Certified Naturally Grown Label

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Certified Naturally Grown Label Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 5-2021 Consumer Preferences for Value Added Products: A Case Study for South Carolina English Lane Ratliff Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Ratliff, English Lane, "Consumer Preferences for Value Added Products: A Case Study for South Carolina" (2021). All Dissertations. 2770. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2770 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR VALUE ADDED PRODUCTS: A CASE STUDY FOR SOUTH CAROLINA A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Plant and Environmental Sciences by English Lane Ratliff May 2021 Accepted by: Michael Vassalos, Committee Chair Marzieh Motallebi, Committee Co-Chair David Willis Juan Carlos Melgar i ABSTRACT This study utilized an online survey administered to South Carolina (SC) consumers in conjunction with a discrete choice modeling approach to examine: i) the knowledge and degree of familiarity with both the USDA Certified Organic and the Certified Naturally Grown labels, ii) the impact of several factors including demographic characteristics, purchasing behaviors, and frequency of organic consumption on consumer’s preferences and Willingness to Pay (WTP) for organic products in South Carolina. This study also includes a Meta-Analysis of WTP for organic products. The first chapter analyzes familiarity of two different labels; USDA Certified Organic and the Certified Naturally Grown. This is achieved by utilizing a Bivariate Ordered Probit model in combination with a Tukey Kramer test. The results indicate that demographic characteristics, and lifestyle preferences have a statistically significant effect on consumer’s familiarity of the USDA Certified Organic and the Certified Naturally Grown labels. However, divergences remain. For example, findings indicate that older consumers are less likely to be familiar with the USDA Certified Organic label as well as the Certified Naturally Grown label but those who spend more time cooking are more likely to be familiar with the USDA Certified Organic label. Similarly, respondents who live in the Lowcountry region of SC are less likely to be familiar with the USDA Certified Organic Label. Respondents who have graduate degrees or higher are less likely to be familiar with the Certified Naturally Grown Label but those respondents who shop for produce at health food stores or farmers markets are more likely to be familiar with the Certified Naturally Grown label. ii The second chapter investigates the impact of different attributes of tomatoes on consumer WTP. This is attained using a choice experiment coupled with the analysis tool of the mixed logit model. The findings indicate consumers have a significant and positive WTP for tomatoes purchased at a grocery store and at farmers markets compared to purchasing tomatoes online. Respondents also have a significant and positive WTP for tomatoes grown in South Carolina vs. Canada. The price premium for organic tomatoes grown in South Carolina is $0.25 compared to the WTP for organic tomatoes grown in the U.S. is only $0.15. These findings have important marketing implications as competition in the organic produce industry increases. It can assist the industry to better target their marketing endeavors and better understand the factors influencing consumer preferences. The third chapter is a meta-analysis which looks at different international WTP studies focusing on different products from 2005 to 2020 and compares the different WTP estimates to derive a common WTP estimate. The results indicate that the WTP estimate that was derived is $3.75/lb. to $3.80/lb. across the different products and countries. Keywords: Organic, Produce, Labeling, USDA Certified Organic, Certified Naturally Grown, Bivariate Ordered Probit, Random Parameter Logit, Meta-Analysis iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my sincerest thanks to those who have supported me as I have strived to fulfil my dreams of completing my Ph.D. at Clemson University. Without their unwavering support, helpful guidance, and personal wisdom, this dissertation would not be complete. First and foremost, I would like to thank my graduate advisors and committee chairs, Dr. Michael Vassalos and Dr. Marzieh Motallebi, for supporting and believing in me at every step of the way through my Ph.D. and through this dissertation. If it were not for them, I would not have the knowledge and drive to continue my focus on consumer demand, especially in the organic market or the passion to do research on South Carolina consumers. I would also like to thank Dr. David Willis and Dr. Juan Carlos Melgar, my committee members, for their continual help and guidance. As the other members of my thesis committee, they offered me continual patient support throughout this process. Lastly, I want to say thanks my parents and my family for all their support, patience, and unconditional love. Without their encouraging words and wisdom through this time, I could not have accomplished any of this. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PAGE .................................................................................................................... i ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER I. FACTORS INFLUENCING CONSUMERS FAMILIARITY WITH USDA CERTIFIED ORGANIC AND CERTIFIED NATURALLY GROWN LABELS: A CASE STUDY FOR SOUTH CAROLINA ..................................................... 4 Methods.................................................................................................... 8 Results and Discussion .......................................................................... 14 II. COMPARING CONSUMERS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR ORGANIC, LOCAL, FAIR TRADE, LOW CARBON FOOTPRINT TOMATOES ACROSS THREE DIFFERENT MARKETING OUTLETS ........................................... 20 Methods.................................................................................................. 24 Results and Discussion .......................................................................... 29 III. WTP FOR ORGANIC: A META-ANALYSIS ............................................ 35 Methods.................................................................................................. 38 Results and Discussion .......................................................................... 41 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................ 45 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 65 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Table 1. Barriers to Purchasing Organic 48 2 Table 2. WTP Per County 48 1.1 Table 1.1. Summary Statistics 49 1.2 Table 1.2. USDA Certified Organic Descriptive 50 Statistics 1.3 Table 3. Certified Naturally Grown Descriptive 51 Statistics 1.4 Table 4. Bivariate Ordered Probit Model 52 2.1 Table 2.1 Summary Statistics 53 2.2 Table 2.2 Attribute Options for Choice Experiment 54 2.3 Table 2.3 Random Parameter Logit Results 55 2.4 Table 2.4 Willingness to Pay Results 55 3.1 Table 3.1 Journal Articles 56 3.1.1 Table 3.1.1 Journal Articles Narrowed Down 61 3.2 Table 3.2 Summary Statistics 63 3.3 Table 3.3 Weighted Least Squares Results 63 3.4 Table 3.4 Meta Regression Analysis Results 64 3.5 Table 3.5 Correlation Matrix Results 64 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.1 Figure 1.1 Map of South Carolina Regions 10 1.2 Figure 1.2 Familiarity with USDA Organic Label 18 1.3 Figure 1.3 Familiarity of Certified Naturally Grown Label 18 2.1 Figure 2.1. Growing Method 33 2.2 Figure 2.2. Example of Choice Experiment 34 vii INTRODUCTION This dissertation consists of three chapters that examine the economic value of value-added attributes for agricultural products. This includes labeling for both USDA Certified Organic and Certified Naturally Grown products, as well as, different marketing outlets (online, farmer’s market, and grocery stores) and attributes such as organic, local, low carbon footprint, and fair-trade certified for tomatoes. The familiarity of labels, is examined in the first chapter, because studies showed that consumers have preferences for certain labels such as USDA Certified Organic but may not actually know what the label is telling them (Sangkumchaliang & Huang, 2012; Samant & Seo, 2016). There is limited background on organic farming in South Carolina (SC) because it is one of the states with the lowest adoption of organic practices. For example, Greene, 2003 found that South Carolina is one of the states where adoption
Recommended publications
  • Factsheet; Organic Farming and Value Chain (Farm-To Fork) in Iran High Value Organic Products the Future for Organic Agriculture in Iran Looks Very Positive
    Factsheet; Organic Farming and Value chain (Farm-to Fork) in Iran High value organic products The future for organic agriculture in Iran looks very positive. Currently there are 43,000 ha of certified organic agricultural land. A high growth rate experienced over the last few years suggests a fast and considerable development in this sector. Due to different climatic conditions across the country, Iran could produce a variety of crops and become a regional hub and global resource to produce high-value organic produce, such as for pistachio, pomegranate, saffron, date, fig and medicinal plants. Cultural studies have shown that Iranians have been always interested in consuming traditional products grown in villages across the country. Development of organic agriculture land in Iran from 2000 to 2019 (ha) 2000 2003 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 57 200 15 913 11745 8853 7256 43332 42633 12155 11601 14573 18870 11915 11915 11915 Source: FIBL survey Organic crops production in Iran (2016-2019) Organic area [ha] Organic area fully converted Organic area under conversion [ha] [ha] Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2016 2017 2018 2019 2016 2017 2018 2019 Almonds 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Apples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Avocados 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Dates 1042 3495 3495 3495 975 3364 3364 3364 67 131 131 131 Grapes, no details 567 540 540 540 567 540 540 540 Grapes, raisins 1287 1472 1472 1472 1287 1472 1472 1472 Kiwis 47 16 16 16 47 16 16 16 Oilseeds, no details 650 650 650 650 650 650 Olives, oil 209 244 244 244 120 155 155 155
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Social Economic Factors Affecting the Adoption
    A STUDY OF THE SOCIAL ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING THE ADOPTION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIC AGRICULTURE BY SMALL SCALE FARMERS IN THE CHONGWE AREA. A Research Report presented to the Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Education of the University of Zambia By Yimale Jalasi-Kumwenda In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Agricultural Sciences. © Yimale Jalasi-Kumwenda, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank God Almighty for making it possible for me to come this far and complete my studies because it was only through Him that 1 have achieved all that I have achieved. 1 wish to express my heartfelt appreciation to Mr Mwikisa Likulunga my supervisor for his tireless counsel and suggestions rendered in producing this report. I would also like to sincerely thank Dr. Chishala, from the Department of Land Management for guiding my initial efforts, Mr. E. Kuntashula and Dr. G. Tembo, my econometrics lecturers for their contributions towards my report. I also wish to thank all the members of staff of the department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Studies for their efforts in my academic endeavours. I would also like to thank my family members for their tireless assistance and sacrifices and guidance and support throughout my studies. Likewise, I am thankful to Mr Kalala and Mr Nyirenda of Kasisi Agricultural Training Centre (KATC) for facilitating my meetings with the respondents and providing me with the necessary information used in this study. Finally, 1 want to thank all my friends and classmates for the help rendered when 1 needed it and for making my stay on campus fulfilling and worthwhile.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Organic Farming Situation in Iran (Challenges and Solutions)
    ACTA SCIENTIFIC AGRICULTURE (ISSN: 2581-365X) Volume 3 Issue 1 January 2019 Mini Review An Overview of The Organic Farming Situation in Iran (Challenges and Solutions) Nasser Majnoun Hosseini* Professor of Agronomy, Agricultural and Natural Resources Campus, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran *Corresponding Author: Nasser Majnoun Hosseini, Professor of Agronomy, Agricultural and Natural Resources Campus, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. Received: December 17, 2018; Published: December 27, 2018 Abstract Having a long history of conventional agriculture and the prerequisites for organic farming, Iran can become one of the major Asian countries in the production of organic products. However, she has not succeeded in this. In order to investigate the state of organic agriculture in the country, analysis the problems and solutions; the information collect through examination of various scien- have a good potential for the transfer of traditional agriculture to organic farming. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the cultural tific and research articles carried out by universities, organizations and private individuals. There are many reasons why Iran's farms dimensions of organic agriculture, which is the optimal exploitation of resources and the protection of the environment and the pro- duction of healthy food. The main worries for producers are i) the yield decline of products due to the lack of fertilizers and chemical pesticides effective in increasing yield, ii) reduced farmers' income during the early years of organic farming, and iii) the easy access of farmers to chemicals. Consumers' problems include i) lack of familiarity with organic products, ii) uncertainty about the organic nature of products, and iii) lack of product ID.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Organic Products' Trade in Iran
    -1- Situation of Organic Products’ Trade in Iran Organic farming is the production system considering to environment and preserving the balance of nature and biological variety by the management system of ecology as the nature and escaping using the synthetic substance such as chemical fertilizer, agricultural chemicals, and hormones and or transgenic animals and plants that caused the environmental pollution. Iran is an important country having sourceof agricultural raw material’s production in the world. It is because differences of weather atmosphere and landscape of Iran make multi agricultural products too. Moreover Iran is the second country having cultivated land 1.65 square kilometers in Middle East countries. Iran has been the center of agricultural development since 10,000 years ago. The wider land of Iran begets multi agricultural products; agricultural products grown from cold area and desert area. urban areas lakes and other lands agricultural land 2% 14% forests 7% rangelands deserts and 56% degraded lands 21% (Chart 1: Proportions of Iran agricultural lands) 18 million hectares of Iran cultivated area can produce 65 million tons of food for 70 million consumers. Iran produces the 30th food quantity of the world and the 8thmulti food production. In the present there are 3.4 million Iranian agriculturists that they use the original organic plant. However a small agriculture does not use the organic farming method; proportion is 80 %. According to the survey of 40 year ago, Since 1981 to 2001, the quantity of agricultural products has been used agricultural chemicals substance about 28,038 tons per year. The year of 1990 was the most chemical use and later the tendency of chemical use reduced day by day.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Organic Sheep and Goat Production by Nomad Pastoralists in Southern Iran Hamid R
    Ansari-Renani Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice (2016) 6:8 Pastoralism: Research, Policy DOI 10.1186/s13570-016-0056-y and Practice RESEARCH Open Access An investigation of organic sheep and goat production by nomad pastoralists in southern Iran Hamid R. Ansari-Renani Abstract The nomadic pastoralist system in Baft district in Kerman province is well known in Iran for producing cashmere from Raeini goats. However, there is little information regarding the organic sheep and goat production systems. Interviews and field observations were carried out with 30 Siahjel nomad families of Raen origin in proximity of Baft city to characterize the organic production system in terms of feeding, animal health and veterinary treatments, husbandry management practices, transport, slaughtering and housing. Unimproved rangeland was found to be the main source of sheep and goat nutrition belonging to nomads in southern Iran. Nomad livestock were not fed in stables or in restricted areas but moved and grazed freely in extensive open grazing areas. As a nomadic traditional feeding management practice, there were no minerals, vitamins, pro-vitamins or GMOs for animal feed. Nomad sheep and goat breeds were considered to be robust, adapted to the environment and disease-tolerant livestock. In the nomadic system, no animal cruelty practices such as tail ducking, dehorning and tethering were allowed. To keep ruminants in groups to meet their social needs, nomad families stayed and kept animals together to support each other in different livestock activities, including shepherding, feeding, milking and health care. Due to natural breeding in nomadic herds, the male breeding stock was kept and grazed separately from does during the breeding season.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Food & Farming in Iran
    ASIA: COUNTRY REPORT IRAN Organic Food & Farming in Iran PAUL RYE KLEDAL1, HOSSEIN MAHMUODI2, AND ABDOL MAJID MAHDAVI DAMGHANI3 Geography and socio-economy If one should compare the complexity of the geo-physical landscape of Iran with another nation it would be Spain. Both countries have a vast central tableland, arid summers, and are often bitterly cold in winter. Both also have wild mountainous areas that are infertile. However, in Iran the scale is larger (Iran is over three times the size of Spain), the mountains are loftier (more than 4’000 meters), and the extremes of heat and cold are more pronounced. The country itself is an elevated plateau (more than 1’000 meters above sea level) set between two depressions: the Caspian Sea to the North and the Persian Gulf to the South. Picture: A young shepherd with his goats in North Central Iran The central plateau is surrounded by two tall mountain ranges. In the North (following an east-west line) is the Alborz range creating a fertile coastal plain along the Caspian Sea where the major crops are rice, tea, and citrus. In the west, going south all the way to the Persian Gulf, is the Zagros mountain range reaching more than 4’000 meters in height in some places. Transverse valleys along the Zagros mountain range still have remains of what was once vast oak, pistachio, almonds and walnut forests, but are now mainly occupied by grazing herds of sheep and goats. In general, the mountainous areas and the valley floors offer opportunities for growing wheat and barley accounting respectively for 50 and 17 percent of Iran’s agricultural production.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Agriculture As a Tool for City and Landscape Planning in Iran
    Urban Agriculture as a Tool for City and Landscape Planning in Iran with Emphasize On the Role of Persian Garden vom Fachbereich Architektur/Raum- und Umweltplanung/Bauingenieurwesen der Universität Kaiserslautern zur Verleihung des akademischen Grades Doktor-Ingenieur (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl.-Ing. Seyyed Mohammad Reza Khalilnezhad Kaiserslautern, im November 2016 Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 12.12.2016 D386 Betreuung: Herr Prof. Dr. agr. Kai Tobias, Lehr- und Fachgebiet Landschafts- & Freiraumentwicklung Herr Prof. Dr. agr. Ali Tehrani Far, Lehr- und Fachgebiet Landschafts- & Gartenbauwissenschaften Ferdowsi Universität Mashhad, Islamische Republik Iran In the Name of God The Most Merciful, The Most Compassionate Urban Agriculture as a Tool for City and Landscape Planning in Iran with Emphasize On the Role of Persian Garden Seyyed Mohammad Reza Khalilnezhad 2016 Technische Universität Kaiserslautern I Urban Agriculture as a Tool for City and Landscape Planning in Iran with Emphasize On the Role of Persian Garden A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Engineering Seyyed Mohammad Reza Khalilnezhad Department of Landscape and Open Spaces Development Faculty of Urban and Environmental Planning Technical University of Kaiserslautern Kaiserslautern, Germany 2016 II Abstract This Ph.D. project as a landscape research practice focuses on the less widely studied aspects of urban agriculture landscape and its application in recreation and leisure, as well as landscape beautification. I research on the edible landscape planning and design, its criteria, possibilities, and traditional roots for the particular situation of Iranian cities and landscapes. The primary objective is preparing a conceptual and practical framework for Iranian professions to integrate the food landscaping into the new greenery and open spaces developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Anita Zahiri Benjamin Franklin High School New Orleans, Louisiana, United States Iran, Infectious Diseases
    Anita Zahiri Benjamin Franklin High School New Orleans, Louisiana, United States Iran, Infectious Diseases Food Insecurity: The Next Pandemic The country of Iran, previously known as Persia and officially known as the Islamic Republic of Iran, is the second largest country in the Middle East, with a population of around 83,992,949 people (World Bank, 2020). Iran is a primarily hot and arid country with long dry summers and cool but short winters. The whole country is around 1.75 million square kilometers (675,678 square miles), making it slightly smaller than the state of Alaska. Iran is bordered by Afghanistan, Armenia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, Iraq, and Pakistan, as well as the Gulf of Oman, Caspian Sea, and Persian Gulf. It has a very rough terrain, with about 52% of the country having mountains and deserts and much of the country standing above sea level (FAO, 2008). Iran was previously a primarily agrarian society, but due to rapid urbanization and economic development during the 20th century, it has shifted to a mixed and transition economy containing a large public sector. Around 74.9% of Iran’s population lives in urban areas, while 25.1% lives in rural, undeveloped areas (“Iran Demographics,” 2018). Only around 10% of Iran’s land area is arable due to the rough topography, and the agricultural sector consists mostly of small farming units that are dispersed around the country, with more than 80% of these farms being smaller than ten hectares, which is considerably small (The World Bank, 2016; FAO, 2008). Being a net importer of agricultural products such as corn, rice, and soybeans, Iran is highly dependent upon trade to feed its population.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in Iran the Statistical Of
    ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN JIHAD-E-AGRICULTURE MINISTRY Promoting Agricultural Value Chains in the OIC Member Dr. MAHDI KAZEMNEJAD Director General Office for Economic Affairs 6 th Meeting of Agriculture Working Group 8 th October 2015 ANKARA - TURKEY Agricultural jobs are The important economic business in the world and Islamic countries. They basically give gift political, economic and social security to countries. We know agriculture occupies are very important from view point of value added creation therefore it’s necessary to develop value chain management. Agriculture expression in Iran The statistical of agriculture products is following as below table: Item Subdivision Amount 1 Agronomy 73725 Thousand Tons 2 Horticulture 16525 Thousand Tons Livestock and poultry 3 12621 Thousand Tons 5 Fishery 946 Thousand Tons 6 Forestry and pasture 99000000 Hectares Source: statistical book of agriculture( volume 1&2) IRAN’S Agriculture Economic in a glance Economic factors Amount(%) 10 Value Added employee 18 value chain management Value chain management views the flow up , from the consumer to the source. Value chain management also concerns with the flow of production, but it has a different view than supply chain management. The consumer is viewed as source as the source of value within this approach to management. The demand for products create by consumers drives product value . The primary focus for value chain management is the creation of value and not the cost of goods. Fundamental activities of value chain management • human resource • Marketing • Production • Logistic • Agribusiness Value chain From another point focus on below items: Product testing(quality) Innovation Research and Development marketing An Agriculture Value Chain(AVC) AVCs are the sequence of steps from production through delivery of a product to the consumer, which includes feedback between the participants in the chain to create efficiencies and to provide more desirable and better quality products.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran (Islamic Republic Of)
    Country profile – Iran (Islamic Republic of) Version 2008 Recommended citation: FAO. 2008. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Iran (Islamic Republic of). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Desertification in Iran
    hydrology Article Drought and Desertification in Iran Iraj Emadodin *, Thorsten Reinsch and Friedhelm Taube Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Group of Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-431-880-1516 Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published: 7 August 2019 Abstract: Iran has different climatic and geographical zones (mountainous and desert areas), mostly arid and semi-arid, which are suffering from land degradation. Desertification as a land degradation process in Iran is created by natural and anthropogenic driving forces. Meteorological drought is a major natural driving force of desertification and occurs due to the extended periods of low precipitation. Scarcity of water, as well as the excessive use of water resources, mainly for agriculture, creates negative water balances and changes in plant cover, and accelerates desertification. Despite various political measures having been taken in the past, desertification is still a serious environmental problem in many regions in Iran. In this study, drought and aridity indices derived from long-term temperature and precipitation data were used in order to show long-term drought occurrence in different climatic zones in Iran. The results indicated the occurrence of severe and extremely severe meteorological droughts in recent decades in the areas studied. Moreover, the De Martonne Aridity Index (IDM) and precipitation variability index (PVI) showed an ongoing negative trend on the basis of long-term data and the conducted regression analysis. Rapid population growth, soil salinization, and poor water resource management are also considered as the main anthropogenic drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Organic Agriculture in Minnesota 2015
    Status of Organic Agriculture in Minnesota 2015 A Report to the Minnesota Legislature Contact Meg Moynihan, 651-201-6012 625 Robert St. N., St. Paul, MN 55155 www.mda.state.mn.us April, 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................................................3 Introduction. 4 Background. 4 Primary Data Sources ........................................................................5 Organic Farm and Market Trends . 5 Organic Adoption and Production ..............................................................5 Organic Prices .............................................................................8 Market Demand ................................................................................10 Organic Consumer Insights ..................................................................11 Promotional Check-off Effort .................................................................12 Minnesota Organic Farmer Experiences and Perspectives . 13 Current State and Federal Programs Directed Toward Organic Agriculture ...............................18 Minnesota Department of Agriculture ..........................................................18 Organic Activities by Partner Organizations. 19 Recommendations . 23 Previous Recommendations – Progress Toward Goals . 23 Current Recommendations ..................................................................25 References ....................................................................................26 Appendices ....................................................................................28
    [Show full text]