DOCSLIB.ORG

Subsistence Patterns, Social Identity, and Symbolism at the Early Formative Period Site of Cantón Corralito, Chiapas, Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subsistence Patterns, Social Identity, and Symbolism at the Early Formative Period Site of Cantón Corralito, Chiapas, Mexico Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2010 Subsistence Patterns, Social Identity and Symbolism at the Early Formative Period Site of Cantón Corralito, Chiapas, Mexico Cynthia M. Bellacero Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES SUBSISTENCE PATTERNS, SOCIAL IDENTITY AND SYMBOLISM AT THE EARLY FORMATIVE PERIOD SITE OF CANTÓN CORRALITO, CHIAPAS, MEXICO By CYNTHIA M. BELLACERO A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2010 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Cynthia M. Bellacero defended on May 28, 2010. __________________________________ Mary D. Pohl Professor Directing Dissertation __________________________________ Robinson A. Herrera University Representative __________________________________ Lynne A. Schepartz Committee Member __________________________________ Glen H. Doran Committee Member Approved: __________________________________________ Glen H. Doran, Chair, Department of Anthropology __________________________________________ Joseph Travis, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences The Graduate School has verified and approved the above named-named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people aided in the completion of this project. First and foremost, my committee chairperson and advisor Dr. Mary Pohl made the most significant contribution. Dr. Pohl was the inspiration for this project, and without her infinite patience and guidance I could not have completed it. A debt of gratitude is owed to my dissertation committee: Dr. Lynne Schepartz, Dr. Glen Doran, and Dr. Robinson Herrera for volunteering to donate their time and expertise to this project. Thanks to David Cheetham for allowing me access to the soil samples from Cantón Corralito from which the project dataset originated. A special thanks to Dr. David Lentz at the University of Cincinnati for his generosity with both his Mesoamerican botanical collection and his archaeobotanical expertise. Thank you to Dr. Michael Uzendoski who inspired me to integrate social theory into my project in a new and different manner. Thank you to the Florida State University Office of Graduate Studies for awarding me Predissertation Research Grants and the Florida State University Department of Anthropology for granting me the Eisele Predissertation Research Award which funded the initial costs of gathering my data in Mexico and allowed me to purchase equipment needed for the analysis of the botanical specimens. Thank you to the New World Archaeological Foundation in San Cristóbal de las Casas for hosting me during the data collection phase of my project. I would also like to express my gratitude to Elizabeth Brown who volunteered many hours during the analysis phase of the project. I also owe a great deal of thanks to all the archaeologists whose work has been cited within in this project, without them it would not have been possible. Finally, to my family and friends, thank you for all the endless support you have given me and for tolerating my long absences while I traversed the continent or closeted myself away to analyze my dataset and interpret my results. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ......................................................................................................................xi List of Figures .................................................................................................................. xiii Abstract ........................................................................................................................... xvii 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 Research Strategies and Questions ............................................................................. 5 Early Formative Period Pacific Slope Foodways ....................................................... 8 Food and Social Identity ............................................................................................. 9 Chapter Overview ..................................................................................................... 11 2. FOODWAYS AS PART OF A TOTAL SYSTEM OF VALUES ............................... 13 Total Systems of Value............................................................................................. 14 The Role of Cosmology in the Production of Social Value...................................... 15 The Role of Ideology in the Construction of Social Identity.................................... 18 Food as Part of the Total System of Value ............................................................... 23 Luxury Foods and Feasting....................................................................................... 26 Fermented Beverages................................................................................................ 27 Iconography .............................................................................................................. 34 3. FORMATIVE PERIOD MESOAMERICA ................................................................. 39 Cantón Corralito........................................................................................................ 39 Site Ecology.............................................................................................................. 41 The Soconusco Region of the Pacific Slope ............................................................. 43 Cultural Chronology ................................................................................................. 43 The Early Formative Period on the Pacific Slope............................................. 44 iv The Barra Phase ........................................................................................ 45 The Locona Phase ..................................................................................... 46 The Ocós Phase......................................................................................... 47 The Cherla Phase ...................................................................................... 47 The Cuadros Phase.................................................................................... 48 The Jocotal Phase...................................................................................... 48 The Middle Formative Period on the Pacific Slope.......................................... 49 The Conchas Phase ................................................................................... 49 The Late Formative Period on the Pacific Slope .............................................. 50 The Gulf Coast.................................................................................................. 51 Early Formative Period Olman ......................................................................... 53 Middle Formative Period Olman ...................................................................... 54 Late Formative Period Olman........................................................................... 55 Olmec Controversies......................................................................................... 55 Chiefdom versus State .............................................................................. 56 Mother Culture versus Sister Culture Debate ........................................... 57 Food Procurement Strategies .................................................................................... 61 Soconsuco Food Procurement Strategies.......................................................... 61 Manioc ...................................................................................................... 67 Intraregional Variability.................................................................................... 69 Gulf Coast Lowlands Food Procurement Strategies......................................... 70 Olmec and Mokaya Comparisons..................................................................... 75 4. METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................ 78 Sample Processing .................................................................................................... 80 v Analytical Methodology ........................................................................................... 85 Preservational Issues................................................................................................. 87 Identification of Botanicals....................................................................................... 89 5. RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 93 Carbonized Specimens.............................................................................................. 96 Seed Type #3 Talinum triangulare ................................................................... 96 Seed Type #31 Solanum cf. torvum .................................................................. 97 Seed Type #34 Physalis angulata..................................................................... 99 Seed Type #37 Solanum cf. hispidum ............................................................. 100 Seed Types #56 & #57 Zea mays ssp. mays ..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Food, Feathers, and Offerings: Early Formative Period Bird Exploitation at Paso de la Amada, Mexico Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d09k6pk Author Bishop, Katelyn Jo Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Food, Feathers, and Offerings: Early Formative Period Bird Exploitation at Paso de la Amada, Mexico A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Anthropology by Katelyn Jo Bishop 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Food, Feathers, and Offerings: Early Formative Period Bird Exploitation at Paso de la Amada, Mexico by Katelyn Jo Bishop Master of Arts in Anthropology University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Richard G. Lesure, Chair Bird remains from archaeological sites have the potential to inform research on many aspects of prehistoric life. In Mesoamerica, they were a food source, as well as a source of feathers and bone. But they were also components of ritual performance, dedicatory offerings, subjects of iconographic representation, characters in myth, and even deities. Their significance is demonstrated ethnographically, ethnohistorically, and archaeologically. This thesis addresses the role of birds at an Early Formative period ceremonial center on the Pacific coast of Chiapas, Mexico. The avian faunal assemblage from the site of Paso de la Amada was analyzed in order to understand how the exploitation and use of birds articulated with the establishment of hereditary inequality at Paso de la Amada and its emergence as a ceremonial center. Results indicate that birds were exploited as a food source as well as for their feathers and bone, and that they played a particularly strong role in ritual performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert M. Rosenswig
    FAMSI © 2004: Robert M. Rosenswig El Proyecto Formativo Soconusco Traducido del Inglés por Alex Lomónaco Año de Investigación: 2002 Cultura: Olmeca Cronología: Pre-Clásico Ubicación: Soconusco, Chiapas, México Sitio: Cuauhtémoc Tabla de Contenidos Introducción El Proyecto Formativo Soconusco 2002 Análisis en curso Conclusion Lista de Figuras Referencias Citadas Entregado el 6 de septiembre del 2002 por: Robert M. Rosenswig Department of Anthropology Yale University [email protected] Introducción El sitio de Cuauhtémoc está ubicado dentro de una zona del Soconusco que no ha sido documentada con anterioridad y que se encuentra entre las organizaciones estatales del Formativo Temprano de Mazatlán (Clark y Blake 1994), el centro del Formativo Medio de La Blanca (Love 1993) y el centro del Formativo Tardío de Izapa (Lowe et al. 1982) (Figura 1). Aprovechando la refinada cronología del Soconusco (Cuadro 1), el trabajo de campo que se describe a continuación aporta datos que permiten rastrear el desarrollo de Cuauhtémoc durante los primeros 900 años de vida de asentamiento en Mesoamérica. Este período de tiempo está dividido en siete fases cerámicas, y de esta forma, permite que se rastreen, prácticamente siglo por siglo, los cambios ocurridos en todas las clases de cultura material. Estos datos están siendo utilizados para documentar el surgimiento y el desarrollo de las complejidades sociopolíticas en el área. Además de los procesos locales, el objetivo de esta investigación es determinar la naturaleza de las relaciones cambiantes entre las élites de la Costa del Golfo de México y el Soconusco. El trabajo también apunta a ser significativo en lo que respecta a cruzamientos culturales, dado que Mesoamérica es sólo una entre un puñado de áreas del mundo donde la complejidad sociopolítica surgió independientemente, y el Soconusco contiene algunas de las sociedades más tempranas en las que esto ocurrió (Clark y Blake 1994; Rosenswig 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Formative Mexican Chiefdoms and the Myth of the "Mother Culture"
    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19, 1–37 (2000) doi:10.1006/jaar.1999.0359, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Formative Mexican Chiefdoms and the Myth of the “Mother Culture” Kent V. Flannery and Joyce Marcus Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079 Most scholars agree that the urban states of Classic Mexico developed from Formative chiefdoms which preceded them. They disagree over whether that development (1) took place over the whole area from the Basin of Mexico to Chiapas, or (2) emanated entirely from one unique culture on the Gulf Coast. Recently Diehl and Coe (1996) put forth 11 assertions in defense of the second scenario, which assumes an Olmec “Mother Culture.” This paper disputes those assertions. It suggests that a model for rapid evolution, originally presented by biologist Sewall Wright, provides a better explanation for the explosive development of For- mative Mexican society. © 2000 Academic Press INTRODUCTION to be civilized. Five decades of subsequent excavation have shown the situation to be On occasion, archaeologists revive ideas more complex than that, but old ideas die so anachronistic as to have been declared hard. dead. The most recent attempt came when In “Olmec Archaeology” (hereafter ab- Richard Diehl and Michael Coe (1996) breviated OA), Diehl and Coe (1996:11) parted the icy lips of the Olmec “Mother propose that there are two contrasting Culture” and gave it mouth-to-mouth re- “schools of thought” on the relationship 1 suscitation. between the Olmec and the rest of Me- The notion that the Olmec of the Gulf soamerica.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoamerican Ballcourt
    Mesoamerican ballgame The Mesoamerican ballgame or Ōllamaliztli Nahuatl pronunciation: [oːlːamaˈlistɬi] in Nahuatl was a sport with ritual associations played since 1,400 B.C.[1] by the pre-Columbian peoples of Ancient Mexico and Central America. The sport had different versions in different places during the millennia, and a newer more modern version of the game, ulama, is still played in a few places by the indigenous population.[2] The rules of Ōllamaliztli are not known, but judging from its descendant, ulama, they were probably similar to racquetball,[3] where the aim is to keep the ball in play. The stone ballcourt goals (see photo to right) are a late addition to the game. In the most widespread version of the game, the players struck the ball with their hips, although some versions allowed the use of forearms, rackets, bats, or handstones. The ball was made of solid rubber and weighed as much as 4 kg (9 lbs), and sizes differed greatly over time or according to the version played. The game had important ritual aspects, and major formal ballgames were held as ritual events, often featuring human sacrifice. The sport was also played casually for recreation by children and perhaps even women.[4] Pre-Columbian ballcourts have been found throughout Mesoamerica, as far south as Nicaragua, and possibly as far north as what is now the U.S. state of Arizona.[5] These ballcourts vary considerably in size, but all have long narrow alleys with side-walls against which the balls could bounce. Origins Map showing sites where early ballcourts,
    [Show full text]
  • 'Juego De Pelota' Mesoamericano
    Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte / International Journal of Medicine and Science of Physical Activity and Sport ISSN: 1577-0354 [email protected] Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Rodríguez-López, J.; Vicente-Pedraz,España M.; Mañas-Bastida, A . CULTURA DE PASO DE LA AMADA, CREADOR A DEL ‘JUEGO DE PELOTA’ MESOAMERICANO Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte / International Journal of Medicine and Science of Physical Activity and Sport, vol. 16, núm. 61, marzo, 2016, pp. 69-83 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid, España Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=54244745006 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Rev.int.med.cienc.act.fís.deporte - vol. 16 - número 61 - ISSN: 1577-0354 Rodríguez-López, J.; Vicente-Pedraz, M. y Mañas-Bastida, A. (2016) Cultura de paso de la amada, creadora del ‘juego de pelota’ mesoamericano / Culture of paso de la amada, creator of ‘mesoamerican ballgame’. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte vol. 16 (61) pp. 69-83. Http://cdeporte.rediris.es/revista/revista61/artcultura670.htm DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2016.61.006 ORIGINAL CULTURA DE PASO DE LA AMADA, CREADORA DEL ‘JUEGO DE PELOTA’ MESOAMERICANO CULTURE OF PASO DE LA AMADA, CREATOR OF ‘MESOAMERICAN BALLGAME’ Rodríguez-López, J.1; Vicente-Pedraz, M.2 y Mañas-Bastida, A.3 1 Profesor Titular, Doctor en Medicina, Departamento de Educación Física y Deportiva, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Granada, España.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Los Orígenes De Privilegio En El Soconusco, 1650 Ac
    Clark, John E. y Mary E. Pye 2006 Los orígenes de privilegio en el Soconusco, 1650 AC: Dos décadas de investigación. En XIX Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, 2005 (editado por J.P. Laporte, B. Arroyo y H. Mejía), pp.10-22. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala (versión digital). 2 LOS ORÍGENES DE PRIVILEGIO EN EL SOCONUSCO, 1650 AC: DOS DÉCADAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN John E. Clark Mary E. Pye Palabras clave Arqueología Maya, México, Chiapas, Soconusco, Guatemala, Costa del Pacífico, Mazatán, Paso de la Amada, complejidad social, surgimiento de desigualdad social, cacicazgos, Arcaico, Preclásico Temprano THE ORIGINS OF PRIVILEDGE IN SOCONUSCO, 1650 BC: TWO DECADES OF RESEARCH From the first excavations at the sites of Izapa and Altamira in the 1960s, the Fundación Arqueológica del Nuevo Mundo has been involved in studies on the Formative period in Soconusco, Chiapas. Preliminary work by Gareth Lowe and others established the presence of flourishing villages and the early use of ceramics. From 1985 and during the last 20 years, this tradition has continued with reconnaissance and excavations all over the area of Mazatan, located on the Pacific Coast of Chiapas. The past two decades have brought to light some important features of the ancient villages, including a ball court and the residence of a leader. This paper will present the major findings in the Mazatan and Soconusco area which is perhaps the best known region in Mesoamerica during the Early Formative. En este trabajo se presentan los resultados de investigaciones arqueológicas llevadas a cabo desde 1985 en el Soconusco, particularmente en la zona de Mazatán.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Los Orígenes Del Privilegio En El Soconusco, 1650 Ac
    Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital ISSN: 1870-4115 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Clark, John E.; Pye, Mary E. Los orígenes del privilegio en el soconusco, 1650 a.c.: dos décadas de investigación Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital, núm. 2, 2006, p. 0 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=90600208 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Pueblos y Fronteras digital Año 2006, número 2 Historia y Antropología del deporte http://www.pueblosyfronteras.unam.mx MISCELÁNEA LOS ORÍGENES DEL PRIVILEGIO EN EL SOCONUSCO , 1650 A.C.: DOS DÉCADAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN John E. Clark y Mary E. Pye NEW WORLD ARCHAEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION En este trabajo presentamos los resultados más sobresalientes de las investigaciones arqueológicas practicadas desde 1985 en el Soconusco, Chiapas, México (figura 1), particularmente en la zona de Mazatán. Hemos investigado los orígenes de la desigualdad social en esta región, un tema complejo que implica varias preguntas secundarias concernientes a la herencia del privilegio a lo largo del tiempo. Aunque nuestras investigaciones de campo empezaron como parte de los estudios doctorales de Clark (1994), han incluido a muchas personas y proyectos de investigación desde el principio, especialmente a Michael Blake y sus estudiantes. Con el tiempo los cuestionamientos originales han sido modificados a la luz de nuevos datos.
    [Show full text]
  • Soconusco Formative Project
    FAMSI © 2002: Robert M. Rosenswig Soconusco Formative Project Research Year: 2002 Culture: Olmec Chronology: Pre-Classic Location: Soconusco, Chiapas, México Site: Cuauhtémoc Table of Contents Introduction Soconusco Formative Project 2002 Analysis in Progress Conclusion List of Figures Sources Cited Submitted 09/16/2002 by: Robert M. Rosenswig Department of Anthropology Yale University [email protected] Introduction The Cuauhtémoc site is located within a previously undocumented zone of the Soconusco between the Early Formative Mazatán polities (Clark and Blake 1994), the Middle Formative center of La Blanca (Love 1993) and the Late Formative center of Izapa (Lowe et al. 1982) (see Figure 1). Taking advantage of the refined Soconuscan chronology (Table 1), the fieldwork described below provides data to track developments at Cuauhtémoc over the first 900 years of settled life in Mesoamerica. This time period is divided into seven ceramic phases, and so, allows for changes in all classes of material culture to be tracked on almost a century-by-century basis. These data are being used to document the emergence and development of sociopolitical complexity in the area. In addition to local processes, the goal of this research is to determine the nature of changing relations between elites on the Gulf Coast of México and the Soconusco. The work also aims to be significant cross-culturally as Mesoamerica is one of only a handful of areas in the world where sociopolitical complexity emerged independently and the Soconusco contains some
    [Show full text]
  • Cantón Corralito: Objects from a Possible Gulf Olmec Colony
    FAMSI © 2007 David Cheetham Cantón Corralito: Objects from a Possible Gulf Olmec Colony Figure 1. Map of Mazatan and the Olmec Heartland (inset). Research Year: 2005 Culture: Olmec Chronology: Late Archaic to Early Formative Location: México Site: Cantón Corralito Table of Contents Introduction Background Methods and Preliminary Results Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis Pottery Classification and Morphology “Chicharras and San Lorenzo Ceramic Complexes, San Lorenzo” “Cherla and Cuadros Ceramic Complexes, Cantón Corralito” Style and Design Structure “Early Olmec Figurines from Two Regions: Style as Cultural Imperative” Other Items Summary List of Figures Sources Cited Introduction This illustrative project is one component of a larger study investigating the nature of social relations between the Gulf Coast and Pacific Coast regions during the early Olmec horizon (1150-1000 bc, uncalibrated). My overall interest lies in determining if Gulf Coast Olmec peoples established a colony along the Pacific Coast at the site of Cantón Corralito (Cheetham 2006a), which was about 25 hectares in size at the time and centrally located in the heart of the Mazatan zone about 400 km south of the Gulf Olmec heartland (Figure 1). The site has a long history of occupation beginning in the Late Archaic period (ca. 2500-2000 bc) and then the Early Formative Barra, Locona, Ocós, Cherla, and Cuadros phases (ca. 1600-1000 bc). Near the end of the Cuadros phase Cantón Corralito was completely destroyed by river floodwaters and covered by a thick (1.0-2.5 m) layer of sand and alluvium, making it a sort of aquatic version of Pompeii. With financial aid from the New World Archaeological Foundation (NWAF) and the Reinhart Foundation, the site was excavated between April-July of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Evidence of the Ballgame in Oaxaca, Mexico
    Early evidence of the ballgame in Oaxaca, Mexico Jeffrey P. Blomster1 Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052 Edited* by Michael D. Coe, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved April 6, 2012 (received for review February 27, 2012) As a defining characteristic of Mesoamerican civilization, the ball- both the Maya Maize God and its royal impersonators dressed game has a long and poorly understood history. Because the ball- as ballplayers. game is associated with the rise of complex societies, understand- The ballgame did not operate in a vacuum but was tied with ing its origins also illuminates the evolution of socio-politically other social and political practices. The ballgame expressed cos- complex societies. Although initial evidence, in the form of ceramic mological concepts about how the world operated, and political figurines, dates to 1700 BCE, and the oldest known ballcourt dates leaders, responsible for providing life and fertility, were closely to 1600 BCE, the ritual paraphernalia and ideology associated with linked with this social practice. Not coincidentally, the ballgame the game appear around 1400 BCE, the start of the so-called Early appeared around the same time as rank or chieflysocietyandhas Horizon, defined by the spread of Olmec-style symbols across Mes- been implicated as central to the processes of social differentiation oamerica. Early Horizon evidence of ballgame paraphernalia both (4, 5). The earliest depiction in monumental art of public leaders, identical to and different from that of the Gulf Coast Olmec can be the Early Horizon colossal heads of the Olmec, has been inter- seen on figurines from coastal Chiapas and the central highlands preted as sporting headgear related to the ballgame (6).
    [Show full text]
  • Chiapas Layout.Indd
    to about 1050 b.c. Although the overall arrangement is utterly cultural affiliation of the ancient Cantón Corralito residents is unique for this time period, archaeologists Ponciano Ortiz and unresolved. Still, the evidence gathered to date suggests they Carmen Rodríguez recently discovered hundreds of jade and were Gulf Olmecs or a mix of indigenous Mokayas and Gulf serpentine axes at sites close to San Lorenzo. They were also Olmecs, meaning that several aspects of the “mother culture” deposited as offerings and, according to archaeologist and jade interpretation would be relevant, including the ability of San expert Olaf Jaime Riveron, came from the same source as the Lorenzo’s leaders to marshal the resources necessary to create axes at Cantón Corralito: a boulder concentration along the and sustain such a colony. steep banks of the Motagua River in eastern Guatemala. Despite an apparent mastery of local politics, the people of If Cantón Corralito was a colony of Gulf Olmecs, trade Cantón Corralito were no match for nature’s fury. One fateful and the search for exotic materials may have been the motives stormy day about 1000 b.c. the nearby Coatán River began for its founding. For travel between the Olmec heartland and to rise. Before long the town was engulfed by the sands of its areas to the south, the Pacific Coast was a much better route rapidly shifting channel, the residents no doubt fleeing to safer than the mountainous interior. The Soconusco would have ground and a new life. Thus ended the occupation of what been a strategic control point.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Jec4\Documents\CV.2017
    February 20, 2019 VITAE (Feb. 2019) JOHN E. CLARK Work Phone: 801-422-3822 Work Fax: 801-422-0021 e-mail: [email protected] DEGREES B. S. (1976) Anthropology, Brigham Young University M. A. (1979) Anthropology, Brigham Young University Thesis: A Method for the Analysis of Mesoamerica Lithic Industries: An Application to the Obsidian Industry of La Libertad, Chiapas, Mexico Ph. D. (1994) Anthropology, University of Michigan Dissertation: The Development of Early Formative Rank Societies in the Soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico EMPLOYMENT 1977 Laboratory Assistant for the New World Archaeological Foundation (NWAF) 1978-1981 Laboratory supervisor, NWAF 1982-1984 Staff archaeologist and Laboratory Assistant, NWAF 1985-1987 Archaeologist, NWAF 1987-2009 Director of the NWAF 1990-2018 Faculty of Anthropology department TEACHING 1976: Introduction to Archaeology and Field Methods, Brigham Young University 1977: Primitive Technology, BYU 1981: Museum Techniques, University of Michigan [TA to Richard I. Ford] 1990-1993: Instructor, BYU Archaeology of Social and Political Complexity 390R and 690R Economic Anthropology 433 Anthropology Theory 505 Ancient Technology 207 Social Organization 534 Myth and Ritual in the Southwest U.S. 390R Political Anthropology 432 1994-1995: Assistant Professor, BYU Ancient Technology 207 Political Anthropology 432 Social Organization 534 Anthropology of Gender 390R 1996-1999: Associate Professor, BYU Archaeology of the Olmecs 690R 1 Economic Anthropology 520 Anthropology Theory 505 Ancient Technology 207 Mesoamerican Kingship
    [Show full text]