Holoprosencephaly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Holoprosencephaly Holoprosencephaly is a birth defect of the brain where the brain doesn’t divide into right and left sections, called hemispheres. This can What is it? affect the head and face. There are three main types of holoprosencephaly: • Alobar: Complete lack of division into right and left hemispheres of the brain. Babies with this type may also have a single eye, absent eyes, a very small eye, a flattened nose, and/or a cleft lip. This is the most severe type. • Semi-lobar: The left side of the brain is fused to the right side at the front and sides of the brain. Babies with this type can also have small eyes, one eye, a flattened bridge and tip of the nose, one nostril, a cleft lip, and/or a cleft palate. • Lobar: There is a right ventricle and a left ventricle, but the brain hemispheres are fused at the front. Babies also might have a cleft lip, closely spaced eyes, a depressed nose, or an almost normal-looking face. Babies with any type of holoprosencephaly also may have seizures, water on the brain, neural tube defects, pituitary dysfunction, short height, feeding problems, developmental delay, and intellectual disability. About 1 in every 16,000 babies is born with holoprosencephaly each How common is it? year. It is more common in stillbirths and miscarriages. The cause of holoprosencephaly is unknown. There may be many What causes it? factors that cause it. More research is needed to understand the exact cause. To confirm holoprosencephaly, imaging of the brain is done. During pregnancy, imaging can be done to look for birth defects and other How is it diagnosed? conditions. After birth, imaging can be done to see the brain, too. Treatment for babies with this condition varies based on the type of holoprosencephaly. Your child’s doctor will discuss appropriate How is it treated? treatment options with you. For more information: National Institutes of Health, Genetic and Rare Diseases https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/6665/holoprosencephal y#diseaseDiagnosisSection National Human Genome Research Institute https://www.genome.gov/12512735/learning-about- holoprosencephaly/ .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Ultrasound Evaluation of the Central Nervous System
Ultrasound Evaluation of the Ultrasound Evaluation of the Central Nervous System Central Nervous System ••CNSCNS malformations are the second most Mani Montazemi, RDMS frequent category of congenital anomaly, Director of Ultrasound Education & Quality Assurancee after congenital heart disease Baylor College of Medicine Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine ••PoorPoor timing of the examination, rather than Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Texas Children’s Hospital, Pavilion for Women poor sensitivity, can be an important factor Houston Texas & in failing to detect a CNS abnormality Clinical Instructor Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Radiology Department Fetal Head Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Fetal Head Central Nervous System Brain Development 9 -13 weeks Rhombencephalon 5th Menstrual Week •Gives rise to hindbrain •4th ventricle Arises from the posterior surface of the embryonic ectoderm Mesencephalon •Gives rise to midbrain A small groove is found along •Aqueduct the midline of the embryo and the edges of this groove fold over to form a neuro tube that Prosencephalon gives rise to the fetal spinal •Gives rise to forebrain rd cord and brain •Lateral & 3 ventricles Fetal Head Fetal Head Ventricular view Neural Tube Defects ••LateralLateral ventricles ••ChoroidChoroid plexus Group of malformations: Thalamic view • Anencephaly ••MidlineMidline falx •Anencephaly ••CavumCavum septiseptipellucidi pellucidi ••CephalocelesCephaloceles ••ThalamiThalami ••SpinaSpina bifida Cerebellar view ••CerebellumCerebellum ••CisternaCisterna magna Fetal
[Show full text]
A Anencephaly
Glossary of Birth Anomaly Terms: A Anencephaly: A deadly birth anomaly where most of the brain and skull did not form. Anomaly: Any part of the body or chromosomes that has an unusual or irregular structure. Aortic valve stenosis: The aortic valve controls the flow of blood from the left ventricle of the heart to the aorta, which takes the blood to the rest of the body. If there is stenosis of this valve, the valve has space for blood to flow through, but it is too narrow. Atresia: Lack of an opening where there should be one. Atrial septal defect: An opening in the wall (septum) that separates the left and right top chambers (atria) of the heart. A hole can vary in size and may close on its own or may require surgery. Atrioventricular septal defect (endocardial cushion defect): A defect in both the lower portion of the atrial septum and the upper portion of the ventricular septum. Together, these defects make a large opening (canal) in the middle part of the heart. Aniridia (an-i-rid-e-a): An eye anomaly where the colored part of the eye (called the iris) is partly or totally missing. It usually affects both eyes. Other parts of the eye can also be formed incorrectly. The effects on children’s ability to see can range from mild problems to blindness. To learn more about aniridia, go to the U.S. National Library of Medicine website. Anophthalmia/microphthalmia (an-oph-thal-mia/mi-croph-thal-mia): Birth anomalies of the eyes. In anophthalmia, a baby is born without one or both eyes.
[Show full text]
Pushing the Limits of Prenatal Ultrasound: a Case of Dorsal Dermal Sinus Associated with an Overt Arnold–Chiari Malformation and a 3Q Duplication
reproductive medicine Case Report Pushing the Limits of Prenatal Ultrasound: A Case of Dorsal Dermal Sinus Associated with an Overt Arnold–Chiari Malformation and a 3q Duplication Olivier Leroij 1, Lennart Van der Veeken 2,*, Bettina Blaumeiser 3 and Katrien Janssens 3 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium 3 Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital and University of Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; [email protected] (B.B.); [email protected] (K.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: We present a case of a fetus with cranial abnormalities typical of open spina bifida but with an intact spine shown on both ultrasound and fetal MRI. Expert ultrasound examination revealed a very small tract between the spine and the skin, and a postmortem examination confirmed the diagnosis of a dorsal dermal sinus. Genetic analysis found a mosaic 3q23q27 duplication in the form of a marker chromosome. This case emphasizes that meticulous prenatal ultrasound examination has the potential to diagnose even closed subtypes of neural tube defects. Furthermore, with cerebral anomalies suggesting a spina bifida, other imaging techniques together with genetic tests and measurement of alpha-fetoprotein in the amniotic fluid should be performed. Citation: Leroij, O.; Van der Veeken, Keywords: dorsal dermal sinus; Arnold–Chiari anomaly; 3q23q27 duplication; mosaic; marker chro- L.; Blaumeiser, B.; Janssens, K. mosome Pushing the Limits of Prenatal Ultrasound: A Case of Dorsal Dermal Sinus Associated with an Overt Arnold–Chiari Malformation and a 3q 1.
[Show full text]
CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES of the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM Christopher Verity, Helen Firth, Charles Ffrench-Constant *I3
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.74.suppl_1.i3 on 1 March 2003. Downloaded from CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM Christopher Verity, Helen Firth, Charles ffrench-Constant *i3 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74(Suppl I):i3–i8 dvances in genetics and molecular biology have led to a better understanding of the control of central nervous system (CNS) development. It is possible to classify CNS abnormalities Aaccording to the developmental stages at which they occur, as is shown below. The careful assessment of patients with these abnormalities is important in order to provide an accurate prog- nosis and genetic counselling. c NORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CNS Before we review the various abnormalities that can affect the CNS, a brief overview of the normal development of the CNS is appropriate. c Induction—After development of the three cell layers of the early embryo (ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm), the underlying mesoderm (the “inducer”) sends signals to a region of the ecto- derm (the “induced tissue”), instructing it to develop into neural tissue. c Neural tube formation—The neural ectoderm folds to form a tube, which runs for most of the length of the embryo. c Regionalisation and specification—Specification of different regions and individual cells within the neural tube occurs in both the rostral/caudal and dorsal/ventral axis. The three basic regions of copyright. the CNS (forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain) develop at the rostral end of the tube, with the spinal cord more caudally. Within the developing spinal cord specification of the different popu- lations of neural precursors (neural crest, sensory neurones, interneurones, glial cells, and motor neurones) is observed in progressively more ventral locations.
[Show full text]
Supratentorial Brain Malformations
Supratentorial Brain Malformations Edward Yang, MD PhD Department of Radiology Boston Children’s Hospital 1 May 2015/ SPR 2015 Disclosures: Consultant, Corticometrics LLC Objectives 1) Review major steps in the morphogenesis of the supratentorial brain. 2) Categorize patterns of malformation that result from failure in these steps. 3) Discuss particular imaging features that assist in recognition of these malformations. 4) Reference some of the genetic bases for these malformations to be discussed in greater detail later in the session. Overview I. Schematic overview of brain development II. Abnormalities of hemispheric cleavage III. Commissural (Callosal) abnormalities IV. Migrational abnormalities - Gray matter heterotopia - Pachygyria/Lissencephaly - Focal cortical dysplasia - Transpial migration - Polymicrogyria V. Global abnormalities in size (proliferation) VI. Fetal Life and Myelination Considerations I. Schematic Overview of Brain Development Embryology Top Mid-sagittal Top Mid-sagittal Closed Neural Tube (4 weeks) Corpus Callosum Callosum Formation Genu ! Splenium Cerebral Hemisphere (11-20 weeks) Hemispheric Cleavage (4-6 weeks) Neuronal Migration Ventricular/Subventricular Zones Ventricle ! Cortex (8-24 weeks) Neuronal Precursor Generation (Proliferation) (6-16 weeks) Embryology From ten Donkelaar Clinical Neuroembryology 2010 4mo 6mo 8mo term II. Abnormalities of Hemispheric Cleavage Holoprosencephaly (HPE) Top Mid-sagittal Imaging features: Incomplete hemispheric separation + 1)1) No septum pellucidum in any HPEs Closed Neural
[Show full text]
Surveillance for Anencephaly and Spina Bifida and the Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis —United States, 1985–1994
August 25, 1995 / Vol. 44 / No. SS-4 CDC Surveillance Summaries Surveillance for Anencephaly and Spina Bifida and the Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis —United States, 1985–1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Atlanta, Georgia 30333 The MMWR series of publications is published by the Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Public Health Service, U.S. Depart- ment of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30333. SUGGESTED CITATION General: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Surveillance Sum- maries, August 25, 1995. MMWR 1995;44(No. SS-4). Specific: [Author(s)]. [Title of particular article]. In: CDC Surveillance Sum- maries, August 25, 1995. MMWR 1995;44(No. SS-4):[inclusive page numbers]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .......................... David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D. Director The production of this report as an MMWR serial publication was coordinated in: Epidemiology Program Office.................................... Stephen B. Thacker, M.D., M.Sc. Director Richard A. Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Editor, MMWR Series Scott F. Wetterhall, M.D., M.P.H. Associate Editor, CDC Surveillance Summaries Scientific Information and Communications Program CDC Surveillance Summaries ...................................... Suzanne M. Hewitt, M.P.A. Managing Editor Rachel J. Wilson Ava W. Navin, M.A. Project Editors Peter M. Jenkins Visual Information Specialist Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Public Health Service or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Copies can be purchased from Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
[Show full text]
Massachusetts Birth Defects 2011-2012
Massachusetts Birth Defects 2011-2012 Massachusetts Birth Defects Monitoring Program Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition Massachusetts Department of Public Health May 2016 Charles D. Baker, Governor Karyn E. Polito, Lieutenant Governor Marylou Sudders, Secretary, Executive Office of Health and Human Services Monica Bharel, MD, MPH, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Public Health Ron Benham, Director, Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Acting Director, Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention Acknowledgements This report was prepared by Rebecca Liberman and Cathleen Higgins, Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention. We would like to thank the Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention staff who contributed to this report, including: Marlene Anderka, Xiaoli Chen, Dominique Heinke, Angela Lin, and Gerlinde Munshi. Data in this report have been collected through the efforts of Center field staff, including: Roberta Aucoin, Mitcheka Jalali, Washa Liu, Daniel Sexton, Lori Tetrault and Ashley Tracey. We would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for their time and commitment in supporting the Center: Lewis Holmes, MD, MassGeneral Hospital for Children Carol Louik, ScD, Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Allen Mitchell, MD, Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Martha Werler, ScD, Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health Ed Doherty, March of Dimes Massachusetts Chapter Massachusetts Registry of
[Show full text]
Prenatal Diagnosis, Phenotypic and Obstetric Characteristics of Holoprosencephaly
Fetal Diagn Ther 2005;20:161–166 Received: August 6, 2003 DOI: 10.1159/000083897 Accepted after revision: January 15, 2004 Prenatal Diagnosis, Phenotypic and Obstetric Characteristics of Holoprosencephaly Ga´ bor J. Joo´ Artu´ r Beke Csaba Papp Erno˝To´ th-Pa´ l Zsanett Szigeti Zolta´nBa´ n Zolta´ n Papp Semmelweis University Medical School I., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Budapest, Hungary Key Words Introduction Holoprosencephaly W Prenataldiagnosis W Patient’s history W Accompanying malformations In the early weeks of embryonic development, the brain consists of three parts: prosencephalon, mesenceph- alon, rhombencephalon. Between the time of neural tube Abstract closure and the 5th gestational week, the prosencephalon The diagnosis of fetal malformations, especially those of gives origin to telencephalon (cerebral hemispheres) and the central nervous system, is strikingly important in the diencephalon (thalamus and hypothalamus), the mesen- practice of genetic counseling. Early diagnosis is very cephalon forms the midbrain and rhombencephalon de- significant, not only because of the prognosis, but also velops into metencephalon (pons and cerebellum) and because of the emotional effects caused by the accompa- myelencephalon (medulla oblongata). At the time of the nying craniofacial malformations. The summary of the telencephalon/diencephalon differentiation, the prosen- obstetrical and diagnostical characteristics should be cephalon also splits longitudinally – the hemispheres de- useful in the management of holoprosencephaly. The velop on the lateral aspects of the longitudinal cerebral analysis of the 50 cases we encountered between 1981 fissure by progressive enlargement and hollowing of the and 2000, including the anatomical, diagnostic and clini- cerebral vesicles. Should the prechordal mesoderm fail to cal aspects, as well as the associated craniofacial malfor- migrate normally [1, 2], the prosencephalon remains un- mations, forms the essence of our publication.
[Show full text]
Version 1.0, 8/21/2016 Zika Pregnancy Outcome Reporting Of
Version 1.0, 8/21/2016 Zika Pregnancy outcome reporting of brain abnormalities and other adverse outcomes The following box details the inclusion criteria for brain abnormalities and other adverse outcomes potentially related to Zika virus infection during pregnancy. All pregnancy outcomes are monitored, but weekly reporting of adverse outcomes is limited to those meeting the below criteria. All prenatal and postnatal adverse outcomes are reported for both Zika Pregnancy Registries (US Zika Pregnancy Registry, Zika Active Pregnancy Surveillance System) and Active Birth Defects Surveillance; however, case finding methods dictate some differences in specific case definitions. Brain abnormalities with and without microcephaly Confirmed or possible congenital microcephaly# Intracranial calcifications Cerebral atrophy Abnormal cortical formation (e.g., polymicrogyria, lissencephaly, pachygyria, schizencephaly, gray matter heterotopia) Corpus callosum abnormalities Cerebellar abnormalities Porencephaly Hydranencephaly Ventriculomegaly / hydrocephaly (excluding “mild” ventriculomegaly without other brain abnormalities) Fetal brain disruption sequence (collapsed skull, overlapping sutures, prominent occipital bone, scalp rugae) Other major brain abnormalities, including intraventricular hemorrhage in utero (excluding post‐natal IVH) Early brain malformations, eye abnormalities, or consequences of central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction Neural tube defects (NTD) o Anencephaly / Acrania o Encephalocele o Spina bifida Holoprosencephaly
[Show full text]
Congenital Anomalies of the Nose
133 Congenital Anomalies of the Nose Jamie L. Funamura, MD1 Travis T. Tollefson, MD, MPH, FACS2 1 Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Address for correspondence Travis T. Tollefson, MD, MPH, FACS, Facial Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology- 2 Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, Davis, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis, 2521 Stockton Sacramento, California Blvd., Suite 7200, Sacramento, CA 95817 (e-mail: [email protected]). Facial Plast Surg 2016;32:133–141. Abstract Congenital anomalies of the nose range from complete aplasia of the nose to duplications and nasal masses. Nasal development is the result of a complex embryo- logic patterning and fusion of multiple primordial structures. Loss of signaling proteins or failure of migration or proliferation can result in structural anomalies with signiﬁcant Keywords cosmetic and functional consequences. Congenital anomalies of the nose can be ► nasal deformities categorized into four broad categories: (1) aplastic or hypoplastic, (2) hyperplastic or ► nasal dermoid duplications, (3) clefts, and (4) nasal masses. Our knowledge of the embryologic origin ► Tessier cleft of these anomalies helps dictate subsequent work-up for associated conditions, and the ► nasal cleft appropriate treatment or surgical approach to manage newborns and children with ► nasal hemangioma these anomalies. – Congenital anomalies of the nose are thought to be relatively side1 4 (►Fig. 1A, B). The medial processes will ultimately fuse, rare, affecting approximately 1 in every 20,000 to 40,000 live contributing to the nasal septum and the medial crura of the births.1 The exact incidence is difﬁcult to quantify, as minor lower lateral cartilages.
[Show full text]
Chapter III: Case Definition
NBDPN Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance rev. 06/04 Appendix 3.5 Case Inclusion Guidance for Potentially Zika-related Birth Defects Appendix 3.5 A3.5-1 Case Definition NBDPN Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance rev. 06/04 Appendix 3.5 Case Inclusion Guidance for Potentially Zika-related Birth Defects Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Brain Abnormalities with and without Microcephaly ............................................................................. 2 Microcephaly ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Intracranial Calcifications ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Cerebral / Cortical Atrophy ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Abnormal Cortical Gyral Patterns ............................................................................................................................. 9 Corpus Callosum Abnormalities ............................................................................................................................. 11 Cerebellar abnormalities ........................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
The Pathogenesis of Microcephaly Resulting from Congenital Infections: Why Is My Baby’S Head So Small?
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis DOI 10.1007/s10096-017-3111-8 REVIEW The pathogenesis of microcephaly resulting from congenital infections: why is my baby’s head so small? L. D. Frenkel1,2 & F. Gomez3 & F. Sabahi 4 Received: 29 August 2017 /Accepted: 17 September 2017 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract The emergence of Zika-virus-associated congenital review, we integrate all these findings to create a unified hy- microcephaly has engendered renewed interest in the patho- pothesis of the pathogenesis of congenital microcephaly in- genesis of microcephaly induced by infectious agents. Three duced by these infectious agents. of the original “TORCH” agents are associated with an appre- ciable incidence of congenital microcephaly: cytomegalovi- rus, rubella virus, and Toxoplasma gondii. The pathology of Introduction congenital microcephaly is characterized by neurotropic infec- tious agents that involve the fetal nervous system, leading to Microcephaly has become an issue of increased interest since brain destruction with calcifications, microcephaly, sensori- the recognition that it is a consequential manifestation of con- neural hearing loss, and ophthalmologic abnormalities. The genital Zika virus infection [1–3]. Microcephaly is generally inflammatory reaction induced by these four agents has an defined as a head circumference ≤ 2 standard deviations below important role in pathogenesis. The potential role of “strain the mean for gestational age [4]. Zika virus associated micro- differences” in pathogenesis of microcephaly by these four cephaly and other clinical manifestations of vertical transmis- pathogens is examined. Specific epidemiologic factors, such sion from mother to fetus during gestation are similar to those as first and early second trimester maternal infection, and the caused by three of the original “TORCH” agents (Toxoplasma manifestations of congenital infection in the infant, shed some gondii, rubella virus, and cytomegalovirus) [3, 5–7].
[Show full text]