KHV) by Serum Neutralization Test

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

KHV) by Serum Neutralization Test Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Detection of antibodies specific to koi herpesvirus (KHV) by serum neutralization test Cabon, J.; Louboutin, L.; Castric, J.; Bergmann, S. M.; Bovo, G.; Matras, M.; Haenen, O.; Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Morin, T. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Cabon, J., Louboutin, L., Castric, J., Bergmann, S. M., Bovo, G., Matras, M., ... Morin, T. (2015). Detection of antibodies specific to koi herpesvirus (KHV) by serum neutralization test. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 115-115). [O-107] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts. The abstract book contains abstracts as provided by their authors. No editing has been done except for spelling corrections. Published for: European Association of Fish Pathologists, 2015 Printed and bound in Las Palmas Copyright © European Association of Fish Pathologists, 2015 All rights reserved. No parts of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, xerography, or any information storage and removal system, without permission from the compiler. Picture front cover provide by Auditorium Alfredo Kraus 2 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Contents KEYNOTES Conference Keynote 5 Keynotes 2-4 6-8 ORAL PRESENTATIONS Viruses and viral diseases I 9 Immunosstimulamts, prebiotics and probiotics 14 Parasitic diseases I 21 Fish and shellfish immunology I 28 Parasitic diseases II 34 Nutrition and fish health 44 Aquatic fish epidemiology 49 Fish and shellfish immunology II 57 Emerging pathogens I 64 Bivalve and crustacean diseases I 71 Viruses and viral diseases II 76 Host-parasite interactions I 83 Bivalve and crustacean diseases II 90 Bacterial diseases I 96 Bacterial diseases II 105 Diagnostics 112 Environmental and toxicological diseases 120 Diseases of tuna 124 Bacterial diseases II 128 Host-parasite interactions II 135 Aquatic animal welfare I 142 Viruses and viral diseases III 146 Emerging pathogens II 153 Aquatic animal welfare II 160 Diseases of public concern 163 Fish and shellfish immunology III 167 Bacterial diseases IV 174 Fish and shellfish immunology IV 180 Prophylaxis and treatment I 187 Viruses and viral diseases IV 194 Cephalopods immunity and diseases 201 Prophylaxis and treatment II 209 Diseases of wild and ornamental fish 211 Fish and shellfish immunology V 215 Host-parasite interactions III 219 POSTER PRESENTATIONS Viruses and viral diseases 225 Immunosstimulamts, prebiotics and probiotics 257 Parasitic diseases 261 3 Fish and shellfish immunology 280 Nutrition and fish health 318 Aquatic fish epidemiology 325 Emerging pathogens 337 Bivalve and crustacean diseases 348 EDQM 356 Bacterial diseases 358 Diagnostics 380 Environmental and toxicological diseases 390 Host-parasite interactions 400 Aquatic animal welfare 417 Diseases of public concern 419 Prophylaxis and treatment 423 Cephalopods immunity and diseases 431 Diseases of wild and ornamental fish 437 WORKSHOPS WS1 Arraina 445 WS2 Mendeley 446 WS3 Novel cyprinid viruses 447 WS4 EDQM 448 WS5 Fish health in Med. aquaculture, past mistakes and future challenges 449 WS6 Publish or perish - scientific publishing workshop 450 WS7 AGD 451 WS8 Moltraq 452 WS9 Industry roundtable TargetFish 453 AUTHORS’ CONTACTS 454 4 CKN Conference keynote CHALLENGING THE DOGMA SURROUNDING THE STUDY OF BACTERIAL FISH DISEASES B. AUSTIN Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK Since the late nineteenth century, the acquisition of pure bacterial cultures has been central to all facets of microbiology. Fish pathology is no exception insofar as the goal of disease diagnostics and research is the acquisition of pure cultures of the pathogen. The basic premise is that pathological material may be inoculated onto a solid (usually gelled with agar) or into a liquid medium with incubation for a pre- determined interval when individual cells of the pathogen will be cloned into dense culture growth, which will then be subjected to further study. However, the range of media used by fish bacteriologists is restricted, and often centres on tryptone soya agar/broth, brain heart infusion agar/broth and/or marine equivalents. Moreover, the incubation regimes may have little relevance to the growth conditions of the fish. However, the desired outcome is the presence of dense virtually pure growth, which is taken as indicative of recovery of the pathogen. Unfortunately at best, a snap shot of the disease is obtained, and it may not be possible to decide if only one organism instigated the infection, and then contributed to the development of overt disease signs. It is unlikely that culturing on a single occasion would identify microbial population succession within a disease cycle. Also, conventional techniques are unlikely to recognise when two or more discrete organisms working synergistically to produce a single pathology. This situation has been observed with ulcerative conditions in cyprinids when Aeromonas salmonicida and A. hydrophila/ A. sobria may be involved together, with the former instigating infection, and the latter leading to the developing of large ulcers. Certainly, it is realized that not all cells will multiply sufficiently to produce visible colonies. Some cells produce micro-colonies that are invisible to the naked eye. Moreover, the proportion of culturable cells that produce visible growth will vary according to the species and the state of the cells – are they actively growing or comparatively inactive? The latter have a poorer rate of recovery in terms of culturability. The next premise is that an individual colony is derived from multiplication of a single cell. Yet, it is realized that cells in close proximity to each other may multiply and come together to produce a single colony. Then, the resultant growth will most certainly be derived from more than one initial cell. This has greater relevance if the two initial cells are from two different species. Although it is generally assumed that streaking and re-streaking on fresh media will purify any culture, there is evidence for microbial consortia interacting to form what appear to be single pure cultures. Thus, seemingly pure cultures of purple-pigmented aquatic bacteria were recognized to contain cells of A. salmonicida. As so-called pure cultures underpin most of microbiology, it is relevant to understand that the culture does not necessarily contain clones of identical bacteria, but that there is a variation in the genetic potential of the component cells, i.e. the cells are not homogeneous. Certainly, many bacteria change rapidly upon culturing in the laboratory. Cells may become bigger and less active in the laboratory, i.e. genetic potential is lost. It is difficult to be sure if the changes reflect a loss of DNA or whether standard culturing methods select faster growing cells that are effectively not representative of the environment from which they were derived. 5 KN-­‐2 AQUATIC VERSUS NON-AQUATIC HERPESVIRUSES: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES A. VANDERPLASSCHEN Immunology-Vaccinology, Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium The order Herpesvirales encompasses viruses that share structural, genetic and biological properties. However, members of this order infect hosts ranging from molluscs to humans. It is currently divided into three phylogenetically related families. The Herpesviridae family encompasses viruses infecting mammals, birds or reptiles. It is by far the most important, in terms both of the number of its members and the volume of studies that have been devoted to them. The Alloherpesviridae family encompasses viruses infecting fish and amphibians. And finally, the Malacoherpesviridae family comprises viruses infecting molluscs. Over the last decade, an increasing number of studies have been devoted to alloherpesviruses and malacoherpesviruses. Scientific interest in these viruses tends to originate from their impact on wildlife, the economic losses they cause to the aquaculture industry, or their importance as fundamental research object. In this talk, we will review the similarities and the differences existing between herpesviruses infecting aquatic and non-aquatic animals. 6 KN-­‐3 WHAT’S NEW IN BIVALVE MOLLUSC PATHOLOGY? OVERVIEW OF ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THE LAST TWO YEARS A. VILLALBA Centro de Investigacións Mariñas (CIMA), Consellería do Medio
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Hook, Line and Infection: A Guide to Culturing Parasites, Establishing Infections and Assessing Immune Responses in the Three-Spined Stickleback Alexander Stewart*, Joseph Jacksonx, Iain Barber{, Christophe Eizaguirrejj, Rachel Paterson*, Pieter van West#, Chris Williams** and Joanne Cable*,1 *Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom x University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom { University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom jj Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom #Institute of Medical Sciences, Aberdeen, United Kingdom **National Fisheries Service, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom 1Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Stickleback Husbandry 7 2.1 Ethics 7 2.2 Collection 7 2.3 Maintenance 9 2.4 Breeding sticklebacks in vivo and in vitro 10 2.5 Hatchery 15 3. Common Stickleback Parasite Cultures 16 3.1 Argulus foliaceus 17 3.1.1 Introduction 17 3.1.2 Source, culture and infection 18 3.1.3 Immunology 22 3.2 Camallanus lacustris 22 3.2.1 Introduction 22 3.2.2 Source, culture and infection 23 3.2.3 Immunology 25 3.3 Diplostomum Species 26 3.3.1 Introduction 26 3.3.2 Source, culture and infection 27 3.3.3 Immunology 28 Advances in Parasitology, Volume 98 ISSN 0065-308X © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2017.07.001 All rights reserved. 1 j ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 Alexander Stewart et al. 3.4 Glugea anomala 30 3.4.1 Introduction 30 3.4.2 Source, culture and infection 30 3.4.3 Immunology 31 3.5 Gyrodactylus Species 31 3.5.1 Introduction 31 3.5.2 Source, culture and infection 32 3.5.3 Immunology 34 3.6 Saprolegnia parasitica 35 3.6.1 Introduction 35 3.6.2 Source, culture and infection 36 3.6.3 Immunology 37 3.7 Schistocephalus solidus 38 3.7.1 Introduction 38 3.7.2 Source, culture and infection 39 3.7.3 Immunology 43 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Cell Lines to Study Factors Affecting Transmission of Fish Viruses
    Using cell lines to study factors affecting transmission of fish viruses by Phuc Hoang Pham A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2014 ©Phuc Hoang Pham 2014 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT Factors that can influence the transmission of aquatic viruses in fish production facilities and natural environment are the immune defense of host species, the ability of viruses to infect host cells, and the environmental persistence of viruses. In this thesis, fish cell lines were used to study different aspects of these factors. Five viruses were used in this study: viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) from the Rhabdoviridae family; chum salmon reovirus (CSV) from the Reoviridae family; infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) from the Birnaviridae family; and grouper iridovirus (GIV) and frog virus-3 (FV3) from the Iridoviridae family. The first factor affecting the transmission of fish viruses examined in this thesis is the immune defense of host species. In this work, infections of marine VHSV-IVa and freshwater VHSV-IVb were studied in two rainbow trout cell lines, RTgill-W1 from the gill epithelium, and RTS11 from spleen macrophages. RTgill-W1 produced infectious progeny of both VHSV-IVa and -IVb. However, VHSV-IVa was more infectious than IVb toward RTgill-W1: IVa caused cytopathic effects (CPE) at a lower viral titre, elicited CPE earlier, and yielded higher titres.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHSV): on the Search for Determinants Important for Virulence in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Skall, H. F.; Kurita, J.; Mori, K.; Ito, T. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Olesen, N. J., Skall, H. F., Kurita, J., Mori, K., & Ito, T. (2015). Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 147-147). [O-139] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Viral Communities of Biting Midges and Identification
    viruses Article Characterization of Viral Communities of Biting Midges and Identification of Novel Thogotovirus Species and Rhabdovirus Genus Sarah Temmam 1, Sonia Monteil-Bouchard 1, Catherine Robert 1, Jean-Pierre Baudoin 1, Masse Sambou 1, Maxence Aubadie-Ladrix 1, Noémie Labas 1, Didier Raoult 1,2, Oleg Mediannikov 1 and Christelle Desnues 1,* 1 Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes (URMITE), UM63 CNRS 7278 IRD 198 INSERM U1095, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille 13005, France; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (S.M.-B.); [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (J.-P.B.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (M.A.-L.); [email protected] (N.L.); [email protected] (D.R.); [email protected] (O.M.). 2 Fondation IHU Méditerranée Infection, Pôle des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Clinique et Biologique, Fédération de Bactériologie-Hygiène-Virologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Timone, Méditerranée Infection, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille 13005, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-0-491324630; Fax: +33-0-491387772 Academic Editors: Johnson Mak, Peter Walker and Marcus Thomas Gilbert Received: 21 October 2015; Accepted: 1 March 2016; Published: 11 March 2016 Abstract: More than two thirds of emerging viruses are of zoonotic origin, and among them RNA viruses represent the majority. Ceratopogonidae (genus Culicoides) are well-known vectors of several viruses responsible for epizooties (bluetongue, epizootic haemorrhagic disease, etc.). They are also vectors of the only known virus infecting humans: the Oropouche virus. Female midges usually feed on a variety of hosts, leading to possible transmission of emerging viruses from animals to humans.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 Appendix 11: Approved Animal Drugs for Aqua
    APPENDIX 11: APPROVED ANIMAL DRUGS FOR AQUACULTURE USE This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the telephone number listed on the title page of this guidance. APPROVED ANIMAL DRUGS FOR AQUACULTURE Species/Class: Freshwater-reared salmonids, walleye, and freshwater-reared warmwater Animal Drugs for aquacultured food fish must meet finfish human food safety standards assessed during the approval process. When a fish producer (farmer) Indication for Use (21 CFR 529.382): or hatchery manager uses an approved drug for food fish as directed on the label, the treated fish • For the control of mortality in freshwater- are safe to eat. reared salmonids due to bacterial gill disease associated with Flavobacterium spp. The FDA-approved animal drugs for use in • For the control of mortality in walleye due aquaculture, with information on their approved to external columnaris disease associated sponsor/supplier, species for which the approval with Flavobacterium columnare. has been granted, required withdrawal periods, • For the control of mortality in freshwater- and other conditions are listed below. Additional reared warmwater finfish due to external details on provisions of use (e.g., administration columnaris disease associated with route, dosage level) can be obtained from Flavobacterium columnare.
    [Show full text]
  • Are All Species of Pseudorhabdosynochus Strictly Host Specific? – a Molecular Study
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by HAL-CEA Are all species of Pseudorhabdosynochus strictly host specific? - a molecular study Charlotte Schoelinck, Corinne Cruaud, Jean-Lou Justine To cite this version: Charlotte Schoelinck, Corinne Cruaud, Jean-Lou Justine. Are all species of Pseudorhabdosyn- ochus strictly host specific? - a molecular study. Parasitology International, Elsevier, 2012, 61, 10.1016/j.parint.2012.01.009. <10.1016/j.parint.2012.01.009>. <mnhn-00673113> HAL Id: mnhn-00673113 https://hal-mnhn.archives-ouvertes.fr/mnhn-00673113 Submitted on 22 Feb 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. Parasitology International, in press 2012 – DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2012.01.009 Are all species of Pseudorhabdosynochus strictly host specific? – a molecular study Charlotte Schoelinck (a, b) Corinne Cruaud (c), Jean-Lou Justine (a) (a) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, CP 51, 55 Rue Buffon, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France. (b) Service de Systématique moléculaire (CNRS-MNHN, UMS2700), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, CP 26, 43 Rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.
    [Show full text]
  • ERV) on Cell Culture
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Characterization of eelpout rhabdovirus (ERV) on cell culture Blomkvist, E.; Alfjorden, A.; Hakhverdyan, Mikhayil; Boutrup, Torsten Snogdal; Ahola, H.; Ljunghager, F.; Hagström, Å.; Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Juremalm, M.; Leijon, M.; Valarcher, J.-F.; Axen, C. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Blomkvist, E., Alfjorden, A., Hakhverdyan, M., Boutrup, T. S., Ahola, H., Ljunghager, F., ... Axen, C. (2015). Characterization of eelpout rhabdovirus (ERV) on cell culture. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 228-228). [P-004] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Perch Rhabdovirus (PRV) in Farmed Grayling Thymallus Thymallus
    Vol. 106: 117–127, 2013 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published October 11 doi: 10.3354/dao02654 Dis Aquat Org FREEREE ACCESSCCESS Characterization of perch rhabdovirus (PRV) in farmed grayling Thymallus thymallus Tuija Gadd1,*, Satu Viljamaa-Dirks2, Riikka Holopainen1, Perttu Koski3, Miia Jakava-Viljanen1,4 1Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Mustialankatu 3, 00790 Helsinki, Finland 2Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Neulaniementie, 70210 Kuopio, Finland 3Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Elektroniikkatie 3, 90590 Oulu, Finland 4Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, PO Box 30, 00023 Government, Finland ABSTRACT: Two Finnish fish farms experienced elevated mortality rates in farmed grayling Thy- mallus thymallus fry during the summer months, most typically in July. The mortalities occurred during several years and were connected with a few neurological disorders and peritonitis. Viro- logical investigation detected an infection with an unknown rhabdovirus. Based on the entire gly- coprotein (G) and partial RNA polymerase (L) gene sequences, the virus was classified as a perch rhabdovirus (PRV). Pairwise comparisons of the G and L gene regions of grayling isolates revealed that all isolates were very closely related, with 99 to 100% nucleotide identity, which suggests the same origin of infection. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that they were closely related to the strain isolated from perch Perca fluviatilis and sea trout Salmo trutta trutta caught from the Baltic Sea. The entire G gene sequences revealed that all Finnish grayling isolates, and both the perch and sea trout isolates, were most closely related to a PRV isolated in France in 2004. According to the partial L gene sequences, all of the Finnish grayling isolates were most closely related to the Danish isolate DK5533 from pike.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Coral Reef Fish: How Much Do We Know? with a Bibliography of Fish Parasites in New Caledonia
    Belg. J. Zool., 140 (Suppl.): 155-190 July 2010 Parasites of coral reef fish: how much do we know? With a bibliography of fish parasites in New Caledonia Jean-Lou Justine (1) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, F-75321 Paris Cedex 05, France (2) Aquarium des lagons, B.P. 8185, 98807 Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Corresponding author: Jean-Lou Justine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A compilation of 107 references dealing with fish parasites in New Caledonia permitted the production of a parasite-host list and a host-parasite list. The lists include Turbellaria, Monopisthocotylea, Polyopisthocotylea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Copepoda, Isopoda, Acanthocephala and Hirudinea, with 580 host-parasite combinations, corresponding with more than 370 species of parasites. Protozoa are not included. Platyhelminthes are the major group, with 239 species, including 98 monopisthocotylean monogeneans and 105 digeneans. Copepods include 61 records, and nematodes include 41 records. The list of fish recorded with parasites includes 195 species, in which most (ca. 170 species) are coral reef associated, the rest being a few deep-sea, pelagic or freshwater fishes. The serranids, lethrinids and lutjanids are the most commonly represented fish families. Although a list of published records does not provide a reliable estimate of biodiversity because of the important bias in publications being mainly in the domain of interest of the authors, it provides a basis to compare parasite biodiversity with other localities, and especially with other coral reefs. The present list is probably the most complete published account of parasite biodiversity of coral reef fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Notophthalmus Viridescens) by a New Species of Amphibiocystidium, a Genus of Fungus-Like Mesomycetozoan Parasites Not Previously Reported in North America
    203 Widespread infection of the Eastern red-spotted newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) by a new species of Amphibiocystidium, a genus of fungus-like mesomycetozoan parasites not previously reported in North America T. R. RAFFEL1,2*, T. BOMMARITO 3, D. S. BARRY4, S. M. WITIAK5 and L. A. SHACKELTON1 1 Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Biology Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 2 Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA 3 Cooperative Wildlife Research Lab, Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755, USA 5 Department of Plant Pathology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA (Received 21 March 2007; revised 17 August 2007; accepted 20 August 2007; first published online 12 October 2007) SUMMARY Given the worldwide decline of amphibian populations due to emerging infectious diseases, it is imperative that we identify and address the causative agents. Many of the pathogens recently implicated in amphibian mortality and morbidity have been fungal or members of a poorly understood group of fungus-like protists, the mesomycetozoans. One mesomycetozoan, Amphibiocystidium ranae, is known to infect several European amphibian species and was associated with a recent decline of frogs in Italy. Here we present the first report of an Amphibiocystidium sp. in a North American amphibian, the Eastern red-spotted newt (Notophthalmus viridescens), and characterize it as the new species A. viridescens in the order Dermocystida based on morphological, geographical and phylogenetic evidence. We also describe the widespread and seasonal distribution of this parasite in red-spotted newt populations and provide evidence of mortality due to infection.
    [Show full text]
  • FIELD GUIDE to WARMWATER FISH DISEASES in CENTRAL and EASTERN EUROPE, the CAUCASUS and CENTRAL ASIA Cover Photographs: Courtesy of Kálmán Molnár and Csaba Székely
    SEC/C1182 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular I SSN 2070-6065 FIELD GUIDE TO WARMWATER FISH DISEASES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA Cover photographs: Courtesy of Kálmán Molnár and Csaba Székely. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1182 SEC/C1182 (En) FIELD GUIDE TO WARMWATER FISH DISEASES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA By Kálmán Molnár1, Csaba Székely1 and Mária Láng2 1Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary 2 National Food Chain Safety Office – Veterinary Diagnostic Directorate, Budapest, Hungary FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Ankara, 2019 Required citation: Molnár, K., Székely, C. and Láng, M. 2019. Field guide to the control of warmwater fish diseases in Central and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No.1182. Ankara, FAO. 124 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Position the EU Thanks the OIE and in General Supports the Adoption of This Modified User's Guide
    Ref. Ares(2018)2526762 - 15/05/2018 Annex 2 Original: English February 2018 REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE OIE AQUATIC ANIMAL HEALTH STANDARDS COMMISSION EU comment The EU would like to commend the OIE Aquatic Animal Health Standards Commission for its work and for having taken into consideration EU comments on the Aquatic Code and Manual submitted previously. A number of general comments on this report of the February 2018 meeting of the Aquatic Animals Commission as well as the intended positions of the EU on the draft Aquatic Code and Manual chapters proposed for adoption at the 86th OIE General Session are inserted in the text below, while specific comments are inserted in the text of the respective annexes to the report. The EU would like to stress again its continued commitment to participate in the work of the OIE and to offer all technical support needed by the Aquatic Animals Commission and its ad hoc groups for future work on the Aquatic Code and Manual. The OIE Aquatic Animal Health Standards Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Aquatic Animals Commission) met at OIE Headquarters in Paris from 14 to 21 February 2018. The list of participants is attached as Annex 1. The Aquatic Animals Commission thanked the following Member Countries for providing written comments on draft texts for the OIE Aquatic Animal Health Code (hereinafter referred to as the Aquatic Code) and OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals (hereinafter referred to as the Aquatic Manual) circulated after the Commission’s September 2017 meeting: Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Chinese Taipei, Costa Rica, Fiji, Guatemala, Japan, Mexico, New Caledonia, Norway, Singapore, Switzerland, Thailand, the United States of America (USA) and the Member States of the European Union (EU).
    [Show full text]