DOCSLIB.ORG

Locke's "God" Problem: Predicating God and Liberty Amid the Secularizing Effect of "Uneasiness"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2015 Locke's "God" Problem: Predicating God and Liberty Amid the Secularizing Effect of "Uneasiness" Kathleen M. Ryan Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/616 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] i Locke’s “God” Problem: Predicating God and Liberty Amid the Secularizing Effect of “Uneasiness” by Kathleen M. Ryan A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2015 ii © 2015 Kathleen M. Ryan All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. David M. Rosenthal __________________ ________________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Prof. John Greenwood __________________ ________________________________________________ Date Executive Officer Supervisory Committee Prof. Bernard Baumrin Prof. Joseph Dauben Prof. Peter Phillips Simpson Prof. Catherine Wilson THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract Locke’s “God” Problem: Predicating God and Liberty Amid the Secularizing Effect of “Uneasiness” by Kathleen M. Ryan Advisor: Professor Bernard Baumrin Notorious among philosophy texts, Locke’s Essay stands between the God-intoxicated 17th century and the science-intoxicated 18th century and has had a significant role in the transition of the one intoxication to the other. That the Essay itself underwent major revisions before it emerged in the posthumous form we’ve canonized for our enlightenment today obscures many of the issues Locke was contending with at the time to which he may not have found the kind of final answers we’ve come to attribute to him. This dissertation attempts to justify an examination of one particular chapter in the Essay -- the “Of Power” chapter of II.xxi -- in terms of its troubled creative history and with regard to some of the particular individuals who were most instrumental in its changes, with an eye to the possibility that what has been seen as Locke’s final and “fixed” account of human liberty may actually be a posthumously-executed editorial distortion of it. (1-3) v Acknowledgements I’d like to first of all thank my dissertation committee comprised of Prof. Joseph Dauben, Prof. David Rosenthal, Prof. Peter Simpson and Professor Catherine Wilson, all of whom offered me extremely thoughtful and probing questions prior to and during my defense. Notable too were the period classes I’d had earlier with Professors Dauben and Wilson which had initially prompted my thirst for understanding the issues girding Early Modern Philosophy and which broadened my field of vision as to what else might be going on when Locke was working out his theories. More insight into the metaphysical issues came in the EMP and Locke conferences I’d attended in 2012 and 2013 (sponsored by Kenneth Winkler and Jessica Gordon-Roth) during which I tried to informally rehearse some of the hypotheses I would later develop here. Special gratitude also goes to my friends Adriana Renero-Castillo, Ken Weissharr, Patricia Willard, and Joe and Linda Brindley for their everlasting patience in hearing out my philosophical arguments and for their encouraging calls to “hang in there” when I was most obviously flagging with anxieties. My biggest debt, however, is owed to my thesis advisor, Prof. Bernard [Stefan] Baumrin, whose infamous irascibility belies the extraordinary generosity with which he is imbued. Ever indulgent with his time and wisdom, he was the one who first introduced me to the history of ideas and the notion that scholarship could be built upon the supposition that odd paths may lead to new discoveries. It was Prof. Baumrin’s being particularly honed in to the religious and metaphysical debates swirling during Locke’s time that gave me a better sense of what the epistemic limits vi necessarily entailed, thus allowing me to find ways to develop my thesis and to clarify and firm up my initial rather flimsy premises. Though Prof. Baumrin likely will never quite “appreciate” Locke’s loquacious literary style in the way I did, I dearly thank Prof. Baumrin for trying his level best to curb my own penchant for verboseness as best he could. While I never was able to achieve the kind of elegant terseness Prof. Baumrin has able to master in his own work, may I only plead that this weakness of mine is probably the central reason for my feeling a special affinity for Locke. vii Table of Contents (parenthetical numerals following sections refer to Analytic TOC enumeration) Front Matter Title page i Copyright page ii Approval page iii Abstract (1-3) iv Acknowledgments v Table of Contents vii Quotes from Plato’s Parmenides & Aristotle’s De Anima 1 Chapter I 2 Preliminaries 2 A. My Argument (4-14) 2 B. Hypotheses explaining why previous Locke commentators failed to understand Locke’s “Of Power” chapter properly (15-19) 5 C. Special Note: Thesis limits (20-22) 7 Chapter II 9 Introduction: The “‘God’ Problem” (Molyneux quote; scrawl text) 9 A. Back story (23-28) 9 viii B. The Chapter’s Three Stages (29-31) 14 C. Three questions prompted by the sequence of revisions which seem in need of answering (32-34) 18 D. Initial answers to the first two questions (35-38) 19 E. Answer to Question #3 lies at the core of Locke’s error of logic, and is what needs to be disentangled (39-40) 21 Chapter III 22 The Case for Disentanglement: Three Competing Theses for the Resolution of Locke’s “‘God’ problem” 22 (1) The philosophical thesis (41) 22 (2) The circumstantial thesis (42-43) 22 (3) The prudential thesis (44-45) 22 B. Most important to keep in mind overall (46) 25 Chapter IV 26 The philosophical thesis 26 A. The Analogical Error (47-49) 26 B. Question[s] (50-51) 27 C. Moral philosophers debated (52-54) 29 D. Analogical Predication (55-60) 30 E. What counts for success in analogical predication (61-64) 34 ix F. Calling on Euthyphro (65-67) 36 a. Hobbes (68-70) 38 b. Cudworth (71-73) 42 G. Back to Locke (74-81) 45 H. The competing pressures driving Locke to formulate his account the way he did 52 Chapter V 54 The Baconist Component: How Locke’s Growing Baconianism Causes Shift of Argument for Second Edition of the Essay (82) 54 A. The Sergeant/Norris challenge (83-85) 56 B. The King challenge (86-89) 58 C. Consequence of King’s input (90-93) 69 Chapter VI 72 The Calvinist Component: How Locke’s Puritan Origins Kick In At the End and Preserve His Original Theological Determinism against the Anglican form of “Free Grace” prior to posthumous Fifth Edition of the Essay 72 A. The Limborch challenge (94-109) 72 x Chapter VII 95 The circumstantial thesis: Posthumous Confusion (110-116) 95 Chapter VIII 104 The Coste Component: Why I think the version of the liberty account of Locke’s that does get published posthumously in 1706 does not truly reflect Locke’s intentions but was instead rather selectively “massaged” by his French translator, Pierre Coste 104 A. Coste’s Problems with Locke (117-118) 104 B. The proffered timeline, and what remains puzzling (119-130) 107 D. Coste’s biography/relationship with Locke (131-134) 123 E. Shaftesbury’s Role (135-138) 126 Chapter IX 136 The prudential thesis: The “Uneasiness Encounters Self-Abasement and Topples It” Component (140-146) 136 Chapter X 143 Conclusion 143 A. How I got here (147-152) 143 B. The Collins Component (153-162) 150 C. What Locke could have done (163-164) 153 xi D. In sum (165-167) 157 Chapter XI 158 Ideas/Topics for Future Investigation 158 Endnotes 160 Appendix 214 Bibliography 270 xii Appendix list Appendix I: Analytic Table of Contents 214 Appendix II: Publication dates of various Essay editions 231 Appendix III: Coste obit of Locke 232 Appendix IV: Changes mentioned in various versions of Locke’s “Epistle to the Reader” (Essay) 240 Appendix V: LeClerc’s comment on Coste’s first French translation of the Essay 241 Appendix VI: The important Le Clerc text regarding the change to §71 based on Locke’s correspondence w/ Limborch 242 Appendix VII: Coste’s front matter to French translations of the Essay 250 Appendix VIII: Pertinent Molyneux/Locke correspondence list 257 Appendix IX: Pertinent Limbroch/Locke correspondence list 258 Appendix X: Charts comparing revisions between Essay editions 4 & 5, etc. 262 Appendix XI: Ngrams for English texts printed between 1600-1800 regarding “liberty of indifference,” the five “graces,” Pelagianism, and “Uneasiness” 268 1 Parmenides: Well, whatever else partakes of knowledge itself, wouldn’t you say that god more than anyone else has this most precise knowledge? Socrates: Necessarily. P: Tell me, will god, having knowledge itself, then be able to know things that belong to our world? S: Yes, why not? P: Because we have agreed, Socrates, that those forms do not have their power in relation to things in our world, and things in our world do not have theirs in relation to forms, but that things in each group have their power in relation to themselves. S: Yes, we did agree on that. P: Well then, if this most precise mastery and this most precise knowledge belong to the divine, the gods’ mastery could never master us, nor could their knowledge know us or anything that belongs to us.
Recommended publications
  • Truth and Toleration in Early Modern Thought

    Truth and Toleration in Early Modern Thought

    King’s Research Portal Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Antognazza, M. R. (2019). Truth and Toleration in Early Modern Thought. In I. Hunter, & R. Whatmore (Eds.), Philosophy, Rights and Natural Law Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
  • 2014 Eastern Division Meeting Program

    2014 Eastern Division Meeting Program

    The American Philosophical Association EASTERN DIVISION ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM PHILADELPHIA MARRIOTT DOWNTOWN PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA DECEMBER 27 – 30, 2014 Visit us at APA Eastern for books, journals, and more. INNER EXPERIENCE WHY BE MORAL? Georges Bataille Learning from the Neo-Confucian Translated and with an Introduction by Cheng Brothers Stuart Kendall Yong Huang SACRIFICE IN THE POST- JOHN Dewey’S KANTIAN TRADITION EARLIER LOGICAL THEORY Perspectivism, Intersubjectivity, James Scott Johnston and Recognition Paolo Diego Bubbio EXISTENCE Philosophical Theology, Volume Two THE RETURNS OF ANTIGONE Robert Cummings Neville Interdisciplinary Essays Tina Chanter and Sean D. Kirkland, editors HOW TO ESCAPE Magic, Madness, Beauty, and Cynicism MORE THAN DISCOURSE Crispin Sartwell Symbolic Expressions of Naturalistic Faith ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL Donald A. Crosby CONCEPTS OF FRIENDSHIP Suzanne Stern-Gillet and A MAN OF LITTLE FAITH Gary M. Gurtler, S.J., editors Michel Deguy With Two Essays by Jean-Luc Nancy GOOD WHITE PEOPLE Translated, edited, and with an The Problem with Middle-Class Introduction by Christopher Elson White Anti-Racism Shannon Sullivan MANIFESTO OF NEW REALISM Maurizio Ferraris EMPLOTTING VIRTUE Translated by Sarah De Sanctis A Narrative Approach to Foreword by Graham Harman Environmental Virtue Ethics Brian Treanor JOURNALS philoSOPHIA THE JOURNAL OF A Journal of Continental Feminism JAPANESE PHILOSOPHY Lynne Huffer and Mayuko Uehara, editor in chief Shannon Winnubst, editors Wing-keung Lam, associate editor Ching-yuen Cheung, Leah Kalmanson, and John W. M. Krummel, assistant editors Curtis Rigsby, book review editor IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR MEETING ATTENDEES SESSION LOCATIONS Please note: the locations of all individual sessions will be included in the paper program that you will receive when you pick up your registration materials at the meeting.
  • How to Weaponize a Philosopher: Hobbes' Deadly Arsenal

    How to Weaponize a Philosopher: Hobbes' Deadly Arsenal

    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Religious Studies Theses Department of Religious Studies Summer 8-15-2013 How to Weaponize a Philosopher: Hobbes' Deadly Arsenal James Webb Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses Recommended Citation Webb, James, "How to Weaponize a Philosopher: Hobbes' Deadly Arsenal." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2013. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses/40 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW TO WEAPONIZE A PHILOSOPHER: HOBBES’ DEADLY ARSENAL by JAMES WEBB Under the Direction of Timothy Renick ABSTRACT This is a complex argument about the history of transformations in value through the rise of modern liberalism. I argue that there are several contradictions that emerge from these trans- formations. I argue that these contradictions emerge as double effects of liberalism, in tension with the project of liberalism and thriving in spite of it. My data are the theories of Thomas Hobbes and the interpretations of his work. Hobbes is a good datum for the project because he is representative of several of these transformations in value due to the time when and concepts with which he writes. I conclude that these transformations
  • Philipp Van Limborch Y John Locke. La Influencia Arminiana Sobre La Teología Y Noción De Tolerancia De Locke

    Philipp Van Limborch Y John Locke. La Influencia Arminiana Sobre La Teología Y Noción De Tolerancia De Locke

    05_ManfredSVENSSON.qxd:Maqueta.qxd 22/6/09 13:01 Página 261 PHILIPP VAN LIMBORCH Y JOHN LOCKE. LA INFLUENCIA ARMINIANA SOBRE LA TEOLOGÍA Y NOCIÓN DE TOLERANCIA DE LOCKE MANFRED SVENSSON Universidad de los Andes, Santiago de Chile RESUMEN: El presente trabajo constituye un análisis del modo en que la principal obra de la teología arminiana del siglo XVII, la Theologia Christiana de Philipp van Limborch, influyó sobre John Locke. El objetivo es doble: mostrar, por una parte, la influencia de van Limborch sobre las reflexiones teológi- cas de John Locke y, por otra parte, el modo en que la concepción de tolerancia de Locke se enmar- ca dentro de ese tipo específico de teología. PALABRAS CLAVE: Locke, van Limborch, tolerancia, teología, necesario-no necesario, adiaphora. Philipp van Limborch and John Locke. The Arminian Influence on Locke’s Theology and Theory of Toleration ABSTRACT: The aim of this essay is to present an analysis of the way in which the principal theological work of Dutch Arminianism of seventeenth-century, Theologia Christiana of Philipp van Limborch influenced John Locke. The aim is twofold: to show, on the one hand, the influence of van Limborch’s theology on Locke’s theological reflections, on the other hand, the way in which Locke’s understanding of tolerance is embedded in this kind of theology. KEY WORDS: Locke, van Limborch, tolerance, theology, necessary-non necessary, adiaphora. I. INTRODUCCIÓN Philipp van Limborch (1633-1712) es un autor hoy completamente desco- nocido. Sin embargo, su nombre es impreso aún hoy con cierta frecuencia, a saber, cada vez que se imprime la Epistola de Tolerantia de Locke, a él dedica- da 1.
  • Intolerância Religiosa E Excomunhão Em Amsterdã: O Caso Uriel Da Costa

    Intolerância Religiosa E Excomunhão Em Amsterdã: O Caso Uriel Da Costa

    INTOLERÂNCIA RELIGIOSA E EXCOMUNHÃO EM AMSTERDÃ: O CASO URIEL DA COSTA Ernania Santana Santos*1 Resumo: A intolerância religiosa apesar de ser um tema ainda tão atual, remonta ao século XVI, e foi responsável por causar várias vítimas ao longo dos tempos, nesse sentido, se insere o caso de Uriel da Costa, cristão-novo que após empreender fuga para Amsterdam, onde havia uma certa liberdade religiosa para praticar o judaísmo, mas por defender ideias ortodoxas terminou sofrendo uma impiedosa perseguição que levou a excomunhão, consequentemente não suportando tamanha desonra cometeu o suicídio. Nesse período Holanda já se apresentava como centro econômico promissor, mas também com várias congregações judaicas e como refúgio para muitos perseguidos de praticar sua fé judaica em regiões onde o santo ofício atuava. Entre a historiografia há uma certa tendência em perceber uma evolução do pensamento de Da Costa dividido por fases transitando desde o catolicismo até o deísmo com paradas no marranismo criptojudaico e no judaísmo mais ortodoxo pelo meio do caminho. Palavras-chave: Intolerância, Excomunhão, Ortodoxia, Heterodoxia ABSTRACT Summary: Religious intolerance despite being a subject still so present, dates back to the sixteenth century, and was responsible for causing several casualties over time, in this sense, fits the case of Uriel da Costa, a New Christian who undertake after escape to Amsterdam, where there was a certain religious freedom to practice Judaism, but to defend orthodox ideas ended up suffering a merciless persecution that led to excommunication, thus not supporting such dishonor committed suicide. During this period the Netherlands has presented itself as promising economic center, but also with various Jewish congregations and as a refuge for many persecuted to practice their Jewish faith in regions where the holy office acted.
  • Zwe Meditazzons of Rene Descartes and the Legi'rmatiqn of the Project of Mechanism

    Zwe Meditazzons of Rene Descartes and the Legi'rmatiqn of the Project of Mechanism

    ZWE MEDITAZZONS OF RENE DESCARTES AND THE LEGI'RMATIQN OF THE PROJECT OF MECHANISM: DAVID ANDREW CRAGG A Thesis submitted to the facuity of Emrmnuel Coiïege and the Department of Theology of the Toronto School of Theology. In partiai fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Theology awarded by the University of St. Miehael9sCollege Toronto 1997 National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 335, rwWeliington OüawaON K1AW atawaON K1AW Canada Cariada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Lîbraxy of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distniute or sell reproduire, prêter, distri'buer ou copies of this thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic fonmats. la forme de microfiche/lfilm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conseme la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thése. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permissim. autorisation. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1: The Roject of Mechsnicm Mechanism's concept of matter Four aspects of the inertness of matter in mechanism
  • The Letters of Burchard De Volder to Philipp Van Limborch

    The Letters of Burchard De Volder to Philipp Van Limborch

    THE LETTERS OF BURCHARD DE VOLDER TO PHILIPP VAN LIMBORCH ANDREA STRAZZONI In these notes I provide the transcription and annotated edition of the only four extant letters of the Dutch Cartesian-inspired philosopher and mathem- atician Burchard de Volder (1643–1709), professor at Leiden from 1670 to 1705, to the Remonstrant theologian Philipp van Limborch (1633–1712), pro- fessor of theology in the Amsterdam Remonstrant seminary from 1668 to 1712. As the reader can find detailed reconstructions both of De Volder’s and Van Limborch’s lives and intellectual paths in a variety of secondary sources,1 it is enough to give here some insights into their direct connections only, be- fore turning to the correspondence itself. Burchard de Volder, born in Amsterdam in 1643 son of Joost de Volder, Mennonite landscape painter and translator of Hugo Grotius’s De veritate reli- gionis Christianae (1627) into Dutch,2 received his master’s degree at Utrecht in 1660 (under Johannes de Bruyn), and his medical doctorate at Leiden on 3 1 As to De Volder, see KLEVER 1988; WIESENFELDT 2002, 54–64, 99–132; WIESENFELDT 2003; LODGE 2005; NYDEN 2013; NYDEN 2014; VAN BUNGE 2013; VAN BUNGE 2017. As to Van Limborch, see BARNOUW 1963; SIMONUTTI 1984; SIMONUTTI 1990; SIMONUTTI 2002; HICKS 1985; VAN ROODEN, WESSELIUS 1987; DE SCHEPPER 1993; VAN BUNGE 2003; LANDUCCI 2015; DAUGIRDAS 2017. 2 Cf. GROTIUS 1653. On Joost de Volder, see BECK 1972–1991, volume 4, 422–427; WELLER 2009, 216–219; LAMBOUR 2012. 268 Noctua, anno V, n. 2, 2018, ISSN 2284-1180 July 1664 (under Franciscus Sylvius).
  • The Secular Transformation of Pride and Humility in the Moral Philophy of David Hume

    The Secular Transformation of Pride and Humility in the Moral Philophy of David Hume

    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects The ecS ular Transformation of Pride and Humility in the Moral Philosophy of David Hume Kirstin April Carlson McPherson Marquette University Recommended Citation McPherson, Kirstin April Carlson, "The eS cular Transformation of Pride and Humility in the Moral Philosophy of David Hume" (2016). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 625. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/625 THE SECULAR TRANSFORMATION OF PRIDE AND HUMILITY IN THE MORAL PHILOPHY OF DAVID HUME by Kirstin Carlson McPherson, B.A., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2016 ABSTRACT: THE SECULAR TRANSFORMATION OF PRIDE AND HUMILITY IN THE MORAL PHILOSOPHY OF DAVID HUME Kirstin Carlson McPherson, B.A., M.A. Marquette University, 2016 In this dissertation I examine Hume’s secular re-definition and re-evaluation of the traditional Christian understanding of pride and humility as part of his project to establish a fully secular account of ethics and to undermine what he thought to be the harmful aspects of religious morality. Christians traditionally have seen humility, understood as receptivity to God, to be crucial for individual and social flourishing, and pride as the root of individual and social disorder. By contrast, Hume, who conceives of pride and humility immanently in terms of our self-appraisals, sees pride as a key virtue that serves as the ultimate source of moral motivation and deems humility a ‘monkish virtue’ (i.e., a vice). Hume, moreover, sees religious appeals to a transcendent moral source to be a threat to individual flourishing in that they encourage the formation of what he calls ‘artificial lives’ (of which the monkish virtues are an expression) as well as a threat to social concord, insofar as they foster unnecessary religious factions, intolerance, and theologically sanctioned violence.
  • Dominant Metaphor in Maltese Literature

    Dominant Metaphor in Maltese Literature

    Abstract This study deals with the way Malta has been represented in poetry and narrative written in Maltese. Metaphor, with its ability to stretch language and thought beyond its elastic limit, has played a fundamental role in the forging of the national imaginary that lies at the junction between real history and literary texts. On one hand, the conventional conceptual metaphors of the mother, home, traveller, and village are rooted in conventional conceptions of the nation; on the other, the relocation of the motherland in the sea marks a return to and a reinterpretation of the figure of the mother. While conventional conceptual metaphors have the potential to structure the concept of the nation by imagining the unimagined, fresh conceptual metaphors simultaneously create and defy that new structure. Dominant Metaphors in Maltese Literature DominantDominant MetaphorsMetaphors inin MalteseMaltese LiteratureLiterature Adrian Grima 2003 2 Dominant Metaphors in Maltese Literature This is an original study written by Adrian Grima 3 Dominant Metaphors in Maltese Literature 4 Dominant Metaphors in Maltese Literature DominantDominant MetaphorsMetaphors inin MalteseMaltese LiteratureLiterature A dissertation presented to the Faculty of Arts of the University of Malta for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Maltese Adrian Grima June, 2003 5 Dominant Metaphors in Maltese Literature A Note of Thanks I would like to thank my two supervisors, Professor Oliver Friggieri of the University of Malta and Professor Joseph A. Buttigieg of the University of Notre Dame (Indiana, USA) for their expert advice and encouragement throughout the six years that I have been working on this dissertation. I would also like to thank my colleagues at work, especially Mr.
  • A Reading of Shaftesbury's Characteristicks

    A Reading of Shaftesbury's Characteristicks

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2010 Sea-Cards for the Impetuous Muse: A Reading of Shaftesbury's Characteristicks Travis Sean Cook Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Cook, Travis Sean, "Sea-Cards for the Impetuous Muse: A Reading of Shaftesbury's Characteristicks" (2010). Dissertations. 31. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/31 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2010 Travis Sean Cook LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO SEA-CARDS FOR THE IMPETUOUS MUSE: A READING OF SHAFTESBURY'S CHARACTERISTICKS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE BY TRAVIS SEAN COOK CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2010 Copyright by Travis S. Cook, 2010 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have incurred many debts in the writing of this dissertation--in fact, too many to catalogue accurately. Nevertheless: I have been blessed with many excellent teachers over the years. I am very grateful to the members of my committee for the time, care, insight, and patience they offered as I worked on this project. Professor John Danford has been an excellent teacher and keen reader; I am grateful for the generosity and kindness he has shown to me.
  • Lutheran Synod Quarterly

    Lutheran Synod Quarterly

    LUTHERAN SYNOD QUARTERLY VOLUME 52 • NUMBER 4 DECEMBER 2012 The theological journal of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary LUTHERAN SYNOD QUARTERLY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF........................................................... Gaylin R. Schmeling BOOK REVIEW EDITOR ......................................................... Michael K. Smith LAYOUT EDITOR ................................................................. Daniel J. Hartwig PRINTER ......................................................... Books of the Way of the Lord FACULTY............. Adolph L. Harstad, Thomas A. Kuster, Dennis W. Marzolf, Gaylin R. Schmeling, Michael K. Smith, Erling T. Teigen The Lutheran Synod Quarterly (ISSN: 0360-9685) is edited by the faculty of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary 6 Browns Court Mankato, Minnesota 56001 The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is a continuation of the Clergy Bulletin (1941–1960). The purpose of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly, as was the purpose of the Clergy Bulletin, is to provide a testimony of the theological position of the Evangelical Contents Lutheran Synod and also to promote the academic growth of her clergy roster by providing scholarly articles, rooted in the inerrancy of the Holy Scriptures and the LSQ Vol. 52, No. 4 (December 2012) Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. ARTICLES The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is published in March and December with a Perspicuity: The Clarity of Scripture ..............................................267 combined June and September issue. Subscription rates are $25.00 U.S. per year Shawn D. Stafford for domestic subscriptions and $35.00 U.S. per year for international subscriptions. The Formula of Concord in Light of the Overwhelming All subscriptions and editorial correspondence should be sent to the following Arminianism of American Christianity ..........................................301 address: Timothy R. Schmeling Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary The Divine Liturgy and its Use .....................................................335 Attn: Lutheran Synod Quarterly Gaylin R.
  • The Church [1411]

    The Church [1411]

    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Jan Huss, The Church [1411] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected]. LIBERTY FUND, INC.