A P A EO P LE ’ S H ISTORY
FOR A PEOPLE’S HISTORY
T
H for the E C L A SSROOM CLASSROOM
A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM A people’s pedagogy, like a people’s history, should not be one long story of brutality and exploitation. Activities in this guide alert students to deep currents of justice and equality in U.S. history, and in diverse ways encourage students to try on the personas of people who worked to make this a more democratic society. A people’s history and pedagogy ought to allow students to recognize that “we” were not necessarily the ones stealing land, dropping bombs or breaking strikes. “We” were ending slavery, fighting for women’s rights, organizing unions, marching against wars, and trying to create a society premised on the Golden Rule.
— from the Introduction to A People’s History for the Classroom
“I can think of no better way to excite young people about the history of our country than to introduce them to the teaching activities in A People’s History for the Classroom.”
— Howard Zinn, author of A People’s History of the United States B ILL B
THE ZINN EDUCATION PROJECT I G
is a collaboration between Rethinking Schools and Teaching for Change ELO
Rethinking Schools Teaching for Change W 1001 E. Keefe Avenue P.O. Box 73038 Bill Bigelow Milwaukee, WI 53212 Washington, DC 20056 800-669-4192 800-763-9131 www.rethinkingschools.org www.teachingforchange.org THE ZINN EDUCATION PROJECT
$12.95 A collaboration between Rethinking Schools and Teaching for Change A People’s History for the Classroom
Bill Bigelow
The Zinn Education Project A collaboration between Rethinking Schools and Teaching for Change A People’s History for the Classroom by Bill Bigelow
A Rethinking Schools Publication
Rethinking Schools, Ltd., is a nonprofit educational publisher of books, booklets, and a quarterly magazine on school reform, with a focus on issues of equity and social justice. To request additional copies of this book or a catalog of other publications, or to subscribe to Rethinking Schools magazine, contact: Rethinking Schools 1001 East Keefe Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212 800-669-4192 www.rethinkingschools.org
Teaching for Change provides teachers and parents the tools to transform schools into socially equitable centers of learning. Its resources include professional development, publications, and a catalog of progressive teaching materials. For more information or a copy of the Teaching for Change catalog, contact: Teaching for Change P.O. Box 73038 Washington, D.C. 20056 800-763-9131 www.teachingforchange.org
© 2008 Rethinking Schools, Ltd. First edition
Cover Design: MJ Karp Book Design: Kate Hawley Proofreading: Jennifer Morales Business Manager: Mike Trokan Front cover photo: Lawrence Strike, 1912, © Brown Brothers, Sterling PA Back cover photo: Anti-lynching protest, NYC, 1917, © Underwood & Underwood, NY. Library of Congress.
All rights reserved. Except as permitted below, no part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including electronic, without the express prior written permission of the publisher, except for brief quotation in an acknowledged review. Individuals may photocopy excerpts from this book for use in educational settings (physical settings only; internet use is not permitted), as long as such material is furnished free to students or workshop participants. For sale of any portion of this book as part of course packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center for permissions and appropriate fees. If you have any questions, contact Rethinking Schools at the address above.
ISBN: 978-0-942961-39-3 Table of Contents
Preface v
Introduction: A People’s History, A People’s Pedagogy 1
Why Students Should Study History: An Interview with Howard Zinn 8
Discovering Columbus 15
The People vs. Columbus, et al. 21
U.S.-Mexico War Tea Party 29
“We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God” by Howard Zinn 39
Unsung Heroes by Howard Zinn 51
Teaching About Unsung Heroes 54
Lawrence, 1912: The Singing Strike 63
Rethinking the Teaching of the Vietnam War 81
“A School Year Like No Other”— Eyes on the Prize: “Fighting Back: 1957-1962” 89
Whose “Terrorism”? 97
About the Authors 109
iii
Preface
IN LATE 2007, A FORMER BOSTON UNIVER- packets nationally to middle and high school SITY student watched You Can’t Be Neutral on a teachers, while supplies last. A dedicated webpage, Moving Train, the film about the life of historian, www.ZinnEdProject.org, provides additional rec- professor, and activist Howard Zinn. He recalled ommended resources and ongoing updates about attending Professor Zinn’s remarkable lectures the project and its impact. The film and book at BU in the 1970s, and marveled at how Zinn’s are also commercially available, and additional “people’s history” was so much more alive and copies of the teaching guide can be downloaded accurate than the traditional history he’d received for free from the website or ordered from either in high school. Rethinking Schools or Teaching for Change. Now, after a successful career in technology, A note about this teaching guide. As explained he wanted to contribute to bringing Zinn’s work in the introduction, the activities included here to a new generation of students. So he contacted are designed to offer curriculum ideas to comple- Howard Zinn who put him in touch with Rethink- ment Howard Zinn’s history. Some of the arti- ing Schools and Teaching for Change, both non- cles and lessons—most of which first appeared profit organizations, each with over 20 years of in Rethinking Schools magazine or books—are experience in providing social justice resources pegged directly to Zinn’s work; others deal with and professional development for pre-K-12 class- themes and episodes that Zinn addresses. This room teachers and teacher educators. guide is a sampler. Many more “people’s history” “I’d prefer to remain anonymous,” he told curriculum books are available from Rethinking us. “This is not about me; it’s about getting Schools and Teaching for Change. Howard Zinn’s work into the hands of as many Some 30 years after his exposure to Howard teachers as possible.” Zinn’s approach to history, the former Boston So with the generous support of this anony- University student who triggered this project mous donor, Rethinking Schools and Teaching demonstrates that classroom experience can for Change have partnered to produce and offer have a lifelong impact. We believe that through a unique educational packet, which includes the taking a more engaging and more honest look DVD You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train, at the past, we can help equip students with about Howard Zinn’s life; Howard Zinn’s classic the analytical tools to make sense of—and text, A People’s History of the United States; and improve—the world today. a teaching guide, assembled especially for this —Rethinking Schools and project. We are promoting and distributing the Teaching for Change
v
Introduction: A People’s History, A People’s Pedagogy
THE LAST TIME HOWARD ZINN CAME TO people matter—that history ought to focus on speak in Portland, Ore., where I’ve taught high those who too often receive only token attention school history since 1978, hundreds of people (workers, women, people of color), and also on packed the auditorium to hear him. Those unable how people’s actions, individually and collectively, to find seats stood throughout the hall; others sat shaped our society. And it’s a people’s history in on the floor or crowded onto the stage. Hundreds that it’s a perspective on the past that is usable more were turned away, unable to squeeze in. A today, that can instruct and inspire and caution as colleague at my high school said, only half in jest, we try to make the world a better place. that it was one of the saddest days of his life, not Contrast Zinn’s approach with a traditional being able to get in to hear Howard Zinn. textbook history. As anyone who has ever cracked Something unusual is going on when a histo- a history textbook can affirm, they’re boring. The rian draws crowds like a rock star. prose reads like words and ideas have first been Unusual, but not surprising. Zinn’s people’s run through a blender. Passionless, story-poor, the history is passionate, probing, and partisan. Zinn books feign Objectivity. There is a lot of “us,” and begins from the premise that the lives of ordinary “we,” and “our,” as if the texts are trying to dissolve Jordin Isip
1 race, class, and gender realities into the melting students to the long antiwar and anti-imperialist pot of “the nation.” Indeed, the books have titles traditions in our country’s history? And with so like The Rise of the American Nation, embracing much conversation about “protecting our bor- a curricular manifest destiny where all history led ders,” isn’t it biased not to explore where those gloriously (or by about page 700, tediously) to Us. borders came from in the first place? Zinn’s writing presents no such illusions. In In the first chapter of A People’s History of the fact, the title of his autobiography (and the film United States, Zinn notes how so much history- distributed by the Zinn Education Project) insists: telling concentrates on those at the top—the presi- You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train. Societies dents and diplomats, the generals and industrialists. are dynamic, conflict-ridden, with power played It’s a winner’s history, and implicitly tells students: out in every aspect of life. Historians cannot Pay attention to the victors and disregard the rest. remain outside or “above” these struggles, Zinn Zinn flips the script, as the kids say. He writes that, argues. None of us can. Our lives, our occupations, “I prefer to try to tell the story of the discovery our consumer choices—and, yes, how we tell his- of America from the viewpoint of the Arawaks, tory—all take sides, and help move the world in of the Constitution from the standpoint of the one direction or another. slaves, of Andrew Jackson as seen “Anyone reading history by the Cherokees, of the Civil War should understand from the start as seen by the New York Irish, of the that there is no such thing as Mexican War as seen by the desert- impartial history,” Zinn writes in ing soldiers of Scott’s army, of the a book of essays, Declarations of rise of industrialism as seen by the Independence. “All written history young women in the Lowell textile is partial in two senses. It is partial mills, of the Spanish-American war in that it is only a tiny part of what as seen by the Cubans, the conquest really happened. That is a limita- of the Philippines as seen by the tion that can never be overcome. black soldiers on Luzon, the Gilded And it is partial in that it inevitably Age as seen by southern farmers, the takes sides, by what it includes or First World War as seen by social- omits, what it emphasizes or deem- ists, the Second World War as seen phasizes. It may do this openly or by pacifists, the New Deal as seen by deceptively, consciously or subconsciously.” blacks in Harlem, the postwar American empire as The textbooks most of us have read as stu- seen by peons in Latin America.” dents or have been assigned to teach throughout This from-the-grassroots, people’s history is our careers do not acknowledge their biases. As grounded in Zinn’s own experiences: “Before I Zinn suggests, the authors may even be unaware became a professional historian, I had grown up in of them. The most recent history textbook I was the dirt and dankness of New York tenements, had assigned in Portland, American Odyssey (Glencoe) been knocked unconscious by a policeman while describes the U.S. War with Mexico in two bland holding a banner in a demonstration, had worked paragraphs, out of its 1,010 pages (see p. 49). It for three years in a shipyard, and had participated never mentions widespread U.S. opposition to the in the violence of war.” war at the time. It was during this war that Henry But Zinn’s approach to history is not simply a David Thoreau went to jail and coined the term personal preference based on his own experiences. “civil disobedience,” in defense of his refusal to pay When we look at history from the standpoint of taxes to support U.S. aggression against Mexico. the workers and not just the owners, the soldiers Today, as the United States wages two wars in for- and not just the generals, the invaded and not eign lands and engages in military actions in many just the invaders, we can begin to see society more more, isn’t a textbook biased when it fails to alert fully, more accurately. So often, history books
2 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM describe a flattened world of “U.S. interests” and this happened, like dominoes lined up and falling. generic Americans. As Zinn writes, “Nations Social changes can seem almost inevitable. Laid are not communities and never have been. The out in neatly sequenced chapters, textbooks pres- history of any country, presented as the history ent social reality as if it were unfolding rather than of a family, conceals fierce conflicts of interest being created by people. As Zinn writes in his auto- (sometimes exploding, most often repressed) biography: “Everything in history once it has hap- between conquerors and conquered, masters and pened looks as if it had to happen exactly that way. slaves, capitalists and workers, dominators and We can’t imagine any other. But I am convinced dominated in race and sex.” Zinn recognizes that of the uncertainty of history, of the possibility of we live with the consequences of these fierce con- surprise, of the importance of human action in flicts of interest today. Thus the more clearly we changing what looks unchangeable.” see the past, the more clearly we’ll see the pres- Zinn proposes history as a series of choices ent—and be equipped to improve it. and turning points—junctures at which ordi- None of this is to argue for a history nary people interpreted social conditions and that exaggerates the crimes of the power- took actions that made a difference. This is a ful, inflates the heroism of “the people,” or powerful and hopeful insight that can not only invents victories for social help our students think about movements. But history- A people’s history the present, but can empower writing that begins with a belief them to act on it. What we in the possibility of a funda- can instruct and inspire think and how we act can make mentally egalitarian society will and caution as we try the world a better place. For necessarily make alternative to make the world teachers, our challenge is how selections from our nation’s to bring this insight alive in past. Zinn’s commitments and a better place. our classrooms—not just telling work in civil rights and peace students this, but showing them. movements have led him to Role plays are one teaching propose that history be put to the service of work- strategy that can bring history-making to life in ing and teaching for a better world. History is the classroom. Role plays ask students to attempt about and for human beings. to imagine themselves in the circumstances of Commitment and justice, critique and hope. other individuals throughout history and to con- It seems to me that it’s all of this that draws peo- sider the choices that actual groups faced. ple—and especially teachers—to Howard Zinn’s For example, because of the enormity of scholarship. I know that early in my career, this is slavery, it may appear to students that its aboli- what drew me to Zinn’s work. tion was foreordained. But this misses the signifi- cance of the social movement that sought to end A People’s Pedagogy slavery, its difficult choices, and the breadth of A people’s history requires a people’s pedagogy resistance, beginning especially with the enslaved to match. The activities included in this booklet themselves, that ultimately brought slavery down. are not a chapter-by-chapter guide to Zinn’s I ask my students how many of them—were A People’s History of the United States. Instead, they transported to, say, 1850, with their current they feature teaching strategies that illustrate awareness intact—would have opposed slavery. how a people’s history can be brought to life in Of course, they all raise their hands. Then I ask, the classroom. “What would you have done about it?” Not so A fundamental problem with traditional his- many hands raised. In a role play, I ask all my stu- tory and with traditional history teaching is that dents to portray members of the American Anti- it can appear that each event leads inexorably to Slavery Society, a key abolitionist organization. the next: this happened then this happened then In role, they confront dilemmas that anti-slavery
INTRODUCTION: A PEOPLE’S HISTORY, A PEOPLE’S PEDAGOGY 3 organizers also encountered: Would they have traditional approaches to history—including maintained a singular focus on slavery in the their own textbooks. In one article included here, South or would they have spent their energies also I describe how I introduce my classes to the opposing racism in the North? Would they have problematic notion of Columbus’s “discovery of supported the Seneca Falls gathering by women’s America”: I steal a student’s purse (see p. 15). I rights advocates, many of them abolitionists, or do do everything I can to get students to agree with they think this would have divided the movement? me that “Nomika’s” purse is in fact my purse: I How would they have confronted the 1850 Fugi- demonstrate that I control it; I take items out and tive Slave Act? Would they have supported John claim them (Nomika has been alerted in advance, Brown with money and weapons? None of these but other students don’t know that), and I insist are easy strategic questions and as students debate that it is my purse. When I lose this argument with these they can more easily recognize that, in fact, the class, I offer to “recast the act of purse acqui- people do make history. Choices sition,” and tell students that are made in circumstances not I didn’t steal Nomika’s purse, of their making, but nonetheless Zinn begins from the I discovered it. Now it’s mine, how people analyze and decide premise that the lives of right? Students readily see the to act within those circumstances ordinary people shoddiness of the claim. “So,” influences the course of events. I ask them, “if I didn’t discover The Bread and Roses Strike matter—that history Nomika’s purse, then why do role play, included in this guide, ought to focus on those some people say that Columbus is structured similarly, and who too often receive discovered America? What are puts students in the position of some other terms that we could Industrial Workers of the World only token attention use to describe his actions?” (IWW) organizers in Lawrence, (workers, women, He stole America; he took it; Mass., in 1912, who attempt to people of color), and he ripped it off; he invaded it. unite over 20,000 immigrant In a five- or ten-minute simu- workers, speaking dozens of lan- also on how people’s lation, students can begin to guages, for wage increases and actions, individually see what Howard Zinn argues better conditions—for “bread.” throughout his work: that how But they also seek “roses.” It’s a and collectively, shaped we frame the past invariably strike about dignity. Ultimately, our society. takes sides. And when we use organizers hope to “win” work- terms like “discovery”—or even ers’ commitment to a more the seemingly more neutral democratic society and non-exploitative eco- “encounter”—our language sides with the ones nomic system. Here, too, students experience who came out on top. classroom doses of the actual historical partici- Because the combination of a people’s history pants’ confusion, frustration, but also solidarity. with a people’s pedagogy may bump up against And, here too, there was no inevitability about students’ prior notions of what ought to happen the outcome, as students readily grasp from the in a history class, it’s helpful to engage students difficulty of the choices they confront in their role in comparisons that call into question traditional as IWW organizers. Role plays like this one and approaches. For example, one activity included on the Abolition movement are components of a here is “The U.S.-Mexican War Tea Party (p. 29),” pedagogy that does not merely tell students that pegged to Chapter 8 of A People’s History of the people make history, but seeks to let them live United States, “We Take Nothing By Conquest, that insight in the classroom. Thank God.” This was the war that resulted in Another piece of a “people’s pedagogy” is that Mexico ceding about half its country to the United it should engage students in explicitly critiquing States, including California, Arizona, New Mexico,
4 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM and Texas. In the “tea party” role play, students Southerners, Northerners, and Mexico (as in: assume the personas of 21 individuals, all of whom “Mexico was outraged …”). had some connection to the U.S. war with Mexico I ask students to read their textbook’s “War (1846-1848): the abolitionist Frederick Douglass with Mexico” section and to reflect in writing on opposed the war because he saw it as an attempt the adequacy of the book’s treatment, what’s left to add more slave territory to the United States; out, and whether or not they think it makes any Jefferson Davis, of Mississippi, too, saw this as difference that this is all some students will learn an issue of slavery—expanding his “freedom” to about the war with Mexico. After the tea party take his slaves wherever he wanted; María Josefa and reading Zinn’s chapter, students offer a rich Martínez, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, feared los- critique of their textbook. Not only do students ing her land and rights, that were protected more readily note the missing perspectives, they also under Mexican law than under U.S. law; Sergeant spot things that are less obvious. As Katie said in John Riley, originally of Ireland, deserted the U.S. our discussion, “We’re not asked to think about Army, where he and other immigrants received whether or not the war is right.” Another student wretched treatment, and joined the Mexicans to noted how the passage desensitizes readers to form the Saint Patrick’s Battal- the meaning of war: “It doesn’t ion; Col. Ethan Allan Hitchcock even look at it as a war—it’s a of the U.S. Army saw the war as situation.” In fact, despite the an attempt to steal huge swaths When we use terms like section’s title, “War with Mex- of Mexico, and wrote that “My “discovery”—or even ico,” the first paragraph ends heart is not in this war,” but as the seemingly more with May 1846 and the second a military officer was pledged paragraph begins with Febru- to carry out his orders; and the neutral “encounter”— ary 2, 1848, entirely skipping Apache leader, Cochise, con- our language sides the war itself. Another student demns both the U.S. and Mex- with the ones who underlined how the book says ico as thieves, fighting amongst that the Treaty of Guadalupe themselves for land that doesn’t came out on top. Hidalgo “gave the United States belong to either of them. Por- vast new regions …”: “‘Gave.’ traying these and 15 others, stu- This makes it sound all legal.” dents meet one another to find An activity like this allows individuals who support the war, oppose the war, students to see how much richer and more accu- stand to lose or gain from the war, and who have rate a “people’s history” is than the traditional opinions on why the war was fought. approach, as exemplified by their textbook. A The activity, which takes about a class people’s history (and a people’s pedagogy) doesn’t period, exposes students to a much more diverse silence the perspectives of the elites, it simply range of perspectives on the war than they’d includes more voices in the conversation. And a find in any textbook. But I don’t want students people’s pedagogy offers students a different, more to take my word for that; I want to “argue” for participatory, relationship to text. The traditional this kind of historical and pedagogical approach curriculum treats students as word consumers: by allowing them to compare it to their own read this and answer the questions at the end of textbook: Glencoe’s American Odyssey, men- the chapter. A more critical approach encour- tioned earlier. Whereas in the tea party, students ages students to “talk back” to text, to read for encountered over 20 different perspectives on the silences and the neglected perspectives, to ask the war—Mexican, U.S., men, women, pro-war, why certain choices were made (for example, why anti-war, pro-slavery, abolitionist, wealthy, poor, the text included no mention of the large num- white, black, Native American, soldier, civilian— bers of Mexico war opponents), and to imagine their book includes three perspectives: white what a more adequate treatment would be. In this
INTRODUCTION: A PEOPLE’S HISTORY, A PEOPLE’S PEDAGOGY 5 respect, reading is a metaphor: when we ask stu- attack.” (The media watchdog group Fairness dents to evaluate text material for biases, implicitly and Accuracy in Reporting calls this the “we we” we’re inviting them to evaluate the larger society phenomenon.) This is not a liberal-conservative for biases. A people’s pedagogy seeks to nurture thing; the most liberal commentators adopt this active citizens, rather than consumers. linguistic practice of conflating our interests with In his article, “Unsung Heroes,” included those of the elites. in this teaching guide (p. 51), Howard Zinn No wonder then, that when students begin acknowledges that once we begin to teach a fuller, to see the reality behind corporate and govern- more honest history, we also begin to surface the ment policies, they may take this personally and exploitation and brutality that has often been become discouraged or defensive. But a people’s glossed over in the traditional history curricu- pedagogy, like a people’s history, should not lum. Zinn writes: “A high school student recently be one long story of brutality and exploitation. confronted me: ‘I read in your book A People’s Several activities in this guide alert students to History of the United States about the massacres deep currents of justice and equality in U.S. of Indians, the long history of racism, the per- history, and in diverse ways encourage students sistence of poverty in the richest country in the to try on the personas of people who worked to world, the senseless wars. How can I keep from make this a more democratic society. A people’s being thoroughly alienated and depressed?’” history and pedagogy ought to allow students This disillusion that we’re confronted with to recognize that “we” were not necessarily the is magnified because so much traditional history ones stealing land, dropping bombs, or breaking manipulates students to see the policies of the strikes. “We” were ending slavery, fighting for U.S. government as our policies. Of course, it’s women’s rights, organizing unions, marching not just textbooks that lead us to identify with against wars, and trying to create a society pre- government and military actions. Here’s Barbara mised on the Golden Rule. Walters anchoring ABC News during the first The article in this teaching guide that fol- Gulf War: “How does this change our strategy? lows Zinn’s “Unsung Heroes,” “Teaching Unsung This means we can’t bomb; it means we have to Heroes,” also begins with a tea party that intro- be very careful about the areas we attack, if we do duces students to over 30 individuals in U.S. AP Images/Reed Saxon United Farm Workers leader César Chávez addresses union supporters in Los Angeles in 1976.
6 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM history who worked for “racial and gender jus- what the world—was going through. One passage tice.” Students portray some well-known activ- that we turned to was the concluding paragraphs ists like Rosa Parks and César Chávez, and of Zinn’s autobiography, You Can’t Be Neutral on some less well-known activists like Harvey Milk, a Moving Train. It’s about life, but it’s also about Fred Korematsu, and Elaine Brown. Students-as- what we need to strive for in our curricula: activists search out individuals who “spent time “To be hopeful in bad times is not just fool- in jail for their activities or beliefs,” “worked for ishly romantic. It is based on the fact that human women’s rights, workers’ rights, or for the rights history is a history not only of cruelty, but also of of gays and lesbians,” and “worked against slav- compassion, sacrifice, courage, kindness. ery or other forms of racism.” They find people “What we choose to emphasize in this com- who rejected violence on principle and others plex history will determine our lives. If we see only (like John Brown) who saw violence as the only the worst, it destroys our capacity to do something. way to stop a much greater violence. And from If we remember those times and places—and there this initial tea party they choose individuals are so many—where people have behaved mag- to research and write about imaginatively—in nificently, this gives us the energy to act, and at story, dialogue, or interior monologue. I include least the possibility of sending this spinning top of some examples from student papers in “Teaching a world in a different direction. Unsung Heroes.” “And if we do act, in however small a way, we One of the remarkable things about How- don’t have to wait for some grand utopian future. ard Zinn’s scholarship is his capacity to narrate The future is an infinite succession of presents, stories that are often unbelievably horrific and and to live now as we think human beings should yet never lose sight of the goodness that courses live, in defiance of all that is bad around us, is itself through human experience. Zinn’s history is a marvelous victory.” both more honest than traditional histories but I see Howard Zinn’s work as an invitation to also more hopeful. us all to join our classrooms to that “infinite suc- In the wake of September 11th, Rethinking cession of presents”—to see our work with stu- Schools editors searched for writing that could dents not only in terms of teaching academic skills, help us make sense out of what our society—and but also in terms of building a just society. ■ © Flip Schulke/CORBIS Civil rights activists march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge, Montgomery, Ala., March 9, 1965.
INTRODUCTION: A PEOPLE’S HISTORY, A PEOPLE’S PEDAGOGY 7 Why Students Should Study History An Interview with Howard Zinn
The following is condensed from an interview with problem that all nations have, their nationalistic Howard Zinn. He was interviewed in 1994 by focus on their own history, and it goes to absurd Barbara Miner of Rethinking Schools magazine. lengths. Some states in this country even require a yearlong course in the history of that state. Why should students study history? But even if you are willing to see the United I started studying history with States in relation to world his- one view in mind: to look for tory, you face the problem answers to the issues and prob- that we have not looked at lems I saw in the world about the world in an equitable way. me. By the time I went to col- We have concentrated on the lege I had worked in a shipyard, Western world, in fact on had been in the Air Force, had Western Europe. I remember been in a war. I came to history coming into my first class in asking questions about war and Spelman College in Atlanta peace, about wealth and pov- in 1956 and finding that erty, about racial division. there was no required course Sure, there’s a certain inter- in black history, or Asian or est in inspecting the past and African history, but there was it can be fun, sort of like a a required course in the his- detective story. I can make an tory of England. And there on argument for knowledge for its the board was this chart of the own sake as something that can Tudors and the Stuarts, the add to your life. But while that’s Roslyn Zinn dynasties of England. good, it is small in relation to the very large objec- For the United States, emphasis has been tive of trying to understand and do something particularly glaring in terms of Latin America, about the issues that face us in the world today. which is that part of the world closest to us and Students should be encouraged to go into with which we’ve had the most to do economi- history in order to come out of it, and should be cally and politically. discouraged from going into history and getting Another glaring problem has been the lost in it, as some historians do. emphasis in teaching American history through the eyes of the important and powerful peo- What do you see as some of the major problems ple, through the presidents, the Congress, the in how U.S. history has been taught in this Supreme Court, the generals, the industrialists. country? History textbooks don’t say, “We are going to One major problem has been the intense focus on tell the story of the Mexican War from the stand- U.S. history in isolation from the world. This is a point of the generals,” but when they tell us it
8 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM was a great military victory, that’s exactly what How did they feel about having 40 percent of their they are doing. territory taken away from them as a result of the war? How did they view the incident that Presi- Taking that as an example, if one were to have dent Polk used as a reason for the beginning of the a more inclusive view of the war with Mexico, war? Did it look real or manufactured to them? what would be some of the themes and perspec- You’d also have to talk about the people in the tives one would include? United States who protested against the war. That The Mexican War is an example of how one would be the time to bring up Henry Thoreau and event raises so many issues. You’d have to see the his essay, “Civil Disobedience.” war first of all as more than a military action. So You’d have to look at Congress and how it often the history of war is dominated by the story behaved. You’d have to look at Abraham Lincoln, of battles, and this is a way of diverting attention who was in the House of Representatives during from the political factors behind a war. It’s pos- the Mexican War. You’d learn a lot about politi- sible to concentrate upon the battles of the Mexi- cians and politics because you’d see that Abraham can War and just to talk about the triumphant Lincoln on the one hand spoke up against the march into Mexico City, and not talk about the war, but on the other hand voted to give money relationship of the Mexican War to slavery and to finance the war. This is so important because to the acquisition of territories which might pos- this is something that is repeated again and again sibly be slave territories. in American history: the feeble Another thing that is neglected opposition in Congress to presi- in the Mexican War is the view- dential wars, and then the voting point of the ordinary soldiers. The So often the history of funds for whatever war the soldiers who had volunteered for of war is dominated President has initiated. the Mexican War—you didn’t need a draft because so many by the story of battles, How do you prevent history les- people in the working classes were and this is a way of sons from becoming a recitation of dates and battles and Con- so destitute that they would join diverting attention the military on the promise of gresspersons and presidents? a little bit of pay and muster- from the political You can take any incident in ing-out money and a little bit factors behind a war. American history and enrich it of prestige—the volunteers went and find parallels with today. One into it not really knowing the important thing is not to con- bloodshed it would involve. And centrate on chronological order, then so many of them deserted. but to go back and forth and find For example, seven regiments of General Winfield similarities and analogies. Scott deserted on the road to Mexico City. You should ask students if anything in a par- You should tell the story of the Massachusetts ticular historical event reminds them of something volunteers who went into the Mexican War. Half they read in the newspapers or see on television of them died, and the half who returned were about the world today. When you press students invited to a homecoming party and when a com- to make connections, to abstract from the unique- manding officer got up to address the gathering, ness of a particular historical event and find some- they booed him off the platform. thing it has in common with another event—then I think it’s a good idea also to do something history becomes alive, not just past but present. which isn’t done anywhere so far as I know in his- And, of course, you must raise the controver- tories in any country, and that is: tell the story of sial questions and ask students, “Was it right for the war from the standpoint of the other side, of us to take Mexican territory? Should we be proud “the enemy.” To tell the story of the Mexican War of that; should we celebrate that?” History teach- from the standpoint of the Mexicans means to ask: ers often think they must avoid judgments of right
WHY STUDENTS SHOULD STUDY HISTORY 9 and wrong because, after all, those are matters of a feeling that they as citizens are the most impor- subjective opinions, those are issues on which stu- tant actors in history. dents will disagree and teachers will disagree. Students, for example, should learn that dur- But it’s the areas of disagreement that are the ing the Depression there were strikes and dem- most important. Questions of right and wrong onstrations all over the country. And it was that and justice are exactly the questions that should be turmoil and protest that created the atmosphere raised all the time. When students are asked, “Is in which Roosevelt and Congress passed Social this right; is this wrong?” then it becomes inter- Security and unemployment insurance and hous- esting, then they can have a debate—especially if ing subsidies and so on. they learn that there’s no simple, absolute, agreed- upon, universal answer. It’s not like giving them How can teachers foster critical thinking so that multiple-choice questions where they are right students don’t merely memorize a new, albeit or wrong. I think that’s a tremendous advance in more progressive, set of facts? their understanding of what education is. Substituting one indoctrination for another is a Teachers must also address the problem that danger and it’s very hard to deal with. After all, people have been miseducated to become depen- the teacher, no matter how hard she or he tries, is dent on government, to think that their supreme the dominant figure in the classroom and has the act as citizens is to go to the polls and vote every power of authority and of grades. It’s easy for the two years or four years. That’s where the history of teacher to fall into the trap of bullying students social movements comes in. Teachers should dwell into accepting one set of facts or ideas. It takes on Shay’s Rebellion, on colonial rebellions, on the hard work and delicate dealings with students to abolitionist movement, on the populist move- overcome that. ment, on the labor movement, and so on, and The way I’ve tried to deal with that problem make sure these social movements don’t get lost in is to make it clear to the students that when we the overall story of presidents and Congresses and study history we are dealing with controversial Supreme Courts. Emphasizing social and protest issues with no one, absolute, god-like answer. movements in the making of history gives students And that I, as a teacher, have my opinion and they AP Images/Bill Hudson
Police escort a group of black children to jail in Birmingham, Ala. on May 4, 1963. They were among the more than 900 children arrested for protesting the city’s segregation laws.
10 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM can have their opinions, and that I, as a teacher, choose; I don’t think they’re both valid. But you will try to present as much information as I don’t have to agree with me.” I want them to know can but that I may leave out information. I try that if people don’t take a stand the world will to make them understand that while there are remain unchanged, and who wants that? experts on facts, on little things, on the big issues, on the controversies and the issues of right and Are there specific ways that teachers can foster wrong and justice, there are no experts, and their an anti-racist perspective? opinion is as good as mine. To a great extent, this moral objective is not con- sidered in teaching history. I think people have But how do you then foster a sense of justice to be given the facts of slavery, the facts of racial and avoid the trap of relativity that, “Well, some segregation, the facts of government complicity in people say this and some people say that”? racial segregation, the facts of the fight for equality. I find such relativity especially true on the college But that is not enough. level, where there’s a great tendency to indeci- I think students need to be aroused emotion- siveness. People are unwilling to take a stand on ally on the issue of equality. They have to try to a moral issue because, well, there’s this side and feel what it was like, to be a slave, to be jammed there’s that side. into slave ships, to be separated from your fam- I deal with this by example. I never simply pres- ily. Novels, poems, autobiographies, memoirs, the ent both sides and leave it at that. I take a stand. reminiscences of ex-slaves, the letters that slaves If I’m dealing with Columbus, I say, look, there wrote, the writings of Frederick Douglass—I think are these people who say that we shouldn’t judge they have to be introduced as much as possible. Columbus by the standards of the 20th century. Students should learn the words of people them- But my view is that basic moral standards are not selves, to feel their anger, their indignation. different for the 20th century or the 15th century. In general, I don’t think there has been enough I don’t simply lay history out on a platter and use of literature in history. People should read say, “I don’t care what you choose; they’re both Richard Wright’s Black Boy; they should read the valid.” I let them know, “No, I care what you poems of Countee Cullen; they should read the © JP Laffont/Sygma/CORBIS Feminists march on August 26, 1970, the 50th anniversary of women’s suffrage, in a nationwide “strike for equality” called by the National Organization for Women.
WHY STUDENTS SHOULD STUDY HISTORY 11 novels of Alice Walker, the poems of Langston I think the issue of class and class conflict needs to Hughes, Lorraine Hansbury’s A Raisin in the Sun. be addressed more honestly because it is ignored These writings have an emotional impact that in traditional nationalist history. This is true not can’t be found in an ordinary recitation of history. just of the United States but of other countries. It is especially important that students learn Nationhood is a cover for extreme conflicts about the relationship of the United States govern- among classes in society, in our country, from its ment to slavery and race. founding, from the making of the Constitution. It’s very easy to fall into the view that slavery Too often, there’s a tendency to overlook these and racial segregation were a Southern problem. conflicts, and concentrate on the creation of a The federal government is very often exempted national identity. from re sponsibility for the problem, and is presented How does a teacher as a benign force help- deal with the inter- ing black people on the section of race, class, road to equality. In our and gender in terms time, students are taught of U.S. history, in how Eisenhower sent his particular that the troops to Little Rock, white working class Ark., and Kennedy sent has often been com- troops to Oxford, Miss., plicit, consciously and Congress passed civil or unconsciously, rights laws. in some very unfor- Yet the federal gov- givable actions? ernment is very often an The complicity of poor obstacle to resolving those white people in rac- problems of race, and ism, the complicity of when it enters it comes in males in sexism, is a late in the picture. Abra- Picket sign from a protest in 1941 during a time of very important issue. It heightened labor unrest, when Walt Disney fired ham Lincoln was not the union organizers on his art staff. seems to me that com- initiator of the movement plicity can’t be under- against slavery but a follower of a movement stood without showing that had developed for 30 years by the time he the intense hardships that poor white people became president in 1861; it was the antislavery faced in this country, making it easier for them movement that was the major force creating the to look for scapegoats for their condition. You atmosphere in which emancipation took place have to recognize the problems of white work- following the Civil War. And it was the presi- ing people in order to understand why they turn dent and Congress and the Supreme Court that racist, because they aren’t born racist. ignored the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments When discussing the Civil War, teachers after they were passed. In the 1960s it wasn’t should point out that only a small percentage of Johnson and Kennedy who were the leaders and the white population of the South owned slaves. initiators of the movement for race equality, but The rest of the white population was poor and it was black people. they were driven to support slavery and to be racist by the messages of those who controlled In addition to focusing on social movements society—that they would be better off if the and having a more consciously anti-racist per- Negroes were put in a lower position, and that spective, what are some other thematic ways those calling for black equality were threatening in which the teaching of history must change? the lives of these ordinary white people.
12 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM In the history of labor struggles, you should greatest victims, but have prevented whites and show how blacks and whites were used against blacks from getting together to bring about the one another, how white workers would go social change that would benefit them all. Showing out on strike and then black people, desperate the self-interest is also important in order to avoid themselves for jobs, would be brought in to the patronizing view of feeling sorry for someone, replace the white workers, how all-white craft of giving somebody equality because you feel unions excluded black workers, and how all this guilty about what has been done to them. creates murderously intense racial antagonisms. At the same time, to approach the issue merely So the class and race issues are very much inter- on the basis of self-interest would be wrong, twined, as is the gender issue. because people should learn to empathize with One of the ways of giving some satisfaction other people even where there is no visible, imme- to men who are themselves exploited is to make diate self-interest. them masters in their own household. So they may be humiliated on the job, but In response to concerns about they come back home and humili- multiculturalism, there’s more ate their wives and their children. lip service to include events and There’s a wonderful short story Questions of right and perspectives affecting women by a black woman writer, Ann wrong and justice are and people of color. But often it’s presented as more facts Petry, “Like a Winding Sheet” exactly the questions that should be required reading and people to learn, without in school. It’s about a black man that should be raised any fundamental change in who is humiliated on the job and all the time. perspective. What would be the comes home and, on the flimsi- approach of a truly anti-racist, est of reasons, beats his wife. The multicultural perspective in story is told in such a way as to U.S. history? make you really understand the I’ve noticed this problem in some pent-up anger that explodes inside a family as a of the new textbooks, which obviously are try- result of what happens out in the world. In all ing to respond to the need for a multicultural these instances of racial and sexual mistreatment, approach. What I find is a bland eclecticism where it is important for students to understand that the everything has equal weight. You add more facts; roots of such hostility are social, environmental, you add more continents; you add more cultures; situational, and are not an inevitability of human you add more people. But then it becomes a con- nature. It is also important to show how these fusing melange in which you’ve added a lot of dif- antagonisms so divide people from one another ferent elements but without any real emphasis on as to make it difficult for them to solve their com- what had previously been omitted. You’re left with mon problems in united action. a kind of unemotional, cold combination salad. You need the equivalent of affirmative action How can you teach white students to take an in education. What affirmative action does is to anti-racist perspective that isn’t based merely say, look, things have been slanted one way for a on guilt over the things that white people have long time. We’re going to pay special attention to done to people of color? this person or to this group of people because they If such a perspective is based only on guilt, it have been left out for so long. doesn’t have a secure foundation. It has to be People ask me why in my book, A People’s His- based on empathy and on self-interest, on an tory of the United States, I did not simply take the understanding that the divisions between black things that I put in and add them to the orthodox and white have not just resulted in the exploita- approaches so, as they put it, the book would be tion of black people, even though they’ve been the better balanced. But there’s a way in which this
WHY STUDENTS SHOULD STUDY HISTORY 13 so-called balance leaves people nowhere, with no they have to photocopy parts of it themselves in moral sensibility, no firm convictions, no outrage, order to pass it out to the students; they have to no indignation, no energy to go anywhere. worry about parents complaining, about what I think it is important to pay special atten- the head of the department or the principal or tion to the history of black people, of Indians, of the school superintendent will say. women, in a way that highlights not only the facts But I still believe, based on a lot of contact but the emotional intensity of such issues. with high school teachers over the past few years, that while there’s a danger of becoming Is it possible for history to be objective? overly assertive and insensitive to how others Objectivity is neither possible nor desirable. might view you, the most common behavior It’s not possible because all history is subjec- is timidity. Teachers withdraw and use the real tive, all history represents a point of view. History fact of outside control as an excuse for teaching is always a selection from an infinite number of in the orthodox way. facts and everybody makes the selection differ- Teachers need to take risks. The problem ently, based on their values and what they think is is how to minimize those risks. One important important. Since it’s not possible to be objective, way is to make sure that you present material in you should be honest about that. class making it clear that it is subjective, that it is Objectivity is not desirable because if we want controversial, that you are not laying down the to have an effect on the world, we need to empha- law for students. Another important thing is to be size those things which will make students more extremely tolerant of students who disagree with active citizens and more moral people. your views, or students who express racist or sex- ist ideas. I don’t mean tolerant in the sense of not How can a progressive teacher promote a radi- challenging such ideas, but tolerant in the sense of cal perspective within a bureaucratic, conser- treating them as human beings. It’s important to vative institution? Teachers sometimes either develop a reputation that you don’t give kids poor push the limits so far that they alienate their grades on the basis of their disagreements with colleagues or get fired, or they’re so afraid that you. You need to create an atmosphere of freedom they tone down what they really think. How can in the classroom. a teacher resolve this dilemma? It’s also important to talk with other teachers The problem certainly exists on the college and to gain support and encouragement, to organize. university level—people want to get tenure; they Where there are teacher unions, those are logi- want to keep teaching; they want to get promoted; cal places for teachers to support and defend one they want to get salary raises; and so there are all another. Where there are not teacher unions, these economic punishments if they do some- teachers should always think how they can orga- thing that looks outlandish and radical and dif- nize and create a collective strength. ferent. But I’ve always believed that the main Teachers don’t always know where to get those problem with college and university teachers other perspectives. Do you have any tips? has been self-censorship. I suspect that the same The orthodox perspective is easy to get. But once thing is true in the high schools, although you teachers begin to look for other perspectives, once have to be more sympathetic with high school they start out on that road, they will quickly be led teachers because they operate in a much more from one thing to another to another. repressive atmosphere. I’ve seen again and again where college and university teachers don’t really So it’s not as daunting as people might think? have a problem in, for instance, using my People’s No. It’s all there. It’s in the library. ■ History in their classrooms, but high school This interview first appeared in the Rethinking Schools teachers always have a problem. They can’t get book, Rethinking Our Classrooms: Teaching for Equity and it officially adopted; they have to get permission; Justice, Vol. 1.
14 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM Discovering Columbus Re-reading the Past
MOST OF MY STUDENTS HAVE TROUBLE Different answers: “We saw you take it; that’s her with the idea that a book—especially a text- lipstick, we know you don’t wear lipstick; there book—can lie. That’s why I start my U.S. history is stuff in there with her name on it.” To get the class by stealing a student’s purse. point across, I even offer to help in their effort to As the year opens, my students may not prove Nikki’s possession: “If we had a test on the know when the Civil War was fought or what contents of the purse, who would do better, Nikki James Madison or Frederick Douglass did; but or I?” “Whose labor earned the money that bought they know that a brave fellow named Christo- the things in the purse, mine or Nikki’s?” Obvious pher Columbus discovered America. Indeed, questions, obvious answers. this bit of historical lore may be the only knowl- I make one last try to keep Nikki’s purse: edge class members share in common. “What if I said I discovered this purse, then would What students don’t know is that their it be mine?” A little laughter is my reward, but I textbooks have, by omission or otherwise, lied don’t get any takers; they still think the purse is to them. rightfully Nikki’s. “So,” I ask, “Why do we say that Columbus Finders, Keepers discovered America?” So I begin class by stealing a student’s purse. Was It Discovery? I announce that the purse is mine, obviously, because look who has it. Most students are fair- Now they begin to see what I’ve been leading up minded. They saw me take the purse off the desk to. I ask a series of questions that implicitly link so they protest: “That’s not yours, it’s Nikki’s. Nikki’s purse and the Indians’ land: Were there You took it. We saw you.” I brush these objec- people on the land before Columbus arrived? tions aside and reiterate that it is, too, mine and Who had been on the land longer, Columbus to prove it, I’ll show all the things I have inside. or the Indians? Who knew the land better? The I unzip the bag and remove a brush or a comb, students see where I’m going—it would be hard maybe a pair of dark glasses. A tube of lipstick not to. “And yet,” I continue, “what is the first works best: “This is my lipstick,” I say. “There, thing that Columbus did when he arrived in the that proves it is my purse.” They don’t buy it and, New World?” Right: he took possession of it. in fact, are mildly outraged that I would pry into After all, he had discovered the place. someone’s possessions with such utter disregard We talk about phrases other than “discov- for her privacy. (I’ve alerted the student to the ery” that textbooks could use to describe what demonstration before the class, but no one else Columbus did. Students start with phrases they knows that.) used to describe what I did to Nikki’s purse: He “OK, if it’s Nikki’s purse, how do you know? stole it; he took it; he ripped it off. And others: Why are you all so positive it’s not my purse?” He invaded it; he conquered it.
15 16th-century engraving of the cruelties to the Taínos, by Theodore de Bry.
I want students to see that the word “discov- He reports being enormously impressed by the ery” is loaded. The word itself carries a perspec- indigenous people: tive, a bias. “Discovery” represents the point of As soon ... as they see that they are safe and view of the supposed discoverers. It’s the invad- have laid aside all fear, they are very simple ers masking their theft. And when the word gets and honest and exceedingly liberal with all repeated in textbooks, those textbooks become, they have; none of them refusing anything he in the phrase of one historian, “the propaganda may possess when he is asked for it, but, on of the winners.” the contrary, inviting us to ask them. They To prepare students to examine textbooks exhibit great love toward all others in prefer- critically, we begin with alternative, and rather ence to themselves. They also give objects of unsentimental, explorations of Columbus’s great value for trifles, and content themselves “enterprise,” as he called it. The Admiral-to-be with very little or nothing in return ... I did was not sailing for mere adventure and to prove not find, as some of us had expected, any the world was round, as I learned in 4th grade, cannibals among them, but, on the contrary, but to secure the tremendous profits that were men of great deference and kindness. to be made by reaching the Indies. Mostly I want the class to think about the But, on an ominous note, Columbus writes human beings Columbus was to “discover”— in his log, “should your Majesties command it, and then destroy. I read from a letter Columbus all the inhabitants could be taken away to Cas- wrote to Lord Raphael Sanchez, treasurer of tile [Spain], or made slaves on the island. With Aragón and one of his patrons, dated March 14, 50 men we could subjugate them all and make 1493, following his return from the first voyage. them do whatever we want.”
16 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM I ask students if they remember from ele- Looking Through Different Eyes mentary school days what Columbus brought back from the Americas. Students recall that he Students and I role-play a scene from Colum- returned with parrots, plants, some gold, and a bus’s second voyage. Slavery is not producing few of the people Columbus had taken to calling the profits Columbus is seeking. He believes “Indians.” This was Columbus’s first expedi- there is gold and the Taíno people are selfishly tion and it is also where most school textbook holding out on him. ac counts of Columbus end—conveniently. Students play Columbus; I play the Taínos: But what about his second voyage? “Chris, we don’t have any gold, honest. Can we I read to them a passage from Hans Kon- go back to living our lives now and you can go ing’s book, Colum bus: His Enterprise: back to wherever you came from?” I call on several students to respond to the We are now in February 1495. Time was Taínos’ plea. Columbus thinks the Taínos are short for sending back a good “dividend” lying. Student responses range from sympa- on the supply ships getting ready for the thetic to ruthless: OK, we’ll go home; please return to Spain. Columbus therefore turned bring us your gold; we’ll lock you up in prison if to a massive slave raid as a means for filling you don’t bring us your gold; we’ll torture you up these ships. The [Columbus] brothers if you don’t fork it over, etc. rounded up 1,500 Arawaks [Taínos]—men, women, and children—and imprisoned “Discovery” represents them in pens in Isabela, guarded by men and dogs. The ships had room for no more the point of view of the than 500, and thus only the best specimens supposed discoverers. were loaded aboard. The Admiral then told It’s the invaders the Spaniards they could help themselves from the remainder to as many slaves as masking their theft. they wanted. Those whom no one chose were simply kicked out of their pens. Such After I’ve pleaded for a while and the stu- had been the terror of these prisoners that dents-as-Columbus have threatened, I read aloud (in the description by Michele de Cuneo, another passage from Koning’s book, describing one of the colonists) “they rushed in all Columbus’s system for extracting gold from the directions like lunatics, women dropping Taínos: and abandoning infants in the rush, run- ning for miles without stopping, fleeing Every man and woman, every boy or girl of across mountains and rivers.” fourteen or older, in the province of Cibao Of the 500 slaves, 300 arrived alive in ... had to collect gold for the Spaniards. As Spain, where they were put up for sale in their measure, the Spaniards used ... hawks’ Seville by Don Juan de Fonseca, the arch- bells. ... Every three months, every [Taíno] deacon of the town. “As naked as the day had to bring to one of the forts a hawks’ bell they were born,” the report of this excellent filled with gold dust. The chiefs had to bring churchman says, “but with no more embar- in about ten times that amount. In the other rassment than animals ...” provinces of Hispaniola, twenty-five pounds The slave trade immediately turned out of spun cotton took the place of gold. to be “unprofitable, for the slaves mostly Copper tokens were manufactured, and died.” Columbus decided to concentrate when a [Taíno] had brought his or her on gold, although he writes, “Let us in the tribute to an armed post, he or she received name of the Holy Trinity go on sending all such a token, stamped with the month, to be the slaves that can be sold.” hung around the neck. With that they were
DISCOVERING COLUMBUS 17 safe for another three months while collect- Re-examining Basic Truths ing more gold. Whoever was caught without a token was I ask students to find a textbook, preferably one killed by having his or her hands cut off ... they used in elementary school, and critique the There were no gold fields, and thus, once the book’s treatment of Columbus and the Taínos. I [Taínos] had handed in whatever they still distribute the following handout and review the had in gold ornaments, their only hope was questions aloud. I don’t want them to merely to work all day in the streams, washing out answer the questions, but to consider them as gold dust from the pebbles. It was an impos- guidelines. sible task, but those Taínos who tried to s (OW FACTUALLY ACCURATE WAS THE ACCOUNT flee into the mountains were systematically hunted down with dogs and killed, to set an s 7HAT WAS OMITTEDLEFT OUTTHAT IN YOUR example for the others to keep trying. ... judgment would be important for a full During those two years of the adminis- understanding of Columbus (for example, tration of the brothers Columbus, an esti- his treatment of the Taínos; slave-taking; his mated one half of the entire population of method of getting gold; the overall effect on Hispaniola was killed or killed themselves. the Taínos)? The estimates run from one hundred and s 7HAT MOTIVES DOES THE BOOK GIVE TO #OLUM- twenty-five thousand to one-half million. bus? Compare those with his real motives. The goal is not to titillate or stun, but to force s 7HO DOES THE BOOK GET YOU TO ROOT FOR AND the question: Why wasn’t I told this before? how is that accomplished? (For example, are the books horrified at the treatment of Taí- nos or thrilled that Columbus makes it to the so-called New World?) s (OW DO THE PUBLISHERS USE ILLUSTRATIONS What do these communicate about Columbus and his “enterprise”? s )N YOUR OPINION WHY DOES THE BOOK portray the Columbus/Taíno encounter the way it does? s #AN YOU THINK OF ANY GROUPS IN OUR SOCIETY who might have an interest in people having an inaccurate view of history?
I tell students that this last question is tough but crucial. Is the continual distortion of Colum- bus simply an accident, or are there social groups that benefit from children developing a false or limited understanding of the past? The assignment’s subtext is to teach students that all written material should be read skepti- cally. I want students to explore the politics of print—that perspectives on history and social reality underlie the written word, and that to Columbus kneels in pious glory in a typical children’s biography. read is both to comprehend what is written, but This one is James de Kay’s Meet Christopher Columbus. also to question why it is written. My intention
18 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM is not to encourage an “I-don’t-believe-any- or not, linking church and Columbus removes thing” cynicism, but rather to equip students to him still further from criticism. analyze a writer’s assumptions and determine what is and isn’t useful in any particular work. Students’ Conclusions Reading is a metaphor. How we encourage I give students a week before I ask them to students to approach written material reflects bring in their written critiques. Students share how we hope students will approach the world. their papers with one another in small groups. Will they be mere consumers of text—and the They note themes that recur in the papers and world—or will they feel empowered to question, any differences that emerge. Here are excerpts critique, and act? from some students’ papers in an 11th-grade lit- erature and U.S. history class that Linda Chris- tensen and I co-taught at Jefferson High School in Portland, Ore. “With 50 men we Matthew wrote: “As people read their evalua- could subjugate them tions the same situations in these textbooks came all and make them out. Things were conveniently left out so that you sided with Columbus’s quest to ‘boldly go where do whatever we want.” no man has gone before.’ ... None of the harsh — Christopher Columbus, 1492 violent reality is confronted in these so-called true accounts.” Gina tried to explain why the books were so consistently rosy:
For practice, we look at excerpts from a text- It seemed to me as if the publishers had just book, The Story of American Freedom (Macmil- printed up some “glory story” that was sup- lan, 1964). We read aloud and analyze several posed to make us feel more patriotic about paragraphs. The arrival of Columbus and crew is our country. In our group, we talked about especially revealing—and obnoxious. The reader the possibility of the government trying to watches the events from the Spaniards’ point of protect young students from such violence. view. We are told how Columbus and his men We soon decided that that was probably one “fell upon their knees and gave thanks to God,” a of the farthest things from their minds. They passage included in virtually all elementary school want us to look at our country as great, and accounts of Columbus. “He then took possession powerful, and forever right. They want us of it [the island] in the name of King Ferdinand to believe Columbus was a real hero. We’re and Queen Isabella of Spain.” The narrative does being fed lies. We don’t question the facts, not question Columbus’s right to assume con- we just absorb information that is handed to trol over a land that was already occupied. The us because we trust the role models that are account is so respectful of the Admiral that stu- handing it out. dents can’t help but sense it approves of what is, quite simply, an act of naked imperialism. Rebecca’s reflected the general tone of disillu- The book keeps us close to God and the sion with the textbooks: “Of course, the writers of Church throughout its narrative. Upon return- the books probably think it’s harmless enough— ing from the “New World”—new to whom?— what does it matter who discovered America, Columbus shows off his parrots and “Indians.” really; and besides, it makes them feel good about Immediately following the show, “the king and America. But the thought that I have been lied to queen lead the way to a near-by church. There a all my life about this, and who knows what else, song of praise and thanksgiving is sung.” Intended really makes me angry.”
DISCOVERING COLUMBUS 19 Why Do We Do This? to believe.” Josh was the most articulate in his skepticism. He had begun to “read” our class from The students’ written reflections became the basis the same critical distance from which we hoped for a class discussion. Repeatedly, students blasted students would approach textbooks: their textbooks for giving readers inadequate, and ultimately untruthful, understandings. While we I still wonder ... If we can’t believe what our didn’t press to arrive at definitive explanations first grade teachers told us, why should we for the omissions and distortions, we tried to believe you? If they lied to us, why wouldn’t underscore the contemporary abuses of histori- you? If one book is wrong, why isn’t another? cal ignorance. If the books wax romantic about What is your purpose in telling us about how Columbus planting the flag on island beaches awful Chris was? What interest do you have and taking possession of land occupied by naked in telling us the truth? What is it you want red-skinned Indians, what do young readers learn from us? from this about today’s world? That might—or wealth—makes right? That it’s justified to take These were wonderful questions. Linda and people’s land if you are more “civilized” or have a I responded by reading them (anonymously) to “better” religion? That white people have the right the entire class. We asked students to take a few to rule over people of color? minutes to write additional questions and com- ments on the Columbus activities or to imagine our response as teachers—what was the point of our lessons? Reading is a metaphor. How We hoped students would see that the intent was to present a new way of reading, and ulti- we encourage students to mately, of experiencing the world. Textbooks fill approach written material students with information masquerading as final reflects how we hope students truth and then ask students to parrot back the information in end-of-the-chapter “checkups.” will approach the world. We wanted to tell students that they shouldn’t necessarily trust the “authorities,” but instead need to participate in their learning, probing for unstated assumptions and unasked questions. Whatever the answers, the textbooks condi- Josh asked what our “interest” was in this tion students to accept inequality; nowhere do approach. It’s a vital question. Linda and I see they suggest that the Taínos were sovereign peo- teaching as political action: we want to equip ples with a right to control their own lands. And, students to build a truly democratic society. As if Columbus’s motives are mystified or ignored, Brazilian educator Paulo Freire once wrote, to then students are less apt to question U.S. involve- be an actor for social change one must “read the ments in, say, Central America or the Middle word and the world.” East. As Bobby, approaching his registration day We hope that if a student maintains a critical for the military draft, pointed out in class: “If distance from the written word, then it’s possible people thought they were going off to war to fight to maintain that same distance from one’s soci- for profits, maybe they wouldn’t fight as well, or ety: to stand back, look hard, and ask, “Why is it maybe they wouldn’t go.” like this? Who benefits and who suffers?” It’s important to note that some students are And finally: “How can I make it better?” ■ troubled by these myth-popping discussions. One This article first appeared in the Rethinking Schools book student wrote that she was “left not knowing who Rethinking Columbus, edited by Bill Bigelow and Bob Peterson.
20 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM TEACHINGH ANDOACTIVUITTY The People vs. Columbus, et al.
THIS ROLE PLAY BEGINS with the premise between one and three million; some estimates that a monstrous crime was committed in the are lower and some much higher. By 1550, very years after 1492, when perhaps as many as three few Taínos remained alive.) million or more Taínos on the island of His- Who—and/or what—was responsible for paniola lost their lives. (Most scholars estimate this slaughter? This is the question students the number of people on Hispaniola in 1492 at confront here.
Materials Needed: charges, and b) to explain who they think is guilty and why. s 3OME CONSTRUCTION PAPER SUITABLE FOR making name placards. One rule: They may plead guilty if they wish, but they cannot claim sole responsi- s #OLORED MARKERS bility; they must accuse at least one other defendant. At this point, students sometimes Time Required: protest that it’s ridiculous to charge the Taínos for their own deaths, or they may The time needed for this activity can vary consid- show some confusion about the “system of erably depending on the preparation and defenses empire.” Tell them not to worry, that it’s mounted by students. Teachers should allocate at your job as prosecutor to explain the charges. least two 50-minute periods for the role play. Each group will receive a written copy of the charges against them. Suggested Procedure: 3. Explain the order of the activity: 1. In preparation for class, list the names of a. In their groups, they will prepare a all the “defendants” on the board: Colum- defense against the charges contained in bus, Columbus’s men, King Ferdinand and the indictments. It’s a good idea for Queen Isabella, the Taínos, and the System of students to write these up, as they will be Empire. presenting these orally and may want to 2. Tell students that each of these defendants read a statement. is charged with murder—the murder of the b. Before the trial begins, you will choose Taíno Indians in the years following 1492. several students, who will be sworn to Tell them that, in groups, students will neutrality. These people will be the jury. portray the defendants and that you, the c. As prosecutor, you will begin by arguing teacher, will be the prosecutor. the guilt of a particular group. Explain that students’ responsibility will be d. Those in the group accused by the pros- twofold: a) to defend themselves against the ecutor will then defend themselves and
21 group to circle up gets first pick of who they’ll represent. Go around to each of the groups and distribute the appropriate “indictment” sheets. Remind students to read the indict- ment against them carefully and discuss pos- sible arguments in their defense. As they discuss, I wander from group to group, making sure students understand their responsibilities—at times playing devil’s advocate, at times helping them consider possible defenses. Also, at this point, I distribute a placard and marker to each group so that they can display which role they are portraying. Sometimes students want to see the indictments against the other groups. I encourage them to read these because it will help students develop additional argu- ments. Also, students may want to use other “evidence.” [See the first chapter of Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States and information included throughout the Rethinking Schools book Rethinking Columbus—for example, from will state who they believe is guilty and Columbus’s diary (p. 96), the timeline why. [One option is to require that each (p. 99), or the Taínos (p. 106).] group call at least one witness. For exam- ple, in one class, the group representing 5. When each group appears ready—after per- the King and Queen called one of the haps a half hour, depending on the class— Taínos to the stand and asked, “Have you choose a jury: one member from each group ever seen me before?” No. “Did I ever (in a big class), or a total of three students in kill any of your people?” No. “Did I ever a smaller class. Publicly swear them to neu- hurt any of your people?” No. “We have trality; they no longer represent the King and no further questions.”] Queen, the Taínos, or anyone else. 6. The order of prosecution is up to you. I pre- e. The jury will then question that group, fer: Columbus, Columbus’s men, the King and others may also question the group and Queen, the Taínos, and the System of and offer rebuttals. Empire. I save the System for last as it’s the f. This process is repeated until all the most difficult to prosecute, and depends on groups have been accused and have having heard the other groups’ presentations. defended themselves. The jury will then As mentioned, the teacher argues the indict- decide guilt and innocence. ment for each group, the group defends, the 4. Ask students to count off into five groups of jury questions, and other groups may then roughly equal numbers. To get things mov- question. Then, the process repeats itself for ing quickly, I like to tell students that the first each indictment. The written indictments
22 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM should be an adequate outline for prosecu- tion, but I always feel free to embellish. 7. After each group has been charged and has made its defense, I ask the jury to step out of the classroom and deliberate. They can assign “percentage guilt,” e.g., one party is 25 per- cent guilty, another 60 percent, etc. They also need to offer clear explanations for why they decided as they did. As they deliberate, I ask the rest of the class to step out of their roles and to do in writing the same thing the jury is doing. 8. The jury returns and explains its verdict and then we discuss. Here are some questions and issues to raise: s 7AS ANYONE ENTIRELY NOT GUILTY $ID THE prosecutor convince you that the Taínos were in part responsible for their own deaths? s 7HY didn’t the Taínos kill Columbus on his first voyage? s (OW DID YOU WEIGH RESPONSIBILITY between the “bosses” and the men they s 7HAT MORE WOULD YOU NEED TO KNOW hired? about the System of Empire to under- stand how it affected people’s thinking s #AN YOU IMAGINE A PEACEFUL MEETING and behavior? between Europeans and Taínos? Or did European life—the “System of s )F THE 3YSTEM OF %MPIRE IS GUILTY WHAT Empire”—make violence inevitable? should be the “sentence”? You can’t put a How would Spain and other European system in prison. ■ countries have had to be different to have made a more peaceful outcome This role play first appeared in the Rethinking Schools possible? book Rethinking Columbus, edited by Bill Bigelow and Bob Peterson.
THE PEOPLE VS. COLUMBUS, ET AL. 23 HANDOUT Columbus
The Indictment: You are charged with the mistreatment and murder of thousands, perhaps millions, of Taíno Indians.
YOUR FIRST ACT IN THE LANDS you “discov- ered” was to take possession of another people’s territory in the name of an empire thousands of miles away. From the very beginning of your time in the Indies you kidnapped Taíno Indians. Even when they attempted to escape, making it clear that they wanted to leave, you refused to release them. Your journal shows that your only wish in the Indies was to find gold. The only reason you showed any kindness to the Taínos on your first trip was so they would agree to show you the source of their gold. On your second voyage to the Indies, you ordered your men to round up Taí- nos and had over 500 shipped to Spain as You ordered your men to spread slaves. You told your men to help them- “terror” among the Taínos when there selves to the remaining Taíno captives, was rumor of resistance. which they did. This act alone killed The list goes on. When you arrived on several hundred Taínos. Hispaniola there may have been as many In 1495 you started the policy of forc- as a million or even three million Taínos ing Taínos, age 14 and older, to collect on the island. According to one Spanish gold for you. Those who didn’t return priest, by 1542 there were 200 Taínos left. every three months with the amount of There is no one to blame but you. gold you demanded were punished by You were Admiral, you were Viceroy, having their hands chopped off. you were Governor of the island. ■
— from the role play, The People vs. Columbus, et al.
24 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM HANDOUT Columbus’s Men
The Indictment: You are charged with the mistreatment and murder of thousands, perhaps millions, of Taíno Indians.
WITHOUT YOU, COLUMBUS’S ORDERS to enslave and kill Taínos would have been empty words. There is no evidence that Colum- bus personally captured slaves or killed anyone with his own hands. You are the ones responsible for the enslavement of first hundreds, then thousands, of Taíno Indians. You did the dirty work. You raped women. You set dogs on infants. You cut the hands off Taínos who didn’t deliver enough gold. You whipped Taínos if they didn’t work hard enough in the mines. Without you there were no crimes. You may try to blame your superi- ors, Columbus or even King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella. But because someone orders you to commit a crime does not free you of the blame for committing it. Without the soldier there is no war. You could have said no. There were Span- Without you there would have been no iards, like the priests Antonio de Mon- genocide. ■ tesinos and Bartolomé de las Casas, who refused to mistreat Indians and spoke out — from the role play, The People vs. Columbus, et al. on their behalf. Why didn’t you?
COLUMBUS’S MEN 25 HANDOUT King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella The Indictment: You are charged with the mistreatment and murder of thousands, perhaps millions, of Taíno Indians.
WITHOUT YOUR MONEY, Columbus couldn’t anyway—but you never punished him for have launched his plan to find the East these crimes, which killed hundreds of Indies by sailing west. Without you, he was human beings. an unemployed sailor. Really, you didn’t care what Columbus You hired him to “discover” and claim did, so long as you got rich. At times, you new lands. Thus you are guilty of con- would order that the Taínos should be spiracy to steal the territory of people you treated humanely. But you took no action didn’t even know, who had never bothered to stop the Taínos from being forced to or harmed you. work in the mines. They were slaves in When Columbus returned after his everything but name. Had you wanted the first voyage with several Indian captives, cruelty to stop, you could have ordered and you rewarded him, you became guilty all your subjects home. But then you of kidnapping. You could have ordered wouldn’t have gotten any more gold. And Columbus to stop kidnapping Indians. that was what you wanted, right? You could have punished him for this Because Columbus was unpopular illegal act. By not doing anything to stop with other Spaniards, you replaced him Columbus and his men, you legalized as governor. But you never punished him every crime they committed. for the crimes committed against Taínos In his first letter to you, Columbus when he was governor. And these crimes wrote that the Indians would make excel- continued under the next governor. lent slaves. Right away, you could have Because you were the bosses and ordered him to take no slaves. You did because you paid the bills, you have more no such thing, and thus became accom- guilt than had you been the ones wielding plices in all future slave-taking. True, the swords and hangmen’s nooses. ■ after a while you discouraged Columbus from enslaving people—they mostly died, — from the role play, The People vs. Columbus, et al.
26 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM HANDOUT Taínos
The Indictment: You are charged with the mistreatment and murder of thousands, perhaps millions, of Taíno Indians.
WHILE YOU ARE THE VICTIMS of this crime, you are also guilty of committing it. You failed to fight back against the Spaniards. This meant that you brought the fate of slavery and death upon yourselves. From the very beginning you must have known what Columbus meant to do. He took Taíno captives from other islands and held them against their will. He claimed your land as his own. He was interested only in finding gold. When your people were cut by Spaniards’ swords, Columbus and his men showed no con- cern. All this you must have known. Tragically, you let this greedy, violent man get away, so he could return. On his next trip, however, he brought 17 ships and between 1,200 and 1,500 men, all heavily armed. You allowed, even invited, this invasion. Foolishly, your cacique (leader), Spaniards? Had Taínos worked together Caonabó, killed the 39 men Columbus they might have beaten the Spaniards even left behind. Why didn’t Caonabó and the after Columbus returned. After all, the Taínos kill all the Spaniards—including Spaniards numbered fewer than 2,000; Columbus—before they had a chance Taínos numbered in the hundreds of thou- to return to Spain? Imagine the differ- sands, possibly as many as three million. ent outcome had the Taínos been smart However, as a result of this Taíno fail- enough to stop Columbus before he could ure, all the Native peoples of the Americas launch the invasion. suffered. ■ Who knows why the Taínos of His- paniola did not unite to throw out all the — from the role play, The People vs. Columbus, et al.
TAÍNOS 27 HANDOUT The System of Empire
The Indictment: You are charged with the mistreatment and murder of thousands, perhaps millions, of Taíno Indians.
THIS GETS COMPLICATED. You are not a system saw only white Christians as full person, but a system. We like to blame human beings. crimes on people. But in this case, the It was life in a system that valued real criminal is not human. private property (especially gold), and True, Columbus’s men did the kill- approved of violence against foreigners ing, Columbus gave the orders and King and non-Christians to get it, that made Ferdinand and Queen Isabella paid the Columbus and his men enslave and kill. bills—and took the profits. But what Sane people do not kill hundreds of thou- made them behave the way they did? sands of other human beings. It was a Were they born evil and greedy? The rotten, insane system that led Columbus real blame lies with a system that values and the others to behave the way they did. property over people. You, as the representatives of this system, European society was organized so are guilty for the genocide committed that an individual had to own property against Taínos. to feel secure. The more property one As a final test to see who is guilty for owned, the more security, the more con- the mass murder of the Taínos, ask your- trol over one’s destiny. There was no self these questions: security without private ownership of s )F IT HAD BEEN SOME OTHER hEXPLORERv property. If you were poor, you could besides Columbus to “discover starve. The Taínos were not perfect, but America,” would he have let the Taí- they had no “poor” and no one starved. nos keep their land? Indians commented that Europeans’ love of gold was like a disease. In fact, this atti- s 7OULD HE NOT HAVE ENSLAVED PEOPLE tude was a product of a diseased system. s 7OULD HE NOT HAVE MADE THEM SEARCH In order to get more wealth, Colum- for gold and work in the mines? bus and his men took Taínos as slaves, terrorized them into searching out gold You know the answer: Any European and forced them to work on their farms conqueror would have been every bit and in their mines. They justified all this as bad as Columbus. Why? Because the by telling themselves that the Taínos system of empire was to blame, not any weren’t Christian, so “we” can control particular individual. ■ “their” land and labor. The European — from the role play, The People vs. Columbus, et al.
28 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM TEACHING ACTIVITY U.S.–Mexico War Tea Party: “We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God”
TODAY’S BORDER WITH MEXICO is the product about the line that separates the United States and of invasion and war. Grasping some of the motives Mexico. The tea party activity introduces students for that war and some of its immediate effects to a number of the individuals and themes they begins to provide students the kind of historical will encounter in Howard Zinn’s “We Take Noth- context that is crucial for thinking intelligently ing by Conquest, Thank God.”
Materials Needed: Suggested Procedure: s 4EA PARTY ROLES CUT UP /NE FOR EVERY 1. Explain to students that they are going to do student in the class. an activity about the U.S. war with Mexico, s "LANK NAMETAGS %NOUGH FOR EVERY 1846-1848. Distribute one tea party role to student in the class. each student in the class. There are only 21, so in most classes, some students will be s #OPIES OF h4HE 7AR WITH -EXICO assigned the same historical character. (Most Questions” for every student. but not all of the roles are based on individu- s #OPIES OF h7E 4AKE .OTHING BY #ONQUEST als included in Zinn’s “We Take Nothing by Thank God” for every student. Conquest, Thank God,” as the tea party is s #OPIES OF 53 -EXICO MAP P intended as a pre-reading activity. A couple s #OPIES OF THE STUDENT HANDOUT are drawn from the chapter, “Foreigners in “The War with Mexico.” Their Own Land: Manifest Destiny in the Southwest,” in Ronald Takaki’s A Different Time Required: Mirror; others are based on material in Mil- ton Meltzer’s Bound for the Rio Grande, Matt s /NE CLASS PERIOD FOR THE TEA PARTY 4IME S. Meier and Feliciano Rivera’s The Chicanos: for follow-up discussion. A History of Mexican Americans, Elizabeth s ! PORTION OF ONE CLASS PERIOD TO ASSIGN Martínez’s 500 Años del Pueblo Chicano/500 “We Take Nothing by Conquest, Years of Chicano History in Pictures, and Thank God,” and a portion of another Deena J. González’s “The Widowed Women to discuss. of Santa Fe: Assessments on the Lives of an Unmarried Population, 1850-1880” in s ! PORTION OF ONE CLASS PERIOD TO READ AND Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in critique “The War with Mexico” textbook U.S. Women’s History, Ellen Carol DuBois excerpt. and Vicki L. Ruiz, eds.)
29 2. Have students fill out their nametags, using s 7HAT WERE SOME OF THE DIFFERENT POINTS the name of the individual they are assigned. of view you found on why the United Tell students that in this activity you would States and Mexico went to war? like each of them to attempt to become these s 7HY DO YOU THINK THE 5NITED 3TATES AND people from history. Ask students to read Mexico went to war? their roles several times and to memorize as s 7HAT WERE SOME RESULTS OF THE WAR much of the information as possible. Encour- age them to underline key points. Sometimes s 7HAT QUESTIONS DOES THIS ACTIVITY LEAVE it helps if students turn over their roles and you with? list three or four facts about their characters that they think are most important. “We Take Nothing by Conquest, 3. Distribute a copy of “The War with Mexico: Thank God” Questions” to every student. Explain their assignment: Students should circulate 6. As follow-up, assign Howard Zinn’s “We through the classroom, meeting other indi- Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God” viduals from the U.S.-Mexico War. They and the U.S.-Mexico map (see p. 48). should use the questions on the sheet as a Another reading to consider using is Mil- guide to talk with others about the war and ton Meltzer’s chapter focusing on the U.S. to complete the questions as fully as pos- soldiers from Ireland who went over to sible. They must use a different individual to the Mexican side as the San Patricio Bat- answer each of the eight questions. (This is talion, “Traitors—or Martyrs,” from his not the Twilight Zone, so students who have book Bound for the Rio Grande. Similarly, been assigned the same person may not meet I’ve used the song, “San Patricio Brigade,” themselves.) Tell them that it’s not a race; included on New York Town, a CD by the the aim is for students to spend time hearing Irish-American rock group Black 47 to talk each other’s stories, not just hurriedly scrib- with students about the Irish resistance to bling down answers to the different ques- the war. Black 47 can at first-listen sound tions. I like to begin this activity by asking for odd, but my students seemed to enjoy hear- a student volunteer to demonstrate with me ing this raucous song about a “boy from the an encounter between two of the individuals, green fields of Galway.” A poignant song/ so that the rest of the class can sense the kind powerpoint is David Rovics’ “Saint Patrick’s of interaction I’m looking for. Battalion,” posted on YouTube. 4. Ask students to stand up and begin to circu- 7. Ask students to complete a “talk-back” late throughout the class to meet one another journal with the Zinn reading. They and to fill out responses on the U.S.-Mexico should locate at least five passages from War questions student handout. the reading that they found amusing, important, startling, moving, confusing, 5. Afterwards, ask students to share some of outrageous, or odd. They should write their findings with the whole class. This out each quote and their detailed reaction needn’t be exhaustive, as students will learn to it. You might ask students to find a lot more about these issues when they material that they can connect with read the excerpt from Howard Zinn’s A information they learned in the tea People’s History of the United States. party, events that relate somehow Possible questions: to their own lives or things going on today. s 7HAT SURPRISED YOU ABOUT THIS ACTIVITY Also encourage students to raise at least s 7HO FOUND SOMEONE WITH OPINIONS DIF- two questions that they would like to ferent than your character’s opinions? discuss with the rest of the class.
30 A PEOPLE’S HISTORY FOR THE CLASSROOM 8. In addition to students’ own questions, here s 7HY MIGHT ORDINARY CITIZENSWORKERS are some questions for further discussion or or farmers, with no slaves and no plans writing: to move onto Mexican territory—sup- s 7HY DID THE 5NITED 3TATES GOVERNMENT port the U.S. war against Mexico? Does want to obtain California? war itself hold attraction for people, or was it the Mexican War in particular that s 7HAT IS MEANT BY THE TERM -ANIFEST excited some Americans? Destiny? s !S WAS THE CASE WITH THE ORGANIZED OPPO- s 7HAT WERE THE PRESSURES ON THE 5NITED sition to Indian Removal in the 1820s States government to push for expansion? and 1830s, racism infected the movement s 7HAT IF YOU BELIEVED THE WAR WITH -EXICO against the war with Mexico. Give some was immoral, but both major parties, examples. Why do you think this racism Democratic and Whig, supported it? existed? What would you do to try to bring an end s )F THE 53 !RMY WAS SUPPOSED TO BRING to the war? liberty and civilization to Mexico, why do s 2E READ !BRAHAM ,INCOLNS QUOTE ON you think rape and mistreatment of p. 41. Lincoln believes that even though Mexicans was so widespread? Whigs opposed the war before it began, s 7HO BENEFITED FROM THE -EXICAN 7AR that once the war began they should allo- cate money to support the war. Explain Textbook Critique why you agree or disagree. s #OMMENT ON THE BELIEF OF SOME !MERI- Textbooks may have useful background information, cans: The Mexican War was a good thing, photos, maps, and graphs. But often they contain because it gave the blessings of liberty and biases and omissions. This activity asks students to democracy to more people. question how one major U.S. history textbook covers the U.S. war with Mexico. s )N WHAT WAYS COULD IT BE SAID THAT THE Mexican War was a racist war? Give 1. Distribute to students the selection from examples. Glencoe McGraw-Hill’s American Odyssey, s $ESCRIBE THE RESISTANCE TO THE WAR (OW a high school text, p. 49. Although the main effective was the opposition? focus of this 1,010-page textbook is the s &ROM