DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY G6Z 12 C O-oZ Report No. 77094MOZ Public Disclosure Authorized STAFF APPRAISALREPORT MOZAMBIQUE Public Disclosure Authorized BEIRA TRANSPORTCORRIDOR PROJECT JULY 18, 1989 Public Disclosure Authorized SouthernAfrica Department Public Disclosure Authorized InfrastructureOperations Division Thisdocument has a restricted disribution and may be used by recipients only in theperformance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS Currency Unit - Metical (plural Meticais) USS1 * 715 Meticais (Mts) 05/01189 Mt 100 - US$0.14 MEASURES AND EQUIVALENTS 1 Meter (m) - 3.28 Feet 1 Square Meter (m.sq) 10.76 Square Feet 1 Hectare 2.47 Acres 1 Kilometer - 0.62 Miles ABBREVIATIONSAND ACRONYMS AfDB = African DevelopmentBank BCA - Beira Corridor Authority BTC - Beira Transport Corridor CFM(C) - Caminhos de Ferro de Mocambique (Centro) CFM(N) ' Caminhos de Ferro de Mozambique (Norte) CFM(S) ' Caminhos de Ferro de Mocambique (Sul) CFM,EE Caminhos de Ferro de Mocambique, Empresa Estatal CPMZ - CompanhiaPipeline Mozambique-Zimbabwe DANIDA = Danish InternationalDevelopment Authority DNPCF 8 Direccao Nacional de Portos e Caminhos de Ferro EDF - European DevelopmentFund EEC European Economic Community GDR 3 German DemocraticRepublic MBA - MachipandaBeira Authority (Zimbabwe) MIS = ManagementInformation System MT ' Metric Ton (1,000kg) MTC = Ministry of Transport and Communications NORAD 3 NorwegianDirectorate for DevelopmentAid NRZ = National Railways of Zimbabwe RENFE = Red Nacional de los FerrocarrilesEspanoles RITES 2 Rail India Technical and Economic Services RSA Republic of South Africa SADCC = SouthernAfrica DevelopmentCoordination Conferenc; SATCC = SouthernAfrica Transport and Communications Commission SETEP 3 Secretariateof State for Technical and Vocational Training UEM = University EduardoMondlane U.K.ODA = United Kingdom Overseas DevelopmentAdministration USAID = United States Agency for InternationalDevelopment WFP World Food Program uaR rriLiAL USE ONLY MOZAMBIQUE BEIRA TRANSPORTCORRIDOR PROJECT TABLEOF CONTENTS Page No. CREDIT AND PROJECT SUMMARY................. ... ............. i - ii I. SECTORAL AND SOUTHERN AFRICA REGIONAL CONTEXT.......... 1 A. Introduction......................... .. ....... 1 B. GeographicSetting ............... ............ 1 C. Role of Transport Corridorsin Mozambique'sEconomy 2 D. Southern Africa Regional Coe t e xt 3 E. GovernmentStrategyr........... *.......... 6... 5 F. IDA's Role...... 8 II. THE BEIRA TRANSPORTCORRIDOR............... 9 A. Physical and InstitutionalFramework . .. 9 B. Beira Portort.... ..... ..... .... ... 10 C. Beira-MachipandaRailwaya....... ..... 13 D. Beira Machipanda R oad . ................ 15 E. Pipeline Beira-Mutare ..... .......... 15 F. Tranna....................... 15 III. THE PROJECT R.. ... ........... .... 16 A. Project Objectives ......... .16 B. The Beira CorridorAuthority... 17 C. The Beira Corridor Program... 17 D. Overall Program Cost and Financing. 19 E. IDA Assisted Project Components.......... 21 F. Rationale for IDA Components... 27 G. Project Cost Estimates ..... 27 H. Financing ............. 28 I. Implementationn... .... .... 29 J. Procurement .... 29 K. Disbursements .... 30 L. Project Monitoring ... 31 M. Budget, Accounts,Audit and Evaluation .... 31 N. Enviroment .... 32 This report is based on the findings of an appraisalmission to Mozambique in October November, 1988 consistingof World Bank staff Messrs D. Graham (MissionLeader), J. Rebelo, K. Kohriko and S. Nayak and consultants Messrs. Bonnin, Le Bussy, Gusmao, de Langen, Morra and Spit. Mrs. L. Iacono was responsiblefor report processing. This document has a restricteddistribution and may be used by recipients only in the perfomrance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. Table of Contents (Cont'd) IV. ECONOMIC EVALUATION ...................... .. 32 As Introduction*... ........................*s..*.........32 B. Traffic Forecast................................. 32 C. Economic Evaluation..... ....... .. ....... .* 38 V. FINANCIALEVALUATION ......................... so...... 41 A. CFMC F....................... 41 B. DNPCF....... #o , ....,.. o ..... o 44 VI. AGREEMENTS,CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............ 44 ANNEXES 1 Status of Overall Project Components 2 Training 3 TechnicalAssistance 4 LocomotiveRequirements 5 PerformanceTargets 6 Economic Analysis 7 Financial Analysis 8 Organization Charts 9 Criteria for Investment in the Beira Corridor 10 Terms of Reference for the Project Coordinator and Procurement/DisbursementOfficer MAPS IBRD No. 20101 Beira Corridor IBRD No. 20102 Beira Corridor IBRD No. 21356 Beira Port MOZAMBIQUE BEIRA TRANSPORTCORRIDOR PROJECT CREDIT AND PROJECT SUMMARY Borrowers People's Republic of Mozambique Beneficiaries: Ministry of Transportand Communications(MTC), National Directorateof Ports and Railways (DNPCF),Beira Corridor Authority (BCA), Central Railway System (CFM(C)),Southern Railway System (CFM(S)),Northern Railway System (CFM(N)and Secretariateof State for Technical and Vocational Training (SETEP). Amounts SDR 31 million (US$ 40.0 million equivalent). Termst Standard IDA Terms with 40 years maturity. Onlendini Terms: The credit will be on-lent to the Mozambique Ports and Railways Administration(DNPCF) for a period of 30 years includingfive years of grace, at an interest rate of 7.65%. DNPCF will bear the foreign exchange risk. Project's Descriptions The main objectiveof the Beira Transport Corridor Program is the rehabilitationand upgrading of the Beira Corridor to restore its cost efficienttransit functions. The IDA assisted projectwould contributeto this objective through the provisionof technical assistance,manpower developmentand training and motive power. IDA componentswill provide for (i) technical assistanceto run port and railway operationsduring the 1989-1995period; (ii) manpower developmentand training for all levels of staff in the port and railways; (iii) rehabilitationand acquisitionof motive power for main line and shunting operations;and (iv) implementationof a railway/portcost accountingsystem and a management informationsystem. Benefits and Risks: The main benefits are the reductionof transportcosts and increasedefficiency which will allow Beira to competewith Durban (RSA), providingZimbabwe and Malawi with cheaper alternativesto the sea and Mozambiquewith foreign exchange earnings. The main risks are (i) delays in project implementationand consequent inabilityto provide acceptablelevels of service may affect financial and economicviability; and (ii) the security issue: in spite of the presence of armed forces guarding the corridor,possible disruptionsmay occur. EstimatedCosts: Local Foreign Total -US$ Million------------- General Projects 3.7 22.1 25.8 Port Projects 6.4 187.4 193.8 Rail Projects 3.4 94.6 98.0 Road Projects 5.0 22.3 27.3 Total 18.5 326.4 344.9 FinancingPlan: Local Foreign Total ---------- US$ Million------------ Mozambique Government 4.3 - 4.3 Proposed IDA Credit 40.0 40.0 Parallel financing _ 29.5 29.5 Sub-totalProject 4.3 69.5 73.8 Other Parallel financing of the Program 14.2 256.9 271.1 Total 18.5 326.4 344.9 EstimatedDisbursements FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 Annual 4.0 12.0 10.0 6.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 Cumulative 4.0 16.0 26.0 32.0 37.0 39.0 40.0 Economic Rate of Return: 14% for the whole Beira Corridor Program. 34% for the IDA assisted Project AF6IN July 1989 MOZAMBIQUE BEIRA TRANSPORTCORRIDOR PROJECT DocumentsAvailable on the Proiect File Report and Documentson Beira TransportCorridor 1. Beira Port Transport System, 10-YearDevelopment Plan, SATCC (SouthernAfrica Transportand CommunicationCommission, Maputo, January 1986). 2. Comments and suggestionson: Beira Port Transport System, 10-Year DevelopmentPlan, World Bank, March 7, 1986. 3. Port of Beira, Pre-FeasibilityStudy of Channel Improvements, Volumes 1, 2 and 3, Bertlin and Partners,June 1978. 4. Beira Port Study, Phase 3, Master Plan Study, Volumes 2, 3, and 4, NEDECO, 1982. 5. Beira Port Project, Tender Documents,Reconstruction of Quays 2-5, Volume 1-6, NEDECO, March 1985. 6. Zimbabwe National Transport Study, SWECO, 1985. 7. Beira-MachipandaRoad, FeasibilityStudy Report, Gavan McDonel and Company with Snowy Mountains EngineeringCorporation and COTOP, Mozambique,April 1985. 8. RehabilitationStudy Beira-MachipandaLine and Maputo- ChicualalcualaLine, Mott, Hay & Anderson InternationalLtd., June 1982/April1983. 9. Study of Railway Rolling Stock in the SADCC countries,Kampsax, Swedrail, June 1984. 10. Mozambique,An IntroductoryEconomic Survey, Annex II, Transport Sector, World Bank, June 6, 1985. 11. SouthernAfrica Regional TransportationStrategy Paper, Louis Berger InternationalInc., for USAID, March 15, 1985. 12. SouthernAfrica Regional TransportationStrategy Evaluation,Data Base Update, Louis Berger International,Inc., for USAID, May 1986. MOZAMBIQUE BEIRA TRANSPORTCORRIDOR PROJECT 13. Port Staff Training Program Study, SATCC, Norconsult,September 1986. 14. Reconstruction Quays 2-5, Beira, Economic and Financial Feasibility,Netherlands Economic Institute,October 1986. 15. SATCC Project #R-OP-1, Motive Power, Rolling Stock an; Operations Plan for CFM Center, Draft Final Report, 2 volumes, SLI Consultants,October 1986. 16. Study on Railway Training Programs,DE Consult, October 1986. 17. Study of Locomotivesfor DNPCF, Mozambique. Rites, September 1988. 18. Organizationand Manpower DevelopmentPlan,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Development Corridors and Spatial Development Initiatives – Some Current Perspectives on Potentials and Progress
    REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORRIDORS AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES – SOME CURRENT PERSPECTIVES ON POTENTIALS AND PROGRESS GRM de Beer 1. Introduction This paper has been prepared for the South African Transport Conference. The purpose of the paper is to provide a brief overview of development prospects, projects and progress in respect of selected regional development corridors in southern Africa1. The various development corridor initiatives need to be viewed against the backdrop of a number of socio-economic imperatives that are facing the SADC member states2. They include the following: • The need to increase the rate of economic growth in the region. • The need to develop the regional economy in a manner that would render it far more diversified, stronger, and internationally competitive. • The need to significantly speed up the rate of employment creation, both formal and informal. Related to this is the need to create jobs that are sustainable in the long term. • The need to create viable business opportunities for small and medium scale entrepreneurs (SMEs). (Particularly in context of the formal sectors increasing inability to generate permanent jobs.) • The need to identify policies and strategies, and support projects and programmes, which will provide a sustainable basis for empowering local communities. • The need to derive sustainable strategies and programmes to facilitate the rehabilitation and expansion of the region’s infrastructure networks and facilities, and also to improve on the quality and reliability of the logistical services provided in terms of such infrastructure and facilities. • The need to mobilise/secure far greater levels of private sector investment and lending in support of the broader socio-economic development process.
    [Show full text]
  • LTPF Chapter 7 Africa Transport Infrastructure Planning.Pdf
    CHAPTER 7 AFRICA TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AFRICA TABLE OF TRANSPORT CONTENTS INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AFRICA TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING 1. INTRODUCTION 419 2. OVERVIEW OF DEMAND 419 2.1 TOTAL FREIGHT SURFACE FLOWS (SADC COUNTRIES) 419 2.1.1 SOUTH AFRICA CROSS BORDER TRAFFIC (TRANSNET TRANSPORTATION MODEL) 419 2.1.2 SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA TOTAL ROAD AND RAIL FLOWS 421 2.1.3 CRUDE OIL PIPELINE FLOWS 429 2.2 PORTS (ALL MAJOR AFRICAN PORTS) 432 2. OVERVIEW OF CONDITION AND CAPACITY STATUS QUO 434 2.1 RAIL 434 2.2 PORTS 439 2.3 PIPELINES 442 3. OVERVIEW OF REGIONAL CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES 444 3.1 KEY ISSUES AND TRENDS HAMPERING DEVELOPMENT 444 3.2 LESSONS LEARNED 445 3.3 OVERVIEW OF SADC CORRIDORS 446 3.3.1 SALIENT ISSUES NEGATIVELY IMPACTING ON CORRIDOR OPERATIONS 454 3.4 CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENTS AND PLANS 455 3.4 FORECASTED REGIONAL DEMAND 457 3.6 STRATEGIC RAIL PROJECTS 458 3.7 FOCUS AREAS 459 3.8 STRATEGIC PORT PROJECTS 470 3.9 MAJOR PORT PROJECTS 471 3.10 STRATEGIC PIPELINE PROJECTS 475 3.11 MAJOR PIPELINE PROJECTS 476 4. TRANSNET STRATEGIES AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS 477 4.1 STRATEGY 477 Please note this Long-Term Framework Plan is not a business or operational plan, and is unconstrained to capital planning and independent to other more detailed Transnet business and operating division (OD) plans. The LTPF is only a planning tool, to guide Transnet and all external and public stakeholders. The LTPF is published annually at www.transnet.net. Transnet SOC Ltd © LTPF 2016 417 AFRICA ACRONYMS TRANSPORT AND ABBREVIATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • 6. LTPF 2017 Africa
    Transnet SOC Ltd © LTPF 2017 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIAIONS AfDB African Development Bank AICD Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic ARTIN African Regional Transport Infrastructure Network AUC African Union Commission Bbl/d Billion barrels per day (oil) BBR Beitbridge Bulawayo Railways BR Botswana Railways bcm Billion cubic metres per year CCFB Companhia Dos Caminhos De Ferro Da Beira CDN Railway Systems of Northern Mozambique (Corredor de Desenvolvimento do Norte) CEAR Central East African Railways CFB Lobito - Benguela Railways (Caminhos de Ferro de Benguela) CFL Luanda Railways (Caminhos de Ferror de Luanda) CFMa Namibe Railways (Caminhos de Ferror de Namibe) CFM Railways and Ports of Mozambique (Portos e Caminhos de Ferro de Mozambique) CFM-CENTRA L The Beira Railroad CFMK Chemin de Fer Matadi-Kinshasa CFM-NORTH The Nacala Corridor (Also see CDN) CFM-SOUTH The Maputo Railroad CFN Moçãmedes Railways (Caminhos de Ferro Namibe) CPCS CPCS Transcom International Limited CPMZ Companhia Pipeline Moçambique - Zimbabwe DRC Democratic Republic of the Congo GDP Growth Domestic Product LCA Logistics Capacity Assessment mscfd Million standard cubic foot per day (measure of gas flow) mtpa Million ton per annum NOCZIM National Oil Company of Zimbabwe NPCA NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency NRZ National Railways of Zimbabwe PAP Planned action plan PIDA Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa RSZ Railway Systems of Zambia SADC Southern African Development Community scf Standard cubic foot (a measure of quantity of gas) SETRAG Societe d’Exploitation du Transgabonais SNCC Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer du Congo SR Swaziland Railways TAZAMA Tanzania Zambia Mafuta Pipeline TAZARA Tanzania and Zambia Railway Authority Tcf Trillion cubic feet TMSA Trademark SA UNCTAD United Nations conference on trade and development ZRL Zambian Railways Limited Transnet SOC Ltd © LTPF 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Development Directions for Regional Infrastructure
    Preparatory Survey for Southern Africa Integrated Transport Program Chapter 4 4 Development Directions for Regional Infrastructure 4.1 Infrastructure Bottlenecks under Growth Scenarios 4.1.1 Current Industrial Situation of the Corridors In parallel with the macro analysis undertaken in Chapter 2, summary information on development potential in the region (especially of mineral resources development accompanied by cross-border transport improvements and an overview of a Mega Project) are presented in this section. More details may be found in Appendix B. The results serve as input to Section 4.1.3 on Infrastructure Bottlenecks under the Growth Scenarios. The figure below visually summarizes the mineral and agricultural potential in the Southern African region. (The number of corridor in Figure 4.1.1 corresponds to this section’s paragraph number.) Figure 4.1.1 Mineral and Agricultural Resources and Corridors (1) Nacala Corridor Nacala is regarded as the best location for a deepwater port on the East African coast. The Nacala Corridor has consequently been at the forefront of ongoing initiatives to rehabilitate the rail link to Malawi, thereby creating a number of “anchor” tenants and promoting development 4-1 Preparatory Survey for Southern Africa Integrated Transport Program Chapter 4 along the corridor. Together with Beira and other corridors (Sena and Tete), these developments have been linked to the possible export of coal from the Moatize and Benga coal fields as well as from the Muchana Vuzi coal fields north of the Cahorra Bassa Dam in Tete Province, Mozambique. The corridor is ultimately seen as linking Lusaka in Zambia with the Port of Nacala.
    [Show full text]
  • Managerial Decisions with Computers in National Directorate of the Merchant Marine in Mozambique
    World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations 1989 Managerial decisions with computers in national directorate of the merchant marine in Mozambique Boaventura Marcelino Cherinda WMU Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Cherinda, Boaventura Marcelino, "Managerial decisions with computers in national directorate of the merchant marine in Mozambique" (1989). World Maritime University Dissertations. 846. https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/846 This Dissertation is brought to you courtesy of Maritime Commons. Open Access items may be downloaded for non- commercial, fair use academic purposes. No items may be hosted on another server or web site without express written permission from the World Maritime University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WMU LIBRARY | WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY- MALMO. SWEDEN MANAGERIAL DECISIONS WITH COMPUTERS IN NATIONAL DIRECTORATE OF THE MERCHANT MARINE IN MOZAMEaQUE bv Boavent.ur a Mar c elino Cher i nda MOZAMBIQUE A oapar submitted to the Faculty o-f the World Maritime University in partial satisfaction of the reaui rements tor the awa^rd o-f a MASTER OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN oi; NERAL MARITIME ADMINISTRATION The contents of this oaper retlect rny personal views and are not necessarily endorsed bv the University. Supervised bv ; Siqnature Professor J.Mlynarczyk» World Maritime University Assessed by: Hans van Walen Lecturer WMU Co-assessed by; Aape Os V i sitin a Pr of essor World Maritime University * 5^ * * .t: >i£ iK * * * * S He *•*•*■**** sK ii': * ^ * ^ *:****** ^: !i: )f« ^ sK t * * 1111 t >|c t t t t t ^1' t )k \i/ 'i: >k $ t $ j{< >f; * * t TD DALY A Ai\iD LITO * t t il-: * * 5K t t t * ;!c t t t t t t t t t >S< ^ ;ic # * !jo|c A S: ^ >|c f !fe 5K S :j£ # # ;!f !f' f 5k A !|i $ ii 5k A A A A A A A A * A A A A A ^ A- A' A A A A TABLE OF CONTENTS PAG.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS in SOUTHERN AFRICA: Issues, Actions and Constraints
    Distr. GENERAL UNCTAD/LDC/93 6 September 1994 Original: ENGLISH ENGLISH/FRENCH ONLY UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT TRANSIT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA: Issues, actions and constraints Report prepared by Mr. S. Simuyemba UNCTAD consultant* * The views expressed in this study are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNCTAD secretariat or of any official administration. The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. GE.94-53602 (E) -2- CONTENTS Paragraphs Part One Overview....................... 1-84 Introduction.................... 1- 2 I. Transit corridors ................. 3- 6 II. Transit Countries and Port Facilities ....... 7- 15 III. Resource mobilization ............... 16- 19 IV. Subregional Institutional Framework for Transit Transport ................. 20- 21 V. Reorientation of transit policies ......... 22- 25 VI. Regional efforts towards harmonization of transit policies and practices........... 26- 70 A. General .................... 26 B. Institutional limitations ........... 27- 29 C. Regional standards............... 30- 31 D. Transit measures in place ........... 32- 58 E. Planned measures................ 59- 70 VII. Management of transit systems ........... 71- 77 VIII. Conclusion....................
    [Show full text]