DOCSLIB.ORG

STEPHENS LAW OFFICE, PLLC 235 High Street #518 Monongahela Building Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 (304) 680-4055 [email protected] Bradley MI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STEPHENS LAW OFFICE, PLLC 235 High Street #518 Monongahela Building Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 (304) 680-4055 Steghens.Law.0Ffice@Gmail.Com Bradley MI STEPHENS LAW OFFICE, PLLC 235 High Street #518 Monongahela Building Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 (304) 680-4055 [email protected] Bradley MI. Stephens, Attorney March 17,2009 Sandra Squire, Executive Secretary Public Service Commission 201 Brooks Street P.Q. Box 812 Charleston, W 25323 Re: Case No. 08-2105-E-CS; AES New Creek, LLC Dear Nls. Squire: Please find enclosed for filing in the above referenced matter an original and twelve double-sided copies of "Allegheny Front Alliance's Viewpoint Descriptions for May 1,2009 Commission View of AES New Creek Project and Vicinity; which should be considered, for the purposes of the Commission's consideration, as an alternate "Exhibit A" to the "Joint Proposal for the Commission View of the New Creek Mountain Project Area," which is being filed today by counsel for AES New Creek. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. dley W. Stepheu Enclosure cc: All parties of record Allegheny Front Alliance’s Viewpoint Descriptions for Mav 1,2009 Commission View of AES New Creek LLC Proiect and Vicini@ The viewing tour begins at the Kimble’s General Store in Scherr and then proceeds west on State Route 42/93 to Viewpoint 1. Viewpoint 1. A residence off Route 42/93 on the road leading to Mount Storm The view looking east is from an elevation of approximately 1,870 feet and provides a clear elevated view of New Creek Mountain on the western side of the ridge. To the south is the crest of Greenland Gap. Moving north is AES’s southernmost met tower, and the first turbine would be located approximately 1,500 feet north of that point. In addition, the first turbine would be one mile north of the southernmost of the nearby 500-kV transmission lines, a distance requested by Greenland Lodge to provide an adequate buffer from the Greenland Gap preservation area. Parts of Corridor H can also be seen, and the AES access road would leave Corridor H and travel from left to right up the mountain to a point where the northern transmission line crosses the ridge. From this viewpoint, the first turbine is just over two miles away. Driving Route to Viewpoint 2 After descending SR 42/93, we will turn left on SR 93 and head generally north. County Road (CR 1) begins at Scherr and continues east towards Greenland Gap, running along Patterson Creek. At Scherr, New Creek Mountain is prominent to the east. Here, the famed 800-foot Oriskany Sandstone cliffs surrounding the mountain can be seen. Leaving Scherr, farms and residences can be seen along SR 93. The proposed project site is visible from the fields skirting the left side of the road. Approximately three miles on the left is the Oakdale Church of the Brethren (CR 42-2, Oakdale Road). New Creek Mountain is visible on the east (right) side of the road. SR 93 gradually ascends Walker Ridge to an elevation of 2068 feet, approximately 0.6 mile from the Oakdale Church. Viewpoint 2. Near Walker Ridge On the right side of SR 93 is Walker Ridge Road (CR-1). The pulloff at this location provides an expansive view from southeast to northeast of New Creek Mountain’s ridgeline. Driving Route to Viewpoint 3 Continue on SR 93 (north), ascend Walker Ridge and then de CR 42-2 (Oakdale Road). Turn left, travel west approximate 0.5 mil Nearby is a gated residential community. Viewpoint 3. New Creek Lake and Site 14 off Qakdale Road and New Creek Lake, a major fishing attraction, lies at an elevation of approximately 1670 feet. Looking northeast from approximately the center of the dam provides a partial view of New Creek Mountah and the northernmost AES met tower, which is located in Mineral County. The proposed location of the northemost turbines, which would be located in Grant County, is approximately 1,700 feet south of the met tower. Driving Route to Viewpoint 4 Return to SR 93, turn left and descend the mountain on SR 93 (north). The road offers a continuous wooded vista, with Walker Ridge visible to the west and New Creek Mountain to the east. Because the fall foliage is so striking here, this route becomes a primary tourist draw as the colors emerge. SR 93 leaves Grant County and enters ineral County. At the county line, looking west (left) the Allegheny Front is visible. New Creek Mountain remains on the right side (east). The northernmost turbine would be located less than one mile from SR 93 and the county line. SR 93 passes through Laurel Dale, home to a restored gristmill and prime camping spots, just over one mile from the closest proposed turbine. At the junction of SR 93 and US 50 is the community of Claysville. From Claysville, the nearest turbine would be situated approximately four miles away. Viewpoint 4. Log Cabin and Church at Claysville Claysville is home to a restored log cabin, as well as the Claysville U&ed Methodist Church. After the congregation organized in 1849, the church was constructed in 1850 from lumber cut at a water-powered sawmill. The interior of the church features hand-finished chestnut seats. In addition to a place of worship, the building has been used as a ~~mm~nitybuilding and a school. The building is in excellent preserved condition and is eligible for the National Register of Historical Places. A state road marker identifies the area. From the adjacent cemetery and the church, New Creek Mountain is visible looking south to southeast. Dolls Gap is also visible. Driving Route to Viewpoint 5 From Claysville Church, proceed on US 50 west to the top of the Allegheny Front. This is the highest point on US 50 in Mineral County. Viewpoint 5. Skyline and Saddle Mountain The summit of US 50, at over 2800 feet in elevation and known as “Skyline,” affords a sweeping panorama of New Creek Mountain, and beyond into Virginia. Here, 2 the West Virginia Division of Highways maintains a large, paved public viewing area, which is very popular with tourists and bird watchers. Driving Route to Keyser for Lunch Leave Skyline, proceed east on US 50, return to Claysville Junction and turn left onto SR 93 - US 50, following New Creek Valley into Keyser. Denny’s appears on the right. Driving Route to Viewpoint 4 The route to Viewpoint 6 is south on Route 220, east on Route 50 and then south on Knobley Road (CR-9), also known as Ridgeville. Travel from Ridgeville on Knobley Road southwest to the Antioch community (approximately 2.2 miles). At Antioch, turn ri&t onto Grayson Gap Road (CR-6-1). Follow road signs to (CR-6-1) left (south) following Penneroil Road to the Nancy Hanks birthplace memorial. Return by the same route to the Antioch community to Knobley Road (approximately 1.4 miles). Drive south on Knobley Road (CR-9) and cross into Grant County (CR-9 turn to County Road 3). Proceeding along Knobley Road, we will pass cemeteries, old farmhouses, and the Thorn Run Inn, a bed and breakfast built in 1871. Magnificent views of the mountains and farms are abundant along the road. Viewpoint 6. rest of New Creek ountain, inacludin location of AES Meteorological Tower (designated 8784)) This location affords a view west to the Allegheny Fore, a popular hiking destination. The view will then traverse along the ridge top along portions of the Project. Driving Route to Viewpoint 7 After descending New Creek Mountain, the drive proceeds south on Knobley Road, where there breaks in the hobs provide a spectacular views of New Greek Mountain. Continue through the town of Martin and then left on Belle Babb Lane. This route runs parallel with the 500 kV transmission lines. Belle Babb Lane (CR-2) goes past a public fishing area and a dam before joining Patterson Creek Road CR-5. Turn right on Patterson Creek Road CR-5 and drive south 1.7 miles to Medley. Viewpoint 7. Medley Located on Patterson Creek Road is the community of Medley, which is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historical Places. The sloping ridge and valley renders New Creek Mountain highly visible to the west and northwest. 3 Driving Route to Viewpoint 8 Drive south on Patterson Creek Road approximately 1.8 miles. Because of the height of New Creek Mountain and the gradual slope to the east, Patterson Creek Road presents a continuous view of New Creek Mountain. Turn right (west) to CR 3-3 road to Falls. Continue west to Greenland Gap. Viewpoint 8. Greenland Gap CR-3-3 traverses the Greenland Gap, a unique geological area with sheer rock outcroppings. The Nature Conservancy maintains and preserves 250 acres of land here. Several hiking trails lead the mountain summit. Canada yew and red elderberry are found along the streams mingthrough the Gap. (Time permitting, and at the Commission’s discretion, the Commission and the parties may stop at an available roadside area here. Otherwise, ahis viewpoint will be treated as a “rolling viewpoint.”) Driving Route for Return to Sclherr The return to Schen is via Belle Babb Lane, Knobley Road and then east on Greenland Gap Road. This route passes though Greenland Gap and provides an opportunity to see the construction progress of Conidor Pi. 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Bradley W. Stephens, certifl that on the 17th day of March, 2009, I served the foregoing “Allegheny Front Alliance's Viewpoint Descriptions for May 1,2009 Commission View of AES New Creek Project and Vicinity” by mailing the same, by First Class United States Mail, to the following: Christopher L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cacapon Settlement: 1749-1800 31
    THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 31 THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 31 5 THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 The existence of a settlement of Brethren families in the Cacapon River Valley of eastern Hampshire County in present day West Virginia has been unknown and uninvestigated until the present time. That a congregation of Brethren existed there in colonial times cannot now be denied, for sufficient evidence has been accumulated to reveal its presence at least by the 1760s and perhaps earlier. Because at this early date, Brethren churches and ministers did not keep records, details of this church cannot be recovered. At most, contemporary researchers can attempt to identify the families which have the highest probability of being of Brethren affiliation. Even this is difficult due to lack of time and resources. The research program for many of these families is incomplete, and this chapter is offered tentatively as a basis for additional research. Some attempted identifications will likely be incorrect. As work went forward on the Brethren settlements in the western and southern parts of old Hampshire County, it became clear that many families in the South Branch, Beaver Run and Pine churches had relatives who had lived in the Cacapon River Valley. Numerous families had moved from that valley to the western part of the county, and intermarriages were also evident. Land records revealed a large number of family names which were common on the South Branch, Patterson Creek, Beaver Run and Mill Creek areas. In many instances, the names appeared first on the Cacapon and later in the western part of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • TROUT Stocking – Lakes and Ponds Code No
    TROUT Stocking – Lakes and Ponds Code No. Stockings .......Period Code No. Stockings .......Period Code No. Stockings .......Period Q One ...........................1st week of March Twice a month .............. February-April CR Varies ...........................................Varies BW One ........................................... January M One each month ........... February-May One .................................................. May W Two..........................................February MJ One each month ............January-April One ........................................... January One each week ....................March-May Y One ................................................. April BA One each week ...................................... X After April 1 or area is open to public One ...............................................March F weeks of October 19 and 26 Lake or Pond ‒ County Code Lake or Pond ‒ County Code Anawalt – McDowell M Laurel – Mingo MJ Anderson – Kanawha BA Lick Creek – Wayne MJ Baker – Ohio Q Little Beaver – Raleigh MJ Barboursville – Cabell BA Logan County Airport – Logan Q Bear Rock Lakes – Ohio BW Mason Lake – Monongalia M Berwind – McDowell M Middle Wheeling Creek – Ohio BW Big Run – Marion Y Miletree – Roane BA Boley – Fayette M Mill Creek – Barbour M Brandywine – Pendleton BW-F Millers Fork – Wayne Q Brushy Fork – Pendleton BW Mountwood – Wood MJ Buffalo Fork – Pocahontas BW-F Newburg – Preston M Cacapon – Morgan W-F New Creek Dam 14 – Grant BW-F Castleman Run – Brooke, Ohio BW Pendleton – Tucker
    [Show full text]
  • Grant County Plan PC 12-5-13
    Grant County Plan Developed by the Grant County Planning Commission with the assistance of Aaron Costenbader, Kathryn Ferreitra, & Vishesh Maskey Under the direction of Michael John Dougherty, Extension Specialist & Professor Adopted March 2011 Revised July 2013 Grant County Plan Developed by the Grant County Planning Commission with the assistance of Aaron Costenbader, Kathryn Ferreitra, & Vishesh Maskey Under the direction of Michael John Dougherty, Extension Specialist & Professor Adopted March 2011 Revised July 2013 West Virginia University Extension Service Community Resources and Economic Development 2104 Agricultural Sciences Building PO Box 6108 Morgantown, WV 26506-6108 304-293-2559 (Voice) 304-293-6954 (Fax) [email protected] GRANT COUNTY PLAN Page I Grant County Plan Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Background ............................................................................................................................. 2 Planning Process ............................................................................................................................. 4 County Profile .............................................................................................................................. 5 Table 1: Historical Population ....................................................................................................... 5 Table 2: Comparative Population
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations Summary 2019
    WEST VIRGINIA FISHINGRegulations Summary 2019 wvdnr.gov From the Director Last year the DNR released an updated, online interactive map that provides valuable information on all aspects of fishing and hunting adventures. DNR personnel are continuing to update information and produce new, useful maps. After hearing about the need from anglers in an online survey, DNR personnel collected lake depth data and processed new bathymetry maps for 35 lakes across the state. These maps are now available on the interactive fishing map and downloadable to print or take with you on your mobile device. Also, anglers can now access the real-time streamflow conditions from the U.S. Geological Survey on our interactive fishing map. The real-time information allows anglers to check on flow and make decisions about whether fishing conditions are ideal before heading out to a stream or river. Visit wvdnr.gov/gis for more details and links to the interactive map and other map pages. You helped fund this project through the Sport Fish Restoration Program, using excise taxes on selected fishing equipment and boat fuel. I encourage you to take advantage of West Virginia’s abundant natural resources and go fishing every chance you get. And take a friend or family member with you. It’s a great way to relax and enjoy each other’s company. Stephen S. McDaniel, DNR Director DISTRICT OFFICES Main Office - South Charleston, WV 25303 324 4th Avenue Fish Management − Mark T. Scott (304) 558-2771 Law Enforcement − Col. Jerry Jenkins (304) 558-2784 License Unit − Michael Ingram (304) 558-2758 District 1 - Farmington, WV 26571 1110 Railroad Street (304) 825-6787 Fish Management − Dave Wellman Law Enforcement − Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Jennings Randolph Lake and Dam Operations on River Flow and Water Quality in the North Branch Potomac River
    The Influence of Jennings Randolph Lake and Dam Operations on River Flow and Water Quality in the North Branch Potomac River A Technical Report Supporting Preparation of a Comprehensive Scoping Plan Considering an Update of the Jennings Randolph Lake Water Control Plan December 18, 2019 Prepared by Claire Buchanan and Gordon Michael Selckmann Interstate Commission on the Potomac Basin 30 West Gude Dr., Suite 450 Rockville MD 20850 www.potomacriver.org North Branch Potomac River Flow and Water Quality Analysis ICPRB Report 19-4 This report can be downloaded from the Publications tab of the Commission’s website, www.potomacriver.org. To receive hard copies of the report, please write Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 30 West Gude Dr., Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 or call 301-984-1908. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policies of the U. S. Government, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Potomac basin states of Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia, and the District of Columbia, or the Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the River Basin. Acknowledgements We thank staff of West Virginia’s departments of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection, Maryland’s departments of Natural Resources and Environment, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District who reviewed and commented on the draft report. Funds to support this analysis came from the ICPRB Cooperative Water Supply Operations on the Potomac (COOP) section and the Clean Water Act '106 administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (I-983394-14).
    [Show full text]
  • Turtle Assemblages in the Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia with an Emphasis on Pseudemys Rubriventris (Leconte) Ashley Renea Fisher
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2007 Turtle Assemblages in the Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia with an Emphasis on Pseudemys rubriventris (LeConte) Ashley Renea Fisher Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Fisher, Ashley Renea, "Turtle Assemblages in the Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia with an Emphasis on Pseudemys rubriventris (LeConte)" (2007). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 1017. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Turtle Assemblages in the Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia with an Emphasis on Pseudemys rubriventris (LeConte) Thesis submitted to the Graduate College Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science Biological Sciences by Ashley Renea Fisher Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chair Dan Evans, Committee Member Jayme Waldron, Committee Member May 2007 Keywords: Northern Red-bellied Cooter, Natural History, Distribution Abstract Little is known about turtle assemblages in West Virginia, especially in the eastern panhandle. The only published work on Pseudemys rubriventris (Le Conte) in the state is by Green and Pauley (1987). Pseudemys rubriventris are considered an S2 species by the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources which means they are considered rare and imperiled in the state (WVDNR, Wildlife Diversity Program). Their range includes the Coastal Plains rivers of the mid-Atlantic region, from northern North Carolina to central New Jersey (Ernst et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire County West Virginia Post Offices
    Autumn 2010 35 Hampshire County West Virginia Post Offices Part 3 Communities (Post Offices) that are in present day Mineral County By Len McMaster There are several towns or post offices that are in- Previously I discussed a little of the history of Hamp- cluded in one or more of the various lists of Hamp- shire County, described the source of the data and the shire County post offices that are in present day Min- conventions used in the listings, and listed the post of- eral County. These include Burlington, Claysville, fices established in Hampshire County that are or Frankfort, Kelly’s, New Creek, New Creek Depot, would have been within its present day boundaries. New Creek Station, Paddytown, Rees Tannery, The introduction is repeated here. Sheetz’s Mill, Wardville, and Wind Lea. As with those Introduction in current day Hampshire County, some of these names are merely different names for the same com- Several people have previously cataloged the Hamp- munity served by the post office. shire County West Virginia post offices, generally as part of a larger effort to list all the post offices of West It is not clear why these particular post offices are Virginia. Examples include Helbock’s United States included in the Hampshire County lists. At first I Post Offices1 and Small’s The Post Offices of West thought that it was because the compiler intended to Virginia, 1792-19772. Confusing this study is that include all post offices established under the County’s Hampshire County was initially split off from Virginia name regardless of what county they may have been with the establishment of many early post offices ap- included in later; however, this would not explain why pearing in studies of Virginia post offices such as post offices such as Mount Carbon, Ridgeville, Abelson’s Virginia Postmasters and Post Offices, Pattersons Depot, Piedmont, and Hartmonsville, which 1789-18323 and Hall’s “Virginia Post Offices, 1798- were established in Hampshire County before Min- 1859”4; and that Hampshire County was itself even- eral County was created, were not included.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac Headwaters Water Quality Report July 1998 - June 2008
    West Virginia Department of Agriculture Gus R. Douglass, Commissioner Regulatory and Environmental Affairs Division West Virginia’s Potomac Headwaters Water Quality Report July 1998 - June 2008 Chesapeake Bay Program A Watershed Partenership *** West Virginia Department of Agriculture 60B Moorefield Industrial Park Road Moorefield, West Virginia 26836 304/538-2397 http://www.wvagriculture.org/ Maps created and report statistically analyzed and written by Amanda Sullivan, West Virginia Department of Agriculture Cover photos of the South Branch Potomac River taken by Kristy Strickler, West Virginia Department of Agriculture Funded by the West Virginia Department of Agriculture and the Chesapeake Bay Progarm Printed by the West Virginia Department of Agriculture, Communications Division he mission of the West Virginia Department of Agriculture is to protect Tplant, animal and human health and the state’s food supply through a variety of scientific and regulatory programs; to provide vision, strategic planning and emergency response for agricultural and other civil emergencies; to promote industrial safety and protect consumers through educational and regulatory programs; and to foster economic growth by promoting West Virginia agriculture and agribusinesses throughout the state and abroad. MISSION STATEMENT - 1 - Table of Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................3 Forward .................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac Stream Samplers
    2007 Data Report Potomac Stream Samplers Caring for Our Watersheds from the Mountains to the Sea A project of The Mountain Institute, in cooperation with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Image from the Potomac Conservancy website) Table of Contents About the Potomac Stream Samplers Program 3 Explanation of the data 4 Data summaries Big Run (Professional development workshop and student field trips) 8 Un-named tributary of Back Creek: Musselman High School 12 Patterson Creek: Frankfort Middle School 14 Conococheague Creek: Spring Mills Middle School Science Club 16 Potomac River: Spring Mills Middle School Science Club 16 Laurel Hill Creek: Rockwood High School 19 Bakers Run: East Hardy Middle/High School 21 Blackthorn Creek: Pendleton County Middle School 23 Whitethorn Creek: Pendleton County Middle School 26 Stream Status Maps 2007 29 2004 - 2007 30 Stream survey history 31 Photographs and participants list Professional development workshop 33 Musselman High School 35 Frankfort Middle School 37 Spring Mills Middle School Science Club 39 Rockwood High School 41 East Hardy Middle/High School 43 Pendleton County Middle School 45 About the Potomac Stream Samplers Program In 2004, The Mountain Institute (TMI) received funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to implement a watershed education project involving students and educators who live in West Virginia’s Potomac River watershed. As part of a broader effort to educate the public about the compromised and increasingly stressed health of the Chesapeake Bay, Potomac Stream Samplers was designed by TMI to raise awareness of the connection between regions within the Potomac River drainage and the Bay itself.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia State Wildlife Action Plan
    West Virginia State Wildlife Action Plan “What it is and How it Works” West Virginia State Wildlife Action Plan • For over 75 years federal excise taxes on hunting and fishing equipment have funded recovery of game fish and animals ($7 Million Annually). • <5% of West Virginia species are game • 2001 - Congress established State Wildlife Grant Program to help conserve the 95%. • Requires states to develop State Wildlife Plans to guide their actions. • First WV plan (2005) emphasized Inventory and Monitoring. • The 2015 plan emphasizes Conservation Actions. West Virginia State Wildlife Action Plan How the Plan Works; • Charts a course for conserving the diversity of fish and wildlife resources by emphasizing those species in greatest need of conservation. • Targets funding and management actions to prevent fish and wildlife populations from declining to point of endangerment. • Covers a 10 year span in what is a continuous adaptive management process for conserving the state’s fish and wildlife resources and the habitats that sustain them. West Virginia State Wildlife Action Plan Prepared By: • DNR Wildlife Diversity Staff • WVU Natural Resource Analysis Center Consulting Team • With assistance of: academic & other experts Core Advisory Team from various agencies/organizations West Virginia State Wildlife Action Plan Eight Required Elements 1) Lists and descriptions of SGCN and natural communities, including their distributions and abundance. 2) Locations and conditions of SGCN habitats. 3) Threats , and necessary research & survey efforts. 4) Prioritized conservation actions that will address threats. 5) Monitoring plans for SGCN, habitats, and conservation action effectiveness. 6) Procedures for reviewing & updating the SWAP. 7) Description of agency & organizational coordination in plan development & implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 County Ride Map!
    Berkeley Cumberland Springs 36 Potomac R Paw Paw 522 28 Cacapon R 220 Fort Ashby Five 9 WEST VIRGINIA46 29 Keyser 38 Jennings Little Cacapon R Castle 28 Rock Randolph 81 Lake Slanesville Ice Mountain 127 42 Burlington Romney 29 Fort Edwards 220 50 Capon 50 N Br Potomac R Bridge 522 24 50 Augusta 50 93 28 Patterson Cr 259 Fairfax Stone 42 Purgitsville 50 State Monument S Br Potomac R 90 Scherr Delray Knobley Rd. Greenland CR 7 Gap 93 Yellow Mt Storm 220 Spring Lake Medley 48 CR 6 North R Lahmansville The Trough Maysville Old 50 Fields Cacapon R Stormy 259 Winchester Res Patterson Creek Rd. 29 42 55 FR 75 Baker Fisher 55 Wardensville 81 Moorefield Lost River Sinks Red Creek Rec. Area Petersburg 259 FR 75 66 55 Lost R FR 19 Strasburg 7 Lost CR 28-11 River 28 Campground 81 South Mill Lake Lost Lost River 220 City 55 N Yokums 55 Smoke Hole Caverns Campground Smoke Hole Lost River Rec. Area State Park Mathias Gandy Cr Seneca S Fk S Br Potomac R Rocks South Mill Creek Rd. Riverton Spruce Knob Seneca 4861 33 Caverns (Highest Point in State) Reed's Creek Camp Run Trout Hatchery FR 112 Upper Tract Rec. Area Briery Gap Rd 33 Spruce Knob Buckhorn Lake Circleville 33 Trout Farm 259 Cherry Fort Seybert Grove Via Ferrata Nelson Rocks Franklin 28 Brandywine To I81 220 S Br Potomac R 33 FREE 5 County Ride Map! 1 Welcome Steeped in ancestral heritage, Grant, Hardy, Hampshire, Mineral and Pendleton counties are known for warm hospitality, breathtaking mountainous landscapes and abundant natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • CBCP Final West Virginia Annex
    CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER FINAL State of West RESOURCES AND Virginia Annex RESTORATION PLAN July 2019 This document was developed in coordination with multiple stakeholders, including the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the Chesapeake Bay Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, District of Columbia, States of Delaware, Maryland, New York and West Virginia, and Commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia. This page intentionally left blank. State and District of Columbia Analyses CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN STATE CHAPTER State of West Virginia July 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Section 1 ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Water Stressors ......................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 Section 2 Restoration Efforts Contributing to Watershed Wide Priorities .......................... 2-1 2.1 Vitals Habitats Goal .................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Outcome: Black Duck ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]