DOCSLIB.ORG

Ibārā (Philosophia Verlag, Munich: 2013) Translation of Ibn Sn, Al-Maqlt, Ed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ibārā (Philosophia Verlag, Munich: 2013) Translation of Ibn Sn, Al-Maqlt, Ed Published Translation of Avicenna (Ibn Sn), Al-‘Ibārā (Philosophia Verlag, Munich: 2013) Translation of Ibn Sn, Al-Maqlt, ed. El-Khodeiri et al., Philosophia Verlag, Munich, 2016 Aristotle’s Theory of Abstraction, Springer Verlag 2014 Aristotle on Predication (xiv + 346 pp.), (Brill: Leiden, 2000) On Reduplication (xviii + 343 pp.), (Brill: Leiden, 1996) Hypertext of Prior Analytics I for the Archelogos Project The Way to Go: Philosophy in Martial Arts Practice [with Daeshik Kim] (Seoul: Na Nam Publishing, 2000) Martial Meditation: Philosophy and the Martial Arts [with Daeshik Kim] (Seoul: Na Nam Publishing, 1989) “Anselm on Perfect Islands,” Franciscan Studies, Vol. 43 (1983) “Aristotle,” Handbook of Mereology, ed. H. Burkhardt, J. Seibt, & G. Imaguire, Philosophia Verlag, Munich, 2017 “Aquinas on Predication,” in Aristotle’s Peri Hermenias in the Latin Middle Ages, ed. H. Brakhuis & C. Kneepkens (Gröningen, 2003) “Aquinas on the Incarnation,” New Scholasticism, Vol. LVI.1 (1982) “Aristotelian Necessities,” History and Philosophy of Logic, Vol. 16 (1995) “Aristotle’s Discovery of First Principles,” in From Puzzles to Principles, ed. May Sim (Lanham, Md., 1999) “Aristotle’s Theory of Parts,” Philosophia Verlag, 2010 “Avicenna and Averroes: Modality and Theology,” in Potentialität und Possibilität, ed. T. Buchheim et al. (Stuttgart, 2001) “Avicenna and Averroes: The Islamic Background,” in Individuation in Scholasticism, ed. J. Gracia. SUNY Press, 1994 “Avicenna and Kant on the Imagination,” Topícos, Vol. 29 (2005) “Avicenna in the Age of Columbus,” in Columbus and the New World, ed. J. Schnaubelt & F.Van Fleteren (New York, 1998) “Avicenna on Being and Existence,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. XXV (1987); trans. into Turkish by Yusuf Dasdemir (2014). “Avicenna’s Conception of the Modalities,” Vivarium XXX.2 (1992) “Avicenna’s Hermeneutics,” Vivarium, Vol. 49, 1-3 (2011),ed.C. Marmo. 9- 25, trans. into Turkish by Mustafa Selman (2014). “Avicenna’s Ontological Pentagon,” The Journal of Neoplatonic Studies, Vol. VII.2 (1999) “Avicenna’s Theory of Supposition,” in Medieval Supposition Theory Revisited, ed. E. P. Bos et al., Vivarium 51.1-4b (2013), 79-115 “Avicenna and Descartes on the Wax Example,” Proceedings of the S.I.E.P.M. Conference, ed. S. Brown, Brepols, 1996 “Avicenna on Relations and the Bradleyan Regress,” in La tradition médiévale des Catégoires, ed. J. Biard & I. Rosier-Catach (Louvain, 2003) “Avicenna on the Categorical Assertive,” Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-assertive Language, ed. S. Maierù & L. Valente, L. Olschki (Rome, 2004) “Avicenna The Commentator,” in Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, ed. Lloyd A. Newton (Leiden, 2008) “Demonstration and Dialectic in Islamic Philosophy,” Routledge Companion to Islamic Philosophy, ed. L. López-Farjeat & R. Taylor “Existence and Modality in Avicenna's Syllogistic”, in The Aftermath of Syllogism Aristotelian Logical Argument from Avicenna to Hegel, ed. Marco Sgarbi, & Matteo Cosci, Bloomsbury Publishing, London 2017 “Existential Import in Anselm’s Ontological Argument,” Franciscan Studies, Vol. 41 (1981) “The Formal Structure of Scotus’ Formal Distinction,” in Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain, ed. I. Angelelli and P. Ilzarbe (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2000) “The Future of Predication Theory,” in Topics in Predication Theory (series: Studies in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, ed. Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Peter Lang GmbH “How the Fallacy of Accident Got Its name (and Lost It)”, Studies in the history of logic: A volume in honour of Angel d’Ors, ed. P. Pérez- Ilzarbe and M. Cerezo, Brill, 2017 “Ibn Sina on the Individuation of Perceptible Substance,” Proceedings of the PMR Conference, Vol. 14 (1989) “Insights of Avicenna,” ed. A. Storck, in Aristotelis analytica posteriora: estudos acerca da recepção medieval dos segundos analíticos. Porto Algre, Linus Editores, 2009, 111-48ISBN 978-85-60063-10-9, 111-48 “Islamic Logic?,” in The Unity of Science in the Islamic Tradition, eds. S. Rahman, T. Street, and H. Tahiri (Berlin, 2008) “The Ki to Strength in the Martial Arts,” in Philosophical Reflections on Physical Strength, ed. M. Holowchak &: Terry Todd (Lewiston: Mellen Press, 2010), 91-114 “Logic in Imperial Rome,” Apeiron 33.1 (2000) “Medieval Protocol Languages,” in Formal Approaches and Natural Language in Medieval Logic, ed. A. de Libera, L. Cesali et al., Tournhout, Brepols, 2017 “Mistakes of Reason,” Phronesis 54 (2009) 101-135 “The Ordinary Language Approach in Traditional Logic,” in Argumentationstheorie, ed. K. Jacobi, Brill, 1993 “The Paper World of Bernard Suits,” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, Vol. 35.2 (2008) “Philoponus on the Fallacy of Accident,” Ancient Philosophy 7 (1987) “Reduplicative Propositions in the Theology of John Duns Scotus,” in Vestigia, Imagines, Verba, ed. C. Marmo & Umberto Eco (Turnhout, 1997) “Reduplication,” Handbook of Mereology, ed. H. Burkhardt et al. “Qua,” Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology (Philosophia Verlag, 1991) “Qualification,” Anales de la Academia Nacional de Ciencas de Buenos Aires “Sailing Through the Sea Battle,” Ancient Philosophy Vol. 12 (1992) “Scotus on the Consistency of the Incarnation and the Trinity,” Vivarium Vol. 36.1 (1998) “Syllogism,” Handbook of Mereology, ed. H. Burkhardt et al. “Syllogisms with Reduplication in Aristotle,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Vol. 23.4 (1982) “The Reality of the Statement and the Now in Aristotle,” in Time and Tense, ed. Stamatios Gerogiorgakis, Munich, 2016 “The Role of Qualification,” Journal of Philosophical Research, Vol. 27 (2002) “The Triplex Status Naturae and its Justification,” Studies in the History of Logic, ed. I. Angelelli & M. Cerrezo (Berlin, 1996) “Thinking Clearly about Violence,” Philosophical Studies, Vol. 117 (2004); repr. Violence, ed. V. Bufacchi (Palgrave MacMillan, London, 2009), 365-74 “The Moral Status of the Modern Martial Arts,” Proceedings of the Eight Martial Arts Conference, Korean Alliance of Martial Arts (2007) “Virtues and Vices of the Martial Arts,” Journal of the Korean Martial Arts Alliance [with Kim Changwoo] "Two Aristotelian Theories of Existential Import", Aporía, Vol. 2 (2011), pp. 4-24 “The Way to Virtue in Sport,” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport Vol. 38 (2009), 217-237; repr. Philosophy of Sport: Critical Readings, Crucial Issues, Second Edition, ed. M. Holowchak, Prentice-Hall, 2011 “What is Being Qua Being?” Idealization XI, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, ed, F. Coniglione, R. Poli, & R. Rollinger, Vol. 82 (2004) “Who is the Worthiest of Them All?,” in Sophisms, ed. Stephen Read (Dordrecht, 1993) Review Article of The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, ed. P. Adamson & R. Taylor, Ars Disputandi, Vol. 8 (2008) Review Article of Kenneth Seeskin, Maimonides on the Origin of the World, Ars Disputandi Vol. 6 (2006) Review Article of Robert Wisnovsky, Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context, Ars Disputandi, Vol. 5 (2005). Review Article of John Martin, Themes in Neoplatonic and Aristotelian Logic, Ars Disputandi, Vol. 5 (2005). Review of Alvin Plantinga, The Metaphysics of Modality, Ars Disputandi, Vol. 5 (2005) Review article of Paul Thom, Medieval Modal Systems: Problems and Concepts, Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Ars Disputandi, Vol. 4 (2004) Review article of Aspects of Aristotle’s Logic of Modalities, Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 11 (1991) Review article of The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy, ed. Frank & Leaman, Ars Disputandi, Vol. 4 (2004) Review article of Gerhardt Heyer, Generische Kennzeichnungen, in Noûs (1996) Review article of Richard Cross, The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, Ars Disputandi Review article of Theodor Köhler, Grundlagen des philosophisch- anthropologischen Diskurses im dreizehnten Jahrhundert, Vivarium, Vol. 40.2 (2002) Review of Gassendi’s Institutio Logica, Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. XX.4 (1982) Review of Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals, by Jan Aertsen (Brill, 1995) Vivarium Vol. 37.2 (1999) Review of Al-Farabi’s Commentary on De Interpretatione, trans. Zimmermann, Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. XXI.2 (1983) Review of Ammonius, On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 1-8, trans. D. Blank, The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 50 (1996), pp. 384-5 Review of Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics, trans. Charles Butterworth, Canadian Philosophical Reviews Review of Maimonides and St. Thomas on the Limits of Reason, by Idit Dobbs-Weinstein, Vivarium Vol. 37.2 (1999) Review of John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics, ed. L. Honnefelder et al. (Leiden, 1996), Vivarium Vol. 37.2 (1999) Review of Richard Patterson, Aristotle’s Modal Logic, Canadian Philosophical Reviews, Vol. XVI.4 (1996) Review of Paul Spade, Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals in The Review of Metaphysics (1996) Review of J. Lameer, The Syllogistic of Alfarabi, Vivarium Vol. 33.2 (1995) Review of Jean-Baptiste Rauzy, La doctrine Leibnizienne de la vérité, Review of Metaphysics Review of History of Islamic Philosophy, ed. S. Nasr & O. Leaman, Speculum Review of Dag Hasse, Avicenna’s De Anima in the West, Vivarium. Review of Jean-Paul Reding, Comparative Essays on Early Greek and Chinese Rational Thinking Dao, Vol. III.4 (2004) Review Article of Amos Bertolacci, The Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics, Ars Disputandi Review of Lambert of Auxerre, Logica or Summa Lamberti, Thomas S. Maloney (tr.), U of Notre Dame Press, 2015, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (http://ndpr.nd.edu)? Review
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Existence and Reference in Medieval Logic
    GYULA KLIMA EXISTENCE AND REFERENCE IN MEDIEVAL LOGIC 1. Introduction: Existential Assumptions in Modern vs. Medieval Logic “The expression ‘free logic’ is an abbreviation for the phrase ‘free of existence assumptions with respect to its terms, general and singular’.”1 Classical quantification theory is not a free logic in this sense, as its standard formulations commonly assume that every singular term in every model is assigned a referent, an element of the universe of discourse. Indeed, since singular terms include not only singular constants, but also variables2, standard quantification theory may be regarded as involving even the assumption of the existence of the values of its variables, in accordance with Quine’s famous dictum: “to be is to be the value of a variable”.3 But according to some modern interpretations of Aristotelian syllogistic, Aristotle’s theory would involve an even stronger existential assumption, not shared by quantification theory, namely, the assumption of the non-emptiness of common terms.4 Indeed, the need for such an assumption seems to be supported not only by a number of syllogistic forms, which without this assumption appear to be invalid, but also by the doctrine of Aristotle’s De Interpretatione concerning the logical relationships among categorical propositions, commonly summarized in the Square of Opposition. For example, Aristotle’s theory states that universal affirmative propositions imply particular affirmative propositions. But if we formalize such propositions in quantification theory, we get formulae between which the corresponding implication does not hold. So, evidently, there is some discrepancy between the ways Aristotle and quantification theory interpret these categoricals.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae of Alvin Plantinga
    CURRICULUM VITAE OF ALVIN PLANTINGA A. Education Calvin College A.B. 1954 University of Michigan M.A. 1955 Yale University Ph.D. 1958 B. Academic Honors and Awards Fellowships Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, 1968-69 Guggenheim Fellow, June 1 - December 31, 1971, April 4 - August 31, 1972 Fellow, American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 1975 - Fellow, Calvin Center for Christian Scholarship, 1979-1980 Visiting Fellow, Balliol College, Oxford 1975-76 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowships, 1975-76, 1987, 1995-6 Fellowship, American Council of Learned Societies, 1980-81 Fellow, Frisian Academy, 1999 Gifford Lecturer, 1987, 2005 Honorary Degrees Glasgow University, l982 Calvin College (Distinguished Alumni Award), 1986 North Park College, 1994 Free University of Amsterdam, 1995 Brigham Young University, 1996 University of the West in Timisoara (Timisoara, Romania), 1998 Valparaiso University, 1999 2 Offices Vice-President, American Philosophical Association, Central Division, 1980-81 President, American Philosophical Association, Central Division, 1981-82 President, Society of Christian Philosophers, l983-86 Summer Institutes and Seminars Staff Member, Council for Philosophical Studies Summer Institute in Metaphysics, 1968 Staff member and director, Council for Philosophical Studies Summer Institute in Philosophy of Religion, 1973 Director, National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Seminar, 1974, 1975, 1978 Staff member and co-director (with William P. Alston) NEH Summer Institute in Philosophy of Religion (Bellingham, Washington) 1986 Instructor, Pew Younger Scholars Seminar, 1995, 1999 Co-director summer seminar on nature in belief, Calvin College, July, 2004 Other E. Harris Harbison Award for Distinguished Teaching (Danforth Foundation), 1968 Member, Council for Philosophical Studies, 1968-74 William Evans Visiting Fellow University of Otago (New Zealand) 1991 Mentor, Collegium, Fairfield University 1993 The James A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of the Free Will Defense, a Comprehensive Look at Alvin Plantinga’S Solution to the Problem of Evil
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2013 A Critique of the Free Will Defense, A Comprehensive Look at Alvin Plantinga’s Solution To the Problem of Evil. Justin Ykema University of New Hampshire - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/honors Part of the Medieval Studies Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Ykema, Justin, "A Critique of the Free Will Defense, A Comprehensive Look at Alvin Plantinga’s Solution To the Problem of Evil." (2013). Honors Theses and Capstones. 119. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/119 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of New Hampshire Department of Philosophy 2012-2013 A Critique of the Free Will Defense A Comprehensive Look at Alvin Plantinga’s Solution To the Problem of Evil. by Justin Ykema Primary Reader: Jennifer Armstrong Additional Readers: Willem deVries, Paul McNamara & Ruth Sample Graties tibi ago, domine. Haec credam a deo pio, a deo justo, a deo scito? Cruciatus in crucem. Tuus in terra servus, nuntius fui; officium perfeci. Cruciatus in crucem. Eas in crucem. 1 Section I: Introduction Historically, the problem of evil exemplifies an apparent paradox. The paradox is, if God exists, and he is all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful, how does evil exist in the world when God created everything the world contains? Many theologians have put forth answers to solve this problem, and one of the proposed solutions put forth is the celebrated Free Will Defense, which claims to definitively solve the problem of evil.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Logic
    c Peter King & Stewart Shapiro, The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (OUP 1995), 496–500. THE HISTORY OF LOGIC Aristotle was the first thinker to devise a logical system. He drew upon the emphasis on universal definition found in Socrates, the use of reductio ad absurdum in Zeno of Elea, claims about propositional structure and nega- tion in Parmenides and Plato, and the body of argumentative techniques found in legal reasoning and geometrical proof. Yet the theory presented in Aristotle’s five treatises known as the Organon—the Categories, the De interpretatione, the Prior Analytics, the Posterior Analytics, and the Sophistical Refutations—goes far beyond any of these. Aristotle holds that a proposition is a complex involving two terms, a subject and a predicate, each of which is represented grammatically with a noun. The logical form of a proposition is determined by its quantity (uni- versal or particular) and by its quality (affirmative or negative). Aristotle investigates the relation between two propositions containing the same terms in his theories of opposition and conversion. The former describes relations of contradictoriness and contrariety, the latter equipollences and entailments. The analysis of logical form, opposition, and conversion are combined in syllogistic, Aristotle’s greatest invention in logic. A syllogism consists of three propositions. The first two, the premisses, share exactly one term, and they logically entail the third proposition, the conclusion, which contains the two non-shared terms of the premisses. The term common to the two premisses may occur as subject in one and predicate in the other (called the ‘first figure’), predicate in both (‘second figure’), or subject in both (‘third figure’).
    [Show full text]
  • Denoting Concepts, Reference, and the Logic of Names, Classes As As Many, Groups, and Plurals
    Denoting Concepts, Reference, and the Logic of Names, Classes as as Many, Groups, and Plurals Nino B. Cocchiarella Abstract Bertrand Russell introduced several novel ideas in his 1903 Principles of Mathematics that he later gave up and never went back to in his sub- sequent work. Two of these are the related notions of denoting concepts and classes as many. In this paper we reconstruct each of these notions in the framework of conceptual realism and connect them through a logic of names that encompasses both proper and common names, and among the latter complex as well as simple common names. Names, proper or com- mon, and simple or complex, occur as parts of quanti…er phrases, which in conceptual realism stand for referential concepts, i.e., cognitive capaci- ties that inform our speech and mental acts with a referential nature and account for the intentionality, or directedness, of those acts. In Russell’s theory, quanti…er phrases express denoting concepts (which do not include proper names). In conceptual realism, names, as well as predicates, can be nominalized and allowed to occur as "singular terms", i.e., as arguments of predicates. Occurring as a singular term, a name denotes, if it denotes at all, a class as many, where, as in Russell’s theory, a class as many of one object is identical with that one object, and a class as many of more than one object is a plurality, i.e., a plural object that we call a group. Also, as in Russell’stheory, there is no empty class as many.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy May 20, 2013
    Outline of Philosophy May 20, 2013 Contents SOCI>Philosophy .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 SOCI>Philosophy>Aesthetics ....................................................................................................................................... 3 SOCI>Philosophy>Aesthetics>Beauty .................................................................................................................... 4 SOCI>Philosophy>Aesthetics>Theory .................................................................................................................... 4 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology ................................................................................................................................. 5 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Possibility ......................................................................................................... 6 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>World ................................................................................................................ 6 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Object Properties .............................................................................................. 6 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>System Properties ............................................................................................. 6 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Representation .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook-Of-Semiotics.Pdf
    Page i Handbook of Semiotics Page ii Advances in Semiotics THOMAS A. SEBEOK, GENERAL EDITOR Page iii Handbook of Semiotics Winfried Nöth Indiana University Press Bloomington and Indianapolis Page iv First Paperback Edition 1995 This English­language edition is the enlarged and completely revised version of a work by Winfried Nöth originally published as Handbuch der Semiotik in 1985 by J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart. ©1990 by Winfried Nöth All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses' Resolution on Permissions constitutes the only exception to this prohibition. Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging­in­Publication Data Nöth, Winfried. [Handbuch der Semiotik. English] Handbook of semiotics / Winfried Nöth. p. cm.—(Advances in semiotics) Enlarged translation of: Handbuch der Semiotik. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. ISBN 0­253­34120­5 1. Semiotics—handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Communication —Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Title. II. Series. P99.N6513 1990 302.2—dc20 89­45199 ISBN 0­253­20959­5 (pbk.) CIP 4 5 6 00 99 98 Page v CONTENTS Preface ix Introduction 3 I. History and Classics of Modern Semiotics History of Semiotics 11 Peirce 39 Morris 48 Saussure 56 Hjelmslev 64 Jakobson 74 II. Sign and Meaning Sign 79 Meaning, Sense, and Reference 92 Semantics and Semiotics 103 Typology of Signs: Sign, Signal, Index 107 Symbol 115 Icon and Iconicity 121 Metaphor 128 Information 134 Page vi III.
    [Show full text]
  • In Ockham's Theory of Supposition
    The Role of ‘Denotatur’ in Ockham’s Theory of Supposition Catarina Dutilh Novaes University of Groningen Abstract In the scholarship on medieval logic and semantics of the last decades, Ockham’s the- ory of supposition is probably the most extensively studied version of such theories; yet, it seems that we still do not fully understand all its intricacies. In this paper, I focus on a phrase that occurs countless times throughout Ockham’s writings, but in particu- lar in the sections dedicated to supposition in the Summa logicae: the phrase ‘denotatur’. I claim that an adequate understanding of the role of the concept of denotatur within Ockham’s supposition theory shall yield a deeper understanding of the theory as a whole. Here, I first examine a few uses of the term ‘denotatur’ and its variants by other authors. I then turn to Ockham: first I briefly mention some uses of the term in contexts other than his theory of supposition. Following that, I focus on his supposition theory, in particular on how ‘denotatur’ allows him to deal with two crucial puzzles, namely the supposition of empty terms and the supposition of terms in false affirmative proposi- tions. The treatment of these two puzzles suggests that Ockham’s theory of supposition must be understood as a theory chiefly intended for the generation of the meanings of propositions. Keywords Ockham, supposition theory, denotatur, empty terms, affirmative false propositions 1. Introduction Ockham’s theory of supposition is probably still the most extensively studied of such medieval theories. Interest in Ockham’s theory in particular can be traced back to the pioneering works of E.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Opportunities from the Perspectives of Contemporary Philosophy and Religion
    Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series IV, Western European Philosophical Studies, Volume 12 Re-Learning to be Human in Global Times: Challenges and Opportunities from the Perspectives of Contemporary Philosophy and Religion Edited by Brigitte Buchhammer The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Copyright © 2018 by The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Gibbons Hall B-20 620 Michigan Avenue, NE Washington, D.C. 20064 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Names: Buchhammer, Brigitte, editor. Title: Re-learning to be human in global times : challenges and opportunities from the perspectives of contemporary philosophy and religion / edited by Brigitte Buchhammer. Description: first [edition]. | Washington DC : Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2018. | Series: Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series IV, Western European philosophical studies ; Volume 12 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018010133 | ISBN 9781565183339 (pbk. : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Philosophical anthropology. | Humanism. | Persons. | Religion and philosophy. | Globalization. Classification: LCC BD450 .R346 2018 | DDC 128--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018010133 Stephen O’Connor, BA (Hons.), Ph.D.: Proofreading Michael Stork: Copy editing, formatting and indexing Ε-mail: [email protected] http://independent.academia.edu/MichaelStork Table of Contents Foreword v Herta Nagl-Docekal Preface vii Kurt Appel Introduction 1 Brigitte Buchhammer 1. Biblical Traces of the Guest 5 Kurt Appel 2. The Search for Lost Intimacy: Georges Bataille on Religion as 13 Immanent Human Experience Thomas M. Schmidt 3. Transformations of Doctrine as Cases of Mutual Learning between 25 Religions and Cultures: Schleiermacher’s Proposal for Translating Christology in Modernity Maureen Junker-Kenny 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Existentialism?
    States of Affairs, Maria Reicher, ed., (Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag 2009): 167-208. Defending Existentialism? Marian David University of Notre Dame This paper is concerned with a popular view about the nature of propositions, commonly known as the Russellian view of propositions. Alvin Plantinga has dubbed it, or more precisely, a crucial consequence of it, Existentialism, and in his paper “On Existentialism” (1983) he has presented a forceful argument intended as a reductio of this view. In what follows, I describe the main relevant ingredients of the Russellian view of propositions and states of affairs. I present a relatively simple response Russellians might want to make to Plantinga’s anti-existentialist argument. I then explore one aspect of this response—one that leads to some rather curious consequences for the Russellian view of propositions and states of affairs. 1. The Russellian View of Propositions and States of Affairs For present purposes, I take for granted that there are propositions. They are most perspicuously referred to by unadorned that-clauses, such as ‘that ants are insects’, or by what grammarians call appositive noun-phrases containing a that-clause, e.g. ‘the proposition that ants are insects’. Propositions are, as one says a bit metaphorically, the shareable contents of mental states and speech acts, such as believing, disbelieving, assuming, asserting, and denying. If I believe that ants are insects, then there is something I believe, namely (the proposition) that ants are insects. If you too believe that ants are insects, then there is something we both believe, namely (the proposition) that ants are insects.
    [Show full text]
  • A Kantian Theodicy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Asbury Theological Seminary Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 9 4-1-1984 A Kantian Theodicy David McKenzie Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation McKenzie, David (1984) "A Kantian Theodicy," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 1 : Iss. 2 , Article 9. Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol1/iss2/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. A KANTIAN THEODICY David McKenzie. Since the publication of J. L. Mackie's "Evil and Omnipotence" in 1955 and especially since the publication of Alvin Plantinga's God, Freedom, and Evil in 1974, much discussion of the problem of evil has been focused on the Free Will Defense as a possible solution. Furthermore, the discussion has been oriented to what is sometimes called, 'the logical problem', namely, whether the statement that the omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good God of theism exists is consis­ tent with the statementthat evil exists, and not so much to the 'evidential problem' , namely, whether, even if Plantinga and others are right and these two are ulti­ mately consistent, the extent of the evil in our world does not undermine the ra­ tional justifiability of belief in God.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Renaissance and Modern Logic from 1400 to 1850
    History of Renaissance and Modern Logic from 1400 to 1850 https://www.historyoflogic.com/logic-modern.htm History of Logic from Aristotle to Gödel by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] History of Renaissance and Modern Logic from 1400 to 1850 INTRODUCTION: LOGIC IN CONTINENTAL EUROPE "At the end of the fourteenth century there were roughly three categories of work available to those studying logic. The first category is that of commentaries on Aristotle's 'Organon'. The most comprehensive of these focussed either on the books of the Logica Vetus, which included Porphyry's Isagoge along with the Categories and De Interpretatione; or on the books of the Logica Nova, the remaining works of the 'Organon' which had become known to the West only during the twelfth century. In addition there were, of course, numerous commentaries on individual books of the 'Organon'. The second category is that of works on non-Aristotelian topics. These include the so-called Parva logicalia, or treatises on supposition, relative terms, ampliation, appellation, restriction and distribution. To these could be added tracts on exponibles and on syncategorematic terms. Peter of Spain is now the best-known author of parva logicalia, but such authors as Thomas Maulvelt and Marsilius of Inghen were almost as influential in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Another group of works belonging to the second category consists of the so-called 'tracts of the moderns', namely treatises on consequences, obligations and insolubles. A third group includes treatises on sophisms, on the composite and divided senses, and on proofs of terms, especially the well-known Speculum puerorum by Richard Billingham.
    [Show full text]