SDPR Functions As a Metastasis Suppressor in Breast Cancer by Promoting Apoptosis Author(S): Sait Ozturk, Panagiotis Papageorgis, Chen Khuan Wong, Arthur W
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SDPR functions as a metastasis suppressor in breast cancer by promoting apoptosis Author(s): Sait Ozturk, Panagiotis Papageorgis, Chen Khuan Wong, Arthur W. Lambert, Hamid M. Abdolmaleky, Arunthathi Thiagalingam, Herbert T. Cohen and Sam Thiagalingam Source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , Vol. 113, No. 3 (January 19, 2016), pp. 638-643 Published by: National Academy of Sciences Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26467439 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26467439?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms National Academy of Sciences is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America This content downloaded from 103.123.71.162 on Thu, 15 Oct 2020 04:41:43 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms SDPR functions as a metastasis suppressor in breast cancer by promoting apoptosis Sait Ozturka,b,c,1, Panagiotis Papageorgisc,d,2,3, Chen Khuan Wongc,d,2, Arthur W. Lambertb,c,2,4, Hamid M. Abdolmalekyc, Arunthathi Thiagalingamc,5, Herbert T. Cohena,b,e, and Sam Thiagalingama,b,c,d,e,6 aCell and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118; bMolecular and Translational Medicine Graduate Program, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118; cBiomedical Genetics Section and Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118; dGenetics and Genomics Graduate Program, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118; and eDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118 Edited by Bert Vogelstein, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, and approved December 1, 2015 (received for review July 26, 2015) Metastatic dissemination of breast cancer cells represents a signifi- passaging of NeoT cells. When injected subcutaneously (s.c.) into cant clinical obstacle to curative therapy. The loss of function of nude mice, MII cells generally form benign tumors that progress to metastasis suppressor genes is a major rate-limiting step in breast carcinoma one out of four times; hence they mimic the early stage, cancer progression that prevents the formation of new colonies at carcinoma in situ. MIII and MIV cells were isolated from tumors distal sites. However, the discovery of new metastasis suppressor formed by MII cells. MIII cells represent carcinoma, as in general genes in breast cancer using genomic efforts has been slow, they metastasize at a very low frequency, which requires a prolonged potentially due to their primary regulation by epigenetic mecha- incubation period. On the other hand, MIV cells have the potential nisms. Here, we report the use of model cell lines with the same to readily seed lung metastases and represent the final stages of a genetic lineage for the identification of a novel metastasis suppres- breast cancer, metastatic carcinoma. We compared the gene ex- sor gene, serum deprivation response (SDPR), localized to 2q32-33, a pression profiles of these latter three model cell lines and leveraged region reported to be associated with significant loss of heterozy- large amounts of publically available breast tumor gene expression gosity in breast cancer. In silico metaanalysis of publicly available profiling data (11–13) by applying multiple bioinformatics filters to gene expression datasets suggests that the loss of expression of identify candidate metastasis suppressor genes. SDPR correlates with significantly reduced distant-metastasis–free Here, we report the discovery of the phosphatidylserine- and relapse-free survival of breast cancer patients who underwent interacting protein, serum deprivation response (SDPR) (also therapy. Furthermore, we found that stable SDPR overexpression in known as cavin-2), as a bona fide metastasis suppressor. Thus far, highly metastatic breast cancer model cell lines inhibited prosurvival studies on SDPR function have been limited to its role as a reg- pathways, shifted the balance of Bcl-2 family proteins in favor of ulator of caveolae formation (14), and its potential direct apoptosis, and decreased migration and intravasation/extravasation potential, with a corresponding drastic suppression of metastatic Significance nodule formation in the lungs of NOD/SCID mice. Moreover, SDPR expression is silenced by promoter DNA methylation, and as such it Discovery of novel metastasis suppressor genes in breast cancer exemplifies epigenetic regulation of metastatic breast cancer pro- using genomic efforts has been limited, potentially due to overlooking gression. These observations highlight SDPR as a potential prognos- their regulation by epigenetic mechanisms. We report the discovery of tic biomarker and a target for future therapeutic applications. SDPR as a novel metastasis suppressor gene localized to 2q32-33, a region associated with significant loss of heterozygosity in breast metastasis | breast cancer | SDPR | epigenetics | metastasis suppressor cancer, using comparative gene expression analysis of a breast cancer progression model system in conjunction with in silico metaanalysis he metastatic progression of breast cancer accounts for the of publicly available datasets. SDPR is silenced epigenetically by pro- Tmajority of disease-related mortality. A major rate-limiting moter DNA methylation and its loss of expression correlates with step in metastasis is the loss of function of the metastasis sup- significantly reduced distant-metastasis–free and relapse-free survival pressor genes, which block a cascade of crucial steps including of breast cancer patients. OverexpressionofSDPRreducescellmi- the loss of adhesion of primary tumor cells, intravasation into the gration and intravasation/extravasation potential, favors cell death, blood and lymphatics with subsequent extravasation at distant and suppresses experimental lung metastasis of breast cancer cells. sites, and the formation of new colonies. Despite the identifi- cation of the first metastasis suppressor gene, nonmetastatic 23 Author contributions: S.O., P.P., C.K.W., A.W.L., and S.T. designed research; S.O., P.P., and (NM23), nearly two decades ago (1), only a handful of new C.K.W. performed research; S.O., H.M.A., A.T., and H.T.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; S.O., P.P., C.K.W., A.W.L., H.M.A., A.T., H.T.C., and S.T. analyzed data; and S.O., A.W.L., H. metastasis suppressors have been identified in recent years using T.C., and S.T. wrote the paper. candidate gene approaches (2, 3). It is likely that the current The authors declare no conflict of interest. catalog of metastasis suppressor genes remains incomplete de- This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. spite the vast sequencing efforts due to the possibility that a Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. subset of genes regulated by epigenetic mechanisms may – Data deposition: The data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gene Ex- have eluded traditional discovery procedures (4 6). To identify pression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (accession no. GSE49156). these elusive metastasis suppressor genes, which are functionally 1Present address: Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New compromised in late-stage disease (7–9), we took advantage of a York, NY 10029. well-established breast cancer progression cell line model system 2P.P., C.K.W., and A.W.L. contributed equally to this work. A sharing the same genetic linage (Fig. 1 ) (10). This model system 3Present address: Department of Life Sciences, School of Sciences, European University consists of five cell lines that represent the various stages of breast Cyprus, 2404 Nicosia, Cyprus. cancer progression based on the MCF10A cell line: MCF10AneoT 4Present address: Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142. (NeoT), MCF10AT1Kcl2 (MII), MCF10CA1h (MIII), and 5Present address: IPSEN Bioscience, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142. MCF10CA1a (MIV). NeoT cells were generated by overexpression 6To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. HRAS of in MCF10A cells and rarely exhibit growth following in- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. jection into nude mice. MII cells were generated by single xenograft 1073/pnas.1514663113/-/DCSupplemental. 638–643 | PNAS | January 19, 2016 | vol. 113 | no. 3 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1514663113 This content downloaded from 103.123.71.162 on Thu, 15 Oct 2020 04:41:43 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms A metastasis suppressors (Fig. 1C). First, we interrogated each gene MI NeoT MII by accessing the Oncomine database, which revealed that 53 out of (MCF10A) +Ras (MCF10AneoT) (MCF10AT1Kcl2) the 125 genes were down-regulatedincancerscomparedwith control tissues (SI Appendix,TableS1) (13). Because Oncomine B MII MIII MIV 1 analysis incorporates independent gene expression studies that used 2 clinical samples from patients, it gave us the confidence that the 3 results we obtained from hierarchical clustering of gene expression MIII MIV 4 profiles of model cell lines is likely to be representative of the dif- (MCF10CA1h) (MCF10CA1a) ferent stages of human breast cancer progression. Next, we con- 5 6 MII MIII MIV firmed our microarray results by quantitative RT-PCR. The ex- 7 pected expression pattern, the loss of expression in metastasis, was 8 6 9 SI Appendix 10 observed for 23 out of 53 genes ( ,Fig.S1).