Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form Styphelia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form Styphelia Short form Threatened species nomination form (Version Mar 2016) Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form For nominations under the Common Assessment Method (CAM) where supporting information is available, but not in a format suitable for demonstrating compliance with the CAM, and assessment against the IUCN Red List threat status. Cover Page (Office use only) Species name (scientific and common name): Styphelia longissima Previously known as Leucopogon sp. ciliate Eneabba (F. Obbens & C. Godden s.n. 3/7/2003) Nomination for (addition, deletion, change): Addition Nominated conservation category and criteria: Critically Endangered: B1ab(iii,v)+B2ab(iii,v) Scientific committee assessment of eligibility against the criteria: This assessment is consistent with the standards set out in Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and Yes No 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding. A. Population size reduction B. Geographic range C. Small population size and decline D. Very small or restricted population E. Quantitative analysis Outcome: Scientific committee Meeting date: Scientific committee comments: Recommendation: Ministerial approval: Date of Gazettal/ Legislative effect: Page 1 of 7 Nomination summary (to be completed by nominator) Current conservation status Scientific name: Styphelia longissima Previously known as Leucopogon sp. ciliate Eneabba (F. Obbens & C. Godden s.n. 3/7/2003) Common name: None Family name: Ericaceae Fauna Flora Nomination for: Listing Change of status Delisting 1. Is the species currently on any conservation list, either in a State or Territory, Australia or Internationally? Provide details of the occurrence and listing status for each jurisdiction in the following table 2. Is it present in an Australian jurisdiction, but not listed? State / Territory in Date listed or Listing category i.e. Listing criteria i.e. Jurisdiction which the species assessed (or critically endangered B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) occurs N/A) or ‘none’ International (IUCN Red List) National (EPBC Act) State / Territory 1. WA 22/1/2008 Vulnerable D1+D2 2016 Vulnerable D1 5/4/2017 Critically Endangered B1ab(iii,v)+B2ab(iii,v) Consistent with Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding, it is confirmed that: this assessment meets the standard of evidence required by the Common Assessment Yes No Method to document the eligibility of the species under the IUCN criteria; Comments: surveys of the species were adequate to inform the assessment; Yes No Comments: Extensive surveys have been undertaken by the Department of Parks and Wildlife and environmental consultants to the mining tenement holder, Iluka Resources. No additional subpopulations have been discovered. the conclusion of the assessment remains current and that any further information Yes No that may have become available since the assessment was completed supports or is consistent with the conclusion of the assessment. Comments: The number of mature individuals was estimated as 300-400 when the subpopulation was partially surveyed in 2003 prior to the last assessed in 2007, and reported as being reasonably healthy. Intensive survey of the existing population (individual plants GPSed) undertaken for Iluka Resources between 2003 and 2007, and reported in 2008, increased the number of mature individuals to 2188, but also made the following observations: Page 2 of 7 “…the relatively small percentage of the population composed of juvenile plants indicates that the population is mature and possibly senescing.” and “The small number of juveniles coupled with the presence of dead and stressed individuals (mature and juvenile) indicates that the population is experiencing stress and is therefore under threat.” With the population estimated to be 2188 individuals, criterion D1 is no longer eligible. However the reports that the population is under stress, and a large number of dead and stressed/very stressed individuals recorded, shows that the species is undergoing continuing decline and now meets criteria for critically endangered. Named as Styphelia longissima on 16/3/2017. Nominated national conservation status: category and criteria Presumed extinct (EX) Critically endangered (CR) Endangered (EN) Vulnerable (VU) None (least concern) Data Deficient Conservation Dependent What are the IUCN Red List criteria that support the recommended B1ab(iii,v)+B2ab(iii,v) conservation status category? Eligibility against the IUCN Red List criteria (A, B, C, D and E) Provide justification for the nominated conservation status; is the species eligible or ineligible for listing against the five criteria. For delisting, provide details for why the species no longer meets the requirements of the current conservation status. A. Population size reduction Insufficient data to assess (evidence of decline) B. Geographic range EOO and AOO 4km2 (EOO and AOO, number of Known from 1 location locations and evidence of Continuing decline observed and projected in the quality of habitat decline) (hydrology, weeds and past chaining) and number of mature individuals Meets criteria for Critically Endangered B1ab(iii,v)+B2ab(iii,v) C. Small population size and Number of mature individual 2188 decline Continuing decline observed and projected in the number of mature (population size, distribution individuals and evidence of decline) Meets criteria for Endangered C2(a)(ii) D. Very small or restricted Number of mature individual 2188 population Does not meet criteria (population size) E. Quantitative analysis Insufficient data to assess (statistical probability of extinction) Summary of assessment information Page 3 of 7 EOO Calculated to 4km2 based on AOO 4km2 (2x2km grid method). Generation Unknown AOO estimation (0.135km2 using length Area of remnant vegetation 0.135km2. a minimum convex polygon around the mature individuals as actual measure) No. locations 1 Severely fragmented Yes No Unknown No. subpopulations 1 No. mature individuals 2188 Percentage global population within Australia 100 Percentage population decline over 10 years or 3 generations Unknown Threats (detail how the species is being impacted) Threat Extent Impact (describe the threat and how it impacts on the (give details of impact on (what is the level of threat to the species. Specify if the threat is past, current or whole species or specific conservation of the species) potential) subpopulations) Mining – the remnant is within an active mining Whole species Low – the protected status of the tenement and prospective for mineral sands. species provides a level of protection to the remnant. Past, current, future Hydrological impacts – mineral sand mining is Whole species High – Mining has occurred to occurring immediately adjacent to the population the south, west and north of the which may be causing local lowering of the water remnant (see figure below) with table. rehabilitation leaving the landscape lower than prior to Past, current, future mining. The potential for a lowering of the water table under the remnant is high. Weeds – the remnant is open sandplain vegetation Whole species Low – while remnant is not that is subject to weeds. further disturbed weed risk is low, but would be a significant Past, current, future issue if the vegetation is burnt. Fire – the remnant is surrounded by cleared land. A Whole species High – recurrent fire will degrade single fire could impact the whole site. the remnant and impact the Regeneration would be dependent on fire frequency mature individuals. and resultant weed infestation. Past, current, future Clearing – the remnant is isolate due to previous Whole species High – clearing would have clearing for agriculture and/or mining. The remnant reduced the size of the was previously chained in preparation for clearing, population, has degraded the but allowed to regrow. existing remnant, and has removed any buffer to the Past current population. Phytophthora dieback – other species of Whole species Moderate – the susceptibility of Leucopogon/Styphelia are susceptible to dieback, this species to Phytophthora is and the species occurs within the dieback risk zone. unknown, and the sandy soil and now raised nature of the Page 4 of 7 Future remnant landscape may reduce the risk from dieback, but it is a potential risk. Rabbits Whole species Low– rabbits not currently Grazing impacts on the establishment of identified as a threat, but have seedlings and thereby limiting natural the potential to impact the recruitment. population if they become Disturbance to plants and roots from rabbit established in the area. diggings. Potential future Management and Recovery Is there a Recovery Plan (RP) or Conservation Management Plan operational for the Yes No species? List all relevant recovery or management plans (including draft, in-preparation, out-of-date, national and State/Territory recovery plans, recovery plans for other species or ecological communities, or other management plans that may benefit or be relevant to the nominated species). N/a List current management or research actions, if any, that are being undertaken that benefit the conservation of the species. Monitoring is being carried out at subpopulation to determine plant numbers, condition and impact of threats; Surveys have been undertaken in the region to find new occurrences, but have been unsuccessful; The subpopulation is fenced; The mining company is aware of the population and is protecting it from direct impact. List further recommended management or research actions,
Recommended publications
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids
    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Native Plant Species for Superb Fairy-Wren Habitat
    Suggested local native plant species for Superb Fairy-wren habitat Extract from the report, Superb Fairy-Wren Habitat in Glebe and Forest Lodge, S. Stevens, The Glebe Society, Sydney, 2008. The plants listed are thought to have been indigenous to inner-western Sydney prior to white settlement. Emphasis in this list is on plants that should be fairly easily obtainable, but a few that may be difficult to obtain at present, such as Epacrids and some Peas, and plants such as Epacrids have traditionally been difficult to propagate, have been included to indicate the variety of plants that are suitable for Superb Fairy-wren habitat, and with a view that these plant species may be available in the future. Indeed, highlighting them as suitable small bird habitat may influence some nurseries to add them to their stocklists. Botanical Name Common Name Height (m) Paperbarks Melaleuca armillaris Bracelet Honeymyrtle 5 Melelauca decora a Paperbark 7 Melaleuca ericifolia Swamp Paperbark 8 Melaleuca linariifolia* Snow-in-summer 8 Melaleuca nodosa p Ball Honeymyrtle 6 Melaleuca styphelioides* p Prickly-leafed Paperbark 10 Tea-trees Leptospermum squarrosum* Pink Tea tree 3 Leptospermum polygalifolium * Lemon-scented Tea tree 3 Leptospermum trinervium Paperbark/Slender Tea-tree 4 Wattles Acacia binervia Coast Myall 4 Acacia falcata Sickle Wattle 3 Acacia fimbriata* Fringed Wattle 3 Acacia floribunda* White Sally Wattle 4 Acacia implexa Hickory Wattle 8 Acacia linifolia* White Wattle 3 Acacia longifolia* Sydney Golden Wattle 4 Acacia parramattensis Parramatta
    [Show full text]
  • Brian Everingham, Tony Galceran, Ken Griffiths, Graham Grocott, Roger Lembit, Allen Lowe, Gary Schoer, Mike Scotland, Suzanne Wicks and Helen Zammitt
    Tuesday 27th June 2017 Curra Moors Party: Kay Elliott, Brian Everingham, Tony Galceran, Ken Griffiths, Graham Grocott, Roger Lembit, Allen Lowe, Gary Schoer, Mike Scotland, Suzanne Wicks and Helen Zammitt Length: 10km Grade: 2 It’s a delightful short meander through forest and heath, interrupted by the songs of a practising Lyrebird and by floral tributes, even in the midst of winter. Styphelia viridis Styphelia viridis, commonly called green five corners is a plant in the heather family, Ericaceae and is endemic to the east coast of Australia. It owes its common name to the appearance of its fruit - a drupe with a flat top and five distinct ribs, and to the colour of its flowers. The flowers are a translucent bottle-green. The sepals are green, 8.5–16 millimetres (0.3– 0.6 in) long and glabrous. The petals are fused into a tube 14–23 millimetres (0.6–0.9 in) long with the ends of the petals rolled back, exposing the hairy inner surface of the tube. The filaments of the stamens and the style extend well beyond the tube, both about 10–16 millimetres (0.4–0.6 in) long. The anthers are brown and a further 3.2–6.3 millimetres (0.1–0.2 in) long. Flowering occurs from April to August and is followed by the fruit which is a flat-topped, five-sided greenish-red drupe. Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Styphelia_viridis 1 | P a g e Ricinocarpos pinifolius – Wedding Bush Ricinocarpos pinifolius is the most widespread member of the genus and is a conspicuous member of coastal heath and woodland communities when it is in flower during spring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flower Chain the Early Discovery of Australian Plants
    The Flower Chain The early discovery of Australian plants Hamilton and Brandon, Jill Douglas Hamilton Duchess of University of Sydney Library Sydney, Australia 2002 http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/ozlit © University of Sydney Library. The texts and images are not to be used for commercial purposes without permission Source Text: Prepared with the author's permission from the print edition published by Kangaroo Press Sydney 1998 All quotation marks are retained as data. First Published: 1990 580.994 1 Australian Etext Collections at botany prose nonfiction 1940- women writers The flower chain the early discovery of Australian plants Sydney Kangaroo Press 1998 Preface Viewing Australia through the early European discovery, naming and appreciation of its flora, gives a fresh perspective on the first white people who went to the continent. There have been books on the battle to transform the wilderness into an agriculturally ordered land, on the convicts, on the goldrush, on the discovery of the wealth of the continent, on most aspects of settlement, but this is the first to link the story of the discovery of the continent with the slow awareness of its unique trees, shrubs and flowers of Australia. The Flower Chain Chapter 1 The Flower Chain Begins Convict chains are associated with early British settlement of Australia, but there were also lighter chains in those grim days. Chains of flowers and seeds to be grown and classified stretched across the oceans from Botany Bay to Europe, looping back again with plants and seeds of the old world that were to Europeanise the landscape and transform it forever.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants of Sydney Harbour National Park: Historical Records and Species Lists, and Their Value for Conservation Monitoring
    Native plants of Sydney Harbour National Park: historical records and species lists, and their value for conservation monitoring Doug Benson National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Mrs Macquaries Rd, Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA [email protected] Abstract: Sydney Harbour National Park (lat 33° 53’S; long 151° 13’E), protects significant vegetation on the harbour foreshores close to Sydney City CBD; its floristic abundance and landscape beauty has been acknowledged since the writings of the First Fleet in 1788. Surprisingly, although historical plant collections were made as early as1802, and localised surveys have listed species for parts of the Park since the 1960s, a detailed survey of the flora of whole Park is still needed. This paper provides the first definitive list of the c.400 native flora species for Sydney Harbour National Park (total area 390 ha) showing occurrence on the seven terrestrial sub-regions or precincts (North Head, South Head, Dobroyd Head, Middle Head, Chowder Head, Bradleys Head and Nielsen Park). The list is based on historical species lists, records from the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (formerly Dept of Environment, Climate Change and Water) Atlas, National Herbarium of New South Wales specimen details, and some additional fieldwork. 131 species have only been recorded from a single precinct site and many are not substantiated with a recent herbarium specimen (though there are historical specimens from the general area for many). Species reported in the sources but for which no current or historic specimen exists are listed separately as being of questionable/non-local status.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Backdrop to encounter: the 1770 landscape of Botany Bay, the plants collected by Banks and Solander and rehabilitation of natural vegetation at Kurnell Doug Benson1 and Georgina Eldershaw2 1Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] 2Parks & Wildlife Division, Dept of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 375 Kurnell NSW 2231 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] Abstract: The first scientific observations on the flora of eastern Australia were made at Botany Bay in April–May 1770. We discuss the landscapes of Botany Bay and particularly of the historic landing place at Kurnell (lat 34˚ 00’ S, long 151˚ 13’ E) (about 16 km south of central Sydney), as described in the journals of Lieutenant James Cook and Joseph Banks on the Endeavour voyage in 1770. We list 132 plant species that were collected at Botany Bay by Banks and Daniel Solander, the first scientific collections of Australian flora. The list is based on a critical assessment of unpublished lists compiled by authors who had access to the collection of the British Museum (now Natural History Museum), together with species from material at National Herbarium of New South Wales that has not been previously available. The list includes Bidens pilosa which has been previously regarded as an introduced species. In 1770 the Europeans set foot on Aboriginal land of the Dharawal people. Since that time the landscape has been altered in response to a succession of different land-uses; farming and grazing, commemorative tree planting, parkland planting, and pleasure ground and tourist visitation.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Flora of Australia
    L'IBRARY'OF THE GRAY HERBARIUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY. BOUGHT. THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEING AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. r^/f'ORElGN&ENGLISH' <^ . 1859. i^\BOOKSELLERS^.- PR 2G 1.912 Gray Herbarium Harvard University ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION. I I / ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEIKG AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. Reprinted from the JJotany of the Antarctic Expedition, Part III., Flora of Tasmania, Vol. I. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1859. PRINTED BY JOHN EDWARD TAYLOR, LITTLE QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS. CONTENTS OF THE INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. § i. Preliminary Remarks. PAGE Sources of Information, published and unpublished, materials, collections, etc i Object of arranging them to discuss the Origin, Peculiarities, and Distribution of the Vegetation of Australia, and to regard them in relation to the views of Darwin and others, on the Creation of Species .... iii^ § 2. On the General Phenomena of Variation in the Vegetable Kingdom. All plants more or less variable ; rate, extent, and nature of variability ; differences of amount and degree in different natural groups of plants v Parallelism of features of variability in different groups of individuals (varieties, species, genera, etc.), and in wild and cultivated plants vii Variation a centrifugal force ; the tendency in the progeny of varieties being to depart further from their original types, not to revert to them viii Effects of cross-impregnation and hybridization ultimately favourable to permanence of specific character x Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection ; — its effects on variable organisms under varying conditions is to give a temporary stability to races, species, genera, etc xi § 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ericaceae (Heath) Walkabout KWG
    Ericaceae (Heath) Walkabout KWG Many members of the plant family Ericaceae are growing in Ku-ring-gai Wildflower Garden. Some examples of these close to walking tracks have been labelled. Take a walk through the garden and see if you can find them. The pictures shown below will help you identify them. Below and underneath each picture a few key features are noted. Have fun! Fuller descriptions of these plants can be found on Australian Plants Society – North Shore Group Blandfordia website: https://austplants.com.au/North-Shore/ in “Notes” on the Walks & Talks page. Excellent pictures can be found on the Hornsby Library website: www.hornsby.nsw.gov.au/library under: eLibrary, Learning and Research, Hornsby Herbarium. Detailed botanical descriptions are given in the PlantNET website: https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/ Styphelia tubiflora: Woollsia pungens: Leucopogon juniperinus: pointed leaves; red tubular pointed leaves; white flowers, sharply pointed leaves; flowers with curled lobes and floral tube topped by broad, long white floral tube with protruding stamens slightly “corrugated” lobes short lobes Leucopogon setiger: Leucopogon ericoides: Leucopogon microphyllus: pointed leaves; white, bell- pointed leaves; small, white, tiny rounded leaves; shaped flowers drooping stalkless flowers borne in small, hairy, white flowers from leaf axils leaf axils at ends of branches Epacris longiflora: Epacris pulchella: Epacris microphylla: pointed leaves; tubular, pointed leaves; white (sometimes small pointed leaves; white, red flower with white pink) flowers spreading broadly non-hairy floral tube; unopened spreading tip at tip buds in long row on stem PLEASE RETURN THIS SHEET (IF LAMINATED) AFTER USE Ericaceae Walk Ku-ring-gai Wildflower Garden Woollsia pungens and (to a lesser extent) Styphelia tubiflora occur on most tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY NUMBER 17 Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae Martin Lawrence Grant, F. Raymond Fosberg, and Howard M. Smith SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1974 ABSTRACT Grant, Martin Lawrence, F. Raymond Fosberg, and Howard M. Smith. Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 17, 85 pages, 1974.-Results of a botanical inves- tigation of the Society Islands carried out by Grant in 1930 and 1931, and subsequent work on the material collected and other collections in the U.S. herbaria and other published works are reported herein. This paper is a partial descriptive flora of the Society group with a history of the botanical exploration and investigation of the area. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Srnithsonian Year. SI PRESS NUMBER 5056. SERIES COVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllurn juponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Grant, Martin Lawrence, 1907-1968. Partial flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae. (Smithsonian contributions to botany, no. 17) Supt. of Docs. no.: SI 1.29:17. 1. Botany-Society Islands. I. Fosberg, Francis Raymond, 1908- , joint author. 11. Smith, Howard Malcolm, 1939- , joint author. 111. Title. IV. Series: Smithsonian Institution. Smith- sonian contributions to botany, no. 17. QK1.2747 no. 17 581’.08s [581.9’96’21] 73-22464 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, US. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Price $1.75 (paper cover) The senior author, after spending almost a year during 1930 and 1931 in the Society Islands, collecting herbarium material and ecological data, worked inten- sively on a comprehensive flora of this archipelago for the next five years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Victorian Naturalist
    J The Victorian Naturalist Volume 113(1) 199 February Club of Victoria Published by The Field Naturalists since 1884 MUSEUM OF VICTOR A 34598 From the Editors Members Observations As an introduction to his naturalist note on page 29, George Crichton had written: 'Dear Editors late years the Journal has become I Was not sure if it was of any relevance, as of ' very scientific, and ordinary nature reports or gossip of little importance We would be very sorry if members felt they could not contribute to The Victorian Naturalist, and we assure all our readers that the editors would be more than pleased to publish their nature reports or notes. We can, however, only print material that we actually receive and you are encouraged to send in your observations and notes or suggestions for topics you would like to see published. These articles would be termed Naturalist Notes - see in our editorial policy below. Editorial Policy Scope The Victorian Naturalist publishes articles on all facets of natural history. Its primary aims are to stimulate interest in natural history and to encourage the publication of arti- cles in both formal and informal styles on a wide range of natural history topics. Authors may submit the material in the following forms: Research Reports - succinct and original scientific communications. Contributions - may consist of reports, comments, observations, survey results, bib- liographies or other material relating to natural history. The scope is broad and little defined to encourage material on a wide range of topics and in a range of styles. This allows inclusion of material that makes a contribution to our knowledge of natural his- tory but for which the traditional format of scientific papers is not appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition of the 1961/62, the Opportunity to Study Epacridaceae
    Florae Malesianae Precursores XXXVII. Materials towards the knowledge of the Epacridaceae Mainly in Asia, Malaysia, and the Pacific H. Sleumer Rijksherbarium, Leyden in first for the extra-Australian In the present work details are given the place Lebetanthus of which forms the base for Epacridaceae except (South America), a part revision of and for ‘Pacific Plant Areas’. my the family for the ‘Flora Malesiana’ Key of of to the subgenera and sections the genus Styphelia, to the Malaysian species Styphelia, all of and the of the to species Styphelia subgen. Cyathodes, to species genus Trochocarpa are added. During visits to the following herbaria specimens have been examined: Natural History Museum, London (BM), Brisbane (BRI), Berkeley (UC), Geneva (G), Gray Herbarium, Cambridge (A, GH), Honolulu (BISH), Kew (K), Lae (LAE), Manila (PNH), New York (NY), Paris (P), Sydney (SYD) and Utrecht (U), besides the speci- mens at Leiden (L) and the ones sent on loan from Bogor (BO) and Singapore (SING). 2nd As a memberof the Expedition of the Rijksherbarium to New Guinea in 1961/62, I had the opportunity to study Epacridaceae in the Cycloop Mts, in the Eastern Highlands and in the Vogelkop Peninsula. During a 3-weeks stay in the Hawaiian Islands, thanks to the kind hospitality of Dr Otto & Isa Degener, Waialua, and of Mr Herbert Shipman, able from Hilo, I was to visit Oahu, Kauai, Maui, and Hawaii, collecting 'pukeawe' sealevel in Australian observed in the up to 3000 m numerous places. Epacridaceae were field during excursions with Mr S. L. Everist and Mr L. S.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Maui Plant Cluster (Hawaii)
    Recovery Plan for the Maui Plant Cluster (Hawaii) US Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon July 1997 RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE MAUI PLANT CLUSTER Published By U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon ~Lao~J. ~ Approved: Regi al Director, U.S. F ildlife Service Date: DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for task implementation and/or time for achievement ofrecovery are only estimates and subject to change. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official positions nor approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position ofthe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion ofrecovery tasks. LITERATURE CITATION: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1997. Recovery Plan for the Maui Plant Cluster. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. 130 pp. + appendices ADDITIONAL COPIES MAY BE PURCHASED FROM: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 telephone: 301/492-6403 or 1-800-582-3421 fax: 301/564-4059 e-mail: fwrs~mail.fws.gov Fees for plans vary depending on the number of pages.
    [Show full text]