DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Flood Emergency Response Project Republika Srpska and Brčko District Project preparation process Public Disclosure Authorized Banja Luka, October, 2014 Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) in the SUBJECT Flood Emergency Response Project - Republika Srpska and Brčko District Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, Bosnia and CLIENT Herzegovina Civil Engineering Institute "IG" LLC Banja Luka CONSULTANT Water Management Institute LLC Bijeljina PROTOCOL NUMBER IZ-IGBL-IN-EK - 2009/14 Nebojša Knežević, M.Sc. Technology Saša Dunović, M.Sc. Technology Nevenko Samouković, B.Sc. Civ.Eng. / hydro engineer Ranka Pušić, B.Sc. Biology RADNI TIM Dušan Lajšić, BA Law Prof. Branislav Đorđević, PhD Siniša Cukut, M.Sc. Chemical Eng. Bojana Ivić, B.Sc. Forestry Manager _____________________________ Slobodan Stanarević, M.Sc. Civ.Eng. Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF)| 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.1. CONSEQUENCES OF THE FLOOD FOR PRIORITY SECTORS ............................................................................................. 8 2.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.2.1. Nature of envisaged activities ............................................................................................................. 9 2.3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTIES OF THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION LOCATION .......................................................... 10 2.3.1. Republika Srpska ............................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.1.1. Flood-endangered areas ............................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1.3. Description of environment in the flooded areas ......................................................................................... 14 2.3.2. Brčko District ..................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3.2.1. Assessed impact scope .................................................................................................................................. 23 3. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE REPUBLIKA SRPSKA AND BRČKO DISTRICT .............. 24 3.1. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE REPUBLIKA SRPSKA ....................................................................................... 24 3.1.1. Overview of legislation in the field of environment........................................................................... 24 3.1.2. Environmental impact assessment procedure in the Republika Srpska ............................................ 24 3.1.3. Process of the construction permit and water management acts acquiring .................................... 27 3.2. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE BRČKO DISTRICT .......................................................................................... 29 3.2.1. Overview of legislation in the field of environment protection ......................................................... 29 3.2.2. Environmental impact assessment procedure in the Brčko District .................................................. 30 3.2.3. Process of the construction permit and water management acts acquiring .................................... 32 4. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OF THE WORLD BANK ........................................................ 34 4.1. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGISLATION OF WB AND RS/BD ................................................................................. 36 5. OVERVIEW OF IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ON ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................... 40 5.1.1. Impacts in the project preparation phase ......................................................................................... 40 5.1.2. Impacts in the project implementation phase ................................................................................... 40 5.1.2.1. General impacts for all sectors ...................................................................................................................... 40 5.1.2.2. Specific impacts for some sectors ................................................................................................................. 42 5.1.3. Impacts in the phase of exploitation ................................................................................................. 43 5.1.4. Social impact of the project assessment ..................................................................................... 43 6. ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL CHECK-UP FORM ................................................................................................ 45 6.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 45 6.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SCREENING CHECKLIST ......................................................................................................... 45 6.3. DIRECTIONS FOR USE AND APPLICATION OF RESULTS ............................................................................................... 46 6.4. CHECKLIST QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................................................... 47 7. ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................................................................... 54 7.1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION PLAN ........................................................................................... 54 7.2. ENVIRONMENT CONDITION MONITORING PLAN ..................................................................................................... 62 7.3. RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................................... 66 7.4. CAPACITIES BUILDING AND NEED FOR TRAINING ..................................................................................................... 66 8. RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK (RPF) ................................................................................................ 67 8.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 67 8.2. LEGAL AND POLITICAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................... 67 8.2.1. World Bank's requirements – Operational Policies OP 4.12 .............................................................. 67 8.2.2. National framework .......................................................................................................................... 69 8.2.2.1. Constitution-guaranteed rights ..................................................................................................................... 69 8.2.3. Property and legal regulations significant for the project ................................................................. 69 8.2.3.1. Combined requirements of National legislation and the World Bank to be applied to the project .............. 78 8.2.4. Procedure of acquisition / expropriation and resettlement .............................................................. 78 8.2.4.1. Expropriation ................................................................................................................................................. 79 8.2.4.2. Compensation for Expropriated Real Property ............................................................................................. 80 Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) | 4 8.2.4.3. Property easements ...................................................................................................................................... 81 8.2.4.4. Compensation for established easement ...................................................................................................... 82 8.2.4.5. Expropriation procedure ............................................................................................................................... 82 8.2.4.6. Taking Possession of Expropriated Real Property ......................................................................................... 83 8.2.4.6.1. De-expropriation ...................................................................................................................................... 83 8.2.4.7. Expropriation procedure costs ...................................................................................................................... 83 8.2.4.8. Procedure for determination of compensation for expropriated real estates .............................................. 83 8.2.5. Appeal procedure .............................................................................................................................. 84 8.2.5.1. Right to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rivers and Lakes in Serbia
    NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA Čika Ljubina 8, 11000 Belgrade Phone: +381 11 6557 100 Rivers and Lakes Fax: +381 11 2626 767 E-mail: [email protected] www.serbia.travel Tourist Information Centre and Souvenir Shop Tel : +381 11 6557 127 in Serbia E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA www.serbia.travel Rivers and Lakes in Serbia PALIĆ LAKE BELA CRKVA LAKES LAKE OF BOR SILVER LAKE GAZIVODE LAKE VLASINA LAKE LAKES OF THE UVAC RIVER LIM RIVER DRINA RIVER SAVA RIVER ADA CIGANLIJA LAKE BELGRADE DANUBE RIVER TIMOK RIVER NIŠAVA RIVER IBAR RIVER WESTERN MORAVA RIVER SOUTHERN MORAVA RIVER GREAT MORAVA RIVER TISA RIVER MORE RIVERS AND LAKES International Border Monastery Provincial Border UNESKO Cultural Site Settlement Signs Castle, Medieval Town Archeological Site Rivers and Lakes Roman Emperors Route Highway (pay toll, enterance) Spa, Air Spa One-lane Highway Rural tourism Regional Road Rafting International Border Crossing Fishing Area Airport Camp Tourist Port Bicycle trail “A river could be an ocean, if it doubled up – it has in itself so much enormous, eternal water ...” Miroslav Antić - serbian poet Photo-poetry on the rivers and lakes of Serbia There is a poetic image saying that the wide lowland of The famous Viennese waltz The Blue Danube by Johann Vojvodina in the north of Serbia reminds us of a sea during Baptist Strauss, Jr. is known to have been composed exactly the night, under the splendor of the stars. There really used to on his journey down the Danube, the river that connects 10 be the Pannonian Sea, but had flowed away a long time ago.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • Vodič Kroz Tipove Staništa Bih Prema Direktivi O Staništima EU
    Vodič kroz tipove staništa BiH prema Direktivi o staništima EU Januar 2015 Ova publikacija je rezultat projekta Podrška provođenju Direktive o pticama i Direktive o staništima u Bosni i Hercegovini (2012-2015). Projekt je financirala Švedska, Švedska Agencija za međunarodnu saradnju za razvoj, a upravljala mu je Delegacija Europske unije u Bosni i Hercegovini. Stavovi izraženi u ovoj publikaciji su stavovi autora i nikako se ne mogu smatrati stavovima Evropske unije. Autori: Đorđije Milanović, Jugoslav Brujić, Samir Đug, Edina Muratović i Lada Lukić Bilela Urednik: Peter Skoberne Tehnički urednik: Ivaylo Zafirov Voditelj projektnog tima: Aleksander Golob Članice i članovi Upravnog odbora projekta: Nermina Skejović-Hurić (koordinatorica projekta), Tomislav Lukić, Željka Stojičić, Zineta Mujaković, Adi Habul, Hanka Mušimbegović, Azra Rogović-Grubić, Boris Marković, Semra Buza, Stanko Stančić i Zoran Lukač Dizajn: Bunker www.madeinbunker.com Tisak: Ringeis www.ringeis.ba Izdavač: Prospect C&S s.a.. Rue du Prince Royal 83, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Slobodni ste kopirati, distribuirati i prikazati ovaj rad pod uvjetima da se navodi njegove autore, da se rad ne koristi u komercijalne svrhe i da se ništa ne mijenja, transformira ili nadograđuje bez spominjanja autora. U svakom drugom slučaju traži se pisano odobrenje od strane izdavača. 2 Sadržaj Uvod 8 Pregled evropskih značajnih tipova staništa u Bosni i Hercegovini 11 Slana staništa 16 1110 Plitka pjeskovita morska dna 16 uvijek prekrivena vodom 16 1160 Veliki plitki zalivi i zatoni 18 1240 Stjenovite i kamenite mediteranske 20 obale sa endemičnim vrstama roda 20 Limonium 20 Slatke vode 22 3130 Oligotrofne do mezotrofne stajaćice sa vegetacijom Littorelletea uniflorae i/ili Isoeto-Nanojuncetea 22 3140 Tvrde oligo-mezotrofne vode sa bentoskom vegetacijom Chara sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevni~Ke ^Etvrtak, 25
    OD DANAS NOVI FEQTON U GLASU SRPSKE" " KRVAVA KO[UQA SARAJEVSKA" " POMEN UMORENOJ SABRA]I Bawa Luka Godina LXV www.glassrpske.com Izbor iz dnevni~ke ^etvrtak, 25. oktobar 2007. Broj 11.432, cijena 0,8 KM proze Veqka Kojovi}a, nedavno preminulog publiciste Strana 20. RUKOVODSTVO I JAVNOST SRPSKE PREPOZNALI CIQEVE LAJ^AKOVIH ODLUKA NE" NOVIM PODVALAMA "RUKOVODSTVO Republike Partije demokratskog progresa, Srpske odlu~no je da demokrat- Demokratskog narodnog saveza, skim i zakonom dozvoqenim mje- Socijalisti~ke partije i Srp- rama stane u odbranu interesa ske radikalne stranke Republi- Srpske i srpskog naroda, ~iji je ke Srpske. opstanak, nema nikakve sumwe, Predstavnik Saveza za koor- ugro`en posqedwim odlukama vi- dinaciju udru`ewa izbjeglica i sokog predstavnika u BiH. raseqenih lica Republike Srp- Iako u OHR-u tvrde da na- ske Vojislav Mili{i} rekao je metnute odluke visokog predstav- da od politi~kih lidera Srpske nika u BiH Miroslava Laj~aka o~ekuje jedinstvo, odlu~nost i is- nisu usmjerene protiv Srpske ni trajnost. bilo kog entiteta ili naroda u Potpredsjednik Studentske BiH, Srbi u Srpskoj i BiH, po- unije Republike Srpske Sr|an u~eni ranijim iskustvima i li- Raduq naglasio je da Studentska cemjerstvom me|unarodne zajed- unija osu|uje posqedwe postup- nice, ipak, vi{e vjeruju srpskim ke visokog predstavnika i da je politi~arima i stru~wacima, ko- iz wih vidqivo da se BiH ne mo- ji su i u ovom slu~aju prepozna- `e zvati demokratska. li prevaru. - Takve su odluke nastojawe da To je za medije iz Srbije po- se minimizira uloga jednog na- tvrdio i premijer Republike roda, u ovom slu~aju srpskog - re- Srpske Milorad Dodik.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation to Climate Change in EIA in Serbia
    Adaptation to Climate Change in EIA in Serbia Mićun Stanić, Dept. of Environmental Impact Assessment THE APPROACH the workshop on adaptation to climate change in transboundary basins (Geneve 10-12 May 2010) was → for a 70-100 year period → possible flood and drought scenarios → from simple to very sophisticated climatology modeling my presentation was quite different → for a 20-30 year period → concerning possible drought → simple linear trend scenarios Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning THE APPROACH the presentation was well accepted everybody in the room believed in climate change the complete opposite attitude I am used to the experts that make the EIAs are all believers in no change whatsoever Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning THE FLAT they are engineers trained to this you do by procedure 1...2.....3.. so if you approach them with possible change of elements of design due to possible climate change in the future they will question your sound judgment try to ignore this completely Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning THE FLAT this can be quite expected due to required EXTRA effort this cannot be copy-pasted even the add-trendline seems to be complicated when you finally ask if it could influence the project “It will have no influence whatsoever” an engineer doesn’t work in the future it is the FLAT approach Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning FLAT 12,0 11,5 11,0 10,5 10,0 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 CHANGE 12,0 11,5 11,0 10,5 10,0 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 1980
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Jelena Mrgić-Radojčić Faculty of Philosophy Belgrade RETHINKING the TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT of the MEDIEVAL BOSNIAN STATE* In
    ИСТОРИЈСКИ ЧАСОПИС, књ. LI (2004) стр. 43-64 HISTORICAL REVIEW, Vol. LI (2004) pр. 43-64 УДК : 94(497.15) ”04/14” : 929 Jelena Mrgić-Radojčić Faculty of Philosophy Belgrade RETHINKING THE TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MEDIEVAL BOSNIAN STATE* In many ways, the medieval Bosnian state developed at the cross- roads – between West and East, the Hungarian Kingdom, a predomi- nantly Western European state, and the Serbian Kingdom, under the strong influence of the Byzantine Empire. One may, without any further elaboration, say that Bosnia formed the periphery of both the Byzantine Empire, and Western Europe (first the Frankish and then the Hungarian state). Bosnia was far away from the most important communication line of the Balkans: the valleys of the rivers Morava and Vardar, Via militaris and also those of the rivers Ibar and Sitnica. The axis of the Bosnian state was the valley of the river Bosna, but not of the Drina ill suited for 1 communication with it steep banks and many canyons. * The author wishes to thank Prof. J. Koder, University of Vienna, Prof. S. Ćirković, Prof. M. Blagojević, and Prof. S. Mišić of Belgrade University for their usuful com- ments and corrections of the following text. 1J. Ferluga, Vizantiska uprava u Dalmaciji, (Byzantine Administration in Dalmatia), Beograd 1957; J. Koder, Der Lebensraum der Byzantiner. Historisch-geographischer Abriß ihres Mittelalterlichen Staates im östlichen Mittelmeerraum, Byzantische Geschichtsschreiber 1, Graz-Wien-Köln 1984, 20012, 13-21, passim; S. Ćirković, Bosna i Vizantija (Bosnia and Byzantium), Osam Stotina godina povelje bana Kulina, Sarajevo 1989, 23-35. Even though Bosnia was situated on the »cross-roads«, it is unacceptable to depict it as being “more of a no-man's-land than a meeting ground between the two worlds“, as J.V.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Географски И Метеоролошки Подаци Geographical and Meteorological Data
    No type Географски и метеоролошки подаци Geographical and meteorological data 15 Географски и метеоролошки подаци 2 Geographical and meteorological data Методолошка објашњења Methodological explanations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 ТАБЕЛЕ TABLES 2.1. Географске координате крајњих тачака Републике Српске Geographical coordinates of the extreme points of Republika Srpska ............................................................................................... 25 2.2. Дужина граница и површина Републике Српске Length of boundaries and surface area of Republika Srpska ........................................................................................................... 25 2.3. Језера и рибњаци Lakes and fishponds ......................................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.4. Планине и планински врхови Mountains and mountain peaks ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.5. Ријеке Rivers ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 2.6. Јачи земљотреси, 1996–2015, са епицентрима на територији Републике Српске
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Impact Study
    Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia-Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Final revised versions that incorporates inputs from consultations with the public and relevant authorities Zagreb, May 2015 IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Strategic Environmental Impact Study Document quality information Authors of SEA Jiří Dusík, Dipl. Engineer - Water Resource Engineering Study Marta Brkić, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Ivan Juratek, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Vjeran Magjarević, B. Sc. Phys. Tomislav Hriberšek, B.Sc. Geology Ines Geci, B.Sc. Geology Mario Pokrivač, B.Sc. Traffic, Occupational Safety Specialist Authors of Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Appropriate Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology Assessment M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Tajana Uzelac Obradović, B.Sc. Biology Project name Ex-ante evaluation and Strategic Environmental Assessment for Interreg IPA Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Document name Strategic Environmental Impact Study Version and Final draft incorporating comments after public consultations (20 May dates 2015) Reference U070_14 Managing Directorate for Managing Cooperation Programmes and Regional authority Development within the Agency for Regional Development Sent to Service for Managing Cooperation Programmes Sent on (date): 20 May 2015 Contact
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Srebrenica Drina Euroregion
    P a g e | 1 MASTER PLAN SREBRENICA DRINA EUROREGION P a g e | 2 Contents MASTER PLAN.................................................................................................................................... 1 SREBRENICA DRINA EUROREGION............................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction - Starting points .............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Members of project team and their assignments ........................................................................ 4 2. Analysis of the current situation ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1 General information...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Relief ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3. Accessibility to destination .......................................................................................................... 8 2.4. SWOT analysis ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.4.1 Analysis of strengths ............................................................................................................ 10 2.4.2 Analysis of weaknesses - opportunities for investors .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Session 4 SRB Assessment
    Status of transboundary waters in South Eastern Europe Characterization Report on the Sava River Basin Dejan Komatina, Ph.D. Civ. Eng., Secretary, ISRBC General description of the basin • The Sava River Basin as a Danube sub-basin – Basin area: 95 720 km 2 (the second largest, after the Tisza basin) – Average flow (at the mouth): 1722 m 3/s (the largest tributary) – River length: 940 km (586 km of which were navigable before the war) Country Share of the Share of the basin (%) territory (%) Albania 0.1 0.5 Bosnia & Herzegovina 40 76 Croatia 26 45 Montenegro 7.5 52 Serbia 15.4 17 Slovenia 11 53 Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 2 Overview (location) of the SRB Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 3 Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 4 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 5 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 6 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 7 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 8 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 9 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 10 Land cover/land use in the SRB Land class % Artificial surfaces 2,23 Agricultural areas 42,36 Forests and semi natural areas 54,71 Wetland 0,08 Inland water 0,63 Int.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]