Microcephaly-Associated Protein WDR62 Regulates Neurogenesis Through JNK1 in the Developing Neocortex
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Cell Reports Article Microcephaly-Associated Protein WDR62 Regulates Neurogenesis through JNK1 in the Developing Neocortex Dan Xu,1 Feng Zhang,1 Yaqing Wang,1 Yiming Sun,1 and Zhiheng Xu1,2,* 1State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, West Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China 2Center of Parkinson’s Disease, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing 100101, China *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.016 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. SUMMARY somes or mitotic spindle poles (Bilgu¨ var et al., 2010; Guernsey et al., 2010; Hussain et al., 2012; Manzini and Walsh, 2011; Nich- Mutations of WD40-repeat protein 62 (WDR62) have olas et al., 2010; Wollnik, 2010; Yu et al., 2010). Mutations been identified recently to cause human MCPH (auto- in ASPM (MCPH5) and WD40-repeat protein 62 (WDR62; somal-recessive primary microcephaly), a neurode- MCPH2) genes account for more than half of MCPH worldwide velopmental disorder characterized by decreased (Mahmood et al., 2011; Thornton and Woods, 2009). brain size. However, the underlying mechanism is During the initial stages of cortical development, self-renewing unclear. Here, we investigate the function of WDR62 symmetric cell division of progenitors generates sufficient numbers of cells to serve as a pool for ongoing neurogenesis in brain development and the pathological role of WDR62 (Dehay and Kennedy, 2007; Franco and Mu¨ ller, 2013; Huttner mutations. We find that WDR62 knockdown and Kosodo, 2005; Knoblich, 2008; Wang et al., 2011). The pro- leads to premature differentiation of neural pro- liferation and differentiation of NPCs mainly take place in the ven- genitor cells (NPCs). The defect can be rescued by tricular and subventricular zones (VZ and SVZ, respectively). wild-type human WDR62, but not by the five MCPH- Disturbance of the symmetric cell divisions can lead to reduction associated WDR62 mutants. We demonstrate that of the neural progenitor pool, a subsequent decrease in prolifer- WDR62 acts upstream of JNK signaling in the control ation, and decline of neuron production levels. The end result is a of neurogenesis. Depletion of JNK1 and WDR62 in- smaller than usual brain or microcephaly (Dehay and Kennedy, curs very similar defects including abnormal spindle 2007; Huttner and Kosodo, 2005; Manzini and Walsh, 2011; Noc- formation and mitotic division of NPCs as well as pre- tor et al., 2004; Thornton and Woods, 2009; Wollnik, 2010). The mature NPC differentiation during cortical develop- newborn neurons transiently become multipolar with multiple processes within the SVZ and lower intermediate zone (IZ) and ment. Thus, our findings indicate that WDR62 is then change to a bipolar morphology and migrate along radial required for proper neurogenesis via JNK1 and pro- fibers to the cortical plate (CP) where they further mature (Marı´n vide an insight into the molecular mechanisms under- and Rubenstein, 2003; Noctor et al., 2001; Tsai et al., 2005). lying MCPH pathogenesis. Recent studies have identified WDR62 as a causative gene of autosomal recessive microcephaly (Bilgu¨ var et al., 2010; Nicho- INTRODUCTION las et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2010). Similar to our findings for POSH (plenty of SH3 domains) (Kukekov et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2003, Development of the mammalian cortex requires precise timing 2005), WDR62 was originally reported as a scaffold protein for of proliferation/self-renewal of neural progenitor cells (NPCs), the JNK pathway (Cohen-Katsenelson et al., 2011; Wasserman differentiation, neuronal migration, and maturation. Abnormality et al., 2010). WDR62 has 13 WD40 domain repeats in its N-termi- in any of these processes may lead to brain developmental dis- nal half and MKK7/JNK binding domains and six potential JNK orders, such as primary autosomal-recessive microcephaly phosphorylation sites in its C-terminal half. Although WDR62 (MCPH) and lissencephaly (Kaindl et al., 2010; Kang et al., has been proposed to play an important role in spindle formation 2011; Manzini and Walsh, 2011; Marı´n and Rubenstein, 2003; and the proliferation of neuronal progenitor cells (Bilgu¨ var et al., Thornton and Woods, 2009; Tsai et al., 2005). MCPH is a neural 2010; Nicholas et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2010), the exact role of developmental disorder in which patients display significantly WDR62 during cortical development and the underlying mecha- reduced brain size and mental retardation (Mahmood et al., nism by which WDR62 regulates neurogenesis and thereby brain 2011). Interestingly, eight genes (MCPH1–MCPH8) underlying size are unknown. primary microcephaly identified so far are predicted to be asso- In this study, we explore the role of WDR62 in cortical develop- ciated with the function of mitotic apparatus, such as centro- ment. We find that knockdown of WDR62 expression in the rat 104 Cell Reports 6, 104–116, January 16, 2014 ª2014 The Authors A B CD Figure 1. WDR62 Knockdown Results in Altered Cell Distribution and Loss of Radial Glial Fibers (A–C) Coronal sections from rat brains electroporated at E16.5 and inspected at E20.5. Slices were stained with Hoechst for nuclei. WDR62 shRNAs result in reduction of the fraction of cells in the CP and VZ/SVZ but an increase in the IZ. (A and C) Images of cortices electroporated with bicistronic constructs encoding both EGFP and shRNAs, including scrambled (Ctrl) or WDR62-directed small hairpin siRNAs (shW1, shW2, or shW3). Scale bars, 100 mm. (B) Quantification of cell distribution. Data are mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA. Ctrl, n = 9; shW1, shW2, and shW3, n = 6. n, brain slice number from different brains. (D) Coronal sections from rat brains electroporated at E16.5 and inspected at E18.5. Slices were stained with GFP antibody in order to detect weak GFP signals. Yellow-boxed areas denote zoomed areas shown in the right two columns. Scale bar, 50 mm. See also Figures S1 and S2. embryonic cortex disturbs the redistribution of newborn neu- line) (Figures S1D–S1G). We used these shRNAs to deplete rons. Wild-type (WT) WDR62, but not the mutants found WDR62 expression in NPCs via in utero electroporation (IUE) in patients with MCPH, can rescue the defects incurred by at embryonic day 16.5 (E16.5) in rat. There were striking differ- WDR62 knockdown. We further demonstrate that WDR62 plays ences in the distribution of transfected cells between WDR62 an essential role in the proliferation and differentiation of NPCs shRNA- and control shRNA-transfected brains inspected through the regulation of JNK1 activity. 4 days (E20.5) or 8 days (postnatal day 2 [P2]) later (Figures 1A and S2A). In the knockdown brains (E20.5), very few cells RESULTS reached the CP, and significantly more cells resided in the IZ compared with controls (Figures 1A and 1B), which apparently WDR62 Knockdown Leads to Defects in NPC correlated well with the knockdown efficacy of shRNAs (Fig- Development that Can Be Rescued by WT WDR62 but ure S1). At P2, most of the WDR62 knockdown cells were Not Mutants Found in Patients with MCPH located in the white matter (WM) of the cerebrum instead (Fig- In order to examine the role of WDR62 in brain development, we ure S2A). More importantly, WDR62 depletion resulted in signif- first assessed the expression of WDR62. In agreement with a icant loss of cells remaining in the proliferative regions of the VZ/ previous report by Nicholas et al. (2010), WDR62 is expressed SVZ 4 days after IUE (Figures 1A–1C). We also did the IUE at E14 in the VZ and SVZ of developing rat forebrain and is located in and inspected the brains at E17.5 and observed similar defects the spindle poles of HEK293 cells in a cell-cycle-dependent as those electroporated at E16.5 and inspected at E20.5 manner (Figures S1A–S1C). We then screened bicistronic con- (Figure S2B). structs encoding both EGFP (or dsRed) and shRNA for WDR62 The decrease of cell number in the VZ/SVZ may be partially knockdown capacity. We found three different shRNAs (shW1, due to cell death because WDR62 knockdown led to a modest shW2, and shW3) capable of knocking down levels of WDR62 increase of cells positive for the activated form of caspase-3 efficiently in different cell types, including cortical neurons and (Figures S2C and S2D). Because neurons are derived from radial mouse neuroblastoma N2a cells (a neural progenitor-like cell glial cells that function as NPCs during brain development to Cell Reports 6, 104–116, January 16, 2014 ª2014 The Authors 105 A Figure 2. WDR62 Knockdown-Incurred Defects Can Be Rescued by WT Human WDR62, but Not Mutants Found in Patients with MCPH (A) Diagram of human WDR62 and sites of different mutants used in (B). (B) WDR62 knockdown-incurred defects can be rescued by human WDR62. Plasmids expressing B either WT or different mutants of human WDR62 were coelectroporated with plasmids expressing control or WDR62 shRNA and analyzed as in Fig- ure 1A. Scale bar, 100 mm. (C) Confirmation of coexpression of WT WDR62 (stained with WDR62 antibody and shown in red) with WDR62 shRNA (green). (D) Quantification of cell distribution in (B). Data are mean ± SEM. ns, p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA. Vector + Ctrl and Vector + shW2 n = 5; all others, n = 3. n, brain slice number from different brains. See also Figure S3. C of the defects incurred by WDR62 knockdown (Figures 2B–2D). In addition, hWDR62 could rescue WDR62 knock- down-incurred defects in a dosage- dependent manner (Figure S3).