The Species Composition of Plant Mining Dipterous (Insecta: Diptera) of Greenhouse Surroundings in Lithuania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Species Composition of Plant Mining Dipterous (Insecta: Diptera) of Greenhouse Surroundings in Lithuania The species composition of plant mining dipterous (Insecta: Diptera) of greenhouse surroundings in Lithuania The species composition of plant mining dipterous (Insecta: Diptera) of greenhouse surroundings in Lithuania Henrikas Ostrauskas1, The greenhouse surroundings of 37 growers were tested for Liriomyza Saulius Pakalnikis2, bryoniae (Diptera: Agromyzidae) distribution in Lithuania. Plants as po- tential hosts for economically significant leaf miner pests were elucida- 1 Loreta Taluntytë ted and most frequent species of dipterous miners were determined. In 1 Lithuanian State Plant total, 119 species belonging to 7 families were indicated, and the hosts Protection Service, invaded 135 plant genera belonging to 40 families (20012002). The relative frequency of L. bryoniae was 38%, and this species attacked Pelesos 85, Cucumis sativa, Lycopersicon aesculentum, Solanum tuberosum, S. nig- LT-2014 Vilnius, Lithuania rum, Nicotiana affinis, Datura indica and Gypsophila paniculata in green- E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] house surrounding. The other available hosts for dipterous miners of 2 Institute of Ecology, economic importance were found as follows: Amaranthus, Antirrhinum, Vilnius University, Apium, Callistephus, Chenopodium, Dahlia, Galeopsis, Helianthus, La- Akademijos 2, mium, Linaria, Petunia, Sisymbrium, Surphinia and Tropaeolum. The spe- LT-2600 Vilnius, Lithuania cies Chromatomyia horticola, Liriomyza strigata, L. ptarmicae, L. conges- E-mail: [email protected] ta, L. sonchi, Phytomyza artemisivora, P. pullula (Agromyzidae), Trypeta artemisiae (Tephritidae) and Cystiphora sonchi (Cecidomyiidae) were most frequent dipterous leaf-miners in greenhouse environment, but only the first two could have the influence on crop growing in a closed system. The life histories of Ophiomyia bohemica and O. rostrata (Agromy- zidae) were confirmed for the first time; distribution data of five rare and three new to Lithuania Diptera species were supplemented. The further hosts of Chromatomyia horticola (Scaevola), Liriomyza eupatorii (Stachys), L. strigata (Cistus), Melanagromyza submetallescens (Lathyrus, Medicago) and Ophiomyia heracleivora (Chaerophyllum) were ascertai- ned. Also, unknown feeding behavior (no galls forming) of Melanagro- myza cunctans and stem rind mining of Liriomyza pisivora have been found. A hasted reactivation method for small insects is briefly presented. Key words: greenhouse, plant miners, host plant, bionomics, distribution INTRODUCTION houses. A settling of further quarantine species such as Liriomyza trifolii, L. huidobrensis or L. sativae is Liriomyza bryoniae (Kaltenbach, 1858) a quaranti- quite possible. The latest data (Ostrauskas, 2002) ne agromyzid species (Quarantine , 1997; Lietu- force us to take more care about this. vos , 2000) is known in Lithuania occurring free The aim of this work was to test the greenhouse (Pakalniki et al., 2000) as well as under greenhou- surroundings for Liriomyza bryoniae, to determine se conditions (Taluntytë, 2001; 2002). Greenhouses most frequent species of dipterous miners here, and are not strictly isolated from the nearest surroun- to elucidate plants as potential hosts for mining pests ding (absent are entomological nets or wind blinds) of economic importance. in Lithuania. Thus, leaf miners and other phytopha- gous insects occurring on wild plants have the pos- MATERIALS AND METHODS sibility to get into greenhouses and to attack the crops. On the other hand, when the temperature The investigation territory comprised direct surroun- reaches 40 °C, leaf miners can escape from green- dings of greenhouses, the neighbouring fields and ISSN 02357224. E k o l o g i j a (Vilnius). 2003. Nr. 3 3 Henrikas Ostrauskas, Saulius Pakalnikis, Loreta Taluntytë gardens, ornamental plots (decoration bar), peat in situ, and the plants were identified at the site. banks, compost lots and outskirts. Surroundings of Some plant parts with larvae were delivered to the 10 greenhouses (Liriomyza bryoniae focus of 2000) laboratory to dipterous imago stage exterminate the- were tested in 2001. Four of them were investiga- re. Male genitalia were mounted, special keys and ted in 2002 repeatedly together with surroundings descriptions (Beiger, 1978; 1989; Èernô, 1994; Sasa- of 27 further greenhouses (15 L. bryoniae foci of kawa, 1961; Spencer, 1964; 1966; 1973; 1976; 1990; 2001 including). were used. A survey was done once per year in JulyAu- Also, some additional material by S. Pakalnikis gust, with additional attention to cultivated, intro- collected earlier and deposited at the Institute of duced or adventive foreign plants. In total, 41 sur- Ecology (Vilnius) was used. veys of 37 growers in 2001 and 2002 were carried Hasted reactivation method. Dipterous, whose out to test the surroundings of 25 foci of L. bryo- imagos did not emerge at the laboratory up to the niae and 12 greenhouses without the pest indicated first days of October, have been considered to win- before (Fig. 1). All regions of Lithuanian State Plant ter diapause fallen. Tubes containing these insects Protection Service have been embraced. were taken to the open air and kept in a box, in The majority of insect species were determined the shade, under natural conditions. There were two according to the mining features exhibited by larvae meteorological limits fixed in the storage. A first Fig. 1. Districts of Lithuania investigated in 20012002. ­ Liriomyza bryoniae in greenhouse surroundings detected; finding spots of rare dipterous species (with former data included): £ Cystiphora taraxaci, ¯ Chromatomyia centaurii, Liriomyza bulgarica, © Melanagromyza tschirnhausi, ² Ophiomyia rostrata, Phytomyza conyzae 1 pav. Lietuvos rajonai, tirti 20012002 metais. * Liriomyza bryoniae radvietës ðiltnamiø aplinkoje bei retøjø dvisparniø rûðiø radvietës (áskaitant ankstesnius duo- menis) 4 The species composition of plant mining dipterous (Insecta: Diptera) of greenhouse surroundings in Lithuania fall of air temperature to 10 °C (usually in No- Table 1 (continued) vember) means the end of reactivation. A first thaw 1 lentelë (tæsinys) to 0 °C (usually in December) means the day of safe return of the insects to the laboratory. Then 1234 they were kept as follows: at about +5 °C (one Angelica W4 day), +1015 °C (next two days) and at about Anthriscus W2 +20 °C up to insect expupation. In this way we can Apium C2 avoid the almost inevitable loss of material in a Chaerophyllum W2 refrigerator, where small dipterous are threatened Daucus C and W 2 by danger to be dried up as soon as in some days. Heracleum W3 And the emergence we have in January (leaf mi- Peucedanum W1 ners) to late March (stem miners). The method was Pimpinella W3 Selinum W1 a result of experiments with Agromyzidae and has Torilis W1 been in use for 20 years. Asteraceae Achillea W3 Anthemis W2 RESULTS Arctium W4 Artemisia W7 Host plants Bellis C2 Bidens W1 Liriomyza bryoniae was found on the following hosts: Callistephus C3 1) Cucumis sativa grown in fields near greenhou- Carduus W3 ses by 4 growers for individual purposes (3 cases of Centaurea W2 Chamomilla W2 them in focus surroundings) and 1 industrial grower; Chrysanthemum C3 2) Lycopersicon aesculentum, in industrial field Cichorium W2 (1 grower, focus surroundings), in vegetable garden Cirsium W8 (1 industrial grower, focus surroundings, and 1 gro- Crepis W1 wer for individual purposes) and in the outskirts (1 Dahlia C2 industrial grower, focus surroundings); Erigeron W2 3) Nicotiana affinis, in a field (1 industrial gro- Eupatorium W1 wer); Galinsoga W2 Helenium C1 4) Datura indica, in a garden (1 industrial gro- Helianthus C1 wer and 1 grower for individual purposes, both fo- Hypochoeris W1 cus surroundings); Inula C1 5) Solanum nigrum, near an industrial greenhou- Lactuca W2 se (1 case, focus surroundings); Lapsana W2 6) Solanum tuberosum, in the fields (2 industrial Leontodon W3 growers); Leucanthemum W2 7) Gypsophila paniculata, near a greenhouse (1 Matricaria W3 Mycelis W1 industrial grower). Picris W3 In total, plants of 135 genera belonging to 40 Rudbeckia C2 families were found to host various Diptera miners Solidago W1 (Table 1). The representatives of three genera (all Senecio W2 Sonchus W10 Tagetes C2 Table 1. The host plant list of dipterous miners found Tanacetum C and W 5 in greenhouse surroudings in 20012002 Taraxacum W4 1 lentelë. Dvisparniø minuotojø augalø ðeimininkø ðilt- Tragopogon W1 namiø aplinkoje 20012002 metais sàraðas Tussilago W4 Zinnia C2 Number Balsaminaceae Impatiens W1 Status, of the Betulaceae Betula W1 Plant family Genus cultural (C) / mining Boraginaceae Anchusa W2 wild (W) dipterous Echium W2 species Myosotis C and W 2 Symphytum W1 1234 Brassicaceae Armoracia C2 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus C1 Barbarea W1 Apiaceae Aegopodium W1 Brassica C2 5 Henrikas Ostrauskas, Saulius Pakalnikis, Loreta Taluntytë Table 1 (continued) Table 1 (continued) 1 lentelë (tæsinys) 1 lentelë (tæsinys) 1234 1234 Capsella W2Rubiaceae Galium W2 Erucastrum W1Rutaceae Ruta C1 Erysimum W3Salicaceae Populus W2 Raphanus C and W 4 Scrophulariaceae Anthirrhinum W1 Roripa W2 Chaenorrhinum C1 Sinapis W4 Linaria W2 Sisymbrium W1 Veronica W1 Thlaspi W1Solanaceae Datura C2 Campanulaceae Campanula W2 Lycopersicon C2 Jasione W1 Nicotiana C2 Cappareceae Cleome C2 Petunia C2 Caprifoliaceae Sambucus W1 Solanum C and W 1 Caryophyllaceae Gypsophila C3 Surphinia C1 Cerastium W1Tropaeolaceae Tropaeolum C2 Saponaria W1Urticaceae Urtica W2 Silene W3Valerianaceae Valeriana W1 Stellaria W2Violaceae Viola W1 Chenopodiaceae
Recommended publications
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- Tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää
    20 © Sahlbergia Vol. 12: 20–32, 2007 Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää Winqvist, K. & Kahanpää, J. 2007: Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Diptera: Brachycera). — Sahlbergia 12:20-32, Helsinki, Finland, ISSN 1237-3273. Another part of the updated checklist of Finnish flies is presented. This part covers the families Lonchaeidae, Pallopteridae, Piophilidae, Platystomatidae, Tephritidae, Ulididae, Coelopidae, Dryomyzidae, Heterocheilidae, Phaeomyii- dae, Sciomyzidae and Sepsidae. Eight species are recorded from Finland for the first time. The following ten species have been erroneously reported from Finland and are here deleted from the Finnish checklist: Chaetolonchaea das- yops (Meigen, 1826), Earomyia crystallophila (Becker, 1895), Lonchaea hirti- ceps Zetterstedt, 1837, Lonchaea laticornis Meigen, 1826, Prochyliza lundbecki (Duda, 1924), Campiglossa achyrophori (Loew, 1869), Campiglossa irrorata (Fallén, 1814), Campiglossa tessellata (Loew, 1844), Dioxyna sororcula (Wie- demann, 1830) and Tephritis nigricauda (Loew, 1856). The Finnish records of Lonchaeidae: Lonchaea bruggeri Morge, Lonchaea contigua Collin, Lonchaea difficilis Hackman and Piophilidae: Allopiophila dudai (Frey) are considered dubious. The total number of species of Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea found from Finland is now 262. Kaj Winqvist, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Email: [email protected] Jere Kahanpää, Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland. Email: kahanpaa@iki.fi Introduction new millennium there was no concentrated The last complete checklist of Finnish Dipte- Finnish effort to study just these particular ra was published in Hackman (1980a, 1980b). groups. Consequently, before our work the Recent checklists of Finnish species have level of knowledge on Finnish fauna in these been published for ‘lower Brachycera’ i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Pristop K Obvladovanju Prenamnožitev Lazarjev Iz Rodu Arion
    Zbornik predavanj in referatov 13. Slovenskega posvetovanje o varstvu rastlin z mednarodno udeležbo Rimske Toplice, 7.-8. marec 2017 ZAČASEN ZNAČAJ KARANTENSKE KATEGORIJE NA ZGLEDU PLODOVIH MUH (Tephritidae) Vlasta KNAPIČ1, Gabrijel SELJAK2 1Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in prehrano, Uprava RS za varno hrano, veterinarstvo in varstvo rastlin, Ljubljana 2 Kmetijsko gozdarski zavod Nova Gorica IZVLEČEK Plodove muhe so med najpomembnejšimi škodljivci v pridelavi sadja in zelenjave na svetu. Opisanih je nad 4000 vrst. Mnoge so polifagne. Družina Tephritidae ima kar 500 rodov, ki imajo vsak svoje domorodno območje. Med gospodarsko najpomembnejše rodove spadajo: Anastrepha (domorodne vrste pretežno v Južni in Srednji Ameriki), Bactrocera (Bližnji vzhod in območje Avstralazije), Ceratitis (tropska Afrika) in Rhagoletis (domorodne vrste v zmerno toplem pasu Amerike, Evrope in Azije). Mnoge vrste iz teh rodov so tudi invazivne in povzročajo veliko škodo ob vnosu na nova območja, kar se zaradi mednarodne trgovine dogaja vse pogosteje. Po tej poti so se k nam verjetno vnesle breskova muha (Ceratitis capitata), oljkova muha (Bactrocera oleae), višnjeva muha (Rhagoletis cingulata) in orehova 254 muha (Rh. completa). Od skoraj 200 znanih škodljivih vrst plodovih muh pa jih večina še ni zastopanih v Evropi, zato jih je mogoče obdržati na karantenski listi in predpisati uvozne zahteve za plodove, s katerimi se v EU lahko vnesejo. V prispevku so opisane regulirane vrste plodovih muh v Sloveniji in v Evropski uniji za obdobje 1977 do 2017 in posebnosti pri tem preventivnem ukrepu varstva rastlin. Ključne besede: plodove muhe, Tephritidae, karantenski ukrepi, uvoz, zdravje rastlin ABSTRACT TEMPORARY NATURE OF QUARANTINE PEST CATEGORIES USING THE EXAMPLE OF THE Tephritidae FRUIT FLIES Globally, fruit flies belong to the most significant pests in the production of fruits and vegetables.
    [Show full text]
  • TVERC.18.371 TVERC Office Biodiversity Report
    Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre Sharing environmental information in Berkshire and Oxfordshire BIODIVERSITY REPORT Site: TVERC Office TVERC Ref: TVERC/18/371 Prepared for: TVERC On: 05/09/2018 By: Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre 01865 815 451 [email protected] www.tverc.org This report should not to be passed on to third parties or published without prior permission of TVERC. Please be aware that printing maps from this report requires an appropriate OS licence. TVERC is hosted by Oxfordshire County Council TABLE OF CONTENTS The following are included in this report: GENERAL INFORMATION: Terms & Conditions Species data statements PROTECTED & NOTABLE SPECIES INFORMATION: Summary table of legally protected and notable species records within 1km search area Summary table of Invasive species records within 1km search area Species status key Data origin key DESIGNATED WILDLIFE SITE INFORMATION: A map of designated wildlife sites within 1km search area Descriptions/citations for designated wildlife sites Designated wildlife sites guidance HABITAT INFORMATION: A map of section 41 habitats of principal importance within 1km search area A list of habitats and total area within the search area Habitat metadata TVERC is hosted by Oxfordshire County Council TERMS AND CONDITIONS The copyright for this document and the information provided is retained by Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre. The copyright for some of the species data will be held by a recording group or individual recorder. Where this is the case, and the group or individual providing the data in known, the data origin will be given in the species table. TVERC must be acknowledged if any part of this report or data derived from it is used in a report.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Species Observed Along the Riverbank Between GARRICK's
    HURST PARK 15th and 17th August 2015 ‐ list of species observed along the riverbank between GARRICK’S AIT ‐ TAGG’S ISLAND PLANTS Hirschfeldia incana common Acer negundo near tow path, car park area Hypericum perforatum local Acer platanoides young trees Hypericum x inodorum? Frequent along Acer pseudoplatanus trees & saplings along riverbank river bank Hypochaeris radicata near car park Achillea millefolium frequent Ilex aquifolium sapling Aesculus hippocastanum trees & saplings Impatiens glandulifera local by riverbank Agrimonia eupatoria a few Iris pseudacorus river bank, local Alliaria petiolata scattered Lactuca serriola near car park Allium vineale a few Lamium album occasional Alnus glutinosa trees, riverbank Lathyrus pratensis frequent Anthriscus sylvestris scattered Ligustrum ovalifolium sapling on riverbank Arctium minus scattered Lolium pratense common Artemisia vulgaris scattered Lotus corniculatus occasional Arum maculatum few Lycopus europaeus local Ballota nigra fairly frequent Lythrum salicaria local Bellis perennis scattered Malus domestica small tree Betula pendula near tow path, car park area Malva moschata scarce, by river bank Buddleia davidii a few Malva sylvestris occasional Calystegia sepium sensu stricto frequent Medicago arabica scattered Capsella bursa‐pastoris scarce Medicago lupulina scattered Carex sp. (no flower spikes) river bank Melilotus sp. (no flowers, needs checking) Centaurea nigra frequent Odontites verna local Chenopodium album scattered Oenanthe crocata riverbank, local/frequent Cirsium arvense
    [Show full text]
  • Tephritid Flies Recording Scheme June 2020
    TEPHRITID FLIES RECORDING SCHEME JUNE 2020 Since the last note (Bulletin of the Dipterists Forum 84: pp. 8-10), based on data from England, Wales and Scotland, the British Tephritidae Recording Scheme database has continued to grow and a further summary is provided for records ascertained to the end of 2019. COVERAGE 1878 hectads throughout the region. 2 Number of species 1 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 1 16 - 20 21 - 25 26 - 30 31 - 35 36 - 40 0 41 - 45 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATA For the majority of species the data are presented as the total number of hectads from all date classes (pre 1920 or date unknown, 1920-1939, 1940-1959, 1960-1979, 1980-1999 and 2000-2019) with the numbers in brackets showing ‘new’ hectads during the respective periods. Dithryca guttularis (Meigen, 1826). 178, 21, 10 (10), 2 (2), 11 (10), 93 (85), 71 (50). Myopites eximius Séguy, 1932. 45, 3, 3 (3), 2 (1), 1 (0), 22 (18), 36 (20). Myopites inulaedyssentericae Blot, 1827. 126, 5, 4 (4), 3 (2), 2 (2), 60 (53), 97 (60). Urophora cardui (Linnaeus, 1758). 485, 25, 17 (10), 15 (7), 26 (19), 254 (217), 382 (207). Urophora cuspidata (Meigen, 1826). 40, 0, 2 (2), 2 (2), 3 (2), 19 (18), 22 (16). Urophora jaceana (Hering, 1935). 698, 43, 22 (17), 14 (9), 50 (47), 362 (325), 397 (257). Urophora quadrifasciata (Meigen, 1826). 294, 12, 15 (10), 13 (8), 5 (3), 115 (107), 219 (154). Urophora solstitialis (Linnaeus, 1758).
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207
    Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2. Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 122 5.1.4. Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.1. Tabelle Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 84 Autumn 2017 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 84 Autumn 2017 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Rob Wolton Vice Chairman Howard Bentley Secretary Amanda Morgan Meetings Treasurer Phil Brighton Please use the Booking Form downloadable from our website Membership Sec. John Showers Field Meetings Field Meetings Sec. vacancy Now organised by several different contributors, contact the Secretary. Indoor Meetings Sec. Martin Drake Publicity Officer Erica McAlister Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Conservation Officer vacant Martin Drake [email protected] Ordinary Members Bulletin contributions Stuart Ball, Malcolm Smart, Peter Boardman, Victoria Burton, Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Tony Irwin, Martin Harvey, Chris Raper Dipterists Bulletin Editor Unelected Members Darwyn Sumner 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Tel. 0116 212 5075 [email protected] Secretary Assistant Editor Amanda Morgan Judy Webb Pennyfields, Rectory Road, Middleton, Saxmundham, Suffolk, IP17 3NW 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. [email protected] Tel. 01865 377487 [email protected] Treasurer Phil Brighton [email protected] Dipterists Digest contributions Deposits for DF organised field meetings to be sent to the Treasurer Dipterists Digest Editor Conservation Peter Chandler Robert Wolton (interim contact, whilst the post remains vacant) 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL Tel. 01225-708339 Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ [email protected] Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.3 ES Appendix
    Environmental Statement Appendix 9 .C (6.3.9.3) Invertebrate Survey Report April 2016 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK Page 2 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 Commissioned by Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd 3rd Floor Manning House 22 Carlisle Place SW1P 1JA INVERTEBRATE SURVEY REPORT Report number BS/2864/14 January 2015 Prepared by Colin Plant Associates (UK) Consultant Entomologists 14 West Road Bishops Stortford Hertfordshire CM23 3QP 01279-507697 [email protected] Page 3 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colin Plant Associates (UK) are pleased to credit the input of the following in-house personnel: Field work for this project has been undertaken by Marcel Ashby Tristan Bantock Colin W. Plant Identification of samples has been undertaken by many parties, prominent amongst which are Marcel Ashby Tristan Bantock Norman F. Hall* Edward Milner* Colin W. Plant Derek (“Del”) Smith* *denotes an external expert Page 4 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 7 Glossary of Terms .................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I Terists I Est
    i terists i est No.2 1989\ Dipterists Digest is a popular journal aimed primarily at field diplerists In the UK. Ireland and adjacent countries, with Interests In recording. ecology, natural history. conservation and Identification of British and NW European files. Articles may be of any length up to 3000 words Items exceeding this length may be serialised or printed In full. depending on the competition for space. They should be in clear concise English. preferably typed double spaced on one side of A4 paper. Only scientific names should be underlined. Tables should be on separate sheets. Figures drawn in clear black Ink. about twice their printed size and letlered clearly. Enquiries about photographs and colour plates - please contact the Producllon Editor In advance as a charge may be made. References should follow the layout in thiS issue. Initially the scope of Dipterists Digest will be:­ Observations of interesting behaViour. ecology. and natural history New and improved techniques (e.g. collecting. rearing etc.). The conservation of flies and their habitats. Provisional and interim reports from the Diplera Recording Schemes, Including provisional and preliminary maps Records of new or scarce species for regions, counties. districts etc. Local faunal accounts, field meeting results. and 'holiday lists' with good ecological information/interpretation. Notes on identification, additions. deletions and amendments to standard key works and checklists. News of new publications/references/literature scan Texts concerned with the Diptera of parts of continental Europe adjacent to the British Isles will also be considered for publication, if submitted in English. Editorial Panel 1988/89 Peter Chandler, Weston Research Labs.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Evidence Concerning Ragwort Impacts, Ecology and Control Options
    Review of evidence concerning ragwort impacts, ecology and control options Report to Defra OCTOBER 2013 Authors: Ruth Laybourn, Debbie Kessell, Naomi Jones, Simon Conyers, Caroline Hallam, Nigel Boatman Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 1 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Ragwort is a widespread native plant in the UK, which occurs in a range of habitats including those used for grazing livestock and hay or silage production, and is of concern because it contains pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) which are toxic to livestock. Problems have occurred particularly with poisoning of horses. Ragwort is a specified weed in the Weeds Act 1959, under which land owners can be required to take all reasonable steps to prevent spread on their land and onto adjoining land. Defra have issued a Code of Practice on How to Prevent the Spread of Ragwort, which was published in 2004 (revised 2007) (Defra, 2007). In order to ensure that guidance continues to be based on the latest and best evidence, the work reported here was commissioned by Defra with the following objectives: o Review and update the evidence base on the impacts of ragwort on livestock, methods of control and the cost, benefits and impacts of control; o Investigate experience of ragwort problems, policy and control in other countries o Make suggestions relating to the Code of Practice and further research needs. Biology and ecology Studies of Ragwort ecology and distribution have shown that: Ragwort is found in a wide range of habitats but requires bare ground or disturbance to establish. Ragwort plants form a rosette in their first year and typically flower, set seed and die in the second year, though in some situations they can be longer lived.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Evidence Concerning Ragwort Impacts, Ecology and Control Options
    Review of evidence concerning ragwort impacts, ecology and control options Report to Defra OCTOBER 2013 Authors: Ruth Laybourn, Debbie Kessell, Naomi Jones, Simon Conyers, Caroline Hallam, Nigel Boatman Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 1 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Ragwort is a widespread native plant in the UK, which occurs in a range of habitats including those used for grazing livestock and hay or silage production, and is of concern because it contains pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) which are toxic to livestock. Problems have occurred particularly with poisoning of horses. Ragwort is a specified weed in the Weeds Act 1959, under which land owners can be required to take all reasonable steps to prevent spread on their land and onto adjoining land. Defra have issued a Code of Practice on How to Prevent the Spread of Ragwort, which was published in 2004 (revised 2007) (Defra, 2007). In order to ensure that guidance continues to be based on the latest and best evidence, the work reported here was commissioned by Defra with the following objectives: o Review and update the evidence base on the impacts of ragwort on livestock, methods of control and the cost, benefits and impacts of control; o Investigate experience of ragwort problems, policy and control in other countries o Make suggestions relating to the Code of Practice and further research needs. Biology and ecology Studies of Ragwort ecology and distribution have shown that: Ragwort is found in a wide range of habitats but requires bare ground or disturbance to establish. Ragwort plants form a rosette in their first year and typically flower, set seed and die in the second year, though in some situations they can be longer lived.
    [Show full text]