Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications [and Comments and Reply] Author(s): Doug Jones, C. Loring Brace, William Jankowiak, Kevin N. Laland, Lisa E. Musselman, Judith H. Langlois, Lori A. Roggman, Daniel Pérusse, Barbara Schweder, Donald Symons Reviewed work(s): Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 36, No. 5 (Dec., 1995), pp. 723-748 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744016 . Accessed: 09/12/2011 18:16 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Current Anthropology. http://www.jstor.org CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY Volume 36, Number 5, December I995 ? I995 byThe Wenner-GrenFoundation for Anthropological Research. All rightsreserved ooII-3204/95/36o5-0004$3.oo 1JZVO Wl VX V.LIs X11 \s1sX L.... %J1%S XS 11%11a W1l a%.1lAl At4 1Vb13 1 Five Populations"(Human Nature 4:27i-96) and authorof the forthcomingPhysical Attractiveness and the Theoryof Sexual Se- Sexual Selection, lection:Results from Five Populations(Ann Arbor: University of MichiganMuseum ofAnthropology, in press).The presentpaper was submittedI4 XI 94 and accepted2o I 95; the finalversion Physical reachedthe Editor'soffice 24 II 95.