Sharyl Attkisson
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Future of Investigative Journalism: Global, Networked and Collaborative
The Future of Investigative Journalism: Global, Networked and Collaborative Ellen Hume and Susan Abbott March 2017 Note: This report is extracted from our recent evaluation of the Global Investigative Journalism Network (GIJN) for the Adessium Foundation. Ellen Hume would like to thank especially David Kaplan, Susan Abbott, Anya Schiffrin, Ethan Zuckerman, James Hamilton, Tom Rosenstiel, Bruce Shapiro, Marina Guevara Walker and Brant Houston for their insights. 2 1. Overview: The Investigative Media Landscape The internet and DIY communication tools have weakened the commercial mainstream media, and authoritarian political actors in many once-promising democratic regions are compromising public media independence. Fewer journalists were murdered in 2016 than the previous year, but the number of attacks on journalists around the world is “unprecedented,” according to the Index on Censorship.1 Even the United States, once considered the gold standard for press freedom, has a president who maligns the mainstream news media as “enemies of the people.” An unexpectedly bright spot in this media landscape is the growth of local and cross-border investigative journalism, including the emergence of scores of local nonprofit investigative journalism organizations, often populated by veterans seeking honest work after their old organizations have imploded or been captured by political partisans. These journalism “special forces,” who struggle to maintain their independence, are working in dangerous environments, with few stable resources to support them. Despite the dangers and uncertainties, it is an exciting time to be an investigative journalist, thanks to new collaborations and digital tools. These nonprofits are inventing a potent form of massive, cross-border investigative reporting, supported by philanthropy. -
How to Fund Investigative Journalism Insights from the Field and Its Key Donors Imprint
EDITION DW AKADEMIE | 2019 How to fund investigative journalism Insights from the field and its key donors Imprint PUBLISHER RESPONSIBLE PUBLISHED Deutsche Welle Jan Lublinski September 2019 53110 Bonn Carsten von Nahmen Germany © DW Akademie EDITORS AUTHOR Petra Aldenrath Sameer Padania Nadine Jurrat How to fund investigative journalism Insights from the field and its key donors Sameer Padania ABOUT THE REPORT About the report This report is designed to give funders a succinct and accessible introduction to the practice of funding investigative journalism around the world, via major contemporary debates, trends and challenges in the field. It is part of a series from DW Akademie looking at practices, challenges and futures of investigative journalism (IJ) around the world. The paper is intended as a stepping stone, or a springboard, for those who know little about investigative journalism, but who would like to know more. It is not a defense, a mapping or a history of the field, either globally or regionally; nor is it a description of or guide to how to conduct investigations or an examination of investigative techniques. These are widely available in other areas and (to some extent) in other languages already. Rooted in 17 in-depth expert interviews and wide-ranging desk research, this report sets out big-picture challenges and oppor- tunities facing the IJ field both in general, and in specific regions of the world. It provides donors with an overview of the main ways this often precarious field is financed in newsrooms and units large and small. Finally it provides high-level practical ad- vice — from experienced donors and the IJ field — to help new, prospective or curious donors to the field to find out how to get started, and what is important to do, and not to do. -
Beyond Objectivity and Relativism: a View Of
BEYOND OBJECTIVITY AND RELATIVISM: A VIEW OF JOURNALISM FROM A RHETORICAL PERSPECTIVE A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Catherine Meienberg Gynn, B.A., M.A. The Ohio State University 1995 Dissertation Committee Approved by Josina M. Makau Susan L. Kline Adviser Paul V. Peterson Department of Communication Joseph M. Foley UMI Number: 9533982 UMI Microform 9533982 Copyright 1995, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 DEDICATION To my husband, Jack D. Gynn, and my son, Matthew M. Gynn. With thanks to my parents, Alyce W. Meienberg and the late John T. Meienberg. This dissertation is in respectful memory of Lauren Rudolph Michael James Nole Celina Shribbs Riley Detwiler young victims of the events described herein. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express sincere appreciation to Professor Josina M. Makau, Academic Planner, California State University at Monterey Bay, whose faith in this project was unwavering and who continually inspired me throughout my graduate studies, and to Professor Susan Kline, Department of Communication, The Ohio State University, whose guidance, friendship and encouragement made the final steps of this particular journey enjoyable. I wish to thank Professor Emeritus Paul V. Peterson, School of Journalism, The Ohio State University, for guidance that I have relied on since my undergraduate and master's programs, and whose distinguished participation in this project is meaningful to me beyond its significant academic merit. -
An Interview with Sharyl Attkinson
Exclusive: An interview with investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson by Jon Rappoport April 25, 2014; www.nomorefakenews.com Before her recent resignation from CBS, Sharyl Attkisson was a mainstream news star. Multiple Emmys. CNN anchor, CBS anchor on stories about space exploration. Host of CBS’ News Up to the Minute. PBS host for Health Week. Investigative reporter for CBS. Attkisson dug deep into Fast&Furious, Benghazi, and the ill-effects of vaccines. Too deep. Her bosses shut her down and didn’t air key stories. She now has her own website, sharylattkisson.com. She is writing a book, Stonewalled: My Fight for the Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation and Harassment in Obama’s Washington. It’s not every day that a major mainstream journalist leaves the fold and then seeks to expose the corruption that impinged on her work. She agreed to do an email interview. Some of the questions I sent went to the heart of her book-in-progress, so she declined to answer them. However, her answers to my other questions were revealing and explosive. I know you’ve had problems with your Wikipedia page. What happened there? Long story short: there is a concreted effort by special interests who exploit Wikipedia editing privileges to control my biographical page to disparage my reporting on certain topics and skew the information. Judging from the editing, the interest(s) involved relates to the pharmaceutical/vaccine industry. I am far from alone. There is an entire Wikipedia subculture that exists to control pages and topics, and another one that watchdogs all that’s gone wrong with Wikipedia (Wikipediocracy). -
Union Calendar No. 881
1 Union Calendar No. 881 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–1114 ACTIVITIES OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 2, 2019 (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d)(1)) Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdys.gov http://oversight.house.gov/ JANUARY 2, 2016.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 33–945 WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 08, 2019 Jkt 033945 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR1114.XXX HR1114 SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM TREY GOWDY, South Carolina, Chairman JOHN DUNCAN, Tennessee ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland DARRELL ISSA, California CAROLYN MALONEY, New York JIM JORDAN, Ohio ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of MARK SANFORD, South Carolina Columbia JUSTIN AMASH, Michigan WILLIAM LACY CLAY, Missouri PAUL GOSAR, Arizona STEPHEN LYNCH, Massachusetts SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee JIM COOPER, Tennessee VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky ROBIN KELLY, Illinois MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina BRENDA LAWRENCE, Michigan DENNIS ROSS, Florida BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey MARK WALKER, North Carolina RAJA KRISHNAMOORTHI, Illinois ROD BLUM, Iowa JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland JODY B. HICE, Georgia JIMMY GOMEZ, California STEVE RUSSELL, Oklahoma PETER WELCH, Vermont GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania -
The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane
TIMELINE: Congressional Oversight in the Face of Executive Branch and Media Suppression: The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane 2009 FBI opens a counterintelligence investigation of the individual who would become Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source because of his ties to Russian intelligence officers.1 June 2009: FBI New York Field Office (NYFO) interviews Carter Page, who “immediately advised [them] that due to his work and overseas experiences, he has been questioned by and provides information to representatives of [another U.S. government agency] on an ongoing basis.”2 2011 February 2011: CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson begins reporting on “Operation Fast and Furious.” Later in the year, Attkisson notices “anomalies” with several of her work and personal electronic devices that persist into 2012.3 2012 September 11, 2012: Attack on U.S. installations in Benghazi, Libya.4 2013 March 2013: The existence of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server becomes publicly known.5 May 2013: o News reports reveal Obama’s Justice Department investigating leaks of classified information and targeting reporters, including secretly seizing “two months of phone records for reporters and editors of The Associated Press,”6 labeling Fox News reporter James Rosen as a “co-conspirator,” and obtaining a search warrant for Rosen’s personal emails.7 May 10, 2013: Reports reveal that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) targeted and unfairly scrutinized conservative organizations seeking tax-exempt status.8 -
References for L'affaire Wakefield: Shades Of
REFERENCES FOR L’AFFAIRE WAKEFIELD: SHADES OF DREYFUS 1 Alpha-1-Antitrypsin, Autism, And Coeliac Disease, John Walker-Smith and Judith Andrews, The Lancet, 1972; cited by Professor Walker-Smith in his autobiography, Enduring Memories, 2012, p. 211-3; Perinatal Measles Infection And Subsequent Crohn’s Disease. Ekbom A, Wakefield AJ, Zack M, Adami HO. Lancet 1994; Detection Of Immunoreactive Antigen, With A Monoclonal Antibody To Measles Virus, In Tissue From A Patient With Crohn's Disease, Hiroyuki Miyamoto, Tomoyuki Tanaka, Noritoshi Kitamoto, Yoshihiro Fukuda, Takashi Shimoyama, Journal of Gastroenterology, 1995 2 Closed Financial Loops, Kevin De Jesus-Morales and Vinay Prasad , The Hastings Center, 2017 3 Of Measles and Flu, Editor’s Choice, Fiona Godlee, October 2006 4 The Tamiflu Trials, Editorial by Elizabeth Loder, David Tovey, and Fiona Godlee, BMJ, 2014 5 The Next MMR – Could We Do Better? Fiona Godlee, Head of BMJ Knowledge, power point presentation, British National Formulary, 2004 6 Reflections on Investigating Wakefield, Brian Deer, BMJ, February 2, 2010 7 Deposition of Jane Smith, BMJ Deputy Editor June 28, 2012, Wakefield vs. BMJ (Texas litigation) BMJ 8523, p. 45-46 8 How The Case Against The MMR Vaccine Was Fixed, BMJ, January 6, 2011; How The Vaccine Crisis Was Meant To Make Money, BMJ, January 11, 2011; The Lancet’s Two Days To Bury Bad News, BMJ, January 18, 2011 9 Wakefield’s Article Linking MMR Vaccine And Autism Was Fraudulent , Editorial by Fiona Godlee, Editor-in-Chief; Jane Smith, Deputy Editor; Harvey Marcovitz, Associate Editor, BMJ, January 5, 2011 10 CNN, Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, January 5, 2011 92 11 Merck’s MMR is the only one used in the U.S. -
Anti-Vaccine Activists, Web 2.0, and the Postmodern Paradigm –Anoverview Of
Vaccine 30 (2012) 3778–3789 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Vaccine j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vaccine Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm –Anoverview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement ∗ Anna Kata McMaster University, Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, 555 Sanatorium Road Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L9C 1C4 a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Websites opposing vaccination are prevalent on the Internet. Web 2.0, defined by interaction and user- Received 26 May 2011 generated content, has become ubiquitous. Furthermore, a new postmodern paradigm of healthcare has Received in revised form emerged, where power has shifted from doctors to patients, the legitimacy of science is questioned, and 25 September 2011 expertise is redefined. Together this has created an environment where anti-vaccine activists are able to Accepted 30 November 2011 effectively spread their messages. Evidence shows that individuals turn to the Internet for vaccination Available online 13 December 2011 advice, and suggests such sources can impact vaccination decisions – therefore it is likely that anti- vaccine websites can influence whether people vaccinate themselves or their children. This overview Keywords: Anti-vaccination examines the types of rhetoric individuals may encounter online in order to better understand why the anti-vaccination movement can be convincing, despite lacking scientific support for their claims. Tactics Health communication Internet and tropes commonly used to argue against vaccination are described. This includes actions such as skew- Postmodernism ing science, shifting hypotheses, censoring dissent, and attacking critics; also discussed are frequently Vaccines made claims such as not being “anti-vaccine” but “pro-safe vaccines”, that vaccines are toxic or unnatural, Web 2.0 and more. -
What Makes It Different from Other Types of Journalism? Investigative Reporting Has Many, Sometimes Widely Divergent, Meanings
CHAPTER 1 DEFINING INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING What makes it different from other types of journalism? Investigative reporting has many, sometimes widely divergent, meanings. To understand what investigative reporting is, it may be best to start by explaining what it is not. It is said that all reporting is investigative. After all, journalists routinely dig for facts. They ask questions. They get information. They “investigate.” But is this really the case? In the day-to-day practice of journalism, how deep do reporters really dig? How probing are their questions? And how complete or original is the information that they present? If reporters attend a press conference and then write about it, they cannot be said to be doing investigative reporting. If they interview those wounded in a police operation and then report what they have been told, that is not investigative journalism either. The reality is that daily news coverage is usually not probing or investigative. It reports mainly what officials or institutions say as well as other people’s responses to what has been previously said. Much of what we consider “news” are reports on official statements or reactions to official statements. Daily journalism is also mainly about events that reporters have witnessed or interviewed witnesses about—such as a train collision, a demonstration, a criminal being arrested. There is no digging beyond what has been said or what has been seen. Daily news reporting is seldom investigative, it is mostly reactive. Most of the time, journalists react to what is happening or what has been publicly announced. Reporters seldom decide on their own what or who they cover. -
A Method for Measuring Investigative Journalism in Local Newspapers
A method for measuring investigative journalism in local newspapers BRIEF REPORT Eray Turkela,1 , Anish Sahaa, Rhett Carson Owena, Gregory J. Martina, and Shoshana Vassermana aGraduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Edited by Mary C. Waters, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved May 24, 2021 (received for review March 25, 2021) Major changes to the operation of local newsrooms—ownership time span. To address this measurement challenge, we develop restructuring, layoffs, and a reorientation away from print a classification algorithm which mixes supervised and unsuper- advertising—have become commonplace in the last few decades. vised learning approaches to identify investigative news stories. However, there have been few systematic attempts to character- Our classifier is trained to predict investigativeness based on an ize the impact of these changes on the types of reporting that article’s impact on topics discussed in future news stories, and local newsrooms produce. In this paper, we propose a method to text content. The output of our classifier, which is the predicted measure the investigative content of news articles based on arti- probability that a given article is investigative (which we call the cle text and influence on subsequent articles. We use our method “score” or p throughout the paper), is used as the evaluation to examine over-time and cross-sectional patterns in news pro- criterion for our analysis. duction by local newspapers in the United States over the past decade. We find surprising stability in the quantity of investiga- Materials and Methods tive articles produced over most of the time period examined, but Our classifier relies on a comprehensive corpus of news articles published a notable decline in the last 2 y of the decade, corresponding to a by local newspapers across the United States over the past 10 y. -
What Is a Muckraker? (PDF, 67
What Is a Muckraker? President Theodore Roosevelt popularized the term muckrakers in a 1907 speech. The muckraker was a man in John Bunyan’s 1678 allegory Pilgrim’s Progress who was too busy raking through barnyard filth to look up and accept a crown of salvation. Though Roosevelt probably meant to include “mud-slinging” politicians who attacked others’ moral character rather than debating their ideas, the term has stuck as a reference to journalists who investigate wrongdoing by the rich or powerful. Historical Significance In its narrowest sense, the term refers to long-form, investigative journalism published in magazines between 1900 and World War I. Unlike yellow journalism, the reporters and editors of this period valued accuracy and the aggressive pursuit of information, often by searching through mounds of documents and data and by conducting extensive interviews. It sometimes included first- person reporting. Muckraking was seen in action when Ida M. Tarbell exposed the strong-armed practices of the Standard Oil Company in a 19-part series in McClure’s Magazine between 1902 and 1904. Her exposé helped end the company’s monopoly over the oil industry. Her stories include information from thousands of documents from across the nation as well as interviews with current and former executives, competitors, government regulators, antitrust lawyers and academic experts. It was republished as “The Rise of the Standard Oil Company.” Upton Sinclair’s investigation of the meatpacking industry gave rise to at least two significant federal laws, the Meat Inspection Act and the Pure Food and Drug Act. Sinclair spent seven weeks as a worker at a Chicago meatpacking plant and another four months investigating the industry, then published a fictional work based on his findings as serial from February to November of 1905 in a socialist magazine. -
Testimony of Sharyl Attkisson, Sinclair's Full Measure Nonpartisan
Testimony of Sharyl Attkisson, Sinclair’s Full Measure Nonpartisan Investigative Journalist December 3, 2020 I’ve been a nonpartisan journalist for nearly 40 years in local news, CNN, CBS, PBS and the national station group Sinclair. I’ve watched a dramatic devolution in our industry as we’ve allowed ourselves to be transformed itself into tools of political and cooperate interests pushing narratives, manipulating and shaping information on the news and online, and seeking to shape public opinion rather than report facts and various views. In this media landscape, we’ve allowed some of the biggest and most important stories of our time to be covered in a fantastical and one-sided, often inaccurate and incomplete way, while important violations of law and constitutional rights go unchallenged. Tools of intelligence-gathering and law-enforcing, which are meant to protect Americans, are routinely used to instead spy on them, to gather information that isn’t the government’s business, and, in some instances, it appears, to punish or silence those with whom they disagree — personal and political foes, in and out of government. And partly because the news media has dropped the ball, they are unaccountable, operating in an extra-constitutional structure that continues from administration to administration meaning this is not a partisan issue. We have to confront the fact that our intelligence structure and some inside our federal agencies have proven more powerful than Congress, the legislative or judicial branches… have become more influential with the media... and have proven largely immune from prosecution and oversight. Even the President of the United States— whoever it may be— who appoints the leaders in this structure, who directs the national priorities, who serves as commander in chief— plays second fiddle to this structure.