undertake a flora and fauna survey and reporting for the Project. The Project Area is situated in the locality of Waterloo in the Shire of Dardanup. The Project Area includes the urban development area to the north of the South- west Highway (SWH) and the industrial development area to the south of the SWH. GHD undertook a desktop assessment of the Project Area and a flora and fauna field assessment with the first phase conducted from 13 to 14 August, 2014 and the second phase conducted from 29 to 31 October 2014. The purpose of this assessment was to identify the parts of the Project Area that have high, moderate and low ecological values so that the Shire can develop the DSP in consideration of these ecological values. This assessment identified the biological features of the Project Area and the key results are as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Orchidaceae: Genera and Species (12/1/2004)
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (21/1/2008) by Mark A. Clements Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P- H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name. Synonyms are also cross-referenced under genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Tracker 97
    Proprietor: Ashley Elliott 230 Tannery Lane Mandurang Victoria 3551 Telephone: (03) 5439 5384 PlantPlant CatalogueCatalogue Facsimile: (03) 5439 3618 E-mail: [email protected] Central & Northern Victoria's Indigenous Nursery Please contact the nursery to confirm stock availablity Non-Local Plants aneura Mulga or Yarran Acacia ramulosa Horse Mulga or Narrow Leaf Mulga Acacia aphylla Acacia redolens Acacia argrophylla Silver Mulga Acacia restiacea Acacia beckleri Barrier Range Wattle Acacia rhigiophylla Dagger-leaved Acacia Acacia cardiophylla Wyalong Wattle Acacia riceana Acacia chinchillensis Acacia rossei Acacia cliftoniana ssp congesta Acacia spectabilis Mudgee Wattle Acacia cognata River Wattle - low form Acacia spinescens Spiny Wattle Acacia cognata River or Bower Wattle Acacia spongilitica Acacia conferta Crowded-leaf Wattle Acacia squamata Bright Sedge Wattle Acacia convenyii Blue Bush Acacia stigmatophylla Acacia cultriformis Knife-leaf Wattle Acacia subcaerulea Acacia cupularis Coastal prostrate Acacia vestita Hairy Wattle Acacia cyclops Round-seeded Acacia Acacia victoriae Bramble Wattle or Elegant Wattle Acacia declinata Acacia wilhelmiana Dwarf Nealie Acacia decora Western Silver Wattle Acacia willdenowiana Leafless Wattle Acacia denticulosa Sandpaper Wattle Acacia caerulescens caerulescens Buchan Blue Acacia drummondii subsp Dwarf Drummond Wattle Acanthocladium dockeri Laura Daisy drummondii Actinodium cunninghamii Albany Daisy or Swamp Daisy Acacia elata Cedar Wattle Actinodium species (prostrate form) Acacia
    [Show full text]
  • Landcorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey
    LandCorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey October 2016 Executive summary Introduction Through the Royalties for Regions “Growing our South” initiative, the Shire of Denmark has received funding to provide a second crossing of the Denmark River, to upgrade approximately 6.5 km of local roads and to support the delivery of an industrial estate adjacent to McIntosh Road. GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by LandCorp to undertake a biological assessment of the project survey area. The purpose of the assessment was to identify and describe flora, vegetation and fauna within the survey area. The outcomes of the assessment will be used in the environmental assessment and approvals process and will identify the possible need for, and scope of, further field investigations will inform environmental impact assessment of the road upgrades. The survey area is approximately 68.5 ha in area and includes a broad area of land between Scotsdale Road and the Denmark River and the road reserve and adjacent land along East River Road and McIntosh Road between the Denmark Mt Barker Road and South Western Highway. A 200 m section north and south along the Denmark Mt Barker Road from East River Road was also surveyed. The biological assessment involved a desktop review and three separate field surveys, including a winter flora and fauna survey, spring flora and fauna survey and spring nocturnal fauna survey. Fauna surveys also included the use of movement sensitive cameras in key locations. Key biological aspects The key biological aspects and constraints identified for the survey area are summarised in the following table.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australian Wildlife Management Program No
    WESTERN AUSTRALIAN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM NO. 33 Declared Rare and Poorly Known Flora in the Central Forest Region by Kim Williams Andrew Horan Scott Wood Andrew Webb 2001 Department of Conservation and Land Management Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 1 Department of Conservation and Land Management Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 This study was partly funded by the Endangered Species Program of Environment Australia (ESP Project No. 440) Department of Conservation and Land Management Western Australia 2001 ISSN 0816-9713 Cover photograph: Grevillea maccutcheonii by Andrew Brown Editorial..................................................................................................... Kim Williams, Andrew Horan Editors and page preparation....................................................Kim Williams, Andrew Horan, Jill Pryde Maps....................................................................................................................................Kim Williams 2 FOREWORD Western Australian Wildlife Management Programs are a series of publications produced by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). The programs are prepared in addition to Regional Management Plans to provide detailed information and guidance for the management and protection of certain exploited or threatened species (e.g. Kangaroos, Noisy Scrub-bird and the Rose Mallee). This program provides a brief description of the appearance, distribution, habitat and conservation status of flora declared as
    [Show full text]