Regional Development Corridors and Spatial Development Initiatives – Some Current Perspectives on Potentials and Progress

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Development Corridors and Spatial Development Initiatives – Some Current Perspectives on Potentials and Progress REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORRIDORS AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES – SOME CURRENT PERSPECTIVES ON POTENTIALS AND PROGRESS GRM de Beer 1. Introduction This paper has been prepared for the South African Transport Conference. The purpose of the paper is to provide a brief overview of development prospects, projects and progress in respect of selected regional development corridors in southern Africa1. The various development corridor initiatives need to be viewed against the backdrop of a number of socio-economic imperatives that are facing the SADC member states2. They include the following: • The need to increase the rate of economic growth in the region. • The need to develop the regional economy in a manner that would render it far more diversified, stronger, and internationally competitive. • The need to significantly speed up the rate of employment creation, both formal and informal. Related to this is the need to create jobs that are sustainable in the long term. • The need to create viable business opportunities for small and medium scale entrepreneurs (SMEs). (Particularly in context of the formal sectors increasing inability to generate permanent jobs.) • The need to identify policies and strategies, and support projects and programmes, which will provide a sustainable basis for empowering local communities. • The need to derive sustainable strategies and programmes to facilitate the rehabilitation and expansion of the region’s infrastructure networks and facilities, and also to improve on the quality and reliability of the logistical services provided in terms of such infrastructure and facilities. • The need to mobilise/secure far greater levels of private sector investment and lending in support of the broader socio-economic development process. 1 The focus of this paper has, in context of this particular conference, been placed on the regional development corridors/SDIs that are underpinned to a significant degree by transportation development. 2 The Southern African Development Community (SADC) is an economic grouping of fourteen countries, namely, Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. The primary objective of the SADC alliance is to promote economic growth and development, to alleviate poverty, enhance the standard and quality of life of the peoples of Southern Africa and support for the socially disadvantaged through regional integration. 20th South African Transport Conference South Africa, 16 – 20 July 2001 ‘Meeting the Transport Challenges in Southern Africa’ Organised by: Conference Planners Conference Papers Produced by: Document Transformation Technologies • The need to develop an integrated and coherent framework and strategy within which private and public sector, as well as donor support can be successfully mobilised to support economic reform and socio-economic development. • The need to develop efficient and effective planning and decision-making processes in support of macro-economic growth and socio-economic development at national and regional level. It is within the context of the above mentioned issues (the list is by no means comprehensive), that the rehabilitation of the regional transport corridors, and the further development of these transport corridors into diverse multi-sectoral development corridors based on the principles and strategies applied in Spatial Development Initiatives (SDI) programme has become a very high strategic development priority. The successful implementation of the Maputo Development Corridor had the effect of boosting support within SADC for the concept of multi-sectoral economic development corridors and for the particular planning and investor mobilisation approach embodied in the SDIs. This paper, takes a brief look at the background issues and trends that underpin the development corridor initiatives in Southern Africa, and the key principles and strategies that are fundamental to the SDI approach. The paper also provides a brief overview of selected regional development corridors where the transportation infrastructure networks are a key component. In this overview the emphasis is placed on highlighting some of the main economic and infrastructure development projects that are currently being considered as the ‘anchor projects’, as well as commenting on the degree of progress being achieved. In the final part of the paper, an assessment is made of some of the key observations and issues arising from the various development corridor initiatives, and where appropriate certain proposals in support of these initiatives are put forward. 2. SADC economic priorities The economic vision of SADC is to transform the fourteen countries of Southern Africa from operating as individual fragmented markets into a single integrated vibrant and globally competitive market characterised by free movement of goods, services, capital and labour. To translate this vision into reality, the SADC countries have negotiated, amongst other things, a series of “Protocols” or legally binding regional agreements that define the framework and mechanisms for achieving such integration3. The SADC Member States support the principle and strategy of closer economic cooperation as a means of promoting economic development within the context of the global economy. In this regard there are a number of perceived socio-economic development opportunities and benefits. Amongst the main key economic development opportunities that would arise from regional integration are the following: Firstly, the diversification of the regions industrial base based 3 Two of the key Protocols are the Protocol on Trade and the Protocol on Transport, Communications and Meteorology (Protocol on TCM). In terms of the latter protocol, the vision for infrastructure development in Southern Africa is to create a seamless, integrated, efficient, cost-effective and responsive transport and communications system that is characterised by partnership between the public and private sectors and that acts as a catalyst for (as well as accelerates) the goal of socio- economic growth and integration for the region. on each countries inherent development potential and related comparative advantages4. Secondly, regional industrial specialisation, and particularly specialised regional processing activities (that can take place as a result of the larger regional market)5. Thirdly, a regional approach to the mobilisation of FDI. Foreign direct investment is more likely to be attracted to the region within the context of larger markets, and an economic policy and strategy framework that is regionally integrated and collaborative. Fourthly, the sharing of the regions training and capacity building skills for the wider benefit of the southern African members. The key economic benefits that are to be derived for the SADC Member States from a regionally cooperative and integrated approach are seen to include enhanced scale economies; the promotion of competition and innovation at a regional level; providing a stimulus to investment and productivity; the institutionalisation of conflict management; and enhanced bargaining in international fora. Further benefits include a reduced dependence on primary product exports; as well as scale gains from implementation of large regional projects; reduced economic disparities and inequities among Southern African countries; and improved economic management and performance through regional cooperation. 3. From regional transport corridors to regional development corridors If one looks back at the original set of objectives of the Maputo Development Corridor initiative it is evident that from the outset the strategists promoting the initiative were not solely concerned with the re-establishment of the historical transport corridor. Whilst the initial infrastructure anchor projects were strategically vital in their own right, they had further strategic importance because of their ability to support the broader socio-economic development process. One of the key achievements of initiatives like the Maputo Development Corridor was the impact it achieved in assisting/facilitating the development of new, or expansion of existing economic opportunities, and as such supporting the establishment of a development corridor. 4. The SDI approach – key principles and strategies. There are a number of key principles that underpin the SDI approach, and it is the application of these principles that appears to have been largely responsible for the level of success achieved with the programme. Co-operation, collaboration and integration in terms of economic policy and strategy. Prior to the political changes in South Africa, the rest of the region had not been able to design and implement collaborative and integrated economic policies and strategies that included South Africa. On the contrary, South Africa’s ‘pariah’ status had the effect of forcing the South African economy to be managed as a closed economy (i.e. import 4 The lack of diversified industrial development in the southern African countries has been a key impediment to enhanced regional trade. Opportunities for the development of value added production is particularly important. Such processed products fetch higher prices in the markets, and are less vulnerable to the price instabilities that effect primary commodities. The potential for regional integration will remain limited as long as economies are dependent on a limited
Recommended publications
  • LTPF Chapter 7 Africa Transport Infrastructure Planning.Pdf
    CHAPTER 7 AFRICA TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AFRICA TABLE OF TRANSPORT CONTENTS INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AFRICA TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING 1. INTRODUCTION 419 2. OVERVIEW OF DEMAND 419 2.1 TOTAL FREIGHT SURFACE FLOWS (SADC COUNTRIES) 419 2.1.1 SOUTH AFRICA CROSS BORDER TRAFFIC (TRANSNET TRANSPORTATION MODEL) 419 2.1.2 SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA TOTAL ROAD AND RAIL FLOWS 421 2.1.3 CRUDE OIL PIPELINE FLOWS 429 2.2 PORTS (ALL MAJOR AFRICAN PORTS) 432 2. OVERVIEW OF CONDITION AND CAPACITY STATUS QUO 434 2.1 RAIL 434 2.2 PORTS 439 2.3 PIPELINES 442 3. OVERVIEW OF REGIONAL CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES 444 3.1 KEY ISSUES AND TRENDS HAMPERING DEVELOPMENT 444 3.2 LESSONS LEARNED 445 3.3 OVERVIEW OF SADC CORRIDORS 446 3.3.1 SALIENT ISSUES NEGATIVELY IMPACTING ON CORRIDOR OPERATIONS 454 3.4 CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENTS AND PLANS 455 3.4 FORECASTED REGIONAL DEMAND 457 3.6 STRATEGIC RAIL PROJECTS 458 3.7 FOCUS AREAS 459 3.8 STRATEGIC PORT PROJECTS 470 3.9 MAJOR PORT PROJECTS 471 3.10 STRATEGIC PIPELINE PROJECTS 475 3.11 MAJOR PIPELINE PROJECTS 476 4. TRANSNET STRATEGIES AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS 477 4.1 STRATEGY 477 Please note this Long-Term Framework Plan is not a business or operational plan, and is unconstrained to capital planning and independent to other more detailed Transnet business and operating division (OD) plans. The LTPF is only a planning tool, to guide Transnet and all external and public stakeholders. The LTPF is published annually at www.transnet.net. Transnet SOC Ltd © LTPF 2016 417 AFRICA ACRONYMS TRANSPORT AND ABBREVIATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • 6. LTPF 2017 Africa
    Transnet SOC Ltd © LTPF 2017 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIAIONS AfDB African Development Bank AICD Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic ARTIN African Regional Transport Infrastructure Network AUC African Union Commission Bbl/d Billion barrels per day (oil) BBR Beitbridge Bulawayo Railways BR Botswana Railways bcm Billion cubic metres per year CCFB Companhia Dos Caminhos De Ferro Da Beira CDN Railway Systems of Northern Mozambique (Corredor de Desenvolvimento do Norte) CEAR Central East African Railways CFB Lobito - Benguela Railways (Caminhos de Ferro de Benguela) CFL Luanda Railways (Caminhos de Ferror de Luanda) CFMa Namibe Railways (Caminhos de Ferror de Namibe) CFM Railways and Ports of Mozambique (Portos e Caminhos de Ferro de Mozambique) CFM-CENTRA L The Beira Railroad CFMK Chemin de Fer Matadi-Kinshasa CFM-NORTH The Nacala Corridor (Also see CDN) CFM-SOUTH The Maputo Railroad CFN Moçãmedes Railways (Caminhos de Ferro Namibe) CPCS CPCS Transcom International Limited CPMZ Companhia Pipeline Moçambique - Zimbabwe DRC Democratic Republic of the Congo GDP Growth Domestic Product LCA Logistics Capacity Assessment mscfd Million standard cubic foot per day (measure of gas flow) mtpa Million ton per annum NOCZIM National Oil Company of Zimbabwe NPCA NEPAD Planning and Coordinating Agency NRZ National Railways of Zimbabwe PAP Planned action plan PIDA Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa RSZ Railway Systems of Zambia SADC Southern African Development Community scf Standard cubic foot (a measure of quantity of gas) SETRAG Societe d’Exploitation du Transgabonais SNCC Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer du Congo SR Swaziland Railways TAZAMA Tanzania Zambia Mafuta Pipeline TAZARA Tanzania and Zambia Railway Authority Tcf Trillion cubic feet TMSA Trademark SA UNCTAD United Nations conference on trade and development ZRL Zambian Railways Limited Transnet SOC Ltd © LTPF 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Development Directions for Regional Infrastructure
    Preparatory Survey for Southern Africa Integrated Transport Program Chapter 4 4 Development Directions for Regional Infrastructure 4.1 Infrastructure Bottlenecks under Growth Scenarios 4.1.1 Current Industrial Situation of the Corridors In parallel with the macro analysis undertaken in Chapter 2, summary information on development potential in the region (especially of mineral resources development accompanied by cross-border transport improvements and an overview of a Mega Project) are presented in this section. More details may be found in Appendix B. The results serve as input to Section 4.1.3 on Infrastructure Bottlenecks under the Growth Scenarios. The figure below visually summarizes the mineral and agricultural potential in the Southern African region. (The number of corridor in Figure 4.1.1 corresponds to this section’s paragraph number.) Figure 4.1.1 Mineral and Agricultural Resources and Corridors (1) Nacala Corridor Nacala is regarded as the best location for a deepwater port on the East African coast. The Nacala Corridor has consequently been at the forefront of ongoing initiatives to rehabilitate the rail link to Malawi, thereby creating a number of “anchor” tenants and promoting development 4-1 Preparatory Survey for Southern Africa Integrated Transport Program Chapter 4 along the corridor. Together with Beira and other corridors (Sena and Tete), these developments have been linked to the possible export of coal from the Moatize and Benga coal fields as well as from the Muchana Vuzi coal fields north of the Cahorra Bassa Dam in Tete Province, Mozambique. The corridor is ultimately seen as linking Lusaka in Zambia with the Port of Nacala.
    [Show full text]
  • Managerial Decisions with Computers in National Directorate of the Merchant Marine in Mozambique
    World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations 1989 Managerial decisions with computers in national directorate of the merchant marine in Mozambique Boaventura Marcelino Cherinda WMU Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Cherinda, Boaventura Marcelino, "Managerial decisions with computers in national directorate of the merchant marine in Mozambique" (1989). World Maritime University Dissertations. 846. https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/846 This Dissertation is brought to you courtesy of Maritime Commons. Open Access items may be downloaded for non- commercial, fair use academic purposes. No items may be hosted on another server or web site without express written permission from the World Maritime University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WMU LIBRARY | WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY- MALMO. SWEDEN MANAGERIAL DECISIONS WITH COMPUTERS IN NATIONAL DIRECTORATE OF THE MERCHANT MARINE IN MOZAMEaQUE bv Boavent.ur a Mar c elino Cher i nda MOZAMBIQUE A oapar submitted to the Faculty o-f the World Maritime University in partial satisfaction of the reaui rements tor the awa^rd o-f a MASTER OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN oi; NERAL MARITIME ADMINISTRATION The contents of this oaper retlect rny personal views and are not necessarily endorsed bv the University. Supervised bv ; Siqnature Professor J.Mlynarczyk» World Maritime University Assessed by: Hans van Walen Lecturer WMU Co-assessed by; Aape Os V i sitin a Pr of essor World Maritime University * 5^ * * .t: >i£ iK * * * * S He *•*•*■**** sK ii': * ^ * ^ *:****** ^: !i: )f« ^ sK t * * 1111 t >|c t t t t t ^1' t )k \i/ 'i: >k $ t $ j{< >f; * * t TD DALY A Ai\iD LITO * t t il-: * * 5K t t t * ;!c t t t t t t t t t >S< ^ ;ic # * !jo|c A S: ^ >|c f !fe 5K S :j£ # # ;!f !f' f 5k A !|i $ ii 5k A A A A A A A A * A A A A A ^ A- A' A A A A TABLE OF CONTENTS PAG.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY G6Z 12 C O-oZ Report No. 77094MOZ Public Disclosure Authorized STAFF APPRAISALREPORT MOZAMBIQUE Public Disclosure Authorized BEIRA TRANSPORTCORRIDOR PROJECT JULY 18, 1989 Public Disclosure Authorized SouthernAfrica Department Public Disclosure Authorized InfrastructureOperations Division Thisdocument has a restricted disribution and may be used by recipients only in theperformance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS Currency Unit - Metical (plural Meticais) USS1 * 715 Meticais (Mts) 05/01189 Mt 100 - US$0.14 MEASURES AND EQUIVALENTS 1 Meter (m) - 3.28 Feet 1 Square Meter (m.sq) 10.76 Square Feet 1 Hectare 2.47 Acres 1 Kilometer - 0.62 Miles ABBREVIATIONSAND ACRONYMS AfDB = African DevelopmentBank BCA - Beira Corridor Authority BTC - Beira Transport Corridor CFM(C) - Caminhos de Ferro de Mocambique (Centro) CFM(N) ' Caminhos de Ferro de Mozambique (Norte) CFM(S) ' Caminhos de Ferro de Mocambique (Sul) CFM,EE Caminhos de Ferro de Mocambique, Empresa Estatal CPMZ - CompanhiaPipeline Mozambique-Zimbabwe DANIDA = Danish InternationalDevelopment Authority DNPCF 8 Direccao Nacional de Portos e Caminhos de Ferro EDF - European DevelopmentFund EEC European Economic Community GDR 3 German DemocraticRepublic MBA - MachipandaBeira Authority (Zimbabwe) MIS = ManagementInformation System MT ' Metric Ton (1,000kg) MTC = Ministry of Transport and Communications NORAD 3 NorwegianDirectorate for DevelopmentAid NRZ = National
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS in SOUTHERN AFRICA: Issues, Actions and Constraints
    Distr. GENERAL UNCTAD/LDC/93 6 September 1994 Original: ENGLISH ENGLISH/FRENCH ONLY UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT TRANSIT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA: Issues, actions and constraints Report prepared by Mr. S. Simuyemba UNCTAD consultant* * The views expressed in this study are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNCTAD secretariat or of any official administration. The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. GE.94-53602 (E) -2- CONTENTS Paragraphs Part One Overview....................... 1-84 Introduction.................... 1- 2 I. Transit corridors ................. 3- 6 II. Transit Countries and Port Facilities ....... 7- 15 III. Resource mobilization ............... 16- 19 IV. Subregional Institutional Framework for Transit Transport ................. 20- 21 V. Reorientation of transit policies ......... 22- 25 VI. Regional efforts towards harmonization of transit policies and practices........... 26- 70 A. General .................... 26 B. Institutional limitations ........... 27- 29 C. Regional standards............... 30- 31 D. Transit measures in place ........... 32- 58 E. Planned measures................ 59- 70 VII. Management of transit systems ........... 71- 77 VIII. Conclusion....................
    [Show full text]