Distributed Solute Transport Modelling in the Fyrisån Catchment in Sweden

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distributed Solute Transport Modelling in the Fyrisån Catchment in Sweden INSTITUT FÜR HYDROLOGIE ALBERT-LUDWIGS-UNIVERSITÄT FREIBURG I.BR. Sebastian Wrede Distributed Solute Transport Modelling in the Fyrisån Catchment in Sweden Diplomarbeit unter Leitung von Prof. Dr. Ch. Leibundgut Freiburg i. Br., März 2005 INSTITUT FÜR HYDROLOGIE ALBERT-LUDWIGS-UNIVERSITÄT FREIBURG I.BR. Sebastian Wrede Distributed Solute Transport Modelling in the Fyrisån Catchment in Sweden Referent: Prof. Dr. Ch. Leibundgut Koreferent: Dr. J. Lange Diplomarbeit unter Leitung von Prof. Dr. Ch. Leibundgut Freiburg i. Br., März 2005 How could drops of water know themselves to be a river? Yet the river flows on Antoine de Saint-Exupéry Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors Dr. Jan Seibert and Prof. Dr. Stefan Uhlenbrook. They were always patient to answer my various questions and supported my work in numerous ways. The motivation and scientific advice given by Prof. Dr. Uhlenbrook during my time at the University in Freiburg and my visit in Delft encouraged me throughout the scientific work of this thesis. Dr. Seibert provided continuous support and constructive comments during my time at Stockholm University. My thanks go as well to my referent Prof. Dr. Christian Leibundgut and my coreferent Dr. Jens Lange for giving me the opportunity to write this thesis in close cooperation with the University of Stockholm. Finally I would like to thank several persons for their contribution to this thesis: Steve Lyon, Thomas Grabs, Ingo Heidbüchel, Helen Dahlke, Jennie Tjernell, Linda Gren, Anne Wildfang, Christoph, Claire and Bernhard Wrede for supporting me in different ways throughout my diploma time. Your help was really appreciated. Funding for residence in Sweden was partly provided by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and is gratefully acknowledged. Sebastian Wrede Contents I Contents Contents..................................................................................................................................... I List of figures ......................................................................................................................... IV List of tables ........................................................................................................................... VI Notations................................................................................................................................VII Abstract .................................................................................................................................. XI Zusammenfassung .............................................................................................................. XIII 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................1 1.1. Objectives ...................................................................................................................3 1.2. Procedure....................................................................................................................4 2. Background.......................................................................................................................5 2.1. Nitrogen sources and transformation..........................................................................5 2.1.1. Nitrogen leakage from the terrestrial system......................................................5 2.1.2. Nitrogen sources and retention in the aquatic system ........................................8 2.1.3. Link to catchment characteristics .....................................................................10 2.2. Models for nitrogen transport simulations................................................................10 3. The Fyrisån catchment...................................................................................................14 3.1. Morphology, topography and land use.....................................................................14 3.2. Climate .....................................................................................................................16 3.3. Hydrology.................................................................................................................17 3.4. Chemistry .................................................................................................................18 4. Model development ........................................................................................................19 4.1. Software framework .................................................................................................19 4.1.1. PCRaster ...........................................................................................................19 4.1.2. PEST.................................................................................................................19 4.2. Hydrological model ..................................................................................................20 4.2.1. Basic model concept.........................................................................................20 4.2.2. Regionalisation of climatic input variables ......................................................22 4.2.3. Snow accumulation and melt............................................................................22 4.2.4. Urban runoff.....................................................................................................24 4.2.5. Soil moisture accounting ..................................................................................24 4.2.6. Runoff generation.............................................................................................27 4.2.7. Sub-grid variability...........................................................................................32 4.2.8. Channel routing and lakes ................................................................................34 4.2.9. Water management...........................................................................................35 4.2.10. Run-time performance enhancements of the model.........................................35 4.2.11. Verification.......................................................................................................36 4.2.12. Parameterisation ...............................................................................................36 4.2.13. Evaluation model and objective functions .......................................................38 4.3. Solute transport model..............................................................................................38 4.3.1. Basic model concept.........................................................................................38 4.3.2. Modelling nitrogen transport............................................................................40 4.3.3. Modelling terrestrial leakage............................................................................41 4.3.4. Modelling retention..........................................................................................42 II Contents 4.3.5. Verification ...................................................................................................... 44 4.3.6. Parameterisation............................................................................................... 45 5. Data base......................................................................................................................... 46 5.1. Spatial data............................................................................................................... 48 5.1.1. Digital elevation model.................................................................................... 48 5.1.2. River network and local drainage network ...................................................... 48 5.1.3. Land use........................................................................................................... 49 5.2. Meteorological and hydrological data...................................................................... 49 5.3. Chemistry data......................................................................................................... 51 5.3.1. Non-point source emissions............................................................................. 51 5.3.2. Point source emissions..................................................................................... 53 5.3.3. Water chemistry monitoring network .............................................................. 54 5.4. The Fyrisån data base............................................................................................... 54 6. Synoptic sampling campaign ........................................................................................ 56 6.1. Basic concept........................................................................................................... 56 6.2. Experimental details................................................................................................. 57 6.2.1. Rational for the location of sample sites.......................................................... 57 6.2.2. Sampling .......................................................................................................... 59 6.2.3. Laboratory analysis.......................................................................................... 60 6.2.4. Calculation of runoff and loads........................................................................ 60 6.2.5. Sourcesheds and land use
Recommended publications
  • Förslag Om Regionalt Cykelnät I Uppsala
    Förslag till Regionalt cykelnät i Uppsala län Uppsala Cykelförening 2017-10-12 Tack till Som underlag till analysen har använts Open Streetmap för översikt av vägar och cykelvägar, och projektdokument från Trafikverket för beslutade men inte färdiga cykelvägar. Trafik- och väguppgifter från NVDB (Nationell vägdatabas) har använts för att bedöma cykelbarhet på befintlig väg, bland annat översiktligt sammanställt via tjänsten Roadfinder (roadfinder.se). Många medlemmar i UCF har kommit med förslag om länkar i cykelnätet. Vi har också skickat ut förslaget till cykelklubbar och bygdeföreningar i länet och fått flera värdefulla svar, och använt det material som kommuner i länet sammanställt inför länstransportplaner. Vi vill bland annat tacka Randonneur Stockholm, Idé- och utvecklingsgruppen i Karlholmsbruk och Kickans hälsohörna i Tärnsjö för bra tips och lokalkännedom. Bakgrundskartor © Open streetmap med bidragsgivare. Bilder © Per Eric Rosén om ingen annan fotograf anges. Omslagsbild: Från cykelvägen Vegby-Landeryd Regional gång- och cykelväg i Ringe, Danmark Uppsala Cykelförening - Förslag till plan för Regionalt cykelnät i Uppsala län 2017-10-07 1/50 Tack till 1 Varför ett regionalt cykelnät? 3 Syfte och avgränsning 5 Möjligheter med cykel 5 Principer bakom förslagen 8 Prioritering av sträckor 8 Typer av cykelvägar 11 Förslag per stråk 15 Uppsala-Knutby 15 Förbindelse till Fjällnora 16 Faringe-Norrtälje på banvall 17 Gåvsta-Hallstavik 18 Uppsala-Öregrund 19 Rasbokil-Gåvsta 20 Kustlinjen Älvkarleby-Hallstavik 21 Uppsala-Skyttorp-Örbyhus-Gävle
    [Show full text]
  • Statistik Om Uppsala Kommun 2020
    Statistik om Uppsala kommun 2020 Landareal 2 182 km2 Folkmängd 230 767 varav 116 434 kvinnor och 114 333 män 1 Befolkning i Uppsala kommun 2019 Folkmängd efter ålder 2018 % 2019 % Ålder Antal Antal 0 2 612 1,2 2 597 1,1 1–5 13 268 5,9 13 533 5,9 6 2 658 1,2 2 673 1,1 7–9 8 013 3,6 8 184 3,5 10–12 7 693 3,4 7 984 3,5 13–15 7 164 3,2 7 420 3,2 16–18 6 892 3,1 7 098 3,1 19 2 590 1,2 2 744 1,2 20–24 19 521 8,7 19 973 8,7 25–44 67 903 30,2 69 983 30,3 45–64 49 181 21,8 49 944 21,6 65–79 28 578 12,7 29 229 12,7 80– 9 091 4,0 9 405 4,1 Totalt 225 164 100 230 767 100 Årlig folkökning i Uppsala kommun Folkmängdens förändringar Antal 2018 2019 Folkökning 5 250 5 603 Födda 2 608 2 597 Döda 1 468 1 455 Födelseöverskott 1 140 1 142 Inflyttade 16 219 16 647 Utflyttade 12 129 12 246 Flyttningsnetto 4 090 4 401 därav med utlandet 2 320 2 062 2 3 Personer med utländsk bakgrund* Folkmängd i stadsdelar i Uppsala tätort* 2018 2019 2018 2019 Samtliga 60 798 64 550 Luthagen 14 104 14 194 Kvinnor 30 253 31 993 Sala backe 11 204 11 411 Män 30 545 32 557 Gottsunda 8 635 8 729 Gränby 7 472 7 920 Därav från de tio vanligaste bakgrundsländerna (per år 2019) Kapellgärdet 7 169 7 493 2018 2019 Fålhagen 7 417 7 383 Syrien 4 839 5 267 Flogsta-Ekeby 7 037 7 204 Irak 5 039 5 236 Centrum 7 250 7 195 Iran 5 067 5 191 Eriksberg 7 154 7 144 Finland 4 605 4 579 Kungsängen 5 597 6 683 Turkiet 2 673 2 781 Sunnersta 6 241 6 277 Afghanistan 1 685 2 051 Främre Luthagen-Fjärdingen 5 906 6 018 Tyskland 1 814 1 861 Årsta 5 970 5 997 Eritrea 1 477 1 800 Stenhagen 5 715 5 682 Bangladesh 1 391 1 614 Svartbäcken 5 553 5 491 Kina 1 452 1 614 Sävja 5 126 5 309 Valsätra 5 179 5 232 * Utrikes född eller född i Sverige med båda föräldrarna födda utomlands.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Landscape and Between Worlds
    In the Landscape and Between Worlds ronze age settlements and burials in the Swedish provinces around Lakes Mälaren and Hjälmaren yield few Bbronze objects and fewer of the era’s fine stone battle axes. Instead, these things were found by people working on wetland reclamation and stream dredging for about a century up to the Second World War. Then the finds stopped because of changed agricultural practices. The objects themselves have received much study. Not so with the sites where they were deposited. This book reports on a wide- ranging landscape-archaeological survey of Bronze Age deposition sites, with the aim to seek general rules in the placement of sites. How did a person choose the appropriate site to deposit a socketed axe in 800 bc? The author has investigated known sites on foot and from his desk, using a wide range of archive materials, maps and shoreline displacement data that have only recently come on-line. Over 140 sites are identified closely enough to allow characterisation of their Bronze Age landscape contexts. Numerous recurring traits emerge, forming a basic predictive or heuristic model. Bronze Age deposi- tion sites, the author argues, are a site category that could profitably be placed on contract archaeology’s agenda during infrastructure projects. Archaeology should seek these sites, not wait for others to report on finding them. martin rundkvist is an archaeologist who received his doctorate from Stockholm University in 2003. He has published research into all the major periods of Sweden’s post-glacial past. Rundkvist teaches prehistory at Umeå University, edits the journal Fornvännen and keeps the internationally popular Aardvarchaeology blog.
    [Show full text]
  • Vad Är Det Som Ska Utvecklas? – En Studie Av Två Kommuners Arbete Med Landsbygdsutveckling
    Fakulteten för naturresurser och jordbruksvetenskap Vad är det som ska utvecklas? – En studie av två kommuners arbete med landsbygdsutveckling What will be developed? – A study of two municipalities work with rural development Linn Eriksson Institutionen för stad och land Kandidatarbete • 15 hp Agronomprogrammet – landsbygdsutveckling Uppsala 2017 Vad är det som ska utvecklas? - En studie av två kommuners arbete med landsbygdsutveckling What will be developed? - A study of two municipalities work with rural development Linn Eriksson Handledare: Kjell Hansen, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institution en för stad och land Examinator: Malin Beckman, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för stad och land Omfattning: 15 hp Nivå: Grundnivå, G2F Kurstitel: Självständigt arbete i landsbygdsutveckling Kurskod: EX0523 Program/Utbildning: Agronomprogrammet - landsbygdsutveckling Utgivningsort: Uppsala Publiceringsår: 2017 Upphovsrätt: Samtliga bilder i arbetet publiceras med tillstånd från upphovsrättsinnehavaren Elektronisk publicering: http://stud.epsilon.slu.se Nyckelord: Landsbygdsutveckling, byråkrati, policy, implementering, planering Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Fakulteten för naturresurser och jordbruksvetenskap Institutionen för stad och land - Organisation? sade hon. Vi söker ingen organisation. Det som är organiskt behöver inte organiseras. Ni bygger utifrån, vi byggs inifrån. Ni bygger med er själva som stenar och faller sönder utifrån och in. Vi byggs inifrån som träd, och det växer ut broar mellan oss som inte är av död materia och dött tvång. Från oss går det levande ut. I er går det livlösa in. Karin Boye, Kallocain 1940 1 Sammanfattning Är landsbygdsutveckling samma sak överallt? Den här kandidatupp- satsen som är gjord inom ämnet landsbygdsutveckling visar på hur två kommuner, med olika förutsättningar, arbetar med landsbygdsutveckl- ing. Studien är gjord som en jämförelse mellan Haparanda och Upp- sala kommun, dels genom studier av dokument och dels genom kvali- tativa intervjuer.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual and Sustainability Report 2018
    Annual Report 2018 with Sustainability Report Contents General One of Sweden’s largest private property companies .... 1 The year in brief ...........................................................................2 Page Page Statement by CEO ........................................................................5 Business concept, vision and mission ................................6 Business model ............................................................................7 18Properties across 24Property management that The Rikshuset concept – a strategic property ..................8 all of Sweden makes a difference Rikshem’s five target areas .....................................................10 Global challenges and possibilities .....................................12 Navigating towards sustainability .......................................14 Rikshem holds stable market position ...............................16 Operations Properties across all of Sweden ............................................18 Property valuation .................................................................... 22 Active property management .............................................. 24 Actions for a brighter future .................................................. 30 Zoning plans that support growth ..................................... 34 Property development potential ........................................ 36 Residential areas for everyone ............................................ 38 Page Engagement as a driving force ............................................40
    [Show full text]
  • Nätverksanalys I GIS-Miljö För Insatskartor
    Nätverksanalys i GIS -miljö för insatskartor En fallstudie baserad på Uppsala kommuns vägnät Victoria Samuelsson 2011 Examensarbete , kandidatnivå, 15 hp Geomatik Geomatikprogrammet Handledare: Pia Ollert-Hallqvist Examinator: Anders Östman Förord Det här är ett examensarbete på C-nivå som avslutar mina studier vid Geomatikprogrammet med inriktning mot Geografiska Informationssystem vid Högskolan i Gävle. Arbetet utfördes i samråd med Metria i Gävle. Arbetet bygger på en idé av enhetschefen Marcus Ygeby och GIS-konsulten Birgitta Fredberg på Metria. Deras tjänst, insatskartor, som erbjuds till framförallt kommuner och räddningstjänster bygger på en rasteranalys som inte har varit optimal för syftet. Någon förbättring har det inte funnits tid till, vilket ledde till detta examensarbete. Jag vill först och främst rikta ett stort tack till min kontakt på ESRI, Alexey Tereshenkov, för all värdefull hjälp som jag fått kontinuerligt under hela arbetet. Tack till Marcus Ygeby och Birgitta Fredberg som gav mig idén till arbetet. Det har varit en intressant, rolig och framförallt lärorik tid. Jag vill även tacka min handledare Pia Ollert-Hallqvist och examinatorn Anders Östman vid Högkolan i Gävle. Sist men inte minst vill jag även rikta ett tack till familjen och vännerna. Gävle, juni 2011 Victoria Samuelsson I Abstract Maximizing the catchment areas of emergency services is an important safety question that is discussed in health planning. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can be used as a support to analyse and present the percentage of the population that is outside the hospital catchment area and also show catchment area variations by restructuring the organization. The aim of this thesis is to present a new, vector-based network analysis and to investigate how the catchment areas for the emergency service in Uppsala municipality will be affected.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sustainability of Swedish Agriculture in a Coevolutionary Perspective
    The Sustainability of Swedish Agriculture in a Coevolutionary Perspective Basim Saifi Department of Rural Development and Agroecology Uppsala Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2004 Acta Universitatis Agricultuae Sueciae Agraria 469 ISSN 1401-6249 ISBN 91-576-6499-4 C 2004 Basim Saifi, Uppsala Print: SLU Service/Repro, Uppsala 2004 Abstract Basim Saifi, 2004. The Sustainability of Swedish Agriculture in a Coevolutionary Perspective. Doctoral dissertation. ISSN 1401-6249 ISBN 91-576-6499-4 Sustainability is a social construct that must be addressed contextually both in relation to what a society views to be unsustainable, and in respect to how and why a course of non-sustainable development comes to be pursued. This thesis argues that the challenge of agricultural sustainability can be fruitfully addressed within an analytical framework that consciously and explicitly considers agricultural development as consisting of processes of coevolution involving agriculture and the ecological and socioeconomic systems. The model presented indicates that strengthening of local coevolutionary processes is a probable pre- condition for achieving sustainable agriculture. Conditions for following a sustainable path of agricultural development in Sweden are already good and are still improving. On the national level, the costs of improvements in sustainability are decreasing, while the benefits are increasing. On the global level, the historical decline in food prices should not be expected to continue in the coming decades because of both resource limitations and environmental degradation. Ten principles and consequently ten indicators are identified that may help to promote agricultural sustainability in Sweden within the context of strengthened local interaction and interconnectedness. When the model of coevolution and the indicators derived are applied to Swedish agricultural development during the twentieth century, the following conclusions are reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Uppsala and Agenda 2030 Voluntary Local Review 2021
    City Executive Office File No: Report KSN-2021-00822 Uppsala and Agenda 2030 Voluntary Local Review 2021 Administrators: Susanne Angemo, Sara Duvner, Kristina Eriksson, Anna Hilding, Johan Lindqvist Page 2 (96) Chair of the City Executive Board I have been active in the city’s policy-making for many years now. I have had a particular interest in sustainability issues from the very start, and have therefore followed the work closely over the years. The City of Uppsala has also been a front-runner in the work on Agenda 21 and the Millennium Development Goals. The work was often implemented as projects, and responsibility rested with a small number of employees. The results were short-term solutions, quite the opposite of what the intention was, and still is. When the 2015 UN Summit passed a resolution on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, those of us living and working in Uppsala decided to try to integrate the issues of sustainability and Agenda 2030 in all policy areas. We started with our work on Objectives and Budget in 2016. So, for the past five years the City of Uppsala has been working instead on sustainability issues integrated as a natural part of the ordinary governance. The targets of Agenda 2030 have been dealt with either as assignments given by the city council to council boards and corporate boards, or as part of the basic duties of city boards and corporate boards. Now that we have the sustainability issues integrated in the governance, everyone is now working together as one community - One Uppsala.
    [Show full text]
  • Uppsalas Landsbygder - Nulägesbeskrivning Del 1
    STADSBYGGNADSFÖRVALTNINGEN KSN-2014-132 Underlag till arbetet med Översiktsplan för Uppsala kommun 2015-09-11 UNDERLAGSRAPPORT: Uppsalas landsbygder - nulägesbeskrivning del 1 Postadress: Uppsala kommun, stadsbyggnadsförvaltningen, 753 75 Uppsala Telefon: 018-727 00 00 (växel) E-post: [email protected] www.uppsala.se 1 (29) RAPPORTFÖRFATTARE Mimmi Skarelius Lille Stadsbyggnadsförvaltningen Uppsala kommun, 753 75 Uppsala Besöksadress: Stationsgatan 12 Telefon: 018 727 00 00 2 (29) UPPSALA KOMMUN Uppsalas landsbygder Nulägesbeskrivning, del 1 Mimmi Skarelius Lille 3 (29) Innehåll 1. Inledning ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Syfte, uppdrag och avgränsning ....................................................................................... 5 1.2 Uppsala kommuns översiktsplan ...................................................................................... 5 1.3 Uppsala kommuns landsbygdsprogram ........................................................................... 6 1.4. Dialog .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.1 Uppsalas landsbygder 2.0 .......................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Landsbygdsforum ...................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Landsbygdsutveckling på nationell- och regional nivå
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 with Sustainability Report
    Annual Report 2017 with Sustainability Report www.rikshem.se Combining professionalism with community involvement Rikshem is one of Sweden’s largest private property companies. The company owns, develops and man- ages residential properties and properties for public use – sustainably and for the long term. By investing wisely in growth areas and new production of residential properties and properties for public use, the company will continue to grow. Rikshem’s vision is to make a difference in the development of the good community. By combining professionalism with community involvement, Rikshem aims to promote long- term, sustainable community development from a social, environmental, and financial perspective. One of Sweden’s largest private property companies 28,000 SEK 41 billion Rikshem provides Sweden with The market value of the properties 27,924 residential properties across totaled MSEK 41,039. the country. Long-term owner The year in brief Rikshem AB (publ) is 100 percent owned by • Completed acquisition of 802 apartments in Umeå Rikshem Intressenter AB, in which AMF Pensionsförsäkring AB • Began production of northern Sweden’s tallest residential building (pension company) and Fjärde AP-fonden (The Fourth Swedish in wood, Flyttfågeln, in Umeå National Pension Fund, AP4) own 50 percent each. • Nominated as Community Developer of the Year alongside Lindbäcks bygg for industrial construction in wood • Changed the organization to increase focus on property management and sustainability • Issued the first euro bond under the EMTN
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report / 2020
    Annual Report / 2020 Genova – the personal Full-year January-December 2020 Rental income amounted to SEK 231.1m property (180.6), an increase of 28%. Net operating income amounted to company SEK 177.4m (129.9), an increase of 37%. Income from property management increased 49% to SEK 60.8m (40.8), of which income from property management attribut- able to ordinary shareholders was SEK 18.8m (4.1), corresponding to SEK 0.53 (0.09) per ordinary share. Net income after tax amounted to SEK 418.0m (571.0), corresponding to SEK 10.69 (11.77) per ordinary share. The decrease was due to lower changes in value for the period compared with 2019. Long-term net asset value attributable to ordinary shareholders increased 62% to SEK 2,364.6m (1,457.0), corresponding to SEK 59.75 (47.43) per ordinary share. Genova 2020 Annual Report 3 4 Genova 2020 Annual Report CEO STATEMENT 12 Genova’s CEO Michael Moschewitz presents the company’s performance for the year GENOVA’S VALUE-CREATING 20 DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Target Business model How we create value HANDELSMANNEN PROJECT 22 – from building rights to new homes in Norrtälje INVESTMENT PROPERTY PORTFOLIO 28 INVESTMENT PROPERTIES 34 Properties for long-term ownership Acquisitions and divestments Tenants PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 42 Development creates value Ongoing construction Building rights portfolio SUSTAINABILITY 50 Genova’s sustainable philosophy Genova’s sustainability performance FINANCING AND GOVERNANCE 62 Financial stability enables flexibility Risk and risk management Shares and ownership structure Board of Directors Senior executives Corporate Governance Report FINANCIAL INFORMATION 87 Directors’ Report Financial statements Contents Accounting policies and notes GENOVA’S CORPORATE Auditor’s report SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY INITIATIVES ARE PRE- SENTED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT 6 Genova 2020 Annual Report New urban In December 2020, Genova commenced the Segerdal project with the space in Knivsta construction of new rental apartments located in central Knivsta, next to the Town Hall and directly adjacent to the train station.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkeologi På Spåret I Lännalöt
    Stiftelsen Kulturmiljövård Rapport 2015:43 Arkeologi på spåret i Lännalöt Arkeologisk förundersökning Almunge 479:1 och 480:1-4 Marma 4:11, Löt 1:7, Lännalöt 1:1 Almunge socken Uppsala kommun och län Uppland Mats Nelson Arkeologi på spåret i Lännalöt Arkeologisk förundersökning Almunge 479:1 och 480:1-4 Marma 4:11, Löt 1:7, Lännalöt 1:1 Almunge socken Uppsala kommun och län Uppland Mats Nelson Stiftelsen Kulturmiljövård Rapport 2015:43 Utgivning och distribution: Stiftelsen Kulturmiljövård Stora gatan 41, 722 12 Västerås Tel: 021-80 62 80 Fax: 021-14 52 20 E-post: [email protected] © Stiftelsen Kulturmiljövård 2015 Omslagsfoto: Schakt S858, Almunge 480:1-4. Bilden tagen från norr och i bakgrunden ett lok tillhörande Upsala-Lenna Jernväg. Foto Mats Nelson. Kartor ur allmänt kartmaterial © Lantmäteriet. Ärende nr MS2012/02954. ISBN: 978-91-7453-438-2 Innehåll Sammanfattning ......................................................................................................5 Bakgrund ..................................................................................................................6 Topografi och fornlämningsmiljö ...................................................................6 Syfte, metod och genomförande ...........................................................................8 Syfte .....................................................................................................................8 Metod ..................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]