Environmental Effects of Slaking of Surface Mine Spoils Eastern & Central United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Effects of Slaking of Surface Mine Spoils Eastern & Central United States , -?>r:~-'-"'; y!tfLPftttC£ IA .. 76~?:J REPORT ~R&U\J\11\, LIBRARY COpy ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF SLAKING OF SURFACE MINE SPOILS EASTERN & CENTRAL UNITED STATES prepared for: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF MINES by: D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, Inc. 10 Duff Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15235 Final Report Contract No. J0285024 SEPTEMBER 1980 2 3. Recipi~nt's Acc~ssion No. REPORT DOCUMENTATIONll. R~pon No. 1 . PAGE 4. Titl~ and Subtitl~ 5. R~pon Dat~ September, 1980 Environmental Effects of Slaking of Surface Mine Spoils - Eastern and Central United States 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performin~ Organization Rept. D. E. Andrews, J. L. Withiam, E. F. Perry, and H. L. Crouse No. 78- 75 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/ll'ork Unit No. D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, Inc. 10 Duff Road 11. Contract/Grant No. Pittsburgh, PA 15235 J0285024 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Addr~ss 13. Type of Report & Period United States Department of the Interior Covered Final Report Bureau of Mines 10/78 - 9/80 Denver Federal Center 14. Denver, CO 80225 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstracts The objective of this study was to investigate the environmental effects of slaking of sur face mine spoils. To accomplish this, both field and laboratory programs were undertaken,. supplemented by a thorough literature search. The field program consist- ed of drilling the highwall as well as test pitting 1n recent, two-, five- , and ten- year-old spoil piles at four active mining sites 1U the eastern bituminous coal fields. Pertinent observations were made and samples collected for laboratory analyses which consisted of several standard geotechnical, agronomic, and geochemic al tests. Durao'i- lity tests utilized inc luded jar slake, cyc lic wet-dry, rate of slake, and slake durability tests. Correlation between field and laboratory portions was made and re- sults presented. The report is conc luded with a discussion of the slaking process and associated environmental impacts, proposal of a preliminary classification system for use in premine planning, and presentation of management techniques to optimize the slaking process. 17. Document Analysis •. Descriptors Environmental Effects, Slaking, Eastern and Central United States, Slaking Mechanisms, Classification, Management Techniques, Annotated Bibliography b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms Surface Coal Mine Spoils, Field Investigations, Laboratory Testing c. COSA TI Field/Group 8D, 8G, 81 18. Availability Stat~m~nt 19. Security Class (This 21. No. of Pages Report ) 'UNCLASSIFIED 247 Release Unlimited 20. Security Class {This 22. Pric~ P.~ NCLASSIFIED FORM NTIS.3S '~EV. 10-131 ENDORSED BY ANSI AND UNESCO. THIS FORM MAYBE REP RODUCED USCOMM·OC 12es·P l. FOREWORD This report was prepared by D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, Inc., under USBM Contract No. J0285024. The contract was initiated under the Mining Environmental Research Program and completed under the Minerals Environmental Technology Program. It was administered under the technical direction of Bureau of Mines with Mr. Michael J. Bailey acting as Technical Project Officer. Mr. William R. Case was the Con­ tract Administrator for the Bureau of Mines. This report is a summary of the work recently completed as a part of this contract during the period October 1978 to November 1979. This report was submitted by the authors on September 30, 1980. We wish to acknowledge the participation of the many D'Appolonia employ­ ees who aided with the various phases and tasks of the study. Special recognition is given to Mr. Kevin Roberts who provided the majority of literature review during the initial stages of the project. We extend our grateful appreciation to Mr. William Strohm, Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi for the loan of the slake durability testing apparatus and to the mining companies and mine per­ sonnel for their cooperation during the investigations. Their assis­ tance and friendly attitudes were key factors to a successful completion of this project. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF TABLES 6 LIST OF FIGURES 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 10 2.0 SLAKING MECHANISMS 12 2.1 CONFINING STRESS RELIEF 13 2.2 HYDRATION FORCE INCREASE 17 2.3 DOUBLE LAYER REPULSION FORCE INCREASE 19 2.4 PORE AIR COMPRESSION 20 2.5 NEGATIVE PORE PRESSURE INCREASE 22 2.6 CRYSTAL GROWTH FORCE INCREASE 23 2.7 BOND OR PARTICLE DETERIORATION 25 2.8 SURFACE ENERGY REDUCTION 26 3.0 GEOLOGY OF COAL-BEARING UNITS OF APPALACHIAN AND ILLINOIS BASINS 28 3.1 GEOLOGY OF THE APPALACHIAN AND ILLINOIS BASINS 29 3.1.1 Appalachian Basin 31 3.1.2 Illinois Basin 32 4.0 MINING AND RECLAMATION TECHNIQUES 45 4.1 EXCAVATION AND PLACEMENT TECHNIQUES 45 4.2 RECLAMATION TECHNIQUES 47 5.0 FIELD PROGRAM 49 5.1 PRELIMINARY SITE SELECTION 49 5.2 SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND FINAL SELECTION 50 5.3 HIGHWALL EXPLORATION 50 5.4 MINE SPOIL EXPLORATION 52 5.5 INTERVIEWS WITH MINE AND REGULATORY PERSONNEL 56 6.0 SITE CONDITIONS 59 6.1 SITEA 59 6. I. I Geologic Condit ions 60 6.1.2 Mining Technology and Spoil Handling 60 6.1.3 Reclamation Techniques 63 6.2 SITE B 64 6.2.1 Geologic Conditions 64 6.2.2 Mining Technology and Spoil Handling 64 6.2.3 Reclamation Techniques 67 6.3 SITE C 68 6.3.1 Geologic Conditions 68 6.3.2 Mining Technology and Spoil Handling 69 6.3.3 Reclamation Techniques 69 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE 6.4 SITE D 72 6.4. I Geologic Conditions 72 6.4.2 Mining Technology and Spoil Handling 73 6.4.3 Reclamation Techniques 76 7.0 PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED SLAKING-RELATED CLASSIFICATIONS AND LABORATORY TECHNIQUES 78 7. I CLASSIFICATION 78 7. I.I Taxonomic Classification Systems 78 7.1.2 Engineering (Technical) Classification Systems 79 7.2 MATERIAL TESTING 88 7.2.1 Identification Tests 90 7.2.2 Durability Tests 93 7.2.3 Strength Tests 97 8.0 LABORATORY PROGRAM 100 8.1 SAMPLE SELECTION AND PREPARATION 102 8.2 DURABILITY TESTS 103 8.3 IDENTIFICATION TESTS 103 8.4 ANCILLARY TESTS 105 9.0 RESULTS OF FIELD AND LABORATORY PROGRAMS 109 9.1 FIELD PROGRAM RESULTS 109 9.1.1 Modes of Slaking 109 9.1.2 Impact of Material Properties on Slaking 110 9.1.3 Impact of Mining Techniques on Slaking 110 9.1.4 Physical Characteristics of Spoil Piles as Related to Slaking 113 9.1.5 Environmental Effects of Slaking 130 9.2 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM 132 9.2.1 Durability Tests 133 9.2.1.1 Jar Slake Test 135 9.2.1.2 Cyclic Wet/Dry Test 136 9.2.1.3 Cyclic Rate of Slaking Tests 140 9.2.1.4 Slake Durability Test 143 9.2.1.5 Summary of Durability Test Results 146 9.2.2 Identification Tests 149 9.2.2.1 Moisture Content 150 9.2.2.2 Grain Size (Disaggregated) and Atterberg Limits 154 9.2.2.3 Unit Weight 154 9.2.2.4 I: I (Soil) pH 154 9.2.2.5 Exchange/Adsorption Capacity 157 9.2.2.6 Petrographic (Thin Section) Examination 161 9.2.2.7 X-Ray Diffraction 162 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE 9.2.3 Ancillary Tests 162 9.2.3.1 Point Load Tests 162 9.2.3.2 Slake Fluid pH 166 9.2.3.3 Specific Conductance 166 9.2.3.4 Postdurability Testing 168 9.3 COMBINED FIELD AND LABORATORY RESULTS 168 9.3.1 Durability and Slaking Modes 169 10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 178 10.1 SUMMARY OF THE SLAKING PHENOMENON 178 10.2 ENVIROt~NTAL EFFECTS OF SLAKING 181 10.2.1 Hydrological Impacts 182 10.2.2 Slope Instability and Settlement 182 10.2.3 Erosion and Sedimentation 184 10.2.4 Vegetation Relationships 186 10.3 PROPOSED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 188 10.4 MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY 193 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 199 APPENDIX A - TEST PROCEDURES 233 5 LIST OF TABLES TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE 2. 1 Summary of Slaking Mechanisms: Material Relationships 14 2.2 Summary of Slaking Mechanisms: Environmental and Rate Relat ionships 16 3. 1 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Alabama-Cahaba Field 33 3.2 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Alabama-Coosa Field 34 3.3 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Alabama-Plateau Field 35 3.4 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Alabama-Warrior Field 36 3.5 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Eastern Kentucky 37 3.6 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Ohio 38 3.7 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Western Pennsylvania 39 3.8 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in West Virginia 40 3.9 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Illinois 42 3.10 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Indiana 43 3.11 Summary of Coal-Bearing Units in Western Kentucky 44 5. 1 Outline of Descriptors Used for Mine Spoil Characterization 54 6.1 Site A: Summary of Lithologic Propert ies 61 6.2 Site B: Summary of Lithologic Propert ies 65 6.3 Site C: Summary of Lithologic Propert ies 70 6.4 Site D: Summary of Lithologic Properties 74 7. 1 Summary of Laboratory Tests Associated with Slaking 89 8. 1 Schedule for Identification Tests 106 9.1 Relationship of Slaking Modes to Rock Properties III 9.2 Summary of Durability Test Results 134 9.3 Summary of Slake Durability Test Results 144 9.4 Summary of Degradation Indices (DI) for Comparable Test Conditions 147 9.5 Summary of Unit Weight and 1:1 pH Determinations 156 9.6 Summary of Exchange/Adsorption Capacity Test Results 160 9.7 Summary of X-Ray Diffraction Analyses 163 9.8 Summary of Point Load Test Results 164 6 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NO.
Recommended publications
  • Maryland Bureau of Mines for Theperiod January 1 to December 31, 1932, in Compliance with Therequirements of the Maryland Mining Law
    . TENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE MARYLANDBUREAU OF MINES OFTHE STATE OF MARYLAND Underthe Supervision of the State Board of Labor and Statistics DR. J. KNOX INSLEY, Commissioner CALENDAR YEAR 1932 TO HON. ALBERT C. RITCHIE GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND JOHN J. RUTLEDGE Chief Mine Engineer ;press of King Bros.. 1. 208 N. Cavert Stre Ba1timor, -Md LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To His Excellency, HON. ALBERT C. RITcmE, Governor of Maryland. SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith the TenthAnnual Report of the Maryland Bureau of Mines for theperiod January 1 to December 31, 1932, in compliance with therequirements of the Maryland Mining Law. Very respectfully, / JOHNJ. RUTLEDGE, Chief Mine Engineer. -I REPORT OF THE MARYLAND BUREAU OF MINES To His Excellemey,, HON. ALBERT C. RITCrnE, Governor of Maryland. SIR: The report herewith submitted is for the calendar year 1932, and is the fifty-sixth annual report upon conditions of the Coal and. Clay mines within the State. The reports from the various mining operators throughout the State show the tonnage to be as follows: CLAY AND COAL PRODUCTION Calendar Year 1932 (Net Tons, cwt) Pick 996,448.18 Machine 454,917.06 Total 1,451,366.04 COAL PRODUCTION, ALLEGANY COUNTY During the calendar year 1932, Allegany County employed 1,685 miners, 106 drivers, 353 inside laborers and 170 outside employes, making a total of 2,314 men. The production of coal for Allegany County during the calendar year 1932 was 927,-. 831.03 net tons (cwt). This shows a production of 550.6 net tons for each miner employed during this period.
    [Show full text]
  • A Passage Through Time & the Mountains
    The GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE is the longest multi-purpose rail-trail in the East, A Passage Through Time with t 00 continuous miles of trail open from near McKeesport to near Meyersdale, plus and the several smaller segments open in the Pittsburgh area. When finished, the Passage Mountains will offer a total of t 50 miles of non­ motorized, nearly level trail system between Cumberland, MD and the forks of the Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA. with a 52-mile spur to the Pittsburgh International Airport. At. Cumberland, it joins the C&..O Canal Towpath to expand the off-road trail linkage to Washington, D.C. Designated a National Recreation Trail, the Great Allegheny Passage enables hikers, bicyclists, cross­ country skiers and people with disabilities to discover the region's singular beauty in river gorges, mountain vistas and sweeping cityscapes. The Great Allegheny Passage is the registered mark of the Allegheny Trail Alliance, a coalition of seven trail organizations in Sovthwestem Pennsylvania and Western Maryland. www.atatrall.org 888-ATA-BIKE COVER: On May 2 t , t 975, the Chessie System ran this special train over the soon­ to-be-abandoned Western Maryland corridor from Connellsville to Hancock, MD to show the line to government and conservation officials and the press. This was the last passenger train to cross Salisbury Viaduct. The Viaduct was decked for trail use in 1999. The color photo was taken in May, 2002. Photos by Bill Metzger 50300 The Story of the GREAT ALLEGHENY 9 780964 601499 PASSAGE 2 HE GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE is no mere tootpath through the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mining Activities
    IV-l IV GEOLOGY AND MINING ACTIVITIES 1. GEOLOGY All of the Youghiogheny Basin lies within the Applachian Plateaus Province. Some 30%, west of Chestnut Ridge, is in the Pittsburgh Plateaus Section of the province and the rest is in the Allegheny Mountain Section. A series of folds creates ridges and valleys which generally trend SW to NE. Folds east of Chestnut Ridge are closer and more uniform. West of Chestnut Ridge is more mountainous and includes Mt. Davis formed by the Negro Mountain Anticline, and which is the highest point in Pennsylvania, elev 3,213 ft. Prominent structural features are shown in Figure 1. Those of particular importance to mine drainage pollution are, from west to east: Important Important Structure Strata Group Coal Pigeon Creek Syncline Monongahela Pittsburgh Irwin Syncline Monongahela Pittsburgh Greensburg Syncline Monongahela Pittsburgh Latrobe Syncline Monongahela Pittsburgh Uniontown Syncline Monongahela Pittsburgh Ligonier Syncline Allegheny L. Kittanning Centerville Dome Allegheny L. Freeport Negro Mt. Anticline Allegheny L. Kittanning & Brookville Berlin Syncline Monongahela Pittsburgh & Allegheny L. Kittanning & U. Kittanning These geologic structures are discussed starting on page IV-4. A generalized tabulation of the stratigraphy is included in Table IV-A. The Washington Group is not included since this has been eroded away except on a few hilltops in the deepest syncline basins. IV-2 Table IV-A, Geologic Strata Age Group Thickness Members Thickness Pennsylvanian Monongahela 260-400’ Waynesburg Coal 3 -9’ Waynesburg Limestone 0-20’ Uniontown Sandstone 10-20’ Uniontown Coal 0 -2’ Uniontown Limestone 25-45’ Benwood Limestone 30-60’ Sewickley Sandstone 0-60’ SEWICKLEY COAL* 0-10’ Fishpot Limestone 5-30’ REDSTONE COAL* 1 -5’ Redstone Limestone 5-20’ Pittsburgh Sandstone 12-70’ PITTSBURGH COAL** 6 -14’ Pennsylvanian Conemaugh 500-750’ Little Pittsburgh Coal 0-l Connellsville Sandstone 5 -50’ Clarksburg Limestone 0 -7’ Morgantown Sandstone 5 -120’ Birmingham Shale 50 -60’ L.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopic Composition of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon in Underground Mine Discharges of the Northern Appalachian Basin
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2014 Isotopic composition of dissolved inorganic carbon in underground mine discharges of the northern appalachian basin Rachelle Thorne West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Thorne, Rachelle, "Isotopic composition of dissolved inorganic carbon in underground mine discharges of the northern appalachian basin" (2014). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 235. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/235 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Isotopic Composition of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon in Underground Mine Discharges of the Northern Appalachian Basin Rachelle Thorne Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Investigations in Late Paleozoic Geology of Ohio1 2
    Copyright © 1979 Ohio Acad. Sci. SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATIONS IN LATE PALEOZOIC GEOLOGY OF OHIO1 2 MYRON T. STURGEON, Department of Geology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701 Abstract. This report summarizes the development of our understanding of the stratigraphy, paleontology and economic geology of the Carboniferous and Permian Systems of Ohio, and can conveniently be divided into four time units: prior to 1869, 1869-1900, 1900-1949 and 1949 to the present. The first period was a time during which animals and Indians sought essential mineral substances and early explorers reported on geologic features and resources. Notes and reports were published on newly established mineral industries during and after settlement. This period also included publication of two annual reports de- scribing the accomplishments of the short-lived First Ohio Geological Survey in the mid-1830's and publication of notes by individuals on general geology, fossils and mineral resources of the State between 1840 and the Civil War. Systematic investi- gation and reporting on Ohio's geology really began with the establishment of the Second Ohio Geological Survey in 1869 and has continued under three subsequent surveys. The distinguished staff of the Second Survey prepared and published reports on stratigraphy, fossils and mineral resources and the first geologic map including accompanying structure and stratigraphic sections. The Third Survey increased the emphasis on economic geology in its publications, and the Fourth and present Surveys have continued this attention in their appropriate reports and maps. In 1949 the Survey became a division in the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. OHIO J. SCI. 79(3): 99, 1979 This summary pertains to the develop- and most sources of other cited references ment of our understanding of the geology are available in the bibliography, where of the Carboniferous and Permian Sys- a total of more than 600 references are tems in Ohio, with emphasis on stratig- available.
    [Show full text]
  • Section V Effects of Mining on Current Watershed
    SECTION V EFFECTS OF MINING ON CURRENT WATERSHED CONDITIONS SECTION V EFFECTS OF MINING ON CURRENT WATERSHED CONDITIONS OCCURRENCE OF COAL IN THE LOYALHANNA WATERSHED The two principle coal seams mined in the Loyalhanna watershed are the Pittsburgh and Upper Freeport seams. The Pittsburgh coal seam lies at the base of the Monongahela Formation and the Upper Freeport coal seam at the top of the Allegheny Formation. Between these seams lies the Cone-, maugh formation which is 650 to 700 feet thick. Prior to discussing the causes of, and possible solutions to, existing acid mine drainage problems in the watershed, it is helpful to review the geologic history of the region. This history is illustrated in the geologic columnar section of the region as shown on Plate V-1. The exposed rocks of the Loyalhanna watershed are classed as sedimentary rocks. They are the remains of materials deposited during the Mississippian and Pennsylvania epochs of the Carboniferous period. During this period of deposition, western Pennsylvania was alternately open water, lake and lush swamp. The coal deposits are the fossil remains of the lush swamp environment, while the related sandstones, limestones and shales are remains of former marine and lake environments. Beneath the coal bearing formations, the major sedimentary deposits underlying the region begin with the Pocono Sandstone Formation deposited during the Mississippian epoch. This formation is overlain by the coals, V-1 shales, limestone and sandstones of the Mauch Chunk, Pottsville and Allegheny formations. The marker bed at the top of the Allegheny formation is the Upper Freeport coal seam which is four to six feet in thickness.
    [Show full text]
  • B56 Norling 1958.Pdf
    ~ 1· i-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·---~~·-·1 . ~ STATE OF1 OHIO ('I" .1,··1··· - I. C. WU.LIAM 0 NEll.L, Governor . ___ ~ . ! DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES I HERBERT B,, EAGON, Director DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RALPH J. BERNHAGEN, Chief 1:•;"\ r . ' - ... ,···er' THE 0ttll.J Li; . _ : : _ ·. ;•~::'.. .;;Jdh:f THE OHIO DfViS!ON GEQLJG!:;''.L SURVEY 33 ~~li~:i~ ~EMOVED FROM i ODNR DIV. OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LIBRARY II i• GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES I OF MORGAN COUNTY, OHIO I By Donald L. Norling COLUMBUS 1958 -·-·-··-.-.-. -. - ·-.-.- ·-.-.-. -. -. -· -.- ·-.-·-·-·-·-__I Blank Page CONTENTS Page Abstract . viii CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION Location. 1 Acknowledgments . 1 Purpose and scope 4 Previous work . 4 CHAPTER 2 - PHYSIOGRAPHY General . G Drainage. 8 Relief . 8 CHAPTER 3 - STRATIGRAPHY Pennsylvanian system . 11 General .... 11 Allegheny series. 14 General .. 14 Middle Kittanning clay member. 15 Middle Kittanning (No. 6) coal member 15 Washingtonville shale member . 17 Upper Kittanning coal member . 18 Lower Freeport sandstone and shale member 18 Lower Freeport limestone member. 18 Lower Freeport clay member . 19 Lower Freeport (No. 6-A) coal member. 20 Dorr Run shale member . 20 Upper Freeport sandstone and shale member 20 Bolivar clay member . 21 Bolivar coal member . 21 Upper Freeport limestone member . 22 Upper Freeport clay member . 22 Upper Freeport (No. 7) coal member . 23 Conemaugh series . 24 General . ...... 24 Lower Mahoning sandstone and shale member 26 Mahoning limestone member. 27 Thornton clay member . 28 Mah~ning coal member . ..· :. ·. 29 Upper Mahoning. sandstone and· shale member.. 29 Mason clay member . 30 iii iv CONTENTS Page Mason coal member . • . 31 Brush Creek shale and sandstone member. 31 Brush Creek coal member.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolomite and Siliciclastic Dikes and Sills in Marginal-Marine Cretaceous Coals of Central Utah
    Dolomite and Siliciclastic Dikes and Sills in Marginal-Marine Cretaceous Coals of Central Utah U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2087-A AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re­ leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may no longer be available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices listed below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S3869
    March 14, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S3869 Thereupon, the Senate, at 12:37 p.m., Fayette Counties—all of which were tation methods improved, the thick recessed until 2:15 p.m.; whereupon, the big coal producers—and my uncle, who Pittsburgh coal seam, prominent in Senate reassembled when called to raised me, worked in the mines of Mer- northern West Virginia, assured the order by the Presiding Officer (Mr. cer, McDowell and Raleigh counties. area of a steady growth in coal produc- COATS). Therefore, I shall reflect in my re- tion as transportation methods im- f marks today, on the conditions under proved. I quote from Mr. Cohen’s work: which the coal miners worked when I Mines were operating in the Fairmont re- EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL AP- was a boy and which led to the union- PROPRIATIONS AND RESCIS- gion by 1850 for local consumption. When the ization of the miners. I shall refer to Baltimore and Ohio Railroad reached Fair- SIONS ACT the social conditions under which the mont in 1853, markets opened up as far East The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under coal miners labored to raise their fami- as Baltimore. The coal fields around Wheel- the previous order, the Senate will now lies, and I shall also speak of the trials ing, and the Northern Panhandle, were also resume consideration of H.R. 889, which and turmoils that attended the coming mined prior to the Civil War; the coal was the clerk will report. of the union to the southern counties needed for a fledgling iron industry in that city that had begun before the War of 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh-Geology-GSA
    Engineering Geology, History and Geography of the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Area RICHARD E. GRAY DiGioia Gray & Associates, 570 Beatty Road, Monroeville, PA 15146 BRIAN H. GREENE Gannett Fleming, Inc., Foster Plaza 8, Suite 400, 730 Holiday Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 RYAN W. FANDRAY* GAI Consultants, Inc., 385 East Waterfront Drive, Homestead, PA 15120 ROBERT J. TURKA GAI Consultants, Inc., 4200 Triangle Lane, Export, PA 15632 Key Terms: Pittsburgh, Geology, Engineering Geology, ing infrastructure are deteriorating. Today, Pittsburgh Rivers has transcended the legacy name, “Steel City” and has revitalized itself with nationally-recognized universities ABSTRACT and medical centers and a resurgence in natural gas ex- ploration. However, many environmental legacy issues The City of Pittsburgh, PA is located west of the still burden the area. Appalachian Mountains in the Appalachian Plateaus Province. The relatively flat surface of the plateau is INTRODUCTION dissected by drainage from the three principal rivers of the region, the Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio. The Geographic Setting formation of Pittsburghs three rivers and drainages has a long history dating back to before the Pleistocene Although Pittsburgh has a long history as a major Epoch, linked closely to the advance and retreat of con- industrial center, it occupies a relatively small area, 2 tinental glaciation. 56 square miles (145 km ), and it has a population Western Pennsylvania is associated with the western- of approximately 305,000 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010). most formation of the Appalachian Mountain chain with Pittsburgh is located within Allegheny County, which deformation in the form of a series of nearly flat-lying, is one of the 67 counties in Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Predictive of Roof Instability in Addition to the Exisiting
    FACTORS PREDICTIVE OF ROOF INSTABILITY IN ADDITION TO THE EXISITING CMRR CRITERIA AT TWO CASE STUDY COAL MINES by Meriel Young A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geological Engineering). Golden, Colorado Date ________________ Signed: ___________________________ Meriel Young Signed: ______________________ Dr. Gabriel Walton Thesis Advisor Signed: ______________________ Dr. Elizabeth Holley Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date__________________ Signed: ______________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Professor and Department Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Roof falls remain one of the greatest hazards facing underground coal miners (Barczak et al., 2000; Razani et al., 2013; Oraee et al., 2016). In 2017 there were 91 lost-time injuries from roof falls (in US underground coal mines). A further 48 roof falls were reported in US underground coal mines with no lost days (MSHA, 2018). These numbers have certainly decreased over the last century (MSHA, 2018), but the goal of zero injuries still remains. Assessing the likelihood of roof falls is therefore highly important and will have a direct effect on the prevention of accidents caused by them. One method developed to help assess roof instability in underground coal mines is the Coal Mine Roof Rating (CMRR). The CMRR is a field-based empirical method which is straightforward to use and gives a quantitative interpretation of coal mine roof geology. The CMRR classification system was developed by Molinda and Mark (1994) to quantify the geological description of mine roof into a single value which could be used in engineering design.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Optimization for Mine Void Stabilization Projects: a Deep Mine Case Study
    2007 World of Coal Ash (WOCA), May 7-10, 2007, Covington, Kentucky, USA Home Cost Optimization for Mine Void Stabilization Projects: A Deep Mine Case Study Joseph F. Giacinto1, Paul Petzrick2, Leonard G. Rafalko1 1Environmental Resources Management, Inc., 200 Harry S Truman Parkway, Suite 400, Annapolis, MD 21401; 2Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Power Plant Research Program, Building B-3, Tawes State Office Building, Annapolis, MD 21401 KEYWORDS: cost optimization, mine void stabilization, coal combustion by products, CCPs, mine void grouting, subsidence, grout, material properties, FBC, pozzolan ABSTRACT With increasingly sprawling communities encroaching upon underground abandoned mine lands, economic costs due to the risk of building over mine voids include lost business opportunities for real estate development and associated jobs, and stunted economic development. For a candidate site in western Maryland, an adaptable, economical and environmentally friendly means of restoring underground mines to productive use is presented with detailed optimized cost components. Underlain by mine voids, a business incubator park is considered for the prototypical site in the study area. By using Coal Combustion by-Product (CCP) grout in lieu of conventional Portland cement, a cost savings of several million dollars for a grout volume of 150,000 cubic yards is demonstrated. Proportionally lower project costs are associated with the use of progressively higher CCP grout volumes. The specified CCP mix consists of 100 percent Fluidized Bed Combustion (FBC) ash in a 70:30 fly to bed ash ratio which results in an environmentally benign material with excellent structural and engineering properties that are similar to conventional cement. Based on the study, the primary categories of cost for mine void stabilization are: • Engineering Services; • Site Preparation and Restoration; • CCP Materials, Supply and Transportation; and • On Site Grouting Operations.
    [Show full text]