Water Talk 1/2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Talk 1/2005 New GWP CEE report Calendar of Events GWP CEE Council Meeting on public participation 9-10 April 2005 Krakow, Poland A NEW REPORT ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN terested parties in the implementation of the WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE EASTERN BAL- directive. This and other EU environmental pol- River Basin Management – progress towards im- TIC SEA REGION WAS PREPARED AS PART OF icy documents call for the wide partnership plementation of the Water Framework Directive GWP CEE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION TASK FORCE and participation of the society represented 19-20 May 2005 ACTIVITIES. by diverse stakeholder groups in environmen- Budapest, Hungary tal management. Public participation is rec- The conference focuses on the fresh water com- ognized as a tool that helps create awareness ponents of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), and ownership of decisions, which in turn is to review progress to date, share experience and necessary for their successful implementa- to identify possible future issues which may arise tion. Today a great number of examples (e.g. as the WFD is progressively implemented. CREDIT: P. UNT/PEIPSI CTC P. CREDIT: GWP Tool Box) prove that public participation strengthens democracy by showing stakehold- GWP Network meeting of the Consulting Partners ers that they can exert influence over the deci- 24-25 May 2005 sions that are made. The report gives an over- Antigua, Guatemala view on the progress of public involvement in The Consulting Partners meeting will focus on Lake Peipsi on the border between Estonia and Russia water management in Estonia, Latvia, Lithua- progress in preparing national Integrated Water nia and Poland. In addition, it analyzes public Resources Management (IWRM) and water effi- Recent years have seen the rapid growth of in- participation case studies and pilot projects ciency strategies by 2005. terest in public participation in a wide range and draws conclusions and recommendations of sectors and contexts, including environmen- for the future. The authors of the report are: Third International Symposium on Flood Defence tal management, agriculture and conservation. Janusz Topilko; Regional Water Management 25-27 May 2005 Public participation has gained wide recogni- Board, Gdansk, Poland; Dmitrij Zharkov, Cent- Nijmegen, The Netherlands tion on different levels of governance as a key er for Environmental Policy, Lithuania; Erika Scientists, engineers and administrators involved principle for water management. In 2000 the Lagzdina, The Regional Environmental Cent- in flood management are invited to participate. EU Water Framework Directive was adopted, er for CEE (REC) Latvia and Margit Säre, Peip- thus establishing a framework for community si Center for Transboundary Cooperation; International Conference on Hydrology, Ecology action in the field of water policy and stress- Estonia. You can find the full report on http:// and Water ing the importance of consultation with all in- www.riverdialogue.org/participation/ 20-23 June 2005 Bergen, Norway The conference will address a wide range of wa- ter related topics, linking together several themes GWP CEE celebrated World Water Day in rural development, and soil and water conser- IN THE OCCASION OF 22 MARCH WORLD WATER DAY, GWP CEE COUNTRY WATER PARTNERSHIPS vation. (CWPS) IN BULGARIA, CZECH REPUBLIC, ESTONIA, HUNGARY, LATVIA, LITHUANIA, POLAND, RO- MANIA, SLOVAKIA AND SLOVENIA ACTIVELY PROMOTED PRINCIPLES OF INTEGRATED WATER RE- Symposium for European freshwater sciences SOURCES MANAGEMENT (IWRM) THROUGH A SERIES OF NATIONAL AND LOCAL EVENTS. CWPs 22-16 August 2005 also participated in broader frame of celebrations together with other water stakeholders, e.g. Krakow, Poland GWP Lithuania organised drawing and photo competitions in close cooperation with local mu- The symposium will be devoted to basic questions nicipalities. GWP Bulgaria and their partners also contributed to 12th National Celebration of in freshwater biology and various aspects of ap- World Water Day in the capital city of Sofia, with presentations about IWRM, flash floods and plied freshwater science. economic aspects of EU Water Framework Directive. GWP Bulgaria also published an article about flash floods for “Water Affairs” magazine devoted specially to World Water Day. In Esto- SIWI Water Week nia, Estonian Water Association, Estonian Union of Waterworks and Ministry of the Environment 21-27 August 2005 organised a traditional Water Day conference. Main topics of the conference were floods and Stockholm, Sweden storms, in order to remind heavy storms which hit Baltic countries in the beginning of Janu- Water Symposium, a part of Stockholm Water ary 2005. Presentations covered a broach range of topics about marine environment, pollution, Week 2005, will explore the complementarities of floods and forecasting systems. In addition, Water Saving Prize was awarded for an outstanding soft and hard approaches in water management. success and model behaviour in water management. The relations between the water sector and other sectors of society will be of special relevance. efit from that support? How much money Interview with Raimonds Vejonis, is needed for improving and developing the environmental water infrastructure in the the Latvian Minister of Environment near future? IN CONTINUATION OF OUR SERIES OF INTER- year old Riga, the Riga Port is well known from The highest priority for acquiring EU Structur- VIEWS WITH THE MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRON- the Hansatic Union and the shipping channel al Funds and Cohesion Fund assistance is as- MENT FROM THE 10 CENTRAL AND EASTERN or ‘’fare water’’ which is artificially maintained signed to the development of municipal water EUROPEAN COUNTRIES, WHICH ARE PART OF by many hydro technical structures, all located supply and waste water collection and treat- GWP CEE REGION, WE BRING YOU THE INTER- roughly 20 kilometers from the sea. The build- ment systems in order to provide safe drinking VIEW WITH LATVIAN MINISTER OF THE ENVI- ings are stable and continue to work well; very water and ensure proper collection and treat- RONMENT, RAIMONDS VEJONIS. few accidents have been recorded over many ment of wastewater. With the assistance of the centuries. Only environmentally sustainable ISPA pre-accession financial instrument, water RAIMONDS VEJONIS studied Water and Envi- structures can survive under the pressure of services development projects are being imple- ronmental Management at the University of natural elements, therefore we can thank the mented in 23 towns and cities, but through the Tampere, Finland and graduated from the Uni- brilliant engineers from former generations. use of Cohesion Fund and ERDF co-financing - versity of Latvia. He has a strong background in During the last century we have built three water services will be developed in 67 agglom- biology, ecology and environmental engineer- ing. During his professional career he has held various senior level positions in governmental organizations in Latvia. Vejonis also has vast experience in implementing environmental in- frastructure projects such as wastewater treat- ment and waste disposal. He is currently a vice- chairman of the Green Party of Latvia. Water Talk: GWP defines Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) as a proc- ess which promotes the coordinated devel- opment and management of water, land and related resources, in order to maximize the resultant economic and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems. How do you see the challenges of IWRM implemen- tation in the practice in Latvia? If we are talking about water resources per large hydro power plants on the River Dau- erations with populations above 2000, and in capita, Latvia, along with Canada, Sweden and gava. On the one hand we have reduced our more than 120 agglomerations with popula- Russia, is one of the very rich countries. How- dependence on energy imports. On the other, tions below 2000. In order to fully implement ever, half of our surface waters have their ori- the Daugava was the biggest salmon river in legal requirements related to water infrastruc- gin in neighboring countries and trans-bound- the Baltic Sae area and one of the biggest in ture, estimates show that investments of over ary waters are strongly influenced by activities the world. Therefore nowadays we are trying 900 million euro will be required. outside Latvia and even the EU. Therefore we to integrate carefully not only fish resources are active not only in implementation of the but all the wealth of hydro biological resourc- Water Talk: WFD is the most complex set EU WFD but in supporting UN/ECE Water Con- es into water management. Latvia is located of goals, tools and commitments in the EU vention and other tools like the EU Water Initi- at the edge of inland waters and the sea and water sector to date. Two of the main WFD ative and the GWP. One could say that Latvia is we should bear in mind that not only the Gulf goals are the protection and improvement on the lucky side with a rather low population of Riga but the entire Baltic Sea is vulnerable. of water ecosystems quality and sustainable, density and an abundance of forests, including Therefore we must feel more responsible for balanced and equitable water use. This direc- swampy forests, and wetlands, marches and water resources management and introduce tive provides broad opportunities for public bogs, which are good preconditions for the IWRM as the best tool we can apply. participation in river basin management and successful development of IWRM. Neverthe- is probably transposed into Latvian legis- less, part of the country consists of lowlands, Water Talk: Implementation of EU legisla- lation. How could the participation of the similar to those in Holland, where settlements tion for the new members, which entered the public and NGO’s be ensured during imple- can be located and agriculture developed only EU in May 2004, means an opportunity for mentation of this directive and especially in after water regulation activities have been improving the environmental infrastructure preparation of river basin management plans successfully implemented.
Recommended publications
  • Promoting Payments for Ecosystem Services and Related Sustainable Financing Schemes in the Danube Basin
    Promoting Payments for Ecosystem Services and Related Sustainable Financing Schemes in the Danube Basin This project promotes and supports land managers who help us sustain the benefits that we all get from nature. The project is implemented by the WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme with the financial support of the GEF through UNEP, and of the European Commission Project Team No Name Position Place 1 Thomas Kaissl Head of Green Economy Vienna, Austria Programme 2 Orieta Hulea FW Team Leader Bucharest, Romania 3 Irene Lucius Senior Policy Coordinator Vienna, Austria 4 Pablo Gutman International Coordinator Washington, D.C., USA 5 Maya Todorova Project Manager Ruse, Bulgaria 6 Angelika Beranek Project Finance Manager Vienna, Austria 7 Olga Apostolova Project Communication Sofia, Bulgaria Responsible 8 Yulia Grigorova Project Coordinator Bulgaria Sofia, Bulgaria 9 Monia Martini Project Coordinator Romania Bucharest, Romania 10 Kipriela Kelorska Accountant Sofia, Bulgaria 11 Anisoara Cismascu Accountant Bucharest, Romania 12 Konstantin Ivanov BG Communication Responsible Sofia, Bulgaria 13 Ioana Betieanu RO Communication Responsible Bucharest, Romania 14 Stoyan Mihov BG Model site coordinator Belene, Bulgaria 15 Cristina Munteanu RO Model site 1 Coordinator Bucharest, Romania 16 Edit Pop RO Model site 2 Coordinator Baia Mare, Romania 17 Ivan Hristov BG FW technical expert Sofia, Bulgaria 18 Camelia Ionescu RO FW technical expert Bucharest, Romania 19 Raluca Dan RO Sustainable livelihoods Bucharest, Romania technical expert 20 Georgi Stefanov BG Climate change technical Sofia, Bulgaria expert 21 Duska Dimovic Danube basin WWF Technical Belgrade, Serbia Expert 22 Mikhailo Danube basin WWF Technical Odessa, Ukraine Nesterenko Expert .
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Rivers and Wetlands at Scale Results and Lessons from the Cross‑Sector Living Danube Partnership • July 2021
    RESTORING RIVERS AND WETLANDS AT SCALE RESULTS AND LESSONS FROM THE CROSS‑SECTOR LIVING DANUBE PARTNERSHIP • JULY 2021 WORKING TOGETHER FOR A LIVING DANUBE 1 WWF is an independent conservation organisation, with over 30 million followers and a global network active through local leadership in nearly 100 countries. Our mission is to stop the degradation of the earth’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the Gârla Mare erving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, and promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. See wwf.panda.org WWF Central & Eastern Europe (WWF‑CEE) covers seven countries and provides overall leadership and coordination for WWF’s engagement in the Danube and Carpathian eco‑regions. It includes legal entities in five countries (WWF‑Romania, WWF‑Hungary, CONTENTS WWF‑Bulgaria, WWF‑Slovakia and WWF‑Ukraine) and an Austrian‑registered association serving as secretariat. WWF‑CEE also manages WWF engagement in the Czech THE DANUBE 5 Republic and Moldova. See www.wwfcee.org INTRODUCTION 6 The Living Danube Partnership – core team: The Coca‑Cola Company Europe WHY RIVERS AND WETLANDS? 9 Sofia Kilifi, Therese Noorlander, Ulrike Sapiro, Peter Easton (technical consultant) THE LIVING DANUBE PARTNERSHIP 10 International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) Edith Hoedl, Helene Masliah Gilkarov KEY LESSONS FROM THE PARTNERSHIP 14 WWF‑CEE (regional leadership and coordination)
    [Show full text]
  • Organisations - Bulgaria
    Organisations - Bulgaria http://www.herein-system.eu/print/194 Published on HEREIN System (http://www.herein-system.eu) Home > Organisations - Bulgaria Organisations - Bulgaria Country: Bulgaria Hide all 1.1.A Overall responsibility for heritage situated in the government structure. 1.1.A Where is overall responsibility for heritage situated in the government structure? Is it by itself, or combined with other areas? Ministry's name: Ministry of Culture Overall responsibility: Overall responsibility Ministerial remit: Cultural heritage Culture Heritage 1.1.B Competent government authorities and organisations with legal responsibilities for heritage policy and management. Name of organisation: National Institute for Immovable Cultural Heritage Address: 7, Lachezar Stantchev str. Post code: 1113 City: Sofia Country: Bulgaria Website: www.ninkn.bg E-mail: [email protected] Approx. number of staff: 49.00 No. of offices: 1 Organisation type: Agency with legal responsibilities Governmental agency Approach Integrated approach Main responsibility: Yes Heritage management: Designation Permits Site monitoring Spatial planning Policy and guidance: Advice to governments/ministers Advice to owners 1 of 31 04/05/15 11:29 Organisations - Bulgaria http://www.herein-system.eu/print/194 Advice to professionals Legislation Support to the sector Research: Documentation Field recording (photogrammetry..) Inventories Post-excavation analysis Ownership and/or management No (maintenance/visitor access) of heritage properties: Learning and communication: Communication
    [Show full text]
  • Bolgarija V Slovenskih Očeh (1850–1914)
    SLOVENCI IN BOLGARI MED ZAHODNIMI IN VZHODNIMI VPLIVI SLOVENCI IN BOLGARI MED ZAHODNIMI IN VZHODNIMI VPLIVI UREDILA ŽARKO LAZAREVIĆ IN ALEŠ GABRIČ Ljubljana 2016 Slovenci in Bolgari med zahodnimi in vzhodnimi vplivi ZALOŽBA INZ Odgovorni urednik dr. Aleš Gabrič ZBIRKA VPOGLEDI 15 ISSN 2350-5656 Žarko Lazarević in Aleš Gabrič (ur.) SLOVENCI IN BOLGARI MED ZAHODNIMI IN VZHODNIMI VPLIVI Recenzenta ddr. Igor Grdina dr. Tanja Petrović Prevod iz bolgarščine Ljudmil Dimitrov Prevod iz angleščine Natalija Majsova Jezikovni pregled Ajda Gabrič Oblikovanje Barbara Bogataj Kokalj Založnik Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino Tisk Medium d.o.o. Naklada 300 izvodov Izid knjige je podprla Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 327(497.4:497.2)(082) 339.92(497.4:497.2)(082) SLOVENCI in Bolgari med zahodnimi in vzhodnimi vplivi / uredila Žarko Lazarević in Aleš Gabrič ; [prevod iz bolgarščine Ljudmil Dimitrov, prevod iz angleščine Natalija Majsova]. - Ljubljana : Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino, 2016. - (Zbirka Vpogledi, ISSN 2350-5656 ; 15) ISBN 978-961-6386-75-3 1. Lazarević, Žarko 288003840 © 2016, Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino Vse pravice so pridržane. Brez predhodnega pisnega dovoljenja izdajatelja je prepovedano reproduciranje, distribuiranje, dajanje v najem, javna priobčitev, objavljanje, predelava ali katera koli druga oblika uporabe tega dela ali njegovih delov, bodisi s fotokopiranjem, tiskanjem, snemanje ali shranitvijo in objavo v elektronski obliki. Predgovor VSEBINA Žarko Lazarević, Aleš Gabrič, Roumiana Preshlenova, Predgovor ................................... 5 1 Medsebojno spoznavanje in sodelovanje dveh južnoslovanskih narodov ........7 Peter Vodopivec, Bolgari in Bolgarija v slovenskih očeh (1850–1914) .......................... 9 Roumiana Preshlenova, Bolgari in Slovenci – primerjava v dobi nacionalizmov ........39 Marko Zajc, Slovensko slovanstvo v 19.
    [Show full text]
  • In Bulgaria – Plovdiv
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA International Scientific Research Journal of Ecology Special Edition 2 2019 Eight International Conference of FMNS (FMNS-2019) Modern Trends in Sciences South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Faculty of Mathematics & Natural Sciences Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, 26-30 June, 2019 UNION OF SCIENTISTS IN BULGARIA – PLOVDIV UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV PUBLISHING HOUSE ii International Standard Serial Number Online ISSN 1313-9940; Print ISSN 1314-0213 (from 2009-2015) Aim & Scope „Ecologia Balkanica” is an international scientific journal, in which original research articles in various fields of Ecology are published, including ecology and conservation of microorganisms, plants, aquatic and terrestrial animals, physiological ecology, behavioural ecology, population ecology, population genetics, community ecology, plant-animal interactions, ecosystem ecology, parasitology, animal evolution, ecological monitoring and bioindication, landscape and urban ecology, conservation ecology, as well as new methodical contributions in ecology. The journal is dedicated to publish studies conducted on the Balkans and Europe. Studies conducted anywhere else in the World may be accepted only as an exception after decision of the Editorial Board and the Editor-In-Chief. Published by the Union of Scientists in Bulgaria – Plovdiv and the University of Plovdiv Publishing house – twice a year. Language: English. Peer review process All articles included in “Ecologia Balkanica” are peer reviewed. Submitted manuscripts are sent to two or three independent peer reviewers, unless they are either out of scope or below threshold for the journal. These manuscripts will generally be reviewed by experts with the aim of reaching a first decision as soon as possible. The journal uses the double anonymity standard for the peer-review process.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 2.List of Participants Final 16 Sep 2009
    PLATINA SWP 5.3 Ruse Training Workshop: List of Participants Name Country Institution/Address Telephone numbers E-mail address EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG TREN, rue Cesare BERNABEI EC 0032 22958149 [email protected] 1 de Mot 24, 8/13, 1040 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG Regio, Olivier BAUDELET EC 0032 2 295 6870 [email protected] 2 1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Avenue de la Marieke VAN NOOD EC 0032 22984401 [email protected] 3 Beaulieu 5, 1049 Brussels Danube Commission, Benczur utca 25, Ivana TOMIC KUNC DC 0036 1 461 8014 [email protected] 4 1068 Budapest International Sava river Commission, Nova Dejan KOMATINA ISRBC 00385 14886960 [email protected] 5 Ves 11, 10000 Zagreb Central Commission for the Navigation of Gernot PAULI CCNR the Rhine, 2, Place de la République 0033 388522011 [email protected] 6 F-67082 Strasbourg via donau -Österreichische Wasserstraßen- Robert TÖGEL AUSTRIA Gesellschaft mbH, Donau-City-Straße 1, 0043(0)5043212612 [email protected] 7 1220 Wien, Austria via donau -Österreichische Wasserstraßen- Markus SIMONER AUSTRIA Gesellschaft mbH, Donau-City-Straße 1, 0043(0) 5043211607 [email protected] 8 1220 Wien, Austria 9 Elisabeth JAEGER AUSTRIA BOKU, Muthgasse 107, 1190 Vienna 0043 6507181597 [email protected] Ministry of Transport, Information Violeta HINOVA BULGARIA Technologies and Communications, 9, 00359 2 9409494 [email protected] 10 Dyakon Ignatiy Str., 1000 Sofia Ministry of Transport, Information Petar BENOV BULGARIA Technologies and Communications, 9, 00359 2 9409 880 [email protected] 11 Dyakon Ignatiy Str., 1000 Sofia Secondary professional school for Ivelina GEORGIEVA BULGARIA navigation and shipbuilding,SQ.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Introduction
    Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 AGRICULTURE ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Name: OSTROVIT S.A. ..................................................................................................................................... 7 AGRICULTURE ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Name: SC VIE-VIN VINJU MARE SRL ................................................................................................................ 8 AGRICULTURE ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Name: SC AUGER PETRUS SRL ......................................................................................................................... 9 AGRICULTURE .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Name: SC ARNAGRO SRL ............................................................................................................................... 10 AGRICULTURE ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Assessment of Nutrient Removal Capacities of Riverine Wetlands
    UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project Strengthening the Implementation Capacities for Nutrient Reduction and Transboundary Cooperation in the Danube River Basin Monitoring and Assessment of Nutrient Removal Capacities of Riverine Wetlands Project Component 4.3: Monitoring and Assessment of Nutrient Removal Capacities of Riverine Wetlands January, 2004 Prepared by: WWF International Danube-Carpathian Programme David Tickner, Thomas Hein, Helmut Kroiss, Jan Seffer, Philip Weller, Susanna Wiener, Isabel Wolte, Matthias Zessner PREFACE The long term goal of the DRP is, in short, to strengthen capacities of key Danube stakeholders and institutions to effectively and sustainably manage the Danube River Basin’s water resources and ecosystems for citizens of Danube countries. It is increasingly recognized that wetlands and floodplains provide important benefits both environmental as well as socio-economic. Wetlands and floodplains can be important for flood protection, tourism, fisheries, nature protection as well as for water quality. To some degree, wetlands and floodplains may serve as either a sink or a storage area for pollutants. Given that nutrient pollution is one of the most important transboundary problems within the DRB and the Black Sea ecosys tems, it is critical to know under what conditions such benefits as pollution reduction can be optimized (and at what cost.) A study supported by UNDP/GEF during the UNDP/GEF Pollution Reduction Programme (1997- 1999) carried out by WWF determined that over 80% of wetlands and floodplains have been lost during the last 100 years. Given this, there are many considerations to initiate wetland floodplain rehabilitation activities. Important to know is what are the benefits for rehabilitating a wetland/floodplain area (weighed against the costs!) The purpose of this assignment was to identify and develop appropriate methodologies for assessing nutrient removal in wetland areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivan Hristov Vromos.Pdf
    Подводни археологически проучвания в залива Вромос, акватория на гр. Черноморец (Емпорион в хората на Аполония Понтика) 1 Underwater archaeological researches in the gulf of Vromos, aquatory of Chernomoretz (An emporium in the chora of Apollonia Pontica) 1 Киата изаа фиаата ка а Ктт а Чц © / Ivan Hristov, 2014, © UNICART / Published by UNICART, 2014 ISBN 978-954-2953-32-6 : Authors: , Ivan Hristov, , Pavlina Devlova, я , Iliya Kirov, , Boyka Zlateva, Georgi Ribarov : Maps: . , engineer Toty Angelov, . , engineer Hristo Michev, . engineer Mladen Todorov я: Graphic documentation: , Ivan Hristov, я , Iliya Kirov, , Yana Mutafchieva, , Pavlina Devlova, Rosen Vlasev : Photograph: , Ivan Hristov, , Victor Nalbantov, Todor Dimitrov : Translated by: Tsveta Raychevska : Prepress: Plamen Kastelov : Cover Design: я Anastasia Kartaleva 2 Подводни археологически проучвания в залива Вромос, акватория на гр. Черноморец (Емпорион в хората на Аполония Понтика) 1 Underwater archaeological researches in the gulf of Vromos, aquatory of Chernomoretz (An emporium in the chora of Apollonia Pontica) 2014 3 CONTENTS Introduction Ivan Hristov .......................................................................................7 I. Location Ivan Hristov .......................................................................................9 II. History and methodology of the researches Ivan Hristov ..................................................................................... 21 III. Archaeological material from the pre-Roman
    [Show full text]
  • Ghid CDST En.Cdr
    EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INVESTING IN YOUR FUTURE! RELIGIOUS TOURISM IN THE CROSS-BORDER REGION ROMANIA-BULGARIA GUIDE BULGARIA 3 4 VIDIN DISTRICT Introduction Vidin district is located in the northwest of Bulgaria, on the border with Serbia (west) and Romania (northeast). The district has an area of 3,032 km2, representing 2.73% of the total area of the country. Vidin has the lowest number of inhabitants / km2 compared to other districts in Bulgaria, the population of the area being 86,927 inhabitants in 2018, according to Eurostat. The district is structured into 10 municipalities on the territory of which 7 cities were constituted - the administrative center is Vidin city located on the Danube river bank. Vidin district has a rich and turbulent history, considering its strategic and geographical importance for the consolidation and definition of the Bulgarian state since the Middle Ages, the territory being a military, transport and commercial center for over 2,000 years. Thus on its territory there are numerous archaeological remains, among the most famous being the Baba Vida Fortress (the only medieval castle in Bulgaria fully preserved, over 2,000 years old), the Castra Martis Fortress (built during the Roman and Byzantine periods, centuries I-VI), the Kaleto Fortress (among the best preserved fortresses in Bulgaria), the ruins of the Roman city Ratiaria (an important gold trading center). The Regional History Museum in Vidin is also an important element of cultural and historical heritage. In the Vidin district numerous pilgrimages can be made, the most famous places of religious worship located in this area being Albotina Monastery in the Danube Plain (dug in the rock), Monastery "The Assumption of the Virgin Mary" (in whose courtyard there is a spring with curative properties).
    [Show full text]
  • Contestations Over Macedonian Identity, 1870–1912
    VICTORIA UNIVERSITY CONTESTATIONS OVER MACEDONIAN IDENTITY, 1870–1912 by NICK ANASTASOVSKI A THESIS SUBMITTED TO VICTORIA UNIVERSITY IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES MELBOURNE, VICTORIA MAY, 2005 2 STUDENT DECLARATION I, Nick Anastasovski, declare that the thesis entitled Contestations over Macedonian Identity 1870–1912 is no more than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, figures, appendices and references. This thesis contains no material that has been submitted previously, in whole or in part, for the award of any other academic degree or diploma. Except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is my own work. Nick Anastasovski May 2005 3 DEDICATION To my wife Sophie whose support and encouragement made the study possible 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract 9 Acknowledgments 11 Glossary of terms 13 List of maps 28 List of tables 32 List of illustrations 39 List of photographs 40 Introduction 42 Context 42 Summary 48 Chapter One: Colonisation and Islamicisation 55 1.1 Colonisation and Islamicisation 55 1.2 Religion and nationality 92 Chapter Two: Peoples and Populations 99 2.1 Peoples of Macedonia 99 Macedonians: The contested majority 99 Vlahs: Romanian or Greek, a contested minority 107 5 Greeks: Fishermen, farmers or townsfolk? 112 Turks and Albanians: The colonists 114 Gypsies and Jews: The uncontested 120 2.2 Conflicts around population data 124 Territorial boundaries 124 2.3 Population statistics 128 Ottoman Turkish population data 128 Population statistics advocated
    [Show full text]