DOCSLIB.ORG

EU Position the EU Thanks the OIE and in General Supports the Adoption of This Modified User's Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ref. Ares(2018)2526762 - 15/05/2018 Annex 2 Original: English February 2018 REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE OIE AQUATIC ANIMAL HEALTH STANDARDS COMMISSION EU comment The EU would like to commend the OIE Aquatic Animal Health Standards Commission for its work and for having taken into consideration EU comments on the Aquatic Code and Manual submitted previously. A number of general comments on this report of the February 2018 meeting of the Aquatic Animals Commission as well as the intended positions of the EU on the draft Aquatic Code and Manual chapters proposed for adoption at the 86th OIE General Session are inserted in the text below, while specific comments are inserted in the text of the respective annexes to the report. The EU would like to stress again its continued commitment to participate in the work of the OIE and to offer all technical support needed by the Aquatic Animals Commission and its ad hoc groups for future work on the Aquatic Code and Manual. The OIE Aquatic Animal Health Standards Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Aquatic Animals Commission) met at OIE Headquarters in Paris from 14 to 21 February 2018. The list of participants is attached as Annex 1. The Aquatic Animals Commission thanked the following Member Countries for providing written comments on draft texts for the OIE Aquatic Animal Health Code (hereinafter referred to as the Aquatic Code) and OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals (hereinafter referred to as the Aquatic Manual) circulated after the Commission’s September 2017 meeting: Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Chinese Taipei, Costa Rica, Fiji, Guatemala, Japan, Mexico, New Caledonia, Norway, Singapore, Switzerland, Thailand, the United States of America (USA) and the Member States of the European Union (EU). The Aquatic Animals Commission reviewed comments that Member Countries had submitted and amended texts in the OIE Aquatic Code and Aquatic Manual where appropriate. The amendments are shown in the usual manner by ‘double underline’ and ‘strikethrough’ and may be found in the Annexes to this report. The amendments made at this meeting are highlighted with a coloured background in order to distinguish them from those made at the September 2017 meeting. The Aquatic Animals Commission considered all Member Country comments that were supported by a rationale. However, the Commission was not able to draft a detailed explanation of the reasons for accepting or not accepting every comment received. The Aquatic Animals Commission encourages Member Countries to refer to previous reports when preparing comments on longstanding issues. The Commission also draws the attention of Member Countries to relevant reports of ad hoc Groups, which include important information and are provided as annexes to Commission’s reports. The Commission encourages Member Countries to review these reports together with the report of the Commission. The Commission reminded Member Countries that all of the OIE ad hoc Group reports (since 2016) are also provided on the OIE website as stand-alone documents (available at OIE •12, rue de Prony • 75017 Paris • France Tel.: 33 (0)1 44 15 18 88 • Fax: 33 (0)1 42 67 09 87 • www.oie.int • [email protected] 2 http://www.oie.int/en/standard-setting/specialists-commissions-working-groups/scientific-commission- reports/ad-hoc-groups-reports/). The table below lists the texts as presented in the Annexes. Member Countries should note that texts in Annexes 3 to 28 are proposed for adoption at the 86th General Session in May 2018; Annexes 29 to 36 are presented for Member Country comment; and Annexes 37 to 40 are presented for information. The Aquatic Animals Commission strongly encourages Member Countries to participate in the development of the OIE’s international standards by preparing to participate in the process of adoption of texts in Annexes 3 to 28 at the 86th General Session. The Commission also invites the submission of comments on Annexes 29 to 36 of this report. Comments should be submitted as specific proposed text changes, supported by a scientific rationale. Proposed deletions should be indicated by ‘strikethrough’ and proposed additions with ‘double underline’. Member Countries should not use the automatic ‘track-changes’ function provided by word processing software as such changes are lost in the process of collating Member Countries’ submissions into the Commission’s working documents. Comments on Annexes 29 to 36 of this report must reach OIE Headquarters by the 30 July 2018 to be considered at the September 2018 meeting of the Aquatic Animals Commission. Comments received after the due date will not be submitted to the Commission for consideration at their September 2018 meeting. All comments should be sent to the OIE Standards Department at: [email protected]. Item Texts proposed for adoption Annex number Page number AQUATIC CODE 1.2. User’s guide Annex 3 31 1.3. Glossary Annex 4 35 1.4. Diseases listed by the OIE (Article 1.3.) Annex 5 37 1.6. OIE procedures relevant to the Agreement on the Application of Annex 6 39 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures of the World Trade Organization (Chapter 5.3.) 1.7. Criteria to assess the safety of aquatic animal commodities Annex 7 47 (Chapter 5.4.) 1.8.1. New draft chapter for Infection with Batrachochytrium Annex 8 49 salamandrivorans (Chapter 8.X.) 1.8.2. Infection with Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Chapter 8.1.) Annex 9 55 1.8.3. Infection with ranavirus (Chapter 8.2.) Annex 10 63 1.9. Infection with infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis Annex 11 69 virus (Articles 9.4.1. and 9.4.2.) 1.10.1. Epizootic haematopoietic necrosis (Chapter 10.1.) Annex 12 71 1.10.2. Infection with Aphanomyces invadans (epizootic ulcerative Annex 13 77 syndrome) (Chapter 10.2.) 1.10.3. Infection with Gyrodactylus salaris (Chapter 10.3.) Annex 14 83 1.10.4. Infection with infectious salmon anaemia virus (Chapter 10.4.) Annex 15 91 OIE Aquatic Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2018 3 1.10.5. Infection with salmonid alphavirus (Chapter 10.5.) Annex 16 101 1.10.6. Infectious haematopoietic necrosis (Chapter 10.6.) Annex 17 109 1.10.7. Koi herpesvirus disease (Chapter 10.7.) Annex 18 117 1.10.8. Red sea bream iridoviral disease (Chapter 10.8.) Annex 19 123 1.10.9. Spring viraemia of carp (Chapter 10.9.) Annex 20 129 1.10.10. Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (Chapter 10.10.) Annex 21 137 1.11. Model Articles X.X.8., X.X.9., X.X.10. and X.X.11. Annex 22 143 Item Texts proposed for adoption Annex number Page number AQUATIC MANUAL 4.2. White spot disease (Chapter 2.2.8.) Annex 23 145 4.3.1. Epizootic haematopoietic necrosis virus (Chapter 2.3.1.) Annex 24 163 4.3.2. Infection with Gyrodactylus salaris (Chapter 2.3.3.) Annex 25 189 4.3.3. Infection with infectious salmon anaemia virus (Chapter 2.3.5.) Annex 26 201 Infection with infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis 4.4 Annex 27 221 virus (Chapter 2.2.3.) 4.5. Acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (Chapter 2.2.1.) Annex 28 223 Texts for Member Country comment: Annex number Page number AQUATIC CODE 1.3. Glossary Annex 29 225 1.5. Criteria for listing species as susceptible (Chapter 1.5.); clean (A) Annexes 30 A 227 and track changes (B) and 30 B 1.10.5. Article 10.5.2. Infection with salmonid alphavirus (Chapter 10.5.) Annex 31 235 1.10.7. Article 10.7.2. Koi herpesvirus disease (Chapter 10.7.) Annex 32 237 1.10.9. Article 10.9.2. Spring viraemia of carp (Chapter 10.9.) Annex 33 239 AQUATIC MANUAL 4.6.1. Infection with salmonid alphavirus (Chapter 2.3.6.) Annex 34 241 4.6.2. Koi herpesvirus disease (Chapter 2.3.7.) Annex 35 255 4.7. Infection with yellow head virus genotype 1 (Chapter 2.2.9.) Annex 36 275 (Section 2.2.2.) Item Annexes for Member Country information: Page number 3.1. Report of the ad hoc Group on Susceptibility of fish species to Annex 37 277 infection with OIE listed diseases 3.4. Report of the electronic ad hoc Group on Tilapia lake virus Annex 38 311 5.1. Proposed new Aquatic Manual disease chapter template Annex 39 321 J Aquatic Animals Commission Work Plan for 2017/2018 Annex 40 339 A. MEETING WITH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OIE Aquatic Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2018 4 The Aquatic Animals Commission met with Dr Monique Eloit, Director General, on 19 February 2018. Dr Eloit welcomed the Commission members and thanked them for their ongoing support and commitment noting that this was the last meeting of the current Commission. Dr Eloit provided an update on the new process for election to the OIE Specialist Commissions. She noted that the report of the Evaluation Committee on the nomination for election to the OIE Specialist Commissions will be considered by the Council at their February 2018 meeting. She informed the Commission that the final list will be provided to OIE Delegates prior to the 2018 General Session. Dr Eloit also mentioned that preparations are underway for the development of the 7th Strategic Plan. B. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The draft agenda circulated prior to the meeting was discussed, updated, and agreed. The adopted agenda of the meeting is attached as Annex 2. C. MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT OF THE OIE TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL HEALTH STANDARDS COMMISSION The President of the Aquatic Animals Commission met with the President of the Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Code Commission) during the week when both Commissions were meeting.
Recommended publications
  • From the Caribbean Sea

    From the Caribbean Sea

    Cah. Biol. Mar. (2007) 48 : 241-247 Alpheus zimmermani sp. nov., a new colourful snapping shrimp (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Caribbean Sea Arthur ANKER Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales, Apartado 0843–03092, Balboa, Ancón, Panamá, República de Panamá / Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Naos Unit 0948, APO AA 34002, USA. Email: [email protected] Abstract: A new snapping shrimp, Alpheus zimmermani sp. nov. is described on the basis of a single specimen collected on a coral reef off Guana Island, British Virgin Islands, Caribbean Sea. The new species has some morphological similarities with A. bouvieri A. Milne-Edwards and A. leviusculus Dana, but differs from these taxa by the strong medio- dorsal carina reaching far beyond the mid-length of the carapace, several features on the chelipeds, and by the conspicuous colour pattern. Résumé : Alpheus zimmermani sp. nov., une nouvelle crevette pistolet très colorée (Crustacea : Decapoda) de la Mer Caraïbe. Une nouvelle espèce de crevette-pistolet, Alpheus zimmermani sp. nov., est décrite avec un seul spécimen récolté sur un récif de corail au large de l’île de Guana faisant partie des Îles Vierges Britanniques, dans la Mer Caraïbe. L’espèce nouvelle possède quelques similarités avec A. bouvieri A. Milne-Edwards et A. leviusculus Dana, mais diffère nettement de ces deux espèces par la carène médiodorsale très prononcée et atteignant la moitié postérieure de la carapace, par plusieurs caractères sur les chélipèdes, ainsi que par sa remarquable coloration. Keywords: Alpheidae l Alpheus l Snapping shrimp l New species l Western Atlantic l Coral reef l Colour pattern. Introduction Wicksten & McClure, 2003).
  • <I>Bartholomea Annulata</I>

    <I>Bartholomea Annulata</I>

    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 37(3): 893-904,1985 CORAL REEF PAPER TWO MORE SIBLING SPECIES OF ALPHEID SHRIMPS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CARIBBEAN SEA ANEMONES BARTHOLOMEA ANNULATA AND HETERACTIS LUCIDA Nancy Knowlton and Brian D. Keller ABSTRACT We have described two new species of snapping shrimp, Alpheus polystictus and A. ro- quensis. The new species form part of a complex of four sibling species associated with Caribbean sea anemones, the others being the well-known A. armatus Rathbun, 1900 and the recently describedA. immaculatus Knowlton and Keller, 1983. Alpheus roquensis is found with the anemone Heteractis lucida. while the other three shrimps live with Bartholomea annulata. In laboratory choice experiments, each shrimp species prefers the species of an em- one with which it is typically found in the field, although each can shelter under the other species of anemone. All four species are extremely similar morphologically, being distin- guished largely on the basis of color pattern. The validity of the species is confirmed by the total absence of interbreeding; heterospecific male-female pairs are never found in the field, and it is impossible to force pairings between species in the laboratory. Alpheus polystictus is rare in Jamaica and Haiti, while in Venezuela it is sometimes the dominant species to depths of 10 m. In the areas examined, it has always occurred with at least one of the other two Bartholomea associates. The geographic distribution of A. roquensis is more limited, as there are no reports of alpheids associated with Heteractis lucida, and none has been found with this anemone in Jamaica.
  • Aquatic Animal Viruses Mediated Immune Evasion in Their Host T ∗ Fei Ke, Qi-Ya Zhang

    Aquatic Animal Viruses Mediated Immune Evasion in Their Host T ∗ Fei Ke, Qi-Ya Zhang

    Fish and Shellfish Immunology 86 (2019) 1096–1105 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fish and Shellfish Immunology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fsi Aquatic animal viruses mediated immune evasion in their host T ∗ Fei Ke, Qi-Ya Zhang State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Viruses are important and lethal pathogens that hamper aquatic animals. The result of the battle between host Aquatic animal virus and virus would determine the occurrence of diseases. The host will fight against virus infection with various Immune evasion responses such as innate immunity, adaptive immunity, apoptosis, and so on. On the other hand, the virus also Virus-host interactions develops numerous strategies such as immune evasion to antagonize host antiviral responses. Here, We review Virus targeted molecular and pathway the research advances on virus mediated immune evasions to host responses containing interferon response, NF- Host responses κB signaling, apoptosis, and adaptive response, which are executed by viral genes, proteins, and miRNAs from different aquatic animal viruses including Alloherpesviridae, Iridoviridae, Nimaviridae, Birnaviridae, Reoviridae, and Rhabdoviridae. Thus, it will facilitate the understanding of aquatic animal virus mediated immune evasion and potentially benefit the development of novel antiviral applications. 1. Introduction Various antiviral responses have been revealed [19–22]. How they are overcome by different viruses? Here, we select twenty three strains Aquatic viruses have been an essential part of the biosphere, and of aquatic animal viruses which represent great harms to aquatic ani- also a part of human and aquatic animal lives.
  • Protection of Host Anemones by Snapping Shrimps: a Case for Symbiotic Mutualism?

    Protection of Host Anemones by Snapping Shrimps: a Case for Symbiotic Mutualism?

    Symbiosis DOI 10.1007/s13199-014-0289-8 Protection of host anemones by snapping shrimps: a case for symbiotic mutualism? AmberM.McCammon& W. Randy Brooks Received: 4 June 2014 /Accepted: 29 July 2014 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The sea anemone Bartholomea annulata is an eco- especially common in marine environments (Roughgarden logically important member of Caribbean coral reefs which host 1975; Poulin and Grutter 1996;Côté2000). Mutualism; a a variety of symbiotic crustacean associates. Crustacean type of symbiotic relationship in which both partners derive exosymbionts typically gain protection from predation by dwell- some benefit from the association, are also widespread across ing with anemones. Concurrently, some symbionts may provide taxa (Boucher et al. 1982). The benefit(s) of symbiont- protection to their host by defending against anemone predators mediated protection of host species from microbial disease, such as the predatory fireworm, Hermodice carunculata,which parasites, and predators is increasingly evident (Haine 2008). can severely damage or completely devour prey anemones. Protection mechanisms are diverse and include various sym- Herein we show through both field and laboratory studies that biont derived chemical defenses (Haine 2008) as well as anemones hosting the symbiotic alpheid shrimp Alpheus armatus maintenance behaviors (Heil and McKey 2003; Stier et al. are significantly less likely to sustain damage by H. carunculata 2012) and defensive social interactions (Glynn 1980; Brooks than anemones without this shrimp. Our results suggest that the and Gwaltney 1993; Heil and McKey 2003;McKeonetal. association between A. armatus and B. annulata, although com- 2012). Previous studies have demonstrated that some crusta- plex because of the numerous symbionts involved, may be closer ceans will actively defend host cnidarians in their natural to mutualism on the symbiotic continuum.
  • Real Damage to the Shrimp. It Is Best to Keep Bongo Shrimp Singly Or in Established Pairs

    Real Damage to the Shrimp. It Is Best to Keep Bongo Shrimp Singly Or in Established Pairs

    real damage to the shrimp. It is best to keep Bongo Shrimp singly or in established pairs. PISTOL SHRIMP Pistol shrimp are very different from most other species of shrimp in that they burrow and have the ability to stun and kill their various prey without ever touching them. Most pistol shrimp are in the Alpheidae family and Alpheus genus and are found all over the world. Pistol shrimp get their name from their particular ability to snap their modified larger claw in order to injure prey or predators. The snap is so powerful that it creates a microscopic bubble which shoots out of the claw towards its target. The bubble moves so fast that scientists have recorded the sound to be about 218 Tiger Pistol Shrimp (Alpheus bellulus). Image by Sabine Penisson. decibels, comparable to the sound of a gun-shot. The temperature inside the micro-bubble has been reported to reach approximately 4,700ºC, which is nearly the temperature of the surface of the sun Bongo Shrimp is both a much rarer and more cryptic starfish- (approximately 5,500ºC). The most common species in the trade eating species encountered infrequently in the trade. They are also are Randall’s Pistol Shrimp (Alpheus randalli), Tiger Pistol Shrimp intensely captivating. Bongo Shrimp are orange, black, and white (Alpheus bellulus), Anemone Pistol Shrimp (Alpheus armatus), and and sometimes have tiny blue spots. They grow to about ¾ of an Bull’s Eye Pistol Shrimp (Alpheus soror). A more rarely encountered inch in length and are best kept in nano or pico aquariums.
  • Alpheus Agrogon, a New Species of Alpheid Shrimp (Decapoda: Alpheidae) from Gorgona Island, Pacific Coast of Colombia 11

    Alpheus Agrogon, a New Species of Alpheid Shrimp (Decapoda: Alpheidae) from Gorgona Island, Pacific Coast of Colombia 11

    Rev. 8;01. Trop .. 44(3Y45(1): 395-400.1996-1997 Alpheus agrogon, a new species of alpheid shrimp (Decapoda: Alpheidae) from Gorgona Island, Pacific coast of Colombia 11 Gabriel E. Ramos' Contribución No. 63 del CIME. Centro de Investigaciones Marinas y Estuarinas de la Universidad del Valle. 1 Apartado A�reo 24262. Cali. Colombia. (Re<. 13-IX-I995. Rev. 20-VI-1995. Accep. 28-IX-I995) Abstraet: A ocw species of alpheid shrimp.AlpMus agrogon, is described (rom Gorgona Island. Pacific coa"'! of Colombia, whc:re il wa...; collected in a tide pool.1ñe new spec:ies resembles mosl c10sely A. hy�youflga� Kim &. Abele. and A. "cOpUIU.f Kim &. Abele. bul can be differentiated by the: absence of a rostral carioa belwecn the base of roslrum and Ihe posterior margin of eyes, of leelh or spines aJong lhe inner inferior margin of merus of tirsl pair of pereopods, and of movable spine on lhe ischium of third and fourth pereopods. Key words: Alph�u.f uxro/(on, ocw species. Alpheidae.Gorgona Island.Colombia Several papers describing new species of descriplion. During an aulhor visil lo Ihe alpheid shrimps from Ihe Pacific coasl of National Museum of Natural History. Colombia and ilS islands have been published Smithsonian Institution, Washinglon. D.C., (Abele 1975, Chrisloffersen & Ramos 1988a, lype malerial of selecled species of lhis genus, 1988b, Wickslen 1988, 1989, Ramos & Prahl known from the area, were also exarnined and 1989). Recenlly, Lemailre & Alvarez (1992) compared lo lhe collecled specimen. The laxo­ compiled Ihe published lileralure on decapod nornic analysis lead to the conclusion that it crustaceans from this coast, and recorded in a belongs lo an undescribed species.
  • Viruses 2015, 7, 456-479; Doi:10.3390/V7020456 OPEN ACCESS

    Viruses 2015, 7, 456-479; Doi:10.3390/V7020456 OPEN ACCESS

    Viruses 2015, 7, 456-479; doi:10.3390/v7020456 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Article In Search of Pathogens: Transcriptome-Based Identification of Viral Sequences from the Pine Processionary Moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) Agata K. Jakubowska 1, Remziye Nalcacioglu 2, Anabel Millán-Leiva 3, Alejandro Sanz-Carbonell 1, Hacer Muratoglu 4, Salvador Herrero 1,* and Zihni Demirbag 2,* 1 Department of Genetics, Universitat de València, Dr Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Spain; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.K.J.); [email protected] (A.S.-C.) 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora” (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Estación Experimental “La Mayora”, Algarrobo-Costa, 29750 Málaga, Spain; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey; E-Mail: [email protected] * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (Z.D.); Tel.: +34-96-354-3006 (S.H.); +90-462-377-3320 (Z.D.); Fax: +34-96-354-3029 (S.H.); +90-462-325-3195 (Z.D.). Academic Editors: John Burand and Madoka Nakai Received: 29 November 2014 / Accepted: 13 January 2015 / Published: 23 January 2015 Abstract: Thaumetopoea pityocampa (pine processionary moth) is one of the most important pine pests in the forests of Mediterranean countries, Central Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Apart from causing significant damage to pinewoods, T.
  • KHV) by Serum Neutralization Test

    KHV) by Serum Neutralization Test

    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Detection of antibodies specific to koi herpesvirus (KHV) by serum neutralization test Cabon, J.; Louboutin, L.; Castric, J.; Bergmann, S. M.; Bovo, G.; Matras, M.; Haenen, O.; Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Morin, T. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Cabon, J., Louboutin, L., Castric, J., Bergmann, S. M., Bovo, G., Matras, M., ... Morin, T. (2015). Detection of antibodies specific to koi herpesvirus (KHV) by serum neutralization test. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 115-115). [O-107] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts.
  • Arenaviridae Astroviridae Filoviridae Flaviviridae Hantaviridae

    Arenaviridae Astroviridae Filoviridae Flaviviridae Hantaviridae

    Hantaviridae 0.7 Filoviridae 0.6 Picornaviridae 0.3 Wenling red spikefish hantavirus Rhinovirus C Ahab virus * Possum enterovirus * Aronnax virus * * Wenling minipizza batfish hantavirus Wenling filefish filovirus Norway rat hunnivirus * Wenling yellow goosefish hantavirus Starbuck virus * * Porcine teschovirus European mole nova virus Human Marburg marburgvirus Mosavirus Asturias virus * * * Tortoise picornavirus Egyptian fruit bat Marburg marburgvirus Banded bullfrog picornavirus * Spanish mole uluguru virus Human Sudan ebolavirus * Black spectacled toad picornavirus * Kilimanjaro virus * * * Crab-eating macaque reston ebolavirus Equine rhinitis A virus Imjin virus * Foot and mouth disease virus Dode virus * Angolan free-tailed bat bombali ebolavirus * * Human cosavirus E Seoul orthohantavirus Little free-tailed bat bombali ebolavirus * African bat icavirus A Tigray hantavirus Human Zaire ebolavirus * Saffold virus * Human choclo virus *Little collared fruit bat ebolavirus Peleg virus * Eastern red scorpionfish picornavirus * Reed vole hantavirus Human bundibugyo ebolavirus * * Isla vista hantavirus * Seal picornavirus Human Tai forest ebolavirus Chicken orivirus Paramyxoviridae 0.4 * Duck picornavirus Hepadnaviridae 0.4 Bildad virus Ned virus Tiger rockfish hepatitis B virus Western African lungfish picornavirus * Pacific spadenose shark paramyxovirus * European eel hepatitis B virus Bluegill picornavirus Nemo virus * Carp picornavirus * African cichlid hepatitis B virus Triplecross lizardfish paramyxovirus * * Fathead minnow picornavirus
  • A BEHAVIORAL STUDY of the HAWAIIAN GOBY-SHRIMP RELATIONSHIP and the EFFECTS of Predanon on the SYSTEM

    A BEHAVIORAL STUDY of the HAWAIIAN GOBY-SHRIMP RELATIONSHIP and the EFFECTS of Predanon on the SYSTEM

    A BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF THE HAWAIIAN GOBY-SHRIMP RELATIONSHIP AND THE EFFECTS OF PREDAnON ON THE SYSTEM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ZOOLOGY AUGUST 2005 By Robert Paul Nelson Thesis Committee: Jim Parrish Julie Bailey-Brock Tim Tricas Acknowledgments: I'd like to thank first and foremost my advisor Dr. J.D. Parrish for all his help in organizing and funding the project and reviewing my manuscript. Thanks to my committee members, Dr. Tim Tricas and Dr. Julie Bailey-Brock. Dr. Andrew Thompson helped in reviewing the manuscript. Mahalo to Casey Kaneshiro, Tyler Bouland and Rami Huiguas for collecting most of the daily rhythm cycle data. I also wish to express thanks for help from Georgi Kinsela, Jan Dierking, Katja Wunderbar, and Jeff Whitehurst. 111 Abstract The belief that the relationship between certain gobies and snapping shrimp (Alpheidae) is mutualistic typically includes the assumption that predation is a selective force driving the co-evolution of the relationship. In this study, I first showed the importance of the Hawaiian shrimp goby (Psilogobius mainlandi) to the sheltering behavior of its associated alpheid shrimp. Shrimp spent 53.6 ± 21.8 percent oflight hours in the day outside burrows with gobies present, but only 6.9 ± 3.4 percent ofthe time outside without gobies present. I then examined effects of predation by experimentally excluding predators on gobies from several I.S-m square plots and observing the subsequent density and size of gobies.
  • Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Alpheidae) from Japan, Associated with the Innkeeper Worm Ikedosoma Elegans (Annelida: Echiura: Echiuridae)

    Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Alpheidae) from Japan, Associated with the Innkeeper Worm Ikedosoma Elegans (Annelida: Echiura: Echiuridae)

    Zootaxa 4058 (1): 101–111 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4058.1.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:605E2A8F-6CC5-4037-90C7-BA3AE70F8ED6 A new species of the snapping shrimp genus Alpheus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Alpheidae) from Japan, associated with the innkeeper worm Ikedosoma elegans (Annelida: Echiura: Echiuridae) TOMOYUKI KOMAI Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, 955-2 Aoba-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8682 Japan. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species of the snapping shrimp genus Alpheus Fabricius, 1798, Alpheus ikedosoma, is described and illustrated on the basis of material from Boso Peninsula and Ariake Sea, Japan. All examined specimens were extracted with the help of a bait suction pump from burrows of innkeeper worm (Annelida: Echiura), constructed on easily accessible intertidal sand beaches or sand flats. The host worm from Boso Peninsula was identified as Ikedosoma elegans (Ikeda, 1904) (Echi- uridae). The new species is tentatively referred to the A. brevirostris (Olivier, 1811) species group, but it is characteristic in having several unusual features for the group, such as the very short rostrum without dorsal ridge, the absence of adros- tral grooves on the carapace, the strongly reduced dorsolateral spines on the telson, the unarmed antennal basicerite, the non-elongate, almost glabrous major chela, and the lack of movable spines or spinules on ventromesial margin of each cheliped merus. The new species represents the sixth species of Alpheus associated with echiuran burrows.
  • Evidence to Support Safe Return to Clinical Practice by Oral Health Professionals in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Repo

    Evidence to Support Safe Return to Clinical Practice by Oral Health Professionals in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Repo

    Evidence to support safe return to clinical practice by oral health professionals in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: A report prepared for the Office of the Chief Dental Officer of Canada. November 2020 update This evidence synthesis was prepared for the Office of the Chief Dental Officer, based on a comprehensive review under contract by the following: Paul Allison, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University Raphael Freitas de Souza, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University Lilian Aboud, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University Martin Morris, Library, McGill University November 30th, 2020 1 Contents Page Introduction 3 Project goal and specific objectives 3 Methods used to identify and include relevant literature 4 Report structure 5 Summary of update report 5 Report results a) Which patients are at greater risk of the consequences of COVID-19 and so 7 consideration should be given to delaying elective in-person oral health care? b) What are the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 that oral health professionals 9 should screen for prior to providing in-person health care? c) What evidence exists to support patient scheduling, waiting and other non- treatment management measures for in-person oral health care? 10 d) What evidence exists to support the use of various forms of personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing in-person oral health care? 13 e) What evidence exists to support the decontamination and re-use of PPE? 15 f) What evidence exists concerning the provision of aerosol-generating 16 procedures (AGP) as part of in-person