An Anarchist Manifesto

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Anarchist Manifesto K. H. Z. SOLNEMAN (Kurt H. Zube, 1905-1991) An Anarchist Manifesto THE MANIFESTO OF PEACE AND FREEDOM The alternative to the Communist Manifesto Note Translated from the German by Doris Pfaff and John Zube. Edited by Edward Mornin. First published by the MACKAY- GESELLSCHAFT, Freiburg/Br., West Germany in 1977. This book won the First Alternative Peace Prize at the Alternative Book Fair in Frankfurt/M., West Germany, in 1977 Presentation This work begins with a clarification of much used — and mis-used — concepts such as: FREEDOM, FORCE, and ANARCHY. It launches a critical attack upon prevalent stereotyped ideas about the nature of the modern State. It goes on to present new thought- processes as well as concrete suggestions for the realization of equal freedom for all: 1) Equal access to natural resources and distribution of the land-rent to everyone (especially in the cities); 2) Freedom of the means of exchange (of money and credit); 3) Open associations of management (and absurdity of unemployment); 4) Autonomous legal and social communities (genuine pluralism and freedom of choice). Above all, THE MANIFESTO offers an alternative way of thinking, which is necessary if we are to avoid catastrophe. Laying the basis for new social relationships upon general agreement instead of ideology, it presents the reader with an inevitable choice: either the law of the sword and aggressive force — or non-domination and equal freedom! 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ESSENTIAL TERMS 1. EITHER - OR! 2. ILLUSION AND REALITY Domination by Abstract and Fixed Ideas The Realistic Starting Point Confucius Against Confusion The Fixed Idea of Domination 3. IDEOLOGY AND REALITY OF THE STATE The Main Functions of the State: Suppression and Exploitation The State as Caretaker and Patron The State as Criminal Is the State a Necessary Evil? 4. THE IDEOLOGY OF MARXISM AND ITS CONTRADICTIONS TO REALITY Refuted Predictions and False Contentions The Process of Production, Realistically Seen and How Exploitation Can Be Avoided The End of an Illusion 5. THE IDEOLOGY OF DEMOCRACY AND ITS CONTRADICTIONS TO REALITY How The Real Whole Can Make Decisions To Everyone the State of His Dreams! 6. THE NEW FIRST PRINCIPLE - FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HUMAN HISTORY: A FIRM FOUNDATION The Fundamental Difference Between "Is" and "Ought" The Answer to Pilate's Question The New Question and the Inescapable Alternative Too Much Asserted — Too Much Demanded? 7. THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE EQUAL FREEDOM OF ALL Equal Freedom of All as Regards Land Equal Freedom of All in the Exchange of the Products of Labour The "Sovereign Functions " of the State Autonomous Protective and Social Communities New Formulation of Human Rights Open Productive Associations (OPA Enterprises) 2 8. REAL ANARCHISM AND ITS AIMS The Criterion for Genuine Anarchism The Unique Feature of Anarchism The Starting Point and the Pivot Upon Which Everything Turns The Social Order of Anarchism Anarchism — A Socialistic System "Anarchists" Who Are Not Anarchists 9. THE ROAD TO ANARCHY - TO A SOCIETY WITHOUT CLASSES AND WITHOUT DOMINATION Emancipation from the State 10. AN APPEAL BY THE ANARCHISTS TO EVERYBODY Liberals and Social Reformers The Communist Manifesto A Necessary Distinction 11. THE INDISPENSABLE PRECONDITION FOR PEACE 3 ESSENTIAL TERMS used in this book "If we want to discuss any important and interesting topic for an hour, then we ought first to spend four hours reaching agreement on the terms to be used. Otherwise we will talk past each other." (Prof. Carl Ludwig Schleich) The following concepts will be used as defined below: FREEDOM: This is not a subjective, but an objective and quite exactly definable concept when we are dealing with freedom in a social context. Either my freedom is greater than that of another person, by occurring at his or their expense (in which case they are not free) or it is less than that of another person or group, at my expense (in which case I am not free). In either case there is no state of freedom. Freedom can, therefore, mean nothing other than equal freedom (not equality!) for all — which is essentially identical with non-domination. DOMINATION: is a state of unequal freedom. Here the freedom of some is greater than the freedom of others and occurs at their expense and against their will. Thus a condition of unequal freedom which exists with the consent of the disadvantaged is not domination. FORCE: is the physical or mental coercion exercised in an aggressive way, e.g. by injuring the equal freedom sphere of others. Defence against such aggression, including physical means, should thus not be considered as force. METAPHYSICS: This comprises all concepts and doctrines which go beyond the realm of sensibly and logically graspable experienced reality and which, therefore, cannot be proven either true or false. Here one may leave open the question as to whether these concepts and doctrines expressing a subjective reality of experience and transcendent reality also represent an actual reality, perhaps even the true reality, or whether they are merely vacuous games of thought. When something cannot be proven with the standards of experienced reality then one can just as easily assert its opposite. IDEOLOGIES: are statements which — like metaphysical statements — are, in essence or subject, beyond empirical proof or refutation because they contain at least some elements which go beyond experienced reality. DEMOCRACY: is an ideology which submits the interests of individuals to the pretended interest of a majority, or of the abstractions "people" or "state." It is a system of domination which, to be sure, lets the representatives of the new gods "people," "state," and "humanity" be elected by individuals, but expressly exempts them from any contractual obligation towards their voters. Democracy pre-supposes and aims at a state of unequal freedom. ANARCHY: is a state of non-domination. Since there has never been such a state in a consistent form, the assertion that it would be identical with disorder, or even with chaos, does not express an experienced fact but amounts only to polemics and demagogy on the part of those who proclaim domination a necessity. ANARCHISM: is a concept distorted by arbitrary mis-interpretations. Real anarchism sees in freedom not the daughter but the mother of order. It is not an ideology but begins with provable facts which lead to an unavoidable conclusion. (Kant: "Anarchism is freedom without violence.") 4 Chapter 1 Either - Or! The peaceful and bloodless revolution of the 20th century which will lead to a true world revolution differs by its radicalism from all preceding ones, which were actually only revolts. It goes to the roots of the establishment. For it brings not only some liberties but full and complete freedom, real freedom. It does not replace previous domination by a new domination, but brings non-domination for each and all. It frees not only abstract groups or classes but, without exception, all individuals. It proceeds not from an ideological basis but from a logically unassailable one. It therefore differs from all previous revolutions in its starting point, means and end, and will also supply a surprisingly simple answer to Pilate's old question: "What is truth?" It states only incontestable facts, which for many will mean saying goodbye to untenable ideas and accustomed ways of thinking. However, these facts can give everyone what he most lacked up to now — though without always being conscious of the lack. For the logical conclusion of these facts points to the unavoidable alternative: the alternative between aggressive force and agreement — on the only possible lasting basis! For the first time in human history a basis is offered on which different world views, religions, moral systems and ideologies meet and not only can but must agree. For who can dare to declare himself openly an adherent of the law of the club and of aggressive force? On this new, unshakable basis, from a surprising as well as a convincing point of view, there follows the description of a social state which is without domination not because it is classless, but is classless because it is without domination. Marx and his successors failed to describe such a society or even to think it through consistently. Since the Greek word AN-ARCHY was chosen because of its meaning as the appropriate designation of this state, one should first of all exclude all notions which are normally associated with this concept. For it has to do neither with chaos nor with force, and not at all with terrorism. What has been and is considered "anarchistic" and "anarchy" is — with only relatively few exceptions — a distorted image of the real anarchism and rather the very opposite of it. One could even present the consequences developed here as what is actually meant by true democracy (which, of course, does not agree at all with the present reality of democracy). A clever Frenchman once said: In the future there will be only two groups of people — those who want to live by their own work, and those who want to live by the work of others. More appropriately and inclusively one could say: A line is to be drawn between 5 those who want to enlarge their own sphere of freedom by force, at the expense of the freedom of others, or wish to maintain a state which already ensures such an im-balance of freedom, and those whose goal is the equal freedom of everyone, and who, therefore, do not require additional freedom for themselves at the expense of the freedom of others. A condition of equal freedom for everyone (in which, for example, unemployment is as absurd as it is impossible) needs no dictatorship. On the contrary, it cannot tolerate a dictatorship.
Recommended publications
  • Fighting for France's Political Future in the Long Wake of the Commune, 1871-1880
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2013 Long Live the Revolutions: Fighting for France's Political Future in the Long Wake of the Commune, 1871-1880 Heather Marlene Bennett University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Bennett, Heather Marlene, "Long Live the Revolutions: Fighting for France's Political Future in the Long Wake of the Commune, 1871-1880" (2013). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 734. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/734 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/734 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Long Live the Revolutions: Fighting for France's Political Future in the Long Wake of the Commune, 1871-1880 Abstract The traumatic legacies of the Paris Commune and its harsh suppression in 1871 had a significant impact on the identities and voter outreach efforts of each of the chief political blocs of the 1870s. The political and cultural developments of this phenomenal decade, which is frequently mislabeled as calm and stable, established the Republic's longevity and set its character. Yet the Commune's legacies have never been comprehensively examined in a way that synthesizes their political and cultural effects. This dissertation offers a compelling perspective of the 1870s through qualitative and quantitative analyses of the influence of these legacies, using sources as diverse as parliamentary debates, visual media, and scribbled sedition on city walls, to explicate the decade's most important political and cultural moments, their origins, and their impact.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN ZUBE and MICROFICHE [Editor's Note: These Remarks Are Sparked by an Interview Century
    The Voluntaryist Vol. 4, No. 1 Whole #19 "If one takes care of the means, the end will take care of itself. June, 1986 Legitimacy and Elections by Theodore J. Lowi the recent electoral conflagration. But the big problem with governing through military force is that (Editor's Note: Recent events in the Philippines have offered a it is expensive. It costs a lot to keep so many troops and to have validation of the voluntaryist insight, that all tyranny and govern- to put them on the alert so often. It's a whole lot cheaper if you ment are grounded on general popular acceptance. Two points are can do the same job without so much use of force. noteworthy. First, when the Marcos regime lost its legitimacy, it That's where legitimacy comes in, and, at the risk of violating lost its power to rule. Second, nonviolence played a large role in Stewart's Law, I am actually going to try to define it. depriving Marcos of the presidency of the Philippines. As Gene First of all, legitimacy is not mere popularity, although popularity Sharp has recently written in his new book, Making Europe helps. Legitimacy is not mere acceptance; acceptance is an out- Conquerable (Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing, 1985): "Denial of come of legitimacy. Legitimacy is not the mere absence of disord- legitimacy, refusal of obedience, and noncooperation by the gen- er, although the presence of disorder can be taken as an indica- eral populace, by the societal institutions...can effectively pre- tion of illegitimacy. And legitimacy is not the same as goodness or vent the political consolidation and control that make" domestic virtue, but that does point us in the right direction: Legitimacy is tyranny possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchism in Australia
    The Anarchist Library (Mirror) Anti-Copyright Anarchism in Australia Bob James Bob James Anarchism in Australia 2009 James, Bob. “Anarchism, Australia.” In The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest: 1500 to the Present, edited by Immanuel Ness, 105–108. Vol. 1. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Gale eBooks (accessed June 22, 2021). usa.anarchistlibraries.net 2009 James, B. (Ed.) (1983) What is Communism? And Other Essays by JA Andrews. Prahran, Victoria: Libertarian Resources/ Backyard Press. James, B. (Ed.) (1986) Anarchism in Australia – An Anthology. Prepared for the Australian Anarchist Centennial Celebra- tion, Melbourne, May 1–4, in a limited edition. Melbourne: Bob James. James, B. (1986) Anarchism and State Violence in Sydney and Melbourne, 1886–1896. Melbourne: Bob James. Lane, E. (Jack Cade) (1939) Dawn to Dusk. N. P. William Brooks. Lane, W. (J. Miller) (1891/1980) Working Mans’Paradise. Syd- ney: Sydney University Press. 11 Legal Service and the Free Store movement; Digger, Living Day- lights, and Nation Review were important magazines to emerge from the ferment. With the major events of the 1960s and 1970s so heavily in- fluenced by overseas anarchists, local libertarians, in addition Contents to those mentioned, were able to generate sufficient strength “down under” to again attempt broad-scale, formal organiza- tion. In particular, Andrew Giles-Peters, an academic at La References And Suggested Readings . 10 Trobe University (Melbourne) fought to have local anarchists come to serious grips with Bakunin and Marxist politics within a Federation of Australian Anarchists format which produced a series of documents. Annual conferences that he, Brian Laver, Drew Hutton, and others organized in the early 1970s were sometimes disrupted by Spontaneists, including Peter McGre- gor, who went on to become a one-man team stirring many national and international issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Anarchist Studies
    Contemporary Anarchist Studies This volume of collected essays by some of the most prominent academics studying anarchism bridges the gap between anarchist activism on the streets and anarchist theory in the academy. Focusing on anarchist theory, pedagogy, methodologies, praxis, and the future, this edition will strike a chord for anyone interested in radical social change. This interdisciplinary work highlights connections between anarchism and other perspectives such as feminism, queer theory, critical race theory, disability studies, post- modernism and post-structuralism, animal liberation, and environmental justice. Featuring original articles, this volume brings together a wide variety of anarchist voices whilst stressing anarchism’s tradition of dissent. This book is a must buy for the critical teacher, student, and activist interested in the state of the art of anarchism studies. Randall Amster, J.D., Ph.D., professor of Peace Studies at Prescott College, publishes widely in areas including anarchism, ecology, and social movements, and is the author of Lost in Space: The Criminalization, Globalization , and Urban Ecology of Homelessness (LFB Scholarly, 2008). Abraham DeLeon, Ph.D., is an assistant professor at the University of Rochester in the Margaret Warner Graduate School of Education and Human Development. His areas of interest include critical theory, anarchism, social studies education, critical pedagogy, and cultural studies. Luis A. Fernandez is the author of Policing Dissent: Social Control and the Anti- Globalization Movement (Rutgers University Press, 2008). His interests include protest policing, social movements, and the social control of late modernity. He is a professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Northern Arizona University. Anthony J. Nocella, II, is a doctoral student at Syracuse University and a professor at Le Moyne College.
    [Show full text]
  • Noam Chomsky Articulates a Clear, Uncompromising Defense of the Libertarian Socialist (Anarchist) Vision
    This classic talk delivered in 1970 has never seemed more current. In it Noam Chomsky articulates a clear, uncompromising defense of the libertarian socialist (anarchist) vision. NOAM CHOMSKY GOVERNMENT IN THE FUTURE ceros press department of republication on the high seas Government in the Future Talk given at the Poetry Center, New York City, Feb. 16, 1970 I think it is useful to set up as a framework for discussion four somewhat idealized positions with regard to the role of the state in an advanced industrial society. I want to call these positions: 1. Classical Liberal 2. Libertarian Socialist 3. State Socialist 4. State Capitalist and I want to consider each in turn. Also, I'd like to make clear my own point of view in advance, so that you can evaluate and judge what I am saying. I think that the libertarian socialist concepts, and by that I mean a range of thinking that extends from left-wing Marxism through to anarchism, I think that these are fundamentally correct and that they are the proper and natural extension of classical liberalism into the era of advanced industrial society. In contrast, it seems to me that the ideology of state socialism, i.e. what has become of Bolshevism, and that of state capitalism, the modern welfare state, these of course are dominant in the industrial societies, but I believe that they are regressive and highly inadequate social theories, and a large number of our really fundamental problems stem from a kind of incompatibility and inappropriateness of these social forms to a modern industrial society.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Economics in a Nutshell Lorenzo Garbo, Dorene Isenberg, and Nicholas Reksten
    Principles of Economics in a Nutshell Lorenzo Garbo, Dorene Isenberg, and Nicholas Reksten Suggested Readings Chapter 1: More Than Just the Stock Market. Introduction to Economics Brown, Claire (2017) Buddhist Economics. An Enlightened Approach to the Dismal Science, London: Bloomsbury Press. Diersmeier, Claus and Michael Pirson (2009) “Oikonomia Versus Chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle About the Future Orientation of Business Management,” Journal of Business Ethics, 88: 417-430. Daly, Herman E. and John B. Cobb Jr. (1994) For the Common Good, Boston: Beacon Press. Dobb, Maurice (1973) Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith. Ideology and Economic Theory, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Friedman, Milton (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: Chicago University Press. Gabriel, Mary (2011) Love and Capital. Karl and Jenny Marx and the Birth of a Revolution, New York: Back Bay Books. Giddens, Anthony (1976) “Introduction,” in Max Weber’s The protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, pp. vii-xxvi, London: Routledge (Reprint 1992). Heilbroner, Robert (1996) “Adam Smith,” in Teachings from the Worldly Philosophy, pp. 55- 105, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. Heilbroner, Robert (1996) “Karl Marx,” in Teachings from the Worldly Philosophy, pp. 159-195, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. Heilbroner, Robert (1996) “John Maynard Keynes,” in Teachings from the Worldly Philosophy, pp. 264-296, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. Heilbroner Robert and Peter Boettke (2018) “Economic System,” in Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/economic-system. Letwin, William (1964) The Origins of Scientific Economics, Garden City (NY): Doubleday & Company, Inc. Lutz, Mark and Kenneth Lux (1988) Humanistic Economics: The New Challenge, Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commune Movement During the 1960S and the 1970S in Britain, Denmark and The
    The Commune Movement during the 1960s and the 1970s in Britain, Denmark and the United States Sangdon Lee Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History September 2016 i The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement ⓒ 2016 The University of Leeds and Sangdon Lee The right of Sangdon Lee to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ii Abstract The communal revival that began in the mid-1960s developed into a new mode of activism, ‘communal activism’ or the ‘commune movement’, forming its own politics, lifestyle and ideology. Communal activism spread and flourished until the mid-1970s in many parts of the world. To analyse this global phenomenon, this thesis explores the similarities and differences between the commune movements of Denmark, UK and the US. By examining the motivations for the communal revival, links with 1960s radicalism, communes’ praxis and outward-facing activities, and the crisis within the commune movement and responses to it, this thesis places communal activism within the context of wider social movements for social change. Challenging existing interpretations which have understood the communal revival as an alternative living experiment to the nuclear family, or as a smaller part of the counter-culture, this thesis argues that the commune participants created varied and new experiments for a total revolution against the prevailing social order and its dominant values and institutions, including the patriarchal family and capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Berliner Anarchistisches Jahrbuch 2012
    EDITORIAL EDITORIAL Liebe Genoss*innen, werte Öffentlichkeit! um sechsten Mal erscheint nun zelpersonen riefen Vorträge, Demos le Essenzen anarchistischer Strömun- unser „Dokument A – Berliner und andere Aktivitäten zu diesem The- gen und Bewegungen verschiedenster Z anarchistisches Jahrbuch“, mit ma ins Leben. Zusätzlich sorgte auch Gruppen und Einzelpersonen in einem dem wir euch die anarchistischen- Ak eine Gruppe von Senior*innen da- Jahrbuch zu vereinen. So gibt es auch tivitäten im Berlin des Jahres 2012 prä- für, dass sich das stereotype Bild von wie im letzten Jahr neben den von den sentieren. Hausbesetzer*innen veränderte und Gruppen eingebrachten Texten wieder diese Thematik ebenfalls in Medien eine Liste anarchistischer Veranstal- Nachdem sich im August diesen Jah- und „Normalgesellschaft“ einen Auf- tungen und Publikationen aus dem res, in St. Imier, Anarchist*innen aus schwung erhielt. Diese von der Politik Raum Berlin. der ganzen Welt versammelten, um zu geschaffenen und auf dem Rücken der debattieren und sich auszutauschen, Menschen ausgetragenen Machtkämp- Um auch weiterhin eine breite Masse und dieses Treffen auch in den Medi- fe sorgten dafür, dass sich in verschie- zu erreichen, wird unsere Kooperation en vielfach Beachtung erhielt, rückte densten gesellschaftlichen Bereichen mit dem Verlag Edition AV fortgesetzt, der Anarchismus auch in diesem Jahr Menschen vernetzten und gemeinsam sodass unser Dokument A dieses Jahr wieder in den Blickpunkt, nicht nur bei versuchten, dieser Entwicklung ent- wieder unter der ISSN: 2193-7850 zu Menschen, die mit der Thematik ver- gegenzutreten. Aber auch kleinere beziehen ist. traut sind, sondern auch viel mehr in Themenbereiche finden ihren Einzug der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit. in das diesjährige Dokument A.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature
    i “Any Minute Now the World’s Overflowing Its Border”: Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature by Anna Elena Torres A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the Graduate Theological Union in Jewish Studies and the Designated Emphasis in Women, Gender and Sexuality in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Chana Kronfeld, Chair Professor Naomi Seidman Professor Nathaniel Deutsch Professor Juana María Rodríguez Summer 2016 ii “Any Minute Now the World’s Overflowing Its Border”: Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature Copyright © 2016 by Anna Elena Torres 1 Abstract “Any Minute Now the World’s Overflowing Its Border”: Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature by Anna Elena Torres Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the Graduate Theological Union in Jewish Studies and the Designated Emphasis in Women, Gender and Sexuality University of California, Berkeley Professor Chana Kronfeld, Chair “Any Minute Now the World’s Overflowing Its Border”: Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature examines the intertwined worlds of Yiddish modernist writing and anarchist politics and culture. Bringing together original historical research on the radical press and close readings of Yiddish avant-garde poetry by Moyshe-Leyb Halpern, Peretz Markish, Yankev Glatshteyn, and others, I show that the development of anarchist modernism was both a transnational literary trend and a complex worldview. My research draws from hitherto unread material in international archives to document the world of the Yiddish anarchist press and assess the scope of its literary influence. The dissertation’s theoretical framework is informed by diaspora studies, gender studies, and translation theory, to which I introduce anarchist diasporism as a new term.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anarchists: a Picture of Civilization at the Close of the Nineteenth Century
    John Henry Mackay The Anarchists: A Picture of Civilization at the Close of the Nineteenth Century 1891 The Anarchist Library Contents Translator’s Preface ......................... 3 Introduction.............................. 4 1 In the Heart of the World-Metropolis .............. 6 2 The Eleventh Hour.......................... 21 3 The Unemployed ........................... 35 4 Carrard Auban ............................ 51 5 The Champions of Liberty ..................... 65 6 The Empire of Hunger........................ 87 “Revenge! Revenge! Workingmen, to arms! . 112 “Your Brothers.” ...........................112 7 The Propaganda of Communism..................127 8 Trafalgar Square ...........................143 9 Anarchy.................................153 Appendix................................164 2 Translator’s Preface A large share of whatever of merit this translation may possess is due to Miss Sarah E. Holmes, who kindly gave me her assistance, which I wish to grate- fully acknowledge here. My thanks are also due to Mr. Tucker for valuable suggestions. G. S. 3 Introduction The work of art must speak for the artist who created it; the labor of the thoughtful student who stands back of it permits him to say what impelled him to give his thought voice. The subject of the work just finished requires me to accompany it with a few words. *** First of all, this: Let him who does not know me and who would, perhaps, in the following pages, look for such sensational disclosures as we see in those mendacious speculations upon the gullibility of the public from which the latter derives its sole knowledge of the Anarchistic movement, not take the trouble to read beyond the first page. In no other field of social life does there exist to-day a more lamentable confusion, a more naïve superficiality, a more portentous ignorance than in that of Anarchism.
    [Show full text]
  • G.V. Plekhanov Anarchism and Socialism (1895)
    G.V. Plekhanov Anarchism and Socialism (1895) 1 Anarchism and Socialism G.V. Plekhanov Halaman 2 Anarchism and Socialism . Publisher: New Times Socialist Publishing Co., Minneapolis 1895 Translated: Eleanor Marx Aveling Transcribed: Sally Ryan for marxists.org in 2000 Anarchism and Socialism G.V. Plekhanov Halaman 3 Table of Content Preface to the First English Edition by Eleanor Marx Aveling Chapter I. The Point of View of the Utopian Socialists Chapter II. The Point of View of Scientific Socialism Chapter III. The Historical Development of the Anarchist Doctrine Chapter IV. Proudhon Chapter V. Bakounine Chapter VI. Bakounine – (Concluded) Chapter VII. The Smaller Fry Chapter VIII. The So-called Anarchist Tactics Their Morality Chapter IX. Conclusion Anarchism and Socialism G.V. Plekhanov Halaman 4 Preface to the First English Edition The work of my friend George Plechanoff, Anarchism and Socialism, was written originally in French. It was then translated into German by Mrs. Bernstein, and issued in pamphlet form by the German Social-Democratic Publishing Office Vorwaerts . It was next translated by myself into English, and so much of the translation as exigencies of space would permit, published in the Weekly Times and Echo . As to the book itself. There are those who think that the precious time of so remarkable a writer, and profound a thinker as George Plechanoff is simply wasted in pricking Anarchist wind-bags. But, unfortunately, there are many of the younger, or of the more ignorant sort, who are inclined to take words for deeds, high-sounding phrases for acts, mere sound and fury for revolutionary activity, and who are too young or too ignorant to know that such sound and fury signify nothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Anarchism As Constitutionalism Roderick T
    Chapter 9 Market Anarchism as Constitutionalism Roderick T. Long A legal system is any institution or set of institutions in a given society that provides dispute resolution in a systematic and reasonably predictable way. It does so through the exercise of three functions: the judicial, the legislative, and the executive. The judicial function, the adjudication of disputes, is the core of any legal system; the other two are ancillary to this. The legislative function is to determine the rules that will govern the process of adjudication (this function may be merged with the judicial function, as when case law arises through precedents, or it may be exercised separately), while the executive function is to secure submission (through a variety of means, which may or may not include violence) to the adjudicative process and compliance with its verdicts. A government or state (for present purposes I shall use these terms interchangeably) is any organisation that claims, and in large part achieves, a forcibly maintained monopoly, within a given geographical territory, of these legal functions, and in particular of the use of force in the executive function. Now the market anarchist objection to government is simply a logical extension of the standard libertarian objection to coercive monopolies in general.1 First, from a moral point of view, among people regarded as equals2 it cannot be legitimate for some to claim a certain line of work as their own privileged preserve from which others are to be forcibly excluded; we no longer believe in the divine right of kings, and on no other basis could such inequality of rights be justified.
    [Show full text]