DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on Survey and Diagnosis of Fish Diseases in Europe 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on Survey and Diagnosis of Fish Diseases in Europe 2018 Report on Survey and Diagnosis of Fish Diseases in Europe 2018 DISCLAIMER The EURL for Fish and Crustacean Diseases and the EU Commission have no liability for the accuracy of the information and cannot be held liable for any third-party claims or losses of any damages related to this report. Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................5 Production data from FEAP and FIGIS ..................................................................................................................5 Number of fish farms in Europe .......................................................................................................................6 Health categorization of fish farms ......................................................................................................................6 Outbreaks and severity of listed diseases in Europe ............................................................................................6 Other fish diseases problems in Europe ...............................................................................................................7 Laboratory examinations ......................................................................................................................................7 Reports from the individual European countries .....................................................................................................9 Austria ..................................................................................................................................................................9 Belgium .................................................................................................................................................................9 Bosnia and Herzegovina .......................................................................................................................................9 Bulgaria .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 Croatia ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 Cyprus ................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Czech Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 13 Denmark ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 Estonia ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 Faroe Islands ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 Finland ............................................................................................................................................................... 18 France ................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Germany ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 Greece ............................................................................................................................................................... 26 Hungary ............................................................................................................................................................. 27 Iceland ............................................................................................................................................................... 29 Ireland ................................................................................................................................................................ 29 Italy .................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Latvia ................................................................................................................................................................. 32 Lithuania ............................................................................................................................................................ 33 Malta.................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Norway .............................................................................................................................................................. 34 Page 2 of 82 Report on Survey and Diagnosis of Fish Diseases in Europe 2018 Poland ................................................................................................................................................................ 35 Portugal ............................................................................................................................................................. 37 Map I ..................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Describe the health status for listed fish diseases according to council directive 2006/88/EC, including the perceived status of listed pathogens, and how surveillance is implemented at the national level ..................... 38 Romania ............................................................................................................................................................. 39 Serbia ................................................................................................................................................................. 39 Slovakia .............................................................................................................................................................. 40 Slovenia ............................................................................................................................................................. 42 Spain .................................................................................................................................................................. 43 Sweden .............................................................................................................................................................. 44 Switzerland ........................................................................................................................................................ 44 The Netherlands ................................................................................................................................................ 45 Turkey ................................................................................................................................................................ 45 England and Wales ............................................................................................................................................ 46 Northern Ireland ................................................................................................................................................ 47 Scotland ............................................................................................................................................................. 47 Annex 1: Number of fish Farms ............................................................................................................................. 50 Annex 2: Number of farms placed in the respective categories according to listed diseases .............................. 51 Annex 3: Outbreaks of listed diseases ................................................................................................................... 54 Annex 4: Other Fish diseases problems ................................................................................................................ 58 Annex 4a: Additional information ..................................................................................................................... 61 Germany ........................................................................................................................................................ 61 Italy ................................................................................................................................................................ 62 Scotland ......................................................................................................................................................... 64 Annex 5: Laboratory data ...................................................................................................................................... 65 Number of samples tested for VHSV in Europe in 2018...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHSV): on the Search for Determinants Important for Virulence in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Skall, H. F.; Kurita, J.; Mori, K.; Ito, T. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Olesen, N. J., Skall, H. F., Kurita, J., Mori, K., & Ito, T. (2015). Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 147-147). [O-139] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteome Analysis Reveals a Role of Rainbow Trout Lymphoid Organs During Yersinia Ruckeri Infection Process
    www.nature.com/scientificreports Correction: Author Correction OPEN Proteome analysis reveals a role of rainbow trout lymphoid organs during Yersinia ruckeri infection Received: 14 February 2018 Accepted: 30 August 2018 process Published online: 18 September 2018 Gokhlesh Kumar 1, Karin Hummel2, Katharina Noebauer2, Timothy J. Welch3, Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli2 & Mansour El-Matbouli1 Yersinia ruckeri is the causative agent of enteric redmouth disease in salmonids. Head kidney and spleen are major lymphoid organs of the teleost fsh where antigen presentation and immune defense against microbes take place. We investigated proteome alteration in head kidney and spleen of the rainbow trout following Y. ruckeri strains infection. Organs were analyzed after 3, 9 and 28 days post exposure with a shotgun proteomic approach. GO annotation and protein-protein interaction were predicted using bioinformatic tools. Thirty four proteins from head kidney and 85 proteins from spleen were found to be diferentially expressed in rainbow trout during the Y. ruckeri infection process. These included lysosomal, antioxidant, metalloproteinase, cytoskeleton, tetraspanin, cathepsin B and c-type lectin receptor proteins. The fndings of this study regarding the immune response at the protein level ofer new insight into the systemic response to Y. ruckeri infection in rainbow trout. This proteomic data facilitate a better understanding of host-pathogen interactions and response of fsh against Y. ruckeri biotype 1 and 2 strains. Protein-protein interaction analysis predicts carbon metabolism, ribosome and phagosome pathways in spleen of infected fsh, which might be useful in understanding biological processes and further studies in the direction of pathways. Enteric redmouth disease (ERM) causes signifcant economic losses in salmonids worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Dicentrarchus Labrax)
    SCIENTIA MARINA 78(4) December 2014, 493-503, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN-L: 0214-8358 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.03992.02C Fitness difference between cryptic salinity-related phenotypes of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Bruno Guinand 1,2, Nolwenn Quéré 1,2, Frédérique Cerqueira 1,3, Erick Desmarais 1,3, François Bonhomme 1,2 1 Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR 5554 (Université Montpellier 2), cc65, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Station Méditerranéenne de l’Environnement Littoral, 2 Avenue des Chantiers, 34200 Sète, France. 3 LabEx CeMEB (Centre Méditerranéen Environnement Biodiversité), Université Montpellier II, place E. Bataillon, cc63, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Summary: The existence of cryptic salinity-related phenotypes has been hypothesized in the “euryhaline” sea bass (Dicen- trarchus labrax). How differential osmoregulation costs between freshwater and saltwater environments affect fitness and phenotypic variation is misunderstood in this species. During an experiment lasting around five months, we investigated changes in the whole body mass and in the expression of growth-related genes (insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1]; growth hormone receptor [GHR]) in the intestine and the liver of sea bass thriving in sea water (SSW), successfully acclimated to freshwater (SFW), and unsuccessfully acclimated to freshwater (UFW). Albeit non-significant, a trend toward change in body mass was demonstrated among SSW, UFW and SFW fish, suggesting that SSW fish were a mixture of the other phe- notypes. Several mortality peaks were observed during the experiment, with batches of UFW fish showing higher expression in the osmoregulatory intestine due to down-regulation of genes in the liver and significant up-regulation of GHR in the intestine compared with SFW fish.
    [Show full text]
  • D4.3 3 Newsletter 3 Aquatt AQUAEXCEL 2020 Deliverable D4.3 3
    D4.3_3 Newsletter 3 AquaTT AQUAEXCEL 2020 Deliverable D4.3_3 Executive Summary Objectives The objective of the newsletter is to facilitate communication and dissemination of the AQUAEXCEL 2020 project ensuring a widespread awareness to all stakeholders. This third newsletter aims to communicate newest AQUAEXCEL 2020 research advances as well as its Transnational Access (TNA) and training course programme, and to introduce another one of the studied species in AQUAEXCEL 2020 and other information of interest. Rationale: AquaTT designed the newsletter following the brand identity of the project (logo, characterising project colours, etc). Content has been based on activities carried out in the project so far like events and research findings, the TNA programme, one of the aquaculture species and general information of interest. The draft newsletter was sent to all AQUAEXCEL 2020 partners to validate the content of the third newsletter. The final newsletter has been sent out to the project partners, stakeholder database contacts and any other interested individuals. The AQUAEXCEL 2020 project website and the collaborative platform will store the newsletter archive. Main Results: The third AQUAEXCEL 2020 newsletter is 8 pages long and features ‘AQUAEXCEL2020 News and Highlights’ like a success story from the TNA programme of AQUAEXCEL 2020 , new publications and feature promotional articles, as well as past events like the Industry & Research Advisory Panel (IRAP) meeting and upcoming events. Emphasis is on the major components of AQUAEXCEL 2020 , the ‘TNA programme’ including the featured success story, the next Calls for Access and a feature of a partner’s TNA facility, as well as an announcement of the ‘Training Courses’.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature-Driven Proliferation of Tetracapsuloides Bryosalmonae in Bryozoan Hosts Portends Salmonid Declines
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 70: 227–236, 2006 Published June 23 Dis Aquat Org Temperature-driven proliferation of Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae in bryozoan hosts portends salmonid declines S. Tops, W. Lockwood, B. Okamura* School of Biological Sciences, Philip Lyle Research Building, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading RG6 6BX, UK ABSTRACT: Proliferative kidney disease (PKD) is an emerging disease of salmonid fishes. It is pro- voked by temperature and caused by infective spores of the myxozoan parasite Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae, which develops in freshwater bryozoans. We investigated the link between PKD and temperature by determining whether temperature influences the proliferation of T. bryosalmonae in the bryozoan host Fredericella sultana. Herein we show that increased temperatures drive the pro- liferation of T. bryosalmonae in bryozoans by provoking, accelerating and prolonging the production of infective spores from cryptic stages. Based on these results we predict that PKD outbreaks will increase further in magnitude and severity in wild and farmed salmonids as a result of climate-driven enhanced proliferation in invertebrate hosts, and urge for early implementation of management strategies to reduce future salmonid declines. KEY WORDS: Temperature · Climate change · Salmonids · Proliferative kidney disease · Myxozoa · Freshwater bryozoans · Covert infections Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION The source of PKD was obscure until freshwater bryozoans (benthic, colonial invertebrates) were iden- Disease outbreaks in natural and agricultural sys- tified recently as hosts of the causative agent (Ander- tems are increasing in both severity and frequency son et al. 1999), which was described as Tetracapsu- (Daszak et al. 2000, Subasinghe et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Ecology of the Common Cuttlefish (Sepia Officinalis)
    Supporting Sustainable Sepia Stocks Report 1: The biology and ecology of the common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) Daniel Davies Kathryn Nelson Sussex IFCA 2018 Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Biology ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Physical description ............................................................................................................................ 3 Locomotion and respiration ................................................................................................................ 4 Vision ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Chromatophores ................................................................................................................................. 5 Colour patterns ................................................................................................................................... 5 Ink sac and funnel organ
    [Show full text]
  • Acquired Resistance to Kudoa Thyrsites in Atlantic Salmon Salmo Salar Following Recovery from a Primary Infection with the Parasite
    Aquaculture 451 (2016) 457–462 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquaculture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online Acquired resistance to Kudoa thyrsites in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar following recovery from a primary infection with the parasite Simon R.M. Jones ⁎, Steven Cho, Jimmy Nguyen, Amelia Mahony Pacific Biological Station, 3190 Hammond Bay Road, Nanaimo, British Columbia V9T 6N7, Canada article info abstract Article history: The influence of prior infection with Kudoa thyrsites or host size on the susceptibility of Atlantic salmon post- Received 19 August 2015 smolts to infection with the parasite was investigated. Exposure to infective K. thyrsites in raw seawater (RSW) Received in revised form 30 September 2015 was regulated by the use of ultraviolet irradiation (UVSW). Naïve smolts were exposed to RSW for either Accepted 2 October 2015 38 days (440 degree-days, DD) or 82 days (950 DD) after which they were maintained in UVSW. Control fish Available online 9 October 2015 were maintained on UVSW only. Microscopic examination at day 176 (1985 DD) revealed K. thyrsites infection in nearly 90% of exposed fish but not in controls. Prevalence and severity of the infection decreased in later sam- ples. Following a second exposure of all fish at day 415 (4275 DD), prevalence and severity were elevated in the UVSW controls compared to previously exposed fish groups, suggesting the acquisition of protective immunity. In a second experiment, naïve smolts were exposed to RSW at weights of 101 g, 180 g, 210 g or 332 g and the prevalence and severity of K. thyrsites in the smallest fish group were higher than in any other group.
    [Show full text]
  • Largescale Mullet (Planiliza Macrolepis) Can Recover from Thermal Pollution-Induced Malformations
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Largescale mullet (Planiliza macrolepis) can recover from thermal pollution-induced malformations Yi Ta Shao1,2, Shang-Ying Chuang1, Hao-Yi Chang1, Yung-Che Tseng3, Kwang- Tsao Shao1,4* 1 Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, 2 Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, 3 Marine Research Station, Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 4 Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 It is well known in aquaculture that hyperthermic perturbations may cause skeleton malfor- mations in fish, but this phenomenon has rarely been documented in wild species. One rare location where thermal pollution has increased the proportion of malformed fish in OPEN ACCESS wild population is in the waters near the Kuosheng Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan. At this site, the threshold temperature and critical exposure time for inducing deformations have Citation: Shao YT, Chuang S-Y, Chang H-Y, Tseng Y-C, Shao K-T (2018) Largescale mullet (Planiliza not been previously determined. In addition, it was unclear whether juvenile fish with ther- macrolepis) can recover from thermal pollution- mal-induced malformations are able to recover when the temperature returns below the induced malformations. PLoS ONE 13(11): threshold. In the present study, juvenile largescale mullet (Planiliza macrolepis) were kept e0208005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. at temperatures ranging from 26ÊC and 36ÊC for 1±4 weeks, after which malformed fish pone.0208005 were maintained at a preferred temperature of 26ÊC for another 8 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Sweet Home — Trout Parasites
    length of your hand. Some live on a single fi sh, whilst others have complex life cycles with multiple hosts, spanning many years and travelling hundreds of miles before they mature and reproduce. Many parasites lead a benign existence, tolerated by healthy fi sh without causing any obvious distress. However, by their very nature, parasites divert energy from their host for their own survival and reproduction. Consequently, some parasite infections can lead to debilitation of individual fi sh and serious disease problems within populations. Here, Chris Williams and Shaun Leonard give us a brief introduction to some of those parasites and problems. The Fish Louse, Argulus Figure 1: The white, fl uffy fungal The fi sh louse, Argulus, is a resident of rivers infection of Saprolegnia, tends to and lakes and one of the most familiar be a secondary infection on open parasites encountered by anglers. Three abrasions and sores species have been recorded from British freshwater fi sh and all may be found on the skin and fi ns of trout. The largest is Argulus coregoni (Figure 2), a parasite with a preference for running water so most likely to be encountered by the wild trout angler. Home Adults, up to 10mm in size, are light brown and well camoufl aged on the fl anks of trout; the black, beady eyespots can give them away (Figure 3). Suckers allow the parasite to move with surprising agility, yet clamp like a limpet when faced with risk of detachment. Sweet Home Infections of Argulus in the wild are often limited to odd ones and twos, tolerated by A guide to some of the creatures most healthy fi sh.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Distribution of Tetracapsuloides Bryosalmonae Infected fi Sh in Swiss Rivers: an Update
    Aquat. Sci. 69 (2007) 3–10 1015-1621/07/010003-8 DOI 10.1007/s00027-006-0843-4 Aquatic Sciences © Eawag, Dübendorf, 2007 Research Article Geographic distribution of Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae infected fi sh in Swiss rivers: an update Thomas Wahli1,*, Daniel Bernet1, Pascale April Steiner1,2 and Heike Schmidt-Posthaus1 1 Centre for Fish and Wildlife Health, Laenggassstrasse 122, P.O. Box 8466, CH-3001 Bern, Switzerland 2 Federal Offi ce for the Environment, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland Received: 1 November 2005; revised manuscript accepted: 3 July 2006 Abstract. Proliferative kidney disease (PKD) has been sampling sites, T. bryosalmonae-infected fi sh were recognized as a potential threat to brown trout (Salmo found. The prevalence of infected fi sh at individual sites trutta) populations in Switzerland. A study performed in ranged from 0% to 100%. Infection intensity, judged on 2000/2001 on 139 sampling sites from 127 rivers in Swit- the basis of histological and immunohistochemical eval- zerland revealed a wide distribution of fi sh infected by uation for the degree of parasite infection, varied greatly Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae, the causative agent of between and within sites. PKD-positive sites were found PKD. The present study aimed to complement this data- in all areas of Switzerland. The wide distribution of the set by studying a further 115 sample sites from 91 rivers disease in Swiss rivers indicates that PKD may be a caus- and 4 fi sh farms. Mainly brown trout were investigated ative factor for the catch decline of brown trout, which for the presence of T. bryosalmonae by a combination of was suggested over recent decades in Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: 19Th Annual Workshop of the National Reference Laboratories for Fish Diseases
    Report: 19th Annual Workshop of the National Reference Laboratories for Fish Diseases Copenhagen, Denmark May 27th-28th 2015 FISH positive staining for Rickettsia like Gill necrosis in Koi Carp SVCV CPE on EPC cell culture organism in sea bass brain Organised by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Fish Diseases National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark 1 Contents INTRODUCTION AND SHORT SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................4 PROGRAM .................................................................................................................................................................8 Welcome ................................................................................................................................................................ 12 SESSION I: .............................................................................................................................................................. 13 UPDATE ON IMPORTANT FISH DISEASES IN EUROPE AND THEIR CONTROL ......................................................... 13 OVERVIEW OF THE DISEASE SITUATION AND SURVEILLANCE IN EUROPE IN 2014 .......................................... 14 UPDATE ON FISH DISEASE SITUATION IN NORWAY .......................................................................................... 17 UPDATE ON FISH DISEASE SITUATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN BASIN .......................................................... 18 PAST
    [Show full text]
  • Immune Response Modulation Upon Sequential Heterogeneous Co
    Fish and Shellfish Immunology 88 (2019) 375–390 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fish and Shellfish Immunology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fsi Full length article Immune response modulation upon sequential heterogeneous co-infection T with Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae and VHSV in brown trout (Salmo trutta) ∗ Bartolomeo Gorgoglionea,b, ,1, Nick G.H. Taylorb, Jason W. Hollanda,2, Stephen W. Feistb, ∗∗ Christopher J. Secombesa, a Scottish Fish Immunology Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK b CEFAS Weymouth Laboratory, The Nothe, Weymouth, Dorset, England, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Simultaneous and sequential infections often occur in wild and farming environments. Despite growing Co-infections awareness, co-infection studies are still very limited, mainly to a few well-established human models. European Host-pathogen interaction salmonids are susceptible to both Proliferative Kidney Disease (PKD), an endemic emergent disease caused by Response to pathogens the myxozoan parasite Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae, and Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia (VHS), an OIE no- Fish immunology tifiable listed disease caused by the Piscine Novirhabdovirus. No information is available as to how their immune Salmonids system reacts when interacting with heterogeneous infections. A chronic (PKD) + acute (VHS) sequential co- Proliferative kidney disease Myxozoa infection model was established to assess if the responses elicited in co-infected fish are modulated, when Piscine Novirhabdovirus compared to fish with single infections. Macro- and microscopic lesions were assessed after the challenge, and Histopathology infection status confirmed by RT-qPCR analysis, enabling the identification of singly-infected and co-infected Th subsets fish. A typical histophlogosis associated with histozoic extrasporogonic T.
    [Show full text]